(KCM) As It Has Moved to a Permanent Program of the TSA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(KCM) As It Has Moved to a Permanent Program of the TSA We are very surprised at the company’s announcement that they may be considering to opt out of Known Crewmember (KCM) as it has moved to a permanent program of the TSA. The idea behind KCM is not simply to expedite security screening for known assets, such as pilots, but to alleviate additional TSA security resources in order to have more effect at passenger screening portals. This makes our entire U.S. travel system safer and protects us from additional threats. In a message to the crew force, the company writes, “The KCM program was halted abruptly as a trial offering and has suddenly become an ongoing commercial program with considerable fees attached to it. Given the extremely short notice we were given and the extensive fees, we are only now able to begin to assess the details and determine our options, and how we might reach a reasonable ongoing arrangement with the KCM program administrators.” Last year, KCM began issuing barcodes to expedite screening, if your airline paid for it. However, FedEx chose not to subscribe to the optional barcodes. Airlines for America (A4A) was notified of KCM moving to a permanent program months ago. There was nothing abrupt about the halting of the test program as the date was solidified and reported long ago. Not only has this now become a permanent program and industry best practice, FedEx and UPS are the only two carriers reported thus far to have “carved themselves out” of the 43 total US airlines participating. As we all know, another successful terror act against aviation will not “carve” FedEx out, but affect all airlines with disastrous operational and financial impacts equally. For this reason, pilots have taken on broader security roles. Airlines have also taken on a broader security role and the public expects them to provide the safest airline system in the world. The company may consider that our present use does not justify the cost. The cost per pilot is just $2.50 per month. This means that FedEx could conceivably be looking at around $138,450 per year for all pilots to be in the program. The company also mentioned some additional programming, but we have not been advised what that may entail. However, KCM “piggybacks” on CASS, and that programming has already been secured in place for a long time. Here are some facts: FedEx had 36,257 uses of CASS last year. It is almost impossible to determine how many times each individual pilot used screening at an airport, but that means that of the 4,615 eligible pilots the use of ALL screening access points (CASS is offline use only) was 3,021/month or 65.47% of the total pilot number. Remember, this would be for jumpseat only, so it doesn’t include DH positive space tickets transiting security check points as they would not be utilizing CASS at all. However, it does forecast where the use of KCM could go by demonstrating how much we transit screening checkpoints every day. The numbers will only go up as KCM is expanded. As for KCM, the sample period used was only 5 months, but it equated to 909 uses per month (at a very limited number of airports for now) or 19.69% of the eligible 4,615 pilot group. Imagine the use when KCM becomes more prevalent and especially in Memphis where the company has had as many as 64,000 deadhead tickets a year; not all originating in Memphis, but a majority for sure. You should know that Memphis is reported to us to be on the 2013 list with “high priority.” Additionally, statistical numbers from the vendor show that FedEx pilots used KCM 4,544 time during the last part of the test period (which was limited to a few portals considering the future expansion). That is 4,544 times more time was available to be directed at other potential threats to the aviation system by TSA screeners and behavioral specialists. That’s 4,544 more times our secure skies system may have been protected. That’s 4,544 more times a FedEx pilot was able to get to work with less hassle and stress. And that’s 4,544 more times a FedEx pilot was treated with the professionalism we have earned, in view of the public, at a screening portal. And that’s just the KCM numbers for 1SEP2012 through 17FEB2013! A great deal of ALPA resources, your resources, have been spent in making KCM a reality. Additionally, at the inception of KCM, ALPA made it clear that no pilot should ever pay for this program. Without ALPA, KCM would probably have never become a reality. It was ALPA that insisted pilots needed to be viewed as assets to aviation security, not threats; knowing full well all persons must still be screened in order to enter a sterile area. An additional concern is the high probability of downsizing the TSA workforce which would greatly reduce the number of screeners. This translates to fewer assets screening a portion of the population that has other means of vetting available to them such as KCM. If the company opts out, this entire situation lacks vision and professional courtesy that should be extended to all FedEx pilots--and for what, $138,450/year? The FCIF says they will “keep you apprised of our efforts and what can or cannot be done to resolve this.” The resolution is simple. The company should pay the small membership fee, $2.50 a month per pilot, just like all the other airlines do for their professionals and for the integrity of the aviation security system. Based on these facts, which clearly show that FedEx pilots do use the system, the cost is not extensive and A4A notified the company months ago that KCM was moving to a permanent program. A reasonable theory would conclude that our company may have other reasons to go down this road if they opt out. Here is the list of airlines that are participating in KCM and a list of the current and future KCM access points: Alaska Airlines (ASA) Capitol Cargo International (CCI) American Airlines (AAL) Chautauqua Airlines (CHQ) American Eagle (EGF) Commutair (UCA) Atlas Air,(GTI) Compass Airlines (CPZ) Delta (DAL) Republic Airlines (RPA) Executive Airlines (EGF) Ryan International Airlines (RYN) ExpressJet Airlines (ASQ) Seaborne Airlines (SBS) Frontier Airlines (FTT) Shuttle America Airlines (TCF) GoJet Airlines (GJS) Sky King (SGB) Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (HAL) Sky Way Enterprises (KI) Horizon Air (QXE) SkyWest Airlines (SKW) JetBlue (JBU) Southwest Airlines (SWA/TRS) Kalitta Charters II (KFS) Sun Country Airlines (SCX) Mesa Airlines (ASH) Trans States Airlines (LOF) Peninsula Airways (PEN) United Airlines (UAL/COA) Piedmont Airlines (PDT) US Airways (AWE) Pinnacle Airlines (FLG) Virgin America (VRD) Polar Air Cargo (PAC) Worldwide Jet (WWI) PSA Airlines (JIA) http://www.knowncrewmember.org/P ages/Airlines.aspx Here is the list of existing and future KCM expedited screening portals: ATL, BOS, BWI, CAE, CLT, DEN, DFW, DTW, EWR, HNL, IAD, IAH, IND, JFK, LAS, LAX, LGA, MDW, MIA, MSP, ORD, PHL, PHX, PIT, SEA, SFO, SLC, and STL. http://www.knowncrewmember.org/Pages/Airports.aspx And finally, as mentioned above, you should know that Memphis is reported to be on the 2013 list with “high priority” and that your representatives are looking into this. Rich Odbert Jumpseat Chairman Security Committee Liaison FedEx ALPA Master Executive Council .
Recommended publications
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 _____________ FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of earliest event reported: June 8, 2012 American Airlines, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-2691 13-1502798 _ (State of Incorporation) (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (817) 963-1234 _ (Registrant's telephone number) (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: [ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 8.01 Other Events AMR Corporation, the parent company of American Airlines, Inc., issued a press release on June 8, 2012 reporting May revenue and traffic results. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Airline Information Accounting and Reporting Directive
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DIRECTIVE RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION No. 304 A Issue Date: 02-01-12 Effective Date: 1-1-2012 Part: 241 Section: 04 AIR CARRIER GROUPINGS This revised 2012 Accounting and Reporting Directive is to show the merger of ExpressJet Airlines and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, along with updates the reporting groups for filing the Form 41 report during calendar year 2012. From our review, we updated the carrier groupings as follows: AIR CARRIER NEW REPORTING GROUP Kalitta Air LLC Group III Gulf & Caribbean Cargo Group I - $20 million to $100 million Kalitta Charters II Group I - $20 million to $100 million Tradewinds Airlines Group I - $20 million to $100 million Carriers are grouped according to the operating revenue boundaries contained in Section 04 of Part 241. The current reporting levels are: Group III Over $1 billion Group II Over $100 million to $1 billion Group I $100 million and under Subgroups: Group I - $20 million to $100 million Group I - Under $20 million Changes in the reporting groups will become effective January 1, 2012. Any questions regarding the groupings should be directed to [email protected]. Anne Y. Suissa Director Airline Information Attachment ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 OF 3 GROUP III AIR CARRIERS - 18 CARRIER Air Tran Alaska Airlines American Airlines American Eagle Astar * Atlas Air Delta Air Lines Federal Express Frontier Airlines Hawaiian Airlines Jet Blue Kalitta Air LLC SkyWest Southwest Airlines United Airlines (merger with Continental effective 1/1/2012) UPS USAirways World Airways * * Reporting in Group III by waiver.
    [Show full text]
  • American Airlines: Bankrupt, Like Every Other Legacy Airline
    American Airlines: Bankrupt, Like Every Other Legacy Airline June 2012 Written by Jeffrey S. Harrison, Siri Kalburgi and Colleen Koch Reed at the Robins School of Business, University of Richmond. Copyright © Jeffrey S. Harrison. This case was written for the purpose of classroom discussion. It is not to be duplicated or cited in any form without the copyright holder’s express permission. For permission to reproduce or cite this case, contact Jeff Harrison at [email protected]. In your message, state your name, affiliation and the intended use of the case. Permission for classroom use will be granted free of charge. Other cases are available at: http://robins.richmond.edu/centers/case-network.html In November of 2011, a giant fell. AMR, the holding company of American Airlines, American Eagle Airlines and AmericanConnection, which collectively serve 250 cities in 40 countries and average over 3,400 flights a day, filed for voluntary bankruptcy under Chapter 11 in a New York Federal Court.1 The roots of this legacy airline run deep. What is now American Airlines (“American”), principle subsidiary of AMR, started out as American Airways in the 1920s – the pioneer age of aviation. AMR is one of four remaining legacy carriers to have survived the Great Depression, 1978 Airline Deregulation, September 11 and the Great Recession that began in late 2007. Slowly fading from our consciousness are the legacy airlines of the past: TWA, Eastern, and Pan American. Only United, Delta, U.S. Airways and AMR still exist. The fact that AMR held out to the end was a point of pride, mostly for 2003-2011 Chairman and CEO Gerard Arpey, because Arpey saw bankruptcy as a sign of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Airlines Bankruptcy
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies College of Law Student Work 4-28-2017 How to Get Away with Merger: The American Airlines Bankruptcy Kelsey Cunningham Osborne Christopher K. Coleman Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_studlawbankruptcy Part of the Bankruptcy Law Commons Recommended Citation Cunningham Osborne, Kelsey and Coleman, Christopher K., "How to Get Away with Merger: The American Airlines Bankruptcy" (2017). Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_studlawbankruptcy/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law Student Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How To Get Away with Merger: The American Airlines Bankruptcy By: Kelsey Cunningham Osborne & Christopher K. Coleman Table of Contents Cast of Characters ...................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 II. The Debtor’s Business .......................................................................................... 7 III. Events Leading to Filing for Chapter 11 .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AMR CORPORATION American Airlines, Inc
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of earliest event reported: February 13, 2013 AMR CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-8400 75-1825172 (State (Commission (IRS Employer of Incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (817) 963-1234 (Registrant’s telephone number) (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) American Airlines, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-2691 13-1502798 (State (Commission (IRS Employer of Incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (817) 963-1234 (Registrant’s telephone number) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: x Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Table of Contents Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Item 8.01 Other Events Signatures Exhibit Index EX 2.1 EX 10.1 EX-99.1 Item 1.01.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash During Landing, Executive Airlines
    Crash During Landing Executive Airlines (doing business as American Eagle) Flight 5401 Avions de Transport Regional 72-212, N438AT San Juan, Puerto Rico May 9, 2004 Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-05/02 PB2005-910402 Notation 7650A National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C. Aircraft Accident Report Crash During Landing Executive Airlines (doing business as American Eagle) Flight 5401 Avions de Transport Regional 72-212, N438AT San Juan, Puerto Rico May 9, 2004 RAN S P T O L R A T LUR IBUS A N P UNUM E O T I I O T A N N S A D FE R NTSB/AAR-05/02 T Y B OA PB2005-910402 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 7650A 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted September 7, 2005 Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2005. Executive Airlines (doing business as American Eagle) Flight 5401, Avions de Transport Regional 72-212, N438AT, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 9, 2004. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-05/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: This report explains the accident involving Executive Airlines (doing business as American Eagle) flight 5401, an Avions de Transport Regional 72-212, which skipped once, bounced hard twice, and then crashed at Luis Muñoz Marin International Airport, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Safety issues discussed in this report focus on flight crew performance, the lack of company bounced landing recovery guidance and training, and malfunctioning flight data recorder potentiometer sensors. Safety recommendations concerning these issues are addressed to the Federal Aviation Administration. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety.
    [Show full text]
  • American Airlines Group Inc
    A Progressive Digital Media business COMPANY PROFILE American Airlines Group Inc. REFERENCE CODE: 865B9C3A-05A3-4665-9FB9-4DC58CB98E16 PUBLICATION DATE: 17 Jul 2017 www.marketline.com COPYRIGHT MARKETLINE. THIS CONTENT IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED OR DISTRIBUTED American Airlines Group Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Overview ........................................................................................................3 Key Facts.........................................................................................................................3 Business Description .....................................................................................................4 History .............................................................................................................................6 Key Employees .............................................................................................................15 Key Employee Biographies .........................................................................................16 Major Products & Services ..........................................................................................23 SWOT Analysis .............................................................................................................24 Top Competitors ...........................................................................................................29 Company View ..............................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 219/Monday, November
    Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / Notices 65627 11. Atlantic Southeast Airlines (ASA) DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND C. Subpart I 12. Big Sky Airlines URBAN DEVELOPMENT D. Construction and Safety Standards 13. Boston and Maine Airways E. Installation Standards 14. Cape Air (Hyannis Air Service) [Docket No. FR–4665–N–20] F. Accessibility—Universal Design— 15. Caribbean Air Meeting of the Manufactured Housing Visitability 16. Casino Airlines Consensus Committee G. Public Testimony 17. Casino Express TEM Enterprises H. Reports and Actions on Committee 18. Champion Air (Grand Holdings) AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Work 19. Chautauqua Airlines Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing I. Adjourn 20. Chicago Express Airlines Commissioner, HUD. Dated: November 9, 2004. 21. Colgan Air ACTION: Notice of upcoming meeting. John C. Weicher, 22. Comair, Inc. 23. Commutair (Champlain Ent.) SUMMARY: This advises the public of an Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal 24. Continental Airlines Inc. upcoming meeting of the Manufactured Housing Commissioner. 25. Continental Micronesia Inc. Housing Consensus Committee (the [FR Doc. 04–25389 Filed 11–10–04; 11:36 26. Corporate Airlines Committee) and publishes the schedule am] 27. Delta Air Lines Inc. and proposed agenda for the meeting. BILLING CODE 4210–27–P 28. Executive Airlines/American Eagle The meeting is open to the public and 29. Expressjet Airlines (Cont. Express) the site is accessible to individuals with 30. Falcon Air Express disabilities. INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION 31. Freedom Air DATES: The Committee will meet on Sunshine Act Meeting 32. Freedom Airlines November 30, 2004 and December 1, 33. Frontier Airlines 2004, from 8 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Amr Corporation
    AMR CORPORATION 2003 Annual Report SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [√] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commission file number 1-8400. AMR Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 75-1825172 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) of incorporation or organization) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (817) 963-1234 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered Common stock, $1 par value per share New York Stock Exchange 9.00% Debentures due 2016 New York Stock Exchange 7.875% Public Income Notes due 2039 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes √ No . Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations
    Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Flight Ops - All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations Current Year: 10/2010 - 09/2011 Prior Year:10/2009 - 09/2010 Domestic International % Domestic International Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Total Change Operator Total Arrival Departure Arrival Departure 44,847 46,761 35,447 33,401 160,456 4.19% American Airlines Inc 154,000 42,423 44,158 34,651 32,768 18,917 18,921 5,359 5,360 48,557 18.90% Executive Airlines dba American 40,840 14,046 14,036 6,375 6,383 Eagle Airlines Inc 10,786 12,977 3,062 791 27,616 5.55% Generic Cash and GA Account 26,163 11,630 12,538 1,451 544 10,589 10,570 185 186 21,530 48.28% Delta Air Lines Inc 14,520 7,263 7,255 0 2 262 388 3,308 3,174 7,132 26.77% IBC Airways Inc 5,626 284 289 2,530 2,523 935 931 2,550 2,548 6,964 3.97% United Parcel Service 6,698 952 954 2,396 2,396 3,290 3,290 0 0 6,580 0.37% US Airways Inc 6,556 3,278 3,278 0 0 3,277 3,275 4 4 6,560 -2.67% Continental Airlines 6,740 3,370 3,370 0 0 0 0 2,359 2,318 4,677 8.57% LAN Airlines f/k/a LAN Chile SA 4,308 0 0 2,175 2,133 0 0 2,258 2,260 4,518 -3.19% TACA - Grupo TACA 4,667 0 0 2,333 2,334 61 61 2,183 2,174 4,479 118.17% Sky King Inc 2,053 46 51 980 976 0 0 2,155 2,146 4,301 -2.49% Avianca - Aerovias Nacionales de 4,411 0 0 2,206 2,205 Colombia SA 622 622 1,262 1,262 3,768 49.64% ABX Air 2,518 332 332 927 927 0 0 1,834 1,833 3,667 59.43% Aeromexico 2,300 0 0 1,150 1,150 0 0 1,804 1,804 3,608 8.87% Amerijet International 3,314 2 2 1,655 1,655 3 4 1,766 1,764 3,537 21.55% TAM Linhas Aéreas SA 2,910 0 0 1,455 1,455 1,588 1,315 2 273 3,178 9.97% Federal Express Corporation 2,890 1,442 1,138 3 307 0 0 1,538 1,538 3,076 -14.41% Tampa Cargo S.A.
    [Show full text]