DOCSLIB.ORG

Botany and Wetlands Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Botany and Wetlands Study Report Botany and Wetlands Study Report Swan Lake Expansion Project (FERC Project No. 2911) Revised Final April 2013 Ketchikan, Alaska Prepared by: Kathryn Beck, Botanist Beck Botanical Services, and Karen Brimacombe, Ecologist Tetra Tech Bothell, Washington and McMillen, LLC Boise, Idaho Botany and Wetlands Study Report Southeast Alaska Power Agency TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Description .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purposes of the 2012 Environmental Field Program....................................................... 3 1.3 Changes Made to the Study Plan in Response to Comments or Permit Conditions ....... 3 1.4 Compliance with Permit Terms, Conditions, and Regulatory Framework ...................... 3 1.4.1 Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan............................................ 4 1.4.2 Clean Water Act ............................................................................................ 6 1.4.3 Other Regulations ......................................................................................... 6 2 Procedures ...........................................................................................................6 2.1 Analysis Area ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Pre-Field Contact with Forest Service and Review of Existing Information .................... 7 2.3 Field Investigation Surveys .............................................................................................. 7 2.3.1 Sensitive and Rare Plants .............................................................................. 8 2.3.2 Wetland Resources ....................................................................................... 8 3 Environmental Setting ..........................................................................................8 3.1 Vegetation Resources ...................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Sensitive Plants .............................................................................................................. 10 3.3 Rare Plants ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Plant Species Newly Documented in Alaska .................................................................. 13 3.5 General Vegetation Types ............................................................................................. 13 3.6 Invasive Plants ............................................................................................................... 15 3.7 Wetland Resources ........................................................................................................ 15 3.7.1 Forested Wetlands ...................................................................................... 17 3.7.2 Emergent Sedge Wetlands .......................................................................... 17 3.7.3 Moss Muskegs ............................................................................................. 17 4 Project Effects .................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Identified Issues and Concerns for Sensitive Plants ...................................................... 18 4.1.1 Spatulate moonwort (Botrychium spathulatum W.H.Wagner) ................ 19 Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project April 2013 FERC Project No. 2911 Page i Version: Revised Final Botany and Wetlands Study Report Southeast Alaska Power Agency 4.1.2 Edible thistle (Cirsium edule var. macounii (Greene) D.J.Keil) .................... 19 4.1.3 Mountain lady’s slipper (Cypripedium montanum Douglas ex Lindl.) ........ 19 4.1.4 Large Yellow Lady’s Slipper Orchid (Cypripedium parviflorum Salisb. var. pubescens (Willdenow) O. W. Knight) ......................................................... 20 4.1.5 Calder’s lovage (Ligusticum calderi Math. & Const.) .................................. 20 4.1.6 Alaska Rein Orchid (Piperia unalascensis (Spreng.) Rydb.) ......................... 20 4.1.7 Lesser Round‐Leaved Orchid (Platanthera orbiculata (Pursh) Lindl.) ......... 21 4.1.8 Kruckeberg’s swordfern (Polystichum kruckebergii W.H. Wagner) ........... 21 4.2 Identified Issues and Concerns for Rare Plants ............................................................. 22 4.2.1 Maidenhair spleenwort (Asplenium trichomanes L. ssp. trichomanes) ...... 22 4.2.2 Brightgreen spleenwort (Asplenium trichomanes‐ramosum L.) ................. 22 4.2.3 Boreal bedstraw (Galium kamtschaticum Steller ex Schult & Schult) ........ 23 4.2.4 Northern bugleweed (Lycopus uniflorus Michx.) ........................................ 23 4.2.5 Bog adder’s‐mouth orchid (Malaxis paludosa (L.) Swartz) ......................... 24 4.2.6 Choris’ bog‐orchid (Platanthera chorisiana (Cham.) Reichenb.) ................ 25 4.2.7 Pacific Buttercup (Ranunculus pacificus (Hulten) L.D.Benson) ................... 25 4.3 Identified Issues and Concern for Plants Newly Documented in Alaska ....................... 26 4.3.1 Wallace’s spikemoss (Selaginella wallacei Heiron.) .................................... 26 4.3.2 Bog St. John’s‐wort (Hypericum anagalloides Cham. & Schltdl.) ................ 27 4.4 Management Requirements and Mitigation Measures for Sensitive and Rare Plants . 27 4.5 Identified Issues and Concerns for General Vegetation ................................................ 28 4.5.1 Old‐Growth Forest ...................................................................................... 28 4.5.2 Young Growth Forest .................................................................................. 29 4.6 Management Requirements and Mitigation Measures for General Vegetation .......... 29 4.7 Identified Issues and Concerns to Wetland Resources ................................................. 30 4.7.1 Effects from Rising Reservoir Levels Within the Analysis Area ................... 30 4.7.2 Effects from Construction‐related Activities Occuring at and Below the Dam ............................................................................................ 31 4.8 Management Requirements and Mitigation Measures for Wetland Resources .......... 32 5 References ........................................................................................................... 32 Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project April 2013 FERC Project No. 2911 Page ii Version: Revised Final Botany and Wetlands Study Report Southeast Alaska Power Agency TABLES Table 1. Known or Suspected Sensitive Plants in the Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District .... 10 Table 2. Rare Plants Observed within the Analysis Area .............................................................. 11 Table 3. General Vegetation Types in the Analysis Area1/ ............................................................ 13 Table 4. Acres of Wetland Resources in the Analysis Area1/ ........................................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 1. Project Vicinity ................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Rare Plants Observed within the Survey Study Area ..................................................... 12 Figure 3. Vegetation Communities in the Analysis Area .............................................................. 14 Figure 4. Wetlands in the Survey Study Area ............................................................................... 16 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Response to Agency Comments Received Attachment 2 Forest Service Alaska Region Sensitive Species List, May 2012 Attachment 3 Alaska Natural Heritage Program 2012 Rare Vascular Plant List Attachment 4 Swan Lake Project Area Photos Attachment 5 Botanical Survey Types Attachment 6 Rare Plant Element Occurrence Field Forms Attachment 7 Description of Rare Plant Populations Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project April 2013 FERC Project No. 2911 Page iii Version: Revised Final Botany and Wetlands Study Report Southeast Alaska Power Agency ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AKNHP Alaska Natural Heritage Program BMP Best Management Practices CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ft feet FSH Forest Service Handbook FSM Forest Service Manual GIS geographic information system GPS global positioning system ICD Initial Consultation Document LUD land use designation MMI Mass Movement Index mi miles NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFA National Forest Management Act NF National Forest NFS National Forest System NWI National Wetlands Inventory PMF probable maximum flood Project Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project SEAPA Southeast Alaska Power Agency SMU Soil Management Units TES threatened, endangered and sensitive USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFS United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project April 2013 FERC Project No. 2911 Page iv Version: Revised Final Botany and Wetlands Study Report Southeast Alaska Power Agency 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description The Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA) is the licensee for the Swan Lake Project, Federal Energy Regulatory (FERC) No. 2911 (Project), on the northeast side of Carroll Inlet in Southeast Alaska. SEAPA is currently evaluating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic
    Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic Technical Report No. 3 About CAFF Theprogram for the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) of the Arctic Council was established lo address the special needs of Arctic ecosystems, species and thcir habitats in the rapid ly developing Arctic region. Itwas initiated as one of'four programs of the Arctic Environmental Protcction Strategy (AEPS) which was adopted by Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Finland, lceland, Norway, Russia, Swcdcn and the United States through a Ministeria! Declaration at Rovaniemi, Finland in 1991. Other programs initi­ ated under the AEPS and overlaken hy the Are.tie Council are the ArcticMonitoring and assessment Programme (AMAP), the program for Emergency Prevention, Preparcd­ ness and Response (EPPR) and the program for Protection of the Arctic Marine Envi­ ronment (PAME). Sinceits inaugural mccti.ng in Ottawa, Canada in 1992, the CAFF program has provided scientists, conscrvation managers and groups, and indigenous people of the north with a distinct forum in which lo tackle a wide range of Arctic conservation issues at the cir­ cumpolar level. CAFF's main goals, which are achieved in keeping with the concepts of sustainable developrnertt and utilisation, are: • to conserve Arctic Jlora and fauna, thcir diversity and thcir habitats; • to protect the Arctic ecosystems from threats; • to improve conservation management laws, reg ulations and practices for the Arclic; • to integrale Arctic interests into global conservation fora. CAFF operates rhrough a system of Designated Agencies and National Representatives responsible for CAFF in thcir rcspcctivc countries. CAFF also has an International Work­ ing Group wh.ith has met annually to assess progrcss and to develop Annual WorkPlans.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium Vitis-Idaea Eileen Schaub [email protected]
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Master's Theses University of Connecticut Graduate School 8-30-2019 Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea Eileen Schaub [email protected] Recommended Citation Schaub, Eileen, "Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea" (2019). Master's Theses. 1434. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/1434 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Connecticut Graduate School at OpenCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea Eileen Patricia Schaub B.A., Western Connecticut State University, 2013 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science At the University of Connecticut 2019 Copyright by Eileen Patricia Schaub 2019 ii Approval Page Master of Science Thesis Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea Presented by Eileen P. Schaub, B.A. Major Advisor _________________________________________________________________ Pamela K. Diggle Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Cynthia S. Jones Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Donald Les University of Connecticut 2019 iii Introduction The boreal zone, located between 50 and 70º north latitude, is the largest terrestrial biome, comprising 11% of Earth’s landmass across North America, Europe, and Asia (Brandt, 2009). It consists primarily of coniferous forest, with some deciduous tree species and numerous shrub and grass species.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Studies of Parasenecio (Asteraceae-Senecioneae) I
    J. Jpn. Bot. 90: 92–97 (2015) Systematic Studies of Parasenecio (Asteraceae-Senecioneae) I. Parasenecio katoanus, a New Species from Yamagata Prefecture, Northern Honshu, Japan Yuichi KADOTA Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1, Amakubo, Tsukuba, 305-0005 JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] (Accepted on November 1, 2014) A new species of Parasenecio (Asteraceae-Senecioneae), P. katoanus Kadota, is described from the Shônai region, Yamagata Pref., northern Honshu, Japan. Parasenecio katoanus is distinguished from P. nikomontanus (Matsum.) H. Koyama by having 1) triangular-pentagonal, somewhat fleshy, dimly lustrous, usually glabrous leaf blades, 2) longer involucres with acute involucral phyllaries, 3) longer achenes, and 4) ascending peduncles at an acute angle. It was found that the flowers were fragrant in the midst of flowering time. Parasenecio katoanus is hitherto known only from the Shônai area of Yamagata Pref. Key words: Asteraceae, Japan, new species, Parasenecio katoanus, the Shônai region, Yamagata Prefecture. This is the first part of a series of systematic blades and is commonly distributed on the studies of the genus Parasenecio (Asteraceae- Japan Sea side of Honshu Island ranging from Senecioneae). The genus consists of more Akita Pref. to Shimane Pref. (Koyama 1995, than 60 species (Chen 1999). It shows an East Kadota unpubl.). The Japanese vernacular name Asian and Eastern North American disjunct ‘Ô-kani-kômori’ is derived from the shape of distribution pattern and its considerable number leaf blades, of which ‘Kani’ means the shape of of species are recognized in the Sino-Japanese crab carapace. floristic region (Koyama 1983, Chen 1999, Parasenecio nikomontanus also occurs Kadota 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • (Dr. Sc. Nat.) Vorgelegt Der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftl
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-88785 Dissertation Originally published at: de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel. Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae. 2012, University of Zurich, Facultyof Science. FLOWERS, SEX, AND DIVERSITY. REPRODUCTIVE-ECOLOGICAL AND MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF FLORAL VARIATION IN THE PRIMROSE FAMILY, PRIMULACEAE Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Jurriaan Michiel de Vos aus den Niederlanden Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Elena Conti (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Antony B. Wilson Dr. Colin E. Hughes Zürich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s ist ein zentrales Ziel in der Evolutionsbiologie, die Muster der Vielfalt und die Prozesse, die sie erzeugen, zu verstehen.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Report Charge
    Swan Lake Expansion Project (FERC Project No. 2911) Botany Resource Report FINAL Prepared for: Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District Tongass National Forest and Ketchikan, Alaska Prepared by: Kathryn Beck, Botanist Beck Botanical Services Karen Brimacombe, Ecologist McMillen, LLC January 2014 Botany Resource Report FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 The National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA) .................................... 3 1.2.2 USDA Departmental Regulations 9500-004 ....................................................... 3 1.2.3 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 219.19 (2000) ....................................... 3 1.2.4 Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan .................................................. 3 1.3 Analysis Area ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Action Alternatives and Reasonably Foreseeable Projects ...................................................... 4 2.1.1 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Proposed Action Alternative ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map - 267
    Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 267-282, 2005 © IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala. - The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map - 267 The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map Walker, Donald A.1*; Raynolds, Martha K.1; Daniëls, Fred J.A.2; Einarsson, Eythor3; Elvebakk, Arve4; Gould, William A.5; Katenin, Adrian E.6; Kholod, Sergei S.6,7; Markon, Carl J.8; Melnikov, Evgeny S.8,9; Moskalenko, Natalia G.8,10; Talbot, Stephen S.11; Yurtsev, Boris A.(†)6 & the other members of the CAVM Team12 1Alaska Geobotany Center, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 311 Irving, P.O. Box 757000, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; 2Institute für Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Schloßgarten 3, D-48149 Münster, Germany; E-mail [email protected]; 3Icelandic Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 5320, Reykjavik, Iceland; E-mail [email protected]; 4Institute of Biology and Geology, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway; E-mail [email protected]; 5International Institute for Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, 1201 Calle Ceiba, San Juan, Puerto Rico, PR 00927-1119, USA; E-mail [email protected]; 6Department of Far North Vegetation, Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Prof. Popov str. 2, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia; E-mail [email protected]; 7E-mail [email protected]; 8USGS Alaska Geographic Science Office, 4230 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508-4664 USA; E-mail [email protected]; 8 Earth Cryosphere Institute SB RAS, Vavilov str. 30/6, r. 85, Moscow 119991, Russia; 9E-mail [email protected]; 10E-mail [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • Population Biology of Intraspecific Polyploidy in Grasses
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 1998 Population biology of intraspecific polyploidy in grasses Kathleen H. Keeler University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub Part of the Botany Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Keeler, Kathleen H., "Population biology of intraspecific polyploidy in grasses" (1998). Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences. 296. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub/296 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Keeler in "Population Biology of Grasses" (ed., GP Cheplick), Part 1: Population Variation and Life History Patterns, chapter 7. Copyright 1998, Cambridge University Press. Used by permission. 7 Population biology of intraspecific polyploidy In grasses KATHLEEN H. KEELER Polyploidy is the duplication of an entire nuclear genome, whether diploid or higher level (Stebbins, 1971; Thompson & Lumaret, 1992) and a fre­ quent occurrence in plants. Stebbins (1971) estimated that 30-35% of flow­ ering plant species are polyploid, and that many more had a polyploid event in their evolutionary history, including all members of such important fam­ ilies as the Magnoliaceae, Salicaceae, and Ericaceae. Goldblatt (1980) esti­ mated 55%, but probably up to 75%, of monocotyledons had at least one polyploid event in their history, using the criterion that if the species has a base number higher than n=13 it is derived from a polyploid.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Jiu Zhai Gou V1.2 Brian Sennitt and David Z V
    Plants of Jiu Zhai Gou v1.2 Brian Sennitt and David Z v 九 寨 沟 植 物 Plants of Jiu Zhai Gou National Park Foreword 序言 by Professor Sir Ghillean Prance FRS, VMH Introduction and Poem by Brian Sennitt Chapter 1 第一章 P43 - Clematis sp. 铁线莲 P1 - Introduction to Chapter 1 P44 - Clematis tangutica 甘青铁线莲 第一章 前言 P45 - Clematoclethra scandens subsp. actinidioides P2 - Algae 藻类 猕猴桃藤山柳 P3 - Mosses 藓类 P46 - Cornus bretschneideri 沙梾 P4/5 - Lichens 地衣 P47 - Cynoglossum amabile 倒提壶 P6 - Usnea longissima长松萝 P48 - Delphinium sp. 翠雀花 P7 - Equisetum spp.木贼属 P49 - Deutzia longifolia var. pingwuensis 平武溲疏 P8 - Lycopodioides nipponica 伏地卷柏 P50 - Dipelta yunnanensis 云南双盾木 P9 - Athyrium filix-femina 希陶蹄盖蕨 P51 - Epipactis mairei 大叶火烧兰 Dryopteris sp. 鳞毛蕨属 P52 - Euonymus semenovii 中亚卫矛 P10 - Fern 蕨类植物 P53 - A Grass 禾本科植物 九 P11 - Drynaria fortunei 斛蕨 P54 - Grass Family 禾本科 P12 - Lepisorus sp. 瓦韦 P55 - Hemerocallis plicata 褶叶萱草 寨 P13 - Cephalotaxus fortunei 三尖杉 P56 - Hydrangea sp. 绣球花 P14 - Juniperus formosana 刺柏 P57 - Hypericum ascyron 黄海棠 P15 -Sabina squamata 高山柏 P58 - Lianas 木质藤本 沟 P16 - Abies fargesii 秦岭巴山冷杉 P59 - Ligularia przewalskii 掌叶橐吾 P17 - Picea purpurea 紫果云杉 P60 - Lilium davidii 川百合 植 P18 - Picea wilsonii 青杄 P61 - Member of the Lily Family 百合 P19 - Larix potaninii红杉 P62 - Lonicera tragophylla 盘叶忍冬 物 P20 - Tsuga chinensis 铁杉 P63 - Lonicera lanceolata 柳叶忍冬 P21 - Pinus armandii 华山松 P64 - Lonicera sp 金脉忍冬 P22/3 - Pinus tabuliformis 油松 P65 - Lonicera kansuensis 甘肃忍冬 P24 - Acer caudatum 长尾槭 P66 - Lysimachia barystachys 狼尾花 P25 - Acer mono色木槭 P67 - Lythrum salicaria 千屈菜 目 P26 - Betula utilis 糙皮桦 P68 - Microula sikkimensis 微孔草 P27 - Circaeaster agrestis 星叶草 P69 - Monotropa hypopitys 松下兰 录 P28 - Paeonia veitchii 川赤芍 P70 - Orchis chusua 广布红门兰 P71 - Oreorchis nana 硬叶山兰 P72 - Parasenecio hastatus 山尖子 Chapter 2 第二章 P73 - Parnassia sp 梅花草属 P74 - Paulownia fortunei 白花泡桐 P29 - Introduction to Chapter 2 P75 - Pedicularis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Morphology and the Role of Hybridization As Driving Force Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/707588; this version posted July 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Phylogeny, morphology and the role of hybridization as driving force of evolution in 2 grass tribes Aveneae and Poeae (Poaceae) 3 4 Natalia Tkach,1 Julia Schneider,1 Elke Döring,1 Alexandra Wölk,1 Anne Hochbach,1 Jana 5 Nissen,1 Grit Winterfeld,1 Solveig Meyer,1 Jennifer Gabriel,1,2 Matthias H. Hoffmann3 & 6 Martin Röser1 7 8 1 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 9 Garden, Dept. of Systematic Botany, Neuwerk 21, 06108 Halle, Germany 10 2 Present address: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher 11 Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 12 3 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 13 Garden, Am Kirchtor 3, 06108 Halle, Germany 14 15 Addresses for correspondence: Martin Röser, [email protected]; Natalia 16 Tkach, [email protected] 17 18 ABSTRACT 19 To investigate the evolutionary diversification and morphological evolution of grass 20 supertribe Poodae (subfam. Pooideae, Poaceae) we conducted a comprehensive molecular 21 phylogenetic analysis including representatives from most of their accepted genera. We 22 focused on generating a DNA sequence dataset of plastid matK gene–3'trnK exon and trnL– 23 trnF regions and nuclear ribosomal ITS1–5.8S gene–ITS2 and ETS that was taxonomically 24 overlapping as completely as possible (altogether 257 species).
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volume 8, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treat- ments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recom- mended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu et al. (1992– 2009). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alpha- betically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. There may be citations in this list that have dates suffixed “b” but that are not preceded by citations of “[a]” works for the same year, or that have dates suffixed “c,” “d,” or “e” but that are not preceded by citations of “[a],” “b,” “c,” and/or “d” works for that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Vascular Plants of the North Slope a Review of the Taxonomy, Distribution, and Ecology of 31 Rare Plant Taxa That Occur in Alaska’S North Slope Region
    BLM U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management BLM Alaska Technical Report 58 BLM/AK/GI-10/002+6518+F030 December 2009 Rare Vascular Plants of the North Slope A Review of the Taxonomy, Distribution, and Ecology of 31 Rare Plant Taxa That Occur in Alaska’s North Slope Region Helen Cortés-Burns, Matthew L. Carlson, Robert Lipkin, Lindsey Flagstad, and David Yokel Alaska The BLM Mission The Bureau of Land Management sustains the health, diversity and productivity of the Nation’s public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Cover Photo Drummond’s bluebells (Mertensii drummondii). © Jo Overholt. This and all other copyrighted material in this report used with permission. Author Helen Cortés-Burns is a botanist at the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP) in Anchorage, Alaska. Matthew Carlson is the program botanist at AKNHP and an assistant professor in the Biological Sciences Department, University of Alaska Anchorage. Robert Lipkin worked as a botanist at AKNHP until 2009 and oversaw the botanical information in Alaska’s rare plant database (Biotics). Lindsey Flagstad is a research biologist at AKNHP. David Yokel is a wildlife biologist at the Bureau of Land Management’s Arctic Field Office in Fairbanks. Disclaimer The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or rec- ommendation for use by the federal government. Technical Reports Technical Reports issued by BLM-Alaska present results of research, studies, investigations, literature searches, testing, or similar endeavors on a variety of scientific and technical subjects. The results pre- sented are final, or a summation and analysis of data at an intermediate point in a long-term research project, and have received objective review by peers in the author’s field.
    [Show full text]