DOCSLIB.ORG

Specialist Report Charge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Specialist Report Charge Swan Lake Expansion Project (FERC Project No. 2911) Botany Resource Report FINAL Prepared for: Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District Tongass National Forest and Ketchikan, Alaska Prepared by: Kathryn Beck, Botanist Beck Botanical Services Karen Brimacombe, Ecologist McMillen, LLC January 2014 Botany Resource Report FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 The National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA) .................................... 3 1.2.2 USDA Departmental Regulations 9500-004 ....................................................... 3 1.2.3 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 219.19 (2000) ....................................... 3 1.2.4 Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan .................................................. 3 1.3 Analysis Area ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Action Alternatives and Reasonably Foreseeable Projects ...................................................... 4 2.1.1 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Proposed Action Alternative ............................................................................... 5 2.2 Reasonably Foreseeable Projects...................................................................................... 9 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Pre-Field Review of Existing Information ....................................................................... 9 3.2 Field Surveys .................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Determination of Effects and Risk Assessment ............................................................. 10 3.4 GIS Analyses .................................................................................................................. 11 4 Affected Environment ............................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Vegetation Resources ..................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Sensitive Plants ............................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Rare Plants ...................................................................................................................... 13 4.4 General Vegetation Types .............................................................................................. 16 4.5 Invasive Plants ................................................................................................................ 18 5 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................................ 18 5.1 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects for Sensitive Plants ........................................ 18 5.1.1 Spatulate Moonwort (Botrychium spathulatum W.H.Wagner)......................... 18 5.1.2 Mountain Lady’s Slipper (Cypripedium montanum Douglas ex Lindl.) .......... 19 5.1.3 Large Yellow Lady’s Slipper Orchid (Cypripedium parviflorum Salisb. var. pubescens (Willdenow) O. W. Knight) ............................................................. 20 5.1.4 Alaska Rein Orchid (Piperia unalascensis (Spreng.) Rydb.) ............................ 20 5.1.5 Lesser Round-Leaved Orchid (Platanthera orbiculata (Pursh)) ........................ 22 5.2 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects for Rare Plants ............................................... 23 5.2.1 Northern Bugleweed (Lycopus uniflorus Michx.) ............................................ 23 5.2.2 Pacific Buttercup (Ranunculus pacificus (Hulten) L.D.Benson) ...................... 25 5.2.3 Wallace’s Spikemoss (Selaginella wallacei Heiron.) ........................................ 26 5.2.4 Bog St. John’s-wort (Hypericum anagalloides Cham. & Schltdl.) ................... 26 5.3 Mitigation ....................................................................................................................... 27 5.4 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects for General Vegetation .................................. 28 5.4.1 Old-Growth Forest ............................................................................................ 29 5.4.2 Young-Growth Forest ....................................................................................... 30 5.4.3 Unproductive Forest .......................................................................................... 30 5.5 Mitigation Measures for General Vegetation ................................................................. 31 6 References .............................................................................................................................. 31 Page | i Botany Resource Report FINAL LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of Characteristics for the Proposed Action ................................................... 6 Table 2. Known or Suspected Sensitive Plants in the Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District and Presence of Potential Habitat within the Survey Area ............................ 12 Table 3. Rare Plants Observed within the Survey Area ............................................................ 14 Table 4. General Vegetation Types in the Survey Area............................................................ 16 Table 5. Acres of Impacts to General Vegetation Types due to the Proposed Action .............. 28 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Area .................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Project Area Above Dam .............................................................................................. 7 Figure 3. Project Area Below the Dam ........................................................................................ 8 Figure 4. Rare Plants Observed within the Survey Area ............................................................ 15 Figure 5. Vegetation Communities in the Survey Area ............................................................. 17 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Forest Service Alaska Region Sensitive Species List, May 2012 Appendix B Alaska Natural Heritage Program 2012 Rare Vascular Plant List Appendix C Current and Reasonably Foreseeable Projects on the Tongass National Forest Appendix D Survey Types Appendix E Description of Populations of Rare Plant Observed in the Survey Area Appendix F Rare Plant Element Occurrence Field Forms Appendix G Response to Agency Comments on the Draft Resource Report Page | ii Botany Resource Report FINAL 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Description The Southeast Alaska Power Agency (SEAPA) is the licensee for the Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) No. 2911 (Project), on the northeast side of Carroll Inlet in Southeast Alaska. SEAPA is currently evaluating the engineering feasibility and value of increasing the storage capacity of the Swan Lake reservoir through an increase in the dam height. Around the reservoir, the FERC boundary roughly follows the 350- foot elevation contour on the Project drawings. SEAPA is planning a 15-foot raise in full pool elevation; dam crest elevation would increase from an elevation of 344 feet to 350 feet to accommodate a new Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) of 347 feet. The normal maximum surface area of the reservoir would increase from 330 feet to 345 feet. As a result of the proposed action, the maximum operating pool of the reservoir would change from 330 feet mean sea level (MSL) to 345 feet MSL, thereby increasing the active storage capacity of Swan Lake from 81,704 acre-feet (ac-ft) to 102,467 ac-ft (an increase of approximately 25 percent). It is estimated that there are about 14 miles of shoreline around the reservoir, much of which is moderately to extremely steep (Figure 1). The Project is located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 27, Township 72 South, Range 92 East, Copper River Meridian. A portion of the proposed reservoir expansion area will include National Forest System (NFS) lands, particularly in the area of Lost Creek, a tributary that enters the existing reservoir on the northeast side. The Project’s FERC license sets the Project’s boundary around the reservoir at the 350-foot elevation contour. As currently proposed, the increased reservoir will be entirely contained within the existing FERC boundary and there are no plans to seek a change in the boundary with FERC; however, it is possible that in the course of determining necessary mitigation measures a revision of this boundary may be necessary to implement measures sought by the FERC or agencies. These could include measures for recreation, shoreline control, or protection of environmental resources. Any proposed changes to the facilities, the operation of the reservoir, and potential changes to the Project boundary will require amending the Project’s FERC license, a process that includes evaluating the potential impacts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • (Dr. Sc. Nat.) Vorgelegt Der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftl
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-88785 Dissertation Originally published at: de Vos, Jurriaan Michiel. Flowers, sex, and diversity: Reproductive-ecological and macro-evolutionary aspects of floral variation in the Primrose family, Primulaceae. 2012, University of Zurich, Facultyof Science. FLOWERS, SEX, AND DIVERSITY. REPRODUCTIVE-ECOLOGICAL AND MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF FLORAL VARIATION IN THE PRIMROSE FAMILY, PRIMULACEAE Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Jurriaan Michiel de Vos aus den Niederlanden Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Elena Conti (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Antony B. Wilson Dr. Colin E. Hughes Zürich, 2013 !!"#$"#%! "#$%&$%'! (! )*'+,,&$-+''*$.! /! '0$#1'2'! 3! "4+1%&5!26!!"#"$%&'(#)$*+,-)(*#! 77! "4+1%&5!226!-*#)$%.)(#!'&*#!/'%#+'.0*$)/)"$1'(12%-).'*3'0")"$*.)4&4'*#' "5*&,)(*#%$4'+(5"$.(3(-%)(*#'$%)".'(#'+%$6(#7.'2$(1$*.".! 89! "4+1%&5!2226!.1%&&'%#+',!&48'%'9,%#)()%)(5":'-*12%$%)(5"'"5%&,%)(*#'*3' )0"';."&3(#!'.4#+$*1"<'(#'0")"$*.)4&*,.'%#+'0*1*.)4&*,.'2$(1$*.".! 93! "4+1%&5!2:6!$"2$*+,-)(5"'(12&(-%)(*#.'*3'0"$=*!%14'(#'0*1*.)4&*,.' 2$(1$*.".>'5%$(%)(*#'+,$(#!'%#)0".(.'%#+'$"2$*+,-)(5"'%..,$%#-"'(#' %&2(#"'"#5($*#1"#).! 7;7! "4+1%&5!:6!204&*!"#")(-'%#%&4.(.'*3'!"#$%&''."-)(*#'!"#$%&''$"5"%&.' $%12%#)'#*#/1*#*204&4'%1*#!'1*2$0*&*!(-%&&4'+(.)(#-)'.2"-(".! 773! "4+1%&5!:26!-*#-&,+(#!'$"1%$=.! 7<(! +"=$#>?&@.&,&$%'! 7<9! "*552"*?*,!:2%+&! 7<3! !!"#$$%&'#""!&(! Es ist ein zentrales Ziel in der Evolutionsbiologie, die Muster der Vielfalt und die Prozesse, die sie erzeugen, zu verstehen.
    [Show full text]
  • Apomixis Is Not Prevalent in Subnival to Nival Plants of the European Alps
    Annals of Botany 108: 381–390, 2011 doi:10.1093/aob/mcr142, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Apomixis is not prevalent in subnival to nival plants of the European Alps Elvira Ho¨randl1,*, Christoph Dobesˇ2, Jan Suda3,4, Petr Vı´t3,4, Toma´sˇ Urfus3,4, Eva M. Temsch1, Anne-Caroline Cosendai1, Johanna Wagner5 and Ursula Ladinig5 1Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, 2Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria, 3Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic, 4Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Pru˚honice, Czech Republic and 5Institute of Botany, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 2 December 2010 Returned for revision: 14 January 2011 Accepted: 28 April 2011 Published electronically: 1 July 2011 † Background and Aims High alpine environments are characterized by short growing seasons, stochastic climatic conditions and fluctuating pollinator visits. These conditions are rather unfavourable for sexual reproduction of flowering plants. Apomixis, asexual reproduction via seed, provides reproductive assurance without the need of pollinators and potentially accelerates seed development. Therefore, apomixis is expected to provide selective advantages in high-alpine biota. Indeed, apomictic species occur frequently in the subalpine to alpine grassland zone of the European Alps, but the mode of reproduction of the subnival to nival flora was largely unknown. † Methods The mode of reproduction in 14 species belonging to seven families was investigated via flow cyto- metric seed screen.
    [Show full text]
  • World Distribution, Diversity and Endemism of Aquatic Macrophytes T ⁎ Kevin Murphya, , Andrey Efremovb, Thomas A
    Aquatic Botany 158 (2019) 103127 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot World distribution, diversity and endemism of aquatic macrophytes T ⁎ Kevin Murphya, , Andrey Efremovb, Thomas A. Davidsonc, Eugenio Molina-Navarroc,1, Karina Fidanzad, Tânia Camila Crivelari Betiold, Patricia Chamberse, Julissa Tapia Grimaldoa, Sara Varandas Martinsa, Irina Springuelf, Michael Kennedyg, Roger Paulo Mormuld, Eric Dibbleh, Deborah Hofstrai, Balázs András Lukácsj, Daniel Geblerk, Lars Baastrup-Spohrl, Jonathan Urrutia-Estradam,n,o a University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, United Kingdom b Omsk State Pedagogical University, 14, Tukhachevskogo nab., 644009 Omsk, Russia c Lake Group, Dept of Bioscience, Silkeborg, Aarhus University, Denmark d NUPELIA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil e Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada f Department of Botany & Environmental Science, Aswan University, 81528 Sahari, Egypt g School of Energy, Construction and Environment, University of Coventry, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom h Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA i National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Hamilton, New Zealand j Department of Tisza River Research, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, DRI, 4026 Debrecen Bem tér 18/C, Hungary k Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60637 Poznan, Poland l Institute of Biology,
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings
    Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings 1 IDNHP Tracked Species Conservation Rankings Date USFS_ USFS_ USFS_ 2 Scientific Name Synonyms Common Name G-Rank S-Rank USFWS BLM Ranked R1 R4 R6 Abronia elliptica dwarf sand-verbena G5 S1 Feb-14 Abronia mellifera white sand-verbena G4 S1S2 Feb-16 Acorus americanus Acorus calamus var. americanus sweetflag G5 S2 Feb-16 Agastache cusickii Agastache cusickii var. parva Cusick's giant-hyssop G3G4 S2 Feb-14 Agoseris aurantiaca var. aurantiaca, Agoseris lackschewitzii pink agoseris G4 S1S2 4 S Feb-16 A. aurantiaca var. carnea Agrimonia striata roadside agrimonia G5 S1 Feb-16 Aliciella triodon Gilia triodon; G. leptomeria (in part) Coyote gilia G5 S1 Feb-20 Allenrolfea occidentalis Halostachys occidentalis iodinebush G4 S1 Feb-16 Allium aaseae Aase's Onion G2G3+ S2S3 2 Oct-11 Allium anceps Kellogg's Onion G4 S2S3 4 Feb-20 Allium columbianum Allium douglasii var. columbianum Columbia onion G3 S3 Feb-16 Allium madidum swamp onion G3 S3 S Allium tolmiei var. persimile Sevendevils Onion G4G5T3+ S3 4 S Allium validum tall swamp onion G4 S3 Allotropa virgata sugarstick G4 S3 S Amphidium californicum California amphidium moss G4 S1 Feb-16 Anacolia menziesii var. baueri Bauer's anacolia moss G4 TNR S2 Feb-20 Andreaea heinemannii Heinemann's andreaea moss G3G5 S1 Feb-14 Andromeda polifolia bog rosemary G5 S1 S Andromeda polifolia var. polifolia bog rosemary G5T5 S1 Feb-20 Anemone cylindrica long-fruit anemone G5 S1 Feb-20 Angelica kingii Great Basin angelica G4 S1 3 Mar-18 Antennaria arcuata meadow pussytoes G2 S1 Mar-18 Argemone munita ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • UDRŽITELNÝ VÝVOJ SVĚTOVÝCH REGIONŮ? Ekologické Vazby Vývoje Lidské Populace a Vegetace SEVERNÍ AMERIKA Vč
    Pavel V a l t r , Jan Š t r o b l UDRŽITELNÝ VÝVOJ SVĚTOVÝCH REGIONŮ? Ekologické vazby vývoje lidské populace a vegetace SEVERNÍ AMERIKA vč. Grónska Encyklopedie SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGIONS OF THE WORLD? Ecological linkages between development of human populations and vegetation NORTH AMERICA incl. Greenland Encyclopaedia Aktualizace 20. 9. 2021 1 2 Úvod / Introduction 4 A. Ekologické souvislosti / Ecological connections 11 A.1. Stav, vývoj a ekologické vazby přírody a lidí / State, evolution and ecological connections between nature and humans 11 A.1.1. Biogeografické členění / Biogeographic classification 11 A.1.2. Příroda a původní obyvatelé severní Ameriky / Nature and original inhabitant 12 A.1.3. Klima a klimatické změny / Climate and climate change 20 A.1.4. Biodiverzita, ochrana přírody: ekosystémová asistenční péče versus ideologie bezzásahovosti k „výrobě divočiny“ ve zkulturněných biotopech, spolupráce s přírodou / Biodiversity, nature conservation: ecosystem assistance care versus ideology of non-intervention heading for “production of wilderness” in the cultivated biotopes, cooperation with nature 23 A.2. Situace popisovaných zemí / Described Countries 29 A.3. České stopy v Severní Americe / Czech footprints in North America 55 B. Přehled rostlin / Survey Plants 61 B.1. Poznámky k seznamu rostlin / Comments to Checklist B.1.1. Celkový pohled na biodiverzitu, struktura zpracování publikace / General view of biodiversity, structure of the publication treatment B.1.2. Seznam použitých zkratek / List of Abbrevitations B.2. Cévnaté rostliny / Tracheophyta 66 Výběr literatury / Bibliography 474 3 ÚVOD / INTRODUCTION Je velmi opovážlivé charakterizovat ekologický vývoj světových regionů a jeho proměny vč. sestavení „lidového“ přehledu květeny světa a dokonce se snažit popisovat trajektorie vývoje přírody ve vazbě na místní i širší ekologické vlivy a měnící se stanovištní a klimatické podmínky.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants on the North Slope | the North Slope Borough
    8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough CALENDAR CONTACT Harry K. Brower Jr. , Mayor COMMON PLANTS ON THE NORTH SLOPE Home » Departments » Wildlife Management » Other Topics of Interest » Common Plants on the North Slope Plants are an important subsistence resource for residents across the North Slope. This page provides information on some of the common plants found on the North Slope of Alaska, including plants not used for subsistence. Plant names (common, scientific and Iñupiaq) are provided as well as descriptions, pictures and traditional uses. The resources used for identification are listed here as well as other resources for information on plants. List of Common Plants and others of the North Slope PDF Version Photo Identification of these Common Plants Unknowns - Got any ideas? Please send them to us! Plant Identification and Other Resources Thes pages are a work in progress. If you see any misinformation, misidentifications, or have pictures to add, please contact us. Information on the Iñupiaq names and traditional uses of these plants is especially welcomed. Check out "Unknown" pictures at bottom of page. Thanks! DISCLAIMER: This guide includes traditional uses of plants and other vegetation. The information is not intended to replace the advice of a physician or be used as a guide for self- medication. Neither the author nor the North Slope Borough claims that information in this guide will cure any illness. Just as prescription medicines can have different effects on www.north-slope.org/departments/wildlife-management/other-topics/common-plants-north-slope 1/3 8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough individuals, so too can plants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Frequent and Typical Plant Communities of the European Alps
    - Alpine Ecology and Environments A guide to frequent and typical plant communities of the European Alps Guide to the virtual excursion in lesson B1 (Alpine plant biodiversity) Peter M. Kammer and Adrian Möhl (illustrations) – Alpine Ecology and Environments B1 – Alpine plant biodiversity Preface This guide provides an overview over the most frequent, widely distributed, and characteristic plant communities of the European Alps; each of them occurring under different growth conditions. It serves as the basic document for the virtual excursion offered in lesson B1 (Alpine plant biodiversity) of the ALPECOLe course. Naturally, the guide can also be helpful for a real excursion in the field! By following the road map, that begins on page 3, you can determine the plant community you are looking at. Communities you have to know for the final test are indicated with bold frames in the road maps. On the portrait sheets you will find a short description of each plant community. Here, the names of communities you should know are underlined. The portrait sheets are structured as follows: • After the English name of the community the corresponding phytosociological units are in- dicated, i.e. the association (Ass.) and/or the alliance (All.). The names of the units follow El- lenberg (1996) and Grabherr & Mucina (1993). • The paragraph “site characteristics” provides information on the altitudinal occurrence of the community, its topographical situation, the types of substrata, specific climate conditions, the duration of snow-cover, as well as on the nature of the soil. Where appropriate, specifications on the agricultural management form are given. • In the section “stand characteristics” the horizontal and vertical structure of the community is described.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volume 8, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treat- ments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recom- mended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu et al. (1992– 2009). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alpha- betically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. There may be citations in this list that have dates suffixed “b” but that are not preceded by citations of “[a]” works for the same year, or that have dates suffixed “c,” “d,” or “e” but that are not preceded by citations of “[a],” “b,” “c,” and/or “d” works for that year.
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]