DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic Technical Report No. 3 About CAFF Theprogram for the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) of the Arctic Council was established lo address the special needs of Arctic ecosystems, species and thcir habitats in the rapid ly developing Arctic region. Itwas initiated as one of'four programs of the Arctic Environmental Protcction Strategy (AEPS) which was adopted by Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Finland, lceland, Norway, Russia, Swcdcn and the United States through a Ministeria! Declaration at Rovaniemi, Finland in 1991. Other programs initi­ ated under the AEPS and overlaken hy the Are.tie Council are the ArcticMonitoring and assessment Programme (AMAP), the program for Emergency Prevention, Preparcd­ ness and Response (EPPR) and the program for Protection of the Arctic Marine Envi­ ronment (PAME). Sinceits inaugural mccti.ng in Ottawa, Canada in 1992, the CAFF program has provided scientists, conscrvation managers and groups, and indigenous people of the north with a distinct forum in which lo tackle a wide range of Arctic conservation issues at the cir­ cumpolar level. CAFF's main goals, which are achieved in keeping with the concepts of sustainable developrnertt and utilisation, are: • to conserve Arctic Jlora and fauna, thcir diversity and thcir habitats; • to protect the Arctic ecosystems from threats; • to improve conservation management laws, reg ulations and practices for the Arclic; • to integrale Arctic interests into global conservation fora. CAFF operates rhrough a system of Designated Agencies and National Representatives responsible for CAFF in thcir rcspcctivc countries. CAFF also has an International Work­ ing Group wh.ith has met annually to assess progrcss and to develop Annual WorkPlans. CAFF is hcadcd up hy a chair and vice-chair which rotatc among the Arctic countries ancl it is supported by an lnternational Secretariat. When needed, CAFF also setsb up specialist and experts groups to handle program areas. The rnajority of CAFFs activities are directed at conserving Arctic biodiversity- the abundance and diversity of Arctic flora, fauna, and habitats- and at integrating indig­ enous people and their knowlcdgc .into CAFF. Some examples are: The development and assistance with implementation of conservation su·atcgies and action plans for a Circumpolar Protccte<l Areas Network (CPAN), for Arctic biological diversity, for cir­ cumpolar murres and eiders; work on a Circumpolar Arctic Vegetalion Map (CAYM) and an Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic; report on Concerns and Long-term Threats to Arctic Biological Diversity; and mapping of Traditional Ecologi­ cal Knowledge. Most of CAFF's work is carried out through a system of Lead Countries as a means of sharing the workload. Some projects are also assigned to the CAFF Secre­ tmiat. Whenever possible, CAFF works in co-operation with other international organisations and associations to achieve co.mmon eonservation goals in tbc Arctic. Atlas of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAPF} Technical Repo1·t No. 3 June 1999 by Stephen S. Talbot Boris A. Yurtsev David F. Murray George. W. Argus Christian Bay and Arve Elvebakk Suggested citation: Talbot, S.S., B.A. Yurtsev, D.F. Murray, G.W. Argus, C. Bay, and A. Elvebakk. 1999. Atlas of rare endemic vascular plants of the Arctic. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAPF) Techu.ical Report No. 3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK. iv + 73 pp. Contents Page TabJes ............................................................................................ .. ........ ...................... ............ ................................. iv Figures ......................................................................................................... ............. ................. .. ................................. iv Abstract ...................................................... ......................................................... .............................. ............................ 1 lntroduction ... ....................... .. ................................................................... ................ ...... ................... .. .......................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Defi.nition of Arctic ...... .............. .............. .................... .................................................. ........................... .................... 2 Concept of Rarity ., , .. •• , •....•....•••..•..•.•••.••.•••• .. ............................................. ............................................. 4 Importance of Rare Arctic Plants ............................................................................................................ .................... 4 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Development of the Species List .................................................................................................................... .............. 7 Taxonomic Considerations .................................................... .... ...................... ..... ... ........................... ................. ..... ..... 7 Gap Analysis .......................... ............................ ... .............. ................................................................................ .......... 8 Excluded Taxa ........................................................................ ....................................................................................... 8 Results .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Summary Statistics ............................................................................... ....................... ............................. ................ ..... 9 Gap Analysis: Relationship Between Species Distrihutions and Habitat Protected Areas ......................................... 9 Systematic List ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Acknowledgments .................................... ....................................... ............................................................................ 37 Glossary .. ! ••••• ••••• 37 Literature Cited ......................................................... ....................... .. ......................................................................... 38 Appendix I. Excluded Taxa ...................................................................................... .................................................. 43 Appendix IL Location of Rare Endemic Vascular Plants of the Arctic by Country and Latitude and Longitude .. ..................... .......................................... ........... ............................................................. ...... .. .... ........ 4 7 Appendix III. Distribution Maps of Individual Rare Endemics ..... ............ .............................................................. 50 iii Tables Numher Page 1 IUCN (1994) Red List threat categories ............................................................................................................... 6 2 IUCN Protected areas management catcgories 1-V ............................................................................................. 8 3 Numbers of rare vascular endemics in cach CAFF country ................................................................................. 9 4 Numbers of rare vascular endcmic taxa of the Arctic in each plant family ......................................................... 9 5 Numbers of rare vascular endemic taxa of the Arctic in lUCN Red List threal categories ............................... 9 6 Num.bers of rare endemic Laxa in each phytogeographic subzone ...................................................................... 10 7 Numbers of rare endemic taxa in floristic provinces and subprovinces 10 8 Unprotected rare endemic vascular plants of the Arctic .................................................................................... 13 9 Partially protccted rare endemic vascular plants of the Arctic ........................................................................... 13 10 Protected rare cndemic vascular plants of the Arctic ......................................................................................... 14 11 Distribution of rare endemic occurrences in rclation to IUCN protected areas management categodes ......... 14 Figures Number Page 1 Circumpolar map of the distribution of rare vascu]ar plants of the Arctic in relation to phyLogeographic subzones ................................................................................................................. .................... 3 2 Circumpolar map of the distribution of rare vascular plants of the Arctic in relation to floristic provinces and subprovinces ................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Circumpolar map of IUCN protected areas I-V .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Polystichum Aleuticum) Field Survey at Atka Island, Alaska
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service INTRA-SERVICE BIOLOGICAL OPINION For 2016 Aleutian Shield Fern (Polystichum aleuticum) Field Survey at Atka Island, Alaska To the Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Field Office Prepared by: Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Anchorage, Alaska July 25, 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2. Description of the Proposed Action .......................................................................................1 Project Overview ...........................................................................................................1 Minimization Measures .................................................................................................3 Action Area ....................................................................................................................3 5. Status of the Species ..............................................................................................................4 6. Environmental Baseline .........................................................................................................6 7. Effects of the Action on Listed Species .................................................................................7 8. Cumulative Effects .................................................................................................................7 9. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Endophytic Fungi: Biological Control and Induced Resistance to Phytopathogens and Abiotic Stresses
    pathogens Review Endophytic Fungi: Biological Control and Induced Resistance to Phytopathogens and Abiotic Stresses Daniele Cristina Fontana 1,† , Samuel de Paula 2,*,† , Abel Galon Torres 2 , Victor Hugo Moura de Souza 2 , Sérgio Florentino Pascholati 2 , Denise Schmidt 3 and Durval Dourado Neto 1 1 Department of Plant Production, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13418900, Brazil; [email protected] (D.C.F.); [email protected] (D.D.N.) 2 Plant Pathology Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13418900, Brazil; [email protected] (A.G.T.); [email protected] (V.H.M.d.S.); [email protected] (S.F.P.) 3 Department of Agronomy and Environmental Science, Frederico Westphalen Campus, Federal University of Santa Maria, Frederico Westphalen 98400000, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-54-99646-9453 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Plant diseases cause losses of approximately 16% globally. Thus, management measures must be implemented to mitigate losses and guarantee food production. In addition to traditional management measures, induced resistance and biological control have gained ground in agriculture due to their enormous potential. Endophytic fungi internally colonize plant tissues and have the potential to act as control agents, such as biological agents or elicitors in the process of induced resistance and in attenuating abiotic stresses. In this review, we list the mode of action of this group of Citation: Fontana, D.C.; de Paula, S.; microorganisms which can act in controlling plant diseases and describe several examples in which Torres, A.G.; de Souza, V.H.M.; endophytes were able to reduce the damage caused by pathogens and adverse conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/061206 Al 21 April 2016 (21.04.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/061206 Al 21 April 2016 (21.04.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agent: BAUER, Christopher; PIONEER HI-BRED IN C12N 15/82 (2006.01) A01N 65/00 (2009.01) TERNATIONAL, INC., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, John C07K 14/415 (2006.01) ston, Iowa 5013 1-1014 (US). (21) International Application Number: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every PCT/US2015/055502 kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (22) Date: International Filing BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 14 October 2015 (14.10.201 5) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (25) Filing Language: English HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (26) Publication Language: English MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (30) Priority Data: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 62/064,810 16 October 20 14 ( 16.10.20 14) US SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. [US/US]; 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Leaf Perennial Catalog.Pdf
    Green Leaf Plants® A Division of Aris Horticulture, Inc. Perennials & Herbs 2013/2014 Visit us @ Green Leaf Plants® GLplants.com Green Leaf Plants® Perennial Management Teams Green Leaf Plants® Lancaster, Pennsylvania Green Leaf Plants® Bogotá, Colombia (Pictured Left to Right) Rich Hollenbach, Grower Manager and Production Planning/Inventory Control (Pictured Left to Right) Silvia Guzman, Farm Manager I Isabel Naranjo, Lab Manager I Juan Camilo Manager I Andrew Bishop, Managing Director I Sara Bushong, Customer Service Manager and Herrera, Manager of Latin American Operations & Sales Logistics Manager Cindy Myers, Human Resources and Administration Manager I Nancy Parr, Product Manager Customer Service Glenda Bradley Emma Bishop Jenny Cady Wendy Fromm Janis Miller Diane Lemke Yvonne McCauley [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Ext. 229 Ext. 227 Ext. 245 Ext. 223 Ext. 221 Ext. 231 Ext. 237 Management, Tech Support and New Product Development Brad Smith Sarah Rasch Sara Bushong, Nancy Parr, Product Mgr. Julie Knauer, Prod. Mgr. Asst Susan Shelly, Tech Support Melanie Neff, New Product Development [email protected] [email protected] C.S. Mgr. & Logistics Mgr. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Ext. 228 800.232.9557 Ext. 5007 [email protected] Ext. 270 Ext. 288 Ext. 238 Ext. 273 Ext. 250 Varieties Pictured: Arctotis Peachy Mango™ Aster Blue Autumn® Colocasia Royal Hawaiian® DID YOU KNOW? ‘Blue Hawaii’ Customer service means more than answering the phone and Delphinium ‘Diamonds Blue’ Echinacea ‘Supreme Elegance’ taking orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium Vitis-Idaea Eileen Schaub [email protected]
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Master's Theses University of Connecticut Graduate School 8-30-2019 Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea Eileen Schaub [email protected] Recommended Citation Schaub, Eileen, "Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea" (2019). Master's Theses. 1434. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/1434 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Connecticut Graduate School at OpenCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea Eileen Patricia Schaub B.A., Western Connecticut State University, 2013 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science At the University of Connecticut 2019 Copyright by Eileen Patricia Schaub 2019 ii Approval Page Master of Science Thesis Floral Preformation in the Warming Boreal Forest: the Effects of Temperature on the Development of Vaccinium vitis-idaea Presented by Eileen P. Schaub, B.A. Major Advisor _________________________________________________________________ Pamela K. Diggle Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Cynthia S. Jones Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Donald Les University of Connecticut 2019 iii Introduction The boreal zone, located between 50 and 70º north latitude, is the largest terrestrial biome, comprising 11% of Earth’s landmass across North America, Europe, and Asia (Brandt, 2009). It consists primarily of coniferous forest, with some deciduous tree species and numerous shrub and grass species.
    [Show full text]
  • Himalaya - Southern-Tibet: the Typical Continent-Continent Collision Orogen
    237 Himalaya - Southern-Tibet: the typical continent-continent collision orogen When an oceanic plate is subducted beneath a continental lithosphere, an Andean mountain range develops on the edge of the continent. If the subducting plate also contains some continental lithosphere, plate convergence eventually brings both continents into juxtaposition. While the oceanic lithosphere is relatively dense and sinks into the asthenosphere, the greater sialic content of the continental lithosphere ascribes positive buoyancy in the asthenosphere, which hinders the continental lithosphere to be subducted any great distance. Consequently, a continental lithosphere arriving at a trench will confront the overriding continent. Rapid relative convergence is halted and crustal shortening forms a collision mountain range. The plane marking the locus of collision is a suture, which usually preserves slivers of the oceanic lithosphere that formerly separated the continents, known as ophiolites. The collision between the Indian subcontinent and what is now Tibet began in the Eocene. It involved and still involves north-south convergence throughout southern Tibet and the Himalayas. This youthful mountain area is the type example for studies of continental collision processes. The Himalayas Location The Himalayas form a nearly 3000 km long, 250-350 km wide range between India to the south and the huge Tibetan plateau, with a mean elevation of 5000 m, to the north. The Himalayan mountain belt has a relatively simple, arcuate, and cylindrical geometry over most of its length and terminates at both ends in nearly transverse syntaxes, i.e. areas where orogenic structures turn sharply about a vertical axis. Both syntaxes are named after the main peaks that tower above them, the Namche Barwa (7756 m) to the east and the Nanga Parbat (8138 m) to the west, in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.5 Climate Change Projections in the Upper Danube (European Alps) and the Upper Brahmaputra (Himalayas)
    6.5 CLIMATE CHANGE PROJECTIONS IN THE UPPER DANUBE (EUROPEAN ALPS) AND THE UPPER BRAHMAPUTRA (HIMALAYAS) Bodo Ahrens∗ and Andreas Dobler IAU, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 1 INTRODUCTION tion (for further details see Dobler and Ahrens, 2008). In the following sections, statistically Coarse-grid global circulation models (GCMs) downscaled ECHAM5 precipitation fields are do not allow for regional estimates of water bal- named ECHAM5-Γ. They have a grid resolution ◦ ance or trends of extreme precipitation. This is of 0.5 . especially true in complex terrain. Therefore, Trends of daily precipitation statistics are cal- downscaling of the global simulations to gen- culated for all four seasons of the years during erate regional precipitation is necessary. This the simulation period 1960-2080. An overview paper discusses dynamical and statistical down- on the precipitation statistics is provided in Ta- scaling in two major river basins (RBs): (1) the ble 1. The wet day threshold is set to be 1 upper Danube river basin (UDRB) covering an mm/d. Beside the two major RBs, 5 sub-areas area of 76’653 km2 in the European Alps and (2) of interest (see Figs. 1 and 2) are considered. the upper Brahmaputra river basin (UBRB) with The sizes of the single areas (in number of grid ◦ about 500’000 km2 in the Himalayas. The dis- points on the 0.44 simulation grids) are: UDRB cussion focuses on simulated changes of daily 51, Lech RB 5, Salzach RB 7, UBRB 275, As- precipitation statistics in the two RBs. sam 47, Lhasa RB 22 and Wang-Chu RB 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan 2012 - 2017
    MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 - 2017 MAK BAY NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE KACHE This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Kachemak Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve is part of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS), established by Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act, as amended. Additional information about the System can be obtained from the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1305 East West Highway – N/ORM5, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Financial support for this publication was provided by grants (#NA09NOS4200124; #NA10NOS4200106) under the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD. ADF&G administers all programs free from discrimination and in compliance with federal and state anti-discrimination laws. For the full text of this statement, or for additional formats, visit http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/ and click on OEO statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PLAN 3 1.2 KBNERR Strategic Focus Areas 4 1.3 SUMMARY of KBNERR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2005-2011 6 2.5.1 Administration and
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Artemisia L. Species from Kazakhstan Based On
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE LATVIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Section B, Vol. 72 (2018), No. 1 (712), pp. 29–37. DOI: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0068 PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF ARTEMISIA L. SPECIES FROM KAZAKHSTAN BASED ON MATK ANALYSES Yerlan Turuspekov1,5, Yuliya Genievskaya1, Aida Baibulatova1, Alibek Zatybekov1, Yuri Kotuhov2, Margarita Ishmuratova3, Akzhunis Imanbayeva4, and Saule Abugalieva1,5,# 1 Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, 45 Timiryazev Street, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN 2 Altai Botanical Garden, Ridder, KAZAKHSTAN 3 Karaganda State University, Karaganda, KAZAKHSTAN 4 Mangyshlak Experimental Botanical Garden, Aktau, KAZAKHSTAN 5 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Biodiversity and Bioresources Department, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN # Corresponding author, [email protected] Communicated by Isaak Rashal The genus Artemisia is one of the largest of the Asteraceae family. It is abundant and diverse, with complex taxonomic relations. In order to expand the knowledge about the classification of Kazakhstan species and compare it with classical studies, matK genes of nine local species in- cluding endemic were sequenced. The infrageneric rank of one of them (A. kotuchovii) had re- mained unknown. In this study, we analysed results of sequences using two methods — NJ and MP and compared them with a median-joining haplotype network. As a result, monophyletic origin of the genus and subgenus Dracunculus was confirmed. Closeness of A. kotuchovii to other spe- cies of Dracunculus suggests its belonging to this subgenus. Generally, matK was shown as a useful barcode marker for the identification and investigation of Artemisia genus. Key words: Artemisia, Artemisia kotuchovii, DNA barcoding, haplotype network. INTRODUCTION (Bremer, 1994; Torrel et al., 1999). Due to the large amount of species in the genus, their classification is still complex Artemisia of the family Asteraceae is a genus with great and not fully completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Literaturverzeichnis
    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.
    [Show full text]