Hazard Monitoring Report.Pdf (English)

Home , Chavuma District, Kafue District, Kalabo, Kaoma District, Mumbwa District, Senanga

VAC

ZAMBIA Vulnerability Assessment Committee

2010/11 FLOODS MONITORING REPORT

THE ZAMBIA VULNERABILITY ASSESMENT COMMITTEE

FEBRUARY 2011

Lusaka

Table of Content

Acknowledgements ...... iii Executive Summary ...... iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1. Background ...... 1 1.2. Objectives ...... 1 1.3. Criteria and Scope of the Floods MonitoringExercise ...... 1 1.4. Methodology ...... 2 1.5. Limitations of the Assessment ...... 2 2. FINDINGS ...... 3 2.1. Precipitation and Hydrology ...... 3 2.2. Human lives at risk ...... 4 2.3. Health ...... 4 2.4. Water and Sanitation ...... 6 2.5. Agriculture and Commercial Activities at Risk ...... 7 2.6 Education ...... 9 2.7 Housing, Public Buildings and Transport Services at Risk ...... 9 3. CONCLUSIONS ...... 11 4. RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 12 Annex 1a: District level Questionnaire ...... 14 Annex 1b: Community Level Questionnaire ...... 19 Annex 2: Team Composition ...... 25 Annex 3: Rainfall Percentage Departure ...... 27 Annex 4: Wards and Households at Risk ...... 28 Annex 5: Districts with Health Centre at Risk in case of Flooding ...... 33 Annex 6: Population of Households at Risk of Water Contamination ...... 36 Annex 7: ANTICIPATED IMPACT ON AGRICULTURE AND COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES ...... 43 Annex 8: Damage to Schools ...... 44 Annex 9: HOUSES AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS AT RISK ...... 46 Annex 10: ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK ...... 48

ii Acknowledgements

The Zambia Vulnerability Assessment Committee wishes to thank the following organizations for facilitating and participating in the Floods Monitoring exercise: • Central Statistics Office (CSO) • Department of Water Affairs (DWA) • Food and Agricultural Organization • Oxfam • United Nations International Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF) • World Food Programme (WFP) • Zambia Meteorological Department (ZMD)

The Committee further wishes to express its gratitude to those institutions that supported the exercise financially and logistically.

iii Executive Summary

Following district reports of rising water levels in rivers, lakes, swamps, dambos and streams, the Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit commissioned a Floods Monitoring exercise in twenty (20) districts in Central, Eastern, Lusaka, Southern, Western and North-Western Provinces to ascertain the risk of flooding. The exercise was undertaken from 10 th to 18 th February, 2011. The overall objective of the Floods Monitoring exercise was to assess the risk of flooding and to establish the sectors at risk.

Of the twenty (20) assessed districts, only Kazungula and Sinazongwe received below normal rainfall for the period under review while Kaoma and Zambezi received above normal rainfall. Significant deviation from the normal rainfall was experienced in Kaoma where a 38% departure was recorded. The rest of the districts received normal rainfall.

Further, analysis of the data collected from the 20 districts indicated that 18% (69, 175 Households) of the total households in the survey area were exposed to flooding. Of the 160 wards that were indicated to be at risk of flooding, 35% (55 wards) were said to be at high risk, 39% (63 wards) at medium risk and the remainder were at low risk. The survey revealed that 11, 094 households (66, 563 people) were at high risk of flooding in 13 of the 20 surveyed districts.

In terms of health, the survey found that the case loads of diseases such as malaria, acute respiratory infection, diarrhoea and other diseases were normal. However, all the assessed districts anticipated an increase in the case loads of these diseases. The availability of health supplies was generally adequate except for mosquito nets and antibiotics. The risk to health infrastructure was not very significant in most of the districts assessed. However, accessibility to these health infrastructures was hampered due to washed away bridges and submerged roads especially in North-Western and Western Provinces.

In terms of the anticipated loss of yield in the staple crops, the Provinces that are most at risk include Southern, Lusaka and Western. Western and North Western provinces recorded the highest risk of anticipated loss on cash crops and livestock sector. It should be noted that the highest reported risk of crop loss on staple food production is around 25% of the planted crop fields in Southern province and below 15% in the next most at risk province of Lusaka. The anticipated cash crop losses were estimated at between 15% and 20% of the planted area.

In the case of education, the data indicated that most of the schools in the surveyed districts of Western Province were already closed due to flooding. The districts where this is the case are Mongu, Kalabo and Senanga. Schools on the West Bank of Chavuma and Zambezi are also likely to get flooded and may cause disruption to the school curricular. Only one school in Sinazongwe indicated that the school was experiencing water contamination and this situation could deteriorate and bring in secondary effects such as cholera which had already been reported in Malima ward.

Some extreme impact situations are however reported in Kaoma district where up to 178 mainly mud and pole houses in the Mayukwayukwa Refugee Camp have collapsed including a distribution centre and 8 church structures have collapsed.

iv It was concluded that although precipitation for most districts was normal, the risk of flooding was there due to their geographical location, topography and the already high water tables due to the past four consecutive seasons of high rainfall. It was also established that Fifty-five (55) wards in 13 districts were found to be at high risk of flooding. It was also established that some districts were already experiencing flooding.

There was a possibility that the case loads of diseases such as malaria, acute respiratory infections and diarrhea were likely to increase. It was established that the availability of health supplies was generally adequate except for mosquito nets and antibiotics. There is a possibility that some health centres will be cut-off as the rain season progresses. Some health infrastructure in Chibombo, Mumbwa and Sinazongwe were reported to be at risk due to lack of maintenance.

There was a large number of people accessing unsafe sources of drinking water which predisposed them to water borne diseases. Sinazongwe was singled out as one district experiencing chemical contamination from the coal mining activities.

Districts in Southern and Western Provinces were already experiencing human-animal conflict due to the smaller grazing lands for both domestic and wild animals. There was a fear of livestock diseases breaking out in Livestock rearing Provinces such as Southern and Western Provinces due to the flooding which some districts are already experiencing.

The survey indicated that there were districts where houses had collapsed. Notable districts were Kaoma, Mongu and Itezhi tezhi. There was generally a big number of infrastructure (roads, bridges and culverts) already requiring attention as most of these are a carry-over from the previous seasons that were also marked by flooding.

The survey recommended continued monitoring of the situation as it evolves so that timely measures are taken should the situation warrant. There is need to provide chlorine and mosquito nets to households in the assessed districts. It was also recommended that there was need for wide dissemination of information on the opening of spill way gates at Kariba and Itezhi tezhi to allow downstream communities to relocate to other areas. There is need to preposition essential medical drugs for those health centres that are likely to be cut-off. There is also need for tentage to be prepositioned in Kaoma, Mongu, Kalabo, Chavuma and Zambezi.

While this assessment has established the need for continued monitoring of the situation in some sectors, certain sectors like infrastructure have already suffered damage due to rains and the number of such infrastructure has increased as no major works have taken place in the last two (2) years. It was thus recommended that Government takes the necessary steps to rehabilitate/ replace the infrastructure in areas where they have been damaged.

It was also recommended that vaccinations of domestic animals be intensified as the threat of disease out-breaks have increased. There was also need to replace washed away bridges and culverts. Furthermore, there is need to drill more boreholes to increase population’s access to safe drinking water.

v 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background

1.2. Objectives

The overall objective of the Floods Monitoring exercise was to assess the risk of flooding was and to establish the sectors at risk.

The specific objectives were as follows: • To establish the amount of rainfall received so far; • To establish the current level and flow of water in the water bodies; • To establish the human lives at risk; • To establish the health infrastructure at risk; • To ascertain the adequacy of medical services; • To establish the risk of water contamination and damage to hydrological structures; • To establish agriculture and commercial activities at risk; • To establish the education infrastructure at risk; • To establish the housing, public buildings and transport services at risk; • To determine appropriate interventions, if any.

1.3. Criteria and Scope of the Floods Monitoring Exercise

The criterion used to select the districts was as follows: • Districts with major rivers, lakes, streams, swamps and dambos; • Amount of precipitation received ; • Districts where floods had already been reported.

Based on the above criteria, the provinces and districts covered in the Floods Monitoring exercise included the following: i. Central Province – Chibombo and Mumbwa ii. Eastern Province - Mambwe iii. Lusaka Province - Kafue and Luangwa iv. Southern Province - Kazungula,Sinazongwe,Siavonga,Mazabuka,Namwala and Itezhi-tezhi v. Western Province – Lukulu, Kaoma, Sesheke, Mongu, Senanga, Kalabo and Shangombo vi. North - Western Province - Chavuma and Zambezi

1 The elements covered in the exercise included precipitation, hydrology, human lives at risk, health, education, water and sanitation, agriculture and commercial services, houses, public infrastructure and transportation services.

1.4. Methodology

The Floods Monitoring exercise employed a qualitative approach in the collection of data. At district checklist was administered in each of the twenty (20) selected districts with the District Disaster Management Committees (DDMCs). From these district meetings, four (4) wards (one of which was a control) were selected for assessment. In each ward a community interview was conducted with 8-12 key informants.

Coordinates of every location where the interviews took place were taken using the Global Positioning System (GPS) in order to triangulate findings with satellite information.

1.5. Limitations of the Assessment

Limitations faced by the assessment teams included the following: • Inaccessibility of certain areas hampering verification of reports; • Difficulties in verifying the reported figures of houses and infrastructure at risk due to time constraint; and • Rainfall and hydrological data was not readily available in most cases at district level.

2 2. FINDINGS

2.1. Precipitation and Hydrology

Figure 1: District Cumulative Rainfall Received as of 10 th February 2011

Although certain districts received below normal to normal rainfall, the risk of flooding was there due to their geographical location. These districts include Kafue, Luangwa, Siavonga, Mazabuka, Sesheke, Namwala, Shangombo, Kalabo, Lukulu, Senanga, Mongu, Kazungula and Itezhi-tezhi. We need to take into consideration that the last four (4) consecutive seasons have been very wet ones and the water table is likely to be high in all the twenty (20) assessed districts.

3 2.2. Human lives at risk

Analysis of the data collected from the 20 districts indicated that 18% (69, 175 Households) of the total households in the survey area were exposed to flooding. Of the 160 wards that were indicated to be at risk of flooding, 35% (55 wards) were said to be at high risk, 39% (63 wards) at medium risk and the remainder were at low risk (see Figure 2 below).

Districts such as Chavuma, Itezhi tezhi, Kalabo, Mongu, Mumbwa, Senanga and Zambezi were indicated to have a high number of wards at high risk. This is so because most of the wards in these districts are mainly situated in swampy areas. In Senanga for instance Kambai ward is situated right in the middle of the swamp and has permanent infrastructure such as schools and clinics. This makes the population resist movement to higher ground.

The survey revealed that 11, 094 households (66, 563 people) were at high risk of flooding in 13 of the 20 surveyed districts (see Annex 4).

2.3. Health

2.3.1 Major diseases likely to emerge with floods

The monitoring exercise found that the case loads of diseases such as malaria, acute respiratory infection, diarrhoea and other diseases were normal. However, all the assessed districts anticipated an increase in the case loads of these diseases. The

4 increase in number of cases will be driven by water contamination caused mainly by faecal matter since the most common sanitary facility in most of the assessed areas is the pit latrine (VAC 2008, 2009, 2010) and also the majority of the people rely on rivers/streams, unprotected shallow wells as their sources of drinking water. In Sinazongwe there were cases of cholera in Malima Ward at Sinamalima Rural Health Centre.

2.3.2 Availability of Health Supplies and Personnel

The availability of health supplies was generally adequate except for mosquito nets and antibiotics. About 10 districts namely Luangwa, Mambwe, Mumbwa, Itezhi tezhi, Kazungula, sesheke, Shangombo, Senanga, Zambezi and Chavuma indicated that they had inadequate stocks of mosquito nets. A further six (6) districts namely Itezhi tezhi, sesheke Shangombo, Kalabo, Zambezi, Chavuma indicated having shortages in antibiotics (refer to table 1 below).

Table 1: Districts reporting Inadequate Health Supplies

No. Health Supplies District with Inadequate supplies

1 Anti Malarial drugs Sesheke , Kalabo, Zambezi, Chavuma

2 Anti biotics Itezhi tezhi, sesheke Shangombo, Kalabo, Zambezi, Chavuma

3 ORS Shangombo, Sesheke, Mambwe

4 Vaccines Sesheke, Zambezi, Chavuma

5 Mosquito Nets Luangwa, Mambwe, Mumbwa, Itezhi tezhi, Kazungula, sesheke, Shangombo, Senanga, Zambezi, Chavuma

The issue of staffing in the health institutions did not come out as a major concern. However Mumbwa, Sinazongwe, Itezhi tezhi, Kazungula, Sesheke, Shangombo, Senanga, Mongu and Kalabo indicated inadequate staffing levels. This is a known sectoral constraint with certain centres being manned by untrained staff.

2.3.3 Health Infrastructure at risk

Risk to health infrastructure was not very significant in most of the districts assessed. However, accessibility to these health infrastructure was hampered due to washed away bridges and submerged roads especially in North Western Province(Chavuma, Zambezi),Western Province (Mongu and Senanga, Shangombo and Sesheke) (refer to Annex 5). Some of the infrastructure in these two Provinces are likely to be cut-off.

5 In Chibombo and Mumbwa some health infrastucutre was reported to be weak due to lack of maintenance as these structures were constructed a long time ago. This predisposes these structures to damage in case of excessive rainfall.

2.4. Water and Sanitation

2.4.1. Risk of Water Contamination

Of the assessed districts, less than 25% of the people had access to safe drinking water. The large percentage of people with lack of access to drinking water is due to use of unsafe water sources such as stream/river/lake and shallow wells which are flooded in some districts.

The districts with a high risk of water contamination included Chibombo, Mambwe, Kafue, Luangwa, Chavuma, Zambezi, Sinazongwe, Namwala Kazungula, Kaoma, Lukulu, Mongu, Senanga, Kalabo, Sesheke and Shangombo (refer to table 2). The risk of water contamination may lead to an increase in water borne diseases.

Risk of chemical contamination was generally low for most assessed districts. However, Sinazongwe indicated a high risk of chemical contamination from the coal mining activities in the area.

Table 2: Districts with Sources and Risks of water contamination

Province District Main source of Drinking Risk of water Water contamination Central Chibombo Unprotected wells, High Boreholes Mumbwa Unprotected wells Low Eastern Mambwe Stream/ Rivers/ lakes High Lusaka Kafue Stream/ Rivers/ lakes, High Piped Luangwa Stream/ Rivers/ lakes, High Boreholes North - Chavuma Unprotected wells, High western Streams/Rivers/lakes Zambezi Unprotected wells, High Streams/Rivers/lakes Southern Siavonga Streams/Rivers/lakes Low Mazabuka Low Sinazongwe High Itezhi tezhi Unprotected wells Low Namwala Unprotected wells High Kazungula Streams/Rivers/lakes High

6 Table 2: Districts with Sources and Risks of water contamination

Province District Main source of Drinking Risk of water Water contamination Western Kaoma Unprotected wells High Lukulu Streams/Rivers/lakes Hi gh Mongu Streams/Rivers/lakes, High unprotected wells Senanga Streams/Rivers/lakes, High unprotected wells Kalabo Streams/Rivers/lakes High Sesheke Streams/Rivers/lakes, High unprotected wells Shangombo Streams/Rivers/lakes High

2.4.2 Risk of damage to Hydrological Structures (Infrastructure)

All the districts indicated no risk of damage of their hydrological structures. In Lusitu area of Siavonga district flooding has resulted in the non-availability of piped water due to submergence of three water pumps at the Sub Centre pump station.

2.5. Agriculture and Commercial Activities at Risk

Whilst flooding and water logging are the common hazard being experienced across the assessed areas, some districts are experiencing a double tragedy of the risk of flooding and prolonged dry spells. The districts facing the double tragedy include Siavonga, and Kazungula in Southern province, Shangombo and Sesheke districts in Western province and Kafue in Lusaka Province. Some parts of these districts have recorded low precipitation that has resulted into wilting of crops.

In terms of the anticipated loss of yield in the staple crops, the Provinces that are most at risk include Submerged Maize field in Chiawa Southern, Lusaka and Western. Western and North Western provinces recorded the highest risk of anticipated loss on cash crops and livestock sector (See figure 3 below). It should be noted that the highest reported risk of crop loss on staple food production is around 25% of the planted crop fields in Southern province and below 15% in the next most at risk province of Lusaka. The anticipated cash crop losses were estimated at between 15% and 20% of the planted area.

7 Figure 3 : Impact on Agricu lture and Commercial Activities Crops such as maize, millet and sorghum as well as cassava are rotting due to water logging. The banana plantations in Siavonga and Kafue districts are heavily affected by water logging in some places and water stress in other areas due to disrupted irrigation systems. The banana fields in Chiawa area of Kafue district and Kapululira (Jordan) area of Siavonga district are also affected by a leaf disease that is resulting into yellowing and browning of leaves. Water logging and water stress have both disrupted the chemical spraying regimes for the banana farmers leading to fears of heavy negative impact on the anticipated incomes. Some farmers in Mumbwa district reported late and erratic supply of fertilizer inputs and this has adversely affected the crop performance and size of land planted.

Water logging of the grazing lands has led to fears of possible disease outbreaks as the animals get to graze in water logged areas and are concentrated in smaller grazing lands. Furthermore, this brings the domesticated animals in close contact with wild animals thus promoting cross vector transmission.

This was observed in most livestock rearing areas including Western and Southern provinces. Feared disease outbreaks include Contagious Bovine Pleural Pneumonia (CBPP), Hemorrhagic Septicaemia, Blackleg, Anthrax and Corridor disease. At the time of the assessment, the risk on aquaculture was very low.

In the Itezhi-tezhi and Namwala and other game management areas, there are reported increases in the animal-human conflict as wild animals have moved into the uplands in search of food and dry land, endangering the lives of the people living in these areas and also causing damage to crop fields. The assessment established that animal movement into or closer to human settlements have happened earlier this year as compared to other years. This has resulted into distraction of young crop stands that cannot be harvested as a control measure. This is expected to further reduce the anticipated overall yields and consequently impact household food security.

8 2.6 Education

The data indicated that most of the schools in the surveyed districts of Western Province were already closed due to flooding (see Annex 9 below). The districts where this is the case are Mongu, Kalabo and Senanga. Schools on the West Bank of Chavuma and Zambezi are also likely to get flooded and may cause disruption to the school curricular. Only one school in Sinazongwe indicated that the school was experiencing water contamination and this situation could deteriorate and bring in secondary effects such as cholera which had already been reported in Malima ward. Furthermore, most community schools had weak infrastructure which makes them susceptible to damage.

2.7 Housing, Public Buildings and Transport Services at Risk

2.7.1 Houses and Public Buildings

A lot of houses were affected in most of the assessed areas. It is worth noting that most of these affected houses are made of mud and pole. In addition, most of the affected houses were localized in areas prone to flooding such as the Bulozi Flood Plains in Western province and other flood plains on the banks of the Zambezi and Kafue rivers as well as their tributaries. In Zambezi and Chavuma districts, the collapse of the houses was mainly due to heavy rains.

In Western province where the impact was highest, it should be noted that the affected areas were located in the flood plains and people who reside there have dual settlements with the primary settlements in the upper land and the secondary one in the plains (See figure 4 below).

Figure 4: Impact on Houses Some extreme impact situations are however reported in Kaoma district where up to 178 mainly mud and pole houses in the Mayukwayukwa Refugee Camp have collapsed including a distribution centre and 8 church structures have collapsed.

Another case was reported in Itezhi tezhi area of Southern Province where 4 teachers’ houses have collapsed and the teachers are currently occupying a classroom block due to lack of alternative shelter.

9 2.7.2 Transport Infrastructure and Services at Risk

From the districts assessed, the highest flood impact on transportation in terms of number of infrastructure affected was Western followed by North Western, Central and Southern. The highest number of bridges affected was recorded in Central and Western provinces with Southern province recording the highest number of culverts affected.

Figure 5: Damage to Road Infrastructure Additionally, bridges and roads particularly those constructed by and using communities were even more susceptible and easily damaged due to poor workmanship and use of unsuitable construction materials such as poles. These structures exhibited various forms of damage ranging from wash- aways, missing deck members, submerged timber decks, decayed timber members, embankment failures and road submergence. It is important to note that the damage to transportation infrastructure is a combination of floods, vandalism and delayed or lack of rehabilitation of washed away structures from the previous rainy seasons as this has greatly contributed to the increased structural damage to infrastructure in the provinces resulting in wash-aways, embankment failures and eroded approach roads. Most of the areas cut off as a result of the failure of these structures include schools, rural health centers, village settlements, agricultural farming blocks and routes to agricultural products market.

The rising water levels and increased currents on the Zambezi have resulted into ferry services being discontinued in Chavuma district at the crossing point to Lukowe; in Senanga district at Kalongola pontoon and Zambezi district at Mize pontoon. This has affected the smooth movement of goods and services as well as people in the affected areas of these districts.

There is a potential threat to operations of the mobile clinics (mainly provision of ART services) in Chiawa Ward in Kafue district that might soon be cut off if the flooding continues.

10 3. CONCLUSIONS

The following were the conclusions from the monitoring exercise: a. Although precipitation for most districts was normal, the risk of flooding was there due to their geographical location, topography and the already high water tables due to the past four consecutive seasons of high rainfall. b. Fifty-five (55) wards in 13 districts were found to be at high risk of flooding. It was also established that some districts were already experiencing flooding. c. There was a possibility that the case loads of diseases such as malaria, acute respiratory infections and diarrhea were likely to increase in all the assessed districts. d. It was established that the availability of health supplies was generally adequate except for mosquito nets and antibiotics. About 10 districts namely Luangwa, Mambwe, Mumbwa, Itezhi tezhi, Kazungula, sesheke, Shangombo, Senanga, Zambezi and Chavuma indicated that they had inadequate stocks of mosquito nets while a further six (6) districts namely Itezhi tezhi, sesheke Shangombo, Kalabo, Zambezi, Chavuma indicated having shortages in antibiotics. e. There is a possibility that some health centres in North Western Province (Chavuma, Zambezi) and Western Province (Mongu and Senanga, Shangombo and Sesheke) will be cut-off as the rain season progresses. f. Some health infrastructure in Chibombo, Mumbwa and Sinazongwe were reported to be at risk of damage due to lack of maintenance. g. There were a large number of people accessing unsafe sources of drinking water which predisposed them to water borne diseases in all assessed districts. Sinazongwe was singled out as one district experiencing chemical contamination from the coal mining activities. h. The Provinces that are most at risk of loss of yield in the staple crop included Southern, Lusaka. Certain districts such as Siavonga, Kafue and Kazungula in Southern Province and Shangombo and Sesheke in Western Province were experiencing both dry spells and flooding in selected wards thereby leading to crop damage. i. Banana fields in Chiawa (Kafue) and Kapulurila (Siavonga) were affected by a leafy disease. j. Districts in Southern and Western Provinces were already experiencing human- animal conflict due to the smaller grazing lands for both domestic and wild animals. k. There was a fear of livestock diseases breaking out in Livestock rearing Provinces such as Southern and Western Provinces due to the flooding which some districts are already experiencing. l. The survey indicated that there were districts where houses had collapsed. Notable districts were Kaoma, Mongu and Itezhi tezhi. m. There was generally a big number of infrastructure already requiring attention as most of these are a carry-over from the previous seasons that were also marked by flooding in all assessed districts.

11 4. RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1. Short – term

a. There is need to continue monitoring the situation as it evolves so that timely measures are taken should the situation warrant. b. There is need to provide chlorine in all assessed districts and mosquito nets to households in the 10 districts that have a shortage. c. There is need for wide dissemination of information on the opening of spill way gates at Kariba and Itezhi tezhi to allow downstream communities to evacuate their areas. d. There is need to preposition essential medical drugs for in health centres in North Western and Western Provinces which are likely to be cut-off. e. There is need for tentage to be prepositioned in Kaoma, Mongu, Kalabo, Chavuma and Zambezi. f. Vaccinations of domestic animals in Southern and Western Provinces needs to be intensified as the threat of disease out-breaks have increased. g. Replace washed away bridges and culverts in all assessed districts.

4.2. Medium to Long – term

a. Drill more boreholes to increase population’s access to safe drinking water. b. Need to restock the medical supplies in the health centres in Itezhi tezhi, sesheke Shangombo, Kalabo, Chavuma and Zambezi . c. There is need to construct culverts and bridges on important roads and major rivers/streams on points where there are temporary ones. d. There is need to put up weather stations in all districts where these are absent. e. Construct water monitoring boreholes to monitor the levels of ground water in the district. f. There is need for Government to take the necessary steps to rehabilitate/ replace the infrastructure in areas where they have been damaged in all the districts.

ANNEXES

13 Annex 1a: District Level Questionnaire

Office of the Vice President Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit

Floods Monitoring Questionnaire – District Level

O. IDENTIFICATION

O.1 LOCATIONS O.2 DATE PROVINCE O.3 LIST OF DDMC MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE DISTRICT 1. 7. 2. 8. 3. 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. O.5 NAME OF INTERVIEWER A. PRECIPITATION AND HYDROLOGICAL LEVELS Average rainfal l received for the last 5 2010/11(Average rainfall received so

years far)

A1. Precipitation

Average for the Last 5 years 2010/11 (current situation)

A2. Hydrology Flow

Name of the Water Bodies………………………… Level

Remarks:

B HUMAN LIVES AT RISK

B2. NAME THE VILLAGES/COMMUNITIES AT RISK IN THESE B3.ESTIMATED WARD WARDS POPULATION % AT RISK B1. PLEASE STATE THE WARDS THAT ARE AT RISK OF FLOODING

B.4 MAJOR DISEASES LIKELY TO EMERGE WITH FLOODING

NORMAL CASE LOAD PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED CASES REMARKS FLOOD

MALARIA

DIARRHEA

ARI

MEASLES

OTHER (SPECIFY)

C. HOUSING, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND TRANSPORT SERVICE AT RISK

C.1 HOUSES & PUBLIC BUILDINGS AT RISK

WARD NUMBER COMMENT (Current condition of infrastructure or any other comment)

Houses

Community Center

Gov Offices

Others

C.2 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AT RISK

Name Ward where Infrastructure is located Condition of Infrastructure Current condition of prior to th e rains infrastructure

Main Road into district center

15 Other Important Roads 1.

Railway

Bridges 1.

Culverts 1.

Airports / Airfields

Others (Specify)

D. WATER AND SANITATION

D1.Common Sources of drinking Water 0-25% 75-100% 50-75% 25-50%

River or lake

Unprotected Well

Protected Well

Borehole

Piped Water

0-25% 75-100% 50-75% 25-50%

D2.Population with access to safe drinking water

D3.RISK OF WATER CONTAMINATION Low Medium High Very High

Faecal

Pesticides

Other(specify)

D4. Risk of damage to hydrological structures (Infrastructure) Low Medium High Very High

Dams

Weirs

16 E. HEALTH

E1. HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK Ward Name of Facility Condition of (Current facility prior condition of to the rains facility or any other comment)

Health Posts

Rural Health Centres

Hospitals

E2. HEALTH SUPPLIES AND PERSONNEL MEDICATION Quantity Available Comment (Indicate 1 = Adequate, 2 = Inadequate)

Anti-malarial drugs

Antibiotics

ORS

Vaccines

Availability of health supplies

ART

Mosquito Nets

Others:

Staffing levels Comment

(Indicate 1 = Adequate, 2 = Inadequate)

Availability of healthcare personnel

17 F1. EDUCATION

SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK

Type of School Ward Name of School Number of Pupils in School

High Schools

Basic Schools

Community Schools

F2. EDUCATION

SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK

Type of School Ward Name of School Condition of school Current condition of school prior to the rains and any other comment

High Schools

Basic Schools

Community Schools

G. AGRICULTURE & COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AT RISK

Percentage Loss Anticipated 75-100% 50-75% 25-50% 0-25% Comment Staple crop fields

Cash crop fields

Livestock: Cattle

Livestock: Goat

Livestock: Pig O. IDENTIFICATION

Poultry O.1 LOCATIONS O.2 DATE

AquaculturePROVINCE O.3 LIST OF RESPONDENTS DISTRICT MALE FEMALE

StorageWARD and preservation

VILLAGEOther( specify)

Annex 1b: Community Level Questionnaire

Offi ce of the Vice President Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit

Floods Monitoring Questionnaire – Community Level

O.5 NAME OF INTERVIEWER

A. PRECIPITATION AND HYDROLOGICAL LEVELS Comments

A1. How is the rainfall performance in term of rainfall received so far compared to the last five years (Average rainfall received (Indicate 1= Normal 2= High 3= Low) A2. How is the water levels in the stream/river now compared to the same period in the last five years (Indicate 1= Normal 2= High 3= Low) A3. How is the water Flow in the stream/river now compared to the same period in the last five years (Indicate 1= Normal 2= High 3= Low)

B HUMAN LIVES AT RISK

B1. MAJOR DISEASES LIKELY TO EMERGE WITH FLOODING(Obtain information from Health Centres)

NORMAL CASELOAD PRIOR TO FLOOD ANTICIPATED CASES REMARKS

MALARIA

DIARRHEA

ARI

MEASLES

OTHER(SPECIFY)

C. HOUSING, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND TRANSPORT SERVICE AT RISK

C.1 HOUSES & PUBLIC BUILDINGS AT RISK

NUMBER COMMENT (if any)

Houses

Community Center

Gov Offices

20 Others

C.2 TRANSPORTATION SRVICES AT RISK

Name Ward where Infrastructure is located Condition of Current Condition Infrastructure prior of Infrastructure to the rains

Main Road from district center to area

Other Important Roads 3.

Railway

2. Bridges

2. Culverts

Airports / Airfields

Others (Specify)

D. WATER AND SANITATION

0-25% 75-100% 50-75% 25-50%

D1. Common Sources of drinking Water

River or L ake

Unprotected Well

Protected Well

Borehole

Piped Water

Use proportional Piling

0-25% 75-100% 50-75% 25-50%

D2. Population with access to safe drinking water

Low Medium High Very High D3.RISK OF WATER CONTAMINATION

Faecal

Pesticides

Other (specify)

Low Medium High Very High D4. Risk of damage to hydrological structures (Infrastructure)

Dams

Weirs

E. HEALTH

Name of Facility Condition of facility prior to Current Condition of Facility E1. HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK the rains and any other Comment

Health Posts

Rural Health Centres

Hospitals

MEDICATION Quantity Available Comment E2. HEALTH SUPPLIES AND PERSONNEL (Indicate 1 = Adequate, 2 = Inadequate)

Anti -malarial drugs

Antibiotics

Availability of health supplies ORS

Vaccines

ART

Mosquito Nets

Others:

Staffing levels Comment

(Indicate 1 = Adequate, Availability of healthcare personnel 2 = Inadequate)

F. EDUCATION

F1. SCHOOL INF RASTRUCTURE AT RISK

Type of School Name of School Number of Pupils in School

High Schools

Basic Schools

Community Schools

F2. SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK

Type of School Name of School Number of Pupils in School Condition of school prior to the Condition of school and any rains other comment

High Schools

Basic Schools

23 Community Schools

24 Annex 2: Team Composition

NO. PROVINCE DISTRI CTS TEAM MEMBERS 1 North Western Chavuma and Zambezi Team Leader : Mr. Boyd Siyanga (DMMU)

Team Members: Mr. George Njobvu (DWA) Mr. Kameya Manjomba (ZMD)

2 Western Lukulu and Kaoma Team Leader : Mr. Cosmas Chalo (DWA)

Team Members: Mr. Chad Mukuta (ZMD) Mr. Manyando Simataa (DWA)

3 Western Senanga and Mongu Team Leader: Mr. Trust Hamaleka (CSO)

Team Members: Mr. Dire Mukubesa (ZMD) dept of water affairs

4 Western Kalabo Team Leader: Mr. Vincent Mungalu

Team Members: Mr.Christopher Mutau (ZMD) dept of water affairs

5 Western and Sesheke, Shangombo and Kazungula Team Leader: Mr . Nathan Tembo Southern Team Members: Mr. Munalula Mate (ZMD) Mr. Royd Chinjenge (DWA)

25 NO. PROVINCE DISTRI CTS TEAM MEMBERS 6 Southern Namwala and Itezhi -tezhi Team Leader: Mr . Ephraim Mambwe

Team Members: Ms. Elizabeth Siwana (ZMD) Mr. Chisanga Sisala (DWA)

7 Southern Sinazongwe and Mazabuka Team Leader: Mr. Virgirio C.N. Mukuka (DWA)

Team Members: Ms. Namakau Muyunda (ZMD)

8 Lusaka and Kafue and Siavonga Team Leader: Mr . Bwendo Kabanda ( Oxfam ) Southern Team Members: Mr. Chongo Katupa (DC) Mr. Mwansa (DWA)

9 Eastern and Mambwe and Luangwa Team Leader: Mr . Titus Ng’andu (DMMU) Lusaka TEAM MEMBERS: Mr. Mukhuzo Chongo (DWA) Mr. John Londolo (ZMD)

10 Central Chibombo and Mumbwa Team Leader: Ms. Linda Nyasulu (CSO)

TEAM MEMBERS: Mr. Brigadire Libanda (ZMD) Mr.Chilika Ngona (DWA)

26 Annex 3: Rainfall Percentage Departure

Cumulative 30 Year Rainfall 1st Cumulative Normal Jul 2010 -10 Rainfall for Percentage Province District Feb 2011 February Dekad 1 Departure Central Chibombo 610 674 -9 Central Mumbwa 693 701 -1 Eastern Mambwe 628 646 -3 Lusaka Kafue 571 581 -2 Lusaka Luangwa 534 608 -12 Southern Kazungula 446 536 -17 Southern Sinazongwe 482 597 -19 Southern Siavonga 565 588 -4 Southern Mazabuka 537 622 -14 Southern Namwala 673 648 4 Southern Itezhi-tezhi 713 745 -4 Western Lukulu 800 706 13 Western Sesheke 486 535 -9 Western Mongu 707 673 5 Western Senanga 592 580 2 Western Kalabo 665 643 3 Western Shangombo 511 551 -7 Western Kaoma 918 665 38 North-Western Chavuma 788 724 9 North-Western Zambezi 850 736 15

27 Annex 4: Wards and Households at Risk

Number of Wards Level of % at Total Estimated No. District at Risk Wards at Risk Risk Risk Households Hhlds at Risk 1 Mazabuka 3 Kasengo Moderate 0.28 1382 387 Itebe High 0.65 536 348 Lubombo High 0.5 4420 2210 Sub-total 0.48 2945 2 Sinazongwe 4 Malima High 0.45 1301 585 Sinazongwe Moderate 0.5 2226 1113 Mweezya Moderate 0.5 3665 1833 Nkandabwe Moderate 0.4 1398 559 Sub-total 0.47 4090 Nyatanda 3 Chavuma 7 Nyambingila High 0.60 464 278 Kambuya Mukelangombe High 0.45 778 350 Sanjongo High 0.50 276 138 Lukolwe Musunga High 0.25 242 61 Lingundu High 0.55 240 132 Nguvu High 0.60 295 177 Chambi Mandalo High 0.35 511 179 1315 Sub-total 0.50 4 Zambezi 8 Muyembe High 0.40 393 157 Likungu High 0.50 1121 561 Cinyingi Mapachi High 0.60 758 455 Mwange Nyawanda High 0.40 646 258 Matondo Nyachikayi High 0.40 618 247 Liyovu High 0.50 1032 516 Lukunyi High 0.65 837 544 Dipalata High 0.40 1042 417 0.52 3155 5 Mumbwa 5 Nalubanda High 0.30 1789 537 Nalusanga High 0.40 1745 698 Milandu High 0.25 2292 573 Chabota High 0.20 955 191 Choma Moderate 0.20 1523 305

Sub-total 0.22 2303

28 Number of Wards Level of % at Total Estimated No. District at Risk Wards at Risk Risk Risk Households Hhlds at Risk 6 Chibombo 9 Kakoma Moderate 0.30 3306 992 Katuba Low 0.25 3214 804 Liteta Low 0.25 3476 869 Mashikili Moderate 0.40 3820 1528 Kabile Low 0.20 1691 338 Chisamba Low 0.20 4634 927 Lunjofwa Low 0.30 1268 380 Chikobo Low 0.20 1059 212 Chibombo Low 0.20 1785 357 Sub-total 0.23 6407 7 Lukulu 10 Likapai Moderate 0.20 315 63 Nyala High 0.40 665 266 Muyondoti High 0.50 657 329 Mbanga Moderate 0.10 1061 106 Kawaya Moderate 0.20 904 181 Lukau Moderate 0.25 753 188 Kangoti Moderate 0.20 1308 262 Chinonwe High 0.40 389 156 Kashizhi High 0.45 1384 623 Simakumba Moderate 0.15 910 137 Sub-total 0.33 2309 8 Kaoma 10 Litoya Moderate 0.30 1680 504 Mulamatila Low 0.10 4572 457 Naliele Low 0.20 1440 288 Shinkombwe Low 0.15 1356 203 Namafulo Low 0.20 3401 680 Luambuwa Low 0.20 1497 299 Kapili Low 0.10 449 45 Namilangi Low 0.10 4085 409 Nkenga Low 0.15 1807 271 Mulwa Moderate 0.25 846 212 Sub-total 0.17 3368 9 Kalabo 12 Libonda High 0.45 1919 864 Mapungu High 0.4 834 334 Sishekanu High 0.4 2379 952 Tuuwa High 0.5 1098 549 Licha High 0.4 1776 710 Lwambi High 0.6 348 209

29 Number of Wards Level of % at Total Estimated No. District at Risk Wards at Risk Risk Risk Households Hhlds at Risk Mwenyi High 0.45 778 350 Kandambo High 0.5 732 366 Lueti High 0.4 1892 757 Sub-total 0.45 5090 10 Itezhi tezhi 6 Kabulungwe High 0.60 385 231 Nyambo High 0.50 433 217 Banamwanze High 0.40 501 200 Basanga High 0.60 1389 833 Lubanda Moderate 0.40 1274 510 Itumbi Moderate 0.30 1156 347 Sub-total 0.44 2338 11 Namwala 5 Ndema Moderate 0.50 1522 761 Nakamboma Low 0.25 2112 528 Namwala Central Low 0.25 2367 591.75 Kabulamwanda Low 0.25 1268 317 Moobola Low 0.25 2044 511 Sub-total 0.30 2709 12 Luangwa 4 Dzalo Moderate 0.06 417 25 Phwazi Moderate 0.02 200 4 Mankhokwe Moderate 0.77 126 97 Mandombe Moderate 0.06 151 9 M’kaliva Moderate 0.40 180 72 Sub-total 0.24 135 13 Mambwe 4 Chikowa Moderate 0.30 898 269 Mnkhanya Moderate 0.37 1547 572 Kakumbi Moderate 0.18 2973 535 Nsefu Moderate 0.32 1779 569 Sub-total 0.29 1946 14 Mongu 11 Mabili High 0.85 812 690 Lumbo High 0.80 1020 816 Kama High 0.75 673 505 Limulunga Moderate 0.50 3007 1504 Yeta Moderate 0.70 1478 1035 Katongo Moderate 0.50 2297 1149 Namengo High 0.80 762 610 Mutondo Moderate 0.50 690 345 Lealui High 0.90 1213 1092 Nakanyaa High 0.80 1468 1174

30 Number of Wards Level of % at Total Estimated No. District at Risk Wards at Risk Risk Risk Households Hhlds at Risk Kaande Low 0.30 378 113 0.67 9032 15 Senanga 13 Kambai High 1.00 1367 1367 Mwanambuyu Moderate 0.50 2300 1150 Makoka High 0.70 1319 923 Muoyo High 0.80 1152 922 Nanjucha High 0.70 1394 976 Imatongo Moderate 0.40 1666 666 Imatanda Moderate 0.20 3853 771 Naluywa Moderate 0.70 1294 906 Lipuwe High 0.60 2069 1241 Kataba Moderate 0.40 930 372 Wanyau Moderate 0.50 1009 505 Lyamakumba High 0.70 2291 1604 Silowana Moderate 0.50 1387 694 Sub-total 0.56 12096 16 Kafue 5 Mungu High 0.5 2918 1459 Chikupi Moderate 0.16 226 36 Kambale Moderate 0.27 1058 286 Chiyaba Moderate 0.14 1203 168 Chinyanja High 0.45 2156 970 Sub-total 0.43 2919 17 Siavonga 4 Nanyanga Moderate 0.2 518 104 Ngombe Ilede Moderate 0.25 2396 599 Musaya Moderate 0.3 1093 328 Manchanvwa Moderate 0.25 946 237 Sub-total 0.32 1267 18 Kazungula 4 Sikaunzwe Moderate 0.1 1716 172 Ngwezi High 0.35 2053 719 Mandia High 0.4 2222 889 Sekute Moderate 0.05 692 35 Sub-total 0.28 1814 19 Sesheke 9 Mambumbu Moderate 0.10 888 89 Mwandi Moderate 0.09 874 79 Lwanja Moderate 0.10 729 73 Machile Moderate 0.17 742 126 Kalobolelwa Moderate 0.11 1166 128 Luampungu Moderate 0.08 1041 83

31 Number of Wards Level of % at Total Estimated No. District at Risk Wards at Risk Risk Risk Households Hhlds at Risk Mulobezi Moderate 0.06 946 57 Imusho Moderate 0.16 527 84 Mulimambango Moderate 0.05 4331 217 Sub-total 0.11 441 20 Shang'ombo 9 Mulamba Moderate 0.10 327 33 Mutomena Moderate 0.20 2328 466 Kaungamashi Moderate 0.20 1068 214 Mbeta High 0.40 2649 1060 Mambolomoka High 0.3 2461 738 Mulonga Moderate 0.10 2012 201 Kalongola Moderate 0.20 586 117 Sikabenga Moderate 0.30 1855 557 Beshe Moderate 0.20 560 112 Sub-total 0.20 3497

TOTAL 69,175

32 Annex 5: Districts with Health Centre at Risk of Damage in case of Flooding

District Ward Name of Health Centre Risk

Mumbwa Nalusanga Nalubamba Building are in bad condition and might risk being damaged to Structures in case flooding

Chunga Building are in bad condition and might risk being damaged to Structures in case flooding

Nakangoli Building are in bad condition and might risk being damaged in case flooding

Kapepe Building are in bad condition and might risk being damaged in case flooding

Nalubamba Machabi Building are i n bad condition and might risk being damaged in case flooding

Chibombo Kabile Mbosha Rural Health Cracked walls Centre

Chaloshi Twalumba Rural Health Cracked walls Centre

33 District Ward Name of Health Centre Risk

Sinazongwe Malima Sina Malima Health Centre Building in bad condition and risk being damaged in case flooding

Chiyabi Health Centre Building in bad condition and risk being damaged in case flooding

Sinazongwe Sinazongwe Health Centre Building in bad condition and risk being damaged in case flooding

34 Annex 6: Districts with Health Centre at Risk of Being Cut-off due to Flooding

District Ward Name of Health Centre Risk

Mazabuka Itebe Itebe Health Post Flooding, centre will be cut off

Shang’ombo Sitomena Liabonga Rural Health centre Flooding, centre will be cut off

Senanga Nalolo Kambai Rural Health centre Flooding, centre will be cut off

Mongu Lealui Lealui Rural Health Centre Flooding, centre will be cut off

Ipongo Itumbwe Rural Health Centre Flooding, centre will be cut off

Kalabo Lueti, Flooding, cen tre will be cut off

Mambolomoka Flooding, centre will be cut off

Kuuli Flooding, centre will be cut off

Nyengo Flooding, centre will be cut off

Lukulu Nyala Nyaala Rural Health Centre Flooding, centre will be cut off

Mwito Manyankwa Rural Healt h Flooding, centre Centre will be cut off

Chavuma All West bank All Health Posts Flooding, centre Wards will be cut off

Zambezi All West bank All Health Posts Flooding, centre Wards will be cut off

35 Annex 7: Population of Households at Risk of Water Contamination

Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination

Mazabuka 3 Kasengo High 0.5 1382 691

Itebe High 0.5 536 268

Lubombo High 0.5 4420 2,210

Sub-total 3,169

Sinazongwe 4 Malima High 0.5 1301 651

Sinazongwe Moderate 0.2 2226 445

Mweezya low 0.05 3665 183

Nkandabwe High 0.5 1398 699

Sub-total 1,978 Nyatanda Chavuma 7 Nyambingila High 0.5 464 232

Kambuya Mukelangombe High 0.5 778 389

Sanjongo High 0.5 276 138

Lukolwe Musunga High 0.5 242 121

Lingundu High 0.5 240 120

Nguvu High 0.5 295 148

Chambi Mandalo High 0.5 511 256

Sub-total 1,403

Zambezi 8 Muyembe High 0.5 393 197

Likungu High 0.5 1121 561

Cinyingi Mapachi High 0.5 758 379

Mwange Nyawanda High 0.5 646 323

36 Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination

Matondo Nyachikayi High 0.5 618 309

Liyovu High 0.5 1032 516

Lukunyi High 0.5 837 419

Dipalata High 0.5 1042 521

3,224

Mumbwa 5 Nalubanda Moderate 0.2 1789 358

Nalusanga Low 0.05 1745 87 Moderate Milandu 0.2 2292 458 Moderate Chabota 0.2 955 191 Moderate Choma 0.2 1523 305

Sub Total 1,399

Chibombo 9 Kakoma high 0.5 3306 1,653

Katuba High 0.5 3214 1,607

Liteta High 0.5 3476 1,738 Moderate Mashikili 0.2 3820 764 Moderate Kabile 0.2 1691 338 Moderate Chisamba 0.2 4634 927 Moderate Lunjofwa 0.2 1268 254 Moderate Chikobo 0.2 1059 212 Moderate Chibombo 0.2 1785 357

Sub-total 7,849 Moderate Lukulu 10 Likapai 0.2 315 63

Nyala High 0.5 665 333

Muyondoti High 0.5 657 329

37 Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination Moderate Mbanga 0.2 1061 212 Moderate Kawaya 0.2 904 181 Moderate Lukau 0.2 753 151 Moder ate Kangoti 0.2 1308 262

Chinonwe High 0.5 389 195

Kashizhi High 0.45 1384 623

Simakumba Moderate 0.5 910 455

Sub- total 2,802

Kaoma 10 Litoya High 0.5 1680 840

Mulamatila High 0.5 4572 2,286

Naliele High 0.5 1440 720

Shinkombwe High 0.5 1356 678

Namafulo High 0.5 3401 1,701

Luambuwa High 0.5 1497 749

Kapili High 0.5 449 225

Namilangi High 0.5 4085 2,043

Nkenga High 0.5 1807 904

Mulwa High 0.5 846 423

Sub-total 10,567

Kalabo 12 Libonda High 0.5 1919 960

Mapungu High 0.5 834 417

Sishekanu High 0.5 2379 1,190

Tuuwa High 0.5 1098 549

Licha High 0.5 1776 888

Lwambi High 0.5 348 174

38 Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination

Mwenyi High 0.5 778 389

Kandambo High 0.5 732 366

Lueti High 0.5 1892 946

Sub-total 5,878 Moderate Itezhi tezhi 6 Kabulungwe 0.2 385 77 Moderate Nyambo 0.2 433 87 Moderate Banamwanze 0.4 501 200

Basanga Low 0.05 1389 69

Lubanda Moderate 0.2 1274 255

Itumbi High 0.5 1156 578

Sub-total 1,266

Namwala 5 Ndema High 0.5 1522 761

Nakamboma High 0.5 2112 1,056

Namwala Central Low 0.05 2367 118

Kabulamwanda High 0.05 1268 63

Moobola High 0.5 2044 1,022

Sub-total 3,021

Luangwa 4 Dzalo High 0.5 417 209

Phwazi High 0.5 200 100

Mankhokwe High 0.5 126 63

Mandombe High 0.5 151 76

M’kaliva High 0.5 180 90

Sub-total 537

Mambwe 4 Chikowa High 0.3 898 269

Mnkhanya High 0.5 1547 774

39 Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination

Kakumbi High 0.5 2973 1,487

Nsefu High 0.5 1779 890

Sub-total 3,419

Mongu 11 Mabili High 0.5 812 406

Lumbo High 0.5 1020 510

Kama High 0.75 673 505

Limulunga High 0.5 3007 1,504

Yeta High 0.5 1478 739

Katongo High 0.5 2297 1,149

Namengo High 0.5 762 381

Mutondo High 0.5 690 345

Lealui High 0.5 1213 607

Nakanyaa High 0.5 1468 734

Kaande High 0.3 378 113

Sub-Total 6,992

Senanga 13 Kambai High 1 1367 1,367

Mwanambuyu High 0.5 2300 1,150

Makoka High 0.5 1319 660

Muoyo High 0.5 1152 576

Nanjucha Moderate 0.2 1394 279 Moderate Imatongo 0.2 1666 333 Moderate Imatanda 0.2 3853 771 Moderate Naluywa 0.2 1294 259

Lipuwe High 0.6 2069 1,241 Moderate Kataba 0.2 930 186

40 Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination Moderate Wanyau 0.2 1009 202

Lyamakumba High 0.2 2291 458

Silowana Moderate 0.2 1387 277

Sub-total 7,759

Kafue 5 Mungu High 0.5 2918 1,459

Chikupi High 0.5 226 113

Kambale Moderate 0.2 1058 212

Chiyaba Low 0.05 1203 60

Chinyanja High 0.45 2156 970

Sub-total 2,814

Siavonga 4 Nanyanga Low 0.05 518 26

Ngombe Ilede Moderate 0.2 2396 479

Musaya Moderate 0.2 1093 219

Manchanvwa Moderate 0.2 946 189

Sub-total 913

Kazungula 4 Sikaunzwe Moderate 0.2 1716 343

Ngwezi Moderate 0.2 2053 411

Mandia High 0.5 2222 1,111

Sekute Low 0.05 692 35

Sub-total 1,899

Sesheke 9 Mambumbu Moderate 0.2 888 178

Mwandi High 0.5 874 437

Lwanja Moderate 0.2 729 146

Machile High 0.05 742 37

Kalobolelwa Moderate 0.2 1166 233

41 Number Estimated of Wards at Risk of Total Households at Wards water Level of % at Households at Risk of water District at Risk Contamination Risk Risk risk Contamination

Luampungu Moderate 0.2 1041 208

Mulobezi High 0.5 946 473

Imusho Moderate 0.2 527 105

Mulimambango High 0.05 4331 217

Sub-total 2,034

Shang'ombo 9 Mulamba High 0.5 327 164

Mutomena High 0.5 2328 1,164

Kaungamashi High 0.5 1068 534

Mbeta High 0.5 2649 1,325

Mambolomoka High 0.5 2461 1,231

Mulonga High 0.5 2012 1,006

Kalongola High 0.5 586 293

Sikabenga High 0.5 1855 928

Beshe High 0.5 560 280 Sub-total 0.5 6,923 Total 75,844

42 Annex 8: Anticipated Impact on Agriculture and Commercial Activities

Estimated Percentage Loss

Province District Staple Cash Livestock Aquaculture Comments crop Crop

Chibombo 0-25

Central Mumbwa 0-25

Eastern Mambwe 0-25

37 50 -75 0-25 Maize, Sorghum as staple, Kafue banana is cash crop

Lusaka Luangwa 0-25 0-25

Chavuma 25 -50 N/ Western Zambezi 0-25

Lukulu 0-25 0-25 25 -50

Kaoma 0-25 0-25 25 -50 25 -50

Kalabo 0-25 25 -50

Mongu 25 -50

Senanga 25 -50

Sesheke 0-25 0-25

Western Shangombo 0-25 0-25

Itezhi -tezhi 0-25

Mazabuka 0-25 25 -50 Livestock affected are goats

Namwala 25 -50 0-25

Kazungula 0-25

0-25 25 -50 Sorghum is staple, banana is Siavonga cash crop

Southern Sinazongwe 25 -50

43 Annex 9: Damage to Schools

District Name of School Type of School Type of Damage

Kazungula Kachabula Basic Roofs blown

Sesheke Sikabenga Basic Roofs blown

Nyantanda, Kambuya and Kayinda Chavuma Basic Likely to be flooded

Chambi and Lukolwe Comunity

Zambezi Likungu and Makondo Basic Likely to be flooded

Salondo,Nakaywe, Basic Makuku, Lealui Mongu Already closed due to flooding Malabo, Liyoyelo, Ngombala, Likutwe, Nelamo, Mulumbo Community

Nalolo, Namwanyi, Basic Ukolo, Lituna, Mande, Senanga Already closed due to flooding Lubambwandinde, Commtunity Lulambo, Lwambi, Imafuwa

Nalubanda Basic Likely to suffer damage as structure is dilapidated Mumbwa Nalusanga Community Weak structure and likely to suffer damage

Chibombo Chibombo Community Weak structure and likely to suffer damage

Luangwa Mangerengere Community Likely to be flooded

Kalabo Namweti Basic Already closed due to flooding

Itezhi tezhi Lyanda Basic Classroom and 4 teacher s’ houses had roofs blown off

Namwala Moobola Basic Roof to classroom blown

44 District Name of School Type of School Type of Damage

Lukulu Likapai, Nalondi, Mwito, Basic Likely to suffer damage Imenda, Lyalala, Njungu, Lukulu, Kamuli, Mutungi, Silonga, Lutano, Lukau, Lyande, Mbumi, Kashidi, Namakando, Mbangweta, Chinonwe, Lupili, Lundole and Kavungu

Kaoma Nalumino Mundia, Basic Likely to suffer damage Chibuli, Samukenya, Miowa, Kamanya, Shingungungu, Lipako, Kandengo, Kalumeyoyo and Kashinzi

Mazabuka Siatwindi Basic Roof blown off

Sinazongwe Sinazeze Basic Water contamination

45 Annex 10: HOUSES AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS AT RISK

Province District Type of Number Comments Infrastructure affected

houses 20 Collapsed in Mushikili and Katuba Chibombo Wards

Central Mumbwa - -

Eastern Mambwe

Kafue Houses 2 Submerged to above foundation level

Lusaka Luangwa Houses

Chavuma Houses 12 Collapsed and affected people already integrated

N/ Zambezi Houses 19 From 4 Wards – affected already Western integrated locally

Houses 15 Highly at risk. Houses submerged to Lukulu window level

Houses 38 In Mayukwayukwa Refugee Camp collapsed Churches 8 Churches within Museta Community Distribution 1 collapsed centre Distribution centre at Mayukwa Kaoma Refugee camp collapsed

Kalabo

Houses 28 Collapsed houses in Bulozi Plains

Public institution 1 Local Court premises collapsed in Mongu Lealui

Senanga Houses 50 Collapsed houses in plains

Sesheke Houses 10 Collapsed

Western Shangombo Houses 30 Collapsed

Houses 4 Teachers’ houses at Iyanda school Itezhi-tezhi collapsed

Southern Mazabuka Houses 12 In Kasengo Ward collapsed

46 Province District Type of Number Comments Infrastructure affected

Namwala Houses 5 Collapsed

Kazungula Houses 16

Siavonga Houses

Sinazongwe Houses 14

47 Annex 11: ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE AT RISK

Province District Roads Bri dges/ Culverts Comments

Chitanda - Muswishi Bridge Roads and bridges in very Malambanyama road bad condition. Kakoma Bridge Liteta-Shimbilo road Chaminkulwa Lyansa road Bridge

Chibombo Four Ways road Chunga Bridge

Nalubanda -Nampundwe Namalawe bridge Roads and bridges both in very bad condition. Culverts Chungu-Nalusanga Kapepe bridge on some points do not exist Chombwa-Nangoma Nansenga bridge

Central Mumbwa Shibuyunji-Nampundwe Chunga bridge

Chilombwe - M’kaliva Completely c ut off due to Road flooding. Assessment of the road required after floods Eastern Mambwe subside.

Gotagota School road Submerged and washed away sections Chikupi road Damaged and impassable Chongwe lesser Bridge Kafue Damaged and impassable

The D145 road in very bad condition and cut off in D145 some sections within the township. M’kaliva cut off Chilombwe - M’kaliva from Chilombwe Lusaka Luangwa Road

Chavuma M8 Currently Impassable to heavy vehicles

N/ Zambezi All roads to the West Impassable as p arts washed Western bank away

Katunda - Watopa Nalusheke Roads washed away and the bridges seriously eroded. Lukulu –Mbanga Mulongo Most of these at high risk of collapse if flooding Sitaka-Watopa Shikundula Western Lukulu continues

48 Province District Roads Bri dges/ Culverts Comments

Lukulu -Washishi Chombwe

Lukulu- Muyondoti Litumo

Sipalo Maloba road parts cut off; Namapombwe and Nabowa cut off due to Luena bridge wash away at

Mayukwayukwa Kaoma Sipalo- Maloba road Luena River Bridge

Highly cracked may give in soon Mongu Kalabo road Kalabo Sikongo Bridge The Mongu Kalabo road is Kalabo inaccessible

Liande, Lukweta, Sasenda Bridges All feeder roads to these Nasange, Nakanya communities are flooded and South, Mwanawina, Litawa and impassable; Nomai Nakanya bridges All bridges are damaged and Liande Bridge washed away; Lealui on verge of collapse Mongu Lealui Bridge

Kalabo - Senanga Kaungalweti Both roads and bridges are washed away. Kalongola- Senanga Kakenge 1 and 2

Sibukali- Senanga Kataba bridges

Kalongola road Senanga culverts

Ngweze – Imus ho Machile All r oads impassable .

Nang’ombe – Lumbe Limpumpu All bridges likely to submerge soon. Sesheke Makanga – Machile Sibisibi Mulobezi

Shangombo – Matebele Kaungamashi Both roads damaged in sections Nagweshi - Sinjembela Bridge damaged and Shangombo impassable

Itezhi Tezhi – Namwala; Bachele All roads are impassable; Itezhi Tezhi – Mgoma, Southern Itezhi-tezhi Nkanawa – Namwala; Basanga All bridges washed away

49 Province District Roads Bri dges/ Culverts Comments

D769

Tebe, Munenga and Munenga and All roads Impassable; Mazabuka Kalama Muchinga culverts blocked

Feeder roads Namunwe and Most feeder roads Chitongo impassable; bridges washes Namwala away sides

Makwaza Road Impassable now

Makunte Road Impassable

Kazungula Mulobezi Railway Very bad though still used

Chiinde Road Lu situ Bridge Roads damaged and impassable; bridge has Siavonga Chikuwe Road washed away parts

Maamba -Batoka Bridges and Though recently tarred, is culverts highly pot holed with gullies Sinazeze-Chiyabi and edges washed away

Maamba-Kafwambila Most of the bridges and culverts on these roads are Maamba-Sulwego Sinazongwe washed away

Note : Detailed technical assessments will be required for purposes of costings.