Book review The elements of murder A history of poison John Emsley Oxford University Press. New York, New York, USA. 2005. 421 pp. $30.00. ISBN: 0-19280-599-1 (hardcover). Reviewed by Donna Mendrick Gene Logic Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA. E-mail:
[email protected] John Emsley has written an entertain- Yet there are some weaknesses in the book. lar statements that should have been cor- ing book entitled The elements of murder: a The introductory chapter lists an extensive rected in the editing process. For example, history of poison. He is a chemist who spent history of alchemists, and although this he concludes in the last sentence relating many years as a researcher and lecturer lends credibility to the author’s research, it to the British Empire that “lead cannot be at London University before becoming is dry reading, and the selected elements are blamed” for its rapid decline yet states that a popular science writer. This enjoyable profiled more extensively later in the book. “some future historian will conclude . book is devoted to the poisonous elements Not to worry, though. The reader becomes that lead was the reason.” found in the periodic table. His descrip- engrossed by the second chapter as it delves Even with these lapses, the book is enjoy- tion of the chemicals is encompassing into details on mercury. Another concern able. Included is a letter written in 1786 by and will interest chemists, physicians, and is the limited reference list and citations, Benjamin Franklin stating that the dan- knowledgeable readers of murder myster- which require the reader to rely on Ems- gers of lead have been known for at least ies.