DOCSLIB.ORG

James Anderson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Anderson James Anderson World Bank –University of Rhode Island United States Dr. James Anderson leads the World Bank’s Global Program on Fisheries and Aquaculture. He previously chaired the Department of Environmental & Natural Resource Economics at the University of Rhode Island. Dr. Anderson was also the editor of Marine Resource Economics from 1999 through 2011. His recent work has focused on the role of seafood in food security, constraints to aquaculture development and seafood market analysis. FISH 2030 and Shrimp Production Review James L. Anderson, The World Bank Diego Valderrama, University of Florida Mimako Kobayashi, The World Bank Siwa Msangi, Internaonal Food Policy Research Ins8tute 2 Overview Fish 2030 – Supply and Demand Shrimp Producon 3 “Fish to 2030” Modeling Project • Collaboraon: The World Bank, Internaonal Food Policy Research Ins8tute (IFPRI), University of Arkansas, and FAO • Projec8on of global supply and demand for fish and fish meal & oil using IFPRI’s IMPACT Model • Capture and aquaculture supply modeled • Model expanded since “Fish to 2020” Project o Country groups: 36 115 o Seafood groups: 4 16 4 How the Model Works • Calibrated using FAO data for 1984-2009 • Exogenous factors shi\ supply and demand curves • In each country, Produc8on + Imports = Consump8on + Exports • Equilibrium is reached when S = D globally 5 DefiniXon of Regions 6 Commodity Groups 7 Total Fish ProducXon: 1984-2030 8 Aquaculture Growth 2010 (Data) 2030 (Model) • Approx. 41% of total • Approx. 51% of total harvest harvest • Approx. 49% of fish for • Approx. 64% of fish for human consump8on human consump8on • Aquaculture growth • Aquaculture growth 2000-2010 – 79% in 10 yrs 2010-2030 – 66% in 20 yrs • Growth in total supply • Growth in total supply 2000-2010 – 17% in 10 yrs 2010-2030 – 28% in 20 yrs 9 Aquaculture’s Share in Total Harvest Total Harvest 189.1 Million Tons 10 Other Aquaculture Forecasts 120 Growing fisheries (0.7% per annum) 100 Stagnant fisheries ) • Global consumption rises to 22.5 kg/y 80 tonnes • Global consumption remains at 1996 levels (15.6 kg/y) 60 Fish 40 Production (million (million Production •Technological advances in aquaculture 20 •Baseline scenario •Ecological collapse of fisheries 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Year Ye (1999) IFPRI (2003) FAO (2004) Wijkstrom (2003) Source: Hall, S. Blue Frontiers (2011), WorldFish Centre Supply Growth (Capture + Aquaculture) • More than 50% increase from 2008 to 2030 . Tilapia . Pangasius . Carp . Salmon . Shrimp • 20-40% increase from 2010 to 2030 . Crustaceans . Molluscs . Other Fresh Fish . Other Marine Fish 12 Sources of Aquaculture Supply Growth By Commodity • More than 100% increase 2008 to 2030 . Tilapia . Shrimp . Demersal . Other marine Fish • 50-100% increase 2008 to 2030 . Pangasius . Carp . Crustaceans . Molluscs . Salmon . Tuna 13 Supply Growth (Capture + Aquaculture) By Region • More than 20% increase 2008 to 2030 . China . Southeast Asia . India . Other South Asia . Lan America . Cent./West Asia & North Africa • Less than 10% increase 2008 to 2030 . Europe . North America . Sub-Saharan Africa . Other Asia & Pacific (Korea, etc.) . Japan 14 Consumpon Growth • More than 50% increase 2006 to 2030 . China . India . Other South Asia . Cent./West Asia & N. Africa • Less than 20% increase 2006 to 2030 . Southeast Asia . Sub-Saharan Africa . North America . Lan America • Regions with ligle growth or decline . Other Asia & Pacific . Europe . Japan 15 Impact of HypotheXcal Disease Outbreak Scenario: Disease outbreak in Asia shrimp aquaculture in 2015 Assump8ons: •producon declines by 35% in 2015 relave to the default projecon for 2015 •Recovery to the default projec8on for 2015 takes 5 years •Subsequently resume the original growth path 16 Scenario Results: Impacts on Shrimp ProducXon 14.6% drop 17 Long vs. Near Term Forecast • Projec8ons with IMPACT Model are based on aggregate and historical data o Useful for deriving global-level forecast o Useful for deriving long-term forecast o But limited foresight into country and species specific details • Next: Complementary informaon from survey of industry and country experts 18 GOAL 2012 Shrimp ProducXon Survey Issues & Challenges GOAL 2012 Survey Shrimp Aquaculture ProducXon by World Region: Million MT 1992 - 2014 2012- 2014 Projected annual 4.5 2006 - 2010 growth rate: 4.9% Annual growth rate: 5.0% -9.7% 4.0 Other 3.5 Africa/MidEast Americas 3.0 India/Bangladesh China 2.5 Southeast Asia 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources: FAO (2012) for 1992-2010; GOAL (2012) for 2011-2014. Note: M. rosenbergii is not included. Shrimp Aquaculture by Major Producing Regions: 2006 – 2014 Million MT 1.8 1.5 China data include both marine and freshwater production of P. vannamei 1.2 2006-2010 data are from FAO (2012). 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 Southeast Asia China India/Bangladesh Americas Africa/MidEast 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Note: M. rosenbergii is not included. Shrimp Aquaculture by Major Producing Regions: 2006-2010 vs. 2010-2014 Average Annual Growth Rate 14% 12.20% 12% 2006-2010 2010-2014 10% 7.60% 8% 5.30% 4.80% 6% 4.60% 4% 3.00% 2.40% 2% 0% -2% -1.90% -1.20% -4% -6% -6.00% -8% Southeast Asia China India/Bangladesh Americas Africa/MidEast Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Note: M. rosenbergii is not considered. Shrimp Aquaculture in Asia: 2006 – 2014 Million MT 1.8 China data include both marine and freshwater 1.5 production of P. vannamei 2006-2010 data are from FAO (2012). 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India Bangladesh 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Note: M. rosenbergii is not included. Shrimp Aquaculture in Asia: 2006-2010 vs. 2010-2014 Average Annual Growth Rate 18% 14.90% 15% 2006-2010 2010-2014 12% 9% 7.60% 8.20% 6% 3.50% 2.80% 2.80% 3% 0% -1.20% -3% -2.90% -6% -4.40% -6.10% -9% China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Note: M. rosenbergii is not considered. Shrimp Aquaculture in LaXn America: 2006 – 2014 Thousand MT 240 200 2006-2010 data are from FAO (2012). 160 120 80 40 0 Ecuador Mexico Brazil Colombia Honduras Nicaragua 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Note: M. rosenbergii is not included. Shrimp Aquaculture in LaXn America: 2006-2010 vs. 2010-2014 Average Annual Growth Rate 36% 29.20% 30% 2006-2010 2010-2014 24% 18% 11.90% 12% 10.60% 11.20% 7.40% 6% 1.80% 1.70% 0.20% 0% -1.80% -6% -4.40% -12% -12.60% -18% -24% -20.00% Ecuador Mexico Brazil Colombia Honduras Nicaragua Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Note: M. rosenbergii is not considered. GOAL 2012 Survey World Shrimp Aquaculture (including M. rosenbergii) Million MT by Species: 1992 - 2014 68% 4.2 72% 71% 65% 3.6 65% Percentages indicate the 3.0 share of P. vannamei. 52% 2.4 1992-2010 data: FISHSTAT (2012). 2012-2014 data: GOAL estimates. 1.8 1.2 15% 0.6 0.0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 P. vannamei P. monodon M. rosenbergii Other Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). Trends in U.S. Shrimp Import Prices 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 2000 USD/lb 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 - 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <15/lb 31-40 >70/lb Peeled Composite Source: USDC/NMFS (2012) GOAL 2012 Survey Shrimp Aquaculture (including M. rosenbergii) in Asia by Species: 1992 - 2014 Million MT 64% 3.6 68% 60% 67% 3.0 Percentages indicate the 60% share of P. vannamei. 2.4 46% 1992-2010 data: FISHSTAT (2012). 1.8 2011-2014 data: GOAL estimates. 19% 1.2 0.6 0.0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 P. vannamei P. monodon M. rosenbergii Other Sources: FAO (2012) & GOAL (2012). World Landings of Wild-Caught Shrimp by Species Others/NS Million MT 3.6 Atlantic seabob (Xiphopenaeus kroyeri) 3.2 Common shrimp (Crangon crangon) Northern white shrimp 2.8 (Penaeus setiferus) Argentine red shrimp 2.4 (Pleoticus muelleri) Banana prawn (Penaeus 2.0 merguiensis) Fleshy prawn (Penaeus chinensis) 1.6 Giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon) 1.2 Southern rough shrimp (Trachipenaeus curvirostris) 0.8 Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) 0.4 Akiami paste shrimp (Acetes japonicus) 0.0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Source: FAO (2012). World Producon of Shrimp Million MT Capture Fisheries & Aquaculture 55% 7.0 6.0 Aquaculture accounted for 55% 5.0 of world shrimp supplies in 2010. 28% 4.0 3.0 26 % 2.0 1.0 0.0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Capture Fisheries Aquaculture Source: FAO (2012). Notes: M. rosenbergii is not included. China includes freshwater production of P. vannamei. World Producon of Shrimp by Species Capture Fisheries & Aquaculture Combined Million MT 7.0 39 % Others/NS P. vannamei is the most important species in the world, 28 % 6.0 P. merguiensis with virtually all production coming from aquaculture. Percentages indicate the share 5.0 P. chinensis of P. vannamei.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fishery for Northern Shrimp (Pandalus Borealis) Off West Greenland, 1970–2019
    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR(S) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N7008 NAFO SCR Doc. 19/044 NAFO/ICES PANDALUS ASSESSMENT GROUP—November 2019 The Fishery for Northern Shrimp (Pandalus borealis) off West Greenland, 1970–2019 by AnnDorte Burmeister and Frank Rigét Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland Abstract The Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) occurs on the continental shelf off West Greenland in NAFO Divisions 0A and 1A–1F in depths between approximately 150 and 600 m. Greenland fishes this stock in Subarea 1, Canada in Div. 0A. The species is assessed in these waters as a single stock and managed by catch control. The fishery has been prosecuted over time by four fleets: Greenland small-vessel inshore; Greenland KGH offshore; Greenland recent offshore, and Canadian offshore. Catch peaked in 1992 at 105 000 tons but then decreased to around 80 000 tons by 1998 owing to management measures. Increases in allowed takes were subsequently accompanied by increased catches. The logbook recorded catches in 2005 and 2006, around 157 000 tons, were the highest recorded. Since then catches has decreased to a recent low level in 2015 at 72 256 tons. In the following years, both TACs and catches increased, and the total catches was 94 878 tons in 2018. The enacted TAC for Greenland in 2019 is set at 103 383 tons and a TAC of 1 617 tons were set for Canada, by the Greenland Self-government. The projected catch for 2019 is set at 100 000 tons.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrimp: Wildlife Notebook Series
    Shrimp Five species of pandalid shrimp of various commercial and subsistence values are found in the cool waters off the coast of Alaska. Pink shrimp (Pandalus borealis) are the foundation of the commercial trawl shrimp fishery in Alaska. Pinks are circumpolar in distribution, though greatest concentrations occur in the Gulf of Alaska. Ranging from Puget Sound to the Arctic coast of Alaska, the humpy shrimp (P. goniurus) is usually harvested incidentally to pink shrimp. In some cases, however, the humpy constitutes the primary species caught. Both pink and humpy shrimp are usually marketed as cocktail or salad shrimp. Known for its sweet flavor, the sidestripe shrimp (Pandalopsis dispar) is also caught incidentally to pinks; however, there are small trawl fisheries in Prince William Sound and Southeast Alaska which target on this deeper water species. The coonstripe shrimp (Pandalus hypsinotis) is the prized target of various pot shrimp fisheries around the state. Coonstripe shrimp can be found from the Bering Sea to the Strait of Juan de Fuca while sidestripes range from the Bering Sea to Oregon. Spot shrimp (P. platyceros) is the largest shrimp in the North Pacific. Ranging from Unalaska Island to San Diego, this species is highly valued by commercial pot fishers and subsistence users alike. Most of the catch from the sidestripe, coonstripe, and spot fisheries is sold fresh in both local and foreign markets. General description: Pandalid shrimp can be characterized by a long, well-developed spiny rostrum and are medium to large in size. The body is generally slender and there are five pairs of "swimmerets" located on the underside of the abdomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandalus Borealis (Krøyer, 1838)
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Species Fact Sheets Pandalus borealis (Krøyer, 1838) Black and white drawing: (click for more) Synonyms Dymas typus Krøyer, 1861 Pandalus borealis typica Retovsky, 1946 FAO Names En - Northern prawn, Fr - Crevette nordique, Sp - Camarón norteño. 3Alpha Code: PRA Taxonomic Code: 2280400203 Scientific Name with Original Description Pandalus borealis Kroyer, 1838, Naturhist.Tidsskr., 2:254. Geographical Distribution FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Launch the Aquatic Species Distribution map viewer North Atlantic: Spitsbergen and Greenland south to the North Sea and to Massachusetts (U.S.A.). North Pacific: Bering Sea to S.E. Siberia, Japan and Oregon (U.S.A.).The taxonomic status of the North Pacific form, usually considered a subspecies Pandalus borealis eous Makarov, 1935, is not fully clear yet. Habitat and Biology Depth 20 to 1 330 m.Bottom clay and mud. Marine. Size Maximum total length 120 mm (male), 165 mm (female). Interest to Fisheries Commercially this is one of the most important carideans of the North Atlantic; only Crangon crangon may be more important. Longhurst (1970:258) called it the principal product of the prawn fisheries of the northwestern Atlantic, being concentrated off Greenland, while in more recent years also more to the south fisheries for the species have started, e.g., in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of Maine (as far south as Gloucester, Mass.). There is an intensive fishery around Iceland and a most important one off the Norwegian coast. In the Kattegat and Skagerak it is fished for by Danish trawlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandalus Platyceros Range: Spot Prawn Inhabit Alaska to San Diego
    Fishery-at-a-Glance: Spot Prawn Scientific Name: Pandalus platyceros Range: Spot Prawn inhabit Alaska to San Diego, California, in depths from 150 to 1,600 feet (46 to 488 meters). The areas where they are of higher abundance in California waters occur off of the Farallon Islands, Monterey, the Channel Islands and most offshore banks. Habitat: Juvenile Spot Prawn reside in relatively hard-bottom kelp covered areas in shallow depths, and adults migrate into deep water of 60.0 to 200.0 meters (196.9 to 656.2 feet). Size (length and weight): The Spot Prawn is the largest prawn in the North Pacific reaching a total length of 25.3 to 30.0 centimeters (10.0 to 12.0 inches) and they can weigh up to 120 grams (0.26 pound). Life span: Spot Prawn have a maximum observed age estimated at more than 6 years, but there are considerable differences in age and growth of Spot Prawns depending on the research and the area. Reproduction: The Spot Prawn is a protandric hermaphrodite (born male and change to female by the end of the fourth year). Spawning occurs once a year, and Spot Prawn typically mate once as a male and once or twice as a female. At sexual maturity, the carapace length of males reaches 1.5 inches (33.0 millimeters) and females 1.75 inches (44.0 millimeters). Prey: Spot Prawn feed on other shrimp, plankton, small mollusks, worms, sponges, and fish carcasses, as well as being detritivores. Predators: Spot Prawn are preyed on by larger marine animals, such as Pacific Hake, octopuses, and seals, as well as humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Ocean Wise Approved Canadian MSC Fisheries
    Current Ocean Wise approved Canadian MSC Fisheries Updated: November 14, 2017 Legend: Blue - Ocean Wise Red - Not Ocean Wise White - Only specific areas or gear types are Ocean Wise Species Common Name Latin Name MSC Fishery Name Gear Location Reason for Exception Clam Clearwater Seafoods Banquereau and Banquereau Bank Artic surf clam Mactromeris polynyma Grand Banks Arctic surf clam Hydraulic dredges Grand Banks Crab Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Gulf of St Lawrence snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Scotian shelf snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Newfoundland & Labrador snow crab Pots Newfoundland & Labrador Flounder/Sole Yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea OCI Grand Bank yellowtail flounder trawl Demersal trawl Grand Banks Haddock Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 4X5Y Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Atlantic haddock Melangrammus aeglefinus Canada Scotia-Fundy haddock Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 5Zjm Hake Washington, Oregon and California North Pacific hake Merluccius productus Pacific hake mid-water trawl Mid-water Trawl British Columbia Halibut Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis Canada Pacific halibut (British Columbia) Bottom longline British Columbia Longline Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Gillnet including part of the Grand banks and Trawl Georges bank, NAFO areas 3NOPS, Atlantic Halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Shrimps, Lobsters, and Crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida
    SHRIMPS, LOBSTERS, AND CRABS OF THE ATLANTIC COAST OF THE EASTERN UNITED STATES, MAINE TO FLORIDA AUSTIN B.WILLIAMS SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS Washington, D.C. 1984 © 1984 Smithsonian Institution. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Williams, Austin B. Shrimps, lobsters, and crabs of the Atlantic coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Rev. ed. of: Marine decapod crustaceans of the Carolinas. 1965. Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: SI 18:2:SL8 1. Decapoda (Crustacea)—Atlantic Coast (U.S.) 2. Crustacea—Atlantic Coast (U.S.) I. Title. QL444.M33W54 1984 595.3'840974 83-600095 ISBN 0-87474-960-3 Editor: Donald C. Fisher Contents Introduction 1 History 1 Classification 2 Zoogeographic Considerations 3 Species Accounts 5 Materials Studied 8 Measurements 8 Glossary 8 Systematic and Ecological Discussion 12 Order Decapoda , 12 Key to Suborders, Infraorders, Sections, Superfamilies and Families 13 Suborder Dendrobranchiata 17 Infraorder Penaeidea 17 Superfamily Penaeoidea 17 Family Solenoceridae 17 Genus Mesopenaeiis 18 Solenocera 19 Family Penaeidae 22 Genus Penaeus 22 Metapenaeopsis 36 Parapenaeus 37 Trachypenaeus 38 Xiphopenaeus 41 Family Sicyoniidae 42 Genus Sicyonia 43 Superfamily Sergestoidea 50 Family Sergestidae 50 Genus Acetes 50 Family Luciferidae 52 Genus Lucifer 52 Suborder Pleocyemata 54 Infraorder Stenopodidea 54 Family Stenopodidae 54 Genus Stenopus 54 Infraorder Caridea 57 Superfamily Pasiphaeoidea 57 Family Pasiphaeidae 57 Genus
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 78: 249–253, 2008 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published January 24 doi: 10.3354/dao01867 Dis Aquat Org Short- and long-term dietary effects on disease and mortality in American lobster Homarus americanus Michael F. Tlusty*, Anna Myers, Anita Metzler New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, USA ABSTRACT: The American lobster Homarus americanus fishery is heavily dependent on the use of fish as bait to entice lobsters into traps. There is concern that this food supplementation is nutrition- ally insufficient for lobsters, but previous experiments reported conflicting results. We conducted a long-term feeding experiment in which 1 yr old American lobsters were fed one of 7 diets for a period of 352 d, a time that allowed the lobsters to molt thrice. The diets consisted of fresh frozen herring, a ‘wild’ diet (rock crab, mussel, and Spirulina algae), a formulated artificial diet for shrimp, paired com- binations of these 3 diets or a diet formulated at the New England Aquarium (Artemia, fish and krill meal, Spirulina algae, soy lecithin, vitamins and minerals). The lobsters fed the diet of 100% fish had higher initial molting rates, but within the period of this experiment all either contracted shell disease or died. Mixed diets resulted in higher survival and a lower probability of mortality. This research demonstrated a critical time component to diet studies in lobsters. Short- and long-term impacts of diet differ. In the long term, continual high consumption rates of fish by the lobsters promote poor health in all lobsters, not just those of market size.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Effects of Ocean Acidification, Ocean Warming and Oil Spill on Aspects of Development of Marine Invertebrates
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2016 COMBINED EFFECTS OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION, OCEAN WARMING AND OIL SPILL ON ASPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE INVERTEBRATES Arnberg, maj http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5287 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. COMBINED EFFECTS OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION, OCEAN WARMING AND OIL SPILL ON ASPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE INVERTEBRATES by MAJ ARNBERG A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Marine Science and Engineering Faculty of Science and Technology In collaboration with; International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS) Stavanger, Norway. University of Gothenburg, Sweden. JANUARY 2016 1 COMBINED EFFECTS OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION, OCEAN WARMING AND OIL SPILL ON ASPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE INVERTEBRATES By Maj Arnberg i. Abstract For decades, humans have impacted marine ecosystems in a variety of ways including contamination by pollution, fishing, and physical destruction of habitats. Global change has, and will, lead to alterations in in a number of abiotic factors of our ocean in particular reduced oxygen saturation, salinity changes, elevated temperature (ocean warming or OW) and elevated carbon dioxide (ocean acidification or OA). Now and in the future, OA and OW will operate together with local anthropogenic drivers such as oil pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Effects of Red King Crab Invasion -A Modelling Approach Using Ecopath with Ecosim
    Ecosystem effects of red king crab invasion -a modelling approach using Ecopath with Ecosim by Jannike Falk-Petersen Master Thesis in International Fisheries Management FSK 3910 Norwegian College of Fishery Science University of Tromsø May 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Prof. John Field at the University of Cape Town and Dr. Lynne Shannon at Marine and Coastal Management, Cape Town, for helping me in the initial phase of my thesis. Special thanks to Lynne Shannon for helping me to understand the use and limitations of Ecopath. Thanks to Prof. John Pope for good discussions and getting me in touch with Drs. James Ianelly and Kerim Aydin at the Alaskan Fisheries Science Center who gave me very useful information related to their work on the red king crab and ecosystem models. I would also like to thank my supervisors, Drs. Torstein Pedersen and Einar Nilssen, for feedback on my work and nice cruices to Ullsfjorden, Dr. Tore Haug at the Institute of Marine Research for information on seal diet, Raul Primicerio for good discussions and Frøydis Strand for supply of map and king crab figure. SUMMARY Knowledge on effects of the invasive red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) on the Barents Sea ecosystem is limited. Due to the information available on benthos the Ecopath model of Sørfjord, Northern Norway, was used to investigate possible trophic changes with introduction of king crab to the model. A literature study of the king crab was conducted to find information on diet, mortality, consumption rate and other life history parameters required by the model. A short introduction to biological invasions was also included.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Shrimp, Pandalus Borealis
    Northern shrimp, Pandalus borealis Background Pandalus borealis is one of about 20 Pandalus species world-wide (Komai 1999). While officially known as the northern shrimp (Williams et al. 1989), it is also recognized under several other common names, including pink shrimp (Shumway et al. 1985), deep-sea shrimp (Ito 1976), as well as a prawn rather than shrimp. More local names, such as Maine shrimp (Czapp, 2005), also exist. Until recently it has been regarded as a widely ranging circumarctic species (Williams and Wigley 1977) that extends into northern Pacific and Atlantic regions, here referred to as P. borealis sensu lato. Western populations from the Bering Sea and further south in the Pacific can now be considered a separate species (Squires 1992) based on distinct traits of larvae and adults, here referred to as P. borealis sensu stricto. However, this change has not yet been universally adopted in the literature (Bergström 2000). Within the North Atlantic, P. borealis is known from northern Europe in the eastern Atlantic, and in the western Atlantic from Greenland to about 40ºN latitude (Squires, 1990), just south of the Gulf of Maine. The species is typically found at depths ranging from 10-500 m (Squires, 1990; Pohle, 1988), but is also known from deeper waters (Bergström 1992). Usually these schooling shrimp live on or near soft bottom with high organic content but do exhibit diurnal vertical migration (Shumway et al. 1985). They are found at temperatures ranging from 2 – 14ºC, but occurrences in areas below 0ºC are known (Squires 1968). In Atlantic waters, P. borealis is one of three recognized species of Pandalus that overlap geographically and bathymetrically, but is the only one amongst these with a major commercial fishery (Williams and Wigley 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf of Maine Northern Shrimp (Pandalus Borealis) Fishery: a Review of the Record
    J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci., Vol. 27: 193–226 The Gulf of Maine Northern Shrimp (Pandalus borealis) Fishery: a Review of the Record Stephen H Clark and Steven X Cadrin Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole Laboratory Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Daniel F Schick Maine Department of Marine Resources, Fisheries Research Station West Boothbay Harbor, ME 04575, USA Paul J Diodati Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, Leverett Saltonstall Building 100 Cambridge St,, Boston, MA 02202, USA Michael P Armstrong and David McCarron Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, Annisquam Laboratory 30 Emerson Ave,, Gloucester, MA 01930, USA Abstract The Gulf of Maine fishery for northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) has been a dynamic one, with landings varying greatly in response to resource and market conditions A directed winter fishery developed in coastal waters in the late-1930s, which expanded to an offshore year round fishery in the late-1960s when annual landings peaked at about 13 000 tons in 1969 Landings subsequently declined to very low levels during the mid-1970s as recruitment failed and the stock collapsed, precipitating closure of the fishery in 1977 The resource recovered under restrictive management and was relatively stable at low to moderate levels of exploitation into the 1990s, with several strong year-classes recruiting to the fishery In the mid-1990s, landings and fishing mortality increased sharply and abundance and recruitment have again declined Environmental conditions have played an important role in affecting survival
    [Show full text]
  • Pandalus Borealis
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Pandalus borealis (Northern Shrimp) Priority 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Malacostraca (Crustaceans) Order: Decapoda (Decapods) Family: Pandalidae (Pandalid Shrimps) General comments: General information: http://www.asmfc.org/species/northern-shrimp http://www.maine.gov/dmr/rm/shrimp/index.htm No Species Conservation Range Maps Available for Northern Shrimp SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: Northern Shrimp is currently undergoing steep population declines, which has already led to, or if unchecked is likely to lead to, local extinction and/or range contraction. Notes: Recent Declines: http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/528fa8f12013Northern Regional Endemic: Pandalus borealis's global geographic range is at least 90% contained within the area defined by USFWS Region 5, the Canadian Maritime Provinces, and southeastern Quebec (south of the St. Lawrence River). Notes: Recent Declines: http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/528fa8f12013Northern High Regional Conservation Priority: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Stock Assessments: Status: Decreasing, Status Comment: Given the current condition of the resource (collapsed, overfished, and overfishing occurring) and poor prospects for the near future, the NSTC recommends that the Section implement a moratorium on fishing in 2014. Reference: http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/528fa8f12013NorthernShrimpAssessment.pdf
    [Show full text]