SIO 101. California Coastal Oceanography Lecture 4: Chemicals That Support Biological Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SIO 101. California Coastal Oceanography Lecture 4: Chemicals That Support Biological Production SIO 101. California Coastal Oceanography Lecture 4: Chemicals that support biological production Alvarez-Salgado et al. 2006 Reading: Martz et al. (2014). Dynamic variability of biogeochemical ratios in the Southern California Current System, Geophys. Res. Lett. 10.1002/2014GL059332 Oct. 13th 2020 Chemicals of Interest For Biological Production - -1 Nitrate ( NO3 ): 0 to 40 μmol L (μM; micromolar) 3- -1 Phosphate (PO4 ): 0 – 2.5 μmol L (μM) -1 Silicate (SiO4): 0 to 40 μmol L (μM) -1 Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC, includes CO2): 1900-2200 μmol L (μM) -1 Oxygen (O2): (0) 50-250 μmol L (μM) + -1 Ammonium (NH4 ): 0-3 μmol L (μM) Micronutrients, e.g., iron (Fe): pico to nanomolar - Do you expect NO3 and O2 to vary in a similar manner? Nutrient samples and basic water properties are collected using a CTD-Rosette Do Phytoplankton in the California Current Ecosystem Region (CCE) Adhere to the “Redfield Law?” Martz et al., set out to examine this. 35 km 250 km However, in Martz et al., high frequency measurements were made in-situ What is this Redfield Law? REDFIELD RATIO (average in phytoplankton): (CH2O)106(NH3)16(H3PO4) + 138O2 ó106CO2+ 16HNO3 + H3PO4 + 122H2O Concepts Introduced in the Martz Paper Upwelling redistributes elements essential for biological production Gas exchange alters upwelling “signature” Why the focus on nitrate? Redfield ratio f-ratio What do ratios of upwelling nutrients tell us about all of the above? What is the vertical structure of the nitrate profile in the CCE? (June 2017) - Nitrate Concentration [NO3 ] µM 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 What drives 100 Nitrate the shape of this profile? 200 300 Why isn’t it 400 always zero at the surface? Depth (m) 500 600 Santa Typical 700 Barbara deep Basin water 800 profile 900 Inshore and offshore profiles of dissolved nitrate, phosphate and silicic acid Concentration (µM) Concentration (µM) -10 -10 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 10 10 30 30 Phosphate 50 50 Silicic Acid Nitrite Nitrate 70 70 Ammonium Depth (m) Depth (m) Depth 90 90 Phosphate Silicic Acid 110 110 Nitrite Nitrate 130 Ammonium 130 150 150 Coastal Upwelling Delivers Nutrients to the Surface Ocean Contours: Nitrate (μM N) Upwelling depths Redistribution of upwelled water along the coast . Offshore transport Poleward of transport upwelled of tracer tracer released in the subsurface Tracer release 150- 250 m Combes et al 2013 Nutrient budget for one region At the Santa Barbara Channel Site, for example, it was determined that nitrate supply was mediated by 1. Coastal upwelling (70%) 2. Summer internal waves (9-12%) 3. Winter upwelling (7-12%) 4. Terrestrial runoff (2-15%) Vertical mixing is critical for the nutrient budget of the surface ocean (and processes that act to change the extent of this mixing can have serious consequences for ecosystem productivity) McPhee-Shaw et al. 2008 Concepts Introduced in the Martz Paper Upwelling redistributes elements essential for biological production Gas exchange alters upwelling “signature” Why the focus on nitrate? Redfield ratio f-ratio What do ratios of upwelling nutrients tell us about all of the above? Concepts Introduced in the Martz Paper Upwelling redistributes elements essential for biological production Gas exchange alters upwelling “signature” Why the focus on nitrate? Redfield ratio f-ratio What do ratios of upwelling nutrients tell us about all of the above? Uptake of nitrate in the inshore region is positively correlated with rates of primary production (2011 CCE LTER Cruise) 80.00 1 - 70.00 day 1 - 60.00 g C L 50.00 µ 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 Primary Production 0.00 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Nitrate uptake (into phytoplankton) µM N L-1 day-1 M. Stukel, unpublished Practical reason: There is a nitrate sensor, But nitrate is a good tracer of CCE productivity Nitracline can be used as a measure of the variability of nitrate supply into the euphotic zone, and thus potential euphotic zone productivity Mantyla et al., 2008 Long term indices of primary production are correlated with the concentration of nitrate at the nitracline depth Values represent seasonally-corrected anomalies and smoothed using a 6-month running average over 2004-2016 In situ measured chlorophyll concentration at the depth where chlorophyll reaches its peak Satellite based calculation of net primary production (NPP) ~nitracline depth ~nitracline (Net primary production (NPP) = gross primary production – phytoplankton respiration) Concepts Introduced in the Martz Paper Upwelling redistributes elements essential for biological production Gas exchange alters upwelling “signature” Why the focus on nitrate? Redfield ratio f-ratio What do ratios of upwelling nutrients tell us about all of the above? The Redfield Average in seawater Ratio. Eastern Pacific in particular, has a little bit less nitrate relative to the Redfield Ratio In vast areas of the Pacific, N is a limiting nutrient REDFIELD RATIO (average in phytoplankton): (CH2O)106(NH3)16(H3PO4) + 138O2 ó106CO2+ 16HNO3 + H3PO4 + 122H2O Phytoplankton average composition Biology requires a variety of elements for growth - - C: as CO2, HCO3 , CO3 (sometimes referred to as DIC) - - + N: NO3 (NO2 ), NH4 , in rare cases N2. 2- P: HPO4 (or 3- abbreviated as PO4 ) Si: H2SiO3 (might see 100 fold excess relative to N other versions of this, e.g., Si, SiO2) 10 fold excess relative to N Fe limitation has 100 fold deficient relative to N been shown to be very relevant for the CCE Moore et al., 2013 Concepts Introduced in the Martz Paper Upwelling redistributes elements essential for biological production Gas exchange alters upwelling “signature” Redfield ratio Why the focus on nitrate? f-ratio What do ratios of upwelling nutrients tell us about all of the above? f-ratio: New nitrogen versus recycled nitrogen and new production In its simplest form new production refers to the N2 primary production facilitated by sources of N external to the euphotic zone. In our system new N is primarily supplied by upwelling. Euphotic Zone Phytoplankton NH4 + Below the Euphotic Zone - - NH4 NO2 NO3 + In contrast, total production includes phytoplankton production fuelled by ammonium (recycled) f-ratio definition New production (The amount of production fueled by new sources of nitrogen) f-ratio = (The amount of production fueled by all source of N (i.e., new and recycled)) If you were measuring NO3:CO2 ratios in seawater, how would recycled N driven production manifest in your data? Concepts Introduced in the Martz Paper Upwelling redistributes elements essential for biological production Gas exchange alters upwelling “signature” Redfield ratio Why the focus on nitrate? f-ratio What do ratios of upwelling nutrients tell us about all of the above? The anatomy of CCE2 http://mooring.ucsd.edu/projects/cce/img/cce2_08_design.png http://mooring.ucsd.edu/dev/cce2/cce2_11/ In the CCE, ratios are remarkably well conserved in a general sense. Therefore changes in concentration are due to production, respiration, and mixing. Did they measure DIC directly? - NO3 : X affected by uptake of non-nitrate N O2 equilibrates faster than CO2 - When NO3 approaches 0 continued production of O2 and consumption of CO2 must be linked to regenerated N production “The resulting time series contains variability due to daily production and respiration and mixing associated with processes such as diel changes in mixed layer depth. The effects of lower frequency processes such as upwelling and relaxation are largely removed by the high-pass filter. As described by Johnson [2010], the filtered time series contains information on the local stoichiometric relationship between carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. Uptake/remineralization ratios were calculated using a Type II regression for the filtered time series as a whole and piecewise using a shifting 5 day window to examine temporal variability.” Let’s look at the 5-day data from the automated sensors - that measure nitrate (NO3 ), oxygen (O2) and dissolved ? ? inorganic carbon (DIC) in surface waters 0 nitrate This ratio is unaffected by gas exchange Despite decrease in upwelling events there is no clear transition from new to regenerated production dominated time periods. But (blue box)…. 0 nitrate “Divergence of the sensor data from the Redfield ratio is possible through several different processes. As mentioned above, significant regional differences in particle C:P and C:N ratios have been observed and attributed to differences in phytoplankton lineage [Martiny et al., 2013]. Deviations in DIC:O2 may result from gas exchange, as O2 equilibrates with the atmosphere more rapidly than CO2. This leads to reduced amplitude in the filtered oxygen data, forcing the slope in Figure 1b to a more negative value than the Redfield ratio. Both the NO3:DIC and NO3:O2 ratios (Figures 1a and 1c) are affected by the - source of nitrogen taken up by phytoplankton. NO3 :O2 is also affected by O2 gas exchange. However, the close agreement between Redfield values and both ratios involving NO3(Table 1) suggests little (<10%) Regenerated Production at CCE-2. In other words, the f ratio [Eppley and Peterson, 1979] computed by combining the sensor data with Redfield ratios is close to 1. It is noteworthy that Johnson [2010] observed very different ratios in Monterey Bay, CA, using similar sensors and data processing. For comparison, these numbers are included in Table 1.” The anatomy of CCE2 15m sensor package CCE 2 measurements are made Temperature: Seawater temperature at 15 m depth varies because of changes in heat flux between the atmosphere and between 15-17 m below surface ocean ocean, variations in ocean currents, vertical mixing, and internal waves. Salinity: Salinity at 15 m depth varies because of changes in evaporation and precipitation, variations in ocean currents, vertical mixing, and internal waves. Density: Seawater density (sigma) depends primarily on the water's temperature and salinity.
Recommended publications
  • Probing the Changing Redfield Ratio of Phytoplankton
    Probing the Changing Redfield Ratio of phytoplankton Supervisory Team Rosalind Rickaby www.earth.ox.ac.uk/people/rosalind-rickaby Katsumi Matsumoto www.esci.umn.edu/people/katsumi-matsumoto Key Research Question What controls the Redfield Ratio amongst algae? Overview under different conditions of Fe and C availability In 1934, Alfred Redfield made the notable to test the hypothesis that it is the nutrient observation that the relative ratios of C:N:P of efficiency of photosynthesis that dictates the C:N organic matter appeared to be constant throughout ratio of organic matter. the surface oceans, and also matched the Applicants would ideally have a background in dissolved ratios of those nutrients (C106N16P1). Biology/Chemistry/Earth Sciences or The Redfield ratio is fundamental in dictating the Environmental Sciences. strength of the biological sequestration of carbon, and the amount of oxygen that is used for respiration hence is an intimate control on the biotic feedback of phytoplankton on future climate. Despite efforts to understand the co-evolution of Methodology these ratios between the phytoplankton and the Methods to be used will include: Phytoplankton seawater from experimental, field observations Culture and sterile techniques, EA IRMS, and modelling efforts, there is still no mechanistic Spectrophotometry, and Microscopy. understanding of what drives the enormous variability seen across different phytoplankton lineages with various environmental conditions (Garcia et al., 2018). References & Further Reading Nature Geoscience
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 9: Ocean Biogeochemistry
    6/3/13 Ch. 9: Ocean Biogeochemistry NOAA photo gallery Overview • The Big Picture • Ocean Circulation • Seawater Composition • Marine NPP • Particle Flux: The Biological Pump • Carbon Cycling • Nutrient Cycling • Time Pemitting: Hydrothermal venting, Sulfur cycling, Sedimentary record, El Niño • Putting It All Together Slides borrowed from Aradhna Tripati 1 6/3/13 Ocean Circulation • Upper Ocean is wind-driven and well mixed • Surface Currents deflected towards the poles by land. • Coriolis force deflects currents away from the wind, forming mid-ocean gyres • Circulation moves heat poleward • River influx is to surface ocean • Atmospheric equilibrium is with surface ocean • Primary productivity is in the surface ocean Surface Currents 2 6/3/13 Deep Ocean Circulation • Deep and Surface Oceans separated by density gradient caused by differences in Temperature and Salinity • This drives thermohaline deep circulation: * Ice forms in the N. Atlantic and Southern Ocean, leaving behind cold, saline water which sinks * Oldest water is in N. Pacific * Distribution of dissolved gases and nutrients: N, P, CO2 Seawater Composition • Salinity is defined as grams of salt/kg seawater, or parts per thousand: %o • Major ions are in approximately constant concentrations everywhere in the oceans • Salts enter in river water, and are removed by porewater burial, sea spray and evaporites (Na, Cl). • Calcium and Sulfate are removed in biogenic sediments • Magnesium is consumed in hydrothermal vents, in ionic exchange for Ca in rock. • Potassium adsorbs in clays. 3 6/3/13 Major Ions in Seawater The Two-Box Model of the Ocean Precipitation Evaporation River Flow Upwelling Downwelling Particle Flux Sedimentation 4 6/3/13 Residence time vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Microorganisms and Global Nutrient Cycles Kevin R
    03 Arrigo 15-21 6/9/05 11:17 AM Page 15 NATURE|Vol 437|15 September 2005|doi:10.1038/nature04158 INSIGHT REVIEW Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles Kevin R. Arrigo1 The way that nutrients cycle through atmospheric, terrestrial, oceanic and associated biotic reservoirs can constrain rates of biological production and help structure ecosystems on land and in the sea. On a global scale, cycling of nutrients also affects the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Because of their capacity for rapid growth, marine microorganisms are a major component of global nutrient cycles. Understanding what controls their distributions and their diverse suite of nutrient transformations is a major challenge facing contemporary biological oceanographers. What is emerging is an appreciation of the previously unknown degree of complexity within the marine microbial community. To understand how carbon and nutrients, such as nitrogen and phos- through the activities of marine phytoplankton. phorus, cycle through the atmosphere, land and oceans, we need a Unfortunately, a clear mechanism explaining the observed magni- clearer picture of the underlying processes. This is particularly impor- tude of the Redfield C:N:P ratio of 106:16:1 for either phytoplankton tant in the face of increasing anthropogenic nutrient release and or the deep ocean has been elusive. It has long been recognized that climate change. Marine microbes, which are responsible for approxi- conditions exist under which phytoplankton stoichiometry diverges mately half of the
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Lecture
    ChapterChapter 1 13 Clickers Lecture Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition Biological Productivity and Energy Transfer Alan P. Trujillo Harold V. Thurman © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Overview • Primary productivity is photosynthesis. • Productivity is globally and seasonally variable. • Feeding relationships are represented by food chains and food webs. • Oceans are being overfished. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Primary Productivity • Rate at which energy is stored in organic matter – Photosynthesis uses solar radiation. – Chemosynthesis uses chemical reactions. • 99.9% of the ocean’s biomass relies directly or indirectly on photosynthesis for food. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Photosynthesis © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Measurement of Primary Productivity • Directly – capture plankton in plankton nets • Measure radioactive carbon in seawater © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Measurement of Primary Productivity • Monitor ocean color with satellites – Photosynthetic phytoplankton use green pigment chlorophyll • SeaWiFS (Sea-viewing Wide Field of View Sensor) satellite sensor collected ocean color data 1997–2010 • MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) – current – Measures 36 spectral frequencies © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Factors Affecting Primary Productivity • Nutrient availability – Nitrate, phosphorous, iron, silica – Most from river runoff – Productivity high along continental margins – Redfield ratio – C:N:P © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Factors Affecting Primary Productivity • Solar radiation – Uppermost surface seawater and shallow seafloor – Compensation depth – net photosynthesis becomes zero – Euphotic zone —from surface to about 100 meters (330 feet) • Enough light for photosynthesis © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Light Transmission in Ocean Water • Visible light portion of the electromagnetic spectrum • Blue wavelengths penetrate deepest • Longer wavelengths (red, orange) absorbed first © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Transmission of Light in Seawater © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Marine Primary Productivity and Carbon Cycle
    Introduction to marine primary productivity and carbon cycle Satya Prakash [email protected] 400 Law Dome Ice Core, Antarctica 380 Mauna Loa, Hawaii Slope: 360 1970 - 1979: 1.3 ppm y-1 -1 340 2000 - 2006: 1.9 ppm y 320 Concentration (ppm) 2 CO 300 280 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year CO2 – Temperature Relationship CO2 Concentration Temperature 380 4 2 340 0 300 -2 (ppmv) 2 260 -4 Degree C Degree CO -6 220 -8 180 -10 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Age (Kyr) VOSTOK Ice Core data How much is 100 ppm?? 1 ppm = 2.12 * 1015 gm = 2.12*109 tonnes 100 ppm = 2.12 thousand crore tonnes 1m. 1m. = 1000 kg = 2.44 टन 1m. CO2 1m. Water or one tonne 1m. 1m. Partition of Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions into Sinks [2000-2006] 45% of all CO2 emissions accumulated in the atmosphere 55% were removed by natural sinks Ocean removes ~ 24% Land removes ~ 30% Upper Photic Layer Photosynthesis O2 O2 CO2 CO2 Respiration Deeper Aphotic Layer The Ocean Euphotic zone light - ~little N Aphotic zone no light - lots N Photosynthesis is a process that generates the organic matter in phytoplankton cells. The process of photosynthesis can be represented as: hv 106CO2 + 122H2O + 16HNO3 + H3PO4 (CH2O)106(NH3)16H3PO4 + 138O2 Available solar energy in the waveband 400-700 nm. This reaction illustrates the need for the nutrients: nitrate and phosphate. It also shows that for every 106 CO2 molecules taken up, approximately 138 O2 molecules are produced.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Methods and Metrics in Research, Implementation, and Management of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-14-2020 A Review of the Methods and Metrics in Research, Implementation, and Management of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture Cassandra Erickson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Sustainability Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Erickson, Cassandra, "A Review of the Methods and Metrics in Research, Implementation, and Management of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture" (2020). Master's Projects and Capstones. 1028. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/1028 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master’s Project A Review of Methods and Metrics in Research, Implementation, and Management of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture By: Cassandra Erickson is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements of Marine Life Noah J
    commentary most direct effect of human activity on the whether they do so through phenotypic Nicolas Gruber is in the Environmental oceanic N cycle is the massive application or genotypic changes. Clear latitudinal Physics group, Institute of Biogeochemistry and of fertilizers full of bioavailable N, much trends in the N:P ratio of phytoplankton Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, of which makes its way to the ocean communities have been found14,15. It Switzerland. Curtis A. Deutsch is at the School of either via rivers or through long-range remains to be seen whether the shifting Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, atmospheric transport13. boundaries of major ocean biomes can Washington 98195, USA. Currently, we can only speculate alter the large-scale patterns of plankton e-mail: [email protected] about how these perturbations, and their N:P ratios, and how that would modify the interactions, will alter the marine nitrogen stabilizing feedbacks. References cycle and affect its homeostasis. Given Redfield’s pioneering view of the 1. Redfield, A. C. in James Johnston Memorial Volume that most stabilizing feedbacks operate ocean as a system capable of homeostatic (ed. Daniel, R. J.) 176–192 (Univ. Press of Liverpool, 1934). 2. Redfield, A. C. Am. Sci. 46, 205–221 (1958). on timescales of decades and longer, it is regulation helped pave the way for the 3. Deutsch, C., Sigman, D. M., Thunell, R. C., Meckler, A. N. & likely that we will see widespread temporal broader and now commonplace recognition Haug, G. H. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB4012 (2004). imbalances in the marine nitrogen cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • CO2 Availability Affects Elemental Composition (C:N:P) of the Marine Diatom Skeletonema Costa Tum
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published August28 Mar EcoI Prog Ser I CO2 availability affects elemental composition (C:N:P) of the marine diatom Skeletonema costa tum Steffen Burkhardt*, Ulf Riebesell Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany ABSTRACT. The effect of variable CO, concenti-ations on the elemental composition (C N:P) of marine diatoms was investigated in 2 strains of Skeletonema costatum (Grev.)Cleve Five or 6 concentrations of dissolved molecular carbon dioxlde [CO, (aq)],ranging from 0.5 to 39 pm01 I-', were applied in dilute batch cultures. In both strains, elemental ratios were clearly dependent on [CO.(aq)]. With decreasing CO2 concentrations, a decline in C.P and N P and an increase in C:N was observed. The close correla- tion between C:P or N:P and [CO, (aq)]corresponded to a ca 45 to 65?<,decrease in elemental ratios from highest (230 pm01 I-') to lowest (ca 1 pm01 I-') COz concentrations. C:N at low [COz (aq)]was up to 24 % higher than at high [CO, (aq)].To date, the elemental composition of marine phytoplankton has been considered to be independent of CO, availability. If dependency of the C:N:P ratio on [CO2(aq)] proves to be a general phenomenon in marine phytoplankton, changes in the elemental composition may be expected in response to the currently observed increase in partial pressure of atmospher~cCOz. KEY WORDS: Redfield ratio - CO, - Phytoplankton Manne diatoms Cell stoichiometry INTRODUCTION become a limiting factor in the growth of marine plants in the sea' due to the high concentrations of inorganic In the 1930s, Alfred C.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Effects of Eutrophication in the Black Sea
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF EUTROPHICATION IN THE BLACK SEA SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by Joint Ad-hoc Technical Working Group ICPDR - ICPBS DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF EUTROPHICATION IN THE BLACK SEA SUMMARY REPORT JUNE 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by Joint Ad-hoc Technical Working Group ICPDR - ICPBS Preface The Black Sea is regarded as a regional sea that has been most severely damaged as the result of human activity. Based upon comprehensive studies by scientists, in 1996, Ministers of the Environment from Black Sea countries recognised, amongst other things, that "The Black Sea ecosystems continues to be threatened by inputs of certain pollutants, notably nutrients. Nutrients enter the Black Sea from land based sources, and in particular through rivers The Danube River accounts for well over half of the nutrient input of the Black Sea. Eutrophication is a phenomenon which occurs over wide areas of the Black Sea and should be a concern to the countries of the Black Sea Basin." Further more, the Ministers agreed that "A Black Sea Basin Wide Strategy, negotiated wit all states located in the Black Sea Basin should be developed to address the eutrophication problem in the Black Sea. The objective of the Strategy should be to negotiate a progressive series of stepwise reductions of nutrient loads, until agreed Black Sea water quality objectives are met." In order to facilitate the development of such a strategy, it is necessary to have a clear common understanding of the nature of the problem, its causes and the options available for solving it.
    [Show full text]
  • Microalgae Cultivation Technologies As an Opportunity for Bioenergetic System Development—Advantages and Limitations
    sustainability Review Microalgae Cultivation Technologies as an Opportunity for Bioenergetic System Development—Advantages and Limitations Marcin D˛ebowski 1,* , Marcin Zieli ´nski 1 , Joanna Kazimierowicz 2 , Natalia Kujawska 3 and Szymon Talbierz 3 1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Białystok, Poland; [email protected] 3 InnovaTree Sp. z o.o., 81-451 Gdynia, Poland; [email protected] (N.K.); [email protected] (S.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 September 2020; Accepted: 27 November 2020; Published: 29 November 2020 Abstract: Microalgal biomass is currently considered as a sustainable and renewable feedstock for biofuel production (biohydrogen, biomethane, biodiesel) characterized by lower emissions of hazardous air pollutants than fossil fuels. Photobioreactors for microalgae growth can be exploited using many industrial and domestic wastes. It allows locating the commercial microalgal systems in areas that cannot be employed for agricultural purposes, i.e., near heating or wastewater treatment plants and other industrial facilities producing carbon dioxide and organic and nutrient compounds. Despite their high potential, the large-scale algal biomass production technologies are not popular because the systems for biomass production, separation, drainage, and conversion into energy carriers are difficult to explicitly assess and balance, considering the ecological and economical concerns. Most of the studies presented in the literature have been carried out on a small, laboratory scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 3. Oceanic Carbon and Nutrient Cycling
    OCN 401 Biogeochemical Systems (11.03.15) (Schlesinger: Chapter 9) Part 3. Oceanic Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Lecture Outline 1. The Oceanic Carbon System 2. Nutrient Cycling in the Ocean 3. Other elements a) Si b) Fe c) Passive uptake d) Trace elements 4. Summary Oceanic CO2 system - Significance • CO2 is the raw material used to build biomass (reduced to form organic matter) • CO2 controls the fraction of inbound radiation that remains trapped in the atmosphere (greenhouse effect), which controls planetary climate • CO2 controls the acidity (pH) of the oceans • Distribution of CO2 species affects the preservation of CaCO3 deposited on the sea floor CO2 speciation Speciation equations The equilibrium of gaseous and aqueous carbon dioxide: CO2(g) ↔ CO2(aq) Subsequent hydration and dissociation reactions: - + CO2(aq) + H2O ↔ HCO3 + H - 2- + HCO3 ↔ CO3 + H CO2 speciation + - + 2- CO2(g) ↔ CO2(aq) + H2O ↔ H2CO3(aq) ↔ H + HCO3 (aq) ↔ H + CO3 (aq) WGBU (2006) from concepts in Raven et al. (2005) Atmospheric-Ocean CO2 Exchange • CO2 dissolves in seawater as a function of [CO2] in the overlying atmosphere (PCO2), according to Henry’s Law: [CO2]aq = k*PCO2 (2.7) where k = the solubility constant • CO dissolution rate increases with: 2 - increasing wind speed and turbulence - decreasing temperature - increasing pressure • CO enters the deep ocean with downward flux of cold water at polar latitudes 2 - water upwelling today formed 300-500 years ago, when atmospheric [CO2] was 280 ppm, versus 360 ppm today • Although in theory ocean surface waters
    [Show full text]
  • Prueba De Comunicación Oral
    1 CO2 ADDITION TO INCREASE BIOMASS PRODUCTION AND CONTROL 2 MICROALGAE SPECIES IN HIGH RATE ALGAL PONDS TREATING 3 WASTEWATER 4 5 6 7 Enrica Uggetti1,2*, Bruno Sialve2, Jérôme Hamelin2, Anaïs Bonnafous2, Jean-Philippe 8 Steyer2 9 10 11 1GEMMA – Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology, Department of Civil and 12 Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya•BarcelonaTech, c/ Jordi Girona 13 1-3, Building D1, E-08034, Barcelona, Spain. 14 15 2LBE, Univ Montpellier, INRA, Narbonne, France. 16 17 18 *Corresponding author: Enrica Uggetti 19 Tel: +34 93 401 64 65 20 Fax: +34 93 401 73 57 21 E-mail address: [email protected] 1 22 Abstract 23 Challenges regarding microalgal cultivation need to be solved in order to enhance 24 microalgae potential as a feedstock for biofuel, bioenergy, and bioproducts. The 25 optimization of the operating strategy in high rate algal ponds treating wastewater still 26 requires research on microalgal ecosystem response to variations in nutrients availability. 27 For this reason, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of CO2 addition on 28 microalgal population diversity and wastewater treatment performance. To this end, batch 29 and continuous experiments were carried out in an experimental plant constituted by four 30 high rate algal ponds (500 L each) treating urban wastewater with and without pH 31 regulation. As expected, CO2 addition induced a significant increase in biomass 32 concentration (between 66 and 100%). Moreover, a positive effect on microalgal biomass 33 concentration was observed, reducing the effect of the variation in influent wastewater 34 characteristics.
    [Show full text]