DOCSLIB.ORG

Morris County Master Plan: Circulation Element

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morris County Master Plan: Circulation Element Morris County Master Plan Circulation Element ____________________________________________________________________ Morris County Master Plan Circulation Element Prepared By: Morris County Department of Public Works Division of Engineering and Transportation In Conjunction with: Morris County Planning Board ADOPTED: October 18, 2018 I hereby certify that this document is a true copy of the Circulation Element adopted by the Morris County Planning Board at its regular meeting on October 18, 2018. Christine G. Marion, PP, AICP Planning Director ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders Douglas R. Cabana, Director Christine Myers, Deputy Director John Cesaro Heather Darling Kathryn A. DeFillippo Thomas J. Mastrangelo Deborah Smith County Administration John Bonanni, County Administrator Deena Leary, Assistant County Administrator Morris County Planning Board Morris County Board of Transportation Steve Rattner, Chairman Joe Wells, Chairman Isobel W. Olcott, Vice Chair Frank T. Reilly, Vice Chairman Ted Eppel, Secretary Kathryn A. DeFillippo, Freeholder Annabel Pierce John Cesaro, Freeholder Everton Scott Melverne E. Cooke Stephen D. Jones Stephen Antonelli Nita Galate Ilene Dorf Manahan Christian Francioli, Alternate#1 Manuela Schuster Christopher J. Vitz, County Engineer John Wetzel Roslyn Khurdan, County Engineer Alt. Leonard Resto, Alternate #1 Christine Myers, Freeholder Liaison Jigar Shah, Alternate #2 Deborah Smith, Freeholder Alternate W. Randall Bush, Esq. County Counsel Morris County Department of Public Works, Morris County Office of Division of Engineering and Planning and Preservation Transportation (Staff members involved in the (Staff members involved in the development of this Element) development of this Element) Christine Marion, Planning Director Christopher J. Vitz, Director of Public Works / County Engineer Gene Cass, Supervising Cartographer Gerald Rohsler, Transportation Director Greg Perry, Supervising Planner Debra A. Dellagiacoma, Principal Traffic Engineer Barbara Murray, Principal Planner John J. Hayes, Principal Planner Anthony Soriano, Supervising Planner Joseph A. Russo, Senior Planner Project funding assistance provided by the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority Table of Contents Chapter 1: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies A. The Need for a Plan ...............................................................................................................................1-1 B. Plan Development Process ....................................................................................................................1-1 C. Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................................................1-3 D. Strategies ...............................................................................................................................................1-4 E. Morris County Street Design Guidelines ..............................................................................................1-20 Chapter 2: Planning Context and Background A. Partners in Transportation ..................................................................................................................2-1 B. Transportation Planning Activities Since 1992 ....................................................................................2-3 C. Important Transportation and Land Use Changes Since 1992 ............................................................2-8 D. Plans and Programs Affecting Transportation ....................................................................................2-13 Chapter 3: Demographics A. Population .............................................................................................................................................3-1 B. Housing .................................................................................................................................................3-9 C. Income and Employment ......................................................................................................................3-13 Chapter 4: The Transportation Network A. Roads and Bridges ................................................................................................................................4-1 B. Public Transportation ..........................................................................................................................4-10 C. Bicycle and Pedestrian Network ...........................................................................................................4-16 D. Freight Transportation ........................................................................................................................4-18 E. Aviation .................................................................................................................................................4-24 F. Commuting Patterns .............................................................................................................................4-25 Chapter 5: Infrastructure, Development, and Technology Trends A. Infrastructure Trends ...........................................................................................................................5-1 B. Development Trends .............................................................................................................................5-3 C. Technology Trends ................................................................................................................................5-7 Glossary that accommodates all users, advances overall CHAPTER 1: mobility, and supports the efficient movement of people and goods that is necessary to maintain, Goals, Objectives, and improve, and enhance local and regional economic growth and quality of life. It presents information Strategies that may be used by local governments to inform their transportation planning and decision-making and will be used to help coordinate local, county, and state transportation policy and actions in Morris County. This new Circulation Element will serve as a guiding document for transportation planning and investment in Morris County for the next 25 years. Over this period, substantial changes to the trans- portation environment are anticipated. Examples include increased traffic associated with continued growth, increasing demand on public transit/ specialized transportation, and the challenges and opportunities associated with new technologies, such as autonomous vehicles, drones, and alterna- tive fueling infrastructure. Plan Structure The Circulation Element is divided into five chap- ters. Chapter One describes the process used to create this document and presents the essential pol- icy and action elements of the Circulation Element, i.e., the goals, objectives, strategies, and guidelines that will help direct the County’s transportation polices and decisions. Chapters two through five document the context in which this Circulation Ele- A. The Need for a Plan ment was developed, demographic conditions, the existing transportation network, and future trends. he Morris County Master Plan is composed of various elements that address issues affecting county residents, businesses, municipalities, B. Plan Development Process and the region. The last Circulation Element Tof the Morris County Master Plan was adopted in The Circulation Element was developed through 1992. Since then, Morris County has gained approxi- a comprehensive planning process. This process mately 80,000 residents reaching a total population included input from the public and a variety of of about 500,000 persons. Over the last quarter cen- stakeholders, identification of current County tury, major transportation, land use, demographic, transportation system conditions, analysis of demo- and regulatory changes have occurred, accompanied graphic trends and economic issues, and review of by shifting traffic patterns, increased traffic volumes, municipal transportation plans and initiatives. The congestion, and demand for transportation services. information gathered was used to help develop the Morris County and other agencies have continued goals, objectives, and strategies contained herein. to analyze and advance solutions to address these evolving challenges. The purpose of this new Circu- lation Element is to provide a comprehensive review Public Outreach of current conditions and transportation trends, and Input from local residents and the business com- to present strategies to respond to the transporta- munity played an important role in developing the tion issues and concerns identified during this plan’s Circulation Element. A robust public outreach effort development. was conducted to provide a variety of opportunities This Circulation Element promotes the County’s for public participation. This public outreach effort vision of a well-maintained transportation system included the following: 1-1 from representative members of relevant public agencies, advocacy groups, and transportation plan- ning partners of Morris County and the region. The TAC consisted of representatives from the following entities: zzzMorris County Department of Human Services zzzMorris County Park Commission zzzMorris County Office of Emergency Management zzzMorris County Tourism Bureau zzzMorris County Chamber of Commerce zzzMorris County Economic Development Corpora- tion (MCEDC) zzzPublic Workshops in Denville, Lincoln Park, Morris Township, and Roxbury zzzMorris
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Housing Diversity and Affordability in New
    HOUSING DIVERSITY AND AFFORDABILITY IN NEW JERSEY’S TRANSIT VILLAGES By Dorothy Morallos Mabel Smith Honors Thesis Douglass College Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey April 11, 2006 Written under the direction of Professor Jan S. Wells Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy ABSTRACT New Jersey’s Transit Village Initiative is a major policy initiative, administered by the New Jersey Department of Transportation that promotes the concept of transit oriented development (TOD) by revitalizing communities and promoting residential and commercial growth around transit centers. Several studies have been done on TODs, but little research has been conducted on the effects it has on housing diversity and affordability within transit areas. This research will therefore evaluate the affordable housing situation in relation to TODs in within a statewide context through the New Jersey Transit Village Initiative. Data on the affordable housing stock of 16 New Jersey Transit Villages were gathered for this research. Using Geographic Information Systems Software (GIS), the locations of these affordable housing sites were mapped and plotted over existing pedestrian shed maps of each Transit Village. Evaluations of each designated Transit Village’s efforts to encourage or incorporate inclusionary housing were based on the location and availability of affordable developments, as well as the demographic character of each participating municipality. Overall, findings showed that affordable housing remains low amongst all the designated villages. However, new rules set forth by the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) may soon change these results and the overall affordable housing stock within the whole state.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Trips, Excursions, Special Journeys, Outings, Tours, and Milestones In, To, from Or Through New Jersey
    TRANSPORTATION TRIPS, EXCURSIONS, SPECIAL JOURNEYS, OUTINGS, TOURS, AND MILESTONES IN, TO, FROM OR THROUGH NEW JERSEY Bill McKelvey, Editor, Updated to Mon., Mar. 8, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is a reference work which we hope will be useful to historians and researchers. For those researchers wanting to do a deeper dive into the history of a particular event or series of events, copious resources are given for most of the fantrips, excursions, special moves, etc. in this compilation. You may find it much easier to search for the RR, event, city, etc. you are interested in than to read the entire document. We also think it will provide interesting, educational, and sometimes entertaining reading. Perhaps it will give ideas to future fantrip or excursion leaders for trips which may still be possible. In any such work like this there is always the question of what to include or exclude or where to draw the line. Our first thought was to limit this work to railfan excursions, but that soon got broadened to include rail specials for the general public and officials, special moves, trolley trips, bus outings, waterway and canal journeys, etc. The focus has been on such trips which operated within NJ; from NJ; into NJ from other states; or, passed through NJ. We have excluded regularly scheduled tourist type rides, automobile journeys, air trips, amusement park rides, etc. NOTE: Since many of the following items were taken from promotional literature we can not guarantee that each and every trip was actually operated. Early on the railways explored and promoted special journeys for the public as a way to improve their bottom line.
    [Show full text]
  • CED-78-82 Information on Questions Asked About Conrail's Service In
    DOCURlIT RESURE 05624 - B0965894] Information on Questions Asked about Conrails Service in the Scranton, Pennsylvania, Area. CD-78-82; B-164497 (5). April 4, 1978. 2 pp. appendix (13 pp.). Report to Sen. H. John eins, II; by Henry Bschwege, Director, Community and Bconomic Developent Div. Issue Area: Transportatioa Svsems and Policies: Railroad Freight Transportation system (2407). Contact: Community and Economic Development Div. Budget Function: Coaaertc and Transportations Ground T;.ansportation (404). Organization Concerned: Consolidated ail Corp.; Interstate Commaserce Commission. Congressional Relevance: House Comaittee o Interstate and Foreign Comerce; Senate Committee on Commerce. Sen. John Heinz, III. Authority: Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 P.L. 94-210). Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (45 .S.C. 701). The Railroad evitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 required that each railroad designated by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) as a class I railroad prepare and submit a full and coaplete analysis of its rail system to the secretary of Transportation. review was conducted of the Consolidated ail Corporaticai's (Conraills) procedures in gathering information for deteamining the classification and designation of rail lines, the circumstances surrounding the closing of Conrail's pivgyback terminal in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and Conrail's plans for the rail line serving Scrantcn. Findings/conclusions: Conrail's estimated annual volume of about 4.5 nillion g s tons for the Scranton line was determined by train ovemeats during the week of December 12, 1976. Conrail's data accurately portrayed the then-current level of traffic, and the line was correctly designatei as a category A branchline.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Natural Nuclear Bunkers
    America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers 1 America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 10 Alabama .............................................................................................................. 12 Alabama Caves .................................................................................................. 13 Alabama Mines ................................................................................................. 16 Alabama Tunnels .............................................................................................. 16 Alaska ................................................................................................................. 18 Alaska Caves ..................................................................................................... 19 Alaska Mines ............................................................................................... 19 Arizona ............................................................................................................... 24 Arizona Caves ................................................................................................... 25 Arizona Mines ................................................................................................... 26 Arkansas ............................................................................................................ 28 Arkansas Caves ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA-NJ-2014-014 Measuring Benefits of Transit Oriented
    FHWA-NJ-2014-014 Measuring Benefits of Transit Oriented Development FINAL REPORT June 2013 Submitted by: Robert B. Noland, Ph.D. Kaan Ozbay, Ph.D. Stephanie DiPetrillo Shri Iyer Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Rutgers University NJDOT Research Project Manager Edward Stephen Kondrath In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration or the Federal Transit Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NJ-2014-014 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Measuring Benefits of Transit Oriented Development June 2013 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Noland, Robert B., Ph.D., Kaan Ozbay, Ph.D., Stephanie DiPetrillo MNTRC Report 12-18 and Shri Iyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered New Jersey Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration PO 600 US Department of Transportation Trenton, NJ 08625 Washington, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Mineta National Transit Research Consortium, Mineta Transportation Institute, College of Business, San José State University San José, CA 95192-0219 Report is available, with separate covers, from each sponsor.
    [Show full text]
  • Livability in Northern New Jersey
    A P T J Fall 2010 N m o b i l i t y Livability in Northern New Jersey Livability: A Legacy of Northern N.J. Communities hat’s old is new again. With deep historical separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Over roots, many New Jersey towns have 600 modest houses are arranged around the edge of features dating back a century or more— “super blocks” with large interior parks. Located including closely spaced row homes, grid near Fair Lawn Train Station, the 149-acre street layouts, ornate brick and stone neighborhood includes a shopping center, a community Wcommercial buildings and downtown train stations— center, a library and a network of parks and trails. that are being rediscovered as the foundation for Even newer suburban towns in New Jersey are more “livable” and sustainable lifestyles. Ironically, able to draw on the examples of their older neighbors many of the “antiquated” features are being looked and make use of shared infrastructure—notably, the to as wave of the future in community design. state’s extensive mass transit system—to give residents new lifestyle options. P O K T In the midst of economic T I W L L recession, the ethos of getting back I B to basics and reclaiming what is valuable from the past is gaining ground. It is being combined with an appreciation for the power of new technologies and a greater understanding of the environmental impacts of various development patterns and their relation to the transportation system. This issue of Mobility Matters highlights examples of livability and sustainability in communities throughout northern New Jersey that point to new and hopeful directions for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    LITERATURE CITED Allen, A.W. 1987. Habitat suitability index models: barred owl. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biol. Rep. 82 (10.143). 17pp. Accessed February 2012 at: http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/wdb/pub/hsi/hsi-143.pdf. Amphibian Ark (AARK). 2011. Information of the chytrid fungus. Accessed September 2011 at: http://www.amphibianark.org/the-chrisis/chytrid- fungus/. Anderson, J.D. 1967. Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge amphibian and reptile list (plus progress reports 1969, 1970, 1973, 1975, 1976). Appalachian Mountains Joint Venture (AMJV) Management Board. 2008. Implementation Plan for the Appalachian Mountains Joint Venture: A Foundation for All-bird Conservation in the Region. Brian W. Smith (ed.). Appalachian Mountains Joint Venture, Frankfort, KY. Accessed December 2010 at: http://www.amjv.org/library/amjv.pdf. Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ASTDR) 2011. Toxic Substances Portal – acrolein and formaldehyde. Center for Disease Control (CDC). Last updated March 3, 2011. Accessed August 2011 at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov. Arbuthnot, M. 2008. A Landowner’s Guide to New England Cottontail Habitat Management. Environmental Defense Fund. p.20. Accessed March 2012 at: http://apps.edf.org/documents/8828_New-England-Cottontail- Guide.pdf. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture (ACJV). June 2005. North American Waterfowl Management Plan, Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Waterfowl Implementation Plan Revision. ---. 2009. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Strategic Plan. Updated July 2009. Accessed December 2010 at: http://www.acjv.org/documents/ACJV_StrategicPlan_2009update_final.pdf. Audubon Society. 2007. The 2007 Audubon Watchlist. Accessed December 2010 at: http://birds.audubon.org/2007- audubon-watchlist. Balzano, S., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Postcards Inventory
    Morristown and Morris Township Public Library, North Jersey History and Genealogy Center: Inventory of Postcards ATLANTIC Atlantic Atlantic City Sent 1980 Beach Beach In the Surf, Atlantic City, N.J. Atlantic Atlantic City Post 1907 Beach Beach Lifting the Lid at Atlantic City (Reproduction) Atlantic Atlantic City Sent 1951 Beach / Skyline Beach [Front:] Beachfront at night from Shelburne at Left to Haddon Hall in Distance, Atlantic City, N.J. - 95 [Back:] Visualize a myriad of lights twinkling like some great constellation of stars and you have a picture of Atlantic City=s beach front at night. Brilliantly lighted electrical displays, alive with action, draw the admiration of countless thousands of visitors each year. Atlantic Atlantic City Post 1930 Beach / Skyline Atlantic City Skyline [Front:] This is Atlantic City [Back:] Skyline of Atlantic city, N.J. This world famous skyline is symbolic of the World=s Greatest All-Year Health and Pleasure Resort. Atlantic Atlantic City n.d. Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk on Easter Sunday Morning, Steel Pier & Beach, Atlantic City, N.J. [Handcolored] Atlantic Atlantic City Post 1907 Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk Atlantic City, N.J. View of Beach and Boardwalk with Amusement Pier and Sky Tower in the background. [Reproduction] Atlantic Atlantic City Post 1930 Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk Atlantic City-scene On The Island You Can Drive To. A Bicentennial Salute [Reproduction] Atlantic Atlantic City Pre 1906 Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk Atlantic City Young=s Pier Atlantic Atlantic City Post 1907 Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk Boardwalk and Million Dollar Pier, Atlantic City (Reproduction) Atlantic Atlantic City Pre 1906 Boardwalk Atlantic City Boardwalk Easter Sunday on the Boardwalk - Atlantic City, N.J.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ TRANSIT…Value Capture Through Joint Development – the Highlands at Morristown
    NJ TRANSIT & Value Capture: Experience, Analysis & Strategies for the Future Vivian E. Baker, Assistant Director Transit Friendly Land Use & Development NJ TRANSIT RailVolution - October 17, 2011 HR&A Advisors, Inc. NJ TRANSIT USE OF VALUE CAPTURE 0 NJ’s Rail and Bus Network Third largest commuter transit system in the country • Commuter Rail, Light Rail, Express Bus, Intra- state Bus, Private Bus Carriers, Bus Rapid Transit “Lite” & Community Transit (by private carriers and/or counties) • Connecting NJ to Center City Philadelphia, Atlantic City, Newark, Jersey City and Lower and Midtown Manhattan HR&A Advisors, Inc. NJ TRANSIT USE OF VALUE CAPTURE 1 NJ’s Light Rail Network Newark Light Rail River LINE Hudson Bergen Light Rail 3 different lines (Newark, River LINE, Hudson-Bergen) 60 stations in 21 NJ communities HR&A Advisors, Inc. NJ TRANSIT USE OF VALUE CAPTURE 2 NJ’s Land Use and Transit Policies • NJ TRANSIT created in 1979 to reverse decline of public transportation • State Development & Redevelopment Plan adopted (1986)…encourages growth in areas where population, jobs and infrastructure exist • NJ TRANSIT’s Transit-Friendly Planning Assistance Program (1999)…community engagement, visioning and TOD plan adoption • NJ’s Statewide “Transit Village Initiative” (1999)…rewarding communities who “get” TOD • NJ’s Green House Gas Plan (2008)… reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and cut emissions to 80% under the 2006 level by 2050 • Urban Transit Hub Tax Credit Act (2009)…incentivizing commercial and residential development in NJ (tax breaks and job creation) • Economic Redevelopment & Growth Grants (2009)…incentivizing redevelopment (up to 75% of state or local tax) in State Plan targeted growth areas HR&A Advisors, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Northwest New Jersey Bus Study
    Final Report Northwest New Jersey Bus Study December 2010 This report has been prepared under the direction of the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority and NJ TRANSIT, New Jersey’s public transportation agency, with financing by the Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The NJTPA is solely responsible for its contents. Northwest New Jersey Bus Study - Assumptions Impacting Baseline Conditions February 2011 The Northwest New Jersey (NWNJ) Bus Study was substantively completed in the spring of 2010. Prior to the completion of the final report in December 2010, there were several changes in the assumptions that went into the report that change some of the baseline conditions described in Chapter 2, but do not have a significant impact on the study’s findings. The first was the reduction and elimination of certain transit services in the study area in the spring of 2010 due to severe fiscal challenges facing the state and local agencies. The second was the discontinuation of the Access to the Region’s Core Project in the fall of 2010. Each of these changes and their impact on the study’ findings are explained below. In the spring of 2010, NJ TRANSIT proposed a system-wide set of fare increases and service reductions to address a severe budget deficit faced by the agency. As part of these cuts a number of local routes operating largely within Morris County were proposed for elimination based on low ridership, low farebox recovery and the withdrawal of local financial support for some routes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Highway Carrying Bridges
    NEW JERSEY HIGHWAY CARRYING BRIDGES Attachment # 1 – Bridge Condition Inventory (All Bridges) and Definitions Information Provided: Owner Maintenance Responsibility Route Number Structure Number Name Date of Last Inspection Open/Closed Status Bridge Classification (Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete) Sufficiency Rating (0 to 100) New Jersey Department of Transportation September 30, 2007 Bridge Condition Inventory Of All Highway Carrying NJ Bridges Structure Last Open/Closed Deficient Or Sufficiency Owner Maintenance Route Name Number Inspection Status Obsolete Rating State State 1 1103151 US RT 1 / SHIPETAUKIN CR 7/31/2006 Open Deficient 69.4 State State 1 1103158 ALEXANDER RD OVER US 1 4/11/2007 Open Not Deficient 98.8 State State 1 1103157 QUAKER BRIDGE RD (CO.533)/US RT 1 12/2/2005 Open Not Deficient 95.2 State State 1 1103153 US 1 OVER DUCK POND RUN 9/27/2006 Open Not Deficient 70.0 State State 1 1101164 US 1 RAMP C OVER MARKET STREET(NJ 33) 6/13/2007 Open Not Deficient 95.5 State State 1 1101162 US 1B/D&R CANAL AND US 1 SB 10/13/2006 Open Not Deficient 80.9 State State 1 1101159 US 1 SB OVER NB RAMP TO OLDEN AVE. (CR 622) 10/11/2006 Open Not Deficient 94.9 State State 1 1101150 ROUTE US 1 OVER ASSUNPINK CREEK 8/1/2007 Open Not Deficient 82.4 State State 1 1101156 PERRY STREET OVER US 1 8/2/2007 Open Obsolete 93.5 State State 1 1201151 US ROUTE 1 OVER FORRESTAL ROAD. 4/28/2006 Open Obsolete 75.7 State State 1 1103159 MEADOW ROAD OVER US ROUTE 1 10/7/2005 Open Not Deficient 91.1 State State 1 1101155 STATE STREET (CO.635) OVER US 1 8/2/2007 Open Deficient 65.2 State State 1 1101163 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Sussex Lackawanna Cut-Off Minimal Operable Segment
    DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PLANNING Division of Planning Sussex County Administrative Center One Spring Street Newton, N.J. 07860 Tel. 973-579-0500 FAX 973- 579-0513 County of Sussex Lackawanna Cut-Off Minimal Operable Segment (MOS) Passenger Rail Project Updated: July 15, 2016 Project: Restoration of Commuter Rail Service on the Lackawanna Cut-Off Rail Line from Port Morris, NJ to Andover, NJ Counties: Sussex and Morris Municipalities: Stanhope Borough; Hopatcong Borough; Byram Township; Andover Township; Andover Borough and Green Township Project Sponsor: NJ TRANSIT - Project TIP ID/DBNUM: T535 - Miles: 7.3 Project Description: The Minimal Operable Segment (MOS) of the Lackawanna Cut-Off involves the restoration of commuter rail service from Port Morris, NJ to Andover, NJ. The MOS is considered a 1st Phase of the Project. Project Milestones: • The State of New Jersey completed the purchase of the Lackawanna Cut-Off Rail ROW in May 2001 • The FTA required NJ Transit to do a Supplemental E/A for environmental issues. The FTA issued a revised FONSI for the 133-mile corridor from Hoboken, NJ to Scranton, PA on October 2, 2009. • NJ Transit’s Board of Directors authorized work for Conceptual Design of the MOS in 2009. Project Tasks and Schedule: February 2011 – NJT begins ROW Restoration and tree removal from Port Morris to CR 605 - Complete November 2012 – NJT begins Track Bed Restoration, new Ballast and Re-lay new rail to CR 605 - Complete June 2013 - NJT to acquire necessary permits from NJDEP to complete construction to Andover Station. September and December 2013 NJT met with NJDEP to review status of required permits.
    [Show full text]