DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report Northwest New Jersey Bus Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Northwest New Jersey Bus Study Final Report Northwest New Jersey Bus Study December 2010 This report has been prepared under the direction of the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority and NJ TRANSIT, New Jersey’s public transportation agency, with financing by the Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The NJTPA is solely responsible for its contents. Northwest New Jersey Bus Study - Assumptions Impacting Baseline Conditions February 2011 The Northwest New Jersey (NWNJ) Bus Study was substantively completed in the spring of 2010. Prior to the completion of the final report in December 2010, there were several changes in the assumptions that went into the report that change some of the baseline conditions described in Chapter 2, but do not have a significant impact on the study’s findings. The first was the reduction and elimination of certain transit services in the study area in the spring of 2010 due to severe fiscal challenges facing the state and local agencies. The second was the discontinuation of the Access to the Region’s Core Project in the fall of 2010. Each of these changes and their impact on the study’ findings are explained below. In the spring of 2010, NJ TRANSIT proposed a system-wide set of fare increases and service reductions to address a severe budget deficit faced by the agency. As part of these cuts a number of local routes operating largely within Morris County were proposed for elimination based on low ridership, low farebox recovery and the withdrawal of local financial support for some routes. Routes originally proposed for elimination included the MCM1, MCM2, MCM3, MCM 4, MCM5, MCM7, 966, 967, and 973 bus lines. After extensive outreach, feedback and public hearings NJ TRANSIT discontinued the following routes: MCM4, MCM5, and MCM7 as of May 1, 2010 and the 967 and 973 were discontinued as of July1, 2010. The NWNJ Bus Study had noted all of these routes as weaker performing routes and identified them for either elimination or significant route restructuring. The remaining Morris County local routes underwent significant restructuring to address regional needs. NJ TRANSIT staff started with reviewing the service recommendations from the NWNJ Bus Study. Not all Morris County-oriented recommendations from the NWNJ study were implemented due to budget constraints and feedback from local stakeholders in Morris County. In early October 2010, a final package of service changes were approved and a new set of local Morris bus routes 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 878, 879 and 880 were implemented. In the balance of the study area including Sussex, western Passaic and northern Warren Counties, the discontinuation of the 976 and 973 minibus routes impacted some of the findings for shuttle restructuring and the elimination of some Montclair-Boonton Line trains west of Montclair may impact the scale of future transit hubs. The findings from the NWNJ Bus Study directly influenced the service restructuring and assisted NJ TRANSIT in maximizing resources and meeting service needs. On October 27, 2010 New Jersey officially cancelled the Access to Region’s Core (ARC) Project. The ARC project called for the construction of a new rail tunnel to New York City, which would have increased the number of trains into New York City from all over New Jersey, including some from the NWNJ study area. While ARC was considered in the assumptions for the NWNJ Bus Study, its discontinuation has little impact on the study’s findings. While workers from the study area do travel to New York City, less than 5 percent of all work trips originating from the study area are destined to Manhattan. Commuter trips beginning and ending entirely within the study area make up the largest overall market among workers, with a share of 75 percent. The cancellation of the ARC project generally does not impact the primary study findings which concentrate on improvements to local public transit services, upgrading and expanding bus facilities, and leveraging the existing interstate bus service to better serve the study area. The findings of this study remain valid and create a blueprint for future bus improvements. Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Study Purpose and Background .................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Study Organization .....................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Study Area and Key Corridors ....................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Overview of Study Outreach Process.........................................................................................1-4 1.5 Context: Relevant Past and Concurrent Studies and Efforts ......................................................1-6 1.6 Report Organization....................................................................................................................1-7 2. Existing and Baseline Future Conditions................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Population...................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Demographics.............................................................................................................................2-6 2.3 Existing and Baseline Future Transportation System ...............................................................2-13 2.4 Bus and Shuttle Services..........................................................................................................2-21 2.5 Human Services Transportation ...............................................................................................2-34 2.6 Current Ridesharing Programs .................................................................................................2-35 2.7 Current Travel Patterns and Transit Share ...............................................................................2-36 2.8 Future Baseline Travel Patterns ...............................................................................................2-47 3. Identification of Target Markets and Problems to be Addressed............................. 3-1 3.1 Summary of Transit Markets in the Study Area ..........................................................................3-1 3.2 Rider Opinions............................................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Stakeholder Input........................................................................................................................3-4 3.4 Traveler Opinions from Web Survey...........................................................................................3-5 3.5 Improvement Needs ...................................................................................................................3-7 3.6 Improvement Concepts...............................................................................................................3-8 3.7 Development of Service Proposals...........................................................................................3-10 3.8 Service Guidelines....................................................................................................................3-11 4. Technical Analysis/Development of Candidate Improvements................................ 4-1 4.1 Proposed Service Improvements................................................................................................4-1 4.1.1. Service Concepts for the Sussex – Passaic Corridors .......................................................4-1 4.1.2. Service Concepts for the Sussex – Morris Corridors........................................................4-14 4.1.3. Service Concepts for the Morris County Corridors ...........................................................4-18 4.1.4. Service Concepts for the Warren – Morris Corridors........................................................4-30 4.1.5. Evaluation of Proposed Service Improvements................................................................4-36 4.2 Candidate Running Way Improvements ...................................................................................4-42 4.2.1. Types of Improvements....................................................................................................4-42 4.2.2. Evaluation of Running Way Improvements ......................................................................4-48 4.2.3. Summary of Findings .......................................................................................................4-53 Northwest New Jersey Bus Study FinalI. Report- December 2010 i 4.3 Candidate Passenger Facilities ................................................................................................4-57 4.3.1. Types of Passenger Facilities ..........................................................................................4-57 4.3.2. Assessment of Existing Park-and-Rides (by corridor) ......................................................4-58 4.3.3. Strategies for Existing Passenger Facilities .....................................................................4-67 4.3.4. New Shared-Use
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Housing Diversity and Affordability in New
    HOUSING DIVERSITY AND AFFORDABILITY IN NEW JERSEY’S TRANSIT VILLAGES By Dorothy Morallos Mabel Smith Honors Thesis Douglass College Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey April 11, 2006 Written under the direction of Professor Jan S. Wells Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy ABSTRACT New Jersey’s Transit Village Initiative is a major policy initiative, administered by the New Jersey Department of Transportation that promotes the concept of transit oriented development (TOD) by revitalizing communities and promoting residential and commercial growth around transit centers. Several studies have been done on TODs, but little research has been conducted on the effects it has on housing diversity and affordability within transit areas. This research will therefore evaluate the affordable housing situation in relation to TODs in within a statewide context through the New Jersey Transit Village Initiative. Data on the affordable housing stock of 16 New Jersey Transit Villages were gathered for this research. Using Geographic Information Systems Software (GIS), the locations of these affordable housing sites were mapped and plotted over existing pedestrian shed maps of each Transit Village. Evaluations of each designated Transit Village’s efforts to encourage or incorporate inclusionary housing were based on the location and availability of affordable developments, as well as the demographic character of each participating municipality. Overall, findings showed that affordable housing remains low amongst all the designated villages. However, new rules set forth by the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) may soon change these results and the overall affordable housing stock within the whole state.
    [Show full text]
  • Passaic River Walk, Station-To-Station
    Radburn PASSAIC RIVER WALK, STATION-TO-STATION Walking Route City Street or Path The Passaic River winds through a wide range of scenic, historical, industrial, and residential landscapes Passaic River on its ninety-mile course to the sea. Exploring the river in its entirety is nearly impossible on foot Train Station because only small sections have accessible parks or trail systems. A pedestrian must be ready Take a right here and for a journey that offers only occasional glimpses of the river, usually from bridge crossings, then shortly another right onto while moving through the neighborhoods that line its banks. This walk visits three majestic West Broadway and over the Passaic and moving places contained in a single day of walking: the Great Falls, the city of River. After passing Memorial Drive, turn left Paterson, and a precolonial stone weir. onto Broadway, and after one mile turn left onto Madison Avenue. The city of Paterson is built on a hill rounded on three The Walk: When you arrive at Paterson Station, walk to Market Street and take a sides by the Passaic River. Walking down Madison Avenue gives you left toward the one tall modern glass building. As you walk down Market Street, an understanding of the topography. There are also buses frequently foot traffic increases and historical architecture abounds. Market Street bends at running down Madison if you want a lift. After about a mile, at Fourth Washington Street, and in the distance you can see the start of the mill district Avenue, turn right and walk down the hill toward the Home Depot.
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322
    Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322 Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used. The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%. As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight. Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) New Jersey
    Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) for New Jersey By ORF 467 Transportation Systems Analysis, Fall 2004/05 Princeton University Prof. Alain L. Kornhauser Nkonye Okoh Mathe Y. Mosny Shawn Woodruff Rachel M. Blair Jeffery R Jones James H. Cong Jessica Blankshain Mike Daylamani Diana M. Zakem Darius A Craton Michael R Eber Matthew M Lauria Bradford Lyman M Martin-Easton Robert M Bauer Neset I Pirkul Megan L. Bernard Eugene Gokhvat Nike Lawrence Charles Wiggins Table of Contents: Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction to Personal Rapid Transit .......................................................................................... 3 New Jersey Coastline Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Burlington County (M. Mosney '06) ..............................................................................................6 Monmouth County (M. Bernard '06 & N. Pirkul '05) .....................................................................9 Hunterdon County (S. Woodruff GS .......................................................................................... 24 Mercer County (M. Martin-Easton '05) ........................................................................................31 Union County (B. Chu '05) ...........................................................................................................37 Cape May County (M. Eber '06) …...............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • As of May 13)
    MOTORCOACHES ROLLING FOR AWARENESS RALLY PARTICIPANTS (as of May 13) Accounts (by State) City State John Hall's Alaska Tours and Transportation Anchorage AK Camelot Charters Pell City AL Cline Tours Birmingham AL E & J Tours Birmingham AL Gulf Coast Tours Mobile AL Inventive Tours Tuscaloosa AL Kelton Tours Unlimited LLC Gadsden AL Southeastern Motor Coach, Inc. Birmingham AL Southern Coaches Dothan AL Spirit Coach LLC Madison AL Takers Transportation Huntsville AL Thrasher Brothers Trailways Vestavia Hills AL Tuscaloosa Charter Services Tuscaloosa AL Vineyard Tours, LLC St. Stephens AL Vision Express Tours Montgomery AL Arrow Coach Lines Inc Little Rock AR Little Rock Coaches Little Rock AR Mountain Home Charter Service, Inc. Mountain Home AR JET Limousines & Transportation LLC Phoenix AZ Amador Stage Lines Sacramento CA BEST-VIP Chauffeured Worldwide Santa Ana CA BUS-TECH Sacramento CA Empire Transportation Services FONTANA CA GCLA Los Angeles CA Golden West Travel, LLC Pleasanton CA Highline Charter inc. San Diego CA LA Charter Bus Lines Los Angeles CA Pacific Coachways Charter Services Garden Grove CA Royal Coach Tours San Jose CA Carreras Tours, LLC. Ontario CA Storer San Francisco San Francisco CA Transportation Charter Services, Inc Orange CA Ramblin Express Denver CO Bohannon & Vines Transportation Group, Llc Milford CT Coach Tours Brookfield CT DATTCO, Inc New Britain CT JB Tours &Travel West Haven CT Land Jet Inc Waterbury CT Post Road Stages South Windsor CT Post Road Stages South Windsor CT Rukstela Charter Service Eastford CT Town and Country Transportation Co New Britain CT Destination DC Washington DC International Spy Museum Washngton, DC DC My Dream Tour LLC Washington DC DC Delaware Express Newark DE Rohans Bus Service Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Pages Test
    Library & Archives Book Catalog Passaic County Historical Society Museum ~ Library ~ Archives Lambert Castle, 3 Valley Road, Paterson, New Jersey 07503-2932 Phone: (973) 247-0085 • Fax: (973) 881-9434 email: [email protected] www.lambertcastle.org May 2019 PASSAIC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Library & Archives Book Catalog L.O.C. Call Number 100 Years of Collecting in America; The Story of Sotheby Parke Bernet N 5215 .N6 1984 Thomas E. Norton H.N. Abrams, 1984 108 Steps around Macclesfield: A Walker’s Guide DA 690 .M3 W4 1994 Andrew Wild Sigma Leisure, 1994 1637-1887. The Munson record. A Genealogical and Biographical Account of CS 71 .M755 1895 Vol. 1 Captain Thomas Munson (A Pioneer of Hartford and New Haven) and his Descendants Munson Association, 1895 1637-1887. The Munson record. A Genealogical and Biographical Account of CS 71 .M755 1895 Vol. 2 Captain Thomas Munson (A Pioneer of Hartford and New Haven) and his Descendants Munson Association, 1895 1736-1936 Historical Discourse Delivered at the Celebration of the Two-Hundredth BX 9531 .P7 K4 1936 Anniversary of the First Reformed Church of Pompton Plains, New Jersey Eugene H. Keator, 1936 1916 Photographic Souvenir of Hawthorne, New Jersey F144.H6 1916 S. Gordon Hunt, 1916 1923 Catalogue of Victor Records, Victor Talking Machine Company ML 156 .C572 1923 Museums Council of New Jersey, 1923 25 years of the Jazz Room at William Paterson University ML 3508 .T8 2002 Joann Krivin; William Paterson University of New Jersey William Paterson University, 2002 25th Anniversary of the City of Clifton Exempt Firemen’s Association TH 9449 .C8 B7 1936 1936 300th Anniversary of the Bergen Reformed Church – Old Bergen 1660-1960 BX 9531 .J56 B4 1960 Jersey City, NJ: Old Bergen Church of Jersey City, New Jersey Bergen Reformed Church, 1960 50th Anniversary, Hawthorne, New Jersey, 1898-1948 F 144.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge At the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge, we conserve the biological diversity of the Wallkill Valley by protecting and managing land, with a special emphasis on s% i 7 7 7* 7 migrating wate / fo wl, wintering raptors, and endangered species, while providing \ opportunities for scientific research J *tind compatible I public use. ' Our Mission Congress established the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge in 1990 "to preserve and enhance refuge lands and waters in a manner that will conserve the natural diversity of fish, wildlife, plants, This blue goose, and their habitats for present and designed by J.N. future generations and to provide "Ding" Darling, opportunities for compatible has become the scientific research, environmental symbol of the education, and fish and wildlife- National Wildlife oriented recreation." Congress Refuge System. /. also required the protection of •/. aquatic habitats within the refuge, •- including the Wallkill River and '53 Papakating Creek. - The individual purposes of this Wallkill River refuge are supported by the mission in fall The refuge is located along a nine-mile of the National Wildlife Refuge stretch of the Wallkill River, and lies in System, of which the Wallkill River a rolling valley within the Appalachian refuge is a part. That mission is Ridge and Valley physiographic "to administer a national network province. The Wallkill Valley is of lands and waters for the bounded by the Kittatinny Ridge to conservation, management, and the west and the New York/New where appropriate, restoration of Jersey Highlands to the east. This the fish, wildlife, and plant resources area is part of the Great Valley, which and their habitats within the United extends from Canada to the southern States for the benefit of present and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex County Open Space and Recreation Plan.”
    OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN for the County of Sussex “People and Nature Together” Compiled by Morris Land Conservancy with the Sussex County Open Space Committee September 30, 2003 County of Sussex Open Space and Recreation Plan produced by Morris Land Conservancy’s Partners for Greener Communities team: David Epstein, Executive Director Laura Szwak, Assistant Director Barbara Heskins Davis, Director of Municipal Programs Robert Sheffield, Planning Manager Tanya Nolte, Mapping Manager Sandy Urgo, Land Preservation Specialist Anne Bowman, Land Acquisition Administrator Holly Szoke, Communications Manager Letty Lisk, Office Manager Student Interns: Melissa Haupt Brian Henderson Brian Licinski Ken Sicknick Erin Siek Andrew Szwak Dolce Vieira OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN for County of Sussex “People and Nature Together” Compiled by: Morris Land Conservancy a nonprofit land trust with the County of Sussex Open Space Advisory Committee September 2003 County of Sussex Board of Chosen Freeholders Harold J. Wirths, Director Joann D’Angeli, Deputy Director Gary R. Chiusano, Member Glen Vetrano, Member Susan M. Zellman, Member County of Sussex Open Space Advisory Committee Austin Carew, Chairperson Glen Vetrano, Freeholder Liaison Ray Bonker Louis Cherepy Libby Herland William Hookway Tom Meyer Barbara Rosko Eric Snyder Donna Traylor Acknowledgements Morris Land Conservancy would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their help in providing information, guidance, research and mapping materials for the County of
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 5: Thinkfang
    Frank Edward Nora Thinkfang THINKFANG by Frank Edward Nora The First Edition was published in 2003 and was called Duskaway Parking . This Second Edition is being published on August 12, 2009 and was renamed Thinkfang . Published by Frank Edward Nora New Jersey, USA onsug.com • [email protected] Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ INTRODUCTION (FROM THE FIRST EDITION) Duskaway Parking is composed of 1,103 little numbered poems called “Superiors”. I wrote these over the course of 11 years, from late February 1992 to late February 2003. The Superiors originally appeared in my weekly ezine, “OsoaWeek”, which I published on my website. The Superiors began as poetry, but over time began to include other themes. Some of them are brief essays. Others are like diary entries. And some are like little science fiction stories. They are full of beauty and ugliness, focus and blur, just like life. The best of them still amaze me, and the worst make me cringe and shake my head. But all of them are here, in this book, in their original form. One aspect of Superior that has confused some people is all the made-up words and names and places. These are straight from my hyperactive creative mind, and in many instances I feel they convey ideas and images and atmospheres better than any real words. And keep in mind the science fiction aspect, with all sorts of mysterious characters, locales, and powers. And also keep in mind that there are references to real, but obscure, things as well, which does tend to muddle things a bit..
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex County Transit Guide 2012-2.Indd
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR RIDERS/INFORMACIÓN IMPORTANTE PARA PASAJEROS How to Board the Bus Cómo abordar el autobús of a mile of existing bus routes. Users must fi rst de autobús existente. Access Link proporciona Rail Service in Middlesex County Servicio Ferroviario en el Condado de OPTION CONDITIONS OF USE SAVINGS (over one-way fare) WHO SHOULD USE THIS OPTION? Where they exist, passengers should wait for Donde existen, los pasajeros deben esperar al apply and meet certain eligibility requirements. transporte con reserva el dia anterior de acera a Middlesex OPCIÓN CONDICIONES DE USO AHORROS (sobre pasaje sencillo) A QUIEN CORRESPONDE ESTA OPCIÓN? the bus at offi cial bus stops that are identifi able autobús en las paradas ofi ciales, reconocidos por For more information about Access Link service in acera desde localidades dentro de ¾ de milla de Middlesex County is served by four diff erent El Condado de Middlesex es servida por cuatro rail lines: NJ TRANSIT commuter passenger rail líneas ferroviarias diferentes: servicios ferroviarios One-way Ticket Valid on any single trip; valid until used (no Occasional riders by the presence of bus stop signs. Where bus la presencia de letreros de parada de autobús. Middlesex County, call 800-955-ADA1. las rutas de autobús existentes. Los usuarios prim- Pasaje sencillo expiration)/Válido en cualquier pasaje sencillo; pasajeros esporádicos stop signs do not exist, riders may stop the bus Donde no existe letrero, los pasajeros pueden Middlesex County Area Transit for Senior/ ero deben aplicar y cumplir con ciertos requisitos services via the Northeast Corridor Line, the de NJ TRANSIT a través del Northeast Corridor vale hasta usado (no se vence) by fl agging it down by waving a hand high in señalar al conductor a traves de sacudir la mano Disabled Residents (MCAT): Middlesex de elegibilidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Morris County Metro
    FARE ZONES Customer Services NJ Transit Information MORRIS COUNTY Zone 1: Milton (Milton Road) to Commendations/ Complaints Schedule, Fare and Lost & Found Milton (Pioneer Tr.) METRO Customer Service . 1 (973) 275-5555 Information Zone 2: Milton (Pioneer Tr.) to Transit Information & Lift Rockaway Mall Equipped Bus Reservations . 1 (973) 275-5555 Zone 3: Rockaway Mall to Text Telephone (TT) . 1 (800) 772-2287 Randolph (Kmart Plaza) PABCO Transit Lost & Found . 1 (973) 328-7686 MILTON Morris County DOT . 1 (973) 829-8100 7 KMART PLAZA Port Authority Bus Terminal Information . 1 (212) 564-8484 AMTRAK Information . 1 (800) 872-7245 How to use this schedule NY Waterway Bus/Ferry Effective: July 1, 2005 Information . .1 (800) 53-FERRY 1. Choose the direction you wish to travel and Revised: June 2008 locate the WEEKDAY, SATURDAY or Lakeland Bus Lines. (973) 366-0600 SUNDAY schedule. Timepoints are listed from Long Island Railroad Information1 (718) 217-5477 Serving: Milton the beginning of the route (on the left) to the end Metro-North Commuter Railroad Lake Swannanoa (on the right). Information . 1 (212) 532-4900 2. Timepoints in the schedule correspond with the Newark Airport Ground Jefferson timepoint dots on the map. If your stop is Transportation Information . 1 (800) 247-7433 Rockaway Twp. between two timepoints, use the earlier time as NYC Transit Authority Rockaway Mall a guide. Information (Bus and Subway) . 1 (718) 330-1234 Dover 3. If there is a letter to the left of the times listed for PATH Information . 1 (800) 234-7284 Randolph the trip you wish to take, look for the explanation Service on this line is operated under or next to the schedule block.
    [Show full text]