Markets, Governance and Networks As Developing in English Regions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Markets, Governance and Networks As Developing in English Regions Universities and Regional Advantage in the Knowledge Economy: Markets, Governance and Networks as Developing in English Regions Fumi Kitagawa A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The Centre for Urban and Regional Studies School of Public Policy The University of Birmingham October 2003 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis examines the links developing between the universities and their regions in the globalising knowledge economy as observed in the UK. It examines institutional responses to two realms of policies, namely, higher education policy and regional development policy. The diversifying missions of universities, especially, the ‘third stream activities’ promoted by the UK government since the late 1990s, are set against the dynamics of the multi-level territorial governance structure emerging within Europe. The key question examined is: can the new institutional strategies of universities in order to compete in a globalising market be reconciled with the increased emphasis upon their regional engagement in various policy agendas? The tensions created here are explored through an examination of policy discourses, and by means of empirical evidence concerning different institutional networks in different spatial contexts, in particular, in the West Midlands Region and at the University of Birmingham. Applying Jessop’s strategic-relational approach to institutions, networks are conceptualised as strategic alliances creating the dynamics of regional innovation systems emerging within the nine English regions. The thesis argues that harnessing universities to the creation of regional advantage involves building networks of knowledge flows across different spatial scales at which the knowledge economy is organised. Acknowledgements I hereby express my sincere gratitude to the following bodies and people. First of all, I would like to thank the School of Public Policy, the University of Birmingham, for financial support through which I could conduct my research and maintain myself for the three years of period of study. Gratitude is also expressed to Universities UK for providing an Overseas Research Scholarship award (ORS) which covered the fee differences between EU and non-EU students. I would like to thank my supervisors at the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies (CURS), the School of Public Policy. Without them, the endeavour of conducting PhD research would not have been possible. Mr. Chris Collinge has supervised my thesis for the last three years. Mrs. Barbara Smith has always given me warm encouragement, and checked through my writing very neatly. I am very grateful for sharing the history of the University of Birmingham with Barbara through the thesis. Mr. Chris Watson, who initially introduced me to CURS, has provided me with very warm support, especially towards the end of my PhD thesis. Dr. John Gibney gave very useful suggestions and comments as a second supervisor in my first year of the study. I would also like to thank the panel members (Dr. Stewart MacNeil, Mr. David Mullins), who provided useful suggestions and comments throughout my study period. A big word of thanks goes to Ms. Sue Truman for every support she gave me. I am grateful to all the staff and colleague PhD students at the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, who gave me stimuli and encouragement on various occasions. Special thanks go to Kath Morgan and Lynne Beighton for their encouragement and for taking me out of the campus from time to time. Without all these people, I would not have completed the study at the Centre. I would also like to express my gratitude to the following organisations and people, as they have played essential roles in my PhD journey. Firstly, the Regional Studies Association (RSA), for a number of conferences and social networks from which I benefited tremendously as a research student. Special thanks go to Sally Harding and Lisa Bibby Larsen of RSA. Another learned society, the Society for Research into Higher Education, provided me with insights and networks into the research into higher education. I am grateful to Mr. Richard Yelland and Mrs. Jacqueline Smith and their colleagues at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), who provided me with an opportunity to work as a trainee for several months in 2002. Special gratitude goes to the following people who have acted as academic ‘mentors’ through conferences, research interviews, publications and other occasions: Prof. John Goddard, Prof. David Charles, Dr. Paul Benneworth, Prof. Phil Cooke, Prof. Kevin Morgan, Prof. Mike Taylor, Dr. Jon Potter, Prof. Ian McNay, Prof. Chris Duke, and Ms. Beth Perry. Thanks also go to the friends/research students outside Birmingham whom I met during my study for sharing anxiety and aspiration of conducting PhD research. I would like to express my sincere thanks to those who answered my questions as part of my research at the University of Birmingham, in the West Midlands Region and other regions in England, in Paris and Brussels. I am not listing the names here, but without these interviewees, this research could not have been done and I am mostly grateful to all of them for sharing their time, their thoughts and experiences with me. Some of them kindly gave comments on my draft chapters, for which I am most grateful. Finally, I would like to thank my Japanese friends and family, and friends in other parts of the world for warm encouragement and kind support throughout my study. This has been a wonderful journey, thanks to all those who have helped me, and I would like to thank them all. Fumi Kitagawa Preface One of the interviewees said to me before answering my interview questions at The Sack of Potatoes, a pub near one of the science parks in the West Midlands Region. “Why did you come to England? Why are you doing research with such a topic? You are a complete enigma!” This represents the perception of one interviewee of the interviewer (see Chapter 2). Three years have passed so quickly. I came from Japan, and I came to Birmingham and started my PhD study in October 2000. It is worth noting here why I came to Birmingham to do a PhD as this seems to be one of the most common questions that people ask me when I say “I am doing PhD at the University of Birmingham”. It started from a contact I had made at the University of Oxford. One of the ESRC funded programmes Transnational Communities was based in the Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology at University of Oxford. One of the projects under the programme was on “Japanese expatriate business communities in the UK” and, as a former student of International Relations and Cultural and Social Anthropology, that was my initial interest before I launched on my PhD. In early 2000, I visited one of the researchers who had conducted research on Japanese multinational firms in Telford, a New Town in the West Midlands and, through this researcher, I was introduced to Mr. Chris Watson, the Director of the Japan Centre of the University of Birmingham. After discussion with Mr. Watson, I decided to apply for a PhD place at the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies. Then, my academic interest was in the linkages between knowledge production of multinational firms and local/regional economic development. I wrote a research proposal and, very fortunately, I was accepted and awarded a research studentship at the School of Public Policy and further financial support from ORS. In the summer of 2000, before formally starting the PhD study, I conducted a short preliminary research project on Japanese multinationals in Telford, and about the West Midlands Region. Mr. Watson gave me a couple of key policy documents, which were just published by the Regional Development Agency, Advantage West Midlands, and other regional bodies. This was the start. I noticed that in Regional Innovation Strategy and in its Action Plans, there were many references to Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) as lead partners. Around the same time, I visited Telford, and realised that one of the Japanese multinationals was located just next door to the Telford campus of Wolverhampton University. My intuition worked. I thought there was something interesting going on with Universities in the Region. This is how it started. I rewrote my research proposal and the title of my thesis became “Higher Education and Regional Development Processes” though the title has changed since. Throughout my PhD research, I have encountered so many people, and a number of them became good friends, mentors and e-mail friends throughout my research. The encounters came through conferences, seminars, research interviews, and a work placement and a number of various other occasions. Also, I travelled a lot in Birmingham, the West Midlands Region, England, the UK, in Europe, and sometimes between Japan and the UK, to attend conferences, interview people, and to ‘network’. The rest of the thesis gives theoretical and empirical accounts of the changing landscapes of English higher education and regional development processes as I have experienced them. This is my own academic and personal account, but it is indeed part of the big national and global landscape. I could only write this thesis through all these encounters I have had over the last three years’ time.
Recommended publications
  • View 2019 Edition Online
    Emmanuel Emmanuel College College MAGAZINE 2018–2019 Front Court, engraved by R B Harraden, 1824 VOL CI MAGAZINE 2018–2019 VOLUME CI Emmanuel College St Andrew’s Street Cambridge CB2 3AP Telephone +44 (0)1223 334200 The Master, Dame Fiona Reynolds, in the new portrait by Alastair Adams May Ball poster 1980 THE YEAR IN REVIEW I Emmanuel College MAGAZINE 2018–2019 VOLUME CI II EMMANUEL COLLEGE MAGAZINE 2018–2019 The Magazine is published annually, each issue recording college activities during the preceding academical year. It is circulated to all members of the college, past and present. Copy for the next issue should be sent to the Editors before 30 June 2020. News about members of Emmanuel or changes of address should be emailed to [email protected], or via the ‘Keeping in Touch’ form: https://www.emma.cam.ac.uk/members/keepintouch. College enquiries should be sent to [email protected] or addressed to the Development Office, Emmanuel College, Cambridge CB2 3AP. General correspondence concerning the Magazine should be addressed to the General Editor, College Magazine, Dr Lawrence Klein, Emmanuel College, Cambridge CB2 3AP. Correspondence relating to obituaries should be addressed to the Obituaries Editor (The Dean, The Revd Jeremy Caddick), Emmanuel College, Cambridge CB2 3AP. The college telephone number is 01223 334200, and the email address is [email protected]. If possible, photographs to accompany obituaries and other contributions should be high-resolution scans or original photos in jpeg format. The Editors would like to express their thanks to the many people who have contributed to this issue, with a special nod to the unstinting assistance of the College Archivist.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Improving Academic-Policy Engagement
    July 2019 Understanding and Navigating the Landscape of Evidence-based Policy Recommendations for Improving Academic-policy Engagement Lindsay Walker, Lindsey Pike, Chris Chambers, Natalia Lawrence, Marsha Wood and Hannah Durrant The University of Bath Institute for Policy Research (IPR) is a leading institute of public policy research in the UK. We undertake and enable policy relevant research to make an impact, especially through building links with the worlds of policy and practice as well as by increasing public understanding of policy research through our public events and publications series. We deliver activities for policymakers, researchers and practitioners to enable two-way learning and original contributions to both research and practice, delivered through our Policy Fellowship Programme, Professional Doctorate, Masters in Public Policy, run in collaboration with our Department of Social and Policy Sciences, and Visiting Fellows and Visiting Policy Fellows Schemes. www.bath.ac.uk/ipr PolicyBristol aims to enhance the influence and impact of research from across the University of Bristol on policy and practice at the local, national and international level. We build connections between academics and policymakers through our Fellowship scheme, academic funding support scheme, and by supporting high quality events to stimulate knowledge exchange and reciprocal benefit. Our growing team draws on the evidence base to inform our activities, to ensure that University of Bristol research benefits society and supports evidence-informed policymaking. To find out more about our work, please visit www.bristol.ac.uk/policybristol/ Understanding and Navigating the Landscape of Evidence- based Policy Recommendations for Improving Academic-policy Engagement This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the ERC Consolidator Grant awarded to Professor Chris Chambers (grant agreement No 647893).
    [Show full text]
  • A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands
    A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands June 2017 A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Contents Foreword 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Economic and research landscape .................................................................................... 4 3. The West Midlands SIA Framework ................................................................................. 15 4. Innovation Ecosystem ....................................................................................................... 18 5. Enabling Competencies .................................................................................................... 38 6. Market Strengths ................................................................................................................ 49 7. Key findings and moving forward .................................................................................... 73 Annex A: Case Studies ........................................................................................................ A-1 www.sqw.co.uk A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Foreword In a year of change and challenge on other fronts, this last year has also been one of quiet revolution. This year has seen a dramatic increase across the UK in the profile of science and innovation as a key driver of productivity and its potential to improve the way our public services are delivered. The potential has always
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Isolation and Progression to Higher Education
    The influence of place: Geographical isolation and progression to higher education February 2019 A powerful urban-rural divide, as much as a regional one between north and south, is marked in terms of the way urban centres operate as foci of cultural capital and social capital.1 There is a stark contrast between the widening participation and outreach activities (both university and third-sector provided) that exist in London and what is present in culturally and economically deprived communities in peripheral areas. London has an infrastructure for widening participation and outreach on a scale which simply does not exist in more peripheral parts of the country. Student mobility on entry to university occurs against a backdrop of highly unequal access to cultural enrichment and outreach for students post-16.2 The combination of poor transport links and lack of local higher education provision can mean that moving away from home is the only option for young people living in some rural communities. This appears to be a barrier for some. The higher costs and the added risks involved in studying away from home make this option less appealing to some young people and those who are less confident that higher education is right for them.3 The moralistic coupling of education and leaving generates a discourse of schooled salvation that, as usual, elevates the already privileged.4 1 Mike Savage. (2015) Social Class in the 21st Century, London: Penguin, p. 296. 2 Michael Donnelly and Sol Gamsu. (2018) ‘Home and Away: Social, ethnic, and spatial inequalities in student mobility’, The Sutton Trust, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing to One's Strengths
    ISSUE 29 Quarterly Journal - December 2018 NEWS COMMENT and ANALYSIS on SPINOUTS from UK HEIs Playing to one’s strengths As we have frequently remarked, and as the figures given in our Quarterly Journals demonstrate, spinout activity—new spinouts created, investment, exits - is highly concentrated in the South East of England. While universities such as Oxford and Cambridge, Imperial and UCL, go from strength to strength, making the most of their favourable environment - business, technology, investment - outside the ‘golden triangle’ it is not possible for universities to replicate the same conditions, and they must identify their own strengths and put them to maximum effect. We have two examples in this issue: Univeresity of Birmingham Enterprise’s account of the commercialisation collaboration between eight Midlands universities (p17), and our Spotlight feature on Swansea University (p15), which has evolved a technology transfer model tailored specifically to its own circumstances. Encouragingly, the Knowledge Exchange Framework (KEF) currently under development acknowledges this issue, and has set out to group universities in clusters, so that universities in the most favoured environments can be assessed against their peers, and others judged by criteria more relevant to their own environments; see our report on p13. Since the publication of our previous Quarterly Journal, the sale of Spinouts UK to Beauhurst has been completed. Henry Whorwood of Beauhurst explains what this means in terms of tracking and profiling spinout companies on p8. There will be a transitional handover period, with Spinouts UK founder and editor Jonathan Harris continuing to produce the Quarterly Journals, while Beauhurst gradually takes over the data collection activities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine
    A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report 01 November 2016 A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report Contents Midlands Engine SIA – the headlines ....................................................................................1 1. Introduction to the Midlands Engine SIA...........................................................................4 2. SIA ‘hypotheses’ and ‘framework’ ...................................................................................10 3. Regional science and innovation assets and excellence..............................................19 4. Innovation strengths and our growth priorities..............................................................30 5. Market and technology drivers of change.......................................................................53 6. Innovation networks and behaviours ..............................................................................59 7. Next Steps – unlocking our productivity potential.........................................................67 A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report Midlands Engine SIA – the headlines 1. In Autumn 2015 the UK Government announced regional Science and Innovation Audits (SIAs) to catalyse
    [Show full text]
  • Thebrazennose2004.Pdf
    The Brazen Nose 2003 2 THE BRAZEN NOSE Brasenose Society The object of the Society shall be the advancement of the welfare and interests of Brasenose College by: (i) encouraging closer relations between past and present members of the College and fostering interests which they have in common; (ii) keeping members of the Society informed of events in the College; (iii) any other methods which from time to time appear likely to achieve the Society's object. [Revised 1999] ★ The Brasenose College Charitable Foundation USA William W. Sterling [1961] is President of the BNC Charitable Foundation. His address is: 1821 Shoreline Highway Sausalito, CA 94965, USA. Members of the College resident in the USA are urged to keep him informed of their addresses. ★ Please note that details and application forms for all Brasenose Society events in 2004 will be found in the back pages of this issue. 3 Contents Brasenose College...........................................................4 Editors’ Notes................................................................. 9 College Records 2003: ...................................................13 Class Lists College Prizes and University Prizes Award Holders Matriculations Blues and Half Blues Articles........................................................................... 29 Reports............................................................................62 News and Notes..............................................................85 Death and Obituary Notices..........................................95
    [Show full text]
  • UKRI Open Access Policy: Summary of Stakeholder Workshops and Consultation Meetings
    UKRI Open Access Policy: Summary of stakeholder workshops and consultation meetings Contents: 1. UK Research and Innovation Open Access Review Universities Stakeholder Roundtable – Meeting Note..................................................................................................................................2 2. UKRI Open Access Review Stakeholder Roundtable Libraries, Research Management and Knowledge Exchange – Meeting Note..........................................................................................12 3. UK Research and Innovation Open Access Review Stakeholder Academies and Learned Societies Roundtable – Meeting Note...........................................................................................21 4. UKRI Open Access Review Stakeholder Roundtable Publishers Association – Meeting Note....32 5. UKRI Open Access Review International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers Stakeholder Roundtable – Meeting Note....................................................................41 6. UKRI Open Access Review Stakeholder Roundtable Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) – Meeting Note...........................................................................................50 7. UKRI Open Access Review Licensing and Copyright Retention Workshop – Meeting Note........59 8. UKRI Open Access Review Metadata Workshop - Meeting Note................................................78 9. UKRI Open Access Review Researcher Workshop – Meeting Note...........................................93
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Features in Spinouts UK
    ISSUE 27 Quarterly Journal - June 2018 NEWS COMMENT and ANALYSIS on SPINOUTS from UK HEIs Measuring what is important TEF, REF, then KEF – university staff are used to dealing with Government TLAs and the administration that they entail, and the KEF (Knowledge Exchange Frame- work) brings this activity into the space covered by Spinouts UK. We are well aware that our focus on spinouts and start-ups is only one part of the picture; indeed, as stressed by the report by the MacMillan group in September 2016 on ‘University Knowledge Exchange (KE) Framework: good practice in technology transfer’, “the processes of exploiting university intellectual property through spinning out companies or licensing . is only one route to impact from the many being examined in the knowledge exchange (KE) framework.” The development of the KEF was discussed in detail at the PraxisAuril conference in May, and some of the concerns and questions of the technology transfer and commercialisation professionals in the audience given a full airing. The KEF is due to be rolled out from late autumn onwards, but this timescale means that the first KEF will be restricted to existing data, with other data capture part of an ongoing process. As Tamsin Mann, Head of Policy at PraxisAuril, noted in a blog about the conference discussion, “Evidence underpinning the KEF needs to be challenging and not just measure ‘the good stuff’. There is a clear desire, from PraxisAuril members at least, to capture the quality of engagement and not just the quantities.” Clarity is required, as the KEF is developed, on who it is for and the kind of feedback needed as outputs, and what the KEF can help institutions to do that is not possible with current arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Key Role of Non-UK Postgraduate Research Students
    Preserving the DNA of UK universities: the key role of non-UK postgraduate research students Ludovic Highman and Simon Marginson 17 July 2018 § Introduction We cannot understand the risks posed by Brexit to the UK higher education (HE) system simply by taking a bird’s eye view of the system at the macro-level, treating the ‘university’ as a one and indivisible unit and the ‘student’ as a one-size-fits-all category. This misses the diversity of higher education institutions (HEIs), the multitude of disciplines they harbour that cater for all dimensions of human activity and the different types of students they enrol. We offer a more fine-grained analysis, focusing on one dimension of higher education and research with many ramifications. That is the role of non-UK postgraduate research students in UK research. These students substantially enhance UK research capacity and teaching excellence and UK HEIs are highly dependent on them. § The UK higher education system as a kaleidoscope of HEIs Not all HEIs are equally affected by Brexit, or affected in the same ways. Even within membership groups, such as the Russell Group, MillionPlus, the United Kingdom Arts and Design Institutions Association (ukadia) or University Alliance, each university is different. Each has a distinctive mission and set of core activities, based on the disciplinary mix which defines its course offering, research capacity and intensity, wealth, size, location, selectivity, target audience and its regional, national and/or international engagement. Some universities are located in global cities, others are rural and depend on a narrowly defined regional intake.
    [Show full text]
  • Medilink East Midlands Innovation Day Thursday 15 June 2017 Delegate List
    Medilink East Midlands Innovation Day Thursday 15 June 2017 Delegate List Firstname Surname Job Title Company Aisha Ajij Project Support and Industry Liaison Officer East Midlands Academic Health Science Network Jim Allen Development Director Datalink Electronics Ltd Lindsay Allen Senior Programme Manager D2N2 Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Clare Allen Speech Language Therapist The Ear Foundation Michele Archer Business Development Haughton Design Alex Archibald Business Development Manager Midlands Health Innovation Carol Aries Non Executive Director Medilink East Midlands Richard Arm Research Fellow Nottingham Trent University Chris Armstrong Marketing Manager Health Enterprise East Ltd Judith Asiimwe Team Leader Ayva Pharma Ltd Shaun Atherton Innovation Engineer Nottingham Trent University Sheetal Athlaye Audiologist The Ear Foundation Edward Attenborough CEO Attenborough Dental Laboratories Ltd Jensen Aw CTO Attenborough Dental Laboratories Ltd Khushy Bahra Account Manager Ayva Pharma Ltd John Bannard Managing Director Siltech Ltd Tim Bassford Creative Director Spinning Clock Ltd Nick Bennett Head of Product Development IVC Brunel Healthcare James Bennett Junior Designer Pd-m International Kate Beresford Director Kate Beresford Associates George Billingham Account Manager Ayva Pharma Ltd Mark Bird Head of IT Upperton Ltd Nicholas Blackwell Director OCB Media Chris Blatchford Senior Analytical Specialist 3M UK Ltd Sarah Bolton Business Manager CHEATA Clare Booth Partnership Development Manager Department for International Trade
    [Show full text]
  • British Muslims in Uk Higher Education Report
    OCTOBER 2018REPORT: BRITISH MUSLIMS IN UK HIGHER EDUCATION REPORT British Muslims in UK Higher Education Socio-political, religious and policy considerations Dr Abida Malik Dr Emily Wykes i Acknowledgments Thank you to HESA for providing the data for this report. Appreciation is also shown to ONS for the data that enabled the construction of a demographic profile of British Muslims in the UK. Bridge Institute is especially grateful to Professor Tariq Modood for his advice on academic sources of literature, and Dr Kate Legge and her research colleagues at the University of Loughborough for access to their thorough and in-depth case study. We would also like to thank Shenaz Bunglawala for offering her invaluable advice, suggestions and guidance to create specific links to policy. Finally, thanks are expressed to the Aziz Foundation and Penny Appeal. ISBN: 978-1-912538-02-7 Published by the Bridge Institute in October 2018, this document is copyright © Bridge Institute 2018. The moral rights of the authors have been asserted. Bridge Institute for Research and Policy Lower Ground Floor, 40 Bloomsbury Way London, WC1A 2SE 020 7041 8474 http://bridgeinstitute.co.uk/ twitter: https://twitter.com/BridgeThinkTank Contents Executive summary 2 Policy recommendations 2 1. Introduction 4 2. Political contexts, legislations and policies: British Muslims in HE 7 Government strategies 7 The Higher Education and Research Bill (2017) 7 The government’s consideration of Sharia-compliant loans 8 3. HESA Data 10 Information about the data, and data collection
    [Show full text]