DOCSLIB.ORG

The British Innovation Fund Investing in the Best of UK University Venturing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The British Innovation Fund Investing in the Best of UK University Venturing The British Innovation Fund Investing in the Best of UK University Venturing For discussion purposes with Professional Investors only 2Q 2020 BRITISH INNOVATION FUND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key Areas of Specialty: Agricultural Bio- Technologies technology The BIF has been backed by some of The BIF is managed in the leading local The British Innovation partnership with government pension Deep Tech Life Sciences Milltrust International LLP Fund (BIF) is an schemes in the and Milltrust Agricultural AIFMD-compliant United Kingdom patient capital venture Investments, and supported by an capital fund investing in cutting edge spin- Alternative Advisory team of Nano Tech investment specialists outs emanating from Protein and agricultural and leading UK university research. scientific experts. 2 INVESTMENT PREMISE “Exploration is the engine that drives innovation. Innovation drives economic growth.” - Edith Widder 3 INVESTMENT PREMISE A BRIEF HISTORY OF BRITISH INNOVATION Sir Isaac Newton, PRS 25 December 1642 – 20 March 1726 Sir Alexander Fleming, FRS FRSE FRCS English mathematician, physicist, astronomer, 6 August 1881 – 11 March 1955 theologian, and author widely recognised as one of the Scottish biologist, physician, micro-biologist, most influential scientists of all time and as a key figure and pharmacologist. Inventor of Penicillin. in the scientific revolution. Edward Jenner, FRS FRCPE FLS John Logie Baird, FRSE 17 May 1749 – 26 January 1823 13 August 1888 – 14 June 1946 English physician who was a contributor to the Scottish engineer and innovator. One of the inventors of development of the smallpox vaccine. the mechanical television. Michael Faraday, FRS 22 September 1791 – 25 August 1867 John Adrian Shepherd-Barron, OBE English scientist who contributed to the study 23 June 1925 – 15 May 2010 of electromagnetism and electrochemistry. Main British inventor who led the team that installed the discoveries include the principles of first ATM cash machine. underlying Electromagnetic induction, diamagnetism and electrolysis. Charles Babbage, KH FRS Stephen William Hawkins 26 December 1791 – 18 October 1871 8 January 1942 – 14 March 2018 English polymath. A mathematician, philosopher, English theoretical physicist, cosmologist, inventor and mechanical engineer, Babbage originated and author who was director of research at the Centre the concept of a digital programmable computer. for Theoretical Cosmology at the University of Cambridge. Charles Robert Darwin, FRS FRGS FLS FZS Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882 8 June 1955 - Present English naturalist, geologist and biologist, best known for English engineer and computer scientist. Inventor of his contributions to the science of evolution. the World Wide Web. Source: Wikipedia 4 INVESTMENT PREMISE MEET THE KEY MINDS BEHIND OUR PORTFOLIO Scott White, Founder & CEO of PragmatIC, invented and now A world beating set of mass-production of early stage investments nano RFID from the top scientists at Partnering the UK’s communicators which Andrew Shaw, Founder one of the world’s leading animal track products through & CEO of Attomarker greatest universities research institute to their life cycle and Associate Professor improve the food of Physical Chemistry, chain, enhance animal University of Exeter, at welfare and pioneer the forefront of the UK’s alternative proteins fight against COVID-19 with rapid antibody test 5 INVESTMENT PREMISE WHY UK UNIVERSITIES THE KEY RATIONALE FOR THE BRITISH INNOVATION FUND (“BIF”) Key statistics UK universities struggle to raise capital to commercialise world class UK universities in top research versus US counterparts despite pioneering science and 10 of global rankings groundbreaking innovations 4 (Oxford; Cambridge; 1 UCL; and Imperial ) BIF provides capital to support early stage spin-out companies through investment via: UK universities in top • University commercialisation companies and university 18 100 of global rankings1 incubators; or • Directly into spin-outs. Spin-out and staff 4,052 start-ups created from Spin-outs must have a viable commercial business and generate 2 universities in the UK revenue Source: 1QS World University Rankings 2020; and Higher Education Business; Advanced ideas reside in academia – incubators search these out 2Community Interaction (HEBCI) surveys 2002/03 - 2017/18 and come to us for acceleration funding once proven 6 ABOUT US “A dream will not become an innovation if there is no realization.” - Ciputra 7 ABOUT US INVESTMENT MANAGER MILLTRUST INTERNATIONAL 3,600+ Stocks held Selection of Milltrust is a UK and across six continents Recent Awards: Singapore-based investment group founded Milltrust is the provider 20 Industry awards in 2010 by an experienced and investment manager team of institutional of a range of sustainable #1 Ranked investors and focused on institutional investment Global EMerging Markets sustainable impact solutions focused on equity strategy investing. The firm is Global Emerging Markets, 10,000+ Hectares of regulated by the FCA (UK). Agriculture Investments, diversified land Science, technology & under cultivation innovation, and Climate Change investments. 19 Investment manager partnerships 8 ABOUT US INVESTMENT ADVISER MILLTRUST AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENTS LTD Milltrust Agricultural The Farmland funds are The British Innovation Fund The investment team Investments (“MAI”) focused on agricultural (“BIF”) invests in university has an average of 20 serves as the adviser to investments in the commercialisation years’ investment the MAI Australia and southern hemisphere. companies, incubators and management New Zealand Buy & Lease spin-out companies experience. Farmland Funds, and to The funds aim to provide emanating from UK the British Innovation investors with an income universities. The investment team is Fund generating, inflation advised by investment adjusted, long duration The fund has specific specialists and investment that is lowly expertise within the areas of agricultural and correlated with other agricultural technologies, scientific experts. asset classes biotechnology, nano tech, deep tech and life sciences 9 ABOUT US HISTORY OF MAI AND THE BIF Milltrust Creation of BIF mandated for MAI founded in Led to greater in 2017; and capital raising 2015, followed focus on Agri- founding and agricultural by Australia and science within investor in acquisition New Zealand Milltrust and Roslin advice between farmland funds MAI Technologies 2011-2015 Recognition of wider opportunity to invest in science and technology - British Innovation Fund created to pursue these opportunities 10 STRATEGY “The high number of research universities in the UK means it has a long history of scientific discoveries that have become commercial successes.” - Financial Times, 16 February 2020 11 STRATEGY INVESTMENT UNIVERSE Scottish Universities UK University Clusters Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow, St Andrews & Stirling N8 Research Partnership Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Midlands Innovation Liverpool, Manchester, SETsquared Partnership Newcastle, Sheffield and York Aston, Birmingham, Cranfield, Golden Triangle Keele, Leicester, Loughborough, Nottingham and Warwick Bath, Bristol, Exeter, Southampton and Surrey Universities located in the cities of Cambridge, London and Powered by Bing Oxford© GeoNames, HERE, MSFT 12 STRATEGY KEY SECTORS Agricultural Technologies Deep Tech Biotechnology Life Sciences Nano-Technology Alternative Protein 13 STRATEGY PRIMARY ALIGNMENT TO THE UN SDGS 14 STRATEGY INVESTMENT PROCESS ORIGINATION Incubators and University University investment Investor network of angels Commercialisation networks and VCs Companies (“UCCs”) 15 STRATEGY INVESTMENT PROCESS RESEARCH AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT Characteristics: Targeted investment Due Diligence: rounds: Seed; Series A & B Research Output: Company visits, Identification of investment research reports and Target IRR of 20%, case, valuations, and risks. proprietary models. including dividend payments from portfolio companies and significant Impact Assessment capital appreciation and alignment with UN Sustainable Exit strategy: 5-8 years via Development Goals trade sale; sale to private equity; or IPO 16 STRATEGY INVESTMENT PROCESS PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Investment Proposals: Portfolio and Risk Investment proposals and Management: Quarterly Investment due diligence reports are Carried out on an Advisory Committee submitted to the ongoing basis by the (IAC) Meetings: investment manager for investment manager and BIF Funding Post- Presentation by short- further review, in formally reviewed during Initial Investment: listed companies to the consultation with the the fund’s quarterly Either supported by IAC’s industry AIFM and the fund’s Board meetings the BIF and / or specialists and other Board of Directors, marketed to our participating advisers. allowing numerous network of similar VC All investment checks and balances investors proposals require final throughout the sign-off by the IAC investment process 17 INVESTMENTS “Venture capital funding for UK tech firms reached £10.1bn in 2019, rising 44 per cent year on year and breaking the all-time high set two years earlier.” - City A.M., 15 January 2020 18 INVESTMENTS BIF PORTFOLIO Top 10 Holdings 1 Direct Investments Performance to Date3 #1 Attomarker UCCs and Incubators: 125 #2 Pragmatic Printing 5 business 120 #3 Evox Therapeutics2 units #4 2 115 Osler Diagnostics 78 spin- 2 #5 Oxford Nanoimaging outs 110 #6 Vaccitech2 Spin-outs: 105 #7 Diffblue2 100 #8 Ultromics2 #9 YASA Motors2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Analysis
    The UK’s research and innovation infrastructure: Landscape Analysis 3 Contents Executive summary 6 Chapter 1: Introduction 8 1.1 Scope and definition of research and innovation infrastructure 9 1.2 Infrastructure diversity 10 1.3 Scale and coverage 11 1.4 Questionnaire methodology, limitations and potential bias 13 Chapter 2: Overview of the landscape 15 2.1 The cross-disciplinary nature of infrastructures 17 2.2 Large scale multi-sector facilities 18 Chapter 3: Lifecycle 21 3.1 Concept 22 3.2 Current lifecycle landscape 23 3.3 Evolution of the landscape 26 3.4 Lifecycle and planning 26 Chapter 4: International collaboration and cooperation 28 4.1 International collaboration 29 4.2. Staffing 29 4.3 International user base 30 Chapter 5: Skills and staffing 32 5.1 Numbers 33 5.2 Roles 36 5.3 Staff diversity 36 Chapter 6: Operations 38 6.1 Set-up capital costs 39 6.2 Sources of funding 41 6.3 Primary funding source 42 Chapter 7: Measuring usage and capacity 43 7.1 Usage 44 7.2 Measuring capacity 45 7.3 Managing capacity 47 7.4 Barriers to performance 49 Chapter 8: Links to the economy 52 8.1 Working with businesses 53 Chapter 9: Biological sciences, health and food sector 56 9.1 Current landscape 57 9.2 Interdependency with e-infrastructure 63 9.3 Engagement with the wider economy 63 4 Chapter 10: Physical sciences and engineering sector 65 10.1 The current landscape 67 10.2 Characterising the sector 69 10.3 The importance of international collaboration 71 10.4 Impacts 71 Chapter 11: Social sciences, arts and humanities sector 73 11.1 Form
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Newcastle University Economic Impact Report
    ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT Our economic impact Engagement Our and partnerships Students International Knowledge profile economy Business Research and engagement innovation Excellence with a Purpose CONTENTS Overview 1 Foreword 2 Our economic impact 5 Our students 6 Knowledge economy 8 Research and innovation 9 Business engagement 10 International profile 12 Engagement and partnerships 14 Case studies: 1: Rural sustainability 16 2: City futures 17 3: Employer engagement 18 4: Partnering with business 19 5: Showcasing creativity 20 The Economic Impact 1 of Newcastle University OVERVIEW Newcastle University was formally established in 1963, but can trace its roots to the School of Medicine and Surgery, which was founded in Newcastle upon Tyne in 1834. Today’s University is a thriving international community of 27,750 students and 5,780 staff, the majority of whom are based on our main city-centre campus and other sites around the city. In recent years, we have expanded our footprint to include two international campuses, in Malaysia and Singapore, which opened in 2011 and 2008 respectively, while our newest branch campus, Newcastle University London, opened in September 2015. The University is a member of the internationally renowned Russell Group, an association of 24 leading research-intensive universities in the UK, and of the N8 Research Partnership, which features the eight research-intensive universities in the North of England. We are ranked among the top 1% of world universities, according to the QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) World Rankings. In 2016, Newcastle became one of only 16 universities in the world, and one of two in the UK, to achieve Five Plus QS Stars in the first international assessment of its kind.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 N8/Yorkshire Universities Joint Response to David
    N8/YORKSHIRE UNIVERSITIES JOINT RESPONSE TO DAVID SWEENEY The N8 Research Partnership and Yorkshire Universities (YU) together represent 17 higher education institutions (HEIs) in the north of England. Our members make major contributions towards the UK’s research and innovation base. They are also critical institutions in supporting local and regional development, and act as key anchor institutions underpinning place-making in many cities, towns and communities across the north. We welcome the questions posed by David Sweeney, Executive Chair of Research England, in his recent blog for WonkHE1. This joint response by N8 and YU represents a contribution to the important debate about the role of place in research and innovation policy, strategy and funding in the UK. Executive Summary: • Research capacity and funding is not sufficiently spatially distributed in the UK. This reinforces imbalances and inequalities in the UK economy, and is an opportunity cost for UK Productivity and R&D targets. • In order to address this, there needs to be a greater emphasis on place and developing regional R&I ecosystems, which engage partners in the public and private sectors, as well as local citizens; • Definitions of excellence should be reviewed reflecting value of collaborative research which is locally embedded and impactful. Conventional peer review methods, which are accustomed to traditional measures of excellence, may need to be reviewed for funding schemes for which other factors are also strategically important; • Programmes should not be one-size fits all, but informed by regional knowledge. The approach should be flexible and long-term; • To make transformational change, SIPF awards could usefully be significantly larger and longer in duration; • Building capacity and local knowledge could be supported by developing new place-based collaborative research models, disseminating knowledge and informing policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Improving Academic-Policy Engagement
    July 2019 Understanding and Navigating the Landscape of Evidence-based Policy Recommendations for Improving Academic-policy Engagement Lindsay Walker, Lindsey Pike, Chris Chambers, Natalia Lawrence, Marsha Wood and Hannah Durrant The University of Bath Institute for Policy Research (IPR) is a leading institute of public policy research in the UK. We undertake and enable policy relevant research to make an impact, especially through building links with the worlds of policy and practice as well as by increasing public understanding of policy research through our public events and publications series. We deliver activities for policymakers, researchers and practitioners to enable two-way learning and original contributions to both research and practice, delivered through our Policy Fellowship Programme, Professional Doctorate, Masters in Public Policy, run in collaboration with our Department of Social and Policy Sciences, and Visiting Fellows and Visiting Policy Fellows Schemes. www.bath.ac.uk/ipr PolicyBristol aims to enhance the influence and impact of research from across the University of Bristol on policy and practice at the local, national and international level. We build connections between academics and policymakers through our Fellowship scheme, academic funding support scheme, and by supporting high quality events to stimulate knowledge exchange and reciprocal benefit. Our growing team draws on the evidence base to inform our activities, to ensure that University of Bristol research benefits society and supports evidence-informed policymaking. To find out more about our work, please visit www.bristol.ac.uk/policybristol/ Understanding and Navigating the Landscape of Evidence- based Policy Recommendations for Improving Academic-policy Engagement This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the ERC Consolidator Grant awarded to Professor Chris Chambers (grant agreement No 647893).
    [Show full text]
  • A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands
    A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands June 2017 A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Contents Foreword 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Economic and research landscape .................................................................................... 4 3. The West Midlands SIA Framework ................................................................................. 15 4. Innovation Ecosystem ....................................................................................................... 18 5. Enabling Competencies .................................................................................................... 38 6. Market Strengths ................................................................................................................ 49 7. Key findings and moving forward .................................................................................... 73 Annex A: Case Studies ........................................................................................................ A-1 www.sqw.co.uk A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Foreword In a year of change and challenge on other fronts, this last year has also been one of quiet revolution. This year has seen a dramatic increase across the UK in the profile of science and innovation as a key driver of productivity and its potential to improve the way our public services are delivered. The potential has always
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Isolation and Progression to Higher Education
    The influence of place: Geographical isolation and progression to higher education February 2019 A powerful urban-rural divide, as much as a regional one between north and south, is marked in terms of the way urban centres operate as foci of cultural capital and social capital.1 There is a stark contrast between the widening participation and outreach activities (both university and third-sector provided) that exist in London and what is present in culturally and economically deprived communities in peripheral areas. London has an infrastructure for widening participation and outreach on a scale which simply does not exist in more peripheral parts of the country. Student mobility on entry to university occurs against a backdrop of highly unequal access to cultural enrichment and outreach for students post-16.2 The combination of poor transport links and lack of local higher education provision can mean that moving away from home is the only option for young people living in some rural communities. This appears to be a barrier for some. The higher costs and the added risks involved in studying away from home make this option less appealing to some young people and those who are less confident that higher education is right for them.3 The moralistic coupling of education and leaving generates a discourse of schooled salvation that, as usual, elevates the already privileged.4 1 Mike Savage. (2015) Social Class in the 21st Century, London: Penguin, p. 296. 2 Michael Donnelly and Sol Gamsu. (2018) ‘Home and Away: Social, ethnic, and spatial inequalities in student mobility’, The Sutton Trust, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing to One's Strengths
    ISSUE 29 Quarterly Journal - December 2018 NEWS COMMENT and ANALYSIS on SPINOUTS from UK HEIs Playing to one’s strengths As we have frequently remarked, and as the figures given in our Quarterly Journals demonstrate, spinout activity—new spinouts created, investment, exits - is highly concentrated in the South East of England. While universities such as Oxford and Cambridge, Imperial and UCL, go from strength to strength, making the most of their favourable environment - business, technology, investment - outside the ‘golden triangle’ it is not possible for universities to replicate the same conditions, and they must identify their own strengths and put them to maximum effect. We have two examples in this issue: Univeresity of Birmingham Enterprise’s account of the commercialisation collaboration between eight Midlands universities (p17), and our Spotlight feature on Swansea University (p15), which has evolved a technology transfer model tailored specifically to its own circumstances. Encouragingly, the Knowledge Exchange Framework (KEF) currently under development acknowledges this issue, and has set out to group universities in clusters, so that universities in the most favoured environments can be assessed against their peers, and others judged by criteria more relevant to their own environments; see our report on p13. Since the publication of our previous Quarterly Journal, the sale of Spinouts UK to Beauhurst has been completed. Henry Whorwood of Beauhurst explains what this means in terms of tracking and profiling spinout companies on p8. There will be a transitional handover period, with Spinouts UK founder and editor Jonathan Harris continuing to produce the Quarterly Journals, while Beauhurst gradually takes over the data collection activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of the Scottish Funding Council's Research
    Independent Review of the Scottish Funding Council’s Research Pooling Initiative Chaired by Professor Louise Heathwaite CBE FRSE Contents page Preface Executive summary 1. Introduction 2. The review process 3. Brief background to the Research Pooling Initiative 4. The evidence base 5. Evidence analysis 6. Conclusions and recommendations 7. List of advisory panel members 8. Appendices 2 Preface by Professor Louise Heathwaite CBE FRSE I was delighted to be asked by Mike Cantlay OBE (Chair of the Scottish Funding Council, SFC) and Professor Lesley Yellowlees CBE (Chair of SFC’s Research and Knowledge Exchange Committee, RKEC) to lead this independent review of the Research Pooling Initiative (RPI). Scotland’s major investment in, and long-term commitment to growing critical mass and driving collaboration across its core science disciplines was prescient and has been copied widely elsewhere. Since 2005, SFC has invested over £155m in eleven research pools, matched by over £330m from Scottish Universities and co-funding of almost £10m from the Office for Science & Technology and the Chief Scientist’s Office. Given the continued evolution of the research landscape in Scotland and the UK, now is a good time to evaluate whether the concept of research pooling remains fit for purpose. My remit was to undertake a high-level and summative analysis to establish the impact of SFC's investment in the pooling initiative on the Scottish research environment to date and to provide recommendations on the development of this and SFC’s future investment in research. I am hugely grateful to every member of my Advisory Panel for their valuable guidance and critical insight throughout the review process and particularly for their fortitude and good humour during the oral evidence sessions when the days were very long indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine
    A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report 01 November 2016 A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report Contents Midlands Engine SIA – the headlines ....................................................................................1 1. Introduction to the Midlands Engine SIA...........................................................................4 2. SIA ‘hypotheses’ and ‘framework’ ...................................................................................10 3. Regional science and innovation assets and excellence..............................................19 4. Innovation strengths and our growth priorities..............................................................30 5. Market and technology drivers of change.......................................................................53 6. Innovation networks and behaviours ..............................................................................59 7. Next Steps – unlocking our productivity potential.........................................................67 A Science and Innovation Audit Report for the Midlands Engine, sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Volume 1: Main Report Midlands Engine SIA – the headlines 1. In Autumn 2015 the UK Government announced regional Science and Innovation Audits (SIAs) to catalyse
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for 2018-19
    Yorkshire Universities 2018-19 Annual Report and Accounts yorkshireuniversities.ac.uk YorkshireUnis Reference and administrative details for the year ended 31 July 2019 Registered office: 22 Clarendon Place, Leeds, LS2 9JY Registered company number: 03467035 Registered charity number: 1109200 Independent examiner: Mark Heaton FCCA DChA KM Chartered Accountants 1st Floor Block C The Wharf Manchester Road Burnley Lancashire BB11 1JG Bankers: Unity Trust Bank plc Nine Brindley Place Birmingham West Midlands B1 2HB Cambridge & Counties Bank Charnwood Court 5B New Walk Leicester LE1 6TE Manchester Building Society 125 Portland Street Manchester M1 4QD CONTENTS Chair’s foreword .................................................................................................................... 1 Statement of trustees’ responsibilities ................................................................................... 2 Governance, structure and risk management ........................................................................ 3 Mission ................................................................................................................................. 5 Objectives and achievements ............................................................................................... 5 Future plans ........................................................................................................................ 10 Financial review .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thebrazennose2004.Pdf
    The Brazen Nose 2003 2 THE BRAZEN NOSE Brasenose Society The object of the Society shall be the advancement of the welfare and interests of Brasenose College by: (i) encouraging closer relations between past and present members of the College and fostering interests which they have in common; (ii) keeping members of the Society informed of events in the College; (iii) any other methods which from time to time appear likely to achieve the Society's object. [Revised 1999] ★ The Brasenose College Charitable Foundation USA William W. Sterling [1961] is President of the BNC Charitable Foundation. His address is: 1821 Shoreline Highway Sausalito, CA 94965, USA. Members of the College resident in the USA are urged to keep him informed of their addresses. ★ Please note that details and application forms for all Brasenose Society events in 2004 will be found in the back pages of this issue. 3 Contents Brasenose College...........................................................4 Editors’ Notes................................................................. 9 College Records 2003: ...................................................13 Class Lists College Prizes and University Prizes Award Holders Matriculations Blues and Half Blues Articles........................................................................... 29 Reports............................................................................62 News and Notes..............................................................85 Death and Obituary Notices..........................................95
    [Show full text]
  • UKRI Open Access Policy: Summary of Stakeholder Workshops and Consultation Meetings
    UKRI Open Access Policy: Summary of stakeholder workshops and consultation meetings Contents: 1. UK Research and Innovation Open Access Review Universities Stakeholder Roundtable – Meeting Note..................................................................................................................................2 2. UKRI Open Access Review Stakeholder Roundtable Libraries, Research Management and Knowledge Exchange – Meeting Note..........................................................................................12 3. UK Research and Innovation Open Access Review Stakeholder Academies and Learned Societies Roundtable – Meeting Note...........................................................................................21 4. UKRI Open Access Review Stakeholder Roundtable Publishers Association – Meeting Note....32 5. UKRI Open Access Review International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers Stakeholder Roundtable – Meeting Note....................................................................41 6. UKRI Open Access Review Stakeholder Roundtable Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) – Meeting Note...........................................................................................50 7. UKRI Open Access Review Licensing and Copyright Retention Workshop – Meeting Note........59 8. UKRI Open Access Review Metadata Workshop - Meeting Note................................................78 9. UKRI Open Access Review Researcher Workshop – Meeting Note...........................................93
    [Show full text]