Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: Research Challenges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Ad Hoc Networks 3 (2005) 257–279 www.elsevier.com/locate/adhoc Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges Ian F. Akyildiz *, Dario Pompili, Tommaso Melodia Broadband and Wireless Networking Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA Received 15 July 2004; received in revised form 20 September 2004; accepted 21 January 2005 Available online 2 February 2005 Abstract Underwater sensor nodes will find applications in oceanographic data collection, pollution monitoring, offshore exploration, disaster prevention, assisted navigation and tactical surveillance applications. Moreover, unmanned or autonomous underwater vehicles (UUVs, AUVs), equipped with sensors, will enable the exploration of natural under- sea resources and gathering of scientific data in collaborative monitoring missions. Underwater acoustic networking is the enabling technology for these applications. Underwater networks consist of a variable number of sensors and vehi- cles that are deployed to perform collaborative monitoring tasks over a given area. In this paper, several fundamental key aspects of underwater acoustic communications are investigated. Different archi- tectures for two-dimensional and three-dimensional underwater sensor networks are discussed, and the characteristics of the underwater channel are detailed. The main challenges for the development of efficient networking solutions posed by the underwater environment are detailed and a cross-layer approach to the integration of all communication functionalities is suggested. Furthermore, open research issues are discussed and possible solution approaches are outlined. Ó 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. Keywords: Underwater acoustic sensor networks; Underwater networking; Acoustic communications 1. Introduction lection, pollution monitoring, offshore explora- tion, disaster prevention, assisted navigation Underwater sensor networks are envisioned to and tactical surveillance applications. Multiple enable applications for oceanographic data col- unmanned or autonomous underwater vehicles (UUVs, AUVs), equipped with underwater sen- sors, will also find application in exploration * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 404 894 5141; fax: +1 404 of natural undersea resources and gathering of 894 7883. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (I.F. Akyildiz), dar- scientific data in collaborative monitoring mis- [email protected] (D. Pompili), [email protected] (T. sions. To make these applications viable, there Melodia). is a need to enable underwater communications 1570-8705/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.004 258 I.F. Akyildiz et al. / Ad Hoc Networks 3 (2005) 257–279 among underwater devices. Underwater sensor ture gradients (thermoclines), which are consid- nodes and vehicles must possess self-configura- ered to be a breeding ground for certain marine tion capabilities, i.e., they must be able to micro-organisms. coordinate their operation by exchanging config- • Undersea explorations. Underwater sensor net- uration, location and movement information, works can help detecting underwater oilfields and to relay monitored data to an onshore or reservoirs, determine routes for laying under- station. sea cables, and assist in exploration for valuable Wireless underwater acoustic networking is the minerals. enabling technology for these applications. Under- • Disaster prevention. Sensor networks that mea- Water Acoustic Sensor Networks (UW-ASNs) sure seismic activity from remote locations can consist of a variable number of sensors and provide tsunami warnings to coastal areas [42], vehicles that are deployed to perform collaborative or study the effects of submarine earthquakes monitoring tasks over a given area. To achieve (seaquakes). this objective, sensors and vehicles self-organize • Assisted navigation. Sensors can be used to iden- in an autonomous network which can tify hazards on the seabed, locate dangerous adapt to the characteristics of the ocean environ- rocks or shoals in shallow waters, mooring posi- ment [1]. tions, submerged wrecks, and to perform The above described features enable a broad bathymetry profiling. range of applications for underwater acoustic sen- • Distributed tactical surveillance. AUVs and sor networks: fixed underwater sensors can collaboratively monitor areas for surveillance, reconnaissance, • Ocean sampling networks. Networks of sensors targeting and intrusion detection systems. For and AUVs, such as the Odyssey-class AUVs example, in [15], a 3D underwater sensor net- [2], can perform synoptic, cooperative adaptive work is designed for a tactical surveillance sampling of the 3D coastal ocean environment system that is able to detect and classify subma- [3]. Experiments such as the Monterey Bay rines, small delivery vehicles (SDVs) and divers field experiment [4] demonstrated the advanta- based on the sensed data from mechanical, ges of bringing together sophisticated new radiation, magnetic and acoustic microsensors. robotic vehicles with advanced ocean models With respect to traditional radar/sonar sys- to improve the ability to observe and pre- tems, underwater sensor networks can reach a dict the characteristics of the oceanic envi- higher accuracy, and enable detection and ronment. classification of low signature targets by also • Environmental monitoring. UW-ASNs can per- combining measures from different types of form pollution monitoring (chemical, biologi- sensors. cal and nuclear). For example, it may be • Mine reconnaissance. The simultaneous opera- possible to detail the chemical slurry of antibi- tion of multiple AUVs with acoustic and opti- otics, estrogen-type hormones and insecticides cal sensors can be used to perform rapid to monitor streams, rivers, lakes and ocean environmental assessment and detect mine-like bays (water quality in situ analysis) [51]. Moni- objects. toring of ocean currents and winds, improved weather forecast, detecting climate change, Underwater networking is a rather unexplored under-standing and predicting the effect of area although underwater communications have human activities on marine ecosystems, biolog- been experimented since World War II, when, in ical monitoring such as tracking of fishes or 1945, an underwater telephone was developed in micro-organisms, are other possible applica- the United States to communicate with submarines tions. For example, in [52], the design and con- [39]. Acoustic communications are the typical struction of a simple underwater sensor physical layer technology in underwater networks. network is described to detect extreme tempera- In fact, radio waves propagate at long distances I.F. Akyildiz et al. / Ad Hoc Networks 3 (2005) 257–279 259 through conductive sea water only at extra low fre- selected ocean areas, remote configuration and quencies (30–300 Hz), which require large anten- interaction with onshore human operators. This nae and high transmission power. For example, can be obtained by connecting underwater instru- the Berkeley Mica 2 Motes, the most popular ments by means of wireless links based on acoustic experimental platform in the sensor networking communication. community, have been reported to have a trans- Many researchers are currently engaged in mission range of 120 cm in underwater at developing networking solutions for terrestrial 433 MHz by experiments performed at the Ro- wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. Although botic Embedded Systems Laboratory (RESL) at there exist many recently developed network pro- the University of Southern California. Optical tocols for wireless sensor networks, the unique waves do not suffer from such high attenuation characteristics of the underwater acoustic commu- but are affected by scattering. Moreover, transmis- nication channel, such as limited bandwidth sion of optical signals requires high precision in capacity and variable delays [38], require very effi- pointing the narrow laser beams. Thus, links in cient and reliable new data communication underwater networks are based on acoustic wire- protocols. less communications [45]. Major challenges in the design of underwater The traditional approach for ocean-bottom or acoustic networks are: ocean-column monitoring is to deploy underwater sensors that record data during the monitoring • The available bandwidth is severely limited; mission, and then recover the instruments [37]. • The underwater channel is severely im- This approach has the following disadvantages: paired, especially due to multi-path and fad- ing; • No real-time monitoring. The recorded data can- • Propagation delay in underwater is five orders not be accessed until the instruments are recov- of magnitude higher than in radio frequency ered, which may happen several months after (RF) terrestrial channels, and extremely the beginning of the monitoring mission. This variable; is critical especially in surveillance or in envi- • High bit error rates and temporary losses of ronmental monitoring applications such as seis- connectivity (shadow zones) can be experienced, mic monitoring. due to the extreme characteristics of the under- • No on-line system reconfiguration. Interaction water channel; between onshore control systems and the mon- • Battery power is limited and usually batteries itoring instruments is not possible. This cannot be recharged, also because solar energy impedes any adaptive tuning of the instruments, cannot be exploited; nor is it possible to reconfigure the system after • Underwater sensors
Recommended publications
  • Undersea Park America's First

    Undersea Park America's First

    KEY LARGO CORAL REEF America's First i~jl Undersea Park By CHARLES M. BROOKFIELD Photographs by JERRY GREENBERG ,I, ,.;;!' MO ST within sight of the oceanside ~Ii palaces of Miami Beach, a pencil-thin il- Achain of islands begins its 221-mile sweep southwest to the Dry Tortugas. Just offshore, paralleling the scimitar plor%E 6 II curve of these Florida Keys, lies an under­ qy-q sea rampart of exquisite beauty-a living coral reef, the only one of its kind in United States continental waters. Brilliant tropical ~". fish dart about its multicolored coral gardens. Part of the magnificent reef, a segment rough­ ly 21 nautical miles long by 4 wide, off Key Largo, has been .dedicated as America's first undersea park. I know this reef intimately. For more than 30 years I have sailed its warm, clear waters and probed its shifting sands and bizarre for­ mations in quest of sunken ships and their treasure of artifacts. ',." Snorkel diver (opposite, right) glides above brain coral into a fantastic underseascape of elkhorn and staghom in the new preserve off Key Largo, Florida 1~¥~-4 - ce il\ln ·ii Here is a graveyard of countless brave sail­ uncover this interesting fact until two 'years 'ti: ing ships, Spanish galleons, English men-ot­ ago, when I learned that the Willche~lel"s ~j~ war, pirate vessels, and privateers foundered log had been saved. Writing to the Public h~l on the reefs hidden fangs. In the 19th century Record Office in London, I obtained photo­ alone, several hundred vessels met death static-copies of the last few pages.
  • Accuracy Assessment of Underwater Photogrammetric Three Dimensional Modelling for Coral Reefs

    Accuracy Assessment of Underwater Photogrammetric Three Dimensional Modelling for Coral Reefs

    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B5, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAMMETRIC THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELLING FOR CORAL REEFS T. Guo a, *, A. Capra b, M. Troyer a, A. Gruen a, A. J. Brooks c, J. L. Hench d, R. J. Schmittc, S. J. Holbrook c, M. Dubbini e a Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland - (taguo, troyer)@phys.ethz.ch, [email protected] b Dept. of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari”, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Pietro Vivarelli 10/1, 41125 Modena, Italy – [email protected] c Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara. Santa Barbara, California 93106-6150, USA – [email protected], (schmitt, holbrook)@lifesci.ucsb.edu d Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC, USA - [email protected] e Dept. of History Culture Civilization – Headquarters of Geography, University of Bologna, via Guerrazzi 20, 40125 Bologna, Italy [email protected] Commission V, WG V/5 KEY WORDS: Photogrammetry, Underwater 3D Modelling, Accuracy Assessment, Calibration, Point Clouds, Coral Reefs, Coral Growth, Moorea ABSTRACT: Recent advances in automation of photogrammetric 3D modelling software packages have stimulated interest in reconstructing highly accurate 3D object geometry in unconventional environments such as underwater utilizing simple and low-cost camera systems. The accuracy of underwater 3D modelling is affected by more parameters than in single media cases. This study is part of a larger project on 3D measurements of temporal change of coral cover in tropical waters.
  • Ecological and Socio-Economic Impacts of Dive

    Ecological and Socio-Economic Impacts of Dive

    ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF DIVE AND SNORKEL TOURISM IN ST. LUCIA, WEST INDIES Nola H. L. Barker Thesis submittedfor the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science Environment Department University of York August 2003 Abstract Coral reefsprovide many servicesand are a valuableresource, particularly for tourism, yet they are suffering significant degradationand pollution worldwide. To managereef tourism effectively a greaterunderstanding is neededof reef ecological processesand the impactsthat tourist activities haveon them. This study explores the impact of divers and snorkelerson the reefs of St. Lucia, West Indies, and how the reef environmentaffects tourists' perceptionsand experiencesof them. Observationsof divers and snorkelersrevealed that their impact on the reefs followed certainpatterns and could be predictedfrom individuals', site and dive characteristics.Camera use, night diving and shorediving were correlatedwith higher levels of diver damage.Briefings by dive leadersalone did not reducetourist contactswith the reef but interventiondid. Interviewswith tourists revealedthat many choseto visit St. Lucia becauseof its marineprotected area. Certain site attributes,especially marine life, affectedtourists' experiencesand overall enjoyment of reefs.Tourists were not alwaysable to correctly ascertainabundance of marine life or sedimentpollution but they were sensitiveto, and disliked seeingdamaged coral, poor underwatervisibility, garbageand other tourists damagingthe reef. Some tourists found sitesto be
  • Overview of the Impacts of Anthropogenic Underwater Sound in the Marine Environment

    Overview of the Impacts of Anthropogenic Underwater Sound in the Marine Environment

    Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment Biodiversity Series 2009 Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the signature à la réunion ministérielle des former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, on 22 September 1992. The Convention à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, and approved by the European Community le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne and Spain. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. 2 OSPAR Commission, 2009 Acknowledgements Author list (in alphabetical order) Thomas Götz Scottish Oceans Institute, East Sands University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB [email protected] Module 2, 8 Gordon Hastie SMRU Limited New Technology Centre North Haugh St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SR [email protected] Module 2, 8 Leila T.
  • Full Document (Pdf 2154

    Full Document (Pdf 2154

    White Paper Research Project T1803, Task 35 Overwater Whitepaper OVERWATER STRUCTURES: MARINE ISSUES by Barbara Nightingale Charles A. Simenstad Research Assistant Senior Fisheries Biologist School of Marine Affairs School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 University District Building 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Patricia Lynch Regulatory and Compliance Program Manager, Environmental Affairs Prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration May 2001 WHITE PAPER Overwater Structures: Marine Issues Submitted to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation Prepared by Barbara Nightingale and Charles Simenstad University of Washington Wetland Ecosystem Team School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences May 9, 2001 Note: Some pages in this document have been purposefully skipped or blank pages inserted so that this document will copy correctly when duplexed. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 508.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Overwater Structures: Marine Issues May 2001 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Barbara Nightingale, Charles Simenstad 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. University District Building; 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Agreement T1803, Task 35 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 12.
  • Review of Human Physiology in the Underwater Environment

    Review of Human Physiology in the Underwater Environment

    Available online at www.ijmrhs.com cal R edi ese M ar of c l h a & n r H u e o a J l l t h International Journal of Medical Research & a S n ISSN No: 2319-5886 o c i t i Health Sciences, 2019, 8(8): 117-121 e a n n c r e e t s n I • • IJ M R H S Review of Human Physiology in the Underwater Environment Oktiyas Muzaky Luthfi1,2* 1 Marine Science University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia 2 Fisheries Diving School, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia *Corresponding e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Since before centuries, human tries hard to explore underwater and in 1940’s human-introduced an important and revolutionary gear i.e. scuba that allowed human-made long interaction in the underwater world. Since diving using pressure gas under pressure environment, it should be considered to remember gas law (Boyle’s law). The gas law gives a clear understanding of physiological consequences related to diving diseases such as barotrauma or condition in which tissue or organ is damage due to gas pressure. The organ which has direct effect related to compression and expansion of gas were lungs, ear, and sinus. These organs were common and potentially fatigue injury for a diver. In this article we shall review the history of scuba diving, physical stress caused underwater environment, physiology adaptation of lung, ear, and sinus, and diving disease. Keywords: Barotrauma, Boyle’s law, Scuba, Barine, Physical stress INTRODUCTION The underwater world is a place where many people dream to explore it.
  • 10 Ways Divers Can Help

    10 Ways Divers Can Help

    iver n Ways a D Can Protect Te the Underwater Environment 1. Dive carefully to protect fragile aquatic ecosystems 6. Be an ecotourist Many aquatic organisms are delicate and can be harmed by Make informed decisions when selecting a destination and the bump of a camera, the swipe of a fin or even the gentle choose Project AWARE Environmental Operators or other touch of a hand. Some aquatic organisms like corals grow facilities dedicated to sustainable business practices. Obey very slowly and breaking even a small piece can destroy all local laws and regulations and understand your effect on decades of growth. By being careful you can prevent long- the environment. Don’t collect souvenirs like corals or shells. term damage to magnificent dive sites. Instead, take underwater photos and follow Project AWARE’s 10 Tips for Underwater Photographers. 2. Be aware of your body and equipment placement when diving 7. Respect underwater cultural heritage Keep your gauges and alternate air source secured so they Divers are privileged to access dive sites that are part of our don’t drag over the reef or other vital habitat. Control your cultural heritage and maritime history. Wrecks can also serve buoyancy, taking care not to touch fragile organisms with as important habitats for fish and other aquatic life. Help your body or equipment. You can do your part and prevent preserve these sites for future generations by obeying local injury to aquatic life every time you dive. laws, diving responsibly and treating wrecks with respect. 3. Keep your dive skills sharp 8.
  • Researching the Great Barrier Reef Supporting Virtual Reef Diver, Supports Monitoring Our Reefs! Virtual Reef Diver

    Researching the Great Barrier Reef Supporting Virtual Reef Diver, Supports Monitoring Our Reefs! Virtual Reef Diver

    SUPPORTING VIRTUAL REEF DIVER, SUPPORTS MONITORING OUR REEFS! The more images we have of the reef and the more people who classify each of these images, the more information can be extracted from the data during the modelling process. RESEARCHING THE GREAT BARRIER REEF The Great Barrier Reef was designated a World Heritage Area in 1981 and is the largest coral reef ecosystem on earth, with over 2,900 coral reefs spread over approximately 348,000 km2. This biologically diverse underwater environment supports over 1,500 fish and 600 coral species, alongside thousands of molluscs, marine ma mals, sea turtles and birds. An enormous amount of effort is invested in monitoring the Great Barrier Reef, with dozens of publicly and privately funded monitoring programs in place, run by research institutions, government agencies, reef-based industries, citizen-science groups, and traditional owners. However, no single organisation can monitor the entire Great Barrier Reef on its own. The motivation for the Virtual Reef Diver project was to find a way to make use of all the existing monitoring data VIRTUAL REEF DIVER collected by these organisations, and to look for other innovative ways to obtain new data in a cost-effective manner. Institute for Future Environments QUT Gardens Point Campus 2 George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia +61 412 160 067 [email protected] www.virtualreef.org.au WWW.VIRTUALREEF.ORG.AU Monitorning the Great Barrier Reef © 2018. Produced by Virtual Reef Diver. Queensland University of Technology Photos: Trevor Smith, Terry through education, outreach, and Cummins and Virtual Reef Diver. monitoring.
  • Survey of Temperature Variation Effect on Underwater Acoustic Wireless Transmission Ghada ZAÏBI*, Nejah NASRI*, Abdennaceur KACHOURI* and Mounir SAMET *

    Survey of Temperature Variation Effect on Underwater Acoustic Wireless Transmission Ghada ZAÏBI*, Nejah NASRI*, Abdennaceur KACHOURI* and Mounir SAMET *

    SETIT 2009 5th International Conference: Sciences of Electronic, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications March 22-26, 2009 – TUNISIA Survey Of Temperature Variation Effect On Underwater Acoustic Wireless Transmission Ghada ZAÏBI*, Nejah NASRI*, Abdennaceur KACHOURI* and Mounir SAMET * * Laboratory of Electronics and Technologies of Information (LETI) National School of Engineers of Sfax B.P.W, 3038 Sfax, Tunisia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: In acoustic channel it is known that low available bandwidth, highly varying multipath, large propagation delays, noise and physical channel properties variation, in addition to the power consumption restrict the efficiency of underwater wireless acoustic systems. The physical characteristics of Mediterranean channel such as depth, salinity and especially temperature influence the acoustic signal attenuation, the SNR level, error ratio and the signal bandwidth. It seems to be crucial to introduce these parameters in the underwater channel model of the underwater wireless communication network. The goal of this paper is to highlight the impact of the temperature variation at shallow sea on the acoustic signal attenuation and error ratio and explain the relationship between temperature and SNR as well as the optimal frequency of the transmitted signal. Key words: optimal frequency, SNR, temperature, underwater acoustic channel. as temperature, salinity and depth variation [SOZ 00], [WON 05], [COP 82]. INTRODUCTION This article characterizes the underwater channel In spite of the use of electromagnetic wave, especially and presents its physical characteristics survey as well radio wave in the mobile radio communications, its as its parameters variation effect on the acoustic signal propagation in underwater environment is limited in attenuation.
  • An Upwelling Radiance Distribution Camera System, NURADS

    An Upwelling Radiance Distribution Camera System, NURADS

    An Upwelling Radiance Distribution Camera System, NURADS Kenneth J. Voss and Albert L. Chapin Physics Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fl. 33124 [email protected] Abstract: We have built a new instrument to measure the in-water spectral upwelling radiance distribution. This instrument measures the radiance distribution at six wavelengths and obtains a complete suite of measurements (6 spectral data images with associated dark images) in approximately 2 minutes (in clear water). This instrument is much smaller than previous instruments (0.3 m in diameter and 0.3 m long), decreasing the instrument self-shading. It also has improved performance resulting from enhanced sensor sensitivity and a more subtle lens rolloff effect. We describe the instrument, its characterization, and show data examples from both clear and turbid water. ©2004 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: References and Links 1. Tyler, J.E. 1960. Radiance distribution as a function of depth in an underwater environment. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. 7: 363-41. 2. Aas, E., and N. K. Hojerslev. 1999. Analysis of underwater radiance distribution observations: apparent optical properties and analytical functions describing the angular radiance distributions. J. Geophys. Res. 104: 8015 - 8024. 3. Smith, R. C., R. W. Austin and J. E. Tyler. 1970. An oceanographic radiance distribution camera system. Appl. Opt. 9: 2015-2022. 4. Voss, K. J. 1989. Electro-optic camera system for measurement of the underwater radiance distribution. Optical Engineering. 28: 241-247. 5. Voss, K. J. and A. L. Chapin. 1992. Next generation in-water radiance distribution camera system. Proc. Soc. Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 1759: 384 - 387.
  • Assessment of the Effects of Noise and Vibration from Offshore Wind Farms on Marine Wildlife

    Assessment of the Effects of Noise and Vibration from Offshore Wind Farms on Marine Wildlife

    ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF NOISE AND VIBRATION FROM OFFSHORE WIND FARMS ON MARINE WILDLIFE ETSU W/13/00566/REP DTI/Pub URN 01/1341 Contractor University of Liverpool, Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies Environmental Research and Consultancy Prepared by G Vella, I Rushforth, E Mason, A Hough, R England, P Styles, T Holt, P Thorne The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Sustainable Energy Programmes. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI. First published 2001 i © Crown copyright 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Main objectives of the report Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU), on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) commissioned the Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies (CMACS) in October 2000, to assess the effect of noise and vibration from offshore wind farms on marine wildlife. The key aims being to review relevant studies, reports and other available information, identify any gaps and uncertainties in the current data and make recommendations, with outline methodologies, to address these gaps. Introduction The UK has 40% of Europe ’s total potential wind resource, with mean annual offshore wind speeds, at a reference of 50m above sea level, of between 7m/s and 9m/s. Research undertaken by the British Wind Energy Association suggests that a ‘very good ’ site for development would have a mean annual wind speed of 8.5m/s. The total practicable long-term energy yield for the UK, taking limiting factors into account, would be approximately 100 TWh/year (DTI, 1999).
  • The Drone Revolution of Shark Science: a Review

    The Drone Revolution of Shark Science: a Review

    drones Review The Drone Revolution of Shark Science: A Review Paul A. Butcher 1,2,* , Andrew P. Colefax 3, Robert A. Gorkin III 4 , Stephen M. Kajiura 5 , Naima A. López 6 , Johann Mourier 7 , Cormac R. Purcell 8,9 , Gregory B. Skomal 10, James P. Tucker 2, Andrew J. Walsh 3,8, Jane E. Williamson 11 and Vincent Raoult 12 1 NSW Department of Primary Industries, National Marine Science Centre, P.O. Box 4321, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia 2 School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, National Marine Science Centre, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia; [email protected] 3 Sci-eye, P.O. Box 4202, Goonellabah, NSW 2480, Australia; [email protected] (A.P.C.); [email protected] (A.J.W.) 4 SMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; [email protected] 5 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA; [email protected] 6 Marine Futures Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; [email protected] 7 UMS 3514 Plateforme Marine Stella Mare, Université de Corse Pasquale Paoli, 20620 Biguglia, France; [email protected] 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; [email protected] 9 Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 10 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, 836 South Rodney