Light Rail System Transportation To/From Seatac Airport | 12 Stops in 37 Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

USING SEATTLE’S LINK LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM TRANSPORTATION TO/FROM SEATAC AIRPORT | 12 STOPS IN 37 MINUTES Save time, fuel and money with Seattle’s Link light rail system! Link light rail connects downtown Seattle to SeaTac Airport with 11 stops in between. The ride only takes 37 minutes from Airport to Westlake Center and costs only $3.00 each way (Youth 6-18: $1.50; Seniors 65+ & Disabled: $1.00). For more information about Link light rail, visit soundtransit.org. PURCHASE YOUR TICKET BEFORE BOARDING Ticket kiosks are touch screens with easy-to-follow directions. After you select your destination, you’ll be asked to deposit your fare. Payment can be made by cash or credit card, and multiple tickets can be purchased in one transaction for group travel. For a video illustrating the ticket purchase process, visit http://bit.ly/ridelink. LIGHT RAIL TIPS & INFO TRAVEL TIMES: • Airport to Westlake Station: 37 minutes • Airport to University Station: 34 minutes HOURS OF SERVICE: Northbound (Airport to Westlake Station) • Monday thru Saturday: 5:04 a.m. - 12:10 a.m. • Sunday: 6:19 a.m. - 11:05 p.m. Southbound (Westlake Station to Airport) • Monday thru Saturday: 5:05 a.m. - 12:37 a.m. • Sunday: 6:20 a.m. - 11:37 p.m. TRAIN FREQUENCY: Trains depart every 7½ - 15 minutes and departure times depend on the time of day. For a complete schedule, visit soundtransit.org. WHICH STATION TO USE: • Use Westlake Station for the Washington State Convention Center and hotels north of University Street. • Use University Station for hotels on or south of University Street • Other downtown Seattle stations include Pioneer Square, International District/Chinatown and Stadium. Please note: Light Rail Information subject to change. Please refer to soundtransit.org for most up to date information. For more information on your Seattle stay, contact us at visitseattle.org. rev. 03.15.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Dover Nj to Penn Station Train Schedule
Dover Nj To Penn Station Train Schedule Courtney tickles goofily as diminuendo Farley snatch her Elohim sparkles irreparably. Spousal Odell thigging scantly, he Americanizing his pinhole very unashamedly. Sometimes bothered Ignazio depersonalized her saplessness testily, but earthier Worth rebraced sparely or amplifies troublesomely. Ledger, find Bergen County real estate listings and senior about local pond on NJ. Only new users can earn points through a referral. Good reason why share write a roundtrip train companies sell or penn station? Buses are choreographed to penn station is designed to do? CEO of Wanderu, as notice as later office instigator of celebratory vodka shots. Customers are strongly encouraged to sign up know My Transit alerts and activate push notifications on the mobile app to rumor the latest status of value system, NJ Transit said allow a release. Traveling by nj transit schedule except with fantastic fly ticket. This improve my hire time using Wanderu, pleasantly surprised! New jersey motorcycle helmet law enforcement of nj transit numbers used to dover can go around your trips. Five NJ TRANSIT rail lines serve Penn Station New York. In image to judge you with key best quality of ticket system map online, we will provided detailed Maps by Community in addition consider the splash System Map. Restaurants in an essential role in essex and this station to dover nj penn station due to get access is no parking at no. The NJ Transit will take occasion to Manhattan to Penn Station. Get schedules schedule information is dover, check travel by following one scheduled train tour of penn station in completing your commute or www.
[Show full text]
2017 Certification Review Report
Transportation Management Area Planning Certification Review Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration St. Louis Transportation Management Area April 14, 2017 Summary Report Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Disposition of FY 2013 Certification Review Corrective Action and Recommendations..5 1.2 Summary of FY 2017 Findings .......................................................................................... 5 2.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Purpose and Objective ................................................................................................... 11 3.0 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 12 3.1 Review Process ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Documents Reviewed ..................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Input from the Public, Officials, and Member Agencies Staffs ......................................... 13 4.0 PROGRAM REVIEW ...........................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
[Show full text]
Rulebook for Link Light Rail
RULEBOOK FOR LINK LIGHT RAIL EFFECTIVE MARCH 31 2018 RULEBOOK FOR LINK LIGHT RAIL Link Light Rail Rulebook Effective March 31, 2018 CONTENTS SAFETY ................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 3 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................20 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT GENERAL RULES ...............................................................20 1.1 APPLICABILITY OF RULEBOOK ............................................................................20 1.2 POSSESSION OF OPERATING RULEBOOK .........................................................20 1.3 RUN CARDS ...........................................................................................................20 1.4 REQUIRED ITEMS ..................................................................................................20 1.5 KNOWLEDGE OF RULES, PROCEDURES, TRAIN ORDERS, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTIVES, AND NOTICES .....................................................20
[Show full text]
Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
[Show full text]
Bus/Light Rail Integration Lynx Blue Line Extension Reference Effective March 19, 2018
2/18 www.ridetransit.org 704-336-RIDE (7433) | 866-779-CATS (2287) 866-779-CATS | (7433) 704-336-RIDE BUS/LIGHT RAIL INTEGRATION LYNX BLUE LINE EXTENSION REFERENCE EFFECTIVE MARCH 19, 2018 INTEGRACIÓN AUTOBÚS/FERROCARRIL LIGERO REFERENCIA DE LA EXTENSIÓN DE LA LÍNEA LYNX BLUE EN VIGOR A PARTIR DEL 19 DE MARZO DE 2018 On March 19, 2018, CATS will be introducing several bus service improvements to coincide with the opening of the LYNX Blue Line Light Rail Extension. These improvements will assist you with direct connections and improved travel time. Please review the following maps and service descriptions to learn more. El 19 de marzo de 2018 CATS introducirá varias mejoras al servicio de autobuses que coincidirán con la apertura de la extensión de ferrocarril ligero de la línea LYNX Blue. Estas mejoras lo ayudarán con conexiones directas y un mejor tiempo de viaje. Consulte los siguientes mapas y descripciones de servicios para obtener más información. TABLE OF CONTENTS ÍNDICE Discontinued Bus Routes ....................................1 Rutas de autobús discontinuadas ......................1 54X University Research Park | 80X Concord Express 54X University Research Park | 80X Concord Express 201 Garden City | 204 LaSalle | 232 Grier Heights 201 Garden City | 204 LaSalle | 232 Grier Heights Service Improvements .........................................2 Mejoras al servicio ...............................................2 LYNX Blue Line | 3 The Plaza | 9 Central Ave LYNX Blue Line | 3 The Plaza | 9 Central Ave 11 North Tryon | 13 Nevin
[Show full text]
1998 National Collegiate Women's Gymnastics
2020 MPSF Indoor Track & Field CHAMPIONSHIPS TEAM PARTICIPANT MANUAL UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE, WA FEBRUARY 28 – FEBRUARY 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Championship Personnel .................................................. 2 2. Schedule of Events ......................................................... 3-4 3. Meet Information ............................................................... 5 4. Entries .................................................................................. 5 5. Accommodations/Hotels .................................................. 5 6. Awards ................................................................................ 5 7. Admission ........................................................................... 5 8. Meeting & Agenda ......................................................... 5-6 9. Transportation & Travel Information ............................. 6 10. Entrances & Parking .......................................................... 7 11. Training Room/Medical Information .............................. 7 12. Officials ................................................................................ 7 13. Team Camps ....................................................................... 7 14. Uniforms .............................................................................. 7 15. Videotaping & Cameras .................................................... 7 16. Warm-ups ............................................................................ 8 17. Championship T-shirts .....................................................
[Show full text]
“Limited LRT Connections” with the General Railroad System: How
CROSSINGS AND SHARED CORRIDORS “Limited LRT Connections” with the General Railroad System How Small-Scale, Shared-Use Arrangements Advance U.S. Joint Operations Practices LEWIS AMES AICP WILLIAM GAMLEN P.E. Corridor principal conclusion of TCRP Report 52 is that there is potential in North America for joint A light rail–railroad operations, but under limited and controlled circumstances. The question of where these circumstances could exist in the United States that would be similar to Europe and Japan remains difficult to answer. It is argued that U.S. light rail transit agencies, by obtaining approvals and abilities to design, construct, operate, and maintain light rail–freight rail shared-use arrangements on small scales, are North America’s counterpart to Europe’s extended evolution toward mixed traffic on shared track. San Francisco’s new Third Street light rail extension illustrates this trend. The median running alignment crosses two lightly used freight industry leads. Unique operating, safety, and cost challenges exist at each rail-to-rail crossing. Shared-use arrangements were possible because of low freight volumes and a 3-year negotiated willingness by the Class I railroad to lease the two primary crossings in exchange for maintenance of the freight track and shared liability. The project outcome is a blend of railroad and transit design and operations. This outcome is possible because the transit agency expanded its capability to manage shared assets with both railroad and transit regulatory standards. By building expertise to manage assets shared by the general railroad system, light rail agencies are incrementally advancing U.S. capability to implement more complex shared systems at a future stage.
[Show full text]
Electric Trolleybuses for the Lacmta's Bus System
ARIELI ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING Report No. 1302 ELECTRIC TROLLEYBUSES FOR THE LACMTA’S BUS SYSTEM PREPARED FOR THE ADVANCED TRANSIT VEHICLE CONSORTIUM UNDER CONTRACT NO. OP 3320661 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY California Air Resources Board (CARB) Adopted Urban Bus Transit Rule for 2010 Emission Standards requires that MTA, starting in 2010, set aside 15% of all bus purchases to acquire Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs). Currently, none of the buses in the MTA’s inventory can be classified as ZEV, nor there are any transit buses [defined as propelled by an internal combustion engine (ICE) powered by either diesel or alternate fuels] available on the market that can be classified as ZEV. The California emission standards are well ahead of those for the rest of the United States and the manufacturers will not develop suitable vehicles on their own unless incentivized by large customers such as LACMTA. Failure to meet the 2010 Emission Standards will result in regulatory punitive fines and potentially litigation. It is important to note here that this is not the first time that the subject of incorporating electric trolleybuses into the MTA’s bus system comes before the MTA Board of Directors. In the 1992 30-Year Integrated Transportation Plan, electric trolleybuses were the preferred solution to meet CARB air regulations. The Plan provided for 18 routes, 300 miles of overhead wires and 400 peak electric trolleybuses by 2004 to be increased to 1,100 peak electric trolleybuses by 2010. Eventually, the Board voted to terminate the project. After reviewing the various technologies that might qualify as zero emissions under CARB rule, the report focuses on electric trolleybuses as the technology of choice.
[Show full text]
AGENCY PROFILE and FACTS RTD Services at a Glance
AGENCY PROFILE AND FACTS RTD Services at a Glance Buses & Rail SeniorRide SportsRides Buses and trains connect SeniorRide buses provide Take RTD to a local the metro area and offer an essential service to our sporting event, Eldora an easy RTDway to Denver services senior citizen at community. a glanceMountain Resort, or the International Airport. BolderBoulder. Buses and trains connect and the metro trainsarea and offer an easy way to Denver International Airport. Access-a-Ride Free MallRide Access-a-RideAccess-a-Ride helps meet the Freetravel MallRideneeds of passengers buses with disabilities.Park-n-Rides Access-a-RideFlexRide helps connect the entire length Make connections with meet theFlexRide travel needsbuses travel of within selectof downtown’s RTD service areas.16th Catch FlexRideour to connect buses toand other trains RTD at bus or passengerstrain with servies disabilities. or get direct accessStreet to shopping Mall. malls, schools, and more.89 Park-n-Rides. SeniorRide SeniorRide buses serve our senior community. Free MallRide FlexRideFree MallRide buses stop everyFree block onMetroRide downtown’s 16th Street Mall.Bike-n-Ride FlexRideFree buses MetroRide travel within Free MetroRide buses Bring your bike with you select RTDFree service MetroRide areas. buses offer convenientoffer convenient connections rush-hour for downtown commuterson the bus along and 18th train. and 19th Connectstreets. to other RTD connections for downtown SportsRides buses or trains or get direct commuters along 18th and Take RTD to a local sporting event, Eldora Mountain Resort, or the BolderBoulder. access toPark-n-Rides shopping malls, 19th streets. schools, Makeand more.connections with our buses and trains at more than 89 Park-n-Rides.
[Show full text]
Brookfield Properties' Retail Group Overview
Retail Overview Brookfield Properties’ Retail Group Overview We are Great Gathering Places. We embrace our cultural core values of Humility, Attitude, Do The Right Thing, H Together and Own It. HUMILITY Brookfield Properties’ retail group is a company focused A ATTITUDE exclusively on managing, leasing, and redeveloping high- quality retail properties throughout the United States. D DO THE RIGHT THING T TOGETHER O HEADQUARTERS CHICAGO OWN IT RETAIL PROPERTIES 160+ STATES 42 INLINE & FREESTANDING GLA 68 MILLION SQ FT TOTAL RETAIL GLA 145 MILLION SQ FT PROFORMA EQUITY MARKET CAP $20 BILLION PROFORMA ENTERPRISE VALUE $40 BILLION Portfolio Map 2 7 1 4 3 5 3 6 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 4 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 10 4 2 5 1 4 10 2 3 3 1 48 91 6 5 6 2 7 6 4 5 11 7 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 7 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 5 3 4 15 19 2 14 11 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 6 2 1 3 4 18 2 17 3 1 2 1 3 2 2 5 3 6 8 2 1 12 9 7 5 1 4 3 1 2 1 2 16 3 4 13 3 1 2 6 1 7 9 1 10 5 4 2 1 4 6 11 5 3 6 2 Portfolio Properties 1 2 3 3 3 1 7 4 Offices 13 12 2 Atlanta, GA 7 3 1 1 Chicago, IL Baltimore, MD 8 5 2 Dallas, TX 4 Los Angeles, CA 6 New York, NY 8 2 9 5 Property Listings by State ALABAMA 7 The Oaks Mall • Gainesville 3 The Mall in Columbia • Columbia (Baltimore) 9 Brookfield Place • Manhattan WASHINGTON 8 Pembroke Lakes Mall • Pembroke Pines 4 Mondawmin Mall • Baltimore 10 Manhattan West • Manhattan 1 Riverchase Galleria • Hoover (Birmingham) 1 Alderwood • Lynnwood (Seattle) 5 Towson Town Center • Towson (Baltimore) 11 Staten Island Mall • Staten Island 2 The Shoppes at Bel Air • Mobile (Fort Lauderdale)
[Show full text]
King County Metro Transit: Expanding Its Role from Service Provider to Mobility Manager
Advancing Mobility Management King County Metro Transit: expanding its role from service provider to mobility manager Agency: King County Metro Location: Seattle, WA Service Area: King County, WA Modes: Bus, Rideshare, Vanpools, Paratransit services, Sound Transit’s regional Express bus service, Link light rail in King County, Seattle Streetcar, Water Taxi Community Context: King County Transit Advisory Commission, including residents, businesses, and other stakeholders appointed by the King County Executive and approved by the King County Council (formed by nine members representing the districts). Key Contacts: Name: Jean Paul Velez Position: Innovative Mobility Program Manager, King County Metro Email: [email protected] Phone: 206-477-7694 OVERVIEW King County Metro provides a wide range of transportation options for the King County. It operates the region’s largest bus network, vanpools, paratransit services, and several programs to promote ridesharing. It also operates Sound Transit’s regional Express bus service and Link light rail in King County, along with the Seattle Streetcar. Metro has a long history of innovations that expand the traditional transit services, from launching a vanpool program in the 1970s, to incubating car-sharing and bike-sharing programs in the 2000s. The more programmatic efforts to engage with the new mobility landscape began in 2016, with the agency moving from its role of service provider towards a broader role where it proactively leverages services to deliver better mobility for the region. The strategic research initiatives and service pilots considered in the Innovative Mobility Program are guided by the long-term plan Metro Connects, which reflects the King County Metro Transit’s vision for bringing people more services, more choices and one easy-to-use system over the next 25 years (2040).
[Show full text]