DOCSLIB.ORG

S.Y. Luria Democritus Texts Translation Investigations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

S.Y. LURIA DEMOCRITUS TEXTS TRANSLATION INVESTIGATIONS English translation by C.C.W. TAYLOR NAUKA PUBLISHERS Leningrad 1970 Copyright Note I have tried unsuccessfully to identify the present holder or holders of the copyright in Luria’s book, in order to seek permission for the publication of this translation. Enquiries made of the publisher in Moscow and St Petersburg and of the Society of Russian Authors in St Petersburg have failed to elicit the information sought. CCWT CONTENTS Translator’s preface Editors’ preface Abbreviations Texts Variant readings Concordance Luria – DK Index locorum Translation of texts Commentary Works of S.Y Luria relating to Democritus TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE In this volume I present a translation into English of S.Y. Luria’s edition of the fragments of Democritus and of the testimonia relating to him. The work has the sole aim of making Luria’s work available to students in the English-speaking world and in other countries worldwide who are familiar with English but not with Russian. A valuable Italian translation of Luria’s work (Democrito, Raccolta dei frammenti, interpretazione e commentario di Salomon Luria, ed. G. Girgenti et al., Edizione Bompioni, Milan) appeared in 2007, but my impression of the current level of comprehension of Italian, even among students of ancient philosophy, convinces me that, regrettably, only an English translation can expect to reach a truly worldwide audience. Our author’s full name, spelled in the Cyrillic alphabet, is Соломон Яковлевич Лурье, to which the closest approximation in the Roman alphabet is ‘Solomon Yakovlevich Lurye’. However, in publications in languages using the Roman alphabet. Including the appropriate portions of the present volume, he uniformly spells his surname ‘Luria’. That spelling, which is standard in publications using the Roman alphabet, is used throughout this volume. I have translated into English i) the preface by the original editorial board (pp. 5-10 of the original publication), ii) Luria’s collection of texts (pp. 13-167), iii) his notes on the texts (pp. 385-615), iv) the list of his publications relating to Democritus (pp. 616-617). In translating the texts I have not re-translated Luria’s Russian, but have translated the texts directly, comparing my version as required with Luria’s Russian and with the Italian version. Any significant discrepancies between my version and Luria’s are noted in the translator’s footnotes to the texts, enclosed in square brackets. I have reproduced Luria’s apparatus criticus (pp. 168-186) without translation, on the ground that it is likely to be useful only to those who have sufficient grasp of the ancient languages to appreciate the significance of the textual variants. Nor have I translated the remaining editorial matter (pp. 618 ff.), consisting of i) concordance between the collections of Luria and Diels-Kranz (pp. 623-628), ii) index locorum (pp. 629-652), iii) list of sources (pp. 653-662), iv) table of contents (pp. 653-654), v) addenda and corrigenda (pp. 618-619), vi) further errata (pp. 655-656). Of the above, I have included i-ii in the original, as readily usable by the reader who knows no Russian, and have omitted iii-vi altogether: iii is replaced by my own list of abbreviations, all the headings under iv appear in translation at the appropriate points of the text and notes, and under v and vi, the only two items of significance for the interpretation of the text (referring to Luria’s notes on nos. 71 and 376), are discussed in the translator’s notes on those passages. All contributions by the translator, whether in the form of footnotes to the texts or to Luria’s notes, or of insertions in the text, are enclosed in square brackets. These contributions include correction of some errors in Taylor 1999. Footnotes are numbered consecutively throught the volume. Those in square brackets are the translator’s, those without square brackets are Luria’s. In his notes Luria quotes extensively from ancient sources, in the original languages, and from modern discussions, sometimes in the original language and sometimes in Russian translation. I have translated all these quotations into English. When comprehension of the note requires reproduction of the original of the quoted text I have accompanied it with the English translation in square brackets. Titles of works in Russian, including articles, monographs and periodicals, are translated into English; titles of works in other languages are cited in the original language. All quoted Greek and most quoted Russian is transliterated. I am especially indebted to David Sedley for his generosity in lending me his copy of Luria ‘sine die’. Without that assistance I should not have been able to undertake this work. For setting up the online version I am grateful to Solomon Young, of the IT department of Corpus Christi College. I am most grateful to Terry Irwin, Peter Momtchiloff and Andy Davies for their support and advice. Corpus Christi College, C.C.W. Taylor Oxford, U.K. January 2016 Friends, do not mourn at my tomb, For I do not truly lie here as bones and dust; Rather my thoughts remain for ever With all who have well understood the wisdom of the Greeks. Epitaph of S.Y Luria, Lvov. From the Editorial Board This volume consists of a collection, with commentary, of passages from the writings of the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus and testimonia relating to him. None of the works of the greatest materialist of antiquity has come down to us. The fragments of his works have been preserved only in the form of quotations and comments by ancient and later authors. The task of reconstructing the scientific legacy and the world-view of Democritus is especially difficult, both because of the fragmentary state of the surviving texts and because the great mass of testimonia about him has been preserved by authors far from his philosophical views or indifferent to the deep problems of Democritean philosophy. This collection of passages of Democritus and testimonia about him was compiled by the famous specialist on the history of ancient culture and philosophy, Prof. S.Y. Luria.1 His work on Democritus began in 1920 and continued till the last days of his life. The manuscript of the collection of passages, which was virtually complete, is here published posthumously. Unfortunately Luria was unable to complete the extensive introduction to the collection, in which he had planned to set out the principles of his selection of texts and of their attribution to Democritus. Several preliminary drafts of that introduction survive. In the most complete of them Luria writes: ‘This work presents a major new collection of passages from Democritus and testimonia on him, with Russian translation. Until now the largest collection of the fragments of Democritus has been Diels’ Die Fragments der Vorsokratiker, published in 1903. Diels, who had minutely studied the whole of ancient philosophy and related literature and had in virtuoso fashion revolutionised the method of study of doxographical reports of ancient philosophers (see his earlier Doxographi Graeci, 1879), wrote the classic work, after the publication of which in all serious work on ancient Greek philosophy the citations of the philosophers were made only from Diels. Diels’ book, despite its specialised character and high price, went through eight editions in Germany and was translated into several languages. Nevertheless, despite all its value, Diels’ collection is largely out of date and now possesses merely historical significance. Research, especially on Democritus, has made enormous progress since 1903. Moreover, Diels proceeded from a specific ideological standpoint. The title ‘Presocratics’ alone represents an entire programme; the highest achievement of Greek thought is recognised as that of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and their followers, and the entire role of Greek science of the classical period is reduced to preparation for Socrates and his disciples. Though Diels never says so explicitly in Die Vorsokratiker2, anyone who reads his book carefully sees that for him genuine philosophy is idealistic philosophy, and materialism is confined to the role of one of its fruitful sources. Not only in the area of logic (which is undisputed), and in that of systematic philosophy based on that formal logic (which is possible), but in the area of the exact sciences, from the point of view of Diels and those who share his opinion Aristotle is the highest point of antiquity. This despite the fact that Aristotle himself did not regard himself as engaged in the area of those sciences: in his opinion ‘excessively persistent study of the liberal sciences in full detail is demeaning for a person’; one should study the sciences ‘only within certain 1 [Throughout this introduction the editors refer to the author by initials plus surname. In accordance with the convention current in Western academic publications, the translator has used this style for the first reference only, subsequent references being by surname only.] 2 This is said in another book of his, Elementum, Leipzig, 1899, pp. 1 ff., which contains a series of ironical attacks on materialism (Darwinism). limits’, obviously to the extent necessary for constructing one’s philosophical world-view.3 Galileo showed that in the area of natural science Aristotle’s science was a regression by comparison with that of Democritus. Only in the areas of mathematics and astronomy was Aristotle’s science superior to that of Democritus; and that was not due to any contributions by Aristotle himself, but to the fact that in the time between Democritus and Aristotle these sciences had made some progress at the hands of Theaetetus, Eudoxus and others, while indeed giving up some major achievements which had been made in the fifth century and especially in the doctrine of Democritus.
Recommended publications
  • ARISTOXENUS of TARENTUM Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities

    ARISTOXENUS of TARENTUM Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities

    ARISTOXENUS OF TARENTUM Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities Series Editor: David C. Mirhady Advisory Board: William W. Fortenbaugh Dimitri Gutas Pamela M. Huby Timothy C. Powers Eckart Schütrumpf On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus I Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work II Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion and Rhetoric III Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos IV 7KHRSKUDVWXV+LV3V\FKRORJLFDO'R[RJUDSKLFDODQG6FLHQWLÀF Writings V Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle VI The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformation of Classical Traditions presented to Professor I.G. Kidd VII Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources VIII Demetrius of Phalerum: Text, Translation and Discussion IX Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation and Discussion X Eudemus of Rhodes XI Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes XII Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation and Discussion XIII Heraclides of Pontus: Text and Translation XIV Heraclides of Pontus: Discussion XV Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion XVI ARISTO XENUS OF TARENTUM DISCUSSION RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDIES IN CLASSICAL HUMANITIES VOLUMEXVU EDITED BY eARL A. HUFFMAN First published 2012 by Transaction Publishers Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2012 by Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
  • A History of Cynicism

    A History of Cynicism

    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
  • The University of Western Ontario Department of Philosophy Comprehensive Exam Reading List Early Modern Philosophy (1580-1800)

    The University of Western Ontario Department of Philosophy Comprehensive Exam Reading List Early Modern Philosophy (1580-1800)

    The University of Western Ontario Department of Philosophy Comprehensive Exam Reading List Early Modern Philosophy (1580-1800) Michael Montaigne. “Apology for Raymond Sebond.” Translated by Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2003. [164] Rene Descartes. Meditations on First Philosophy and The Second and Fourth Sets of Objections and Replies. Volume 2 of The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [133] Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan. Edited by Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1994. Parts I and II. [239] Baruch Spinoza. The Ethics. In Baruch Spinoza: Ethics, Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect and Selected Letters. Translated by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1992. Parts I and II. [70] Nicolas Malebranche. Search after Truth. In Nicolas Malebranche: Philosophical Selections. Edited by Steven Nadler. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1992. [144] G.W. Leibniz. “Primary Truths,” “Discourse on Metaphysics,” “The Correspondence with Arnauld” and “The Principles of Nature and Grace.” In G.W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1989. [65] John Locke. An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Kenneth Winkler. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1996. II.i-xxxiii, III.iii and vi, and IV.i-iv and xi- xvi. [217] John Locke. Two Treaties of Government. Edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960. Second Treatise. [161] The British Moralists (Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Hutcheson, and Butler). The British Moralists 1650-1800. Volume 1, Hobbes – Gay. Edited by D.D. Raphael. Pp. 169- 188, 229-236, 261-299, and 325-364. [73] Pierre Bayle.
  • Ancient Greek Physicians

    Ancient Greek Physicians

    Ancient Greek physicians Abascantus Acesias Acron Acumenus Adamantius Aegimus Aelianus Meccius Aelius Promotus Aeschines (physician) Aeschrion of Pergamon Agapetus (physician) Agathinus Agnodice Alcmaeon of Croton Alexander of Tralles Alexander Philalethes Epipodius and Alexander Alexias Alexion Alexippus Amentes Ammonius Lithotomos Anaxilaus Andreas (physician) Androcydes (physician) Andromachus Andromachus (physician) Andron (physician) Andronicus (physician) Anicia Anonymus Londinensis Antaeus (physician) Antigenes Antigonus (physician) Antiochis Antiochus (physician) Antiochus Philometor Antipater (1st-century BC physician) Antipater (2nd-century physician) Antiphanes of Delos Antonius (herbalist) Antyllus Apollodorus (physician) Apollonides (physician) Apollonides of Cos Apollonios of Kition Apollonius (physician) Archigenes Aretaeus of Cappadocia Aristogenes (physician) Aristoxenus (physician) Asclepiades of Bithynia Asclepiades Pharmacion Aspasia the Physician Athenaeus of Attalia Athryilatus B Bacchius of Tanagra Bolus of Mendes C Calliphon of Croton Chrysippus of Cnidos Claudius Agathemerus Criton of Heraclea Ctesias D Damocrates Democedes Demosthenes Philalethes Dexippus of Cos Dieuches Diocles of Carystus Pedanius Dioscorides Diphilus (physician) Draco (physician) E Epicles Erasistratus Eudemus (physician) Eudoxus of Cnidus Euphorbus (physician) Euryphon Evenor G Galen Glaucias (physician, 3rd century BC) Glaucias (physician, 4th century BC)
  • The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism

    The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism

    Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum Studies and Texts in Antiquity and Christianity Herausgeber/Editor: CHRISTOPH MARKSCHIES (Berlin) Beirat/Advisory Board HUBERT CANCIK (Berlin) • GIOVANNI CASADIO (Salerno) SUSANNA ELM (Berkeley) • JOHANNES HAHN (Münster) JÖRG RÜPKE (Erfurt) 23 John Granger Cook The Interprétation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism Mohr Siebeck JOHN GRANGER COOK, born 1955; 1976 B.A. in Philosophy, Davidson College; 1979 M. Div., Union Theological Seminary (VA); 1982-83 Doctoral research at the University of Gottin- gen; 1985 Ph.D. at Emory University; 1985-91 Pastor at Reems Creek Presbyterian Parish in Weaverville, NC/USA; 1991-94 post doctoral studies at Emory University; since 1994 Associate Professor of Religion and Philosophy at LaGrange College, GA/USA. ISBN 3-16-148474-6 ISSN 1436-3003 (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum) Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2004 by Mohr Siebeck,Tübingen, Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Held in Rottenburg. Printed in Germany. For my doctoral fathers, Prof. David Hellholm and the late Prof. William Beardslee, with heartfelt gratitude Table of Contents Introduction 1 0.1 Hecataeus of Abdera (ca 300 B.C.E.) 4 0.2 Manetho (III B.C.E.) 6 0.3 Ocellus Lucanus (II B.C.E.) 8 0.4 Lysimachus 9 0.5 Apollonius Molon (I B.C.E.) 11 0.6 Alexander Polyhistor (ca 105-35 B.C.E.) 13 0.7 Diodorus Siculus (I B.C.E.) 16 0.8 Nicolaus of Damascus 19 0.9 Strabo (ca 64 B.C.E.
  • Muslim Scientists and Thinkers

    Muslim Scientists and Thinkers

    MUSLIM SCIENTISTS AND THINKERS Syed Aslam Second edition 2010 Copyright 2010 by Syed Aslam Publisher The Muslim Observer 29004 W. Eight Mile Road Farmington, MI 48336 Cover Statue of Ibn Rushd Cordoba, Spain ISBN 978-1-61584-980-2 Printed in India Lok-Hit Offset Shah-e-Alam Ahmedabad Gujarat ii Dedicated to Ibn Rushd and other Scientists and Thinkers of the Islamic Golden Age iii CONTENTS Acknowledgments ................................................VI Foreword .............................................................VII Introduction ..........................................................1 1 Concept of Knowledge in Islam ............................8 2 Abu Musa Jabir Ibn Hayyan..................................25 3 Al-Jahiz abu Uthman Ibn Bahar ...........................31 4 Muhammad Ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi....................35 5 Abu Yaqoub Ibn Ishaq al-Kindi ............................40 6 Muhammad bin Zakaria Razi ...............................45 7 Jabir ibn Sinan al-Batani.......................................51 8 Abu Nasar Mohammad ibn al-Farabi....................55 9 Abu Wafa ibn Ismail al-Buzjani ...........................61 10 Abu Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham .......................66 11 Abu Rayhan ibn al-Biruni ....................................71 12 Ali al-Hussain ibn Sina ........................................77 13 Abu Qasim ibn al-Zahrawi ..................................83 iv 14 Omar Khayyam ...................................................88 15 Abu Hamid al-Ghazali .........................................93
  • 6 X 10. Three Lines .P65

    6 X 10. Three Lines .P65

    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83746-0 - Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King Carl A. Huffman Excerpt More information part one Introductory essays © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83746-0 - Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King Carl A. Huffman Excerpt More information chapter i Life, writings and reception sources (The original texts and translations of the testimonia for Archytas’ life are found in Part Three, Section One) Archytas did not live the life of a philosophical recluse. He was the leader of one of the most powerful Greek city-states in the first half of the fourth century bc. Unfortunately he is similar to most important Greek intellec- tuals of the fifth and fourth centuries bc, in that we have extremely little reliable information about his activities. This dearth of information is all the more frustrating since we know that Aristoxenus wrote a biography of Archytas, not long after his death (A9). Two themes bulk large in the bits of evidence that do survive from that biography and from other evidence for Archytas’ life. First, there is Archytas’ connection to Plato, which, as we will see, was more controversial in antiquity than in most modern scholarship. The Platonic Seventh Letter, whose authenticity continues to be debated, portrays Archytas as saving Plato from likely death, when Plato was visit- ing the tyrant Dionysius II at Syracuse in 361 bc. Second, for Aristoxenus, Archytas is the paradigm of a successful leader. Elected general (strat¯egos) repeatedly, he was never defeated in battle; as a virtuous, kindly and demo- cratic ruler, he played a significant role in the great prosperity of his native Tarentum, located on the heel of southern Italy.
  • DIOGENES of SINOPE Diogenes of Sinope (C

    DIOGENES of SINOPE Diogenes of Sinope (C

    DIOGENES OF SINOPE Diogenes of Sinope (c. 412‐323 BC), a contemporary of Plato and Aristotle, is considered the founder of the philosophical school of Cynicism. Concerned more with action than with words, he left no writings. What we know of his thought is what has been related to us by contempo‐ raries and later scholars. The most extensive account is from Diogenes Laertes, writing almost 500 years after Diogenes lived. LIFE OF DIOGENES OF SINOPE, THE CYNIC (404‐323 BC) RD BY DIOGENES LAERTIUS (3 CENTURY AD) Diogenes was a native of Sinope, son of Hicesius, a banker. Diocles relates that he went into exile because his father was entrusted with the money of the state and adulterated the coin‐ age. But Eubulides in his book on Diogenes says that Diogenes himself did this and was forced to leave home along with his father. Moreover Diogenes himself actually confesses in his Porde‐ lus that he adulterated the coinage. Some say that having been appointed to superintend the workmen he was persuaded by them, and that he went to Delphi or to the Delian oracle in his own city and inquired of Apollo whether he should do what he was urged to do. When the god gave him permission to alter the political currency, not understanding what this meant, he adulterated the state coinage, and when he was detected, according to some he was banished, while according to others he voluntarily quitted the city for fear of consequences. One version is that his father entrusted him with the money and that he debased it, in consequence of which the father was imprisoned and died, while the son fled, came to Delphi, and inquired, not whether he should falsify the coinage, but what he should do to gain the greatest reputation; and that then it was that he received the oracle.
  • Aristotle's Contribution to Scholarly Communication

    Aristotle's Contribution to Scholarly Communication

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2008 Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication Stephen Edward Bales University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Bales, Stephen Edward, "Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2008. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/475 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Stephen Edward Bales entitled "Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Communication and Information. J. Michael Pemberton, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Suzie Allard, Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon, Dwight Teeter Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Stephen Edward Bales entitled “Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Communication & Information.
  • 74 Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy §1

    74 Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy §1

    74 DIODORUS CRONUS AND HELLENISTIC PHILOSOPHY §1. Introduction.1 During the last four decades historians of ancient logic have become increasingly aware of the importance of Diodorus Cronus and his pupil Philo as pioneers of the propositional logic which came to flourish in the Stoa.^ Their direct influence has so far been recognised in two main areas of Hellenistic controversy — the validity-criteria for conditional propo- sitions, and the definition of the modal terms 'possible' and 'necessary'. But some broader questions have not been satisfactorily answered. What were Diodorus' own philosophical allegiances and antecedents? What is his place in the history of Greek philosophy? How far-reaching was his influence on the post-Aristotelian philosophers? There was little chance of tackling these questions confidently until 1972, when Klaus Doring published for the first time the collected fragments of Diodorus, in his important volume Die Megariker. Meagre though they are, these fragments confirm my suspicion that Diodorus' philosophical background has not been fully explored, and also that his influence on the three emerging Hellenistic schools — the Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics — was far wider than has hitherto been recognised. There has been much discussion as to which earlier philoso- phers played the most decisive part in shaping Hellenistic philosophy, and the respective claims of the Platonists and of Aristotle have never lacked expert advocacy. In all this, the claims of so obscure a figure as Diodorus have been underrated. §2. Diodorus'school. Although Diodorus was not active before the last part of the fourth century, any discussion of his philosophical allegiances must begin with Euclides of Megara at the beginning of the century.
  • Remarks Upon Alchemy and the Alchemists

    Remarks Upon Alchemy and the Alchemists

    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Research Library, The Getty Research Institute http://www.archive.org/details/remarksuponalcheOOhitc NEW THOUGTIT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION' No. REMARKS ALCHEMY AND THE ALCHEMISTS, INDICATIXG A METHOD OF DISCOVEKI^'G THE TEUE NATURE OF HERMETIC PHILOSOPHY; A^D SHOWING THAT THE SEARCH AFTER HAD NOT FOR ITS OBJECT THE DISCOVERY OF AN AGENT FOR THE TRANSMUTATION OF METALS. BEING ALSO AS ATTEMPT TO RESCUE FROM UNDESERVED OPPROBRIUM THE REPUTATION OF A CLASS OF EXTEAORDIXARY THINKEES IN PAST AGES. ' Man shall not live by bread alone." BOSTON: CROSBY, NICHOLS, AND COMPANY, 111 Washington Street. 1857. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1857, by Crosby, Nichols, and Company, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts. cambsidge: metcalf and company, printers to the tjnrversitt. NE¥/ THOUGHT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION No. PEEFACE. ED.W. PARKER, L ittle Ruc k, Ark. It may seem superfluous in the author of the fol- lowing remarks to disclaim the purpose of re vivino- the study of Alchemy, or the method of teaching adopted by the Alchemists. Alchemical works stand related to moral and intellectual geography, some- what as the skeletons of ichthyosauri and plesio- sauri are related to geology. They are skeletons of thought in past ages. It is chiefly from this point of view that the writer of the following pages submits his opinions upon Alchemy to the public. He is convinced that the character of the Alchemists, and the object of their study, have been almost universally misconceived ; and as a matter of fact^ though of the past, he thinks it of sufficient importance to take a step in the right direction for developing the true nature of the studies of that extraordinary class of thinkers.
  • Philosophy of Chemistry, Integrated Science 2, 144 Author Index

    Philosophy of Chemistry, Integrated Science 2, 144 Author Index

    Author Index A Brahe, Tycho, 65 Abegg, Richard, 118 Bunsen, Robert Wilhelm Eberhard, 113 Alexander the Great, 32 Butlerov, Aleksandr Mihajlovič, 89 Alkindus, al-Sabah, 40 Al-Ihmimi, 40 C Al-Razi, Abu Bekr Muhammad ibn Zakariyya, Cannizzaro, Stanislao, 111 42 Carnap, Rudolf, 10 Al-Sabah, Abu Jusuf Jakub ibn Ishak, Cartesius, René Descartes, 48 Alkindus, 40 Carus, Titus, Lucretius, 27 Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, 24 Cavendish, Henry, 59 Anaximander of Miletus, 21 Cimabue (painter), 25 Anaximenes of Miletus, 21 Cleopatra of Alexandria, 35 Angelico, Beato, Fra. Angelico, 25, 26 Comarius, 33 Aquinas, St. Thomas, 25, 43 Comenius, Jan Amoš Komenski, 52 Aristotle of Stagira, 22 Comte, Auguste, 10 Arrhenius, Svante August, 109 Copernicus, Nicolaus, 11 Averroes, Ibn-Ružd, 40 Cosimo il Vecchio, 48 Avicena, Ibn-Sina, 40 Couper, Archibald Scott, 89 Avogadro, Amedeo, 111 Cram, Donald James, 133 Crum Brown, Alexander, 90 B Bacon, Roger, Doctor Mirabilis, 43 D Balaban, Alexandru, 114 Dalton, John, 74 Bayen, Pierre, 57 Davy, Humphry, 85 Bellosztenecz, Ivan, 27 Democritus of Abdera, 24 Berthollet, Claude Louis, 69, 75 de Morveau, Louis-Bernard Guyton, 69 Berzelius, Jöns Jacob, 28, 81 Descartes, René, Cartesius, 48 Biot, Jean Baptist, 105 Döbereiner, Johan, 97 Black, Joseph, 59 Doctor Mirabilis, Roger Bacon, 43 Boerhaave, Hermann, 49 Duhem, Pierre, 11, 12 Bohr, Niels, 118 Dumas, Jean Baptiste Andre, 85 Bolus of Mendes, 35 Born, Max, 108 E Bošković, Rugjer Josip, 50 Eco, Umberto, 41 Boyle, Robert, 53, 60 Empedocles of Akragas (Agrigento), 21 Bragg, Sir William Henry, 114 Epicurus of Samos, 26 Bragg, Sir William Lawrence, 114 Euler, Leonhard, 103 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer 143 Nature Switzerland AG 2021 H.