DOCSLIB.ORG

BUNDA TOWN November 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BUNDA TOWN November 2008 United Nations Human Settlements Programme UN-HABITAT LAKE VICTORIA REGION WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAMME APPRAISAL REPORT BUNDA TOWN November 2008 UN-HABITAT – LVWATSAN Bunda Appraisal Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BUNDA TOWN PROFILE............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BUNDA DISTRICT ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 BUNDA TOWN COUNCIL.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 BUNDA URBAN WATER SUPPLY ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 POPULATION ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 VULNERABLE GROUPS................................................................................................................................2 2 RESULTS OF THE URBAN INEQUITY SURVEY IN BUNDA................................................................. 3 2.1 URBAN INEQUITY SURVEY (UIS)................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 PRESENTATION OF THE UIS SURVEY, AVAILABILITY OF RESULTS FOR BUNDA .......................................... 3 2.3 SOME OF THE UIS RESULTS HIGHLIGHTED ................................................................................................. 3 2.4 WHAT IS ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY COVERAGE?..................................................................................... 5 2.5 WHAT IS ADEQUATE PROVISION OF SANITATION?...................................................................................... 6 3 WATER SUPPLY ............................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 INSTITUTIONAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM ................................................................................ 7 3.2.1 General Overview ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Management of BUWSA........................................................................................................................ 7 3.2.3 Main Components of the existing Bunda Water Supply System............................................................ 8 3.3 REHABILITATION OF BUNDA WATER SUPPLY INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................. 11 3.4 TARIFFS AND METERING........................................................................................................................... 11 3.5 OTHER POTENTIAL RAW WATER SOURCES............................................................................................... 11 3.6 PROBLEMS WITH THE WATER SUPPLY FOR BUNDA ................................................................................... 12 3.7 WATER SUPPLY IN LOW INCOME AREAS .................................................................................................. 12 4 SEWERAGE AND SANITATION ................................................................................................................ 13 4.1 AVAILABLE SANITATION .......................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 SANITATION IN LOW-INCOME AREAS ....................................................................................................... 13 4.3 HEALTH HAZARDS OF POOR SANITATION ................................................................................................. 13 5 SOLID WASTE AND DRAINAGE............................................................................................................... 14 5.1 SOLID WASTE ........................................................................................................................................... 14 5.2 URBAN DRAINAGE.................................................................................................................................... 14 6 URBAN PHYSICAL PLANNING................................................................................................................. 15 6.1 EARLIER ATTEMPTS AT PHYSICAL PLANNING........................................................................................... 15 6.2 NEED FOR PHYSICAL PLANNING ............................................................................................................... 15 6.3 WAY FORWARD ........................................................................................................................................ 15 7 ORPHANS AND OTHER VULNERABLE GROUPS ................................................................................ 16 7.1 THE IMPACT OF THE HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIC IN BUNDA ............................................................................... 16 7.2 CHALLENGES ............................................................................................................................................ 16 7.3 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS HIV/AIDS....................................................................................................... 16 7.4 HIV/AIDS ORPHANS................................................................................................................................17 7.5 THE IMPACT OF HIV/AIDS ON LAND RIGHTS........................................................................................... 17 7.6 EXISTING FACILITIES IN BUNDA FOR ORPHANS ........................................................................................ 17 7.7 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS ........................................................................................ 18 8 TRAINING AND CAPACITY BUILDING..................................................................................................19 8.1 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS......................................................................................................................... 19 8.2 FAST-TRACK CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMME...................................................................................... 19 8.3 CAPACITY BUILDING FOR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES ................................................ 20 9 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY .............................................................................................................. 21 9.1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY.................................................................................................................... 21 November 2008 UN-HABITAT – LVWATSAN Bunda Appraisal Report 9.2 MULTI-STAKEHOLDERS FORUM (MSF) OR PEOPLE’S PARLIAMENT .......................................................... 21 9.3 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT (PIU) AT THE TOWN LEVEL................................................................... 21 9.4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU) AT NATIONAL LEVEL..................................................................... 21 9.5 OVERALL APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................. 22 9.6 MSF ESTABLISHED IN BUNDA................................................................................................................... 23 9.7 ISSUES RAISED DURING THE MSF MEETING ............................................................................................. 24 10 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED.................................................... 28 10.1 DEVELOP LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BUNDA TC .................................................................. 28 10.2 WATER SUPPLY......................................................................................................................................... 28 10.3 SANITATION.............................................................................................................................................. 29 10.4 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................... 29 10.5 DRAINAGE ................................................................................................................................................ 29 10.6 URBAN PHYSICAL PLANNING.................................................................................................................... 30 10.7 CAPACITY BUILDING................................................................................................................................. 30 10.8 ADVOCACY AND AWARENESS RAISING .................................................................................................... 30 10.9 URBAN CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................ 30 10.10 GENDER MAINSTREAMING AND SUPPORT TO VULNERABLE GROUPS........................................................ 30 11 PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS................................................................................................................... 31 11.1 WATER SUPPLY: ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Fisheries Assessment Report Mara River Basin, Tanzania
    Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Fisheries Assessment Report Mara River Basin, Tanzania Mkindo River Catchment, Wami RivrBasin, Tanzania |i Integrated Management of Coastal and Freshwater Systems Program Fisheries in Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Baseline Survey of Fisheries Resources in the Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Mara River Basin, Tanzania Mara Basin, Tanzania Fisheries in Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Funding for this publication was provided by the people of the United States of America through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), as a component of the Integrated Management of Coastal and Freshwater Systems Leader with Associates (LWA) Agreement No. EPP-A-00-04-00015-00. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Agency for International Development of the United States Government or Florida International University. Copyright © Global Water for Sustainability Program – Florida International University This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of the publication may be made for resale or for any commercial purposes whatsoever without the prior permission in writing from the Florida International University - Global Water for Sustainability Program. Any inquiries can be addressed to the same at the following address: Global Water for Sustainability Program Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus 3000 NE 151 St. ACI-267 North Miami, FL 33181 USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.globalwaters.net For bibliographic purposes, this document should be cited as: Baseline Survey of Fisheries Resources in the Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay, Mara6 Basin, Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • FP Allocation in 3 Districts Mara
    HEALTH PROMOTION TANZANIA (HDT) Three Rural Districts Allocate $20,700 for Family Planning in Tanzania Three rural districts in Mara Region of Tanzania with lowest contraceptive prevalence rates in the country have made budget allocations for family planning totaling US $20,700. This results from advocacy that was led by local Advance Family Planning partner Health Promotion Tanzania (HDT) in Serengeti District and Tarime Town Councils who allocated fund from their own sources for the first time while Musoma Rural District Council surpassing double their family planning allocation from the previous year (2014/15). The district-level engagement resulted in commitments for family planning budget allocations which were approved during the parliamentary budget session of May-June 2015. Approximately $10,588 from Serengeti District Council, $7,647 from Musoma Rural District Council, and $2,529 from Tarime Town Council were approved. HDT engaged in the three district level advocacy through a series of activities that began in August 2014. They first collaborated with technical teams in the district medical offices to conduct needs assessment across the focus districts to establish evidence for family planning needs and develop messaging. In September, HDT met with district council AFP team in discussion with DMOs of seven Disricts from leadership to prioritize investment in Mara Region family planning through meetings with District Planning Officers and Secretaries to the District Councils and presenting proposals to the Council Committees for Social Services. HDT also organized a regional meeting bringing together all districts in the region to present data from the three focus districts and engage health team members to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE VICTORIA Commercial Agriculture –Especiallycoffee Andcotton–Are Increasingly Important
    © Lonely Planet Publications 240 Lake Victoria LAKE VICTORIA Lake Victoria is Africa’s largest lake, and the second-largest freshwater lake in the world. While the Tanzanian portion sees only a trickle of tourists, the region holds many attractions for those who have a bent for the offbeat and who want to immerse themselves in the rhythms of local life. At the Bujora Cultural Centre near Mwanza, you can learn Sukuma dancing and get acquainted with the culture of Tanzania’s largest tribal group. Further north at Butiama is the Nyerere museum, an essential stop for anyone interested in the great statesman. Musoma and Bukoba – both with a sleepy, waterside charm – are ideal places for getting a taste of lakeshore life. Bukoba is also notable as the heartland of the Haya people, who had one of the most highly developed early societies on the continent. Mwanza, to the southeast, is Tanzania’s second largest city after Dar es Salaam, and an increasingly popular jumping off point for safaris into the Serengeti’s Western Corridor. To the southwest is Rubondo Island National Park for bird-watching and relaxing. The best way to explore the lake region is as part of a larger loop combining Uganda and/or Kenya with Tanzania’s northern circuit via the western Serengeti, although you’ll need time, and a tolerance for rough roads. While most accommodation is no-frills, there are a few idyllic getaways – notably on Rubondo and Lukuba Islands, and near Mwanza. Most locals you’ll meet rely on fishing and small-scale farming for their living, although industry and commercial agriculture – especially coffee and cotton – are increasingly important.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Africa: Security and the Legacy of Fragility
    Eastern Africa: Security and the Legacy of Fragility Africa Program Working Paper Series Gilbert M. Khadiagala OCTOBER 2008 INTERNATIONAL PEACE INSTITUTE Cover Photo: Elderly women receive ABOUT THE AUTHOR emergency food aid, Agok, Sudan, May 21, 2008. ©UN Photo/Tim GILBERT KHADIAGALA is Jan Smuts Professor of McKulka. International Relations and Head of Department, The views expressed in this paper University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South represent those of the author and Africa. He is the co-author with Ruth Iyob of Sudan: The not necessarily those of IPI. IPI Elusive Quest for Peace (Lynne Rienner 2006) and the welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit editor of Security Dynamics in Africa’s Great Lakes of a well-informed debate on critical Region (Lynne Rienner 2006). policies and issues in international affairs. Africa Program Staff ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS John L. Hirsch, Senior Adviser IPI owes a great debt of thanks to the generous contrib- Mashood Issaka, Senior Program Officer utors to the Africa Program. Their support reflects a widespread demand for innovative thinking on practical IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Editor solutions to continental challenges. In particular, IPI and Ellie B. Hearne, Publications Officer the Africa Program are grateful to the government of the Netherlands. In addition we would like to thank the Kofi © by International Peace Institute, 2008 Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre, which All Rights Reserved co-hosted an authors' workshop for this working paper series in Accra, Ghana on April 11-12, 2008. www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Foreword, Terje Rød-Larsen . i Introduction. 1 Key Challenges .
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used to Treat Infectious Diseases Sheila Mgole Maregesi A,B,∗, Olipa David Ngassapa A, Luc Pieters B, Arnold J
    Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113 (2007) 457–470 Ethnopharmacological survey of the Bunda district, Tanzania: Plants used to treat infectious diseases Sheila Mgole Maregesi a,b,∗, Olipa David Ngassapa a, Luc Pieters b, Arnold J. Vlietinck b a Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania b Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium Received 8 February 2007; received in revised form 29 May 2007; accepted 1 July 2007 Available online 10 July 2007 Abstract An ethnobotanical study was carried out in six villages in the Bunda district, Mara Region, Tanzania, where the use of plants still has a special meaning to the society, in the treatment of various diseases. Information was obtained from the traditional healers and other experienced persons, having some knowledge on medicinal plants. Fifty-two plants were reported for use in the treatment of various infectious diseases. These plants belong to 29 families, with Papilionaceae being the most represented. Leaves ranked the highest, especially for use in topical preparations. Oral administration was the most frequently used route of administration. Twenty-one percent of the recorded plants were reported for treating venereal diseases, with syphilis and gonorrhea being the most commonly mentioned. Information providers requested feedback with regard to the plants proven scientifically to be toxic in order to avoid risks while offering their services. From this work it was found out that, people in this area commonly use medicinal plants with trust they have built on the curative outcome witnessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: a Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S
    United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Measuring Access to Food Service Economic in Tanzania: A Food Basket Information Bulletin Number 135 Approach February 2015 Nancy Cochrane and Anna D’Souza United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service www.ers.usda.gov Access this report online: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 Download the charts contained in this report: • Go to the report’s index page www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib135 • Click on the bulleted item “Download eib135.zip” • Open the chart you want, then save it to your computer Recommended citation format for this publication: Cochrane, Nancy, and Anna D’Souza. Measuring Access to Food in Tanzania: A Food Basket Approach, EIB-135, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, February 2015. Cover images: Nancy Cochrane, USDA, Economic Research Service. Use of commercial and trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorsement by USDA. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Musoma Municipal Council State of the Environment
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE – REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT MUSOMA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2016 1 | State of Environment R e p o r t - M u s o m a M . C 2016 Published by the Municipal Directors’ Office, Department of Environment, Musoma Municipal Council, Mara Region, United Republic of Tanzania, 2016. Copyright @2016 Department of Environment, Municipal Director’s Office This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Municipal Director’s Office would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Prepared by: Fikiri S. Kenyela Municipal Environment Management Officer Musoma Municipal Council Contacts: 0764646640/0759923615 For further information, please contact: Department of Environment, Municipal Director’s Office, P.O. Box 194, MUSOMA. TANZANIA. E-mail: [email protected] Fax No. 028-2620550 Tell No. 028-2622208/2622550 2 | State of Environment R e p o r t - M u s o m a M . C 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................ 7 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project/Programme Proposal to the Adaptation Fund
    PROJECT /PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION Project/Programme Category: Regular Project Country/ies: United Republic of Tanzania Title of Project/Programme: Bunda Climate Resilience and Adaptation Project Type of Implementing Entity: National Implementing Entity (NIE) Implementing Entity: National Environment Management Council (NEMC) Executing Entity/ies: Bunda District Council Amount of Financing Requested: 1,400,000 (In U.S Dollars Equivalent) 1.0 Project Background and Context 1.1 Brief background on what the project aims to solve Bunda district represents the section of poor rural communities of Mara region in the Lake Victoria Zone of Tanzania, who are already vulnerable to impacts of climate change1. Key climate elements like temperature, rainfall and wind speed have been shifting their historical trends and magnitudes over time. As a result, extreme climate and weather driven events such as droughts, prolonged dry periods, erratic rainfall and strong winds are more common across the district nowadays2. The observed climate vagaries coupled with high poverty level have already caused their toll to people, their socio-economic, livelihood and environmental systems. Crop failures, water scarcity and livestock deaths due to drought are already common events in the area. Rainfall seasons and number of rainy days has greatly changed and declined, affecting economic, social, environment and peoples’ livelihoods. Communities are experiencing failures of their traditional livelihood systems with no replacement or alternatives3. Dependence on fishing is also under threat due to catch decrease. As a result, the Poverty and Human Development Report released in 2005 by the United Republic of Tanzania ranked the district as the poorest with the highest rates of income poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2016/17 – 2020/21) Accelerating a People-Centered and Market-Driven Integration Foreword
    East African Community EAC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2016/17 – 2020/21) Accelerating a People-centered and Market-driven Integration Foreword The 5th EAC Development Strategy for the period 2016117-2020/21 outlines the broad strategic development objectives that the Community will pursue during the next five years in line with the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community and the EAC Vision 2050. Formulation of the Strategy has taken into account the obligations of the Community within the development frameworks at intra and inter-regional, continental and global levels (EAC Partner States, COMESA, SADC, AU Agenda 2063 and the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda). The overall goal of the 5th EAC Development Strategy is to build a firm foundation for transforming the East African Community into a stable, competitive and sustainable lower-middle income region by 2021. To realise this goal, the Community shall focus on seven (7) key priority areas, namely i) consolidation of the Single Customs Territory (SCT); ii) development of regional infrastructure; iii)enhancement of free movement of all factors of production as envisaged under the Common Market and Monetary Union Protocols; iv) enhancement of regional industrial development; v) improvement of agricultural productivity; vi) promotion of regional peace, security and good governance; and vii) institutional transformation at the regional and Partner State levels. The Community shall therefore devote to the pursuit of programs, projects and other interventions aimed at accelerating a people­ centred and market-driven integration that will also facilitate faster and more sustainable socio­ economic development and transformation of the EAC region. On behalf of the Summit of EAC Heads of State, I appreciate and applaud the good work that has been undertaken by the Organs and Institutions of the Community in producing this Development Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Assessment of the Mcgovern-Dole Food for Education (Ffe Iii) Programme Baseline Study Report
    AUGUST 31, 2017 BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF THE MCGOVERN-DOLE FOOD FOR EDUCATION (FFE III) PROGRAMME BASELINE STUDY REPORT SAMBODHI LIMITED (TANZANIA) 1st Floor, Acacia Estates Building, Kinondoni Road, Dar es Salaam Agreement Number: FFE-621-2016/011-00 0 Acknowledgement The baseline assessment of the Food For Education III (FFE III) programme commissioned by Project Concern International, Tanzania was conducted by Sambodhi Limited, Tanzania in association with Sambodhi, India. Sambodhi would like to acknowledge the valuable support and input provided by the PCI Tanzania team members including interalia, the Country Director, MLE Manager, Regional Operation Director, Programme Manager, Education Coordinator, Health Coordinator, Agriculture Coordinator, School Feeding Coordinator, WE Coordinator, whose guidance helped the study team gain a better understanding of the impact pathways of the project. The team members’ insight on functions, successes and challenges of the project activities helped us to identify gaps and enabled us to provide recommendations. Sambodhi would also like to extend its gratitude towards all the project partners and collaborators such as the District Planning Office and District Education Office for Musoma Rural, Butiama, Bunda and Serengeti districts, for giving us their valuable time and insights on the program. We are grateful to the President’s Office of Regional Administration (PORALG) and National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) for providing us with the permission letters to conduct the baseline assessment. We would also like to thank the district educational quality assurers for Musoma Rural, Butiama, Bunda and Serengeti districts for their contribution to the baseline assessment. Lastly, the study would not have been possible without the tremendous effort of the study team members and field enumerators who did an excellent job in collecting all the required information and meeting the deadlines.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investment Guide to the East African Community
    UNITED NATIONS International Chamber of Commerce The world business organization AN INVESTMENT GUIDE TO THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY Opportunities and conditions July 2005 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2005 ii UNCTAD The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was established in 1964 as a per- manent intergovernmental body. Its main goals are to maximize the trade, investment and development opportunities of developing countries, to help them face challenges arising from globalization, and to help them integrate into the world economy on an equitable basis. UNCTAD’s membership comprises 192 States. Its secretariat is located in Geneva, Switzerland, and forms part of the United Nations Secretariat. ICC The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) is the world business organization. It is the only body that speaks with authority on behalf of enterprises from all sectors in every part of the world, grouping together thousands of members, companies and associations from 130 countries. ICC promotes an open international trade and investment system and the market economy in the context of sustainable growth and development. It makes rules that govern the conduct of business across borders. Within a year of the creation of the United Nations it was granted consultative status at the highest level (category A) with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. This is now known as General Category consulta- tive status. Notes The term “country” as used in this study also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas; the designa- tions employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatso- ever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania: Floods in Mara Region
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Tanzania: Floods in Mara Region DREF n°: MDRTZ025 / PTZ041 Glide n°: FL-2019-000145-TZA Expected timeframe: 3 months Date of issue: 15 November 2019 Expected end date: 15 February 2020 IFRC Focal point responsible for this operation: Andreas National Society focal point responsible for this SANDIN, East Africa Country Cluster Support Team operation: Mr. Renatus Mkaruka, Director Disaster (EACCST) Operations Coordinator. Management. Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 83,430 Total number of people affected: 1,113 people Number of people to be assisted: 835 people (208 households) Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 10 staff, 4 from head quarter and 6 form Mwanza and Mara regions, were deployed in the aftermath of the flood disaster in Mara region, this is in addition of 50 volunteers, 25 from Mara (Rorya district) and 25 from Musoma Rural branches. 20 additional volunteers are available to be deployed. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: Belgian Red Cross Society-Flanders and the IFRC. The ICRC and Spanish Red Cross kept informed about the situation. Other partner organisations actively involved in the operation: Government of Tanzania, and specifically Local Government Authorities including the Regional Administrative Commissioner (RAS), the District Administrative Commissioners and the Prime Minister’s office (Disaster Management Department). No International Non-Governmental
    [Show full text]