DOCSLIB.ORG

Baseline Assessment of the Mcgovern-Dole Food for Education (Ffe Iii) Programme Baseline Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baseline Assessment of the Mcgovern-Dole Food for Education (Ffe Iii) Programme Baseline Study Report AUGUST 31, 2017 BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF THE MCGOVERN-DOLE FOOD FOR EDUCATION (FFE III) PROGRAMME BASELINE STUDY REPORT SAMBODHI LIMITED (TANZANIA) 1st Floor, Acacia Estates Building, Kinondoni Road, Dar es Salaam Agreement Number: FFE-621-2016/011-00 0 Acknowledgement The baseline assessment of the Food For Education III (FFE III) programme commissioned by Project Concern International, Tanzania was conducted by Sambodhi Limited, Tanzania in association with Sambodhi, India. Sambodhi would like to acknowledge the valuable support and input provided by the PCI Tanzania team members including interalia, the Country Director, MLE Manager, Regional Operation Director, Programme Manager, Education Coordinator, Health Coordinator, Agriculture Coordinator, School Feeding Coordinator, WE Coordinator, whose guidance helped the study team gain a better understanding of the impact pathways of the project. The team members’ insight on functions, successes and challenges of the project activities helped us to identify gaps and enabled us to provide recommendations. Sambodhi would also like to extend its gratitude towards all the project partners and collaborators such as the District Planning Office and District Education Office for Musoma Rural, Butiama, Bunda and Serengeti districts, for giving us their valuable time and insights on the program. We are grateful to the President’s Office of Regional Administration (PORALG) and National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) for providing us with the permission letters to conduct the baseline assessment. We would also like to thank the district educational quality assurers for Musoma Rural, Butiama, Bunda and Serengeti districts for their contribution to the baseline assessment. Lastly, the study would not have been possible without the tremendous effort of the study team members and field enumerators who did an excellent job in collecting all the required information and meeting the deadlines. 1 Disclaimer The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of Project Concern International or the United States Government. 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. About McGovern-Dole Food For Education Programme ..................................................... 11 1.2. Baseline study scope and methodology ................................................................................ 11 1.3. Key results ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.4. Relevance and performance .................................................................................................. 14 1.5. Sustainability readiness ......................................................................................................... 16 1.6. Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 18 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 19 2.1. Background on the FFE III programme ................................................................................ 19 2.2. Key components of the FFE III programme ......................................................................... 19 3. Baseline Study Methodology ........................................................................................................ 22 4. Limitations and Considerations .................................................................................................... 23 5. Review of Literature ..................................................................................................................... 23 5.1. Profile of Mara region ........................................................................................................... 23 5.2. Education policy in Tanzania ................................................................................................ 24 5.3. Review of FFE programme interventions in secondary literature ........................................ 25 6. Baseline Findings .......................................................................................................................... 26 6.1. Early Grade Reading Assessment results .............................................................................. 26 6.2. EGRA: Sub-task 1 – Phonetic Awareness ............................................................................ 28 6.3. EGRA Sub-Task 2 – Letter Sound Knowledge .................................................................... 28 6.4. EGRA Sub-Task 3 – Devised Word Identification ............................................................... 29 6.5. EGRA Sub-Task 4 – Oral Passage Reading ......................................................................... 31 6.6. EGRA Sub-Task 5 – Reading Comprehension ..................................................................... 31 6.7. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of EGRA scores ........................................................... 32 6.8. Correlation analysis for EGRA scores .................................................................................. 33 6.9. Analyzing factors affecting EGRA scores ............................................................................ 33 6.10. Regression analysis on overall EGRA scores ................................................................... 39 6.11. Key takeaways from EGRA results .................................................................................. 40 7. Student Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Health, Hygiene and Nutrition .......................... 40 7.1. Student awareness of good dietary practices ........................................................................ 40 7.2. Student dietary practices ....................................................................................................... 41 7.3. Variables associated with improved Minimum Acceptable Diet .......................................... 42 7.4. Student health and hygiene awareness and practice ............................................................. 43 7.5. Student attendance ................................................................................................................ 46 8. Household Socio-Economic Conditions ....................................................................................... 46 8.1. Household socio-economic conditions for female members ................................................ 48 9. Parent knowledge and practice of health, hygiene and nutrition behaviours ................................ 48 3 9.1. Parent knowledge and practice on health and hygiene behaviours ....................................... 48 9.2. Parent knowledge and practice on nutrition behaviours ....................................................... 49 9.3. Parent support for school-provided meal programs .............................................................. 49 9.4. Parent-reported student absences due to illness .................................................................... 49 9.5. Parental monitoring and engagement .................................................................................... 50 9.6. Parental perception toward primary education through a gender lens .................................. 50 10. Teaching environment and approaches in schools ........................................................................ 51 10.1. Teacher background and experience ................................................................................. 51 10.2. Teacher attendance ............................................................................................................ 52 10.3. Teaching methodologies ................................................................................................... 52 11. Teachers’ Awareness of Health, Hygiene and Nutrition Practices ............................................... 54 12. Head Teacher Experience, Training and Performance.................................................................. 54 12.1. School management by head teachers............................................................................... 54 12.2. Head teacher leadership and involvement ......................................................................... 55 13. Direct Classroom Teaching Observations ..................................................................................... 57 13.1. Classroom organization ..................................................................................................... 57 13.2. Instructional content .......................................................................................................... 57 13.3. Class activities .................................................................................................................. 58 13.4. Teaching methods ............................................................................................................. 58 13.5. Teaching assessment methods .......................................................................................... 59 13.6. Teaching materials ............................................................................................................ 60 14. School Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FP Allocation in 3 Districts Mara
    HEALTH PROMOTION TANZANIA (HDT) Three Rural Districts Allocate $20,700 for Family Planning in Tanzania Three rural districts in Mara Region of Tanzania with lowest contraceptive prevalence rates in the country have made budget allocations for family planning totaling US $20,700. This results from advocacy that was led by local Advance Family Planning partner Health Promotion Tanzania (HDT) in Serengeti District and Tarime Town Councils who allocated fund from their own sources for the first time while Musoma Rural District Council surpassing double their family planning allocation from the previous year (2014/15). The district-level engagement resulted in commitments for family planning budget allocations which were approved during the parliamentary budget session of May-June 2015. Approximately $10,588 from Serengeti District Council, $7,647 from Musoma Rural District Council, and $2,529 from Tarime Town Council were approved. HDT engaged in the three district level advocacy through a series of activities that began in August 2014. They first collaborated with technical teams in the district medical offices to conduct needs assessment across the focus districts to establish evidence for family planning needs and develop messaging. In September, HDT met with district council AFP team in discussion with DMOs of seven Disricts from leadership to prioritize investment in Mara Region family planning through meetings with District Planning Officers and Secretaries to the District Councils and presenting proposals to the Council Committees for Social Services. HDT also organized a regional meeting bringing together all districts in the region to present data from the three focus districts and engage health team members to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Project/Programme Proposal to the Adaptation Fund
    PROJECT /PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION Project/Programme Category: Regular Project Country/ies: United Republic of Tanzania Title of Project/Programme: Bunda Climate Resilience and Adaptation Project Type of Implementing Entity: National Implementing Entity (NIE) Implementing Entity: National Environment Management Council (NEMC) Executing Entity/ies: Bunda District Council Amount of Financing Requested: 1,400,000 (In U.S Dollars Equivalent) 1.0 Project Background and Context 1.1 Brief background on what the project aims to solve Bunda district represents the section of poor rural communities of Mara region in the Lake Victoria Zone of Tanzania, who are already vulnerable to impacts of climate change1. Key climate elements like temperature, rainfall and wind speed have been shifting their historical trends and magnitudes over time. As a result, extreme climate and weather driven events such as droughts, prolonged dry periods, erratic rainfall and strong winds are more common across the district nowadays2. The observed climate vagaries coupled with high poverty level have already caused their toll to people, their socio-economic, livelihood and environmental systems. Crop failures, water scarcity and livestock deaths due to drought are already common events in the area. Rainfall seasons and number of rainy days has greatly changed and declined, affecting economic, social, environment and peoples’ livelihoods. Communities are experiencing failures of their traditional livelihood systems with no replacement or alternatives3. Dependence on fishing is also under threat due to catch decrease. As a result, the Poverty and Human Development Report released in 2005 by the United Republic of Tanzania ranked the district as the poorest with the highest rates of income poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania: Floods in Mara Region
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Tanzania: Floods in Mara Region DREF n°: MDRTZ025 / PTZ041 Glide n°: FL-2019-000145-TZA Expected timeframe: 3 months Date of issue: 15 November 2019 Expected end date: 15 February 2020 IFRC Focal point responsible for this operation: Andreas National Society focal point responsible for this SANDIN, East Africa Country Cluster Support Team operation: Mr. Renatus Mkaruka, Director Disaster (EACCST) Operations Coordinator. Management. Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 83,430 Total number of people affected: 1,113 people Number of people to be assisted: 835 people (208 households) Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 10 staff, 4 from head quarter and 6 form Mwanza and Mara regions, were deployed in the aftermath of the flood disaster in Mara region, this is in addition of 50 volunteers, 25 from Mara (Rorya district) and 25 from Musoma Rural branches. 20 additional volunteers are available to be deployed. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: Belgian Red Cross Society-Flanders and the IFRC. The ICRC and Spanish Red Cross kept informed about the situation. Other partner organisations actively involved in the operation: Government of Tanzania, and specifically Local Government Authorities including the Regional Administrative Commissioner (RAS), the District Administrative Commissioners and the Prime Minister’s office (Disaster Management Department). No International Non-Governmental
    [Show full text]
  • Mara Monograph.Pdf (5.501Mb)
    NILE BASIN INITIATIVE NILE EQUATORIAL LAKES SUBSIDIARY ACTION PROGRAM Mara River Basin Transboundary Integrated Water Resources Management and Development Project Mara River Basin Monograph Final Report Water Resources and Energy Management (WREM) International Inc. December 2008 WREM International Acknowledgements WREM International wishes to thank Joseph K. Terer, Manager of the Mara River Basin Project Management Unit (PMU), and Engineer Emmanuel Olet, NELSAP Program Officer for Water Resources Management, for their cooperation, responsive technical support, and commitment to the project success. We also wish to thank the members of the Regional Project Steering Committee for their project oversight and guidance. Ms. Katherine Kishiki, PMU Finance Officer, and Mr. Omari R. Mwinjaka, PMU Project Officer, provided excellent logistical support and facilitation of our project team. We are grateful to Mr. Sven Jacobi of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) for his comprehensive, forward-looking, pragmatic, and constructive project reviews, comments, and guidance. Lastly, we wish to thank the staff of the Mara River Basin districts (Nakuru (Molo), Bomet, Narok, Transmara, Serengeti, Tarime, and Musoma Rural) for their cooperation, welcoming and informative discussions, and valuable project contributions. Our project approach was to leverage their knowledge and understanding of local issues, challenges, and opportunities, and develop relevant and shared recommendations and proposals. We hope that these recommendations will indeed come to life and help preserve the wonder of the Mara River Basin. Atlanta, December 2008 Dr. Aris P. Georgakakos Mara TIWRMD Project Director President WREM International Inc. Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology Intellectual Property and Copyright Notice This document was prepared by WREM International Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mara Region in Tanzania
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/20753 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Chirangi, Musuto Mutaragara Title: Afya Jumuishi : towards interprofessional collaboration between traditional and modern medical practitioners in the Mara Region of Tanzania Issue Date: 2013-04-17 CHAPTER IV RESEARCH SETTING: THE MARA REGION IN TANZANIA 4.1 Tanzania: A Developing Country at a Glance In this chapter, an overview of Tanzania and the Mara Region as the research area is presented. The first part covers the country’s geography, and the historical and political background, followed by the nation’s general health status presented by the current health indicators. Further, the Tanzanian medical system is explored with historical health services charting from the pre-colonial, colonial and post-independent Tanzania. The Mara Region’s sociography is described with emphasis on geo-ecological factors, socio-demographic and an economic profile of the region. Lastly, the chapter embarks on underscoring the sample population profile of this study, including the medical practitioners from both traditional and modern medical systems in Mara Region of Tanzania. The traditional medical systems, life style and cultural attributes of the research setting are given in the proceeding Chapter V. 4.1.1 Geography and Historical Background Tanzania is located in East Africa with a total area of approximately 943,000 sq km of which 2,640 sq km is the Zanzibar archipelago (Map 4.1). The largest part consists of the central highland plateau lying between the eastern and western branches of the Great Lift Valley. The north-eastern part and the southern highlands have the main mountain ranges where Mount Kilimanjaro, the highest mountain in Africa (5,896m), can be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children 2 Mara Region Case Study Report
    The United Republic of Global Initiative on Tanzania Out-of-School Children Ministry of Education Science and Technology TANZANIA MARA REGION CASE STUDY REPORT MARCH 2018 Acknowledgment 1 Acknowledgement The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MOEST) and UNICEF would like to express gratitude to Muhammad Q Hasan PhD, the UNICEF consultant for this Out- of-School Study and his co-worker Dr Jie Zhang, former Lecturer of University of Essex and a former UNICEF consultant, for their strong technical knowledge and analytical skills in bringing to light the profiles, barriers, bottlenecks and policy issues affecting children and adolescents out of school. Muhammad Hasan is also acknowledged for the technical support that he provided to Dar es Salaam University College of Education in the conduct of the Case study in Mara Region and qualitative assessment of the out-of-school children. Dar es Salaam University College of Education was responsible for the qualitative assessment of the out-of-school children and conduct of the case study in Mara to assess the social cultural practices that keep children out of school. Thus, immense gratitude is also due to the research team from the Dar es Salaam University College of Education (DUCE) namely, Professor Sam Magimbi, Professor Maurice Mbago, Dr Consolata Chua, Dr Christina Raphael, Dr Julius Mngumi and Mr Rodrick Ndomba, who led the qualitative component of the study in seven regions supported by the international consultant with whom the team interacted on a continuous basis. This interaction not only reinforced national capacities but also helped us to understand some of the complex contextual issues affecting out-of-school children in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevention of Water Born Diseases in Tegeruka Ward, Musoma Rural District, Tanzania
    FINAL REPORT Final Evaluation of the project: Prevention of water born diseases in Tegeruka Ward, Musoma rural district, Tanzania ENG.FRANCIS M.A. MTITU MEng Management, BsC Environmental Engineering Registered Professional Engineer (T). P. Eng Nº 3041 Conducted by: Albino Kalolo , Francis Mtitu & Yeronimo Mlawa For AMREF, Tanzania CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF ABREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 7 1.0 Background information .................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Project objectives ............................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Objectives of the final evaluation .................................................................................... 8 1.4 Evaluation Methodology ................................................................................................. 9 CHAPTER THREE: DISCUSSION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania 2002/2003 Mara
    United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE 2002/2003 Volume Vt: REGIONAL REPORT: National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development, Ministry of Cooperatives and Marketing, Presidents Office, Regional Administration and Local Government December 2007 United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE 2002/2003 VOLUME Vt: REGIONAL REPORT:MARA REGION National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of agriculture and Food Security, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development, Ministry of Cooperatives and Marketing, Presidents Office, Regional Administration and Local Government, Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs – Zanzibar December 2007 TOC i ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... i Abbreviations............................................................................................................................................................... v Preface.......................................................................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BUNDA TOWN November 2008
    United Nations Human Settlements Programme UN-HABITAT LAKE VICTORIA REGION WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAMME APPRAISAL REPORT BUNDA TOWN November 2008 UN-HABITAT – LVWATSAN Bunda Appraisal Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BUNDA TOWN PROFILE............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BUNDA DISTRICT ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 BUNDA TOWN COUNCIL.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 BUNDA URBAN WATER SUPPLY ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 POPULATION ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 VULNERABLE GROUPS................................................................................................................................2 2 RESULTS OF THE URBAN INEQUITY SURVEY IN BUNDA................................................................. 3 2.1 URBAN INEQUITY SURVEY (UIS)................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 PRESENTATION OF THE UIS SURVEY, AVAILABILITY OF RESULTS FOR BUNDA .......................................... 3 2.3 SOME OF THE UIS RESULTS HIGHLIGHTED ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Mapping of Land Use/Cover and Erosion Hazard in Lake Victoria Basin
    Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project (LVEMP) Survey and Mapping of Land Use/Cover and Erosion Hazard in Lake Victoria Basin Final Report November 2001 Regional/National Secretariat P.O. Box 78089 Dar es Salaam Table of Contents Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... III 2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ....................................................................... 3 2.1 Bio-physical aspects ........................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Sources of Data........................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Interpretation of Satellite Image Maps ...................................................... 4 2.1.3 Field Verification......................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Digitization .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.5 Assessment of Erosion Hazard by Overlay Method .................................. 5 2.1.5.1 Slope Characteristics.............................................................................. 5 2.1.5.2 Rainfall Erosivity.................................................................................... 6 2.1.5.3 Soil Erodibility ....................................................................................... 6 2.1.5.4 Land cover/use types .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project/Programme Proposal to The
    PROJECT /PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION Project/Programme Category: Regular Project Country/ies: United Republic of Tanzania Title of Project/Programme: Bunda Climate Resilience and Adaptation Project Type of Implementing Entity: National Implementing Entity (NIE) Implementing Entity: National Environment Management Council (NEMC) Executing Entity/ies: Bunda District Council Amount of Financing Requested: 1,400,000 (In U.S Dollars Equivalent) 1.0 Project Background and Context 1.1 Brief background on what the project aims to solve Bunda district represents the section of poor rural communities of Mara region in the Lake Victoria Zone of Tanzania, who are already vulnerable to impacts of climate change1. Key climate elements like temperature, rainfall and wind speed have been shifting their historical trends and magnitudes over time. As a result, extreme climate and weather driven events such as droughts, prolonged dry periods, erratic rainfall and strong winds are more common across the district nowadays2. The observed climate vagaries coupled with high poverty level have already caused their toll to people, their socio-economic, livelihood and environmental systems. Crop failures, water scarcity and livestock deaths due to drought are already common events in the area. Rainfall seasons and number of rainy days has greatly changed and declined, affecting economic, social, environment and peoples’ livelihoods. Communities are experiencing failures of their traditional livelihood systems with no replacement or alternatives3. Dependence on fishing is also under threat due to catch decrease. As a result, the Poverty and Human Development Report released in 2005 by the United Republic of Tanzania ranked the district as the poorest with the highest rates of income poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Adaptation to Climate Change for Cassava Farming in Musoma, Rural District, Tanzania
    International Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 2016, 5(1): 52-65 International Journal of Modern Social Sciences ISSN: 2169-9917 Journal homepage: www.ModernScientificPress.com/Journals/IJMSS.aspx Florida, USA Article Challenges of Adaptation to Climate Change for Cassava Farming in Musoma, Rural District, Tanzania Ahmad Kanyama1 and Josiah John 2,* 1Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Dodoma, P.O. Box 395, Dodoma 2 Department of Education, Musoma Municipality, P.O Box, 731, Musoma * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected] Article history: Received 16 January 2016, Received in revised form 25 March 2016, Accepted 2 April 2016, Published 8 April 2016. Abstract: This paper examines the challenges of adaptation to climate change and variability for cassava farming in Musoma, Rural District. Specifically the paper examines (i) the perception of households and key informants on the rainfall and temperature variability in the study area, (ii) the impact of rainfall and temperature variability on cassava production, (iii) coping strategies to improve cassava yields and (iv) challenges faced in adapting to climate change and variability. Data collection methods included literature review, household questionnaire survey, key informants interviews, focus group interviews and participant observations. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and content analysis techniques was used in the analysis and processing of quantitative and qualitative data. The findings showed that there was rainfall and temperature variability in the form of decreasing rainfall trend and increasing temperature trend. This led to decreased cassava yields which affected livelihoods of the farmers. Farmers applied different agricultural adaptation measure to cope with decreased cassava yields, however, results were poor due to several challenges like poor implementation of policies and lack of adequate climate change policies to combat drought.
    [Show full text]