DOCSLIB.ORG

Jesuit Interpretations of Marvellous Births

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

226 Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Jesuit Interpretations of Marvellous Births Nos voyageurs missionnaires rapportent, avec candeur, que lorsqu’ils parlèrent au sage empereur Kangxi des variations considérables de la chrono logie de la Vulgate, des Septante, et des Samaritains, Kangxi leur répondit : « Est-il possible que les livres en qui vous croyez se com- battent ? » Voltaire, La Philosophie de l’histoire (1969), p. 153. Our missionary travelers relate, with candour, that, when they spoke to that sage emperor, Kangxi, of the great chronological variations of the Vulgate, of the Septuagint, and of the Samaritans, Kangxi asked them, if it were [really] possible, that the books in which they believed, contra- dicted each other? Voltaire, The Philosophy of History (1829), p. 107. ⸪ Introduction The fourth chapter shifts the focus from conversations between texts within Chinese language and culture to the transfer of these conversations to and between texts of European languages and cultures. More concretely, various interpretations by Jesuit missionaries of the historical texts on marvellous births mentioned by the Chinese classics will be discussed in order to investi- gate some characteristics of intercultural hermeneutics. It will be shown that this transfer was to a large extent shaped by the interpretations that were made by Chinese commentators before the transfer. Moreover it will become clear that the diversity of Chinese interpretations was echoed in a diversity of Jesuit interpretations. Regarding this diversity of Jesuit interpretations, Virgile Pinot proposes in his major study La Chine et la formation de l’esprit philosophique en France (1640–1740), a very useful thematic and subsequently regional distinction between the French Jesuits who were studying China’s ancient past: one group consisted of those who believed in the antiquity of China as a nation © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2016 | doi 10.1163/9789004316225_008 Jesuit Interpretations of Marvellous Births 227 (Dominique Parrenin, Jean-Baptiste Régis, Joseph-Anne-Marie de Moyriac de Mailla, Alexandre de La Charme and Antoine Gaubil) and those who did not (Joachim Bouvet, Joseph de de Prémare, and to a certain extent Jean-François Foucquet).1 After the death of the Kangxi emperor and the subsequent expul- sion of 1724, the first group could remain in Beijing, while the other, with the exception of Bouvet, had to move to Canton and Macao. That is why Pinot calls the former the “Beijing” group and the latter the “Canton” group. At times there was a good deal of (personal) animosity between them, including some of their superiors, though they did not write as extensively on these topics as the main participants in the discussions. The divisions received then the labels of the French regions of Lyons and Paris, with Vincent de Tartre and François-Xavier Dentrecolles as the “Lyonnais” opposed to Joachim Bouvet and Jean-François Foucquet belonging to the Parisian group.2 These geographic delineations can only function as a metaphor, because they are not entirely correct. Bouvet, for instance, never left Beijing, while Foucquet had to leave China before 1724.3 Moreover, there were also differences within the different groups. Still, in this essay we will often use the terms “Beijing” and “Canton” group to delineate two major approaches in historiographical writing by Jesuits missionaries in China. Both groups aimed at promoting the diffusion of Christianity in the best possible way, and both were of the opinion that the best way to do that was to show the Chinese that the Judaic traditions could be accepted by them and that the books of Moses were not in contradiction with the canonical writings of China. There was, however, a major difference in their attitude towards the Chinese past. The “Beijing” group accepted ancient Chinese history, as it was established by tradition, and tried to insert the history of China into the gen- eral history of humanity, as reported by the Bible. The “Canton” group denied that one could find the earliest history of China in the canonical writings of China. They considered these writings books containing “symbols” and there- fore they were rather searching for the traces of the first humans and the announcement of a Messiah in these Chinese texts. Therefore regarding their methods, the former are called by Pinot “Historians,” the latter “symbolist theo- logians,” or “Figurists.”4 In this essay the same labels will be adopted. Virgile Pinot also refers to a third group: the Jesuits in Paris, who never went to China but edited the works of the French Jesuits. As already shown in chap- ter two regarding Jean-Baptiste Du Halde’s modification in “Fastes de la 1 Pinot (1932), pp. 251–252. 2 Rule (1986). 3 See critical remarks by Witek (1982), pp. 333–334. 4 Pinot (1932), pp. 149, 251–252..
Recommended publications
  • The Jesuits and Chinese Science*

    The Jesuits and Chinese Science*

    The Jesuits and Chinese Science* Chicheng Ma† June 2019 Abstract: Based on the historical context of the Jesuit mission to China from 1580, this paper examines the role of knowledge diffusion in scientific production. To facilitate their China mission, the Jesuits introduced European sciences to Chinese cultural elites—the Confucian literati. This stimulated the literati toward scientific research. In places where the Jesuits diffused European sciences, the number of Chinese scientific works increased significantly. But this effect disappeared after the Pope dismissed the Jesuit mission in 1773. The finding questions the conventional wisdom that the Confucian literati of imperial China disparaged science, and demonstrates the importance of opening to knowledge flow in scientific progress. Keywords: Jesuit mission; Science; Knowledge Diffusion; Elites; Human Capital; China JEL Codes: N35; N75; O15; O33; Z12 * Preliminary draft. I thank Ying Bai, Zhiwu Chen, Jeremiah Dittmar, Ruixue Jia, James Kung, Jin Li, Luigi Pascali, Kaixiang Peng, Felipe Valencia Caicedo, Lingwei Wu, Noam Yuchtman, and the seminar participants at the National University of Singapore, Lingnan University, Hong Kong Baptist University, Jinan University, Peking University, Sun Yat-sen University, Fudan University, Shandong University, Economic History Workshop (HKU), and The Sixth Asian Historical Economics Conference for helpful comments. Xinhao Li, Xinran Liu, Xinning Ren and Xiaofan Zhu provided excellent research assistance. I am also grateful to Hong Kong Research Grants Council and The University of Hong Kong for generous financial support. The remaining errors are mine. † Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]. 1 1. Introduction Thanks to the missionary expansion of the Jesuits, European sciences were introduced to imperial China since 1580.
  • The “Beijing Experience” of Eighteenth-Century French Jesuits a Discussion Centered on Lettres Édifiantes Et Curieuses Écrites Des Missions Étrangères

    The “Beijing Experience” of Eighteenth-Century French Jesuits a Discussion Centered on Lettres Édifiantes Et Curieuses Écrites Des Missions Étrangères

    winter 2012–13 35 Chinese Studies in History, vol. 46, no. 2, Winter 2012–13, pp. 35–57. © 2013 M.E. Sharpe, Inc. All rights reserved. Permissions: www.copyright.com ISSN 0009–4633 (print)/ISSN 1558–0407 (online) DOI: 10.2753/CSH0009-4633460202 OU YA N G ZHESHENG The “Beijing Experience” of Eighteenth-Century French Jesuits A Discussion Centered on Lettres édifiantes et curieuses écrites des missions étrangères Abstract: Of the European Jesuit missionaries who went to China during the eighteenth century, the French Jesuits were a notable group. The Lettres édifiantes et curieuses écrites des missions étrangères (Edifying and Curious Letters Written from Foreign Missions), a collection of these missionaries’ correspondences, revealed how the Jesuits described their impression of the city Beijing and the imperial court, their religious activities, and their scientific works. These descriptions played a role in shaping the Europeans’ view of China, contributing to the rise of “chinoiserie” in eighteenth-century Europe. French Jesuits dominated the West’s “Beijing experience” during the eighteenth century. Whether in terms of the numbers of French Jesuits who came to China’s capital and the important roles they played there, or in terms of the weight carried by the historical English translation © 2013 M.E. Sharpe, Inc., from the Chinese text. “Shiba shiji Faguo Yasu huishi de Beijing jingyan: Yi Yesu huishi Zhongguo shujianji weizhongxin de taolun.” Translated by Carissa Fletcher. Ouyang Zhesheng is professor of history at Peking University. Notes renumbered for this edition.—Ed. 35 36 chINESE STUDIES IN HISTORY materials they passed down regarding the “Beijing experience,” the French Jesuits had a marked advantage over the other Western missionaries who came to Beijing.
  • Jesuit Medicine in the Kangxi Court (1662-1722): Imperial Networks and Patronage1

    Jesuit Medicine in the Kangxi Court (1662-1722): Imperial Networks and Patronage1

    EASTM 34 (2011): 86-162 Jesuit Medicine in the Kangxi Court (1662-1722): Imperial Networks and Patronage1 Beatriz Puente-Ballesteros [Beatriz Puente-Ballesteros, a Medical Doctor and Sinologist, obtained her PhD degree (European Degree) in the Department of History of Science at Complutense University of Madrid. Her thesis was honoured with the prize for the best doctorate of the Faculty of Medicine in the academic year 2008-2009 as well as with the prize “Hernández Morejón” for the best doctoral dissertation in the History of Medicine, granted by the Spanish Society for History of Medicine. Her research focuses on court medicine in late imperial China and medical exchange between China and Europe during the Kangxi period, especially the Jesuit physicians’ role at the court. From 2009 to 2012 she is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Sinology at the Faculty of Arts, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, with the financial support first of the University of Leuven and then of Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation. Currently she is working on the revision of her PhD thesis for publication. Contact: [email protected]] 1 This article is a revised version of one of the chapters of my PhD thesis “De París a Pekín, de Pekín a París: La Misión jesuita francesa como interlocutor médico en la China de la era Kangxi (r. 1662-1722)”, Tesis Doctoral con grado Europeo, Ciencias Sociosanitarias y Humanidades Médicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2009, section 2.1. This was a work carried out under the academic supervision of Prof. Catherine Jami (REHSEIS-UMR 7219 (CNRS & Université de Paris-Diderot)) and Prof.
  • USF Center for the Pacific Rim

    USF Center for the Pacific Rim

    Copyright 1988 -2007 USF Center for the Pacific Rim The Occasional Paper Series of the USF Center for the Pacific Rim :: www.pacificrim.usfca.edu Medicine and Culture Chinese-Western Medical Exchange (1644-ca.1950) Keynote Lecture by Marta E. Hanson, Ph.D. Symposium Summation by Charlotte Furth, Ph.D. The Ricci Institute at the USF Center for the Pacific Rim is pleased to publish two extracts from its March 2007 symposium, “Medicine and Culture: Chinese-Western Medical Exchange.” Marta Hanson's keynote lecture on the Jesuits' introduction of Western medical knowledge to China during the Qing dynasty drew an overflow crowd to the USF hilltop. Charlotte Furth's summation synthesized the works of 10 leading scholars and doctoral candidates who presented their research at the Institute's day-long symposium on Chinese-Western medical exchange held the following day. Marta E. Hanson, Ph.D. (right) is assistant professor in the Department of History of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. She has written articles on medical regionalism, gender and medicine, and Manchu medical sources in late imperial China. Charlotte Furth, Ph.D. (left) is professor of Chinese history at the University of Southern California. She has published numerous articles on topics related to the cultural studies of science and gender. Among her many publications is her book, A Flourishing Yin: Gender in China's Medical History, 960-1665 (UC Press, 1999). We gratefully acknowledge the EDS-Stewart Chair for Chinese-Western Cultural History and the Asian Scholars’ Endowment at the USF Ricci Institute for funding this issue of Pacific Rim Report.
  • In the Garden of the World. Italy to a Young 19Th Century Chinese Traveler, 2020 Miriam Castorina

    In the Garden of the World. Italy to a Young 19Th Century Chinese Traveler, 2020 Miriam Castorina

    Miriam Castorina FIRENZE UNIVERSITY Miriam Castorina PRESS In the garden of world In the garden of the world Italy to a young 19th century Chinese traveler FUP STUDI E SAGGI ISSN 2704-6478 (PRINT) | ISSN 2704-5919 (ONLINE) – 206 – FLORIENTALIA ASIAN STUDIES SERIES – UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE Editor-in-Chief Pedone Valentina, University of Florence, Italy Sagiyama Ikuko, University of Florence, Italy Scientific Board Bianchi Ester, University of Perugia, Italy Brezzi Alessandra, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy De Troia Paolo, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy Del Bene Marco, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy Fujiwara Katsumi, Osaka University, Japan Hyodo Hiromi, Gakushuin University, Japan Klöter Henning, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany Li-Chia Liu Jennifer, Harvard University, United States Masini Federico, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy Nagashima Hiroaki, University of Nishogakusha, Japan Romagnoli Chiara, Roma Tre University, Italy Ruperti Bonaventura, University of Venice Ca’ Foscari, Italy Stirpe Luca, Gabriele d’Annunzio University, Italy Tada Kazuomi, University of Tokyo, Japan Tomasi Massimiliano, Western Washington University, United States Yongming Zhou, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States Zuccheri Serena, University of Bologna, Italy Published Titles Valentina Pedone, A Journey to the West. Observations on the Chinese Migration to Italy, 2013 Edoardo Gerlini, The Heian Court Poetry as World Literature. From the Point of View of Early Italian Poetry, 2014 Ikuko Sagiyama, Valentina Pedone (edited by), Perspectives on East Asia, 2014 Ikuko Sagiyama, Valentina Pedone (edited by), Transcending Borders. Selected papers in East Asian studies, 2016 Ikuko Sagiyama, Miriam Castorina (edited by), Trajectories. Selected papers in East Asian studies 軌跡, 2019 Miriam Castorina, In the garden of the world.
  • The First Global Turn: Chinese Contributions to Enlightenment World History

    The First Global Turn: Chinese Contributions to Enlightenment World History

    The First Global Turn: Chinese Contributions to Enlightenment World History Alexander Statman Journal of World History, Volume 30, Number 3, September 2019, pp. 363-392 (Article) Published by University of Hawai'i Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/734752 Access provided at 1 Oct 2019 16:06 GMT from University of Wisconsin @ Madison The First Global Turn: Chinese Contributions to Enlightenment World History ALEXANDER STATMAN The Huntington Library THE FIRST GLOBAL TURN In the middle of the eighteenth century, Enlightenment historiography underwent what might be called the first global turn. European historians devised a new program for world history, drawing diverse local histories together to treat the world as an interconnected whole. Enlightenment world history took many forms, as Jennifer Pitts has shown. Conjectural history, developed in Scotland, formulated universal models of historical development through stages of civilization. Commercial histories, pioneered in France, uncovered the economic links that drew different partsoftheworldtogether.Bothwereattemptstowritehistorieswithvery broad coverage in time and space. Edward Gibbon’s History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, published beginning in 1776, took for its subject the entirety of Europe and much of West Asia over a period of morethana millennium.Voltaire’sEssaisurlesmœursetl’espritdesnations, first published in 1756, was yet more expansive, starting with the beginning of recorded civilization and extending almost to his own day. Both developed approaches that were world-historical in the sense that they were supposed to be applicable always and everywhere. And both realized, too, that in order to be so, they would have to engage with the scholarly traditions of the world beyond Europe.1 1 Jennifer Pitts, “The Global in Enlightenment Historical Thought,” in A Companion to Global Historical Thought, ed.
  • Research on Joachim Bouvet's Chinese

    Research on Joachim Bouvet's Chinese

    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Joachim Bouvet’s interpretation of Zhouyi and his mathematical model : research on Joachim Bouvet’s Chinese manuscripts of Yijing in the Apostolic Vatican Library collection Mu, Xiaofeng 2020 Mu, X. (2020). Joachim Bouvet’s interpretation of Zhouyi and his mathematical model : research on Joachim Bouvet’s Chinese manuscripts of Yijing in the Apostolic Vatican Library collection. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144167 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/144167 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY‑NC 4.0). Downloaded on 06 Oct 2021 16:38:40 SGT Joachim Bouvet’s Interpretation of Zhouyi and His Mathematical Model Research on Joachim Bouvet’s Chinese Manuscripts of Yijing in the Apostolic Vatican Library Collection MU XIAOFENG SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES 2020 Joachim Bouvet’s Interpretation of Zhouyi and His Mathematical Model Research on Joachim Bouvet’s Chinese Manuscripts of Yijing in the Apostolic Vatican Library Collection MU XIAOFENG School of Humanities A thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2020 Statement of Originality I certify that all work submitted for this thesis is my original work. I declare that no other person's work has been used without due acknowledgement. Except where it is clearly stated that I have used some of this material elsewhere, this work has not been presented by me for assessment in any other institution or University.
  • Jesuits' Journeys in Chinese Studies

    Jesuits' Journeys in Chinese Studies

    For the “World Conference on Sinology 2007” Renmin University of China, Beijing 2007.03.26-28 Jesuits’ Journeys in Chinese Studies Yves Camus Macau Ricci Institute © Macau Ricci Institute, 2007 Abstract There is a general agreement among scholars that “Chinese Studies” or “Sinology” (with its cluster of various disciplines), was initiated by the Christian Catholic missionaries of the Jesuit order who have lived in China since the last decades of the Ming dynasty. The purpose of this paper is to examine how these prolonged “Journeys,” towards knowledge, understanding, appreciation and mutual collaboration, have developed, inside and outside of China, into a Jesuit tradition which is still very much alive and thriving. The first stage, from the late Ming and the Qing dynasties, until the suppression of the Jesuit order in 1773, is well known. This paper attempts to discern the main areas in which Chinese Studies developed in this first period of contact. The second stage: after the restoration of the Society of Jesus (1814), a new generation of Jesuits came to live and work in China. They resumed various forms of “Sinological research” in a number of areas, particularly in Shanghai where a “Bureau d’Études Sinologiques” (Office of Sinological Studies) was established. The third stage: the tradition of Jesuit Chinese Studies continued after the foundation of the People’s Republic of China, though not in China proper. In synchrony with changes happening in the world, and particularly under the influence of the Second Vatican Council, these studies were not only pursued on an individual basis, as in the early stages of Jesuit presence in China, but also by the founding of the Ricci Institute, in three, and now four locations, dedicated to Chinese studies (Taipei, Paris, San Francisco, and Macau).
  • Jesuit Libraries in the Old and the New Society of Jesus As a Historiographical Theme

    Jesuit Libraries in the Old and the New Society of Jesus As a Historiographical Theme

    International Symposia on Jesuit Studies ISSN: 2766-0664 Jesuit Libraries in the Old and the New Society of Jesus as a Historiographical Theme Author: Noël Golvers Source: Engaging Sources: The Tradition and Future of Collecting History in the Society of Jesus (Proceedings of the Symposium held at Boston College, June 11–13, 2019) Edited by: Cristiano Casalini, Emanuele Colombo, and Seth Meehan ISBN: 978-1-947617-09-4 Published by: Institute of Jesuit Sources Originally Published: March 1, 2021 https://doi.org/10.51238/ISJS.2019.07 Provided in Open Access by the Institute for Advanced Jesuit Studies at Boston College. The Institute of Jesuit Sources, specializes in preserving, maintaining, and expanding for scholars around the world important texts and studies in Jesuit history, spirituality, and pedagogy. Visit our website at https://jesuitsources.bc.edu Jesuit Libraries in the Old and the New Society of Jesus as a Historiographical Theme NOËL GOLVERS Beginning with the spread of Christianity in late antiquity, the clergy became one of the social groups that collected books—classical pre-Christian and Christian ti- tles alike—not only for immediate use but also for preserving and transmitting the literary tradition. The most famous, and influential, libraries may have been those of St. Augustine in Hippo Regius, Cassiodorus in Vivarium, and Pope Agapetus (r.535–36) in Rome. This tradition continued throughout the early Middle Ages, when abbeys and cloisters became almost the only sanctuaries of book culture. Especially since early modern times and the rise of humanism, these mo- nastic libraries were progressively accompanied by private book collections of “lay,” humanistic scholars.

  • Exchange of Learning Yet Failed Encounter

    Exchange of learning yet failed encounter: Behind challenges, the Acta Pekinensia, an unpublished manuscript Yves Camus sj 赵仪文 Macau Ricci Institute 澳门利氏学社 The IVth World Conference on Sinology 2014 “The Exchange of Learning between ‘East’ and ‘West’: 400 Years in Retrospect” 6-7 September 2014, Beijing Exchange of learning yet failed encounter: Behind challenges, the Acta Pekinensia, an unpublished manuscript bstract Towards the end of the European Renaissance period, a new era of cultural encounter opened in China as in Europe. In the West, despite religious and cultural crises, it was a time of internal reorganisation and global explorations. In the midst of those trouble times, the person of Matteo Ricci (1552-1610) has been seen as an initiator. Attention will first be paid to analyse the reasons for such a role and what gave Ricci so great a success: actually, what did he achieve in the “exchange of learning” at the time, be it in the philosophic or scientific fields? But soon after his death and for no less than a century (1610-1710), Matteo Ricci’s legacy has generated a large array of disputed interpretations, not first or only in the Chinese Empire for his so called “accommodative” approach to Chinese cultural and spiritual traditions, but all the more so in Europe. Ricci’s successors and fellow Jesuits, through their many letters from China and scholarly publications in Europe, did their best in defending their cause. With the European intelligentsia they shared some of the “Chinese learning” they had explored. But they had not foreseen that such a sharing and their humanistic education and culture were fostering at their disadvantage the “enlightenment spirit” of the European political establishment.
  • Theophilus Siegfried Bayer, Acquired and Augmented by the Reverend Dr Heinrich Walther Gerdes, Now Preserved in the Hunterian Library of the University of Glasgow

    Theophilus Siegfried Bayer, Acquired and Augmented by the Reverend Dr Heinrich Walther Gerdes, Now Preserved in the Hunterian Library of the University of Glasgow

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Enlighten The Bayer Collection A preliminary catalogue of the manuscripts and books of Professor Theophilus Siegfried Bayer, acquired and augmented by the Reverend Dr Heinrich Walther Gerdes, now preserved in the Hunterian Library of the University of Glasgow David Weston University of Glasgow 2018 1 Version 1.0 Published on the tercentenary of Dr William Hunter’s birth 2 1. Introduction 7 2. Chronology 13 3. Catalogue of manuscripts 17 1. Mss Hunter 2. Mss Hunter B/A-E 95 4. Palm-Leaf books and other pothi format books (PL) 185 5. Chinese and Manchu books (HC) 196 6. European printed works (PB) 229 7. Name Index 239 3 Acknowledgements In compiling this catalogue I have benefitted from the generous support and assistance of the following individuals whose insights and contributions, where relevant, are noted throughout the text: Prof. Kirill Alekseev, Peter Asplin, Prof. Charles Bawden†, Prof. Zheng Cheng, Dr Yupin Chung, Michelle Craig, Kenneth Gardner†, Prof. Walther Heissig†, Sarah Hepworth, Prof. Florence Hsia, Yuen Kwan Humble, Craig Jamieson, Dr Betty Knott- Sharpe, John Okell, Dr Stephen McDowall, Dr David McOmish, Charles Manson, Fiona Neale, Prof. Nicholas Pearce, Tong Shenxiao. In addition, I owe a special debt of gratitude to two people in particular. The former is Professor Knud Lundbaek, (1912-1995) who, many years ago now, suggested that I undertake a catalogue of all the Bayeriana at Glasgow. The second is Jack Baldwin, former Keeper of Special Collections, who appointed me to his department back in 1979, and whose constant encouragement and critical judgement have been invaluable.
  • East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine

    East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine

    Introduction from the Guest Editor A recent communication by Jacques Gernet at the Académie des Inscriptions & Belles-Lettres in Paris focused on the figure of Antoine Gaubil (1689-1759), a Jesuit missionary who worked in Beijing from 1723 to 1759. 1 Gernet quotes Paul Demiéville, who in his preface to the edition of more than 300 letters by Gaubil considered him “the greatest European sinologist of the eighteenth century, the most intelligent among the French Jesuits who founded in China the first occidental school of erudite studies on China.”2 Earlier Joseph Needham had conferred similar praise on Gaubil: “He had had a considerable astronomical training under Cassini and Maraldi at the Paris Observatory, and after his departure from France carried out what may truly be called titanic and indefatigable labours in acquiring an almost perfect knowledge of Chinese, collecting all possible texts bearing on astronomy and mathematics, and himself making astronomical obser- vations. So perfect was his knowledge of Chinese and other Asian langua- ges, that he was frequently called upon by the emperor to act as verbatim interpreter at State interviews.”3 The person of Gaubil serves as a nice entry point into the themes of circulation of knowledge and networks between China and Europe that are at the heart of this and the next issue of East Asian Science, Technology and Medicine. While in Beijing, Gaubil maintained an active relationship with many outstanding European scholars, such as Nicolas Fréret (1688-1749), secretary of the same Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres in Paris, where Gernet gave his talk.