DOCSLIB.ORG

Ekaterina Season 2 Episode Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ekaterina Season 2 Episode Guide Ekaterina season 2 episode guide Continue For the Russian TV series of 2015 on the same theme, watch the TV series Catherine the Great (2015). Ekaterina SvyagintsevaHistoric dramaAnton GoldopolskySignedARif AliyevAndrei Ivanov (series 3)Ivan zaruvaev (series 3)Director Alexander Baranov (series 1)Ramil Sabitov (series 1)Dmitry Iosifov (series 2-3) StarringMarin Alexandrov Vladimir MenshovConstan LavronenkoAlexander Lazarev Jr. Nikolai KozakRinal MukhametovSergey MarinArthiom Alexeygor SklyarVladimir JaglihSergey KoltakhamiMhail GorevaStarislav StrelkovAlina TomnikovaArtur IvanovAngelina StrechinaCompozer (Nikolai Rostov) seasons3No. episodes40ProductionExecutive producer (s)Lilia ChexterAlexandra Shahnazarova (series 1)Suzanne Moisen (series 2-3)Producer (s) Alexander AkopovAlalia SchneiderovaTatiana Belichenko (series 1)Alexei Kozin (series 1-2)Ekaterina Efanova (series 1-2) Alexey Kublitsky (series 1)2) Blavatnik (series 2)Anton Goldopolsky (series 2-3)Dmitry Golubnichy (series 2-3)Nikolai Rostov (series 3)Anastasia Koretskaya (series 3)Production place (s) St. PetersburgMoscowPremiki NovgorodPragesinematographyMaxim Shinkorenko32-60 MinutesProduction Company (season 1).Production 1-2)STUDIO COSMOS (seasons 2-3) Release ofRussiaPicture formatHDTV 1080iAudio formatDolby Digital 5.1Original release24 November 2014 (2014-11-24) - presentInsiveInsive linksWebsite Ekaterina 2014 Russia-1 historical television series starring Marina Alexandrov as a possible Russian Empress Catherine the Great. The first season tells the story of Princess Sophie Friederika Auguste and her rise to power to become Empress of Russia, after the coup d'etat and the murder of her husband Peter III. The second season depicts the challenges she faces at home and abroad in the early years of her reign, when she tries to revive Russia to become one of the great powers of Europe, and becomes called the Great. The first season premiered on November 24, 2014 on Russia 1 and was released on Amazon in 2017 under the title Catherine: The Rise of Catherine the Great. The second season premiered on Russia 1 on February 27, 2017 and was released on Amazon in 2018. The series originally aired on the Day 21, 2019. During the broadcast, the series took the first place in the ratings of film and television series in Russia and became one of the most popular tv series in the Russian Federation. Plot summary Season 1: Catherine (2014) Motto - I will reign ... otherwise I will die... In 1744 in St. Petersburg, Empress Elizabeth is childless and appoints her nephew Peter Fedorovich as heir to the Russian throne. But he was born in Prussia and could barely speak Russian. Elizabeth decides marry him to a princess, intending to take any future son and train him to become a future emperor. Elizabeth chooses a wife for her nephew, The German Princess Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Serbst-Dornburg. Sofia Frederick hopes to find happiness in a distant and foreign country, but faces intrigues and conspiracies of the Russian imperial court, indifference of her husband and plans of the Empress. The girl takes the name Ekaterina Alexeyevna (Ekaterina) and works to save herself and her children from danger, as Emperor Peter III wants to send her out of the palace. In July 1762, just six months after he became emperor, Peter made a political mistake by resigning with his courtier and relatives born in Holstein, oranienbaum, leaving his wife in St. Petersburg. July 8 and 9 Leib Guards Rebellion, toppled Peter from power, and proclaims Catherine as the new monarch. The bloodless coup d'etat succeeds, and Catherine becomes the new Empress, and thus begins the Golden Age of the Russian Empire. Season 2: The Rise of Catherine (2017) Motto - She ascended the throne to become the Great 1768. Ekaterina has ruled Russia for six years. The dangerous prospect of war with Turkey is looming. At the same time, Catherine is looking for a way to legally marry her long-time beloved Grigory Orlov and legalize their common son Alexei, to make him heir to the throne in case Pavel Petrovich (son of Catherine II and Peter III) remains childless. However, the audacious and unpredictable behavior of Orlov, as well as his problems with men's health force the Empress to abandon the idea of marriage and send his son Alexei abroad. Throwing Pavel Petrovich into the arms of his bridesmaid, Sofia Stepanovna, the Empress guarantees that Pavel Petrovich can have children. Having got rid of Orlov, Ekaterina falls in love with the guard Grigory Potemkin and finds in Europe a bride for Pavel Petrovich, Wilhelmina Louise of Hesse-Darmstadt. 1774. The Russo-Turkish War ends with the victory of Russia, which establishes its protectorate over the Crimean Khanate and gets access to the Black and Azov Seas. 1776. Pavel Petrovich marries the Duchess Sophie Dorothea Wurttemberg for the second time, and Catherine marries Potemkin, who in her honor establishes the city of Ekaterinoslav in the south of the empire. 1780. Catherine releases from prison the family of Braunschweig, the children of Duke Anton Ulrich - great-grandchildren of Peter the Great. They're going to Denmark. 1782. Catherine opens a monument to Peter the Great in St. Petersburg and sends Pavel Petrovich with his wife and children on a trip to Europe. Season 3: Catherine. Impostors (2019) Motto - Russia is waiting... I won't let anyone stop me! Note: This season runs between the 11th and 12th episode of the second season, from 1774 to 1774. The reign of the great and mighty Catherine is under threat. The Russo-Turkish war continues, depleting the treasury of the Empire. Numerous contenders appear with claims to the throne. Peasant war in full swing - a war led by Emelian Pugachev, who surrendered to Peter III. Inside the palace is also a danger: nobles want to hand over the throne to his eldest son Paul. Catherine's personal life is turbulent. She lost hope for a child with Prince Potemkin. She has new love interests, new favorites. But the greatest and most important love of the Empress is Russia itself. Catherine must make decisions that determine the fate of her throne and her empire. Cast Catherine the Great Ekaterina Alexeyevna /Sophie Friedericke Auguste,Princess of Anhalt-Zerbst-DornburgEkaterina characterPortrayed byMarina AlexandrovaFirst appearanceEpisode 1.01Last appearanceEpisode 3.16FamilyFatherChristian August, Prince of Anhalt-ZerbstMotherJohanna of Holstein-GottorpBrothers William Christian Frederick Frederick Augustus, Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst SistersAuguste Christine CharlotteElizabeth UlrikeHusband Peter III (m. 1745; died 1762) Grigory Potemkin (m. 1775) Sons Pavel I Petrovich Alexey Bobrinsky DaughtersAnna PetrovnaStepdaughtersElizaveta TemkinaGrandsons Semyon Veliky Alexander I Grandfathers John Louis I of Anhalt-Dornburg Christian August of Holstein-Gottorp, Prince of Eutin Grandmothers Princess Christine Eleonore of Zeutsch Albertina of Baden-Durlach Uncles Adolf Frederick, King of Sweden Frederick August I of Oldenburg John Louis II of Anhalt-Zerbst First cousins Gustav III of Sweden Charles XIII of Sweden Frederick Adolf of Östergötland Sophia of Quedlinburg Wilhelm of Oldenburg Hedvig of Holstein-Gottorp Marina Alexandrova as Princess Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst / Her Highness Ekaterina Alekseyevna / Empress Catherine the Great Julia Aug as Empress Elizaveta Petrovna [series 1; 2–3 — flashbacks only] Aleksandr Yatsenko as His Highness Pyotr Fyodorovich / Emperor Peter III [series 1; 2-3 - flashbacks only Pavel Tabakov as His Highness Pavel Petrovich (series 2-3) Vladimir Menshov as Count / Count Alexey Bestuzhev-Rumin (series 1) Konstantin Lavronenko as Count / Count Johann Lestock (series 1) Alexander Lazarev Jr. as Count / Count Alexei Razumovsky (series 1) Nikolai Kozak as Count / Count Alexander Shuvalov (series 1) Rinal Mukhametov as Count Sergei Saltykov (series 1; 2 - memories of only Sergei Strelnikov as captain Grigory Orlov (series 1) Sergey Marin as Count / Count Grigory Orlov (series 2-3) Mikhail Gavrilov as Alexei Orlov (series 1) Artem Alekseev as Count / Count Alexei Orlov (series 2) Kirill Rubtsov (series 1) / Igor Sklyar (series 2-3) in the film Ivan Betskaya Vladimir Yaglych in the film Grigory Potemkin (series 2-3) Sergey Koltakov as Chancellor Panina Panina Mikhail Gorevoy as privy councillor Stepan Sheshkovsky [series 2–3] Stanislav Strelkov as cabinet secretary Adam Olsufyev [series 2– 3] Alina Tomnikov as Princess Wilhelmina of Hesse-Darmstadt / Her Higness Natalya Alexeyevna [series 2–3] Artur Ivanov as Yemelyan Pugachev [series 3] Angelina Strechina as Princess Tarakanova [series 3] Isabelle Schosing as Joanna Elisabeth of Holstein-Gottorp, mother of Catherine The Great Vitaly Kravchenko as Generalfeldmarschall Stepan Apraksin Elena Shamova as Gemma, a servant Ivan Dobronravov as Pimen, a servant / medicus Svetlana Korchagina as Matryona, a servant Alexey Vorobyov as Count Stanisław August Poniatowski [series 1] Marcin Stec as King Stanisław August Poniatowski [series 2]: Jacub Snochowski as Krzysztof Piecki, a valet of Stanisław Poniatowski [series 2] Maxim Kerin as Brockdorff, a valet of Peter III Hartmouth Krug [series 1] / Stass Klassen [series 2] as King Frederick II : Yuri Maslak as General Hans Joachim von Sitin Vitas Eisenach as Axel von Mardefeld, Prussian Ambassador Patrick Rui Rollin as the Marquis de la Hetardi, French Ambassador Pavel Vorozhtsov as Mikhail Lomonosov Polina Lazarev as Countess Ekaterina Vorontsova-Dashkova, Peter III's favorite Valentina Talyzin as the nanny of ex-Emperor Ivan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796
    Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 By Thomas Lucius Lowish A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2021 Abstract Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 by Thomas Lucius Lowish Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Historians of Russian monarchy have avoided the concept of sovereignty, choosing instead to describe how monarchs sought power, authority, or legitimacy. This dissertation, which centers on Catherine the Great, the empress of Russia between 1762 and 1796, takes on the concept of sovereignty as the exercise of supreme and untrammeled power, considered legitimate, and shows why sovereignty was itself the major desideratum. Sovereignty expressed parity with Western rulers, but it would allow Russian monarchs to bring order to their vast domain and to meaningfully govern the lives of their multitudinous subjects. This dissertation argues that Catherine the Great was a crucial figure in this process. Perceiving the confusion and disorder in how her predecessors exercised power, she recognized that sovereignty required both strong and consistent procedures as well as substantial collaboration with the broadest possible number of stakeholders. This was a modern conception of sovereignty, designed to regulate the swelling mechanisms of the Russian state. Catherine established her system through careful management of both her own activities and the institutions and servitors that she saw as integral to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor an Eigliteentli-Centuryfarce By
    The VO Russian and East European Studies Center is proud to present The Minor an eigliteentli-centuryfarce by Denis Fonvizin HedopoCJlb ,[I;eHHca <POHBH3HHa :9Liapteaby Ju[ia Nimirovs~aya 'With Songs by'Yu[ii 1(jm fJ)irector~ 9{ptes Russia in the 18th century was known as a "woman's kingdom." During the course of almost 70 years there was a woman on the throne. Longer than any other ruled the most powerful, the most clever and educated of them all-Catherine the Great. Many Western philosophers, such as Voltaire and Diderot, considered her a truly enlightened monarch. Denis Fonvizin was the secretary of her personal enemy, Count Panin. Fonviziil wrote his most famous comedy The Minor in 1782; it is one of the 10 most famous Russian plays in the canon and one of the most frequently produced. Contemporaries read it as a criticism of female dominance and a satire on Catherine's reign, with the message that a strong woman is worse than a tyrannical man. The play's other goal was to show the audience that education improves people morally, while ignorance allows them to degrade and become mere beasts (thus the pig-loving Skotinin). In this comedy, all the educated people are kind and good, and all the uneducated people behave like animals. Of course, according to the laws of classical comedy, light and goodness con~er darkness and malice. It was not always this way in the 18t century-goodness did not always win. But we remember this century as a time of brilliant individualities, when strong personalities, eccentrics, and other talented people made their mark.
    [Show full text]
  • The Education of Alexander and Nicholas Pavlovich Romanov The
    Agata Strzelczyk DOI: 10.14746/bhw.2017.36.8 Department of History Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań The education of Alexander and Nicholas Pavlovich Romanov Abstract This article concerns two very different ways and methods of upbringing of two Russian tsars – Alexander the First and Nicholas the First. Although they were brothers, one was born nearly twen- ty years before the second and that influenced their future. Alexander, born in 1777 was the first son of the successor to the throne and was raised from the beginning as the future ruler. The person who shaped his education the most was his grandmother, empress Catherine the Second. She appoint- ed the Swiss philosopher La Harpe as his teacher and wanted Alexander to become the enlightened monarch. Nicholas, on the other hand, was never meant to rule and was never prepared for it. He was born is 1796 as the ninth child and third son and by the will of his parents, Tsar Paul I and Tsarina Maria Fyodorovna he received education more suitable for a soldier than a tsar, but he eventually as- cended to the throne after Alexander died. One may ask how these differences influenced them and how they shaped their personalities as people and as rulers. Keywords: Romanov Children, Alexander I and Nicholas I, education, upbringing The education of Alexander and Nicholas Pavlovich Romanov Among the ten children of Tsar Paul I and Tsarina Maria Feodorovna, two sons – the oldest Alexander and Nicholas, the second youngest son – took the Russian throne. These two brothers and two rulers differed in many respects, from their characters, through poli- tics, views on Russia’s place in Europe, to circumstances surrounding their reign.
    [Show full text]
  • BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: the EMERGENCE of a NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM in RUSSIA by Alyssa J. Deblasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova
    BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA by Alyssa J. DeBlasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova University, 2003 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2010 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Alyssa J. DeBlasio It was defended on May 14, 2010 and approved by Tatiana Artemyeva, Professor, Herzen State Pedagogical University (St. Petersburg, Russia), Department of Theory and History of Culture Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures James P. Scanlan, Emeritus Professor, The Ohio State University, Department of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Alyssa J. DeBlasio 2010 iii BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA Alyssa J. DeBlasio, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 This dissertation takes as its primary task the evaluation of a conflict of paradigms in Russian philosophical thought in the past decade. If until the early nineties Russian philosophers were often guilty of uncritically attributing to their domestic philosophy a set of characteristics that fell along the lines of a religious/secular binary (e.g. literary vs. analytic; continuous vs. ruptured), in recent years the same scholarship is moving away from the nineteenth-century model of philosophy as a “path” or “special mission,” as it has been called by Konstantin Aksakov, Aleksei Khomiakov, Ivan Kireevskii, and later, Nikolai Berdiaev, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN TRADITION of the KNIGHTS of MALTA OSJ The
    RUSSIAN TRADITION OF THE KNIGHTS OF MALTA OSJ The Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller is a collection of charitable organisations claiming continuity with the Russian Orthodox grand priory of the Order of Saint John. Their distinction emerged when the Mediterranean stronghold of Malta was captured by Napoleon in 1798 when he made his expedition to Egypt. As a ruse, Napoleon asked for safe harbor to resupply his ships, and then turned against his hosts once safely inside Valletta. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch failed to anticipate or prepare for this threat, provided no effective leadership, and readily capitulated to Napoleon. This was a terrible affront to most of the Knights desiring to defend their stronghold and sovereignty. The Order continued to exist in a diminished form and negotiated with European governments for a return to power. The Emperor of Russia gave the largest number of Knights shelter in St Petersburg and this gave rise to the Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller and recognition within the Russian Imperial Orders. In gratitude the Knights declared Ferdinand von Hompesch deposed and Emperor Paul I was elected as the new Grand Master. Origin Blessed Gerard created the Order of St John of Jerusalem as a distinctive Order from the previous Benedictine establishment of Hospitallers (Госпитальеры). It provided medical care and protection for pilgrims visiting Jerusalem. After the success of the First Crusade, it became an independent monastic order, and then as circumstances demanded grafted on a military identity, to become an Order of knighthood. The Grand Priory of the Order moved to Rhodes in 1312, where it ruled as a sovereign power, then to Malta in 1530 as a sovereign/vassal power.
    [Show full text]
  • Mikhail Shcherbatov Introduction.Pdf
    French in the education of the nobility: Mikhail Shcherbatov’s letters to his son Dmitrii Introduction Prince Mikhail Shcherbatov Prince Mikhail Mikhailovich Shcherbatov (1733-90) was a member of a large and ancient noble family that claimed to be descended from Riurik, the Norseman who, according to the Russian chronicles, had founded the Russian state in 862. One of Mikhail’s forebears, Ivan Andreevich Shcherbatov, who happened to become his father-in-law (and who also features in this corpus of primary source texts), had served as a diplomat in London in the reigns of Anne and Elizabeth. Mikhail’s father had seen military service in the wars of Peter I (the Great) against the Turks and the Swedes and had risen to the rank of Major-General. Mikhail himself, as a deputy elected by the nobility of the District of Iaroslavl, played a prominent role in the deliberations of the Legislative Commission set up in 1767 by Catherine II (the Great) with the supposed aim of drawing up a new code of laws and, even more ambitiously, fundamental political laws informed by the ideas of western thinkers of the Age of Enlightenment, above all Montesquieu.1 Resentful of the recent elevation of commoners such as Peter’s favourite, Prince Aleksandr Menshikov (1673-1729), Shcherbatov insisted on the pre-eminence of the high nobility of ancient lineage and made every effort to halt the rise of the newer service gentry. He accordingly opposed the meritocratic principle which is embodied in the Table of Ranks that Peter introduced in 1722 and which was favoured as a criterion for admission to and status in the nobility by many notable Russian writers and thinkers of the eighteenth century, including the satirist and diplomat Antiokh Kantemir and, in Shcherbatov’s own age, the dramatist Denis Fonvizin (1744 or 1745-92).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Theater
    HUMANITIES INSTITUTE Ayse Dietrich, Ph.D. RUSSIAN THEATER Overview Until the 11th century the early Russian people had primitive forms of entertainment, mostly ritualistic ceremonies, pagan shows with dramatic recitations of fables, tales and proverbs, and singing and dances, performed by skomorokhi, traveling minstrels. While in the past the rigid rules of the Orthodox Church made the development of a truly national theater impossible, and theaters suffered partial destruction and the persecution of performers, during the Soviet period theaters had to conform to the rigid frames of ideological dictatorship. ANCIENT PERIOD Pagan ceremonies in which tales, proverbs and fables were recited, together with the songs and dances of itinerant jesters, known as skomorokhi, laid the foundation for the development of Russian theater. POST CLASSICAL PERIOD Skomorokhi: The Skomorokhi, based on Byzantine models, appeared around the middle of the 11th century in Kievan Rus and were performers who played musical instruments, sang, danced and even composed the scores for their performances. The skomorokhi were not universally popular in Kievan Rus, and were described in pejorative terms in the Primary Chronicle. Both the ruling authorities and the Orthodox Church viewed the skomorokhi as being in league with the devil, and persecuted them for maintaining what they regarded as pagan traditions. A major reason for the skomorokhi’s unpopularity with both the secular and religious leaders was the nature of their art. The skomorokhi’s performances were aimed at ordinary people, and often were in opposition to those in power. As a result the clergy and feudal rulers viewed the skomorokhi as useless to society at the very least, and politically and religiously dangerous at the very worst.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Empress-Navigator
    Russia’s Empress-Navigator: Transforming Modes of Monarchy During the Reign of Anna Ivanovna, 1730-1740 Jacob Bell University of Illinois 2019 Winner of the James Madison Award for Excellence in Historical Scholarship The eighteenth century was a markedly volatile period in the history of Russia, seeing its development and international emergence as a European-styled empire. In narratives of this time of change, historians tend to view the century in two parts: the reign of Peter I (r. 1682-1725), who purportedly spurred Russia into modernization, and Catherine II (r. 1762-96), the German princess-turned-empress who presided over the culmination of Russia’s transformation. Yet, dismissal of nearly forty years of Russia’s history does a severe disservice to the sovereigns and governments that formed the process of change. Recently, Catherine Evtuhov turned her attention to investigating Russia under the rule of Elizabeth Petrovna (r. 1741-62), bolstering the conversation with a greater perspective of one of these “forgotten reigns,” but Elizabeth owed much to her post-Petrine predecessors. Specifically, Empress Anna Ivanovna (r. 1730-40) remains one of the most overlooked and underappreciated sovereigns of the interim between the “Greats.”1 Anna Ivanovna was born on February 7, 1693, the daughter of Praskovia Saltykova and Ivan V Alekseyvich (r. 1682-96), the son of Tsar Aleksey Mikhailovich (r. 1645-1676). When Anna was 1 Anna’s patronymic is also transliterated as Anna Ioannovna. I elected to use “Ivanovna” to closer resemble modern Russian. Lindsey Hughes, Russia in the Age of Peter the Great (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998); Catherine Evtuhov’s upcoming book is Russia in the Age of Elizabeth (1741-61).
    [Show full text]
  • 15/35/54 Liberal Arts and Sciences Russian & East European Center
    15/35/54 Liberal Arts and Sciences Russian & East European Center Paul B. Anderson Papers, 1909-1988 Papers of Paul B. Anderson (1894-1985), including correspondence, maps, notes, reports, photographs, publications and speeches about the YMCA World Service (1919-58), International Committee (1949-78), Russian Service (1917-81), Paris Headquarters (1922-67) and Press (1919-80); American Council of Voluntary Agencies (1941-47); Anglican-Orthodox Documents & Joint Doctrinal Commission (1927-77); China (1913-80); East European Fund & Chekhov Publishing House (1951-79); displaced persons (1940-52); ecumenical movement (1925-82); National Council of Churches (1949-75); prisoners of war (1941-46); Religion in Communist Dominated Areas (1931-81); religion in Russia (1917-82); Russian Correspondence School (1922-41); Russian emigrés (1922-82); Russian Orthodox Church (1916-81) and seminaries (1925-79); Russian Student Christian Movement (1920-77); Tolstoy Foundation (1941-76) and War Prisoners Aid (1916-21). For an autobiographical account, see Donald E. Davis, ed., No East or West: The Memoirs of Paul B. Anderson (Paris: YMCA-Press, 1985). For Paul Anderson's "Reflections on Religion in Russia, 1917-1967" and a bibliography, see Richard H. Marshall Jr., Thomas E. Bird and Andrew Q. Blane, Eds., Aspects of Religion in the Soviet Union 1917-1967 (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1971). Provenance Note: The Paul B. Anderson Papers first arrived at the University Archives on May 16, 1983. They were opened on September 11, 1984 and a finding aid completed on December 15, 1984. The cost of shipping the papers and the reproduction of the finding aid was borne by the Russian and East European Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogue of Cultures and Partnership of Civilizations
    RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF EDUCATION ST. PETERSBURG INTELLIGENTSIA CONGRESS ST. PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES under the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia DIALOGUE OF CULTURES AND PARTNERSHIP OF CIVILIZATIONS May 15–20, 2014 The Conference is held in accordance with The conference, originally called ‘The Days of Sci - the Decree of President of Russia V. V. Putin en ce in St. Petersburg University of the Humanities ‘On perpetuating the memory and Social Sciences’ is the 22nd in number of Dmitry Sergeyevich Likhachov’ and the 14th in the status of the International No 587, dated from May 23, 2001 Likhachov Scientific Conference To implement the project ‘The 14th International Likhachov Scientific Conference’ state funds are used. The funds are allocated as a grant in accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2013 No 115–rp and the tender held by the Association “Znaniye” of Russia St. Petersburg 2014 ББК 72 Д44 Scientifi c editor A. S. Zapesotsky, Chairman of the Organizing Committee of the International Likhachov Scientifi c Conference, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr. Sc. (Cultural Studies), Professor, Scientist Emeritus of the Russian Federation, Artist Emeritus of the Russian Federation Recommended to be published by the Editorial and Publishing Council of St. Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences Dialogue of Cultures and Partnership of Civilizations: the 14th Inter national Д44 Likha chov Scientifi c Conference, May 15–20, 2014. St. Peters burg : SPbUHSS, 2014. — 174 p., il. ISBN 978-5-7621-0792-1 In the collection there were materials of the 14th Likhachov’s International Scientifi c Readings published, it was held on May 15–20, 2014 in SPbUHSS in accordance with the Decree of the Presi- dent of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin “On perpetuating the memory of Dmitry Sergeyevich Likhachov”.
    [Show full text]
  • 132 March 2019
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №132 March 2019 The monument to the Royal Martyrs at the St. Seraphim Cathedral in Vyatka "For the first time in 100 years, a descendant of the Romanovs appeared in Vyatka" From 17 to 20 of March the great-great-grandson of Alexander III, the great-grandson of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna - the sister of Emperor Nicholas II - Paul E. Kulikovsky and his wife Ludmila visited Vyatka. They were invited by the regional public organization "Revival of Vyatka". Paul E. Kulikovsky - "Kirov, or Vyatka as we prefer to call the city, was one of the places on our "to-visit-list", as we want to visit all the places in Russia directly related to the Romanovs, and especially those in which the Romanovs were in exile after the revolution. That is why first of all were visited Romanov related locations and city landmarks. But for the local citizens the main event was a presentation of the book of memoirs of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna “25 Chapters of my life”, followed by a press- conference. City history The city is actually called Kirov - in honour of one of the Stalin co- workers – Sergei Kirov killed in 1934 – but many citizens still use the historical name Vyatka. It was established in 1174. From 1457 to 1780 it was called Khlynov, from 1780 to 1934 Vyatka, and now Kirov. It is the administrative centre of the Kirov region and located on the Vyatka River, 896 km northeast of Moscow. Population is about 507,155 (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Perspective in Russian Intellectual History: Russian Political Thought in Early Modern Times
    Вивлioѳика: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies, Vol. 7 (2019): 119-123 119 __________________________________________________________________________________ A New Perspective in Russian Intellectual History: Russian Political Thought in Early Modern Times Derek Offord The University of Bristol [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ G. M. Hamburg, Russia’s Path Toward Enlightenment: Faith, Politics, and Reason, 1500– 1801. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2016, 912 p. ISBN: 9780300113136 ___________________________________________________________________________ Gary Hamburg’s erudite and thoughtful survey of early modern Russian thought began its life as part of a more general study of Russian thought up until the revolutions of 1917. As originally conceived, this study would have built upon the author’s already substantial corpus of work on nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Russian history and thought, most notably his monograph of 1992 on Boris Chicherin and his volume of 2010, co-edited with Randall A. Poole, on freedom and dignity in Russian philosophy from 1830 to 1930. As work progressed, however, it became clear that thinkers active from the early sixteenth century to the end of the eighteenth demanded more attention than Hamburg had anticipated; in fact, they came to merit a book all to themselves. The resulting 900-page product of his reflection on the prehistory of modern Russian thought enables him to straddle what are generally perceived as two great divides: First, the supposed divide between Muscovite and Imperial Russia and, second, that between the traditional religious and the secular enlightened forms of Russian culture. The enormous volume of material that Hamburg presents in this monograph is organized in three parts within a broadly chronological framework.
    [Show full text]