DOCSLIB.ORG

Bolshievik Revoluition Background Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bolshievik Revoluition Background Guide Tsar to U.S.S.R: A Joint Crisis Committee on The Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Revolution 1 Table of Contents Overview 3 Tsar to USSR Sta 4 Letter From the Chairs 7 Logistics of this Committee 8 Tsar Nicholas II and the Romanov Family 10 Revolutionaries and the Revolution Party 11 Russo-Japanese War 12 Revolution of 1905 13 Russia and the Great War 14 Timeline 15 Characters: 16 Revolutionaries: 16 Royal Cabinet/Duma: 21 Position Paper Guiding Questions 24 Bolshevik Revolution 2 Overview The Great Empire of Russia has existed for over 450 years and the Romanovs have been in power for ⅔ of that time, but now the patched up cracks are hard to ignore. Change and innovation are slow to arrive in Russia, with the Industrial Revolution arriving decades after it emerges in Europe, making life difficult for people even before the Great War begins. Whispers of a constitutional monarchy make its way through the land as new political parties like the Constitutional Democracy Party (Cadets) emerge. The economy improves little by little but it is simply not enough to sustain the population when war begins to tear the region to shreds. The economy is in a crisis and citizens are looking for some semblance of leadership to not only improve their lives, but also their international reputation. Delegates in this joint crisis committee will get to determine the fate of Russia and her people through negotiations within their own crisis room and with delegates from the opposing side. We will begin in August of 1915 after the Russian Empire is forced to retreat from Russian Poland. From here, the destiny of the Russian Empire, the Romanov family, and the stirring revolutionary movement is up to you. Choose wisely and you will be rewarded. Take a wrong step, and the whole nation may fracture and the citizens will suffer. *While this is a historical simulation, some events will deviate from history as delegates choose their own paths* Bolshevik Revolution 3 Tsar to USSR Sta Madeleine Stankiewicz: Crisis Director Madeleine Stankiewicz is a sophomore studying Political Science and Spanish with minors in Sociology and Global Studies (because she just doesn’t know when to stop adding classes). She grew up on a small farm in Stillwater, Minnesota and couldn’t be happier to have moved to the bustling city of Minneapolis. When not arguing in committee, Madeleine loves to try her hand at making pasta with her friends and staying caught up on trashy reality TV. She previously served as a crisis assistant in the Countering China committee last year and cannot wait to have a committee of her own to run this year! She is so excited to welcome you to MinneMUN and to see what the delegates have in store for her! Dhruv Singh: Crisis Director Dhruv Singh is a junior studying Economics at the University of Minnesota. Originally from Omaha, Nebraska, Dhruv spent his first two years of college at Fordham University in New York City where he fell in love with Model UN. He is currently sitting on the board of UNSA-MUN as the MSA Liaison. Dhruv regularly competes on the circuit and loves the thrill of a crisis simulation. Outside of Model UN, Dhruv is heavily involved in Jazba, an Intercollegiate South Asian Dance Competition where he is the Sponsorship Director! He loves traveling and dedicated a lot of his time into work as well. He is looking forward to meeting you all (virtually!) and wishes you all the best of luck! Priscilla Hagerman: Revolutionaries Committee Chair Priscilla Hagerman is a junior double majoring in Global Studies and Geography with a minor in political science. She has a focus in Political Economy and Environmental Change and regional concentration in Africa, but also has a strong interest in human rights advocacy. She is currently doing advocacy work with World Without Genocide, primarily working towards passing the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women in local cities. Priscilla also currently serves as the Advocacy Coordinator for UMN’s Model UN team. In her spare time, she enjoys reading, baking, embroidering, and knitting. She is looking forward to MinneMUN and can’t wait to see how her committee unfolds! Bolshevik Revolution 4 Anna Gannon: Government Officials Committee Chair Anna is a second-year student majoring in Global Studies and Sociology of Law, Criminology, and Deviance, with minors in Spanish and Social Justice. Originally from Wisconsin, she is a huge fan of cheese curds and is obsessed with Culver's. Anna is involved in the Advocacy Committee and previously served as Vice-Chair of The Syrian Opposition Committee during 2020 MinneMUN. Outside of MUN, she goes on runs over the Stone Arch Bridge, attempts to make homemade pasta, and plays card games with her roommates. She is looking forward to MinneMUN and being involved in a Crisis Committee! Bailey Newell: Vice Chair Bailey Newell is a junior Biology, Society, and the Environment major with a minor in History. She grew up in Platte City, Missouri. She is currently an active member of Alpha Sigma Kappa, Multipotentialites in Medicine, and Model UN. In her free time she likes to try new recipes, read fantasy books, and explore Minneapolis. She previously served as Chair for MinneMUN's Russian Bioterrorism Committee in 2019. She looks forward to meeting all of you, and can't wait to help make the Bolshevik Revolution Committee a success! August Krueger: Crisis Assistant August Krueger is a sophomore in the College of Biological Sciences majoring in biochemistry and chemistry with a minor in Spanish. He is hoping to go to school for his PhD in biochemistry (or something related) after graduating. He was introduced to MUN through his friends and decided to join in order to expand his knowledge on international politics. This is his first year of MUN, and he is excited to see where it will take him in the time to come. Chloe Carstenson: Crisis Assistant Chloe Carstenson is a sophomore majoring in global studies with a minor in Arabic. This is her first year of MUN at the University of Minnesota and she is so excited to see what happens in committee! Outside of MUN, she loves to bake, do yoga, and spend copious amounts of time on TikTok. Bolshevik Revolution 5 Carter Curti: Crisis Assistant Carter Curti is a freshman studying Political Science and History. When he’s not doing Model UN, you can find him reading a book or doing pottery. Carter can also be spotted running around Minneapolis when it isn’t -20° outside. He is originally from Edina, Minnesota, where he participated in MUN and has continued virtually in college. He is excited to be a crisis assistant for the first time! Julia Borelli: Crisis Assistant Julia Borellis is a freshman majoring in history and psychology with plans to go into education. This is her second year in Model UN, and she is super excited for her first MinneMUN! Bolshevik Revolution 6 Letter From the Chairs Dear Distinguished Delegates, Welcome to the 2021 University of Minnesota Model United Nations (MinneMUN) Conference! You are now an active member of Tsar to U.S.S.R.: Joint Crisis Committee and will be tasked with representing some of the most important figures during the Bolshevik Revolution. The Russian Revolution has had a lasting impact, leading to the establishment of the Soviet Union. In our Crisis Committee, the year is 1915, and Russia is troubled with the Great War, facing tensions within the nation’s own borders. Citizens seek leadership during a time of economic crisis, crime, and war. Will the Tsar regain control and order? Will the revolutionaries establish a new government? Does Russia have the ability to be salvaged? As a delegate, you will have the ability to influence historical events and shape the revolution. The Communist Manifesto is arguably one of the most important pieces of writing in the world’s history. It has inspired people and movements for over a century. Most notably, Karl Marx’s writing is attributed with inspiring the rise of Communism in the Great Empire of Russia. The Bolshevik Revolution marked a significant turning point in history. The Revolution brought communism to the forefront of international politics. It ultimately led to the rise of the USSR and the Cold War. The dynamics created by these global shifts have had a lasting impact on the world and continue to affect relationships between nations today. While the topic at hand has had a massive impact on the world, we are excited to see how the committees will address these revolutionary ideas. How the events of 1915 unfold is up to the delegates of this joint committee. Your decisions will impact whether the Russian Empire will remain strong or will collapse into the hands of the revolutionaries, or whether a new power will rise entirely. Although this year might be different than in person committees, we are committed to working and adapting with you as delegates. We highly encourage you to read the background guide and research your role, as crises will run smoother with preparation. As your chairs, we look forward to meeting you in committee and seeing how your ideas reshape history. Diplomatically yours, Priscilla Hagerman & Anna Gannon Chairs, Tsar to USSR Bolshevik Revolution 7 Logistics of this Committee Zoom: Zoom will be used as the primary platform for this conference. In order to use it as intended, Delegates will need to have installed the latest updates to have the ability to move around break out rooms freely during unmoderated caucuses.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jewish Socialists Around Vpered1
    BORIS SAPIR JEWISH SOCIALISTS AROUND VPERED1 SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA AMONG JEWS AND VPERED The importance of the "Lavrists" or "Vperedovtsy", named after the publication Vpered (Forward) (i873-1877) founded and edited by Peter Lavrovich Lavrov, in the evolution of the socialist ideas and groups in Russia has been recognized by historians from Alphonse Thun to Franco Venturi.2 The journal's role in the dissemination of the socialist credo among Russian Jews has never been seriously disputed, although seldom recorded in concrete terms. Of the leading Lavrists only Nicolas Kuliabko-Koretskii left memoirs.3 But he, as well as Lavrov who compiled an interesting outline of the main phases of the "Narodnichestvo"4 were not exceedingly interested in the Jewish aspect of their oeuvre. They touched this topic only in passing and, if at all, referred to Liberman whose Jewish socialism captivated their imagination. There was no reason for them to indicate and to dwell on the Jewish origin of socialist Jews in their midst who never associated themselves with any Jewish cause or aspirations. The outsiders who did so many years afterwards, knew too little about the internal affairs of Vpered and, therefore, either exaggerated its influence among Jews or underestimated the importance of leading Jewish Lavrists or, which 1 With slight changes this paper was read at the YIVO Research Conference on Jewish participation in movements devoted to the cause of social progress, New York, September 10-13, '964. 1 A. Thun, Geschichte der revolutionaren Bewegung in Russland, Leipzig 1883; F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, London i960. The reader of this journal may find a condensed treatment of the position and influence of Vpered in Boris Sapir, Unknown Chapters in the history of Vpered, in: International Review of Social History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenin, What Is to Be Done.Indd
    XIII Editor’s Preface This work saw the light of day in the heat of a decisive battle for the international proletariat. What Is to Be Done? constituted the essential weapon with which to fight revisionism. This, even in its Russian form, denied the scientific nature of Marxist analysis, i.e. it excluded for the proletariat even the possibility of equip- ping itself with a strategy. What Is to Be Done? is the precious magnifying glass that allows us to reread the chapters of the history of our class from a Leninist point of view. In order to do this, we can follow the Russian script. Between 1884 and 1894, Marxist theory gathered strength, but the Marxists, among the currents of avant-garde thought, only had very few disciples. Between 1894 and 1898, the labour movement revealed its political awakening in the struggle via strikes. 1898-1902 was a period of dispersion, of theoretical and organisational eclecticism ; it was the artisanal phase of the political struggle fought by the vanguard of the Russian proletariat. What Is to Be Done? was published as the theoretical guidebook allowing that phase to be left behind. Lenin focused on the Russian precursors of revolutionary Marxism. The latter had the merit of being considered the world vanguard of the revolutionary democratic movement. Lenin hoped that the nascent social-democratic movement would be able to be nurtured with the « same devoted de- termination and vigour ». Eighteen years later, in “Left-Wing” Communism : an Infantile Disorder, he picked up this concept again and underlined it : « For about half a century – approximately from the forties to the nineties of the last century – progressive thought in XIV Lenin – What Is to Be Done Russia, oppressed by a most brutal and reactionary tsarism, sought eagerly for a correct revolutionary theory, and fol- lowed with the utmost diligence and thoroughness each and every “last word” in this sphere in Europe and America.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MENSHEVIKS in 1917 by Olegpmwkov Bachelor of Arts
    THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 r:. = BY OLEGpmwKOV Bachelor of Arts Moscow State Pedagogical Institute Moscow, USSR 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July 1992 THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor 0 Dean of the Graduate College 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere appreciation to Dr. George F. Jewsbury and Dr. Joel M. Jenswold for their encouragement and advice throughout my graduate program. Many thanks also go to Dr. W. Roger Biles for serving on my graduate committee. Their suggestions and support were very helpful throughout the study. To Wann Smith for his expert typing and proofing skills; to Oscar Kursner for his help in translation. My wife, Y elaina Khripkov, encouraged and supported me all the way and helped me keep the end goal constantly in sight. Thanks go to her for her undivided time in the final stages of the project. She prov 1ded moral support and was a real believer in my abilities. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. The Main Approaches to the Study of the Russian Revolution in American Historiography 2 The Study of Menshevism in the U.S. 6 Soviet Scholars on Menshevism 8 Sources 1 2 Themes and Problems 14 II. Tiffi "HONEYMOON' OF Tiffi REVOLUTION_~-~-~! 8 The Necessity for the Dual Power 1 8 The Essence and Structure of Dual Power 2 7 Establishing of the Revolutionary Defensists Policy3 5 III. THE APRIL CRISIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES _____4 7 The First Clash.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influences of Chernyshevsky, Tkachev, and Nechaev on The
    THE INFLITENCES OF CHERNYSHEVSKY, TKA,CHEV, AI'ID NECHAEV ON TIIE POLTTTCAL THOUGHT OF V.I. LETITIN THE INFLUENCES OF CHERNySHEVSKY, TKACHEV, AND NECHASV ON THE POLITICAL THOUGHT OF V.I. LENIN BY IAII GRAEI.{E WALLACE, B"A. (Hons) A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilnent of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University (c) Copyright by Ian Wallace lAct{ASTER UNIVERSITY LTBRARY I,IASTER OF ARTS (L9921 Mc}TASTER I'NIVERSITY (Political Science) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The fnfluences of Chernyshevsky, Tkachev, and Nechaev on the political thought of V.f. Lenin. AIIIHOR: Ian Graene Wallace, B.A. (Hons) (McMaster University) SIJPERVISOR: Professor Marshall Goldstein. NIJI{BER OF PAGES: v, L82 lt ABsTRACT The collapse of the Soviet Union has challenged Marxist political theory. Many people saw the collapse of the Soviet Union as a defeat of Marxisn. Most scholars of Poritical Theory rearize that Lenin did not folrow Marxist writings. However, most still consider Lenin as predominately a Marxist. This thesis witl examine the source of Lenin,s ideas on Class, the Party, and the Revolution, and will trace these differences with Marx to chernyshevsky, Tkachev, and Nechaev. rt will irrustrate the extent of the influence of Lenints Russian, non-Marxist, predecessors. Lenin did indeed study and adopt aspects of Marxisn, but he d.iffered with hin in some important areas, particularly Class, the Party, and the Revolution. Marx, writing in western Europe, sought human emancipation, whire Lenin, in backlrard, autocratic Russia, sought political emancipation from the Tsarist autocracy. This resurted in differences between the thought and writings of Lenin and Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN TRADITION of the KNIGHTS of MALTA OSJ The
    RUSSIAN TRADITION OF THE KNIGHTS OF MALTA OSJ The Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller is a collection of charitable organisations claiming continuity with the Russian Orthodox grand priory of the Order of Saint John. Their distinction emerged when the Mediterranean stronghold of Malta was captured by Napoleon in 1798 when he made his expedition to Egypt. As a ruse, Napoleon asked for safe harbor to resupply his ships, and then turned against his hosts once safely inside Valletta. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch failed to anticipate or prepare for this threat, provided no effective leadership, and readily capitulated to Napoleon. This was a terrible affront to most of the Knights desiring to defend their stronghold and sovereignty. The Order continued to exist in a diminished form and negotiated with European governments for a return to power. The Emperor of Russia gave the largest number of Knights shelter in St Petersburg and this gave rise to the Russian tradition of the Knights Hospitaller and recognition within the Russian Imperial Orders. In gratitude the Knights declared Ferdinand von Hompesch deposed and Emperor Paul I was elected as the new Grand Master. Origin Blessed Gerard created the Order of St John of Jerusalem as a distinctive Order from the previous Benedictine establishment of Hospitallers (Госпитальеры). It provided medical care and protection for pilgrims visiting Jerusalem. After the success of the First Crusade, it became an independent monastic order, and then as circumstances demanded grafted on a military identity, to become an Order of knighthood. The Grand Priory of the Order moved to Rhodes in 1312, where it ruled as a sovereign power, then to Malta in 1530 as a sovereign/vassal power.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Lenin and the Iskra Faction of the RSDLP 1899-1903 Richard Mullin Doctor of Philosophy Resubmission University of Sussex March 2010 1 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree ……………………………….. 2 Contents Contents.......................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgements……………..…………………………………………………...4 Abstract........................................................................................................................5 Notes on Names, Texts and Dates…….....……………………..…………………...6 Chapter One: Historical and Historiographical Context…………………..…....7 i) 1899-1903 in the Context of Russian Social-Democratic History and Theory …12 ii) Historiographical Trends in the Study of Lenin and the RSDLP …………...…..23 iii) How the thesis develops
    [Show full text]
  • 132 March 2019
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №132 March 2019 The monument to the Royal Martyrs at the St. Seraphim Cathedral in Vyatka "For the first time in 100 years, a descendant of the Romanovs appeared in Vyatka" From 17 to 20 of March the great-great-grandson of Alexander III, the great-grandson of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna - the sister of Emperor Nicholas II - Paul E. Kulikovsky and his wife Ludmila visited Vyatka. They were invited by the regional public organization "Revival of Vyatka". Paul E. Kulikovsky - "Kirov, or Vyatka as we prefer to call the city, was one of the places on our "to-visit-list", as we want to visit all the places in Russia directly related to the Romanovs, and especially those in which the Romanovs were in exile after the revolution. That is why first of all were visited Romanov related locations and city landmarks. But for the local citizens the main event was a presentation of the book of memoirs of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna “25 Chapters of my life”, followed by a press- conference. City history The city is actually called Kirov - in honour of one of the Stalin co- workers – Sergei Kirov killed in 1934 – but many citizens still use the historical name Vyatka. It was established in 1174. From 1457 to 1780 it was called Khlynov, from 1780 to 1934 Vyatka, and now Kirov. It is the administrative centre of the Kirov region and located on the Vyatka River, 896 km northeast of Moscow. Population is about 507,155 (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Romanov News Новости Романовых
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Paul Kulikovsky №89 August 2015 A procession in memory of Tsarevich Alexei was made for the twelfth time A two-day procession in honor of the birth of the last heir to the Russian throne - St. Tsarevich Alexei, was made for the twelfth time on August 11-12 from Tsarskoye Selo to Peterhof. The tradition of the procession was born in 2004 - says the coordinator of the procession Vladimir Znahur - The icon painter Igor Kalugin gave the church an icon of St. Tsarevich. We decided that this icon should visit the Lower dacha, where the Tsarevich was born. We learned that in "Peterhof" in 1994 was a festival dedicated to the last heir to the imperial throne. We decided to go in procession from the place where they lived in the winter - from Tsarskoye Selo. Procession begins with Divine Liturgy at the Tsar's Feodorovsky Cathedral and then prayer at the beginning of the procession. The cross procession makes stops at churches and other significant sites. We called the route of our procession "From Sadness to Joy." They lived in the Alexander Palace in Tsarskoye Selo, loved it, there was born the Grand Duchess Olga. But this palace became a prison for the last of the Romanovs, where they then went on their way of the cross. It was in this palace the Tsarevich celebrated his last birthday", - says Vladimir. The next morning, after the Liturgy, we go to the birthplace of the Tsarevich - "Peterhof". Part of the procession was led by the clergy of the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul in Peterhof, Archpriest Mikhail Teryushov and Vladimir Chornobay.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 11. I Have Approached This Subject in Greater Detail in J. D
    NOTES Introduction 11. I have approached this subject in greater detail in J. D. White, Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism (Basingstoke and London, 1996). 12. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 38, p. 180. 13. K. Marx, Grundrisse, translated by M. Nicolaus (Harmondsworth, 1973), p. 408. 14. N. I. Ziber, Teoriia tsennosti i kapitala D. Rikardo v sviazi s pozdneishimi dopolneniiami i raz"iasneniiami. Opyt kritiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniia (Kiev, 1871). 15. N. G. Chernyshevskii, ‘Dopolnenie i primechaniia na pervuiu knigu politicheskoi ekonomii Dzhon Stiuarta Millia’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 3 (Geneva, 1869); ‘Ocherki iz politicheskoi ekonomii (po Milliu)’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 4 (Geneva, 1870). Reprinted in N. G. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, Vol. IX (Moscow, 1949). 16. Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vols XI–XVI. 17. M. M. Kovalevskii, Obshchinnoe zemlevladenie, prichiny, khod i posledstviia ego razlozheniia (Moscow, 1879). 18. Marx to the editorial board of Otechestvennye zapiski, November 1877, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 196–201. 19. Marx to Zasulich, 8 March 1881, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 346–73. 10. It was published in the journal Vestnik Narodnoi Voli, no. 5 (1886). 11. D. Riazanov, ‘V Zasulich i K. Marks’, Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vol. 1 (1924), pp. 269–86. 12. N. F. Daniel'son, ‘Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshch- estvennogo khoziaistva’, Slovo, no. 10 (October 1880), pp. 77–143. 13. N. F. Daniel'son, Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshchestvennogo khozi- aistva (St Petersburg, 1893). 14. V. V. Vorontsov, Sud'by kapitalizma v Rossii (St Petersburg, 1882).
    [Show full text]
  • The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1970 The Root Mission to Russia, 1917. Alton Earl Ingram Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ingram, Alton Earl, "The Root Mission to Russia, 1917." (1970). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1786. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1786 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-3418 } INGRAM, Alton Earl, 1934- THE ROOT MISSION TO RUSSIA, 1917. [ [I' The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1970 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan !■ i I ■ 1 ■■ ■■ ■■ !■ ■■ !■■■■! ■' ....... THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE ROOT MISSION TO RUSSIA 1917 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Alton Earl Ingram B.A., Northeast Louisiana State College, 1958 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1961 May, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank his faculty advisor, professor Burl Noggle, for his assistance during the preparation of this dissertation and his wife, Mimi, who has given unlimited assistance, encouragement, and under standing throughout the entire course of his graduate program. TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Worker
    A paper of Marxist polemic and Marxist unity weekly New light on April theses: n Letters and debate workern Populism’s moment Lars t Lih focuses on Lenin’s n Left unity in Italy polemic with Plekhanov n China Miéville: review No 1168 Thursday August 31 2017 Towards a Communist Party of the European Union £1/€1.10 OUR LADY OF THE TABLOIDS 2 weekly August 31 2017 1168 worker LETTERS Letters may have been Alongside this he rejected any political dumping various manure heaps of are betraying most needs of both than winning local parliamentary shortened because of support to the provisional government, deception and duplicity - in harness our domestic and the international elections. space. Some names critical or otherwise, and put forward with simple hypocrisy - as it did so. working class. Indeed, doing so Speakers at Compass events may have been changed the perspective of “a patient, Here’s a selection. in arguably comparable manner to include Ed Balls, Derek Simpson, systematic and persistent explanation” Via appearances at the head of Corbynist Labour - even if not as Hilary Benn, Hazel Blears, Ed Opportunism that soviets are “the only possible form memorial services and marches outright poisonously as any ‘royal’ Miliband, Dave Prentis, Frances I attended the Communist Party of Great of revolutionary government”. Within for those who died in Barcelona’s families. O’Grady, Jon Cruddas, Jon Trickett Britain’s 2017 ‘Communist University’ about a month (according to Lih’s car-ramming attacks, the so-called Of course, we must dispatch all and Chuka Umunna. How to lose event - the first time I have done so in research) this was to manifest in the ‘king’ of Spain - alongside other of them to that proverbial dustbin elections, anyone? many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine the Great (1729–1796)
    7 ••• Catherine the Great (1729–1796) HILDE HOOGENBOOM As Empress Catherine the Great forged her own Russian identity, so did Russia. During Catherine’s reign from 1762 to 1796, Russia discovered itself not only as European, but as a multinational and multiconfessional empire, and as Russian. A German, Catherine, with her legendary practicality, Russified herself, and at the same time promoted her- self as a European ruler and Russia as a European nation. Yet she also inherited a vast Eurasian empire that doubled its population under her rule; until 1991, Russians and Russian Orthodox believers would make up less than fifty percent of its inhabitants. By the end of the eighteenth century, these tensions between Russia as a nation and as a diverse empire would come under pressure from new nationalist ideals. After she arrived in Russia on February 9, 1744, at age fourteen from a small German state, Princess Sophie Auguste Frederike von Anhalt-Zerbst converted from Lutheranism to Russian Orthodoxy on June 28, became Grand Duchess Ekaterina Alekseevna, and began to learn Russian; over a year later, on August 21, 1745, she married the heir to the throne. She was crowned Empress Catherine II on September 22, 1762, after she took power in a coup d’état on June 28 against her husband, Peter III (b. 1728, r. 1761–62)—the nephew of Empress Elizabeth I (b. 1709, r. 1741–61)— who was murdered. Peter III was half German, the son of Elizabeth’s sister Anna and Charles Frederick, the Duke of Holstein-Gottorp, and showed his devotion to King Frederick II (the Great) of Prussia (b.
    [Show full text]