DOCSLIB.ORG

Native American Cultures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Native American Cultures DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A SECTION 2 Native American Cultures What You Will Learn… If YOU were there... Main Ideas You live in the North American Southwest about 1,000 years ago. 1. Several early societies You’ve been working in the fields for several hours today. The maize developed in North America long before Europeans crop looks good this summer, and you are hoping for a successful explored the continent. harvest. After finishing your work, you walk home. The opening to 2. Geographic areas influenced Native American cultures. your house is in a cliff wall 30 feet above a canyon floor. You must 3. Native American cultures use ladders to get to the opening. shared beliefs about religion and land ownership. Do you like the location of your home? Why? The Big Idea Many diverse Native American cultures developed across the BUILDING BACKGROUND After crossing the land bridge from different geographic regions of North America. Asia during the Ice Age, hunter-gatherer groups spread into every region of North America. Many diverse cultures formed as Native Americans adapted to their different environments. Key Terms and People pueblos, p. 11 kivas, p. 11 totems, p. 12 Early Societies teepees, p. 14 The earliest people in North America were hunter-gatherers. After matrilineal, p. 14 5000 BC some of these people learned how to farm, and they set- Iroquois League, p. 14 tled in villages. Although less populated than South America and Mesoamerica, North America had many complex societies long before Europeans reached the continent. Use the graphic organizer online Anasazi to take notes on Native American By 1500 BC the people who lived in the North American South- cultures of North America. west, like those who lived in Mesoamerica, were growing maize. One of the early farm cultures in the Southwest was the Anasazi (ah-nuh-SAH-zee). The Anasazi lived in the Four Corners region, where present-day Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah meet. Anasazi farmers adapted to their dry environment and grew maize, beans, and squash. Over time, they began to use irrigation to increase food production. By the time the Anasazi settled in the area, they were already skilled basket makers. They wove straw, vines, and yucca to make containers for food and other items, and they eventually became skilled potters as well. 10 CHAPTER 1 DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A Anasazi Cliff Dwellings Dwellings like these were built into cliffs for safety. Often, ladders were needed to reach the buildings. The ladders could be removed, keeping invaders from reach- ing the dwelllings. The early Anasazi lived in pit houses dug They supported their large population with into the ground. After about AD 750 they agriculture and trade. They built large burial built pueblos , or aboveground houses made mounds to honor their dead. of a heavy clay called adobe. The Anasazi built The Hopewell culture had declined by these houses on top of each other, creating AD 700. Another culture, the Mississippian, large multistoried complexes. Some pueblos began to thrive in the same area. Skilled had several hundred rooms and could house farmers and traders, the Mississippian built 1,000 people. large settlements. Their largest city, Cahokia, The Anasazi often built their houses in was located near present-day Saint Louis, canyon walls and had to use ladders to enter Missouri. It had a population of 30,000. their homes. These cliff dwellings provided a The Mississippian built hundreds of strong defense against enemies. The Anasazi mounds for religious ceremonies. Cahokia also built kivas , underground ceremonial alone had more than 100 temple and burial chambers, at the center of each community. mounds. These mounds had flat tops, and Kivas were sacred areas used for religious cer- temples were built on top of the mounds. emonies. Some of these rituals focused on Many of the mounds were gigantic. Monks the life-giving forces of rain and maize. Mound, near Collinsville, Illinois, for exam- The Anasazi thrived for hundreds of ple, was 100 feet high and covered 16 acres. years. After AD 1300, however, they began to Several other mound-building cultures abandon their villages. Scholars believe that thrived in eastern North America. More than drought, disease, or raids by nomadic tribes 10,000 mounds have been found in the Ohio from the north may have caused the Anasazi River valley alone. Some of these mounds are to move away from their pueblos. shaped like birds and snakes. The mound- building cultures had declined by the time Mound Builders European explorers reached the Southeast. Their Several farming societies developed in the societies no longer existed by the early 1700s. eastern part of North America after 1000 BC. The Hopewell lived along the Missis- READING CHECK Summarizing Why did sippi, Ohio, and lower Missouri river valleys. some Native American groups build mounds? THE WORLD BEFORE THE OPENING OF THE ATLANTIC 11 DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-B 20˚W 4aa 00 /26/04 10 Native American Culture 30˚W Areas oof - Bering Inuit Researchers use culture areas—the Pr geographic Sea locations that influenced societies—toF5 help MapQuest.com/HRW Inuit them describe ancient Nativeah06se_c01map American peo- Ingalik hool - American History 40˚W ples. North America is dividedSc into several Han Saschutkenne cle culture areas. Cir Aleut Inuit ctic 60˚N Native American Culture Areas Ar North and Northwest Middle West and Southwest Eyak Dogrib Inuit 50˚W The far north of North America is divided into Farther south along the Pacific coast was the Ta gish the Arctic and Subarctic culture areas. Few California region, which included the area plants grow in the Arctic because the ground is between the Pacific and the Sierra Nevada Tlingit always frozen beneath a thin top layer of soil. mountain range. Food sources were plenti- Inuit Hudson Slave This harsh environment was home to two ful, so farming was not necessary. One major Chipewyan Bay 50˚N groups of people, the Inuit and the Aleut. The plant food was acorns, which were ground Beaver To ngass Naskapi Beothuk Inuit lived in present-day northern Alaska and into flour. People also fished and hunted deer Carrier Swampy Haisla Canada. Their homes were igloos, hide tents, and other game. Most Native Americans in Cree Haida and huts. The Aleut, whose home was in west- the California region lived in groups of fami- Montagnais Heiltsuk ern and southern Alaska, lived in multifamily lies of about 50 to 300. Among these groups, NORTH Kwakiutl AMERICA Micmac houses that were partially underground. The including the Hupa, Miwok, and Yokuts, Nootka Shuswap Squamish two groups shared many cultural features, more than 100 languages were spoken. Makah Nooksack Chimakum Plains Plains Algonquian Coast Blackfoot Cree Ojibway 60˚W including language. Both groups survived by The area east of the Sierra Nevada, the Columbia Massachuset Salish Ottawa Wampanoag Spokane R Narragansett Pequot fishing and hunting large mammals. The Aleut Great Basin, received little rain. To survive, Chinook Ya kima O Huron Mohegan 40˚N C Mandan Great Lakes Mohawk Klickitat Walla Walla Nez Oneida and Inuit also depended on dogs for many Native Americans adapted to the drier climate Percé K Crow Onondaga Y IroquoisCayuga N Ya quina Seneca tasks, such as hunting and pulling sleds. by gathering seeds, digging roots, and trap- Santee Sauk E Molala Northern M Sioux Potawatomi Paiute Te ton Sioux W South of the Arctic lies the Subarctic, ping small animals for food. Most groups in Umpqua O Fox Modoc Cheyenne Kickapoo S To lowa Northern U Delaware home to groups such as the Dogrib and Mon- this area, including the Paiute, Shoshone, and Shoshone Omaha Susquehanna Hupa Achomawi N Iowa Miami Maidu Washo Pawnee tagnais peoples. While they followed the sea- Ute, spoke the same language. T Illinois Yuki A Wappo Western Arapaho Missouri Powhatan The Southwest culture region included I Shawnee sonal migrations of deer, these peoples lived Shoshone N ATLANTIC Miwok Kansa Cahokia in shelters made of animal skins. At other the present-day states of Arizona and New Ute S Costanoan Mono OCEAN Osage Cheraw times, they lived in villages made up of log Mexico, and parts of Colorado and Texas. Esselen Kawaiisu Cherokee 30˚N Yo kuts Hopi (Pueblo) Apache Chickasaw Pueblo groups, such as the Hopi and Zuni, Kiowa Cusabo houses. Farther south, the Kwakiutl and the Chumash Navajo Tu skegee Mohave Chinook thrived, thanks to the rich supply lived there. Like the Anasazi, these Native Zuni (Pueblo) Creek Comanche Alabama Wichita of game animals, fish, and wild plants that Americans also adapted to a dry climate. The Apache Choctaw Yuma Caddo Apalachee allowed large populations to increase with- Pueblo irrigated the land and grew maize, Nakipa Suma Mobile Pima To nkawa out the need for farming. squash, and beans. These crops were vital to Jumano Cochimi Native Americans in the Pacific North- southwestern peoples. The Pueblo religion Seri Seminole Tarahumara Karankawa Calusa FOCUS ON west carved images of totems — ancestor or focused on two key areas of Pueblo life, rain Ignacieno Ya qui READING Gulf of Mexico 70˚W animal spirits—on tall, wooden poles. Totem and maize. The Pueblo performed religious er What is the Canc pic of definition of poles held great religious and historical signif- rituals hoping to bring rain and a successful Tro Ta ino Waicura Lagunero totems according icance for Native Americans of the Northwest. maize crop to their peoples. 20˚N to this sentence? Feasts called potlatches were another unique, Pueblo peoples were settled and built mul- Guachichil Caribbean or unusual, aspect of these Native Americans’ tistoried houses out of adobe bricks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Gregory Oregon 0171N 12796.Pdf
    CHUNKEY, CAHOKIA, AND INDIGENOUS CONFLICT RESOLUTION by ANNE GREGORY A THESIS Presented to the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2020 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anne Gregory Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflict Resolution This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program by: Kirby Brown Chair Eric Girvan Member and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2020. ii © 2020 Anne Gregory This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii THESIS ABSTRACT Anne Gregory Master of Science Conflict and Dispute Resolution June 2020 Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflicts Resolution Chunkey, a traditional Native American sport, was a form of conflict resolution. The popular game was one of several played for millennia throughout Native North America. Indigenous communities played ball games not only for the important culture- making of sport and recreation, but also as an act of peace-building. The densely populated urban center of Cahokia, as well as its agricultural suburbs and distant trade partners, were dedicated to chunkey. Chunkey is associated with the milieu surrounding the Pax Cahokiana (1050 AD-1200 AD), an era of reduced armed conflict during the height of Mississippian civilization (1000-1500 AD). The relational framework utilized in archaeology, combined with dynamics of conflict resolution, provides a basis to explain chunkey’s cultural impact.
    [Show full text]
  • NSF 03-021, Arctic Research in the United States
    This document has been archived. Home is Where the Habitat is An Ecosystem Foundation for Wildlife Distribution and Behavior This article was prepared The lands and near-shore waters of Alaska remaining from recent geomorphic activities such by Page Spencer, stretch from 48° to 68° north latitude and from 130° as glaciers, floods, and volcanic eruptions.* National Park Service, west to 175° east longitude. The immense size of Ecosystems in Alaska are spread out along Anchorage, Alaska; Alaska is frequently portrayed through its super- three major bioclimatic gradients, represented by Gregory Nowacki, USDA Forest Service; Michael imposition on the continental U.S., stretching from the factors of climate (temperature and precipita- Fleming, U.S. Geological Georgia to California and from Minnesota to tion), vegetation (forested to non-forested), and Survey; Terry Brock, Texas. Within Alaska’s broad geographic extent disturbance regime. When the 32 ecoregions are USDA Forest Service there are widely diverse ecosystems, including arrayed along these gradients, eight large group- (retired); and Torre Arctic deserts, rainforests, boreal forests, alpine ings, or ecological divisions, emerge. In this paper Jorgenson, ABR, Inc. tundra, and impenetrable shrub thickets. This land we describe the eight ecological divisions, with is shaped by storms and waves driven across 8000 details from their component ecoregions and rep- miles of the Pacific Ocean, by huge river systems, resentative photos. by wildfire and permafrost, by volcanoes in the Ecosystem structures and environmental Ring of Fire where the Pacific plate dives beneath processes largely dictate the distribution and the North American plate, by frequent earth- behavior of wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • Subregional and Regional Approaches for Disaster Resilience
    United Nations ESCAP/76/14 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 3 March 2020 Original: English Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Seventy-sixth session Bangkok, 21 May 2020 Item 5 (d) of the provisional agenda* Review of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific: disaster risk reduction Subregional and regional approaches for disaster resilience Note by the secretariat Summary As climate uncertainties grow, Asia and the Pacific faces an increasingly complex disaster riskscape. In the Asia-Pacific Disaster Report 2019: The Disaster Riskscape across Asia-Pacific – Pathways for Resilience, Inclusion and Empowerment, the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific provided a comprehensive overview of the regional riskscape, identifying the region’s main hotspots and options for action. Based on the findings, the present document contains highlights of the changing geography of disasters together with the associated multi-hazard risk hotspots at the subregional level, namely, South-East Asia, South and South-West Asia, the Pacific small island developing States, North and Central Asia, and North and East Asia. For each subregion, the document provides specific solution-oriented resilience-building approaches. In this regard, the document contains information about the opportunities to build resilience provided by subregional and regional cooperation and a discussion of the secretariat’s responses under the aegis of the Asia-Pacific Disaster Resilience Network. The Commission may wish to review the present document and provide guidance for the future work of the secretariat. I. Introduction 1. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development provides a blueprint for development, including ending poverty, fighting inequalities and tackling climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1985 Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R. Polhemus University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Polhemus, Richard R., "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1985. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald F. Schroedl, Jefferson Chapman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled 11Mississippian Architecture: Temporal , Technolog ical, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site ( 40MR6) •11 I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts , with a major in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Ocmulgee National Monument
    FINAL REPORT September 2014 Ethnographic Overview and Assessment of Ocmulgee National Monument for the National Park Service Task Agreement No. P11AT51123 Deborah Andrews Peter Collings Department of Anthropology University of Florida Dayna Bowker Lee 1 I. Introduction, by Deborah Andrews 6 II. Background: The History of Ocmulgee National Monument 8 A. The Geography of Place 8 B. Preservation and Recognition of Ocmulgee National Monument 10 1. National Monument Designation 10 2. Depression Era Excavations 13 C. Research on and about Ocmulgee National Monument 18 III. Ethnohistory and Archaeology of Ocmulgee National Monument 23 A. The Occupants and Features of the Site 23 1. The Uchee Trading Path 24 2. PaleoIndian, Archaic and Woodland Eras 27 3. The Mississippian Mound Builders 37 4. The Lamar Focus and Migration 47 5. Proto-historic Creek and Spanish Contact 56 6. Carolina Trading Post and English Contact 59 7. The Yamassee War 64 8. Georgia Colony, Treaties and Removal 66 B. Historic Connections, Features and Uses of the Site 77 1. The City of Macon 77 2. Past Historic Uses of the Site 77 a. The Dunlap Plantation 78 b. Civil War Fortification 80 c. Railroads 81 2 d. Industry and Clay Mining 83 e. Interstate 16 84 f. Recreation and Education 85 C. Population 87 IV. Contemporary Views on the Ocmulgee National Monument Site, by Dayna Bowker Lee 93 A. Consultation 93 B. Etvlwu: The Tribal Town 94 C. The Upper and Lower Creek 98 D. Moving the Fires: The Etvlwv in Indian Territory, Oklahoma 99 E. Okmulgee in the West 104 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • My Friend, the Volcano (Adapted from the 2004 Submarine Ring of Fire Expedition)
    New Zealand American Submarine Ring of Fire 2007 My Friend, The Volcano (adapted from the 2004 Submarine Ring of Fire Expedition) FOCUS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STUDENTS Ecological impacts of volcanism in the Mariana 30 and Kermadec Islands KEY WORDS GRADE LEVEL Ring of Fire 5-6 (Life Science/Earth Science) Asthenosphere Lithosphere FOCUS QUESTION Magma What are the ecological impacts of volcanic erup- Fault tions on tropical island arcs? Transform boundary Convergent boundary LEARNING OBJECTIVES Divergent boundary Students will be able to describe at least three Subduction beneficial impacts of volcanic activity on marine Tectonic plate ecosystems. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Students will be able to explain the overall tec- The Submarine Ring of Fire is an arc of active vol- tonic processes that cause volcanic activity along canoes that partially encircles the Pacific Ocean the Mariana Arc and Kermadec Arc. Basin, including the Kermadec and Mariana Islands in the western Pacific, the Aleutian Islands MATERIALS between the Pacific and Bering Sea, the Cascade Copies of “Marianas eruption killed Anatahan’s Mountains in western North America, and numer- corals,” one copy per student or student group ous volcanoes on the western coasts of Central (from http://www.cdnn.info/eco/e030920/e030920.html) America and South America. These volcanoes result from the motion of large pieces of the AUDIO/VISUAL MATERIALS Earth’s crust known as tectonic plates. None Tectonic plates are portions of the Earth’s outer TEACHING TIME crust (the lithosphere) about 5 km thick, as Two or three 45-minute class periods, plus time well as the upper 60 - 75 km of the underlying for student research mantle.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean
    NATURAL DISASTERS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 2000 - 2019 1 Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is the second most disaster-prone region in the world 152 million affected by 1,205 disasters (2000-2019)* Floods are the most common disaster in the region. Brazil ranks among the 15 548 On 12 occasions since 2000, floods in the region have caused more than FLOODS S1 in total damages. An average of 17 23 C 5 (2000-2019). The 2017 hurricane season is the thir ecord in terms of number of disasters and countries affected as well as the magnitude of damage. 330 In 2019, Hurricane Dorian became the str A on STORMS record to directly impact a landmass. 25 per cent of earthquakes magnitude 8.0 or higher hav S America Since 2000, there have been 20 -70 thquakes 75 in the region The 2010 Haiti earthquake ranks among the top 10 EARTHQUAKES earthquak ory. Drought is the disaster which affects the highest number of people in the region. Crop yield reductions of 50-75 per cent in central and eastern Guatemala, southern Honduras, eastern El Salvador and parts of Nicaragua. 74 In these countries (known as the Dry Corridor), 8 10 in the DROUGHTS communities most affected by drought resort to crisis coping mechanisms. 66 50 38 24 EXTREME VOLCANIC LANDSLIDES TEMPERATURE EVENTS WILDFIRES * All data on number of occurrences of natural disasters, people affected, injuries and total damages are from CRED ME-DAT, unless otherwise specified. 2 Cyclical Nature of Disasters Although many hazards are cyclical in nature, the hazards most likely to trigger a major humanitarian response in the region are sudden onset hazards such as earthquakes, hurricanes and flash floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide to Florida's
    Teacher’s Guide to Florida’s Native People Inquiry Boxes: Museum on the move FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SW 34th Street & Hull Road on the University of Florida campus, Gainesville, FL Monday – Saturday 10 a.m. – 5 p.m. • Sunday & Holidays 1 p.m. – 5 p.m. (352) 846-2000 ext. 214 • www.flmnh.ufl.edu 2 www.flmnh.ufl.edu © 2002 Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida This Teacher’s Guide is made possible by a grant from the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Historical Museums Grants-in-Aid Program Acknowledgments This guide was produced by the Florida Museum of Natural History under the direction of Marilyn M. Roberts, Education Programs Coordinator Graphic Designer . .Pat Klaus Writer and Copy Editor . .Jeanne Chamberlin Writer and Copy Editor . .Darcie MacMahon Copy Editor . .Dr. Betty Dunckel Camp Museum Artist . .Merald Clark Museum Photographers . .Jeff Gage, Tammy Johnson Seminole Photographers . .Ernie Tiger, Elrod Bowers Seminole Graphic Designer . .Melissa Sherman Canoe Race Illustration . .Andrew Works Cover Illustration . .Allen Cheuvront Florida Heritage Education Program, Department of State, Division of Historical Resources In addition, I would like to thank the following people at FLMHH for their contributions to the Museum on the Move: Inquiry Boxes program: Dr. Douglas S. Jones, FLMNH Director Division of Exhibits and Public Programs Kurt Auffenberg • Jeannette Carlisle • Brian Chamberlain Ron Chesser • Lorraine Duerden • Susan Jarzen Dale Johnson • Tom Kyne • Robert Leavy Dr. Bruce J. MacFadden • John Patterson • Erika Simons • Charlene Smith FLMNH Volunteers and Docents Division of Collections and Research Sarah Brix • Richard Franz • Dr. David M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Underwater Archaeology of Paleolandscapes, Apalachee Bay, Florida Author(S): Michael K
    Society for American Archaeology The Underwater Archaeology of Paleolandscapes, Apalachee Bay, Florida Author(s): Michael K. Faught Source: American Antiquity, Vol. 69, No. 2 (Apr., 2004), pp. 275-289 Published by: Society for American Archaeology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128420 Accessed: 14-09-2016 18:19 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128420?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Society for American Archaeology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Antiquity This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:19:45 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms REPORTSX THE UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY OF PALEOLANDSCAPES, APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA Michael K. Faught Submerged prehistoric sites investigated in northwest Florida along the margins of the drowned Aucilla River channel (or PaleoAucilla) extend our understanding ofprehistoric settlement patterns and paleolandscape utilization. Bifacial and uni- facial tools indicate Late Paleoindian and Early Archaic logistical activities at these sites, as well as later Middle Archaic occupations.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]