United Nations Rc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United Nations Rc UNITED NATIONS RC UNEP/FAO/RC/CRC.6/5/Add.1 Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Distr.: General 1 December 2009 Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and English only Pesticides in International Trade Chemical Review Committee Sixth meeting Geneva, 15–19 March 2010 Item 5 (b) (i) of the provisional agenda* Listing of chemicals in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention: review of notifications of final regulatory actions to ban or severely restrict a chemical: amitraz Amitraz Note by the Secretariat Addendum Supporting documentation provided by the European Community The Secretariat has the honour to provide, in the annex to the present note, documentation received from the European Community to support its notification of final regulatory action for amitraz as a pesticide. The documentation has been reproduced as received, without formal editing by the Secretariat. * UNEP/FAO/RC/CRC.6/1. K0953651 040110 For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/FAO/RC/CRC.6/5/Add.1 Annex 1. Commission decision of 12 February 2004 concerning the non-inclusion of amitraz in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance (2004/141/EC) Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/existactive/oj_amitraz.pdf 2. Review report for the active substance amitraz: Finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 4 July 2003 in support of a decision concerning the non-inclusion of amitraz in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/existactive/list_amitraz.pdf 3. Excerpt of a report of a tripartite meeting between the European Commission, Austria as Rapporteur Member State and the main data submitter: Amitraz 4. List of end points: Amitraz 5. Monograph prepared in the context of inclusion of following active substance in Annex I of the Council Directive 91/414/EEC: Amitraz. Volume 1: Report and proposed decision. 6. Amitraz: Addendum II to Volume 1 to the Draft Assessment Report and Proposed Decision of Austria prepared in the context of the possible inclusion of the above mentioned active substance in Annex I of Council Directive 91/414/EEC 7. Amitraz: Addendum II to Volume 3 Annex B: Summary, Scientific Evaluation and Assessment 8. Excerpt of the report of a European Commission Co-ordination (ECCO) peer review meeting: Concise outline report of ECCO 78 peer review meeting 9. Excerpt of the report of a European Commission Co-ordination (ECCO) peer review meeting: Concise outline report of ECCO 80 peer review meeting 10 Excerpt of the report of a European Commission Co-ordination (ECCO) peer review meeting: Concise outline report of ECCO 82 peer review meeting 11. Excerpt of the report of a European Commission Co-ordination (ECCO) peer review meeting: Concise outline report of ECCO 84 peer review meeting 2 17.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 46/35 COMMISSION DECISION of 12 February 2004 concerning the non-inclusion of amitraz in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the with- drawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance (notified under document number C(2004) 332) (Text with EEA relevance) (2004/141/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (4) In accordance with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92, Austria, being the designated rapporteur Member State, submitted on 6 January 1998 to the Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Commission the report of its assessment of the informa- Community, tion submitted by the notifiers in accordance with Article 6(1) of that Regulation. Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on (5) On receipt of the report of the rapporteur Member 1 the market ( ), as last amended by Commission Directive 2003/ State, the Commission undertook consultations with 2 119/EC ( ), and in particular the third and the fourth sub- experts of the Member States as well as with the main paragraph of Article 8(2) thereof, notifier Bayer CropScience, as provided for in Article 7(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92. Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the (6) The Commission organised two tripartite meeting with implementation of the first stage of the programme of work the main data submitter and the rapporteur Member referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC State for this active substance on 9 June 2000 and on concerning the placing of plant protection products on the 21 March 2003. market (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2266/ 2000 (4), and in particular Article 7(3A)(b) thereof, (7) The assessment report prepared by Austria has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission Whereas: within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health. This review was finalised on 4 July 2003 in the format of the Commission review report for (1) Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provided for the amitraz. Commission to carry out a programme of work for the examination of the active substances used in plant protection products which were already on the market (8) Assessments made on the basis of the information on 25 July 1993. Detailed rules for the carrying out of submitted have not demonstrated that it may be this programme were established in Regulation (EEC) No expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, 3600/92. plant protection products containing amitraz satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC. In particular, Article 5(2)(b) (2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 933/94 of 27 April provides that an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for man 1994 laying down the active substances of plant protec- must be taken into account in deciding on the inclusion tion products and designating the rapporteur Member of an active substance in Annex I. In setting the ADI the States for the implementation of Commission Regulation possible neurological effects of amitraz had to be consid- 5 (EEC) No 3600/92 ( ), as last amended by Regulation ered. These effects were also considered for setting the 6 (EC) No 2230/95 ( ), designated the active substances Acute Reference Dose, i.e. the estimate of the amount of which should be assessed in the framework of Regu- the substance that can be ingested over a short period of lation (EEC) No 3600/92, designated a Member State to time without appreciable health risk to the consumer. It act as rapporteur in respect of the assessment of each has not been demonstrated for the proposed uses that substance and identified the producers of each active consumers might not be exposed to amitraz exceeding substance who submitted a notification in due time. the Acute Reference Dose. A probabilistic risk assess- ment was prepared by the notifier. It must however be taken into consideration that agreed criteria for the inter- (3) Amitraz is one of the 89 active substances designated in pretation of such a probabilistic risk assessment are not Regulation (EC) No 933/94. yet established and it would not be appropriate, in view of the possible risks, to delay decision-making further 1 ( ) OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1. until such criteria are agreed. (2) OJ L 325, 12.12.2003, p. 41. (3) OJ L 366, 15.12.1992, p. 10. (4) OJ L 259, 13.10.2000, p. 27. (5) OJ L 107, 28.4.1994, p. 8. (9) Amitraz should therefore not be included in Annex I to (6) OJ L 225, 22.9.1995, p. 1. Directive 91/414/EEC. L 46/36EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.2.2004 (10) Measures should be taken to ensure that existing author- 2. from 17 February 2004 no authorisations for plant protec- isations for plant protection products containing amitraz tion products containing amitraz are granted or renewed are withdrawn within a prescribed period and are not under the derogation provided for in Article 8(2) of Direc- renewed and that no new authorisations for such tive 91/414/EEC; products are granted. 3. in relation to the uses listed in column B of the Annex, a Member State specified in column A may maintain in force (11) In the light of the information submitted to the Commis- authorisations for plant protection products containing sion it appears that, in the absence of efficient alterna- amitraz until 30 June 2007 provided that it: tives for certain limited uses in certain Member States, there is a need for further use of the active substance so (a) ensures that such plant protection products remaining as to enable the development of alternatives. It is there- on the market are relabelled in order to match the fore justified in the present circumstances to prescribe restricted use conditions; under strict conditions aimed at minimising risk a longer (b) imposes all appropriate risk mitigation measures to period for the withdrawal of existing authorisations for reduce any possible risks in order to ensure the protec- the limited uses considered as essential for which no effi- tion of human and animal health and the environment; cient alternatives appear currently to be available for the and control of harmful organisms.
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • New Subdivision of Cotton Production Area of Côte D'ivoire Based on The
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2021; 9(3): 50-57 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 New subdivision of cotton production area of Côte www.entomoljournal.com JEZS 2021; 9(3): 50-57 d’Ivoire based on the infestation of main © 2021 JEZS Received: 25-03-2021 arthropod pests Accepted: 27-04-2021 Kouakou Malanno National Center for Agronomic Kouakou Malanno, Bini Kouadio Kra Norbert, Ouattara Bala Mamadou Research, Cotton Research and Ochou Ochou Germain Station of Bouake, Entomology Laboratory, 01 BP 633 Bouaké 01, Côte d’Ivoire DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2021.v9.i3a.8689 Bini Kouadio Kra Norbert Abstract National Center for Agronomic Variations in populations of arthropod pests, under the influence of climate change, compromise the Research, Cotton Research effectiveness of the cotton phytosanitary protection strategy in Côte d'Ivoire. This study aims to establish Station of Bouake, Entomology a new classification of cotton production areas, on the basis of predominant pests. A monitoring was Laboratory, 01 BP 633 Bouaké therefore carried out from 2016 to 2019 in 400 farmers' fields. In these fields, surveys were conducted 01, Côte d’Ivoire weekly, from the 30th to the 122nd day after emergence. Data analysis, through Principal Component Analysis, identified four groups of localities. The first group includes the northeastern localities (4°W to Ouattara Bala Mamadou Department of Physical 5°W: 8°N to 10.5°N) such as Kong, Ouangolodougou, Sordi, Tiékpè, Kaouara. This area is characterized Geography, University Alassane by high infestations of most pests (jassid, white flies, exocarpic lepidoptera, endocarpic lepidoptera, Ouattara, Côte d'Ivoire phyllophagous lepidoptera and mites).
    [Show full text]
  • Optomotor Regulation of Ground Velocity in Moths During Flight to Sex Pheromone at Different Heights
    Physzologzcal Entomology (1982) 7,193-202 Optomotor regulation of ground velocity in moths during flight to sex pheromone at different heights L P S KUENEN and T. C BAKER Division of Toxicology and Physiology, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, U.S A ABSTRACT Males of two species of moths (Grapholitha molesta (Busck) and Hehothis virescens (F )) were flown in a sustained-flight tunnel in horizontal pheromone plumes The up-tunnel velocity of the moths increased with increasing height of flight and for G molesta was independent of tunnel wind velocities Use of moving ground patterns verified that the height of flight above the ground was the factor related to the changes in up-tunnel velocity. Even though up-tunnel velocity increased with incieased flight height, angular velocity of image motion did not. Males appeared to use visual cues from the ground pattern and from other sources to determine their up-tunnel velocities The relationship of preferred retinal velocities to optomotoi anemotaxis is discussed Key words. Wind tunnel, optomotor control, flight control, ground velocity, pheromone, flight height, retinal velocity, Graphohtha molesta, Hehothis virescens Introduction constant or 'preferred' retinal velocity the insect should exhibit changes in net ground Various aspects of the control of insect flight velocity (Fig 1) as it changes height above the behaviour have been examined, including the surf ace (Kennedy, 195 1) The independence use of vision by the insect to maintain a of ground velocity from changes
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Vernacular Names
    Appendix 1 Vernacular Names The vernacular names listed below have been collected from the literature. Few have phonetic spellings. Spelling is not helped by the difficulties of transcribing unwritten languages into European syllables and Roman script. Some languages have several names for the same species. Further complications arise from the various dialects and corruptions within a language, and use of names borrowed from other languages. Where the people are bilingual the person recording the name may fail to check which language it comes from. For example, in northern Sahel where Arabic is the lingua franca, the recorded names, supposedly Arabic, include a number from local languages. Sometimes the same name may be used for several species. For example, kiri is the Susu name for both Adansonia digitata and Drypetes afzelii. There is nothing unusual about such complications. For example, Grigson (1955) cites 52 English synonyms for the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) in the British Isles, and also mentions several examples of the same vernacular name applying to different species. Even Theophrastus in c. 300 BC complained that there were three plants called strykhnos, which were edible, soporific or hallucinogenic (Hort 1916). Languages and history are linked and it is hoped that understanding how lan- guages spread will lead to the discovery of the historical origins of some of the vernacular names for the baobab. The classification followed here is that of Gordon (2005) updated and edited by Blench (2005, personal communication). Alternative family names are shown in square brackets, dialects in parenthesis. Superscript Arabic numbers refer to references to the vernacular names; Roman numbers refer to further information in Section 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Literature on Lepidoptera
    1956 The Lepidopterists' News 121 RECENT LITERATURE ON LEPIDOPTERA (Under the supervision of PBTER F. BELLINGER) Under this heading are included abstracts of papers and books of interest to lepidop­ terists. The world's literature is searched systematically, and it is intended that every work on Lepidoptera published after 1946 will be noticed here; omissions of papers more than 3 or 4 years old should be called to Dr. BELLINGER'S attention. New genera and higher categories are shown in CAPITALS, with types in parentheses; new species and subspecies are noted, with type localities if given in print, Larval food plants are usually listed. Critical comments by abstractors may be made. Papers of only local interest and papers from The Lepidopterists' News are listed without abstract. Readers, particularly outside of North America, interested in assisting with this very large task, are invited to write Dr. BELLINGER (Osborn Zoological Lab., Yale Universiry, New Haven 11, Conn., U. S. A.) Abstractors' initials are as follows: [P.B.] - P. F. BELLIN­ GER; (I.e.] - I. F. B. COMMON; [W.c.] - W. C. COOK; [A.D.] -A. DIAKONOFF; [W.H.]- W. HACKMAN; [J .M.]-]. MOUCHA; [E.M.] - E. G. MUNROE; [N.O.]­ N. S. OBRAZTSOV; [C.R.]- C. 1. REMINGTON; (J.T.]- J. W. TILDEN; [P.V.]­ P. E. 1. VIETTE. B. SYSTEMATICS AND NOMENCLATURE Bauer, David 1., "A new race of Papilio indra from the Grand Canyon region." Lepid. News, vo!.9: pp.49-54, 1 pI. 10 Aug. 1955. Describes as new p, i, kaibabemis (Bright Angel Point, Ariz.) Bell, Ernest Layton, & Cyril Franklin dos Passos, "The lectotype of Megathymus aryxna Dyar (Lepidoptera, Megathymidre)." Amer.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- REFERENCE to CERTAIN UPIDOPTERA. Sunninghill, Ascot
    -1- THE CHEMOSTERILI8ATION OF INSECTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CERTAIN UPIDOPTERA. A thesis submitted by D.G.Campion, B.Sc. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London. 7 Imperial College Field Station, Sunninghill, Ascot, Berkshire. August, 1970. -2- STP,L.CT 1i4 potential chemosterilants were evaluated by injection application to the noctuid Diparopsis castanea. The most effective was tris-(l-aziridinyl) phosphine oxide (tepa). Sterility in male moths was permanent although the insects were sexually competitive. Male 4%utographa gamma were similarly sterilised. Both mating effectiveness and oviposition were reduced when female Diparopsis were injected with sterilising doses. Tepa also sterilised male Diparopsis when applied topically in acetone, after overnight contact on treated surfaces or by probing on aqueous solution. In all three instances the sterilised moths were sexually competitive. Male Diparopsis were attracted to virgin females confined in a prototype bait-station; but on arrival did not often probe until at least 3 days old. Unless probing occurred the moths were not sterilized by momentary contact. To facilitate chemosterilant penetration after momentary contact, certain oils were applied to male moths, but all reduced mating effectiveness. Results from population models suggested that the advantage of sterilising attracted males instead of killing them would be slight. Tepa was degraded rapidly when applied to male Diparopsis topically or by injection at temperatures prevailing under field conditions in Central .:,frica. Tepa treatment of female Diparopsis caused a degeneration of young oocytes within 3 days and a shrinkage of mature eggs. No marked effects on the testes of Diparopsis or Lutographa were noted after similar treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Economic Value of Arthropod Biological Control
    ©CAB International – for Steven Naranjo 4 Economic Value of Arthropod Biological Control STEVEN E. NARANJO1*, GEORGE B. FRISVOLD2 AND PETER C. ELLSWORTH3 1USDA-ARS, Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA; 2Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; 3Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Maricopa Agricultural Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA Integrated pest management (IPM) is the strategic control are very low, successful programmes have integration of multiple control tactics resulting in the resulted in essentially permanent pest control with amelioration of pest damage that takes into consid- very favourable economic outcomes (Cock et al., eration environmental safety, and the reduction of 2015; Naranjo et al., 2015). risk and favourable economic outcomes for growers A second approach – augmentative biological and society at large. For thousands of years, natural control – involves the initial (inoculation) or enemies of pests have been harnessed for crop pro- repeated (inundation) introduction of native or tection (Simmonds et al., 1976). Maximizing this exotic natural enemies to suppress pest populations. source of natural control is a foundational element Augmentative biological control has been widely in IPM for suppressing the growth of incipient pest and successfully deployed in many parts of the populations (Stern et al., 1959). Biological control world. It is perhaps most well known in protected has been defined as the purposeful use of natural agricultural production, particularly in Europe and enemies, such as predators, parasitoids and patho- in developing regions such as China, India and gens, to regulate another organism’s populations to Latin America (van Lenteren et al., 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of Helicoverpa Armigera in Africa
    NATURAL ENEMIES OF HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA IN AFRICA: - A REVIEW H. VAN DEN BERG J. K. WAAGE M. J. W. COCK NATURAL ENEMIES OF HEUCOVERPA ARM/GERA IN AFRICA -A REVIEW H. VAN DEN BERG J. K. WAAGE CA.B. International Institute of Biological Control Silwood Park, Ascot, UK M. J. W. COCK CA.B. International Institute of Biological Control Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Nairobi, Kenya Prepared as part of a project funded by the UK OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION This publication was prepared by: C.A.B International Institute of Biological Control Silwood Park Ascot Berks SL5 7PY U.K. ISBN 0 85198 621 8 ~ C.A.B International, 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Printed by The Chameleon Press Limited, 5-25 Burr Road, London SW18 4SG COH'rBH'rS PRll:I'ACB •••••••••••.•••.••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 ABSTRACT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• 4 PART :I 1. l:RTRODUCT:ION •••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 2. THJ: PBST •.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. 6 2.1 Taxonomy •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6 2.2 Life-history .....•.................................... 6 2.3 Bost-p~ants . 7 2.4 Phenology . 7 2.5 SlIIIIpling methods . 7 3. SAMPLl:NG NATURAL BHll:MIBS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 3.1 Parasitoids ................................•......•..•... 9 3.2 Predators ...............................••.•.•..•..•.• 12 3.3 Pathogens .....................................•..•••.• 13 3.4 Popul.ation studies . 13 4. SUMMARY or THJ: NATURAL BHll:MIZS 01' !!. AmaGBRA :IN Al'R:ICA •• 14 4.1 TaxODClIIlY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 4.2 Alternative hosts ...............................•••... 15 4.3 Distribution ..................................•••..... 17 4.4 Bost-plant associations . 18 4.5 seasona~ity ...•...•.•................................
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Helicoverpa Armigera</I> in Smallholder Crops in East Africa
    NATURAL CONTROL OF HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA IN SMALLHOLDER CROPS IN EAST AFRICA Promotor: Dr. J.C. van Lenteren Hoogleraar ind eEntomologie , in hetbijzonde r de Oecologiede r Insekten Co-promotor: Dr. J.K. Waage Ecologist Director, International Institute of Biological Control, Ascot, Verenigd Koninkrijk /ÜAJ08&>(. /£é1 Henk van den Berg Natural control of Helicoverpa armigera in smallholder crops in East Africa Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor in de Landbouw- en Milieuwetenschappen, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Dr. C.M. Karssen, in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 1oktobe r 1993 des namiddags te vier uur in de aula van de Landbouwuniversiteit te Wageningen CIP-DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Berg, Henk van den Natural control of Helicoverpa armigera in smallholder crops in East Africa / Henk van den Berg. - [S.l. : s.n.] Thesis Wageningen. - With ref. - With summary in Dutch. ISBN 90-5485-107-4 Subject headings: Helicoverpa armigera. BIBLIOTHEEFF LA£u)BOUWUNIVERS£rEOr EAGENJNGEM Aanmijn ouders Ajfjo$?o f, /6 6 9 Stellingen 1 Alleen de evaluatie van natuurlijke vijanden in relatie tot de 'sterftetabel' (lifetable) van een plaag geeft een goede indruk van de werkelijke rol van natuurlijke vijanden. Luck, R.F. , Shepard, B.M. & Kenmore, P.E. (1988) AnnualReview ofEntomology 33 , 367- 391. Bellows, T.S., van Driesche, R.G. & Elkinton, J.S. (1992) AnnualReview ofEntomology 37, 587-614. Dit proefschrift 2 Natuurlijke mortaliteit van Lepidoptera, bepaald middels veldbemonstering, wordt meestal sterk onderschat door te geringe aandacht voor bemonstering van het eistadium. De waarde van conclusies gebaseerd op sterftetabellen is daarom sterk afhankelijk van de wijze van bemonstering van het eistadium.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Long-Term Effects of Genetically Modified (GM)
    Cumulative long-term effects of genetically modified (GM) crops on human/animal health and the environment: risk assessment methodologies Reference: No 07-0402/2005/414455/MAR/B4 CUMULATIVE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) CROPS ON HUMAN/ANIMAL HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT: RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES REFERENCE: NO 07-0402/2005/414455/MAR/B4 Final Report 31/03/06 Christine Henry Central Science Laboratory Sand Hutton York YO41 1LZ. UK Main Project Contractors Christine Henry, Sarah Hugo, James Blackburn, Central Science Laboratory (CSL) David Nicholls, RM Consultants Ltd 1 Cumulative long-term effects of genetically modified (GM) crops on human/animal health and the environment: risk assessment methodologies Reference: No 07-0402/2005/414455/MAR/B4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The scientific evidence for long-term and cumulative effects of GM plant cultivation was reviewed. Currently available risk assessment methodologies were also reviewed and gaps in knowledge identified. Tools and techniques to fill these gaps have been identified, drawing on experience of risk assessment in other domains. Case studies were used to test and develop the risk assessment approaches, and to develop examples of monitoring and management measures. 2. Some areas of potential long-term risks and benefits were identified from the scientific literature but in fact there have been few comprehensive studies carried out in the field over the long-term that directly address long-term and cumulative effects. 3. Risk assessment methodologies for release of GMOs generally follow a case-by-case approach based on a scientific framework of assessment of hazards, potential for exposure, consequences of exposure and options for risk management.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW EVIDENCE on the ORIGIN of 1949, '950), and of Their Wild
    NEW EVIDENCEON THE ORIGIN OF THE OLD WORLD CO1TONS i. B. HUTCHINSON Empire Cotton Growing Corporation, Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, Uganda Received15.vi.53 I.INTRODUCTION INthe Evolution of Gossypium (Hutchinson, Silow and Stephens, 1947) it was suggested that the true cottons owe to human agencies their separation from the nearest wild species, their specific differentiation, and their striking evolutionary success. It followed that the whole of the diversification of the lint bearing species of Gossypium must be regarded as having taken place since the dawn of civilisation, and that the modern cottons represent the product of an extremely rapid evolutionary process. Further progress has now been made in the elucidation of the relationships of the Old World cottons (Hutchinson, 1949, '950), and of their wild relatives (Knight, '949; Douwes, I 951; Douwes and Cuany, 1951, and 1952), and a fresh assessment of the evidence on the origin and antiquity of the diploid cottons is therefore appropriate. 2.THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE DIPLOID COTTONS TO THE WILD SPECIES Thereare two groups of wild species of Gossypium native to Africa and Asia, the Anomala and the Stocksiana. Since the Old World cottons are fairly closely related to the former, and only very distantly to the latter, an understanding of the relationships of the wild species is a .prerequisite to a discussion of the origin of the cottons. Recently Douwes (1951) has shown that G. somalense belongs in the Stocksiana, and Knight (ig) has recorded that it is distributed from northern Kenya to British Somaliland, and across the northern Sudan as far west as Ennedi in the eastern districts of French Equatorial Africa.
    [Show full text]