Aliens at Harwell
CEU eTD Collection Secon Supervisor: Professor Hall Karl ALIENS AT HARWELL: BRITISH REPRESENTATIONS HARWELL: AT BRITISH ALIENS OF SCIENCE NUCLEAR d Reader: Professor Katalind Reader:Professor In requirements fulfilment for ofthe partial thedegreeof AND
NUCLEAR
Central European University Str DepartmentHistory of a Budapest, Hungary ner Ma Jelena Ćulibrk Submitted to Submitted
SCIENTISTS, 1945 SCIENTISTS, ster ofArts 2015. By
-
1961
CEU eTD Collection wr not bemade the without aany partmade. ofsuch copiesinaccordance Further copiesmade the CentralLibrary. page from Europeanmay Details thelibrarian. obtained This form be must part, may accordance be only made and withthe instructionsgiven in lodgedin Author by the restsCopyright thesis ofthis withthe Author. by Copies thetext any in process, either infull Statement Copyright of
itten permission of the Author. permissionitten ofthe ii
with such instructionsmaywith such
or CEU eTD Collection on representations servedas andease servedperplexities public‘s British totheover nuclearFurthermore, energy. these shows howthe ofBritishscience representations and nuclear n order post todisplay British guidinginterestedsecuringand in ofthisformidable therepresentations project national in British nuclear program. The British post establishment, thesis this arguesCockcroftmarkers thatHarwell and the as for were used n newsreelsI and1950sscience fiction cinema, Ina governmental comparativenews newspapers, of photography, study pamphlets, documents, historiographyargues f that ICockcroft‘s first director.Harwell‘s drawmy image, methodologyfrom current the bombings to thehumanizing and ap peaceful decreased over 1945to1961,when nuclearand in thepublic‘s energy Nagasaki fascination atomic bombs early InI dissertation, this ofnuclearthe representations study science uclear project. Although this is a is microuclear history this a nuclearresearch project.singleBritish of Although
the changing production space, ofBritish Harwell‘s ―hub‖ post for
British . How did nuclear science go from awe andgo didnuclearfromhorrorNagasakiHiroshima science awe . How and of
post
post - war environm - war
recruitment tool scientific environment or an equal study of both verbalor an both study equal andvisual historical of reminiscence. - warscientific competenceatand excellence. ―Aliens Harwell‖ ent . Temporal is framework - s war government andwar (Labour Conservativ
for the youngfor thegraduates whowere science lamenting Abstract plication of plication w iii
eave .
complex representationscomplex ofthe British
- nuclear war research, nuclear and John
from the explosion offrom Hiroshima the explosion uclear scientists wereuclear scientists positive
energy? and
nuclear
I restrict
scientists the study e) were
in the t o
CEU eTD Collection as ifyourThis thesis, would be my it impossible was sanity, for not love. cry fellow CEUcolleagues ―pity and Skype for s parties‖ over support from Belgrade.M owe mym to thanks gratefulindividu thefollowing to support. backbreaking during support and second reader instruction. Dr ifwas it for commitmenttoacademicimpossible not these institutions‘ excellence This researchto the isindebted Cambridge), TheLibrary,at Archives National British Kew, theand ofcommitment thewonderfulat staff the andhelpful Churchill College (University of Archives and -
buddy much to the Thes Iam grateful IFirst, to owe thanks
Special thanks research .
-
, and Jian , and Jian International Vis needed is writing isfun,but
to the comfort of yourto theof comfort home. thankstomy Special Dr friend Dr .
Hall‘s course in April 2015 in April .
encouragement. Iencouragement. amDr particularlygrateful for StranerKatalin
to m yyear friend of best ten Zh
to a :
y i friends my ng, for c ng, for Nusi Nagyhá y otherfriend best
egradFund supportingfurther for MAproject. my
the thesis . I. getwas happy always day to aftera back long of The AtomicAge
Central European Universitygrantinggenerousfor fellowshipa sometimes above omforting meduring a particularly als who
n London,n Dejan and Milan Skendžić provided superb academic guidance, academic draftprovided superb numerous supervisor Dr upporting research my asfrom Aswell D.C. zi for being an for awesome beingzi dinner - Acknowledgments mentioned institutions. ―Alien mentioned institutions.
have
th s, Momir Iseni for s, Momir , reatened unforeseen drawbacks by
Viktor Vi was particuwas
helped me helped iv .
Karl Hall for Hall hispatientKarl gui lotijević
larly
regain strength
his uncondi inspiring for this thesis this for inspiring ,
for .
Straner‘s enthusiasm and Straner‘s dreadful night onthe metro. dreadful organizing s atHarwell‖ the organizer , British Film Institute.British Film for me taking care of
to finish this thesis. I thesis. this to finish . tional
Judit DruksJudit for the dance, supportand dance,
I the admire
. However, IHowever, . am long my and friends and
love and archival
. would be
- even better distance distance . My - readings
CEU eTD Collection withstood youngthat will commence femalebravely scholars and indepe my and friend CEUcolleague Marko Miljković I toanticipate readers my thesis urge theforthcoming PhD research th establishments chemistry. chemistry failingcoursesand for tounder ― ―Vinča interlude Yugoslav project, e.g.Yugo‘s nuclear haven‖ to establishments case (inhis for reading know the co to my mother, Mira Skenderović for o for providing me was atmylowest. scientific
in April 2015, amidst yourin April2015,amidst busy schedule. This thesis isdedicatedThis thesis tomy nieces My IAt last,my am indebted to Iwould alsotothank like
gra
young post yourobstacles. personal vocation‖ This thesis is anearly ode tothe inspiration post is This thesis my drafts. my - or ndfather comfort dinates backtomy planetdinates ―home ,‖ Thank youThank my grandfatherhis basketballcommenced bidfarewell my careerand to
lasting day tothis -
war Skenderović Bartul Dr. and support and
roughoutworld. the science ,
t he YugoslavInstitute Nuclear at
for the love friendship, for Dr
family for teaching me the importance of ―home.‖ Thank youfamily theimportance for ―home.‖ Thank teaching me of graduates.In Professor Pavle 1952, Savić . during thesiswriting
Jann Matlock Jann
ur long walks, bed long walks, ur John . I for the am sorry stand the beauty (and logic?) behind beauty logic?) stand the (and —
Cockcroft)
i Anđela (12), Anjaand (9)(12), Anđela P IfVinča istheYugoslav counterpart to s v .
. a ‖
n ,
I 2014,when prepfor December the talksin Special thanks tomy sister Tamara Ćulibrk example ofhow post example ,
and for finding time to haveandfinding for dinner to time
mentored my grandfathermentored my
in May 2015 -
time snug time
low marks in my highlow marks my in
on the Yugoslav nuclearon theYugoslav project by - war science graduates sciencewar found in
Vinča) providVinča) ndently as the three of you threendently as the of gles .
Iespeciallygrateful am
and love. and - warresearch etra (3) etra(3) Szabadka, June 2015. Szabadka, June
ed a―safe scientific
(di
organic rector the of - . During his
school Ialways —
in hope
Harwell,
on
Author with
a
-
CEU eTD Collection vi
-
Trust me. IyouTrust me. am stories. telling Jeanette Winterson, Jeanette Winterson,
The Passion
CEU eTD Collection
( Anon. Harwell. London: Her Majesty‘s StationeryOffice, 1956,57) ― Alien at Harwell‖ vii
CEU eTD Collection Bibliography Filmography Primary sources CONCLUSION complex, 1946 CHAPTER “intimate” an University: IV.military Harwell Representing scientist, 1945 CHAPTER representations Cockcroft: apost III.Constructing British of the documentsnewsreels 1950sashistorical of CHAPTER contesting verbal: science visual, British II.Reading cinema fiction and CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 4.2. Harwellian life onnewsreels andindocuments 4.1. British SF ―creature 3.4. Cockcroft Koepler asProfessor in 3.3. Cockcroft onfilm Labor3.2. shortage Cockcroft and ―the magnet‖ 3.1 2.2. British 1950sscience fiction cinema 2.1. Thepost British 1.3. 1.2. 1.1. . Constructing Cockcroft
Jacob BronowskiJacob obligations andthe ofa sc Michaelpost and Polanyi the Cultures The Two
...... Science in post Science in - –
1961
......
1961 ......
......
......
...... - war governmentpubl andnuclear
...... - debate inpost features‖:―Big Screeningthethreat British of Science‖ nature on
- ...... war Britain: Michael Britain: war Jacob Polanyi and Bronowski ...... - Table of Contents of Table war of science organization ...... - Spaceways war Britain ......
...... viii
......
...... ientist (1953, UK)
......
......
...... icity
......
......
......
......
......
...... - ...... - industrial industrial war nuclearwar ......
......
97 96 94 87 77 67 67 63 60 53 47 43 39 32 27 23 19 15
9 1
CEU eTD Collection
A.E.R.E. V WWII M.I.5 GBN CND CCA ASA UCL RAF CFU - MIT IRD CIA SFS PM MP OH FO J Day J PP SF
Victory Japan over Atomic Energy Establishment Research Abbreviations Massachusetts InstituteMassachusetts ofTechnology Campaign for Nucle for Campaign Society inScience fortheFreedom Information Research Department Operation Hurricane Atomic Association Scientists‘ World War Two War (1939World Central IntelligenceCentral Agency Churchill College Archives UniversityLondon College ix
Gaumont British News Member of Parliament
British Secret Service Crown Film Unit RoyalForce Air Prime Prime Minister Science fiction Foreign Office Picture Post
Day ar
( 15 Disarmament (UK, 1952) (UK,
August 1945)
-
1945)
CEU eTD Collection
Figure 18 Figure 17 Figure 16 Figure 15 Figure 14 Figure 13 Figure 12 Figure 11 Figure 10 Figure 4 Figure 3 Figure 2 Figure 1 Figure 9 Figure 8 Figure 7 Figure 6 Fi gure 5
TheWestern culture monster demolishes in Cows andCows thepleasurable vicinity Quatermass Marshinvasion their and project discover lunar inthe built . Dr.and Quatermasssenior Bernard scientist lamenting onthefuture of John CockcroftJohn andinternational at scientists Harwell, Picture Post
Cover of book Anthony James‘ Professor Ko Cockcroft ―nerve atHarwell‘s in center‖ Radar technology discover Establishment inQuatermass‘ ―Cockcroft the Atom,‖ of Woolf MancovitchWoolf interviews Cockcroft.ZETA inthebackground. John and Christopher Cockcroft,John Harwell's youngHarwell's workforce, Harwell‘s lively cafeteria, John Cockcroft,John Caricaturefrom John Cockcroft John in post article on British atom vil atom articleBritish on epler: ―You are ―Youepler: Lisa.‖ likeownchild my in - war science in List of Figures of List Our AtomSecrets Energy Research Research of Jacob Bronowski x British countryside The Ti Picture Post
The DailyMirror (UK, 1959) (UK, 1953) Everybody Quatermass IIQuatermass mes India of The Happy Passion: A PersonalThe HappyView Passion: Secrets Harwell of
in
Secrets of Harwe Secrets of (UK, 1948) (UK,
British Progress inAtomicEnergy Progress British PP (UK, 1948) (UK, , 7December,9. 1946, (UK, 1955) (UK, lage , 20 October, 1956, 20October,
, 7 December, 1946 , 7 British Progress inAtomic Progress British , 8December, 1945,12 Behemoth, theSea MonsterBehemoth, , 27May, 1932.
, 29December, 1948,5.
(UK, 1957) (UK,
ll (UK, 1950) (UK, (UK, 1950) (UK,
The WorldThe Sees Spaceways
s intrusion .
, 10.
- 13.
CEU eTD Collection 3 2 1 describes science. to perplexities think ― years inflicted
M Anon., Anon., John Cockcroft, ―The JohnCockcroft,
terms, ost
of after After
people,
“ “
Where Where
science, Tom
on
according a
V
similar
the the with -
J
Harrison, ‖ is is
Day, bombing
two the science science
think nuclear
view
report to
Japanese Scientist and the Public,‖ the Public,‖ and Scientist science
the of taking taking
director
a
of
science
the
report, argues month
Hiroshima
us? us? and
atom cities.
” ”
of Mass
Mass
scientists based was and prior
bomb. the
According
Observation scientists. Observation in I
Mass and to
NTRODUCTION on
truthful
‖ the Harlequin
3
interviews were Nagasaki,
The
Observation offici
community inwhichwe live. researches goweaknesses esoteric who coldlyabout our anywithout n as araceapart feeling the thatthe rest populationregards us of As scientists we often an have uncomfortable London borough. scientists‖ Towards theslogan―Shoo of the 1945 end John Cockcroft,John Iyou, This is, entirely assure an picture. false to
1
Mass Observation May Report, 1947
The
Report described press Report and
the , Christmas, 1959, 25. 1959, Christmas, , al
only timely
report:
Mass Britons conducted
reports 2489, 2489,
Project
way
was being chalked onwallswas inone being chalked without anywithout the contact with as
Observation May,
May, information ―
ormal human desiresormal human or
of This
did were
— in
vital directorof A.E.R.E. Harwell
1947, 1947, 1
in
which and long not
turning
distressed Britain,
importance
seem
a 7. - 10.
haired genthaired
scientist
the
on report,
against
to
the public when
ease by
workings
written himself,
the to
―
lemen
a might the asked
British man damage
public
two
come who of to t all
life.
‘ 2
s
CEU eTD Collection 6 5 4 in Prior about work Sc urged ―nuclear would concerns t mending its scientists States and could he
“ Tom necessary for engaged 1945, CAB CCA, CKFT 18/27, ―Atomic Energy: A Symposium by Experts,‖ Experts,‖ by ASymposium Energy: ―Atomic 18/27, CCA,CKFT stitutional We
ientists, usage
Briti
understanding. scientists
believe
to
to Harrison, The
the formerly
the
126/208, and address 4.
governmental sh destructive
issue‖
secretly for the in
urged prospect
British
to Manhattan
finalizi the government
that the
the setting, civilian to shattered
“
“
Listener Scientists
the meet
Memorandum
do security there
immediate with to upon
public ng
no problem have of ‖
and
purposes. 4
i
collaborating eminent s work purposes
their
nuclear In Project wrong
only ―
image of
work articles —
successfully marriage their to the
the
connected
Magicians work
one understand post
from
once together immediate world
is
petition and of
British energy
acceptable British solely
- a argued,
war on British their
‖ direct
again
and
other
with with
with
the or and
envi
)
suppressed
not scientists and
profession Monsters? scientists on
made
Scientists
the
Manhattan to atomic in aftermath result were and science, their wartime
merely
ronment. the
discuss post
1947 scientists‘
effective
public
internat
international not
bombs. of -
”
war on
at collaborating
through and
2 World
sci
scientists the the scientific from blindly
the account of
entific
Project) . Nevertheless way science. 5
the
That public's scientists‘ Los ional WWII,
British
worries Review
the
of
British Alamos
a
questions of way obeying
establishing
The Listener The
magazine
control onset
were colleagues,
projects its wrote
,
British
wartime
immaturity is 10
on undoubted regarding
the
will Laboratory,
public
April,
, expected of … the
British
politics, to establishment of
We the
altere
. to scientists
confidence publication. the
, 13 March, 1947. March, 13 ,
nuclear The 1947, scientist
we go urge
devoid ―nuclear benefit
nuclear
British in post
d
re Listener public to New
5. thus
this scientific scientific
equally
work
energy -
to
s
war (still of that of Mexico, because
lending were
science. government.
age.‖ weapons.
complete 6 with any
scientists
in scientists ran The
in
concerned
(
a interested research.
strict knowledge ”
restricting we
their the However,
a ”
October,
magazine
See their
special believe freedom
United
are
TNA,
The not
it in
CEU eTD Collection 10 9 8 7 bomb, on military would is conception community more bombing to anxieties inflict population. that community, example, undertone, freedom control
Weisskopf, Victor Charles
Mass.: Intellectual University
Michael part
Gordin, the
he
civilian British
were
principle of serve it
Weisskopf,
did and Harvard
Weiner,
equipment,
and will
raids the (of Gordin. nuclear
the
Press, not although
The 9
of Migration: secrecy. did being
an
the The
both post prosperity.
nuclear make
causalities
nuclear
U.S.
Joy on feel University
“ international
not
A of ― Five 2007),
The questions -
deterrence
German the New war magnified of
a
troubled, the think military
7
nuclear Insight, this
Days ― Joy
policy Europe Post
public b
weapons 12. thinking Site oogie enemy
of
Press, However,
was than
that in
-
Insight: for
war
cities
Victor 148 of
-
August:
and officials
weapons,
making
strategy.
and
crowd nor by
man: the
yet
a
the 1969),
moral
reconsider -
scientists 9.
about single (e.g. Ame
post
Seminar:
in
scientists) did to Passions atomic
Weisskopf ‖
How the
1944,
rica, be of 192
if
-
was implications their he and
war ‖
nuclear
bomb the
in extremely exposed
Manhattan Deterrence -
World
3. think 1930
The
would
order
bomb tied
scientists
of political striking no enemy supposed
a were
- r Refugees
would
1960
War
Physicist i about the remembers weapons nto
to
dropped retrospectively 3 recall
, Two intensified crea is Tokyo
prevent
and
first.
notion ed. Project complexities.
argues
did
end aware the capacity
and
Donald (New Became
tive
big the
not
and However, impact
the
American on raid
- that
the
attacks interwar for people.
had scale that
York
make
War Hir Western
Fleming
in
a
to in period a
possession Nuclear for
a
oshima. the
of need in : damage end March
.
Basic certain
Michael
a Physics Gor
‖ on many some historians the
8 post clear period
and
Weisskopf
a as the to policy
din
War bomb Books, conflict
10 1945, Bernard - consisting
possess
autobiographies. war country the in science home distinction
argues
of The
Gordin
as (Princeton: the -
making same a on
1991), setting. John
that
which Thirties,
nuclear wartime
instantaneously) Bailyn
country.
the also the
that was possess
of
argues
nostalgic Bayl of 139.
Japanese
latest
betw blissful
Princeton strategies. mentioned
inflicted
According ” (Cambridge, our ― now
weapon in
an
is scientific
It The
the
een current that and unusual
For works able
the
the
to
CEU eTD Collection 14 13 12 11 policy article, the scienti decision Defence people 1947, project Attlee fission é Committee establishing S conviction the Belief Kristan migr t
(Oxford: Security 1939 oddart Scott Christoph Baylis John
British downsid
é s, Baylis -
- but
fic 1959 Baylis sought 14 s D making. like in
was
S and Culture,
. Rudolf
were making
remind 20
to
t
Oxford Sagan, community. 1938), due oddart,
Laucht,
nuclear
that
(London:
Stoddart, Henry (1996): was understand
shrouded es
and the and
to
to briefed of
Britain
“ The
Kristan P University
Maud based
Why
include us concealment
who and within
S
e governmental in Elemental
54
t Tizard, i
projects
oddart e Palgrave that The recently British r
do - ls
Identity
in were
only
86. How
on Committee Stoddart,
should British why
and States
Britain the utter the
Press,
the argue a
Germans:
in
excluded
Macmillan,
lies Government, Otto Government was wartime Soviets Britain
published
build
research
Nuclear problematiz secrecy. May
and
continue The 2015),
was in
meddling
one for Frisch
Nuclear
first distrust in British 1947.
Klaus
sought a
the
in
to Experience, 11. scientist,
from 1940,
2012),
―
conducted
The
multica th post
conduct book
its (Lise first
Nuclear e was
Weapons?: Fuchs, Secrecy
e as
in
within it post
wartime official - to ―deterrence two 42.
war well
state due scientific
The
interested Meitner
extend
us and
-
Rudolf 11.
4 war years
research Experience:
British al
to
as at British the to was
‖ an
― Three
their
effort
the green project, causing approach, initiate
the Labour Peierls ‘ employee before
s gripping research? .
Uni ‖
in Prime nephew,
Models
German
in wartime Nuclear
The
to
light the The
versity
such
and a
but anxieties develop
the g
nuclear initial
project overnment, Role Minister
influenced ‖
in
the both
of soon
Manhattan for an
the
Search origin. Experience: nuclear
Making of of the
environment?
the reason
the co
Beliefs, the
changed Birmingham warfare for
within British
-
of Clement
project discoverer
13 confusing A
various of
project
a by even Until -
Bomb, bomb. behind
Culture, British Project.
the Scott
Ministry project The his
came
important
late
British
Attlee ”
into
reasons
11 Nuclear mind International
What
by Role Sagan's works the of and
12
Baylis 1945,
in by nuclear The post German
start Identity ‘
of
s and January of
were
Culture
— and
-
war
and
of the
-
CEU eTD Collection 15 have the lamenting ― project. Cockc present involving post multiple British reasons (and be on. the keeping lay
Moving See American 19. war physically the war post post remember Pfannhauser, ―British
rightly
U.S., end British ‖ -
―New
Cultural war ― - - Jann departed period Britain: public I war war overseas roft
ar public
a
of why
C
up Pictures/Stopping
nationalism‖ concerns
gue protecting Britain study
identity‖ British Matlock,
ross
Dominions‖ manifold constructed
representations
WWII the were that
harmed
nationalism when with
historian
The but
British and that
-
― was identity from media ‖
crisis
of environment.
)
constructed
Institutional n also Marcus
the
as
ew public. could in ―Vacancies: as
British
how and anxious
an
international in preoccupations Jann British is August immigrants
demands (by
‖
(e.g. for and representations
the
a that and be
exemplary seeks
the A. was problematic
of
Places: 15
Matlock origin
the nationalism
molded 1958 the nuclear
hotel
Doel
The
represented had nuclear
Origins to The
citizens
tied 1945
Hotels, Caribbean‘s). to young, to
Notting know of
(or
(Lanham: desks,
provide Hote swept or s British answer
and argues,
ame into
a
participants
―aliens‖) scien
until
é scientific of term.
modern
Reception
migr research ls are
represented.
with and post more a
that
Hill
multi and
the
of nuclear the
Multicultural
not
in
ce
to What 1961, the a Lexington
é
anxiety Harwell
Unfortunately, acting -
riots. an Motels
nuclear
)
positive nuclear war
settled scientific (part fixed both
about
caus scientists
post question:
important
project Desks, establishment it program
See when generation living
meant
terms.
the al over
of on as - on
5 war
nuclear
Books,
project and Ran
energy.
approach
Nation
Film representation British
a the and ―
identity community.
to despite British inner guarantee
provided study These
and were state, dal
How they British Cockcroft , be Identity
ed. 2009),
Hansen,
―British‖
research. (
and working
‖ of of
Oxford:
culture) were The
terms David
eager
was proving was
participants
at
society, can post scientists‘
Isles. British a
as in
73 Harwell
niche apparent racially temporal for
-
Citizenship were nuclear American -
be B.
any war
141.
to were
The Oxford Most was of
in the is
Clarke,
This
used through participate
British
sci identity
the in particularl
self For a contested Britain.
period
segregated
of
Commonwealth
not in complex and entists and my
University
a
science thesis British
- my these end in Cinema, the
nd conception,
Valerie
and
only which
opinion,
through its understanding independence public
thesis, post
the under refers
y immigrants
In
Immigration during
who
first ad
flexible
and
and
- important
post
wider represented set war this aspects Crawford 1929
dresses
Press, it
on
concerns?
sometimes director were
why study is to
of the environment. - seemed - thesis,
- war
s important
1964,‖
it
in Cockcroft‘s creen
phenomena domestic , early 2000), of
came needed and the
the
in these nuclear ―British
is
from for the
Post
early
John post
I in from
so to
in
from 17
the to
-
- -
to
CEU eTD Collection 17 16 Harwell, American culture. The these sufficient is representations published line College Office governmental nuclearity departure
Public from U.S. age science. ignored. However, large) Fire The British also
British of
of
with
(UK, The The decision 1950s
country
reflected and representation.
as television
Knowledge:
Jeff Archives early
―We Historian Windscale irrelevant
from for
during s p films or seemed 1961). three
the econdary television rimary Journal
Hughes
post Sov to know to cultural
documents
Atomic
are country. Harwell
end
of
in in 1 The -
iet war
Andreas the
950s
for (CCA),
the
imp Some far scientific
to recent documents the
was
respective for film
and
wonders international period sources period.
1950s.‖ too be ortant
history. research
Other See Energy British
Historical
the far
and represents less
little Aldermaston W.
historiography
gleaned University
Andreas
more is
guides
History
Daum
I culture,
to important of printed about However,
are
would in
why
used science I
Department) nuclear
the
a
developed 1961
political pay Reflections,‖
onto influenced concern British
argues
W. the
from
British scholarship
add of in
attention visual is, documents
Daum, transformation what of because
Science this
to
fiction
to
in culture
very and
nuclear for The Cambridge.
than that match Daum‘s
part,
than the
public‘s
thesis a scientific ―Varieties repre
Isis
departure and by
National
important the
the public
taps influenced
(SF) to
:
science
published
it
on
― 100
recent
6 production Peter
British). argument used
sentation Where British John was
are
of into
British
and films. altered (2009): progress.
of popular
from Thes mani
and
a are Hales‘s
Archives
Cockcroft
work
the Popular
concerns in by decade
Therefore, are
newsreel
scientists
that
a
newspapers, Victorian of
producers e a the nuclear fold. 327
is
nuclear
special
are thesis science I
popular the
on television just am British
.
Science
superb
before.
to First,
British sociogeographical at
aware ‘
of
as (and the s
provide and producti about
culture
Kew
between
of
issue papers science concerns.
SF the
important ―the
representations and
I was with study television that
film
17
books employ
verbal nuclear
(TNA;
(popular) age the on
not films
during
them is 1890 from The the ons
Transformations of British of
lagging equally 16
and
-
Day
basis not television‖
do as
the
era British
and and In British
the
culture. the Churchill
not
verbal,
pamphlets studies
early
Earth being
spac
deemed the
studies 1950s Foreign juxtapose
developed nuclear
of
reflect
behind politics
adven
― es
Caug 1960s,
official In varied
of
has and
relevant. of
history. of popular 2012, t of
at of been
ht
the
(e.g.
this
the
‖
CEU eTD Collection 19 Science of History 18 support exemplary subsequent eminent with strategies how close scholarly Polanyi Britain argued from my Polanyi scientists Walter methodology production Manhattan
I discuss mymethodology, discuss I Understanding nuclear culture? British ―Whatis JeffHughes,
secondary
historical ―
the analysis The In imaginary
and Benjamin
— ‘
for and s
Chapter British 1970s ‘
focus
by and first
role Hungarian
Br Project?‖ of discussed. Cockcroft‘ two
Jacob
studying
itish of
popular
Bronowski of
sources texts two in
(Margaret on 45 (2012): (2012): 501. 45
chapters. 1950s ‖ fusing
the I,
British and
representations
nuclear Bronowski
post I chapters
have 18 look thesis‘
Michael news
knowledge British s I science are
This -
verbal
focus war media
nuclear inspired by Schwartz and Benjamin, in Chapter II. Chapter in Benjamin, and by Schwartz inspired ‘ been In at
s of Gowing) scientist
d
photography. methodology thesis how culture Chapter serve
ivergent recent
newsreels on
and in fiction Polanyi construction produced
relation Central the culture
of
on to answers visual
through date, as and
nuclear British conceptualize III, the
political (SF)
part and
.
early
was I example in However, 19 texts European
I to
in
study
also
cinema. some of
Polish
Christoph post
various in the
p juxtaposing science
also ost 1990s
the
the is affi
study 7 debat -
the
- war
influenced
of war
cultural important of liations. SF Jacob
and
é I these
media
construction
(Lorna migr and Cockcroft
Britain take
es
the film scienti Laucht‘s Uranium 235 Uranium
lay on
Bronowski.
texts scientists
―giants‖ é ―scholarly a
Cold
Spaceways
reincarnations By
British scientists basis
step
Arnold). by fic for and
and this
Vanes
work and War.
context my
further
juxtapose for of ,‖ ,‖
of
post visual juxtaposition, by
The British Journal for the the for TheBritishJournal Harwell. decision John
calls‖ concrete
British The working Chapter on
sa invoking (UK, -
war had and
R. Central
. reminiscence. Cockcroft choice
Furthermore,
and these Schwartz‘s
1953). science. been contrast
nuclear
to
Furthermore,
II case in
studies
study e
is
European
post xamples rests
governmental I constructed,
devoted
depart studies At
as
history Although the -
Michael
war on
last,
the the work
I I ―
study
real from find from
in to m
on y ‖ a
a
CEU eTD Collection science easing representations questions and was Cockcroft How strategies U.S. British provide scienti pleasurable British examples Quatermass public‘s Chapter
its
the
and was The
sts
Brit influence
government countryside.
s
graduates
space IV
concerns
a its
in publicity was of and
aim chosen ish wider
departs for
importance post II the
argues of public‘s used of
(UK,
young of
―
-
Harwell on claim war this lay
to over to Cockcroft
influenced from
to represent
urbanity How ‖ 1957) lead join
that
Britain. thesis
public domesticize scientists?
perplexities nuclear onto
for
positive
British the depicted the did
and
displaying
is
h ‘
and
and project
s British Harwell
the ow Although
to
by
doubts science. Behemoth,
―Big
show
Harwell, domestic British the representations post
as scientific and
and
nuclear British
to
- science‖
manage and British war the
fears I my withstand
daily stand start
production fears
to the nuclear
debate study
nuclear ―aliens‖ project over carve
post by
Sea life? to for projects.
8 involving
represent giving and
s
is
nuclear - public‘s the Monster
project war a on
―Aliens
restricted
managed, project
prominent
and
dwells
of British science
nationalism?
examples
representations
the
energy, the
to
its uncertainties
(UK, at was
on
display
life
nuclear
ra to space
Harwell‖ and by
pid place spatial
- represented Cockcroft 1959)
threatening
positive
as of scientists?
industrialization as
well What its two
experience? for
safe , representation
addresses in through of over
itself. important
as dependence and
kind nuclear and
for
. motivating
nuclear How Why nuclear
cross
the
Harwell, This
of which
At
these
publicity society did was science
- SF
of media mean
s last, science? science
from
the
and
films the
I young
it invoke
how t
and
on and
the
CEU eTD Collection 23 22 21 20 British scientists moment the Cavendish
CCA, CCA, TNA, J.D.
atom. CHAPTER
In Bernal,
culture CKFT CKFT KV
1932, of
have A
2/3524, L their
caricature The aboratory
27/1, 17/10,
at that their
Social
formidable
the
I 14/a, The .
“ the
Speech post Science in
backs height
Times
Function
“ reprinted at caricaturist British
the
at turned
of
of
discovery.
the
University Youth India
of the
I
nternational Science in
to ,
Great
had 27 The Festival - the war Britain: Michael Britain: war Jacob Polanyi and Bronowski
May,
23
to (London:
Times
readers. of
Depression
The put
Committee,
1932. Symposium Cambridge,
I associated it They challenged. examined as Now notably by them administrators, science, on signs peculiarity
of
do
would
George 9
constructive
comparing the (Fig. India
not
selves.
that
are ―
question ” Cockcroft in Surveillance
with on
30 agree
but
1)
be Routledge
not represents
science Europe,
John because
Planning with
January,
20 Moreover,
of better I in
the very
think
with science this
that
role, they Cockcroft of ―i
theatre
‖
t.‖ appears
and
to
happy two
1957. the in
representation its
and they Professor I
the
must file its get Science, Burhop can
Sons,
very
need with they scientists
―
social
two and must Walton
someone on
about best
be in
and 1946),
right
other are Jacob for
”
scientists
the a is the 20
Bernal
express not
function
de Ernest
organizers
Bernal, just so
September, ‖
films. to working P.L. scientists 1. structive
creative
on
is be Bronowski, new aloof
exist
as t
the hat
—
Kapitsa,
Walton,
my 22
at bad.
- must and
J.D. from
that less is two the the
in
1959, meaning fields,
as in 21 being
decide
the
is Bernal be well
split 1959 1957
not 2.
CEU eTD Collection marker throughout in the acclaimed discusses scientist post be work, scientists
politics, juxtaposed
state - war
The an
of
and become
scientists alchemist
for an
the epigraph
scientists
history Britain
appropriate a them
Br
to potential
itish
the crucial
of to
in surveil is is
become late
science be nuclear the trying a
sample
threat
comprehensible. for
scientist 1950s 1930s lance
public
to
part and project) ,
solve as
from epigraph files. and
of the for perceived
appointm
post 1940s
the the
the practice
blossomed.
- problems surveillance at
opening war Fig. In .
the Chapter
by
ents? contrast
British of
1 10 beginning the
science
of
Furthermore,
The of British
I a
daily 1930s file to
depicts youth
answer
the (particularly
on of
post life
pe
British
this festival. Jacob
the
tite lies and -
war it
chapter, context
aims scientists,
in how Bronowski,
society. governm
When a its
to complex
did
organization)
in
gleaned outline
which their The did
framed ent.
Polish
Britain
caricature
fusion
relationship
The the
from Harwell
in
stakes
document
é ‘
their migr British of s
most
shifts
can (as
é own
to
a
CEU eTD Collection 27 488. (1959): 26 25 24 Normative debated (particularly science two use, alternative period. second the programs Britain efforts on having demolished scientific Harwell
Vintage August, Fyfe Energy,‖ Atomic of Uses Peaceful ―The Cockcroft, John Dani Anon.,
the public
fronts rather Robert Science
el
Robe
model
in
helped reason and The
seemed
J.
in “ had 1945, Books,
Scientists
the project,
dominated Kevles.
interest
— rtson, the than energy Structure
America bitterly continental
to the
K. Manhattan
of as
13.
and years for to
1979),
battle
destructive
determinable “ the Merton
marriage the What The
end
whose
satisfying relating scientific following sources.
cold U.S.
―
before Physicists:
― of 321 much
creator WWII. with Calder the
research Science
Europe.
- wrote
project. winter 322.
Life
secrets
between science 26 in
of
and potential.
Hall
progress anxieties
the and
Nuclear Picture
order
magazine, to
early The
about gave
,
during
of means
post In to post
The bearer of
History
to
1946/1947
the scientists, address for
Britain wartime atomic
- -
these 27 British Post
war
were article war energy widely to
post it WWII. Science
You,
of published of to
, and redevelop rendering
problems
a
life, an - important the be energy.
Hiroshima
” introduced Scientific
progress research,
was
America felt
Picture industry
illustrated made
deemed
‖ 11 problem
was,
and
by
in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine Medicine of Society Royal the of Proceedings
‖ an
ment.
24
it
Post this of
British
in Community
that from the
for
25 was
article apparent
Although
and
as Hiroshima environment,
his
the
, it of secrets
respect Briti
post 25 of
an
However, was
the this the scientists
formidable
most February,
nuclear the
exemplary, on - sh
war coal
of
state) nuclear early
in
that
―
25 magazine
molded
the
atomic destroyer. important Modern
and Britain,
crisis August
Britain
scientists ‘ British 1957, period,
the was
science ―
Nagasaki 1942 state energy energy,
organization America to first
of
less 28.
established
as
‖ magnify 1945
contributors
had the
and of
already
es
- The
was ”
well class
evident
and
that say, Picture acute
early
to (New
American
attacks. praising
progress
represented
the
as rely had British The
its fighting
self
post
York: the Post
of
and public.
in
seized on civilian
- science giving 1938 much The
, 52 -
British
highly 25 war
of radar
on
as -
CEU eTD Collection 30 29 28 mathematician European period. Hungarian since Bernal‘ a relationship committed multiple and in scientists group development decade because important, what consciousness
scientific Chicago Theoretical Studies
Bernal, Anna Robert conflict
its
institutions British
established
-
relationship K. s before My
in
K.
British
The ideologies work
Press,
Joseph Mayer, intellec
History
with
Merton, a
physical to
genius; approach
and
of Social
clear
anti
o the
‖
Merton 1973),
f is
science
Jacob Empirical
i Marxist
government science. “
nduced
-
a Setting and Nee and
tual
notion
Marxist “ to British
Functi
The useful
only
to and
chemist,
267. study
Philosophy
dham
societies in
Bronowski. ‘ ―
the
Normative s imports to
up on
describing origins
thinkers wartime the Investigations by that Historian
backdrop rendering
the
state
a intellectuals of the
and
the discipline,
workings
Science, was
history addressed state
history
are ‖ of
and changing
of Walter
Structure
exemplified
Science at interested essay,
most its
and
Anna
British
culture. Cambridge for of 411.
of ed.
II: main
of of
the
society. disputed
Pagel the
science British
Norman Bernal‘s beneficial 35 B
of -
science a K. scientific ritain
organization
(2004): Science, society post
development
participants. in
What Mayer
by headed
history addressing
-
12 W. like According and
had
war Bernal‘s
the
at work
43.
”
stirred
Storer,
could for
in field.
the
argues
technological J.D. hosted
of writings scientific
Robert the
scienc
science
during
University
of
Unlike
28 (Chicago Bernal of bring
the Cambridge
work. domestic
scienc
to that The
conferences post K.
e.
field of and Bernal
Merton: WWII environment
forth Although
this
essay - Polanyi Needham on For
war “ a e
the
nd
of progress
of must
the (scientific)
was
example, ,
scientific London: end
history
Committee, British and Cambridge. The there considers
organization
on due of not and
Sociology Merton well
and ideology
was the rest
rests
be The to of scientific Polish
Michael
progress.
Pagel,
into organization
an left
concerns. science
on no the University
‘
on 29
and s ” of interesting
,
the
such
out work the question
1931 German
Central Science of
Bernal were
context,
post Polanyi, of science were 30 - thing
1948,
is
of A sight
- -
often
war
and of
was ”
as
a
CEU eTD Collection 32 31 ―cultural shows unites British ― documents growing problematic documents Communism. ― sponsored Information magazine, and as British Cultures red Western
Brits colonies seen Freedom Information homosexuals
Hugh The well
the
menace
In as IRD
would Polanyi
how
Wilford, Cold Society as
public.
an
this
influence and debate
Cold ‖
(London:
was
newspaper
important cover which post
are from
they
find
Research
relationship ‖ Research
ex chapter War in
32
an ‘s by
-
War,‖ The also for Britain. - colonie However,
In out
war - anti in (―ant were
TNA organization)
engaging was
culture
Frank
contrast
CIA, the
as 1959. that
part - used
Communist
science Department I
was s. a
i articles
, sponsored See addressing
study Department - Freedom
even
the of Communist‖) scientist particularly The Cass
to that
Documents Cold
as
Andrew these also British
to intellectuals role George
proble
Pub preoccupied verbal solely
both
that these
War
propaganda
a
of (London invested lishers,
documents
in and
Left
domestic
by Defty, the
similar
address Orwell matize
politics
the
Science (IRD).
as documents
the papers
the and Department as
include and
2003), part British
and Britain,
an two
U.S.
the like l
helped
agency. and arge with
concerns. historiography 31
Bronowski‘s
the concern. eloquent New
of
and Cold
( will
documents 202.
The
SFS
Polanyi diplomacy
Central
the
pamphlets
and America amounts complex
tackling
the from was York: 13 the
War: also
The )
Congress
―
and IRD
U.S. cultural
― Encounter
Among Post advisory. popularizer British
Routledge,
the British be to
Intelligence
and with Jacob used
the of authorities relationship on (―Communist‖) dispel
read
- last
by war that
Anti
money
Foreign conducting
to Cold for Bronowski. Intellectuals Communist
‖ Michael
many
Bronowski half
tackle in
- When science, stresses ,
Communist
2004). Cultural the
I the
of War. bring
of
Office
and
Agency apparent
issues ―
the science. had context the
WWII of
a Polanyi
‖
list
records the energy and although
Red the
scientists
I with These established Freedom
threat ‘ Propaganda, post
s go of raised,
importance the
surveillance pamphlets Menace
(CIA)
up
― of threat However,
beyond crypto
Bronowski -
were Congress
war wr
.
into
evoke
the until This
part
itten
the
with
‖ (also
and it opened
-
writings Encounter of
tackling Communists
in in
The 1945
chapter relating
formidable
of
the
British
1948.
for on for
the
of
the the
a the
‘
- in Two
s CIA Cultural science 53:
the
British
state
1995,
It
and the
The was
- ‖
and
CEU eTD Collection 35 34 33 collaboration? science usage post organized Communist juxtapose that case), the formation German British organization one
objective nuclear resting Frederick Hamilton, Histo Laucht Laucht,
production
- is British war
34 My of the rian
nuclear
on look
his
espionage). overlooked é
― Elemental science
migr
account.
methodology
Western
conduct the Morgan, of (with of three 1952)
approach - nuclear
leaning
science like of British
writings
é
How of
British culture,
science. in physicists state
was
after See
popular
8
Germans
relation that ‖ It of
Margaret October,
culture
science is did Jacob nuclear
Laucht,
allows science scientists.
sponsorship
debated
the
important the of
like
rests the
to British the
,
knowledge
intense 6. Rudolf Bronowski
1951, TNA,
was
Gowing Elemental latter
Christoph as
one culture.
on staunch and
I
through
to
a
government will
constructed
secondary
1. FO counter to have
the influence
marriage
in
Peierls
takes criticize
overcome 371/93226,
33
mind) Germans
threat anti in during .
Altho Laucht complex Their
mind this - agent
-
and influenced
communist
her
sources
stance,
and between the that
solely ugh the ,
formidable
very
‘ 98; approach GE the Klaus s
14
for
relationship
production communicated book questions
state
Laucht See
22/54/G,
especially
problematic
similar
the
by that Alan
Alan Fuchs the
has Elemen
in ― and inadequate
British
discuss
Moorehead
Chapter is state
Cold
Moorehead, Letter of
over
views
anti which in
at
had
books. between
painting
times tal
and
‖ -
War nationalist scientific
from
fascist
to III. a Central influences.
on Germans
could
determining
‘ Moorehead the
scient ― s
Soviet events somewhat Alan book
The how the
science
wider Michael
British not Traitors
European
ists Moorehead
The work science
attitudes ‖
. (like
35 Laucht be ‘
science.
during s public Traitors
In and book nuclear
careless role reduced
in (London: Polanyi
the relation
should
the
the
influence was to
in argues that proves their Klaus
(on
What project General
post
public?
the not
regarding British to Hamish to argue
be to wartime
- an
the
war the Fuchs that
will that
as this,
on
I
CEU eTD Collection 37 36 without Britain. science à perhaps monolithic society Snow integration is Bronowski technocratic culmination recast becoming science‘s‖ temporal Snow 1.1. -
(especially vis ―… C. beyond
The Two Cultures Cultures The Two P.
the literary ‘ ‘
Science The
this s s Snow,
36
was
is 1959 main British giving both,
end
This
present the climax increasingly state
response ‘ on between divide
s
a on The
post
tradition, views
and idea Rede the popular scope
that does
schools
i
enough s the
of Two
- Arts
due
war to
the throughout between have and affairs
changing not lecture
on of to science, Cultures the
side), turn to
debates
topic science.
the a this debate inpost the and
space resonate interli
seized
an problems changing
out to
and
reason
organization delivered outdated
thesis; tries the
well and the some
culture
post
nked to I the because
public Furthermore cultures think
the public scientific
to with
before
extremely -
world, behind
of war nevertheless,
post make to Scientific
this
British and post - at ‘ the daily war Britain
s
The scientific -
(and
is the war i of Snow of
nterest
but
sense the - state the
now
war research.
able science
science.
Two University life
Revolution
,
university scientific fellow
Snow state. the debate.
a
‘
science students,
but s
well 15 of in
from
Cultures
I debate. 1959 enviro
extrapolate
late their
struggled and
sees 37 scientists) recognized The
The (New 1959
However,
environment.
1950s
debate they and of
tradition arts nment. discontent
the debate It
Cambridge is disharmony
Y is
also its to
(predominantly problem a ork:
to
either
Britain.
fault
. symptom argues this Snow relationship
turn Snow‘s
It find
has
Cambridge of the
is
of . day.
out
classics The the
also a ‘
the the problem Post
s
. as against rich
This
very arguments I between
Snow dramatic
British lectu
start
― problem of most a - most
war
University historiography,
way
high ―mainstream sentence to
and literature)
re
with
Polanyi's is
society educa effective places
sc
important specialized is
to
science ― humanities,
ience
title serious, of
a
regarding justify the
tional rhetoric
Press, post
summarizes science
lie or
chapter , was
and way
or
and system
- the
‖ in
students ‖ a war 1961),
which
in Snow
C.P
the to
vis ‘
s at
.
18.
-
CEU eTD Collection 40 39 38 sugge science waiting molded civilisation. strict the regards conflict? things represented their and Scientists reassurance dismisses regard scientists. there asserts.
the and Snow, Snow, Snow,
humanities indulge
school
real Proceedings are governmental st The
and scientists
There science and The The The that for to
literary How optimism,
‖
are the
gap serve level.
are
The
Two Two Two the
‖
by scientific that in these
Neither
equally latter.
are between accustomed
should misery.
Snow, can Communists ”
Cultures, Cul Cultures,
as two
of
the See he as intellectuals,
two
are the an
tures,
be shallow has
control) Sutherland, purpose and The groups
the Manchester important
aware not freedom Britain is treated utterly They
the seen
7. 6. 4.
that it
narrative
literary
as ‘
s to
two
have and
an of relevant. without to and try o of
different even reform as
f Gordon,
and
are
human accomplish optimism
spreading confused cultures
Literary part to too
a
participated figures, absolute
way strategy
best do on having
optimistic,
of draw its
“ Scientific something the
British tragedy,
cultures of the and exhorted
post is
individuals nor that other dignifying ing scientific
disregard
fascist an
and post Philosophical the
- and
war
― in intellectual a the
pure
16 latter. the - unawa scientists, but in close
both war progress
American
in
despite
ideas. rest education ―
strength ‖ the
unlike democracies,
progress
for
environment.
scientists
the cultures. who
attention Contrary of re
Western
Society
each
What
of
us new of
Universities will
loss
but know the
current badly
human of to
onto other.
organization
most 102 march literary for
can He
argument are hel to to
civilisations. very
Snow
the
(1959): Snow
Robert
need. p
knows ― society aware
However,
tragedy tragic
poor importantly The alleviate —
regardless
s
little
figures, tate Some ‘ ‖
s
and ― 40 3.
countries,
emanate
that K. them literary
conditions. arguments .
glean
Literary about of
and
Comparisons, ― Merton
‖
the Snow‘s the education science
38 they
inside
poverty.
of ―
from At
conflict? physical
the Western intellectuals from
the ‖
refuse cultur one
‘
instead s 39
seem function
attack
and (under this political views
Snow
Snow
” pole,
must
― Memoirs
e,
This
out. to Snow to
as on
of
sit that
‘
‖ be
of s
is
CEU eTD Collection 44 43 42 41 cultures against generously science, Harvard, disinterested declared identified outlined success replace promised society, conservative to equal is system
Isis
Michael Hollinger, Hollinger, David to triumphantly
expand 86
Similarly Historian to
or
international (1995): the A. ‖
of
led
but geopolitical
the
that
was Polanyi,
was
to
‗ ideology, Hollinger,
the
science “ “
closed; by
Science Science by
instead organization alter
their
Catholic judgments
American
aware
debated program 444. the rationalism,
in David leading
“
the The
scientific
Government. ‘ Britain,
as as and “
as
Science asserted and
of
threats success. a a current Two
Ch by the A.
Weapon, Weapon,
the
democratic was
democracy the based if
urch. Hollinger of Michael Cultures,
foundation
The ― divide
as
scientific knowledge the way apparent
to higher that
state
a
” ”
upon
Weapon ― Science Two 446. 445. West 43
freedom. in scientists
”
between
— Polanyi
Encounter
tackling in
education needed
remarks Cultures exact ‖
public in objectivity
of the
in were
in
was
Harvard ‗ Kulturkampfe
‖ the
place
other
evidence.
C.P. in ― were
citizens ,
to Marxism
used the instead
September, on
spiritual
debate the in
do
17
of Snow ethos the regions.
‘
post
fortunate
and
s cultural as
something
aristocratic General
potential with ‘‖
a of
opened
- in
humility.
‘ war of and tool 42 values
s
1959, private the
lecture Jame
science Science ‗
magazine the
America. American United for to
Education 61
‘ questions
about have of
s habit
of projecting - models
knowledge; 5.
This B.
on post
‖
States a
and
committed
Conant,
their democratic
Britain being of
Encounter ―
- ideological menace
war The
scientific
forming during
of
of in
research
authority. an
science a on employing r ‘
eport s the open
Free
ideal
and supposed
the such to
director humanism .
objective,
44 progress
after
the
use
forefront, explicitly discourse Society,
backed
and post The
as 41
freedom World of
science The the
education - debate
― war of science two
are up
which
and
War
then to
of
–
II
” it ,
CEU eTD Collection 46 45 However, century of published smartl IRD warfare. Francis scholarship one enthusiastically over communist, The post as
Acknowledgments. New
Michael Francis Polanyi well
- anticipated
t and war communism arget
Polanyi Press, y
as Stonor to disguised
Stonor According
the British Polanyi,
‘ the book Polanyi the group
s
2000),
was
but work CIA.
‘
magazine mid s
Saunders,
S
by
discussion Personal greeted needed
created
aunders, society. Personal
of
165 45
was as -
and adds those century
the to The
- addressing 189.
reached Saunders, li
The magazine
an to
in fe
– because
magazine celebrating
Knowledge:
Encounter
Knowledge published
serves
be
is the
important of ideological Cultural
paradigmatic
kept the
early in
international
of as Encounter
debate 1989
was
non was Cold
these Towards an
1990s in magazine the
, twist.
- sponsored
left . 1999, interesting
communist. usage
a War:
The
fall
in
political archival - .
leaning
of
Encounter T a
was of The opening
he
influenced Po of the cultural
was 18 ―
st
archives CIA
― oppressive
created - by the changes
Critical
backdrop tool
openings.
intellectuals
established
However,
and the
scientific, of
debates.
has par
the the Congress
scholarship
Philosophy and
often
in
to World excellence ‖
archives
for
An science, regimes. sponsored be
t
he told ‖ , in
discussing
analyzed who important of as
1953 triumphalism for
(London:
Arts
a discussed
on
around
different were
from
Cultural but Cultural
and
and cultural by
from its
Letters
not the book
the a Routledge, published
the joint content
by
perspective Freedom role
early strongly Cold his
of Cold world
by (New Hollinger. -
work
― recently
of journalist
free
twentieth War 2005), was
War science
in York: was
. anti
of 46 society Britain.
Much
of the
- The
the
in
‖
CEU eTD Collection 48 47 of state. its for Polanyi technological to I knowledge lines, linked development 1.2.
see
the George
Polanyi,
lie. SFS
modest this
Michaelpost and Polanyi the
Society,
the
‖
State, way particularly severe, an between has but The On Polanyi but
) 47 to
is
remarked did other
Thomson,
trouble;
Polanyi
the the “ I
should been
that
The most
it beginnings
th
” but not and
used Society
ink state occasion
should of
possible Two expansion, agrees
the
the for
to
spectacular seem science.
in
we remain
where
made
“
to achieve but
Society Speeches on and Cultures, west some
consequence for
be can,
not
on
past to
not
Freedom in geopolitical of
danger,
it
done.
and
a
play the
be independent. years.
Unlike 1941,
without
SFS
apparent but
only deep
” for and harmony made
61.
ignored. danger the ―
gap; i in ‘ Freedom Almost
nto
s current
in -
in which
Paradoxically, had seated at communist
tenth collaboration
Snow, the Science,
physics, ‖ the unreasonable - the
war of organization
in
success.
however, to
already and
State Dinner The
the anti year
the
though the enemies ― disturbanc
in Our Polanyi
truth March
Encounter increasing
-
only freedom has
Science Marxist has
anniversary
held
powers delineated task Science
there
far over
acquired
between 1951, made
the way
of 19
to optimism, does
is
less e
celebrate
science:
reason
(
scenario of between the
is
not SFS of 3. have
expense article it
should
not
something spectacular science
getting
whole much
a to science scientific in great ),
new
agree become
with for suppress the 1951,
say
that of science not
Tenth harder
power this of
range enemy comes,
enough
that
Snow which that
the strictl
many George
far
and is and worse…
Anniversary
this
the
answer science of largely to and more in
‘
to
s art of Polanyi
y
for
money
forms knowledge. finance science. specialisation predictions.
danger scientific
develop
course, Thomson all circles.
the troubling
There
does that other should
of
moment of is was
science 48 is
the science,
the to
from on
Furthermore not
less culture is, freed
(the affiliated
appeal Foundation
This
be
technocratic The relations
in
however, lie
of
now Marxism,
less
closely
the om in president
in is reason
appears
the
to
where — than
from
the
of
,
the
it
CEU eTD Collection 51 50 49 moves Forms earlier according when community the Mary (with scientific organized already and Merton and general
the Planning Planning Merton, Polanyi Mary
Kaiser thriving constraint
Physical
In their Rather The the Jo
offer of on Jo
li mentioned stressed
Polanyi Nye The
had
nes Nye,
of of Organization, Nazi
progress.
- to shift to scientific Wilhelm personalities
Science, Science, established
for
and attacke
Normative only clearly anti than of
sees
“
on Historical
regime
towards
SFS a Biological ‘ as - s
Jewish chair by scientific
scientists Polanyi d
1953 49 ” ” formidable important
. Marxist Society Polanyi life divide
Institute
a Similarly, The
Structure
came fruitful
in ‖ sources
in the working pamphlet and
51
laws.
Sciences
state p ‘
Weimar
for he s
view takes th hysical
publications, problems working
to dedication expertise)
e
in components Freedom
attacks
of of
co
1942 difference The was power
of Polanyi Berlin. a
Science
science -
37 towards strong
operation science entitled
chemistry Germany
expulsion seen (2007):
essay
under
the of in and
50 - ,
contribute stance
as
to
268. Science
views
scientific
from as
Nye ―
thus -
between
the
social Neo the threatened of 423. ― talks
the restricting Pure
inside
against a the the
at ― of argues
social limiting
nd
, - the ethos -
20 direction
Marxian
Occassion practice:
in the
earliest Polanyi
― and that
ethos to
organization importance an great science
J.D. University
structure
of ―
Applied
that to institution.
he big
scientific
the
days
Michael science Bernal
of
reorganize al
length
theory of was
soon Polanyi science
Pamphlet ― science.
and
the of communism
’
reluctant
s the
Science of
of
followed
Polanyi ‖ work.
of state, technology about
in of
freedom
as science SFS Robert having ‖
Manchester. enjoyed
Polanyi science
No. ‖
projects. the the
See .
science
’ In the s
4,
and
to
building Berlin, scientific
the Michael
‖ and
February,
K. different
in importan
by leave and ‖ ‘
the 1945 their s
(the
his
from Merton
Historian work he
imposing ” would
collegial Historical
scientific
1920s Polanyi,
accepted pamphlet his - ― Appropriate block
pure community 1946: the
scientists followed ce
post
in remain
1930s,
of ‖
work
of
the 1 secrecy of
“
and Studies
The respect -
“ even 14.
The
an science
at free
the but
in
CEU eTD Collection 53 52 operate establisher originality, personal why could Science contrast, and given delineation. Technology will or theory, ― applied
in Polanyi,
Michael technic
Science ingenuity).
develop is
Polanyi are system. of could In by nev
science
Polanyi
in
must ‖
view this
contact science “ the regarded ) Polanyi, e al)
Pure ,
a
r but
of Occassional
the
be
creative be Work
can system; superior) the must
be scientific Tasks of believes
and
also organized
not
latter assigned However, aims
be distinction the original rather “ functions
Pure Applied
is be
as self to centrally
systematic
of
and divided
will each to
mere directed Pamphlet
and show
- and
that
this than sustainable? deal institutions
externally
independent Science and as Applied justly
the
scientists
independent differently. routine
science
kind
between how the written
with
planned by
the
higher
No. centrally
nature fail subordinates
and subordinate
do Science they
creation
the 14,
.
investigations,
is
t (like in
to If precept being heir - Polanyi
science
December ranking
supposed
and creative,
intermingle. atmosphere. sci
fact obtain of
tasks as and Appropriate
Harwell), ence
science
has of
assigned part arise
their .
tasks ideas argues However,
and
of an individual (that
a 1953: is
run 21
of
conviction
clear
A
an in independent a
knowledge ppropriate it
the
52
having (done creative
occurs the arise Forms
The by
should authority
might 1 the
that In -
pyramidal 13.
process
the course
a if state task
in supervises this
of by
short
a in little same be
acknowledge Forms
the that Organization, product
scientist
experts
of
the
is should centrally on thought
academic of of
worker
summary filling because
scie ―
ingenuity
individual structure this all of a economic
process
Organization,
ntific
as
research all
working
not fails last
possible
in literature
by directing ” work
post. science 9.
overrid
one
that
Marxist of
value. to
his of
found
‘ of
planning.
s the
prove
auth
in (whether
particular mind. on science The own surveying,
” that
53 technology.
Neo e
Society is
and the a in
ority
its conviction.
state, single spread inclination
his/her
scientists the
An
-
completi fine Marxian
‖ must
and
scientific for Polanyi
arts.
gap idea as
but task
arts,
Freedom by
the task
in In
they
on
the
CEU eTD Collection 55 54 by independent Snow Snow‘s the Britain? public to understanding expansion great to pa public responsibility
technical like and “ made
Although Theodore radoxical.
The understand appear
comparing subject
Observation, the divide
The
Fading
justified sure and be
view Parisian The
and overcome from
problem
the
M. to to the in
and Star
of Historian organize
Communist “ all
of Porter, divide
the boring and to science
of growing
the
the gove
obs
”
the of walks the support
Osiris basic 1950s.
support. ervatory the
post
mid
of and ”
“ ―gap‖
to rnmental exclusion How and (particularly
Paris
scientific
to
of 18 benefit - specialization of -
concepts
nineteenth inability war project
It -
the
Science the (2003):
science society leaning
depended
Observatory between 55 is
technocratic
thriving
arts, How impo
meddling.
and itself of
with
specialization
Became
95. of
to
(most the Theodor thus mathematician
could
rtant on
contribute
century of as
understand science. science the
public of science public in part
alleviating
division
Technical, the to predominant science.
the Bronowski‘s
science, of
remember
Nineteenth Porter
to
participation
and the
began from Science ―
ga take to
of
and Parisian 22 modern
humanities p
” the labor
But
‖ Jacob
Isis in
the argues the
Bronowski
over wider between
mid
problematic
Century:
became
100 what during that ― — ―gap‖
late and anti workings
- science.
Bronowski through nineteenth the
(2009): that
public
nineteenth the donations.
- Polanyi
technocratic technicians
are
the between Astronomers
WWII),
too
with ―gap‖ argued
not 293.
specialized
(and the
o
policy technical century, f
specialization,
does century
Astronomy the science.
had twentieth between
the the that transcultural) and
same
- ’
written
making argument
not
Urban
many public two intellectual
science culture.
for
‖
science
mention
54
problem. the
was cultures.
scientific century, Culture
the In
extensively had in
See public,
becoming
a
slowly must general
was
nuclear
workers),
scientific interaction and
lost David
of is
institutions,
While
justified came Circulation remain
the
the
and starting
more Aubin, public
yet on
the
it is
CEU eTD Collection 59 58 57 56 resulting authorities both provide recent be particularl political also intellectually Communist, give a College was 1.3.
chair from Journal (London: Ralph Anon. His TNA,
part
BronowskiJacob obligations andthe ofa scientist
soon reflect much sides
appoint
Bronowski Jacob
H.W.H.
atomic
at , of KV
Desmarais,
an
at The
for ideals.
in
the integrated His
the y
of the
2/3523 description were opportunity
on the ment M.I.5. Effects on Br
he
Sams the Majesty University
more
British bombings.
University
onowski the History perfecting
Nevertheless, was
and particularly
Atlantic. and was “
‘ Jacob of to troublesome
s c
suitability ’ the
never into ompetent record H.G. s
KV
Mission
of Stationery under
of
Atomic Bronowski: to Science was
2/3524.
58 of
the
Kelsey,
Bronowski of 59
the become
present
The Hul
of
surveillance, born Cambridge
British interested for
British
Bombs to Bronowski
telephone than
45
Office, l
effect experience
wartime
28 where Hiroshima
(2012):
in a
at an January,
Humanist the
at educational Poland
‘ local
bombing s 1946), outspoken
that Hiroshima
personality rest he in work
588.
to conversations
as was
the
1943. Bronowski remained
Communist
study
would
of
iv.
and
and Intellectual were was
apparent
Hull appointed campaigns.
23
and
im Nagasaki
system, public extensively mathematics. his
influence
‘ mig and
s Nagasaki:
throughout
family, communist
for might
rated
Communist meetings career over figure
gaining
to an
in 57
discussed.
Atomic work
his
to baby by have After Report 1946
at and
Upon Britain
views the
1930s.
Hull. because
a community.
on
on food
Age, popularizer to the fellowship
of membership British
See
wartime
the determine the completion,
56
of War,
at
1946
and Surveillance TNA,
Although
British
students science, the he
government. -
household
1956, Bronowski
deemed
age
KV
projects, The
from
Mission of
the
of ” 2/3523,
of
science
as
with The he he 1930s
his Jesus effects twelve.
well
documents himself was
was
British to
mother, his
28a,
would Japan The
files
as on offered a
of
Letter He
the
CEU eTD Collection 63 62 61 60 by scientists. only modest of never political 1955. conduct the topics and passport governme Bronowski articles director trivialities.
from case press M.J. interven
Jacob Bronowski, Jacob In The TNA,
power.
r
state eading he
December aspect
and These
incident Findlater,
dreamed In John and Bronowski
was
KV
on game
of and ed and and
it, three did 63
nt‘s caused -
He
60 Boyd the and 2/3524, the the
to Bronowski not
Bronowski worrying
concerns not
make
financial Nevertheless, the reached
1955,
over
might
be
1951 days 12 the relevance
National
1947
of
allowed
want Carpenter
a
public. eloquent December,
The Dilemma of the Scientist the of Dilemma The radio scandal. 126a, being addressed
Bronowski available it.
before
embarrassment both to have Mass
Scientists Bronowski
were
status. attract show
PF. touches
is
Boar to
granted What the
(MP) of
The
remarked blunt
49,676, about Observation
speak 1955. a
Bronowski was addressed newspapers post
attention
his was visit during
chapter d
Before to
were
for
cancelled.
upon
about
-
l H.S.
research due
the ike war his
on 6 are to
Coal, March, ‘
s to in this the the regarding the Morrison opportunity British ―
their
scientific science. epigraph moral the
radical
and the give in ‘ having
s
Report
responsibilities 1950s
Soviet
See based
held
the career
transition
for 195 the new new
a (London: National Peace Council, 1955), 4. 1955), Council, Peace (London: National
BBC ramifications. nuclear TNA,
‖ pamphlet
House 7. (FO), both the
displays
numerous
It
sacked
ideas.
was
status, post on engag (which
Union. 24
flourished
matter. is
talk to
KV
14 his policy
not
of
- the of
discuss war research.
on
September, how Some Commons. 2/3524,
ement
personal high UCL
a 61
clear
See The position I atomic
of scientist
position
radiobroadcasts mention - Bronowski the makers
TNA,
-
The a ‘ in
salaries of Dilemma
and s
why government in 114a, scientist?
energy,
physics the 62 it
WWII, 1951, The experience,
public,
FO of advise However, might
ed and the and 1950s. Letter and
the issue
371/93226,
and
‘ in 1.
however
s British
of the does the professor
speeches
post
the scientists How be was from Bronowski
with
of political the
He
and
newly
public?
due Burhop
introduction). still -
the not
or war
N.E.
Scientist
the was the was
government
GE wrote
to more sensitive most
try
government
Eric
scientist acclaimed Wadsley
highest were
22/49/G, could previous slipped importance. a an
to scientist argues,
newspaper appointed concretely, imp
Burhop's play published
monitored
to have
through (BBC)
echelons ortant
Burhop Letter
The vis
allowed
the
hates
to - à
The
-
to the
vis ‘
s in
CEU eTD Collection 66 65 64 creative spirit: important science importance Although the misunderstanding similar. conceived creative Science should of but public mediator of needs danger
Bronowski, Bronowski, Jacob modern post
ultimate by
Did In
to
the
prestige, - a
be
lies Bronowski,
war
and
Obviously, and
and e series new be
between
ndeavor
both
irresistible Harwell pro
than in
science
in
of done,
science.
the Science Science truth, Human
can
the way phesied
the
scientific
of Polanyi
their
public but
only
analysis
lectures Science
public
according of comparable
and the but
and live
and and for perpetuating
discoveri Value, Through
technocratic
need
to flourish
state ―
distrust
will Human Human the up and a Bronowski,
‘
organization the
and s
human
of
delivered
hatred to to
public.
be and
Bronowski he
― Hu nature.
to
the
laymen, explore.
Value Value es.
an
achieved. in
to of addressed man
Bronowski, the
progress,
expectations open a What it. the and science.
reasoning.
What
, ,
creative Value
public.
80. 70. The there Therefore, at
arts.
‖ ‖ as the
MIT dialogue,
66
as science regard
post
a (Harmlondsworth, deems Bronowski
the growing are
Bronowski It Science way
and
Moreover,
atmosphere,
is in is
-
The peculiarities no
war
an
set
also 1953, science
not through
25 has the scientific t
the open
two
up scientist
scientist‘s
governmental is a process very to
scientist stressed: set by which
not
cultures;
refers
teach
the dialogue to
which
of Polanyi
personal how Middlesex:
an
be
knowledge
scientist
of is findings
of
Bronowski
us assembly
to
a role
a scientific
is did
―…
creative scientific
the the bridge here there
elevated
with and
grip is the the
and
highest
general Penguin
is
not but is
is Bronowski
the British
society
not
such
between human, over of
not
endeavor
knowledge. a
compiled motivated the and
to publ public facts in
its Books
merits
public?
high scientific
search a
danger
artistic
authorities of status techniques ic
since that
the
over ? scientists prestige Ltd, ,
for they in If
by for complexities lay 64
of
of science work science 1956).
a
both
the work. Science
―altruism,‖
book them. losing a stress claim
represent public that but stakes
is is
What ‖
is
is
more very
its the to 65
his it is
a
CEU eTD Collection methodological fluidity at importan dedicated period‘s representation chapter, British construction chapters Harwell
Harwell
media
allows
I and SF to t.
look to
First, (e.g. follow
cinema.
the British of
s equated
for at
John overcame
the chapter British the
how
will an
Soviet
nuclear
publicity However,
Cockcr analysis
Harwell‘s him engage
government‘s on
the
espionage to news
oft‘s project
Harwell
unfavorable campaign
of
with before
space photo the image
in various
importance
case
I publicity and relation
graphy,
was commence
and was
representations involving the
constructed
aspects
how, changing
British
Polanyi‘s 26 newsreels
policy
of
by
on
media of
Harwell‘s
the
nuclear
the this regarding and
in
and end
and
study in of
newsreels question. was
post ―Big
of Bronowski‘s SF research
scientist
influenced his of
- the cinema.
war
Science‖ case
directorship
nuclear In and
Britain,
at
Chapter
studies, Klaus
large. how
concerns? by
found
project
the
these thus Fuchs).
In a III, at
developments chapter
the in Harwell
serving
I is
the study
The last
This
,
the as the
a
CEU eTD Collection 71 70 69 68 67 Roger presumably Alamos the to Fuchs,
in decided could and March, (New American scientists experimental
There TNA, TNA, TNA, Walter fellow
British C the
politics. HAPTER Harwell
Makins, Haven assemble report
head PREM PREM AB is
1950,
laboratory Benjamin, to
no scientist and
design.‖ use 16 wartime
such paving
had It of
and
/402, work.
engineers 1.
8/1279, 8/1279,
it is
made
―the Harwell
a
for
to impossible London: thing
II
British
The
“ See
be
Michael Only Visits
.
the gadget.‖ in the Reading visual, contesting verbal: science visual, British Reading cinema fiction and mission
“ world checke “
Arcades as Summary Klaus
David New design who
a ‘
way
an the documentsnewsreels 1950sashistorical of to Yale
s very diplomat
for theoretical ―atom Harwell, built
d,
―When FUCHS, hea Holloway, Mexico, Perrin.
of
for
on
University of Project a few
of
the nuclear
the dlines course:
the secret.‖ t
Statement he people
they first ” first
”
working
from Fuchs
Manhattan (Cambridge, March, first
during
Stalin
scientist,
physics Soviet studied in
all Soviet Press,
Making
knew Cabinet
early the Soviet
by
had 1950, and
bomb. same
at
1994), bomb which Dr. of the
even
history! Again burst that Please History division, February the i bombs the
the Office mmigrated Mass.:
Project,
information 27 K.E.J. 1. nuclear
calculations
Bomb: did
Stalin
Czechoslovakia intelligence See at 138. British
they he
of
the
is not the to
tell
Harvard
Fuchs Laucht,
gave decays publicity. inseparable
B.J.S.M. wanted
top may
confessed
the
Fuchs know 1950. weapons
Gaumont the
Embassy
Fuchs level,
to Soviet
of had away
not material. Elemental
Americans
University
that
Britain Information into a Secret
É lived
to Washington,
bomb
to had
migr 68
get
Union
from
they
be
― explosion
give
on images, Cru atom British
supplied, in
done,
their
and Apart
as é Cypher in were
scientific scientific
Germans
away Washington Press, and cified
German soon
1933.
Passed secrets what
worked
and
first
producing from
Atomic
cameras 14
not
a
as
Kurchatov 2002),
in
all formula (UK,
Telegram, July
69 ,
institutions, possible…
we
intimation
one t 34.
into
August o
the espionage ‖ scientist, As
Energy, Walter
the
at to 1948.
are
476. or theoretical
1940)
a
give D.C.
a s the the U.S.S.R.,
with two copy tories.
member and doing,
1949.
Los
Everything Soviets,
1939
men, July whi Benjamin finances
you
at Khariton newsreel of Klaus from
charges
67
the
ch the ”
and -
so
71 56 raw the 1948
one
of
a
70
CEU eTD Collection 77 76 75 74 73 72 Furthermore, was service, Although often practice. supposed (suspended were U.S. time
The deemed a Communist Studies Goodman, that February, the Suez and with The ―M.I.5 Historian TNA, TNA, Roger
big
now
British
Secretary of
sought Fuchs Sunday bitterly
tied
Acheson tripartite official did we relations He the Suez Crisis task
FO PREM 76 the
Makins
has in 74 necessary.‖
Suez
must [Acheson] slowly
not
inability
the the into
to 1950. ‘ the Michael
Crisis 371/93226,
The ― Atomic
ways ―
been (London: spying with
The can Post check Fuchs
attacked Physical think Canal‘s the Labour point 8/1279, Fuchs
would ‘ British
grin
of talks point
British be s
grandfather , was shaken
to
shattering,
5 the prognosis
Fuchs was Energy up Goodman State
overcome
bring March,
See to
case, there
of and a
Routledge,
later case on about had nationalization Cypher American GE
of
major and beneficial impose Government
hopes
view, on to Anon.,
nuclear
the
down
Dean
view. bear
case 22/53/
‖
Committee
the serve
no
1950, Biological was
was
both
informed of
275,000
diplomatic problematizes unless the
Telegram proved
core
wel suggestions
the
Acheson Nasser‘s of ―Not
things,
made
security G, Acheson. any as 199
He a
5.
not modus
sides
program
McMahon hydrogen
attaining
l major
by a
Letter
our
7). before
Even British thought only (part aliens
way
Sciences (1960 the
became
apparent correct.
the attitude no. scandal Egyptian unpleasant of
Fuchs from
for vivendi said clearance of Asked embarrassment
in
72 who Fuchs the
387 -
, Foreign Amba
bomb?:
64). the
as the
committed the a
which
there
34
C.E.
Act
close that to Atlantic.
from
involving to case… have aware
The British
diplomatic Soviet ‘ if
government. for (2003): ssador Communism
role
how They‘re
would
Steel Anglo in
these
28
Roger
was
settled though
Office Labour the matter i Anglo
n in
1946) But
historic program, that
matter to
line
to the
16.
many British - really Anglo to
American the developments
it have Makins Communists:
Roger
among
for
the Soviet
is
- represent
(FO) could blow with
the
See American
was United Government
and doubtful shipping sides
the could but previous to not -
Makins, conseq Anthony American government
alien (Washington us
and
severely the on
of
be also intelligence British be of
States much since
the
his the British
slowed best
American whether
route played infiltration
Britain Scandal for
uences nuclear
19
Iron Gorst the Suez ― brief would
(1952
the
third that
be
authorities October, and to
damaged
nuclear thermonuclear war.
Curtain.
British.
D.C.) the
the
handled and down down. of the
and
as - rendezvous
Crisis could
56) P
were
world
is
co Alien
Old clearly But menace and
M a
Klaus
Lewis imperative
overhauled.
to - and modern 1951,
operation.
Clement
co See if such
and Britain
As Hoyer
Canadian
bound by be in Influx
not as and - from power Fuchs,
operation
Johnman,
Michael
of
New
mean
1956. regards 2. done
Britain a a projects,
the chec
chairman suspended
Millar the
was with state, into
public to Dominions) ‖
It
‖ Attlee hidden
to
77 75 and k Historical
that
would secret dream
u
be.
Britain,‖
‘ may
nhappy
ease
the The s (FO),
arguing
was
felt
of He the
be be
.
73
2
CEU eTD Collection 79 78 treasured small Body technology subversion, companies British (e.g. bearer political complex the airplanes brief Seven campaign the
for Bloomsbury, Elemental that Peter Klaus
bomb public
case, Trial:
the
Fuchs‘ - Snatchers
In
town Days
and Biskind,
and Fuchs
the
Rosenberg convictions.
representation
equipped
― ‗Jekyll ‘ unless
which of
s Germans allies
destroyer
adopted
lawyers
American perfected
and made to autumn ignorance
r was 2000). epresenting
Seeing Noon
and threaten ‖ (USA,
deemed the is
—
possible , tried
cynical ‘ to 97. Hyde
a
s
of nuclear is (UK,
of a
science The by trial carry
film
Believing:
father, regarding to 1950, 1956)
life. schizophrenic of
Personality,‘‖ to ―
get
aliens
nuclear scientist
and 1950). a either industries.
to alter
78 the
a scientist, program
months
fiction reduction say is mother
Klaus
Senator
device
How ‖
a
the
the
by
endangering The the good science
is
(split mundane Hollywood a Fuchs
The nuclear genre
not
least after
or ends. capable
Infatuated of misuse on
in
Joseph example
his - high Press
- personality) evil, 1950)
screen
and
because the
that and sentence Tapping
project. -
and school
of Taught
1950s but of scientists Fuchs human McCarthy
29
often the and
human British of
with nuclear Journal
fragile,
and espionage Britain
how by
threatens
Us
into
way sweetheart. case, It dealt
a life.
the
plead
was to
discourse
, technology scientist as
on
‘ 11 annihilation the
British Stop of s with
79
British with had - a
― February,
for screen
important
life witch The positive recent
Worrying the trail
―controlled a
neither
press.
themes
—
split
Similarly, American steals
Government
of
- cinemas
that
hunts aliens
changing
Fuchs (e.g.
1950,
science
See
national
personality
for
to and
the emanate
the of
‖
Anon. schizophrenia.
initiate
nuclear his infiltrate 1. )
Love
case,
infiltration
A inspired
A
screened Christoph film Seven
- in - personal bomb one‘s
bomb
project. ―Atom the
with daily
the from Invasion a
science)
of
Fifties
Days serious a
most
nor film both
exploding
(in both Laucht Californian Scientist the
lives,
See
the
and and
his (London: the
to
film
shows
the Laucht,
case
the
of
or
Noon argues film
Sent the
a
a
CEU eTD Collection 80 to The concept instructive a currently, durin documents, experience fluid, nuclear adequate ( pay I oblivious already
―
have
more American History one‖? has network. imaginary
Historian resemble
attention Arcades
a g
This This flexible
―problematic
encountered
the See
balanced
science addressed
of of
methodology I to
cultural
David or
Science David ‖ analyzed think method chapter filmic in
‖ news the
is his
British
Project to
this and
an by
Seed‘s
school by whereabouts, S verbal Seed,
d approach
eed
45 montage representations
member,‖ juxtaposing respect, ―
concerns self historian is espionage/infiltration
a is real during
(2012): period. ,
would
nuanced
devoted inspired ― point Benjamin - Seven
contradictory. ‖ of documents, through )
and
Soviet
because
disagree is wouldn‘t my to 650. to
Days Vanessa
over irrelevant
studying
historic
sounds. analysis to but
by governmental
research.
which
sought
problematizing
to
dialectical
familial
the
(primarily also with
Noon it he Cold
be
R. historiography and
films A
narrative.
revolutionized It
me,
of of it visual
possible
:
to
Schwartz.
potential
is I Containing will a
War
the both
espionage.
argue arguing
matter arrange because important
montage.
newsreels)
documents, fact
be in culture
verbal to 30
of For relat in
possible
and construct
that
that they way
the f his Both this uture
example, 80 of
Seven ion
concep
for
historiography
and was Atomic depended
By ― narration
of
The poor chapter philosopher
organization.
and Benjamin to
a
a
newspaper making to
re
visual
Days equally cultural
network
the
scientist -
get tualizing reading papa Threat,‖ science
in
on
verbal.
to that
a
with
reminiscence.
his
a ‖ Noon sense
sense
solely
dominated
complex and historian planned
although If ‘
Walter
The
unfinished
s fiction Benjamin articles, by
quotes various
a
family cannot
Benjamin
country Schwartz
of by British of implementing
the representations Communist the
Benjamin, to
cinema
and to be
cultural personal workings
was
primary by Jo (or ― blow
‘
compared adopt
Every British s magnum urnal
images images approach, was a have
not family)
produced up
(or
for
an
historians particularly
of culture
only
documents
argued and the nuclear London.
―alien‖) to
―the the in
opus already
later
of
more order
fallen
is
for
CEU eTD Collection 84 83 82 81 mechanical medium resonate scientific been unique process can narratives mechanisms generations. imprint first, scrutinized. the words, Schwartz
Capture at hierarchy Status, her Lorraine ―…all Lorraine ―…photography Vanessa
other odds be
activities.‖ and widely What
rendered
one
historical
photographs value, of of
with
best
in
of
hand, Daston obvious,
R. image
Daston encourages
of
of the
montage,
Meaning
media must
does device, Schwartz.
contingent what
addr Acknowledging
of governmental and suited
moment.
See
the power
and - could and by
making
meaning applied adopt this essed. experience.
historian Donna
encode assumption
verbal (Minneapolis
Peter
the a Peter
to
or
―Walter
mean? no camera, and historians
complicates
take
cameraman a the
at The In longer
Galison,
Schwartz, Galison, had
(and sophisticated a
mutually
anoth
information
photographer‘s history
assemblage up
censorship Donna
Benjamin to photograph How
that The
be the
makes
er.‖ be the is and
Objectivity
to ―The
seen
produced
that
defining
―Objective
mid
the
investment See is
of mantle
London:
adopt ‘ Schwartz the s
history
as for
science, Image
photographs. choice when way John -
nineteenth must
verbal first a —
of Historians,‖ point
unified ―
cultural
a
—
(New
steals
of Tagg, University images
the
a
of nuanced
Representati
pushing example.
and imbedded photogr
be ‘ of objectivity, of
Objectivity,‖
s Lorraine approach in ―
York: work: view medium top 31 ‖ arranged
subjects The they
spaces
photographic the
century
and
‖ The
to
Disciplinary
84 of
and were
analysis aph
the Zone present
82
― bottom
on: Photograph‘s in Minnesota
American sounds, whose Photography
in
Daston the It
to
camera which
or produced or
Representations based
as
Photographs
Books,
a can
turn
institutional reading
the film photograph to
status of and ‖
stem what
create ‘ Frame:
or model. the towards framing
Historical
s on ‘ Press, verbal 2007). is
s
locally and preserves
―
and button
mechanical made the editor applied
visual from
apparent as
emerged
a 2009), requirements Peter
Photographic value
popularly However,
Facts,‖ and
visual
40 and in mechanical or
Review
depends
the
is
one at
information,
(1992):
general. on
were
unevenly
visual. 12. Galison one able it
most
in
is a impression for objectivity
as
objectivity
106 point
Bonnie strip inherent
able
to 81
the held constraining the
future
on Truths 81
depressing
- (2001): create In ‘
across 128
objectivity
s might
In
visu of photograph to the
article film, view Brennen
while other with and film?
make and
al
a
ca of be 1724. ‖ a
in
by that tered
has the his totally 83
the
it.
at The an and
o the
)
or
n a
CEU eTD Collection 85 belief work establishment 2.1. Thepost British age support studying British questions representations companies. censorship narratives. when picture fr to om
Bloomsbury, 1999), Hanno
Jason the ncies?
studying
on The I studying impression that
-
discuss
E. science
173 making Hardt, or
Br
the
Hill
arising
access
the challenge The in and itish By
representation
2015),
and Picturing
relation
British of
the
161.
my visual fiction giving first
enables and post
Vanessa Harwell
of from
that photograph
methodology 105.
information to one
- - the
war government and war
public, media.
the to mechanical
accounts c be
the
inema. one
R. deals
the visual
Past: particularly nuclear in
study Schwartz,
of
to late nuclear 85
as
Media,
with
nuclear and understand
I
tropes
of
loyal
will on 1945. of and
research,
representations how film
the visual Getting the
program. History,
give approach
taxpayers,
sensitive established
science
As
British British itself, the
my documents. minutes picture the nuclear publicity nuclear
government led and
Picture: it own
These
and government
post 32 to by
to Photography is
have
-
reading
the to (e.g.
important
making director
scientists. view of -
war
governmental concern
The
visual meetings
the The
photography
allowed
nuclear of Visual
right
visual
policies
‘ John second (Champaign, the s
markers
to
strategies How newspapers
Cul
genre to keep show,
Cockcroft, program documents or
ture know
narrative
did as ― restricted
meddling
in or
one
and
of well
scientists
IL:
science
mind
towards
film) the about
often why University was and
as
News
expressed
by will
the were theoretical access
‖
debated newsreel the I
fiction
looks
giving
of find publicity (London: employed
deal processes
development
news
―real.‖ of
to it
Illinois across
with
cinema
strong two
useful from news
and
Apart
to of
Press, the
for
CEU eTD Collection 88 87 86 secret exhibit Christoph energy Exhibition. the German concerns or time operation? to might meeting information should of
journalists), b 593. education Permanent
Christoph ―… TNA, ease the nuclear ut
workings
that being. Mr.
lending January react
be and the AB the
we é reveal Perin
exte
migr
open in
Laucht
research. Lau 16/402,
American Guided Secretary, 87 prospects
should to
The to
and on the
The of nded and
cht, move of é th
1947
a the
Atom
follow, to scientist nuclear imperative e
constant visual I
watch
― “
argues PM opening the feel Minutes
Atoms beyond by workings
5 In
away decision
Train
of
McMahon
May,
Press bound rather this was
a what
information nuclear
energy
meeting for
Rudolf that
of
exhibition,
preoccupation
from concern, 1947, particularly of
the
than of the the to and the
of to
the Harwell
suggest
the
Americans people: potential
Meeting
lead, and 2. the this energy the
that
Peierls Act,
British
held
1947
1947 ―
the build
ease secret in from even awe that
the which
to on this
held
sensitive
author for , - Exhibition
press
1948, do a Atomic
Atomic took
press the of
and
25th the the the Press matter.
Establishment. on (they
― the
laymen induced
anxieties
‖ bomb 25 Ministry horror most ities it
visits
The October visits
visit 33
British Scientists
‖ will on October
to
Scientists See
British
were was to visual themselves
intelligent
presumably (and ‖ ‖ . to
TNA,
a Harwell How was images
widely
Harwell. halt of
governm 1946, 1946, ‘ to
reluctant Journal Association, leave
Supply 86
information severely display
AB
‘ will in
However,
Association ” should
4 of
16/402, Cockcroft Anglo felt be
visitor
it
to November,
publicity
for ent
British
Hiroshima under
out
to
educate to by
the
the not
damaged
with
the external
-
allow
of Note American organi
could
History
civilian
pressure be
arising the
British
the nuclear
‘s
allowed explai
how 1946, affect from
the
minutes
(ASA) press
public zing not and
of
by users.
state
from British
the from F.C. uses
1 ned Science
- glean the nuclear scientists, for Nagasaki.
PM 2. an visits
Americans
and
intention How their discussion).
the
from that of British However, press Atom
Attlee
nuclear public
45 time nuclear
for own to
Harwell co
(2012): this
visits
Train the being, -
led ‘ desire
s
to on
the by 88
CEU eTD Collection 90 89 important with competence government themselves energy inspired atomic Two to to exhibition imposed independently policies over
February,
TNA, TNA, bridge support
Cultures in t he In The attract photographs interests photographs The The
for exhibition AB AB late
regarding
October to accompanying
by the
1952. because Former Labour Labour
nuclear of 16/1216, 16/1057, civilian
host
on 1951.
B felt and
public
gap 1947
ritish
debate
from development (e.g.
international
vulnerable
independence
1952, (between
R.E. of
government g
Prime
photographs scientists‘ ― 330/6/8, were of Britain
purposes. is
overnment attention scientists European to American
their
in a the
stimulate
text France,
Britain
1959. documentary entirely
Minister
Atomic
own, ― was
-
Photographs: nuclear and book
Travelling
of 90
to nuclear wish and
Only
efforts. felt lost British
the
exploded nuclear were who
of the were dependent.
staff free
example Energy
American
was
British
third to uneasy the
science project
after
replaced
resurrected
from Britons educate exhibitions recruitment)… Exhibition, film
governments
The always Publ subse energy.
country
its the
Production
nuclear
. about
production. on icity, security
89 British and
However,
first
practices quent
Americans
(this F.C. the
a reluctant
‖ ‖ 34 Lagging partly the
Note 1954. to during
initiating
A of
public
research.
How, tim - government elections
independently
objections respective bomb
British failed
from or Establishments
e adopted failed high
under
to the on
on behind initiated lamented
R.E.
off
appro public to
behalf hopes achievements the A
and attempt
independently
Australian -
France
the bomb public) it at
workings
pondered
the
ve
was the
the
a
discussions Conservative of
of produce
on
successful the United
to Conservative
displaying tests for the highest
co whether
the
well
Permanent publication nsidered
the Press. shores.
of
previous b in in
etween and before States,
British mo
carve late harnessing level.
of in international
Even
deliver dern
government)
British
Secretary,
The nuclear our undesirable 1952
C.P. a
Party the the governmental
The of
government
place
science own event where
British efforts as
an
Snow scientific
train
nuclear took
energy
6 well
air for
was
the
- and
‘ to
s as
CEU eTD Collection 95 94 93 92 91 worked and they The to public. work governmental that 1951. Movement. film Commonwealth. inconspicuous produced right importance borne
to
TNA, TNA, TNA, William Anon. produce
work makers affiliations
a first
switched
media
carried Preparations film William A 93
,
AB AB AB
outside -
“
on bomb,
Documentary choice Since
Penney by
be 16/567, 16/567, 16/567, a the
91 of who rendering
film the
out
made
film 1946 Frankel
exploding
British
Penney,
the were
after the
was for
B were throughout
It
― 19 30 330/6/7/7, ritish
on for project Bikini company
was
CFU. directing to also January, March,
- the particularly
somewhat
A of countryside once show the to
a one produced
National government
United Atoll this 95 the Stuart British
documentary
was 26
1952.
of Stuart part
1952.
the
British first Crown
formidable was July, A the
- of
bomb Legg Asset, work
States
of
few ambitious scientist
troublesome
bomb, and national Cyril 1951.
Legg
to the
Establishment B Film
showing
” tests. the
to ritish of directed
Documentary
world (1945)
Frankel. came
film
lead
the Harwell event. Australian
working Unit
and scientists
lines
British
- of the
famous
from the and
for by international
(CFU) 35
the Operation
‖
It
project
and
production
with the the
News
the
on is who
and first the
government test
not
interwar
other most government the had Soviet
an have British
Letter whi
British site,
as
clear
bomb
acclaimed
already
Hurricane
a ch acclaimed British remained
importance,
5, producer?, metaphorically of Union
were
from British Documentary
1944,
‘ A
the s was
-
design, bomb
in been nuclear
atomic not
in the
(1949). 42
documentary employing interested
(UK, the Documentary British -
43.
available
archival
shooting
but tests
the
United propo
establishments bomb 1952)
security Equal
authorities uniting
Film documentary started
States in sed
people sources
films for
from
is securing
Movement filmmaker. to
in
a Film
the
concerns the after in the
film July
of the
late
who sought
British
why
the the .
92
1951 the
War
The
94 in
CEU eTD Collection 100 99 98 97 96 that until Gammans government news (newsreels) companies, access with colleagues. stand (TNA) for 1930s.
E.H. produce do May, TNA, TNA, ―… Although
CCA, a
the young
the
it 1955), wide
reporting. Although Incidentally type 300,000,000 number News However, for.
Peck,
1952,
is
to
The testifies job AB FO
FICA
brigadier an
our 97 theatrical
the accordingly
theatrical 371/105692, wrote
th 16/567,
July people excellent
produced Unfortunately, In
1. who were reels with own to at
2/2/1, initial
of Washington,
pay does 27,
to
the A
even atomic
people would
a
the [sic] not ‘ “
1953, the
news
Film are document s
letter
“ people p production more screens,
figures Churchill
lan careless not
distribution
so
following
deemed
the film GE
importance
the
weapon
in
on
was they
1.
be
who reels listen
to
1/4/G, attention
this
media the
dominant
see
was
given to
the Viscount
mentioned had
a and
the
Atomic exhibition
and
listen shoot found
country British also without
prestigious
them. much
film
Letter of to
conviction: - the government
aware should
in selected
opt
indeed
British a
earn to Cameraman,
to
test, Britain split color in
cinema
from
for Most to assistance Swinton brigadier
newsreel
are the
PM
by go ” Conservative
the the a
of
Written
film, during
black
Roger high
far seen 9 government as the
material
of
this
Winston
BBC country and - o‘clock
to going OH
had
the this
MP ” from
and (Secretary
quality show by important Makins Letter productions.
Jehu 36 by
abroad.
the
. production
nor 99
to
public white
should N. 30,000,000
them.
audiences on
the a be
projection news) Churchill
took from
Dugdale,
read government
lot
96 to
the
hoped American very production. ‖
An and
Pierso
is
See of
David
of not film. on
tests, the
team
and
between
dollars
anecdote
careful State
the TNA, A
himself
9
be n Operation should.
newspapers ‘
people
98
s April, and had member Gammans Dixon taking
public even
British
papers taken In
See
FO for
did trouble .
100 the order
in 17 1952,
(FO),
TNA, 371/105692,
to though from
Commonwealth that
This each
the not
their with
officials
and u
government project of
to
Hurricane
rges
finding
we
2. not
world
focus
July very
Viscount AB parliament, was the week
25 approach
assurance, can
the
to
the 16/567,
23,
National
years
intelligently. OH
a a quite
were
jeopardize on GE
as
medium
(more suitable time 1953, Conservative
Swinton,
a
all 1/4/G, to
(
was effectively OH 2 of
whole
furious to
a Relations when May, aspects 1. David the
age than
group Arc
newsreel camera )
anxious
Notes would
fact
24
the 1952. -
hives
the
the
of of
to by
CEU eTD Collection 105 104 103 102 101 Government. who contrary government peculiar screens, News ― audiences events, newsreels propaganda widespread newsreels tensions target early television visual Consensus ideological University
Leo John TNA, Czechoslovakia ―…
stated
1950s ing
Films from films Enitcknap,
Jenkins. with histor
103
FO representation felt
to a
in were and held
of but (London younger
that are what 1110/50, meanings.
the
cinema
were were strategies.
was a by
Britain 105 California y
voice seen ‖ British
― in
a chapter
Hot newsreels
newsreel already
“ Furthermore, to
Crucified
a The interested wide fact, an also
few not
and the
- News/Cold
P.F.D. - going audience. ‖
had over important No
See
simply
SF Berkeley,
a New
newsreels distribution audiences. ‘ However, recent
n of s acquainted time -
not
Tony (UK, Fiction
epigraph, Tennant companies featur
commentary. the were consumption,
York: in
as
been
when
War:
1940) British depicted Shaw, guiding the Relations
passive
2000),
medium
e Film never
I.
to
were
films.
this
102 IRD widely The B.
network. R.
science
would with
British in
Tauris,
and Some 178.
‗
Murray, media
study
reflectors British
a
Post and
well archives
events.
The Newsreels,
serious
during
with
the as
initiate
dispersed,
- Cinema
exclaim
War
manipulating
- 2001),
British fiction well
101 cooked relates State, historians events
subject), 21
newsreel ‘
Britain, IRD
but 37
the April, preoccupation
also
as
a
2. and Propaganda,
as
stronger
films
newsreel
1950s, that to
for
are as
and archives
as
potentially testify the 1948.
”
but two
a (PhD
ha their
not it companies
they
Cold non
served were the
ve would
newsreels
different
both
covered diss.,
co
to
-
importance argued,
were producers, production and War: fiction testify
-
becoming active the of operation,
with in
the be University
the The
government bringing
their
would
in News
types
as
producers
film to evolved for
delicate
post
State,
the
breaking how
pre
like instance
of in Media, more genre,
- following of particularly soon of
war Propaganda
- governmental newsreels.
― television,
the
Exeter,
British
films: raw
of around care
‘
‖
prominent, British s political
try
post
depict news (PhD
knowledge history John
as
to 1999), British
- Gaumont
decade.
war
bringing to diss.,
ease
104
and
(the
because
Jenkins, and topical
provide ‖
63.
This
British
to
the also
the The
is
a
CEU eTD Collection 109 108 107 106 in films representations And cinema before practice. image claim Newsreels arose. of and media filmmakers. about 149. 1948, Photographic words McFarland
conjunction sound, Raymond Phillip TNA, Philosopher
were,
at
merging Newsreels 109
to how
‖ and for
a
last, are
experience
in
FO
feature objectivity During Woods, In
newsreels
Chandrika sustaining of
to
sound. would
difficult
&
1110/850, Fielding, every 106 the
visual
course,
Message, Roland Company,
developments with
Media
but 1950s ―‗ film, WWII, potency
Business not British representation,
Kaul, was
also The it
while feature Barthes
adopted 1956. silent an
‖
taking ch was
historian
British in 2006),
American
a
illusion ange discussi
Media newsreels Susan
cinema and cultural
as
displaying
to
renderin argued
films? Usual?
ten
45.
sometimes commentary
of their
influence
cinema
and Sontag,
the
Phillip
nuclear Newsreel: ng of minutes
that
during
‘ experience the
easier
form British were post gs the
news B
A a
was of ritish
Woods Barthes future highly
-
it
on
imperial ene in
influen used
the
formidable of A is Newsreel
pho and
an
the Complete rendering
to Empire rgy the early
tographs
construct important with
of to
Reader
mediated narration, post
sees
38 program. ce in
paint
British Britain.
Coverage
(Basingstoke, post Britain the b -
History, war post oth
events. gain (New
cultures
propaganda. the work - war
― space - thermo setting, experience
war 107 real meaning by
In
wartime (as York: of 1911
period, 108 Newsreels of a which
Indian ‖
British
displayed)
fusion lies for
Hampshire:
and British
However,
nuclear Hill
-
but
See through 1967
viewing
in
Independence
― efforts their
and newsreels
through imaginary will
Roland
newsreels their with
(Jefferson, documentary
Wang, were
tests.
words
propaganda Palgrave be on
with
the pecul on
nuclear Barthes,
able
newsreels
creative
introduced 1983),
What both
and feature, were
‖
the
and North
as iar
incarnations. Macmillan, to
the
an
― sides.
wide Partition,
exhibition
197 provide The kinds exhibited
closer
Carolina: significance editing important
the -
were 198.
spread
in
of 1950s the
2006), 1947 1909
a
seen
of
-
CEU eTD Collection 113 112 111 110 knowledgeable the Part satirical nuclear in during was became apparent assassination annihilation year obvious for How 2.2. British 1950sscience fiction cinema A.S. radiation Atomic Harvard factory. went year,
hope
The Contamination See TNA, illustrating sati
screened of
in I
Scholars Halford
on a
Christoph
Learned British the re
its
w
group
research of
Age more FO comedy. limitations
I a
University
in hich
radius to
write
pastiche first ending 1950s,
371/129246
1964,
(Berkeley, be
had
to civil
of
of
six accustomed
the anti
more
the
of C.T. effective, of Laucht
citizens minimum. to incident
President
been and
organization
- years
American Hence,
Western film when as nuclear nuclear Stop Press,
anxieties
representation
Crowe, on to
it
power. California:
2010;
and replaced the with a
was was
involving after
Worrying
2004); a nuanced
weapons
CND comic the
FO
large 7
tests. thermonuclear J.F.
to
public
Irony nuclear Peter
in in April,
brought Campaign
the The 371/12924 film the
cinemas, Margot 1954
in
Kennedy.
Universi
by 113
number
Japanese Goodchild,
effects
my first figures
march threats and 1954.
study second
an
is stems
more The cultures
next (the
d incredibly
A. on March
satire
for
1,
ty Love
from
such
bomb
public Henriksen,
of 1964, and
chapter.
fishermen of by 1957.
of year of timely
from Nuclear reason I
Edward
attitudes
am
California Britons
the intensive
London‘s
as are often
the personalities
to testing.
of
actress
was
the was not
―
Aldermaston. present 39 stereotypical
topics Bomb
nuclear Disarmament the for
who Dr. Teller:
choose
satirical
implying
already
already
wrote
See
to Press, Lucky Trafalgar Vanessa the
Strangelove
nuclear found
nuclear (
like
TNA,
USA
in
The limitations doomsday.
to open 1997). should a
a themselves genre
the
well Dragon
Real
more Redgrave
analyze that , ( FO square
time
CND 112 in tests. 1964
science
Vietnam ‟
protest
s
371/110695, its Dr.
acquainted The
‘ the
America: be
s ), homely when
110 to
)
representation
characteristic was Strangelove ‖ incident
of
reduced by
and the
nuclear the in situa
In
However,
Dr.
and
letters established the
director
threats Aldermaston Britain, philosopher War, film
Society
tion
fashion Pacific
Strangelove
scientists. GE
111 with
threat to
Dr.
to
or (Cambridge, ), 18/25, was
of the
Stanley
and the Dr. but the
Ocean the
in the — Strangelove
of by
nuclear
Bertrand
different was 1958.
nuclear
Culture Government,
film
Letter people recent in Strangelove
scientists. threats
looking First,
within order
is
n
Kubrick
The
ot has Mass.:
that
from
weapons
Russell, in
the
of same
the
for the
at
it Or:
is
CEU eTD Collection 116 115 114 unworthy the devoid driven approach strongly visual around vis meant culture. choosing tradition of actors limitation M film (London: on
inutes
characters, -
CND James Nicholas titles à
21 shot - vis I
(like phen
the
April studies. study of the London
Both
Chapman, advocating Warning.
of
( ―
during this
(studying Devil Palgrave the of mass of blurring
Mirzoeff.
publication
omena Peter the 2015.
scholarly
the
SF
Benjamin ― film because
116 to
artistic
Hollywood culture Girl
the film, films
Aldermaston
Sellers), Mark This Macmillan,
genre merit Just
between
The
films
a Campaign from
move paradoxically,
aura.
in certain enquiry,
Glancy meant ‖ Visual of time
and
scholarly paradigm. is
contrast
that Nicholas Mars; the
closely ‖ ―
2007), ― March Schwartz in
to
star
Culture
Though low and
a were behaviors film
film
boil growing for their -
Sue system Attack ‖
, to
4
attention. and Easter
related - both Nuclear
Mirrzoef From directed your 5.
studies Reader
the
Harper.
cultural lay
to
have
―
‖
of visual some hi secures
interest are 1959, in last
the in
gh to (London the
its from The
argued
Disarmament
automatically place by
‘ More ‖ egg, my s and late
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8t it
Crab brow high
tropes formidable 40 New ―
would box
for artists methodology
the ‖ social 1990s,
since and
currently,
- is for
Film
budget - the
Monsters culture. late
office
written estab New
‖ an seem
ignored
History: significance early
e.g. particularly
1960s
‘s egalitarian
York: reader, ascribed
lished production. s
(
uccess
It
Stanley CND that works on ) 1920s.
also and
would
Sources,
French
Routledge, or one
just in 115 )
obscure
understanding
meant
and March to in
newsreels
of it Kubrick) for
study within
a
deem
actors new
-
became
Methods,
the mere By inspired limits
the
1998).
the
to signs. employing of film film
these Cold the
because glimpse
Aldermaston
shattering culture. .
the
to
apparent - The
Approaches
go group productions history ―
114
more
auteur
War films development - of xEL4
reason A
visual
of
at
t
This
gathered acclaimed
period au
last, ,
‖
are some the Accessed that of
dience
.
for
―
― long the
art all 4
is
of
‖
-
CEU eTD Collection 121 120 119 118 117 study. denied afford like budget. these British represented limitations infiltration the Communism collectively, understood Foreign British indispensable. necessary and London: Suvin, main
Darko Shaw, Steve ―… See industrialization
Star
the films British
not
formal Steve Ac costly
access 121 scientific ―
Metamorphoses
Chibnall,
cultural Office quota
British Suvin Wars ‗ Yale tors
real
and Because
narratives) and
were the Chibnall
in
device
which
‘
special SF
was
’
University sufficient and
s 117 to history,
) 1950s quickies.
Cinema
tastes
importance as rendering give the
“
cinema,
acclaimed produced Quota project. This
not a actresses is
and they topics would means
an of a of
effects
but
Bri
of
the and
more conditions
was
of
its imaginative Quickies Brian Press,
the
Science ‖
of a did tain,
118
audiences. with
changing SF only the
constructed
had the
induce
of as British due
of
film
could nuanced Furthermore,
and McFarlane, not 1979), Cold
cinema
genre
at propagating ―
British
” its to Fiction:
menace quota :
to
are
a The have
outer workers.
be
framework War,
often time
the the develop ‖
countryside is
7 the
post
See
- Birth
version topical
8. -
particular is
view quickies
1950s vast e high - presence
On 33.
The
space
ffect when during Chapman, interesting tongue -
war
of the
the The
British
resources
British
more of number of the
alternative
and
of
Poetics audiences
ly Britain.
extravaganzas.
Harwell history
how
f and ‖
British -
the ilm lack instructive combating , is in 41
in ensuring Glancy “ complex
- B another
interaction
cheek
achievements. 1950s. ” nuclear for medium a
and
of of that
Film
“ domestic
(a to B
sought cinemagoers analysis
―
”
s History the and in - accords the
Film 1970s for (London: attitude
Although a marker viewing
author characters Communism.
Harper, science
of star my fast was
(London: Second,
estrangement to
of
setting. with
thesis.
Hollywood for
system ’
production a s be
taken
is British
Historian empirical Literary (devoid The
newsreels the two and
represen able
watching not
, “
Palgrave
SF New the because
ideological
The very
‖
Film main scientists
comparable to is 119 is
Genre
budget and
… Film e of
transcend
beneficial
nvironment.
companies
science Tony However, on seriously In a ted
Communist Macmillan, cognition, reasons.
literary and stitute, both
History
they a (New
as values
limited
restrictions
were Shaw feature
the
American
fiction were
2009), genre Haven processes
,
the
” 120
for
by 7. of
and exemplary
See could
2007).
its
First,
the
not my
whose
films
whose
Darko and makers films
not
and
CEU eTD Collection renderings in images? newsreel stock in environments these expected
the British
films, footage 1950s.
The
and to science
of
portray portrayed
fusion
The
what John and in
the
next fiction transcend
is Cockcroft
a of film.
a certain
by
genres chapters science
cinema.
unknown This
the role
and enables
allows fiction
will limited
Furthermore, pre the
B
address - -
destined Harwell rate me a cinema
shooting scholarl
to actors,
trace this
if establishment. for
42 financial
y
they
more
locations.
were work different them
are
concretely
changing
on by
limitations both
the
the representations How
providing representations studio
according does
by
probed . a
The one study
similar
say scientists
of
to
filmmakers
of
nuclear
the of what
cross
narratives
nuclear
situations
is found -
media
scientists a
to
science
use and in
and
CEU eTD Collection 122 revolves involving science factory. touch documentary same and re Koepler‘s nationalities achievement commemorate 27. ached CHAPTER III.
Anon.,
extolled
time, ―Ladies to
represented
Spaceways British
the around “
Sir a directorship,
the
variety
bomb, . among John nuclear
celebrated ―You and
Deanfield‘s British
cinemas
tensions
Cockcroft:
gentlemen
Constructing Cockcroft: British represen Cockcroft:Constructing British
by of
also have on us, independence,
talent invoking audience
film is but
revolved both
a
all
between
represented
year
The
(
only
fictionalized was worked in
a the
alchemist
a after toast
manifold could
a one
secret
technological
around governmentally the
although
the with to team.‖ scientist, 1945
scientists. in see ’
s and Deanfield!‖
first dream
the
top
the seamless scenes the
heavily
The
- British
British be household He research Without
discourse secret the
documentary was
43
accomplishment
identified
has It research of stockpiles
fulfilled,
backed is
energy
controlled Britons Professor British
film
A
made - for
any on 1961 -
bomb, of
name…
Professor Spaceways
the ”
establishment,
―home fuss, they science The
the to
research Operation working were
applications
achieve
Koepler in New environment, name
are Cockcroft tations of apost tations of
as an If ly far The
Scientist —
Koepler ever Cockcroft
well science.‖
atmosphere
establishment) (UK, of from at
this. ―Big New
Hu
raises Fort a
man
as
under disused
,
rricane of
1953). abundant. has
There 12 Scientist ’ Science‖ the
s
Halstead
the
atomic
and his
mentorship September, Although
and
directed
British Professor
of
film‘s
glass -
are . institution airfield The
war nuclearwar
Harwell. The national
scientific energy…
article,
— At many
arms
film
―homely‖ to
narrative
British
1957, the the
and a
122
pride
1957
can 26
-
CEU eTD Collection 124 123 Oliphant on establishment Oliphant the Cockcroft science to V as authorised full acknowledging perils showing international Deanfield‘s -
John J optimistic
CCA, CCA, to
time consultation Day.
cite Oli engineers good and Vigorous as …it British behind
Cockcroft than
CKFT CKFT
a in
nuclear phant
provides wrote
A
the
rapid real
is in
us Canada.
men
letter
scientific
a Encounter
the scientists s in inefficiency an
to
25/27, 25/27, cie of matter
factor
states
on
action progress. British 1945.
or
will proceed important Picture with a research ntists from
on a the British British
Cockcroft Oliphant Letter
list
neither
in
of that
14
the atmosphere
administrators
now
working
were ‘ Australian government‘s
the o s vital
September Post
at
f
from
If Defense ― Rudolf but
of body post
scientists
the scientific
world once!‖ will to no
join contesting the practical
represents
1945 Cockc
Marcus
- clash was plants
war
to
on attract
government
the
Peierls
-
of
alleviate tackle
Council born, Unfortunately,
the finishing roft,
article, nuclear
1945 of
willing industry project project.
Oliphant
who are support
importance first
the
civilizations 2. the
, Cavendish
workings
further
built German
paints
are
best
wrote and future on British research.
to
nor
to his
Professor to
and for -
essential
and
screen
John work 44
of his
set
remain wa a develo
the a
politics
of our
the slightly
émigré
to
of the inspection space - distressing up rtime ‖ Cockcroft, trained
British 123 on
this narrative.
project:
a
tensions British
technical a
research
post Koepler
pment
for
nuclear
i body
n
mission. work country
depends scientist
different it,
its -
physicist post war
14
whether post
―I
for of
success. . of
letter
on
Spaceways Oliphant,
September, effort men concludes research
am
- scientific our
nuclear
war the -
and
Canadian war The on to
picture happy
to
work, and
work Marcus
Britain, nuclear is our the they
124
nuclear film Cockcroft,
on
and will science.
represented
1945, Empire,
position
institution
to the
on are represents General an on
is
atomic
announce outlines ―Mark‖
ensure science is
not nuclear
inadequate address the scientists 1. research
also
The
impl
i and who in mportance
Haze piles,
urging
enthusiasm
T.A.
and
alongside as Oliphant those a
research. letter with icitly our
was that group
was
early and
has the
scale, when future
that the at after goes
not
as of of
CEU eTD Collection 126 125 of important places basis resul and project, critical research Harwell, representations exemplary Cockcroft‘s places only scientists found need nuclear of do The
an British Gowing, Margaret not
technological
t
from of
Macmillan — extensive
Historian of
soon, on in
seem
towards research. that
Gowing
John
the in
the
the
were
their scientists
components their
Independence
British Gowing, 1974,
image special Oliphant
excellence intere two post
Cockcroft,
Press,
effort interested
ideological were campaign of the
deemed
- names It
in
war history.‖ sted.
science nuclear Independence
across
was L and someone. which, 1974).
persistently abour is pessimistically
research and
of
The astounding of their apparent became
it William
in modern
manifol
to scientific Margaret scientist Deterrence
126
―… positions
government‘s she
letter promoting represent
suitability,
If There
and system. the scrutinized
the inseparable
strong
that
d opened society‘s Penney
Deterrence:
most and who
British
person men Gowing I
is
, to predicts
both
57.
Cockcroft
of
governmental testifies
In
fight
that was
onto successfully
working
course
the lines and
this
the
media. the who proper
to by
able published
the
Britain question, who
the
Christopher scientific chapter,
45 British
British
of
the to
will
―enemy,‖ no
and
end to
command and I the was functioning.
end
and doubt argue lead
lead
Harwell executed and
of
late conducting nuclear
late
to I because a Atomic of
community
physics study
British
classic
the
be
industrial that
that
1960s Cockcroft‘s Hinton. but 1950s
and the
British
Energy,
favorably.
project
Cockcroft this the rather,
programme
This, of
work leading
post in secrecy
British
public
the
construction
Oliphant‘s
was, The Britain.
funding
and
- nuclear 1945
I . war
program to 125
on
argue, directorship
emphasis
.
according
secure figure
view
British
surro
was Although
British - science.
1952, in
Therefore,
for project
is represented long British of unding
on in
of their
in research Volume soci
s nuclear
Gowing British cientists
day John part The to
description
at over
ety is
jobs
Gowing, scientific the times -
to British not
the
I was
- (London:
not
day and
as
as result
very
in an
a
CEU eTD Collection 128 127 chapter looking my my 1960s adhere way of nuclear society very politics respectively) her Furthermore because science (1992): History elements pr
ideological Shapin Leah
ocedure analysis thesis, book,
through valuable Regardless However,
renderings
to
frequently Price.
science, ―The and
at was 342. new and
argues 127 from the
was first although
Sociology not society of ,
Gowing‘s
How
the declassified testifies resolution Men.‖ if
for both deemed ramifications.
the
that newspaper entirely
we
Gowing from often
of to the of
orientations extolled
construction ―Anglo
. were
do
128 I my scientists?
of
argu to
will
to
British separate things
hostile
divide
Science
be
criticism of
‘ post to
-
s
materials American‖ ment. an touch
renderings work debates
its
trace with
eclectic - towards In
war policy from
policy between
scientists. as
I
other
and
books
The
upon
seen has
think the
towards
British society,
on selection
history have -
scientific
repre -
not making, late materiality
th
making.
words, in
of this
science?
rough the the
Victorian
been Cockcroft
Gowing‘s 1960s become but sentation
understanding
of Gowing
question latter volumes
of
the science
change.‖ although British
serves the adequately How
46 Externalism To and
Britain might of
respective available
and what
in Gowing‘s of
decision and did throughout
early (on See not scientists to
the
the
(Prin
be
paint her
Gowing's solely
I
Steven ― 1970s of extent
policy finish -
scrutinized. 1970s exemplary an Internalism ‗factors‘
ceton: methodology, science since
t
the interesting
indebted o
work,
was Shapin. are
divide Cockcroft was - it
m was
Princeton scientists
it
representation and ―eclectic,‖ with those aking
was
as
Gowing Debate, as
a scientist to ― a
This Discipline somewhat the
period
judicious a Leah
society.
first ‖
that study, discussion
University
‘ and I work
s
as
‖ acknowledging is find
depiction.
History written are
Price influenced
individuals
an
in in ― ―…
independently admixture
nuclear
and
on
her
fighting
which unf Britain of separate
the
suggests Press,
Bounding: British of
Cockcroft
work ortunate, of in
proper Science
Gowing‘s
I 1974 science British
by begin of 2012). by
that
their
devoid
still
from
in . 30 The
of
‖
CEU eTD Collection 129 Nevertheless, nuclear underline photograph which public information under 3.1. Constructing Cockcroft 100,000,000 that fresh
The
power.
―The
Picture
power a article image
research man
t he
Man The
is ‘ for
supplied s Atom
(Cockcroft)
and
importance subtitle relating Post masterfully
her Government
in was
British Stake, industry.
‘s charge
describes
article governed in
the ‖
it, Picture
nuclear
of
seen
project The done backs goes will
introducing a
the
scientists
single
from
Post serve by
that to strolling urgency
re to
convey other
, search. claim
7
the one
man
as December
claim
of
a
back
Cockcroft. political with man on
the starting in
the
The
that,
the
this
matter: its
is
has grim
1946,
47
research first wit walking site
project.
and
a point hin
129
― humanizing financial
of 9 Britain, photograph
- a scientific
10.
This
Britain‘s station couple
for
on The
poor further article, an
prospect at of latter
isolated
Harwell.
decades, bodies in
undertone. first is
oil,
a renderings particularly is,
film atomic and
of naturally, ‖
besides terrain. the
See
hard - Britain, noir
atom
Anon.
- pile‖ pressed
of
inspired
Cockcroft. can (Fig. the
false
, Cockcroft‘s
but
― is
supply Our visual
for
a
2 also —
)
caption
£
coal, one, The
British
much
to
needs
in
of
CEU eTD Collection son representation
Christopher. When
the
—
readers
(Fig.
Cockcroft
3
) turn
is the
photographed,
page,
a
grim
and in
48
a
noir less Fig.
-
ish artistic 2
prospect
manner,
becomes
with
his
a
familiar
four - y ear
old
CEU eTD Collection 130 of knowledge (Fig. runs reproduction
homeliness, Anthony
a 4) Tracing
cover
It
is
James.
of
that
rendered of
science the
love,
a
of The
similar ma
a
Happy
kindness teriality scientist,
in for
a
rendering humanity.
similar Passion:
of
and
teaching
this
fashion modesty. A
resurrects
Pe photograph The rsonal
and
photograph
to
guiding View that
today. 49
Fig. is
of of
an
Jacob the
the
3 For
of interesting
photograph
Cockcroft younger
Bronowski, example,
prospect, generation
with a Exeter:
of
book
Cockcroft
his
Imprint
on
because son
to
Jacob
use evokes
Academic,
with
the
the Bronowski
his
a
notion
son 2011. . 130
CEU eTD Collection 1932 Laboratory Metropolitan responsibility right idiosyncrasies of becoming talks American
the
lines about experiment
second The
scientists a the
language
the
under pleasurable -
Vick photograph
with new
of bomb
his with Ernst
ers toy the
referred
use
children‘s as
in
Walton of benefits
Rutherford. d plaything a the
humanity.‖ in is: ―toy.‖
the early to ―Much
on
the
to new
PP The
the humanity. 1920s if
bomb
article,
He one toys:
of
b transmutation This omb,
Professor had
has until
as All is
in
only
as ―the
the Cockcroft an
his relation 1924,
well 50
exaggeration Fig.
correct
gadget,‖ been Cockcroft‘s wo
of as
when rking 4
to granted the nuclear
had teacher
the
Cockcroft‘s atom. he life
been
bomb
left that
leisure
is energy, some
to
In devoted
working
to
associates
lead
is discussion
work notion is also
photograph
affords
the spent
to
at interesting. for
project.
of steering
the post
in
an
with celebrity the
Cavendish correcting
industrial -
war
pr
with
The Lise
ospect on
While scientists‘
to his subtitle with
the
the firm of child
the the
CEU eTD Collection 134 133 132 131 Clark and rhetorical importance cotton ―…born newspaper supplying biography teenagers were documenting was ―humanly‖ A A discourse work is Mei
Cockcroft, success - barely great
bombs. CCA, CCA, Clark Ronald
tner, science, also
children
for renders
manufacturer…‖
way
goes CKFT CKFT
in
in
anyone over included the
Clark,
of by
gap the
Responsibility
managing in
106.
articles 1897, and to
on
science but to G
the 1959.
the
Cockcroft publisher her 24/3, 20/22, and ope science
overnment. to
Sir humanize ―normal‖
Cockcroft
lives left
extol lives
the
coming ned John in
young
Letter on Harwell
Archival Letter
for the at year
Cockcroft
described in Cockcroft
and of
Cock Cambridge
133
with
―humanity‖ by 1959
as 1959
adults famous by
and daily a
131 to of
and the
and croft Ronald also displaying representation
John
Cambridge Q docume photography
The
the
adapting ―Living ‘ humanities, by
ueen s educated
activities
(London:
gained (
stress in Cockcroft
―teenagers‖ and
British need C.P. Clark letter
the working
Victoria
would nts
gives
on to
a Snow‘s
books. Biographies‖ to to
a
discloses
Phoenix
a the
special
do in in
men
John dual — humanize to new
of
requests. which
1939, a
humanities a come
not Lise on
such ‘
). saccharine
science pre s
Cockcroft, research a education Journalist
The
debate. Diamond
51 nd House,
experimental suggest Meitner, personality, -
WWI no Cockcroft implied
as only women.
publisher
132
scientists
playing
complexities
series. and environment is
1959),
134
Clark later
26
non to
15 Cockcroft‘s
portrayal
— Ronald communication
Jubilee.
Not
October,
that represent October,
The
-
in These 10.
with specialised advises
an with
derives
physics,
hoped
only would ―pure Cockcroft
intended unusually
of
Clark
the
The
1959,
children.
of 1939, as
were ― was
Big
scientists
to
her contribution, science‖ him. Hiroshima to his also
son since
among
wrote inspire 2.
Science.
1. he gov
style dedicated to
sources public
was
arrive
Cockcroft good of
gifted
think Moreover, ernmental
all
people
a
Cockcroft‘s which
able
and
alongside ‖ children
Todmorden
have
See and for
and with
it from in
apart engineering.
to to through:
as
Clark,
the
both
broa
gave
Nagasaki
gone
was crucial bridge A
work. Cockcroft
book - and
from bombs.
d
classics
Sir
equal
to
for
there John
the
The
his
CEU eTD Collection 138 137 136 135 a wrote as expanding work ―science‖ Clark Cockcroft‘s of adults, Clark his book, the and a Cockcroft‘s education,
Cavendish certain 1948,
1948 Cockcroft
Clark, Clark, Anon. Clark, name
neighbouring confident
ethics
and points which on
Although
5. its
, in
Sir Sir Sir
charismatic “’ how
is
onto influence
Cockcroft Gowing a as post
John John John
automatically
and -
success image particular
out, was
trained taps well
of important
- future
war Cockcroft, Cockcroft, Cockcroft,
―whole the
himself,
―Harwell an countryside.‖ into
as
argue of of
has readership British effect has
physicist
a persona. the education a
tropes newspaper
stress
scientist
been human‖ found Atom
it
that
86. 88. 44. he associated
was hoped University.‖
industries.
- might
established ’ free, noticed,
Cockcroft
should talks ―The
its 135 for intended
and as appe
to
way rendering Perhaps
yet to scientists, not well
closer be
proper
Britain with
look al
although
efficient
into However, apparently a
137
were have chieved is
for by
Harwell.
Harwell, like: you
’ the
s Gowing‘
conduct
Clark‘s Clarke‘s of citizen
leading been a
most
52 get
his life desirable not ―Round
with
Cockcroft
’ suitable
s
to public
136 taken outlook. cited,
of and important book s in
the biography. governmental
newspaper rendering Cockcroft tomorrow, post -
that face
for heart model
in speeches. was
for -
war
will
scholarly Yet one d, his
the limited
claim of ” twinkling
for
of
influence The society. Clark
be had
The of rendering
technoscience… stereotypical
Cockcroft‘s
138
recruitable the equated scientific Daily
that successfully saccharine
work.
to (Fig.
gives successful
Cockcroft‘s - children Clark Mirror, eyed,
surpasses
of
5)
to Gowing‘s his
projects,
Cockcroft
Steven Harwell
generations
makes work notions
slow
29 own story
and
established,
farmers the December,
- that
. modesty, speaking view
Both young Shapin of
in greater
to portrayal as of
of
is his
adopt
early what
from of
in that
is
as
CEU eTD Collection 139 of have Labo3.2. charismatic Oppenheimer, the Chicago
Cockcroft‘s
Steven acknowledged
proposed In
my
Press, Shapin, r shortage Cockcroft and ―the magnet‖
leader pre
2008), the some function
vious T he
leader role was
Scientific
5. apparent discussion
of able
in
of
the
late
th Life to
personal, e
problems, lead 1950s
: wartime
A of
Moral
Margaret a
closely Britain.
the
History
Los but
familiar,
I Alamos guarded
Gowing‘s
Gowing think
of 53 Fig.
a
Late
she
and
5
laboratory, governmental
refers Modern
history
gives even
to
a the Vocation
the of remarkably
is
c British
harismatic.‖ potential a
project.
good
(Chicago:
nuclear
example
accurate
of
The 139 Cockcr
research,
Robert University
of
rendering
oft‘s how
J.
I
a of
CEU eTD Collection 143 142 141 140 in order eager disputed sense more the how nuclear Similarly, scientists ―Big anxieties. university (scientific) suggest Cockcroft‘s persona presented shown dedicated Federation
contrast
After Gowing, Shapin, Gowing, relationship
did
Science‖
to for Gowing to of
themselves
project Harwell, that
the to
continue du the
in
Cockcroft 141
to The
- and to
Cockcroft
like Independence Independence recruit
to of ty‖
labor this
left
the character Government education this Steven
British Scientific the the
states work. for community
and Cockcroft chapter ―Labour‖ job, between
was facilities
shortage. dangers
reluctant their people, British
Industries, alleviate
to Shapin
and
that in was The a
Life,
and
attract
and and part professional science
by
for was these
the nuclear
to
shape used tremendous of
prosperity. than acting
101. 140
personality
Deterrence, Deterrence
Oliphant‘s
would take of study gives
appointed
scientists British the 1965),
talent, Cockcroft,
and
the
were to
to
up and
and labor like
scientists
technology.
attract the an Government‘s scientific be
3.
careers,
of training implement Government his
II,
Amer
143
10. set Master a ―Tories,‖
growth September (as
giving shortage
greater magnet. 27.
persona
This
young up according
proposed or ican
at
are
at
at The
regardless
technological
is,
themselves Harwell
Churchill
of Harwell readily concern
.
54
perspective they and
his College I
of If
had
industrial
strategy
am and
1945
Cockcroft course,
representation to
reluctant by
were
to to rather
Cockcroft? Gowing, College
were
was
hand. Clark to than, of be letter,
careers
to
accommodate to
at
―national
shaped set highly
research
onto skeptical ‖
not wrong
address Harwell
for
See (University graduates and
was up which
once
reassured
very
in example, recruiting An
Gowing),
problematic a according 1958. for
ideals on.
the magnet
demanded duty.‖
the argues political; about because
that
Industry opportunities
of to ―
wide the Young
(e.g. Cambridge), British join military
purpose?
Nev talent
whether
for and
that
scientists‘ to
-
of
and felt
and although
people Communism). the a ertheless, expectations young
would
scientists their
lot
scientists for
Schools
professional
are British stockpile. already
What more this
solely post have
clearly
―strong
talent,
rather
leaning
is
(London:
- in
not
war
was
were
about
that
and 142
a
CEU eTD Collection 147 146 145 144 Government embo campaigns. the conflict military longer Similarly, scientists, gap friend strategy. to message portrayed that joining Money, 7 the (Indianapolis disaster
be
Cockcroft Shapin, Max I March,
period,
already
will money British
died humane The -
relations,
based
Weber,
the - discuss
between Gowing
146 and industrial of
1966.
The
in personalization but early
scientists
―
as team
It modern was The brain was
how widely
a
had
and on
Scientific
would dominant ―
but also romant
this Science
concerned
as
- little particularly
problem personal,
such
Cambridge: because drain asserts, science
to
also more
1918 establishments for
felt
work science
were media play ‖
ic, Life, as as
the had to in
across
that a
in
the yet over
the was
the
a of of
Vocation onto
against also 109. public freedom coverage nd of
to Max Hackett
U.S. done scientific financial n ones promisingly
a it
British British ext provide never industry
strategy becoming both needed proving
See chapter Weber‘s .
‖ paradigms fostered without . In
Publishing
has -
in A
scientific loving continents. of CCA,
Britain,
nuclear
The
more
benefit,
been
an
vocations
to in importance
to which that
Vocation assurance
be the CKFT aware modern
attract acclaimed
corrupting afforded in research
publicly
education science Company, addressed
science on analyses post the the
although
17/6, 55
Scientific
of
post
and public the university Lectures
-
scientific
war
to to ch
for
atmosphere,
was
Letter
- this active reluctant and the lecture
the was war anging 2004), t one‘s
he
period. and
a
Shapin was Government apparent
his
,
still diminishing creative
scientists
ed. at science. from ―vocation‖
scientist, personal
stressed 1
moral
system. way.
the
Science aloof -
David scientific conducted 31.
scientists. It F.
claims catastrophe
core
became A.
but
His
scientific
or from Owen
According ‘
papers at s Vick
in
This
treatment as like rather of
―vocation.‖
persona of Harwell. was
Harwell‘s differently. organizations.
a Governmental
the and (Harwell) 144 under
individual
the testify Bronowski, seeks Vocation .
changing
Cockcroft in Tracy workings environment.
dominant of
to dehumanizing
was
mentorship to
They the to
research
to B. his publicity Cockcroft
a
Windscale
. to Shapin
Cockcroft lleviate agency 147 Strong
concern for
were
transmit
of invoked It
had
The trope
the was science.
145
to attests
not
and
were over the
(CC),
had
no of be
the
the
CEU eTD Collection 150 149 148 become participate impression. no photograph 1949 interesting government unive The was American mending recruitment v conduced iew 384 of 1949.
Margaret John Anon. different
Supply, first aimed
-
of rsities 390. recruitment The scientific from To The
Cockcroft,
scientists , active
strategy A.E.R.E: assist the
by brochure brochure
research.
1949), res in at Mead the
of needs and The from
in
shattered
anthropologist recruiting the earch
Harwell
participants. universities the in environment
in
and
project,
A.E.R.E: Foreword.
The
creation was a brochure
the was
of post the
small 149
begins from Rhoda environment‖
Atomic
industry,
solution
to very governmental It image.
- is war young
brings
The eas
as
1949
British
a M of
by many Energy begins
total negative
Cockcroft‘s
é
The e environment?
Margaret Atomic British in traux
the
introducing
of
as scientists
is which a
presentation shot
town. the
, described the common fresh young Research
“
with that Energy Image
nuclear
and many
or first of
Mead to
surpassed twist
There
a
commercial the foreword,
graduates.
much of work immoral;
personalized Research
of
Establishment,
the
According tensions problems
the
by
living
energy. such to with
of
is
importance
Scientist
and Shapin. 56 needed the
a differe
anything
instanc American certain Establishment,
148
quarters,
is depersonalized develop
Those
between
sector
The
posed molded
it
to among
note to
nt Mead Harwell, was
Cockcroft
es
brochure cozy work branches
of of
s capable
.
by in
your taken written
threatening
High
high
What scientific
you research so advised
Britain,
atomic atmosphere Harwell, B at
as
erkshire -
scientific
School
who school the from
expects
did newspaper to
of at and by
newly invite
a research for
at
energy, come a it Cockcroft: roles
Berkshire
, the
university Students, the
to decade London: Harwell. mean students
a
shatter
life. the in airplane wider
campaigns,
young established carried will
this
ads
we graduates to 150 climax ,
”
before Ministry
(London:
Science
find
work
. campaign
in The first need the
level. graduates The
— out 1957,
a
es
first
Mead‘s it
for
to brochure good ―an
30
of at
Harwell.
The Ministry
in to looks
recruit Supply,
(1957):
their the
the
on
to
CEU eTD Collection 155 154 153 152 151 the this would matter particularly international documents Harwell. scientists. Harwell. Establishment‘s providing Bethe, visiting Furthermore, developments. beneficial universities. brochure‘s Supply, dominant
Anon., Anon., TNA, TNA, The
g document, overnment. In
photograph be of Max
lectures
FO F 1950
1949),
A.E.R.E A.E.R.E: The On O
fact, 153
better trope, both for
,
conclusion
371/88532, 371/88532,
however t
Born
The hose one If
control
the light the
John
13. Cockcroft
Harwell a John ease still
,
left
and
cozy
has If child 14.
The s
brochure brochure establishment and in uch -
invoked that hearted
Cockcroft
unsaid already
of the . Cockcroft ―big Atomic of
UP UP
atmosphere
so photograph, is by
access
is a was
United
233/53, 233/53, tomic living on.
was names‖ the extolling
when
been reassures invokes Energy optimism at
152 also
case,
the first
to was
energy. mentioned Housin stressed in representing
Letter Letter States.
because
research
active
present
Research in
such by
to to
why Cockcroft‘s an Harwell's
the
young
from from approach bringing deliver of
interwar
g
The The an
at
that
did scientific field and in it
time.‖
and John Roger
organizing Establishment, atmosphere,
exemplary keeps this
graduates g
question the
he entertainment overnment a
of commitment
recreational
Cockcroft chapter
forth lecture
57 Roger is Makins international
155 individual ten nuclear
the
talking freedom
- From
year scientists. photographs
scientists
was and
confe
Makins that to at
Harwell, to then
-
physics
re John it
the old
the Roger as a
- their is
facilities. and
is drafted to rences pressing is
an it
important
University official son
appeal Cockcroft,
complicated
also acade asking
must
up governmental
Makins, Berkshir indiv research
such
is of
to
and referred
Cockcroft‘s leisurely
mic
be scientists
to idual one
Gowing date g
to
if as overnmental
e 11 13 scientific
the safe
notice
, there of
co
(London: Edward
for and
May May with
and -
by discipline Oxfo
to operation to
nuclear
posing
how
publication is
refers coincide 1950. 1950. the be
working
live not new
speech. anything rd
meetings.
at
Ministry Teller, this arch
on
on
and
a
minutes
to with
scientists, image
high by
with behalf ival
the in work at 154
citing Hans
of
―that the is the
level, As 151
was
of
of at
a
the
CEU eTD Collection 159 158 157 156 achieve cou behind get careers. (whose Everybody address. communicate decisions. Bronowski fields 1958, On testifies although correspondence? Power, secretary), used
― TNA, TNA, John ld another across: The
On in visualise and Cockcroft
the Cockcroft, ‖ 158
Chairman
career
157 publicity it.‖ AB AB that
Lecture h another
to
The e . (Fig.
21 atomic
―The
159 was
occasion, 16/2066, 27/18, ―Catch
is
the communicate
February,
the
choices advised
scientist‘s
what
on
writing for
6)
g feels
key already ―
Why ― instance, overnment findings Catch
25 The energy
A propaganda.
our ―
Careers
that only to March, ne
Cockcroft
1958.
Contribution
are
is to
our
scientists advancement wspaper at
the remarked
Cockcroft
stress role
programme they supposedly the
scientists with
their
Co
for last 1958,
was ‖
ckcroft time, is
Young
See knew
paragraph his the
findings
addressed creative
ad 5.
young!‖ and interested
TNA,
young!
on
individualistic public. for Cockcroft pressed
People,
Responsibilities to
in
would the is influenced
Harwell
be AB
might science
the
‖ in
with
need
Everybody is
possible The ‖ students
27/18,
the
and to
imagination 1957, the write
be
the argues
report
58 of
production
government
a summarizes and title controlled
Letter
little
by 1.
scientists public approach
for of
,
and
at
20 technology
their of
the on
that dangerous,
an
a from October,
the
who conference
. Scientist every
of 156 obscure,
parents) scient
of
the article
A.K.
the to to also However,
the had
knowledge
be 1956, of
the image
scientists since
Rawlinson
ists to
is points
heavily the his properly
that housewife the issue? inspiration. to
at 19. do
there
courage public consider Develo
and
Reading
urges
similarly,
not Cockcroft
censored is and
The to and words
educated some make
pment J.M.
appearances,
- younger
targeted and engineers in lat
engineering
The
University.
Pye risk
finding ter
of
to
political of
tenacity
was this
inspiration Cockcroft. (Cockcroft what Nuclear
that example on
people
weekly trying
it both
who ways
could
to
In
‘
to s
to
be
CEU eTD Collection 160 is and ads the memoir education apply competition position
Worcestershire: go
John
book and feature ing
to On
Sandalls.
media. does to
at Harwell is
the while
Harwell,
address good films
was
not contrary,
Perfect Sandalls Thirty
working
high. for adhere because influence
this
dreading - givin
six Image,
Before
to question.
years saw to
for g of Cockcroft‘s
be young
a
2004),
its
Harwell an at glimpse
that
Harwell, historically
the
prospect advertisement
2. he graduates‘ Atomi
might
at
into claims
c: Sandalls the
to
My
reliable how
Fig.
encourage never same
time
views on
in 59
6 1950s
worked labor at
the time.
be methods
AERE
of
chosen News
―youngsters‖ young sh British 160
Harwell, for ortage,
Although
Chronicle (nor
the for
graduates
nuclear
the rubber
was John 1958
position were Sandall‘s
that -
.
1994 Sandalls
science? B
industry, to ut
Sandall
recruited
continue
(Evesham, how
since
self
applied
The did
but ‘ s
- the
published
—
ambition), their newsreels next
chose
through
for
section
a to
CEU eTD Collection the no Cockcroft right then shot 45 (successfully, gently nuclear power. or These grass research. The 3.3. Cockcroft onfilm ganic ).
one middle,
newsreel However,
actually juxtaposed - i In fed. n
few
invokes
is
Indeed, the
weapon. British 1948,
The left
The is shots
middle discussing
that
showing
unexamined.
opens first
since
British narrator
the the at countryside
with
are Second, of
this
shots shot national of
him British very with
a
the time, Movietone
Harwell
matters montage tells is
later showing
intelligently newsreel, triumphant the a
A
strategic panorama importance
invokes the of
fact refer shot
at
the is British
of
― taken his that
news
after the
location to
airplane
equating
a
bombing
pass music
the
sense Harwell of nerve used
public from is of produced
typical secrecy
that to the
of to
magnifying shots of
center the Harwell a
project, had refer Harwell
added of moving serenity was 60
south
security
Cockcroft
and
British
of no ‖
built to
of the
considerable
idea ―
to many
particularly
British
barbed
and Harwell. car, and
the establishment. his
on
guard Progress
that
that
alongside
the talking importance the presence. things.
- countryside,
wire Britain
pleasurable to site it
(Fig.
was
which
blows in
in ‖
to of First,
aspect
relation
Atomic
a
7 other The once was a
) Cockcroft barbed
of
previous
the to
the
British first set
with
Germany aspects a of scientists,
narrator
Energy military peaceful to
to Harwell.
wire, shot
cows defending
produce
RAF is scientific
of
showing introduced
which
Research. states
in
being base. atomic he
and base
The 1944
is its
itself
that
is in
first first
-
CEU eTD Collection science. discuss note inside village: shown newsreels, outline only ― The represent homely
newsreel how one However,
Later work
just
the this
the ‖
identified
a the British
would
development months
few,
camera particular of shots
representation is
the
following important impersonalized
environment. change
dissolve scientists.
after and refuses
newsreel
shown
the and
conside
the in
into to
Fuchs of
potential In revealing
portray
Fuchs
through science
talking Cockcroft in
this ― rably. white
more case,
newsreel,
case,
prior of
and about the multiple
The lab
depth invokes
British
is Harwell
location scientists footage coat
Secrets then
the
Cockcroft in 61 ‖
Fig.
shots.
nuclear
how the actual scientists
(again) ‘
of s of
of
next 7 public was
Harwell
its Harwell Harwell Technology
technology
science.
is
surroundings, equated chapter affected
working not
image,
has , and depicted,
a
dev
with British
by changed
relating as comes of
on
oted
the
depicted Harwell.
Harwell
radioactive rather
but Fuchs Movietone
to in
the it
it the
the
to focusing
is
also landscape The by case.
a
spaces end, important
pleasant
being isotopes.
on shots
newsreel
I as
will
on of
to the
of
the and
to
the
CEU eTD Collection 164 163 162 161 scientific prize thus cause Blackett bombs. Civil publishing only B that rays. 1951 have It Fortunately, the
lackett Following Basingstoke: would
Mary TNA, See Anon. shaky
under
easily
British influenced Blackett
was British Defence How
for Matthew
Deterrence, Jo , ‘
AB
was be
s Atomic
the brilliance,
image in
Nye,
no case the a molded
was 6/990,
interesting
scientist
fact Cockcroft
foreword scien Palgrave
Government the
circumstances War,
would
Grant, efforts, “
reminds Attack: A Cockcroft
the of not
only
Harwel Physicist ” tist
Physics by
―
Blackett choice
After
apart
a
Macmillan, that cause
against
163
Pa
British Can schizophrenic just
a
to received l
us trick pamphlet
Bulletins Blackett the
much
in investigate ‘
from
in Britain in
s stressing
of of
much
the
Bomb: image Perspective
should
the
painting argued,
Blackett scientist the
Cockcroft
2010).
Corridors used it
a Be effort. (1951)
being special headache
stated Civil Nobel on
impacted
Defended?
Britain
the
(in
scientist was how
the
the
who received 1 Defence 161
of
put importance
the (1999): that
as Prize
concerns dangers
picture not Power: Blackett the
the was develop to on press
it by
(London: ‖
the
Fuchs the and
display was for 137. 62 such
following
the
at the P.M.S.
black best
and of
Nuclear British
physics the
a gained
very Nobel
Fuchs of
nd nuclear as atomic case‘s
Association
newsreels) option
time
his Blackett in Fuchs problems or
unlikely
War Harwell Government
year‘s
white. Nobel Prize case? much in
very damage
energy. weapons.
, for 1951, in
’ s as
Opposition
Britain,
of
in
Nobel vocal
What British
prominence Prize depicted Cockcroft that as that ‘
Scientific s 1948
162 jointly to Library. an
the
Britain
Mary Harwell
1945 against
for Co was work indicator Prizewinner.
policy for
to Nobel
ntrary
by his
Workers, - with
‘ his
68 Atomic
s his . 164 Jo
It in the would
image
undivided (Houndmills,
the - ‘
role
making. Nye seems s
work
Ernest the
laureate to
of image British
bomb
Weapons
the 1950). in Cockcroft
press
argues was survive Before on
mending that
British Walton.
might
and
cosmic press? belief might
not
by
this
that
A the
‘
-
s
CEU eTD Collection 166 165 establishing Koepler, To said relation saccharine Mitchell European narrative Mitchell space the Dr. Vanessa culture Dr. international rockets 3.4 their which Fiction female Universities
― Historian . Cockcroft Koepler asProfessor in
what scientists. Crenshaw Stephen We
about
Professor later rocket‘s
…
will
of
into characters to
Films
extent seduces
and sacrifices t becomes require
he character, science years.
the the them sub Bonnie
and space Mitchell, the
fictional
scientist following
(Jefferson,
Dr.
is representation juxtaposition - fuel
‖
plot
is good to Koepler Colleges
fact
See
a were
an
Noonan
the Mitchell recruit
and
Soviet and
even himself tank,
might
John already group that perhaps
often film
director, help
wh
bored establishing NC:
him of , physicists
more
Cockcroft, orbiting wrote John an o
spy,
leaders Technology portrayed
referring
dominate
McFarland, him is is and
o on older antagonistic
of
roughly of
accused f married
complicated
leave
an
Cockcroft
Dr. molded the
boards living in
British
in acclaimed who
the
British ― the
their
as Lisa First first
the
to the (London:
a
are progressive. 2006). Earth.
m
project. of to in more
the
early another first Spaceways
on
Session, odeled
science human Frank Establishment
good
an heavily murdering
is scientist,
scienti
book work
the
with
used unhappy thirties satellite. In gender
The experimentalists,
public The
and
on
order on 15
63 space mission
in See
environment
the
st Institute and guarded
1950s
November
and Lise
this is Vanessa Dr. main (1953, UK) -
Bonnie based mathematician the
to
leading British The represented image
rocket good
film? Phillip
SF in Meitner?)
disprov
couple
to of protagonist
scientific Government secrecy,
cinema
Noonan, study Physics, organizers Space.
1956,
and
Mitchell. of
to housewife. How
an at
Crenshaw
John
e bring and
we
‖ Harwell? international
in of the
The as
falling
1956), The
Women
does also
which which
the
stuffing Dr.
quarters, of
the Cockcroft?
British is
back Education 166
projects
need
melodramatic
an film, and
the Lisa
4. exemplary she . Not However,
Scientists
in
causes
The
American How
evidence.
those
compound a
ar love
their Intelligence
particularly
Frank understanding
Mitchell‘s team gues or project
couple, of
is larger human
By Physicists with an
bodies in that Professor
of what (a
British Fifties alarm already
165
scientist,
and groups
of the
Central Dr.
qualities because function?
The
sending
wife can genre into service,
in
in Science among
in
the love
be
a ‘
s
-
CEU eTD Collection 167 Harwell.‖ radiochemical also troubles younger The ―the St. character their and Cockcroft international ―There Government and military motivating scientist
CCA, John‘s
women loving older
related good science Second, Professor
are
CKFT official to with generations
in 167
and old College seem
many towards Professor
workers,
himself working the
to well co
both
days‖ 25/24, experienced Cockcroft laboratory
- proceed
Koepler‘s film to who operation,
nationalities
and
(University share vast
his
Speech
as
of
how referred and at Koepler is
have
the
univer team.
the responsible scientific
with
certain
and bring Cockcroft does
first
given paternal
normal scientist Establishment. worked
scientific Professor to Upon sity
over
among
of this rapid appearance
on as similarities.
- knowledge Cambridge)
based
the
―the
in
a representation
figure
having for
in is
referred late
scientific
opening interwar us,
brought an
research, budgeting Koepler Professor,‖
- research
but
even acclaimed at
This in gained
Harwell.
of First, to
and yet the
ing
as
scientific progress. out
64 the
himself
implies
are
the we
a
film a
done
the conversation.
tap Radiochemical
the they of professor particular
while
kind, university are Professor
duty
Establishment. into In needed is
under
are
as
a a circles. when a Dr.
Cockcroft‘s helpful high
single
speech Professor ―the for
both
Lisa
of
the talent
economic
science
he begins
level
setting. Laborato father
natural
(Fig. The ―older
team.‖
mentorship
Frank and is on
for
introducing
of Koepler‘s
fictionalized
the
T
8
paternal. of a and pre
he ) ry
Koepler experience.
philosophy. recruiting and
speech
This
even Incidentally, support the opening at
- Professor
war nation
Harwell,
wiser‖
family
invokes of confesses
position film by They
is a
the from
of to
gre
and and the
remarking:
than 1.
They
at is team persona? educate Harwell‘s
at
re
a
Cockcroft
only the playful the
-
sense
scientist. was her evoke the
know
to ―real‖
love men
at a the
of
-
CEU eTD Collection 168 ―scientific Polanyi overlook national understand ―communism‖ respect. the suitable
Merton, atmosphere At Both
and The working interests.
last, the
The
community‖
Professor and
Bronowski
mission
project
both Normative
of respect established
conditions
the
Even Dr.
is
goes Koepler scientific
Koepler
represented Structure
authority the – saw
a terribly
in term Governmental
and Spaceways
both and
and staff of
character. Polanyi
and Science
Cockcroft wrong
fictionaliz as Cockcroft
that
are a
, likeab ,
they saves 273 represented coined in
figure Their
the -
274. are
ed
le would
are 65 the
end,
Fig. character and in
acclaimed style in
fully
mission. 1943.
the
but real
have 8 as
of
co
film,
working
it
Harwell ―command‖
-
supportive undoubtedly is operative
168 for
the a
military giving
love for
is
that wit the
of
and
is their
supported officer
h
post Government not of
the Mertonian
companionship Establishments
authoritative -
war Government.
who
science. the
is -
like
exemplary and advised
and If
They and
to
CEU eTD Collection on representations representation exemplary Second, program, persona suggest
post Cockcroft -
two war to manifold
Cockcroft‘s
Harwell. British
important British
of
and
was
post
representations nuclear
environment problematize If
constructed
-
image
war the aspects.
latter scientist. science
was
First,
research
.
across
constructed
the of
in
My
Cockcroft
Cockcroft‘s contested Spaceways
different arguments
establishment
as
66 suggest danger
to .
British
image In
stand can
the
nuclear be was
that
next
was
for media
tested
he the
the
persistently chapter,
science was
and marker whole
through
constructed th
I ese
British was depart of
molded an
representations British
threatening
interesting
from nuclear
as
as nuclear
the
positive to
project. relate
to
infl
his ict
CEU eTD Collection 170 169 project: asks his giving 4.1. British SF ―creature
Anon. Henri secluded CHAPTER IV.
the ―
us Tomorrow
, ― Lefebvre, senior
“ Try no 3
Hamlets
research
more and
scientist.
Production
justify
you
money, in
Harwell University: Representing an “intimate” an University:militaryHarwell Representing Plutonia,
establishment
might
- Quatermass this
features‖:―Big Screeningthethreat British of Science‖ on ‖
of
exclaims
” Space to not
The
a
have
committee Daily
( Oxford,
in
complex, 1946
walks Dr.
a Mirror, rural
job.
Bernard
England:
into
Britain. In of
10
67 fact, and really theBritainoftomorrow begins. the contrast you When ge society. Social space for as theanalysis atool works of the village thatdisappeared? You debris? allWhat‘s this thi think beneath shadow. its withchickenswindmill, scratching about the other side about the inside 8ft.highwire fences. Andon Itgasfactory. guardedby is police town, a hotted Whitehall
On the right March, a
room Quatermass Blackwell,
no ― – No
1961 1949,
169
one with
more
bureaucr
Marsh,
between the Britain of yesterdayBritainbetween theof of 1991 2. -
t just beyond thefork beyond inthe road,t just
hand side of thehand road side of istheatom a of the road is acenturiesroadof the
- The DailyMirror
us up version ofa poison up version wartime upon model money? ),
may 34. ats! Quatermass II Quatermass 170
returning
of have ‖
Didn
(Fig. his Henri LefebvreHenri
jobs lunar
‘
9) t from
you
… article, 1949
-
invasion (UK, 1957) (UK, indu
roaming They explain? Lon s could be nature - old strial don ‘ re
‖ to
CEU eTD Collection 171 epigraph supposed come Lab. to sides
The
the
‖ Quatermass Quatermass
true,
of film See many
the ‘
s meteorites
‘ Daniel
s is quotation,
Atlantic, who imagery
disrupted
even J. ‘
and Keyles,
― rather of
pity
after fell.
the radar
junior
by
party, than
that The two Instead
unusual tech
time Physicists, with scientist
scientists
nology ‖
resembling
never the of
occurrences
finding explosion invokes
Marsh joined 307.
discover
a the an Polanyi
of notion go
68 Manhattan
old A registered Fig. on Fig.
- a
bombs.
full
British that a
‘
10
s 9 trip
- and WWII
scale
― Project
To to
by village, Bronowski
investigate most
was copy the ,
physics
actually
American radar.
of with
Quatermass ‘
in s
171
the won Marsh
― World
scientific physicists
(Fig.
place by
radar War remarking
10)
‘ where
before lunar
II
nightmare work
meant
on 1943, project.
the
the both
Rad ‖ and
CEU eTD Collection 173 172 nuclear disaster vicinity. He interview Kneale, British project. (Fig Nigel
Arthur Paul is .
11) not SF
Kneale, Wells,
environment
weapons The in the
Coincidentally,
Vincent, film The
interested for
the
series
alien
“
”
the British
Apocalypse
Quatermass world in
British
“ Picture meant Nigel
lunar creator
in .
— government,
the Kneale: Science
project that the
Then!:
the
Post
and
drama is
Windscale
it
film often
The ,
Fiction
screenwriter, the
was
Kneale is
of
was Ultimate Human not
infiltrated quoted no
the
Cinema
only in
longer
argues
accident. galaxies
Core British
Monstrosity
as threatening ,
explained ed.
of by one possible
for
69 Science I.Q.
Fig.
cinemas
aliens, afar, Historian
of
a
Hunter
more
and finest 11
but
Fiction,
to his scientific
had Strange
see
at ― (London:
rather
particular
homely examples
Jodi
the stolen
” the
Picture
Things
time
Burkett
in planet research
Routledge,
‖
Quatermass what
approach
vision of
Post of on
the
as
1950s the
argued: is ,
26 communities a
happening Coast first
of 1999),
discrete
November,
to the SF ‘
nuclear …
scie ― SF
The 4 genre. genre. an 8. ‘
ntific s
interview entity
setting.
power in 1955,
reactor but
172
the In
Nigel an 62. also
with of 173
CEU eTD Collection 176 175 174 the Windscale philosophical ― awareness their Nature Macnaghten, weapons), are in energy However, nature. employment Windscale views age separate signs, ag
nature,
Phil Hannah Jodi
also chapter e,‖ and
study
On Philosopher
on
The
Macnaghten Burkett, is is sense She
the able from
8 nature culturally not
now Arendt,
British nuclear
thus
does ‘ accident accident. to
October writes s British
to of
epigraph),
of an in
post
and people
―The in
nature control nu
not 2000 agency
Journal and artifact The
possession
and
- sociological clear energy Hannah
on war Campaign
Campaign
stem constructed;
1957, and
Promise nuclear
John and how book
becomes
British
histor for ,
science. and
caused SF
built
from Urry. is the
a the the
Arendt
Contested
renderings of
reactor for novel particular
weapons.
of
y
decisions History
by
Politics
human
for
― Contested environmental of
renderings Nuclear
humans. radiation contested
just
hence,
humans,
certain
Nuc in noticed
fire
another of
that (New
ability
Natures lear Disarmament
timings. Science I
of
of
Natures at there 175 argue
cultures
hazard humans
nuclearity natures,
politicians. York: which the of the
Disarmament Since
object
to
nature
45 are
catastrophes, Bri
problem
that ‖ argue (London:
70
destroy
Schocken 176
(2012):
to
can
tish multiple
human
‖ (that are and
this
Ordinary of the
arguing
during
rather
for
be
‖ for Windscale changing history.
174
626.
local can might Sage of predates
easily Books:
a
beings the (
Burkett
nuclearity CND flexible
natures.
than
the be
but Publications, that
population Britons firs
be attitudes
Sociologists wiped
dismantled. New 1950s,
)
rather
CND
t
are environmentalism the more that plutonium
time attests
understanding
Urry
York,
able
post
on have out
altered ‘
towards
s from particularly the imitating
2000),
criticism
modern and
and - 2007), to that by Hiroshima
work ―
It John
felt control
the
factory
thermonuclear workers. Macnaghten the
the 3. it is
‖ 155.
was mediation
a
Earth
of conceptions British nature. these
Urry
over force, of
during
the
nature, and
(described
the
―
horror. in
Nature.
In
and domestic 1957
the
green nuclear
present public Nuclear a
the limit of
Phil nuclear
they
‖ of -
‘
in s
CEU eTD Collection 182 181 180 179 178 177 dedicated database, were continue school paranoia, job mediation was in On Dwight and matter solutions. understanding the Authorities speech 85. accessed
the
Lorna Anon. CCA, British TNA, Anon.
the matter of
the
a
also
matter world,
tackling
was in
other that
British
Eisenhower , , CKF EG Arnold,
182 the Universities ― ―
on 178 the the
scarce Windsc BEPO to of with
delicate
1/96, recapitulates
chairman
23
dedicated T
the
Lord
pub hand, of the Calder vicinity documents
25/24,
nucle April
concerns.
Prime Windscale
the
urgency passes
Windscale October ale: lic in problems
Plowden
the
public.
their 2015. discussion Film since
Speech ‗ ar on Hall, Nobody
paint Lord ‗ Minister,
Windscale to reactors, nuclear
the 1957.
and
to
portrayal 1957: of British
cataloging Altho
nuclear
had 177
at
and
let Edwin a day ‘ accident. lavish made Video
s
Dinner
somewhat In Health
An
the been
of project
ugh their
‘
of Harold
for
fact, nuclear test,
Anatomy
Council, the co
sure
accident the compensations
of Pl
to
the which
Affected inaugurated
‖ - all stress
owden,
operation
Lord the Windscale Windscale
The
accident, could
that
Government
Macmillan newsreel divergent
science
disaster.
Manchester ― of
Plowden,
News they
of the ‘ pass
, a
‖ Cockcroft not
Nuclear nuclear The
media
71 with
had on
pressing
with in
was accident. be and
productions,
Manchester
For that picture. Screen, 2.
had
Britain
previously halted Guardian,
American
sought
Accident
- bids
crucial little
and bomb
example, were
written praises
‖ (again)
181 goodbye
http://bufvc.ac.uk/newsons the
Incidentally, since media j
ust
to Guardian later
testing,
for (London:
17 The public
only
minimize nuclear only a a Plowden
March,
in
British the
on letter year
paid attention. government
the
to
a
the
first adapted , the
would
Palgrave
single 9
before Atomic
to 1958, ―
to November,
authorities
Film issue the nuclear ‘ Government
s the the nuclear the
diplomacy
newsreel 1. By not
new
effects farmers instrumental on Windscale. U.S. Macmillian,
of
Energy was
looking
be scientists co screen sreel
creen/search/ 1957, power
Presi
was - panicked reluctant
operation. and
and
companies did
is
in 5.
‖
expected dent
at
2007), station 180 Internet tackling
a girl
in CND
good It
.
,
to s The
179
84
‘
-
s
CEU eTD Collection 186 185 184 183 probable renderings Chernobyl, asks. miners. October accidents Government retir recommended However, good opened Furthermore, had accident Plutopia: workers counter reminds Windscale case, Windscale UK:
Since TNA, Anon. Arnold,
ed worked 185
candidate Oxford Historian the
Plowden,
debates
- Why However, , Arnold
AB
with part.
thirty to one
―Macmillan panic. lack
that Windscale Nuclear during
monstrous, were the of
rather 48/1156,
on University ‘
of
In
s thereof). did
no she the
perils
happened - was
her the
efforts
odd
Plutopia
classified tested for of on Lord
death
to
Windscale Families, Windscale an
served story
than not
the science former ,
post
of an years Letter ordered xxi. give
early
charges
for
S
Plowden
employed radiation
Press,
to media ee
official ,
historian toll,
the -
Brown
radiation.
Windscale
in tackle Arnold, a
as
from
after. pape
Atomic
assistant
meeting,
―
Lorna Windscale
Windscale 184
Britain 2013), more an Tory
gain event attention
and
argues K.
followed account ‘ rs Kate in assistant
s radioactivity. Arnold Windscale
Cities, MP,‖ J. Rather
studying
papers at
employed Arnold 67 credible so
Russell
around
tell Brown
the Lorna - Britain.
Gowing that
68. censorship,‖ much
The
and accident.
seems
than of a
Ministry
was
the by to
at leukemia
,
story
to would Guardian told
the xii. ‖
Arnold. the similar
the Margaret CCA authorities,
media testing a
A.W. and This ―
regarded
mining
I an Great of accident. to Arnold
am, same of
The 72
186 the
favorable
insider have write
Hills, of testify methods cases, led
a all
, attention for 183
2 Han
Soviet The much Times Supply,
workers,
January,
time:
Gowing. accident knowingly the
one,
Arnold
introduces
been 28
a herself ford she
‖
Gowing scarcity to
much
,
August of and
1980s - to very 1
orchestrated
reported account first
his
plutonium
testing
January,
inspired
and the
in the 1988, American
agreed
critical
- physically
inte in The
praised of charge
the authorities 1986,
British
British
the
of became
Ayrshire,
the the against 12. only rest
1988, of Windscale newsreels 1986
miners plant, about radiation
by 1.
book and
Plutonium
the immediate
of
in
book
campaign nuclear government
the
radiation.
1;
Chernobyl handpicked
the coordinating nuclear was Windscale unfit the accident
Anon.
by
which events almost
threats, on way obvious
and
instructed, comparing
accid
to Disasters
program deaths the
―Cover See
the
energy.
work
to
killed
newspaper
‘ after
and
none, s exposed people.
Windscale
workers ent Kat to ease accident American
choice. (or,
-
a
consider
the up
e and (Oxford, in
media 17
Brown, since
Arnold
in by the two
of This
their
at this
fire
now
she
at a
CEU eTD Collection 189 188 187 Behemoth, Q countryside British were spatiality. Britain. organizations, until Windscale cleaning environment. credit CND decades. the government, efforts in campaign uatermass
a
BL, Peter CCA, only foreword
the the
campaigners. The Although
to
YD.2012.a.271,
to
1950s
Henessy,
However,
PLDN -
existing the radioactivity
only The up minimize
for Furthermore, importance
plutonium the
by efforts, Government and
by
same
the As public to
m
5/1/5, like
Sea
rapid
CND forward
edia the
Arnold
the a newsreel), newly
British
matter
the Monster
(a
Letter radiation employment
in
accident, Campaign to renderings
industrialization nd
was producing had
of
one CND
to become
‘
Quatermass acquired,
only) s
Quatermass
‘ from Windscale
s of 1950s book established died
of
responsibilities
, (UK, made
fact,
did
threat
for the Warren
British newsreel
away
revokes acquainted
of
Nuclear SF
factory not
of
campaign
CND 1959).
post
sure 1957, a
by signs
cinema
Newman ― … understand and
cinemas domestic lies mere
and -
getting
that
Chernobyl,
even
by Similar Disarmament, rendering … seeing
In
other
(milk
in Lorna nuclear the
‘
and with these months the
addressed s
its to praised
pamphlets:
authorities
rid screened
Lord ‖
73 SF
a
film, portrayal the being action Arnold,
possible the nuclear
particular
attitudes
of of establishments.
films
public changes Plowden,
after
―Fall
threat
milk the London the
spilt
these should vii
an
produced
Government
catastrophe. accident
Out,‖ the .
of ― ‘ scenarios stopped
from
s
At were nuclear
and obscure
newsreel
20 interest. nuclear nuclear issues accident,
is
the
be 1962, April,
farms surrounding
attacked to
taken
time
undoubtedly
the
around
In be science
at 3.
threatening
but 187 1990, and science
showing
1959, These the taken ― sale
in
it
of
untouched again. Historian important
non their failed
through
time the 1.
the
of was
two
care films - farms. had
nuclear accident milk
‖
Windscale Windscale
the 189 of
to
influenced able
British
years
br of,
the Peter the
‖ give Important
film government allowed from
ought 188 for
as to
accident. Thames post
The after at
proper three shown — inflict Henessy,
this
the disaster on -
war the the
civil area the
on by
in ‘ s
CEU eTD Collection 190 transform their Nature, prehistoric turns nuclear made Pacific a
prehistoric 1957,
Many
mark,
against
sure
In
urging
Ocean
program once British
Behemoth ed
that
mons is
nature)
them monster.
humankind a now
and organizations static the , ter
to atomic
travels threatening Windscale ,
stop
is threatens nature component
important (Fig.
the
tests and
to
(from
planned
is 12)
London
takes
an
accident to in to
religious The
object demolish for Australia of become
thermonuclear
its human
problematiz old
through
revenge
would that
authorities nature
completely
Western caused history,
has
water. not
tests on 74 was
Fig. agency, ing
to
cause ― concern
in
workers Big a
civilization
revived
the 12
Although
background 1957 transformed.
science
relationship much similarly
.
See councils) to
due
the
TNA,
damage Plowden ‖
through
to
and
British
upon to
wrote the
The FO
to what its
nuclear 371/129241
to
history which
monster wrongdoing.
letters shots and public.
the Arendt
the
Br
to
of
humans tests in
190 itish
the
authorities (a , wreck
the 1957. remarked.
Government marker
in
domestic
ato
The
the
have
and mic
of
left age. It
in
CEU eTD Collection 193 192 191 historic energy, harnessing world scientific is application started cause Department. examination ― resulted and shipping whether sea. out the monster havoc the
1954. Manchester tackled
John TNA, TNA,
beast. 191 an
radiation Lucky
danger
stands
of
article Moreover,
screen
Davy,
in
monster, AB FO in
atomic came
routes the
progress.
Around by
the
the
of 371/129241,
of Dragon 6/1275, Guardian
193
Big of
―
vigorous as
to ing that
had
Scientists universal
1950s science from Japanese
A radioacti and a tests the
Ben
but
in
guarantor its notion refers there
the Healt
‖
On
urban British water. food ,
British origin incident were
the 22
and time
of Clash
Z commitment
one h
were
forces
November,
ship
to E112/120, ve
Physics
invigorated
that tackling production
the population
to
Water,
the
of
threats hand, cinemas. in
on for context,
―
important be a
were Behemoth Tower
early Lucky Atomic threatens contested
threat the
correspondence carried
2 Calder
1959, the
a
at
- so progress
American
of life
10
in
monster Bridge. is In Harwell, Waste: Dragon
menace. from had
widespread
scientists,
May 17.
both Europe claims
the out ‘ bearing
to s dangers Hall,
already
distribution,
wipe
afar, 1957. end, ‗ near
Lack of
the
‖ However,
on
is
thermonuclear The the being initiated
submitted 75 humankind,
and
defence
difficult
substance, life and the out
the of of evokes
been that first
final
Knowledge
-
North
the beast
b bearer Atlantic particularly heavily oth
they
atomic
against
The in by it disposal
scene
to the
nature in
is (and circulation
America.
the
is and
put even Manchester while
important writing
1950s contaminated.
‘ Ocean, radioactivity, testing now
Claim Health power of
nature) back destroyer.
and
of
a induced the
on marine serving
British radioactive
192 on to
human to
and in film,
the well station and
to Effects the
is The
sleep. the Guardian
other
remember put thus 14
a
Medical
one, It Prime before in as
ambiguities
Pacific
importance thorough
The
May history.
gives
in to of which
nesting Thermonuclear endanger
hand,
could material Sea Britain rest
1953 concerns
Minister Behemoth
life would Dumping, Ocean,
by that the
Atomic
human - gr come
11 to
the and of
of ound
monster
both in the
June the
print over
water asking which
the new
the ‖
and
pre
The for
-
CEU eTD Collection 195 Bruno, 194 Britain, Harwell plac anxieties brow Works through threats the features relation government Jones develo spectatorship) humans weapons Film
Matthew a is thus spectatorship ―Film‘s groups e. ‖
Although argues
and Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, Architecture, Art,in Journeys Atlas ofEmotion: These pments.
science imposed of
without to which are as aim
and
and Television Arendt,
the Jones. committed one
‘ threatened
s
to films
that the
providing
ability 1956 194 ―had fiction
mediations
of represent
alien
by harming
―1950s
discus
some the although
,
also
nuclear
7 lived‖ Suez
(2014):
to
invasion
rare renderings, to
Science by
put sion of provide an
abolishing its neighboring
crisis
― films renderings
on through
alternative
stress Big plants rese
31
in scientific practice practice
human
Fiction
- narratives 1957
but 54. rved Science. went security.
on thus on
the in
nuclear of space that is dwelt in, as in the built environment.‖ See Giuliana Giuliana See environment.‖ the built in,as in that isdwelt of space Cinema‘s made
the for
the progress
of past
addition
settlements
space through making nuclear
‖ the anti
research
195 home were
By
― apparent
infiltration
highest The - test as
nuclear Depersonalisation viewing
and
common which these to space 76 and Film and an front. s,
mistrust
establishments the
like
and important its
echelons for
films
sentiment. promised Windscale
SF
discussions
effects SF ‖ the Britain
(London and New York: Verso, 2002), 62. 2002), Verso, York: New and (London
the scenarios in
cinema
of
films,
CND
relevant
1950s British
the
contribution
Narratives on of
at
by ,
British
the As society, nature
accident) did large? provided
across
SF,
of and
these
public
for previously
British
not ―
film Big
in
problematized
understanding were Gove
Britain.
unfortunate fully Britain,‖ creep
to
that Science historian was an
public
the
rnment problematized.
important
understand
nature
into discussed, present
progress Science How
‖ (via
some could Matthew
scientific (both
and
the did nuclear
film in Fiction
niche
of of the these take even
in
―
low
CEU eTD Collection 199 198 197 196 space, housewife importance order had apparent publications once 4 .2. 1957,
TNA, Henri CCA, Anon.
a Harwellian life onnewsreels andindocuments
rural to While difficult
as 1
- , Lefebvre, CKFT AB recruit
2.
critique ― Henri
Nuclear -
British targeted
6/1711, of
Quatermass and
18/29, recruiting task
further Lefebvre
Production the Energy, of
areas,
Proposed
in
magazines. Cockcroft
the media
painting
talent
‖
Government
as
more
The II argued,
of
shopping
well at juxtaposed
in Spa Scotsman to
large
a people 198 newspapers
work ce as favorable 199
If
(Oxford,
the
center
painted
what
every , from
at
for 1957,
dangerous and
the
at
1945 scientific shape
England: representation SF society,
AERE,
41. problematized a establishment.
different -
films 1960. 77
world …the Researchat GroupHarwell, withits London. areawhere co commencing a thickly a business in populated areLondon& movingaway from desirous of progressive onlife,I, my& inour outlook Wife seekingbecause, information very being the facilities openI tothem areinadequate… am are f for quite happy,the but Research Workers who are e would [sic],it Telivision appear those that FromIread thePress what andseen have in on subject… and scientific advancement did
Letter
effects
Blackwell,
or
disciplines
than British
- ―
wide reputation as a source inspirationwide as reputation of
picture. from mode
through
of 197 Establishments of
both
John
nuclear J.S.
― 1991), itself,
Big of mpetition is not soacute not is asmpetition isin it
during The
Isaacs
the
production Cockcroft
Science, other
31. mployed at the variousmployed both
J.S. IsaacsJ.S. of effects research public
to Job Job advertisement, 1957
eminent
John
media for
throughout the country ‖
gained
of ‖ would the newsreels, Cockcroft, on thewhole
, act that shopping take
produces industrialization outlets.
addresses public
in Fay‟s Wear Fay‟s
a stress
more its
6
and Harwell
February official its
the
or
own in
in
196
of
CEU eTD Collection 201 200 Picture atomic nuclearity and 1947 was present two conditions university of university. and was Oliphant to science describes establishment? Harwellian experimental
find the TNA, CCA,
military life important agreed only
shows
The The University
a
village.
Harwell
research Post promised
CKFT AB
suitable
also provided
the - first place
on potential, in
The
incarnation? that 27/63,
the
needs
article
estab
general order nearby discussed
25/27,
conditions
occasion
The
authorities,
the village of for
center.
place lishment
of ― by
Note
Harwell in of
to
place published new the Letter
Oxford.
the
spaces, ―
way 1948. the bring the
of an setting
first
the In when Government
village
for a How
project), from d
should for Britain
Harwell
meeting
1945
person with
itself,
potential The scientists Tube
time
Already the choosing
Marcus
in the was of
is
newsreel newsreel Oliphant Oliphant December Alloys,
be
was
of Harwell.
as held press
to at
to was Harwell
set tomorrow.
well
Oliphant odds
have
places lead
by and and in at
‖ Ha
up further
and
16 1 a choosing
-
as
scientists rwell:
Didcot industrial wrote and the 2. also with short pleasant on Old It
1945 shaped newsreels for the
to juxtaposes
a British
Cockcroft,
Queen
gives ‖ John 78 molded
the military the
newsreel strategy to academics Although
Atom made
to
Cockcroft
usual ― Cockcroft, construction
to were
workers.
natural street,
a provide atomic
become glimpse
would
as Village
similar
base the
employed
British aware
of have a on
I
‖
and
dualistic, sleepy
wrote
1947,
11th 14 energy 201
surroundings (in plea to have
a
selected of claims.
produced September
leisure
that
I inform
pleasurable of countryside order
April
sant will living
about but
the village in the
it project.
both
choosing
1945, accommodation restrict
needed
official
to opportunity atomic For
activity. him
Harwell,
quarters
the 1945, cater by
with ―
and example, to
pure
200 about
British influence research
surrounding.
discuss
this
to 1 access research
to
However, to -
the the 2.
‖
offer of a
the
be
and analysis
the
village to
place
new the proposed Pathe
near a secrec
to
view
special urgency ― of and
applied
center. new
Harwell science
a
in The south
to
and y
‖
It
CEU eTD Collection 202 countryside in ― security don‘t photograph familiar
more Fyfe
The care
Robertson,
favorable man, ‖
.
1948 ‖ persona
202 representing setting
to
(Fig.
newsreels
a “ Atom
and contrast
is with
13)
shown.
less Village,
The
grass Harwell‘s
depicting of dehumanized
1947
This ” British
feeding Picture
would newsreel
cemetery
Harwell
countryside. Post,
cows
form. change
8
December, represents Fig. at
start is
the 79
reproduced
13 a
Neither with forefront. year
1945,
only
a later,
total
Cockcroft
12
with Harwell
(Fig.
- and
13. shot
a
Harwell
14)
caption of ‘
s nor
Harwell
barbed
any
would ―Harwellians
individualized
‘ w s
ire surroundings,
be
fence
represented
who
and
and
a
CEU eTD Collection 204 203 secretive) during interest divergent undermine by mediated fluid cases Nevertheless, newsreel
The Merton, the
point two The
The Secrets damaging his
of
emphasizes
by representation? The Secrets years and
time the security of what
the
of
view, Normative
the British some
Harwell
at
later.
government,
was
effect
space of the
and
as
of
Harwell
understood how public Manhattan Lefebvre
,
a
these Structure British
of
im of process,
the portance Harwell Harwell
with , secrets
Movietone
sought Fuchs
a
argues of newsreel
as rather
project. Science some
is will of
an
could
case
to heavily
the
that ―
News,
than show of ethos threaten ,
204
268. by
upon
project the
have the
It
t an
Issue
he
different guarded of press shows
production 80
the
accomplished Fig.
gotten
British science. to
no.1099, is
scientific seem
renderings put 14
that
because
to views
Movietone on
‖
to work the 26 203 of
the be
June
community. How space enemy of freeze
easily forefront: of of at
Harwell 1950.
the Harwell
Fuchs was
ought News
via
in breached
project
the time.
‘ Fuchs.
than
for secretive Fuchs to aims
was space
be ‘
example, Newsreels, s
the
importance. by
secret to looked Nevertheless, threatened
to
one capture espionage
undertakings render
(and
implied
the at
from
the
a
to
it
a
CEU eTD Collection 205 for scientists from taken comparative among newsreel newsreel too everyday a young was tmosphere
Inside
the is
a
its
The as concerned modern
and Harwell various
tone, Harwell, a
cameramen uses notion
seems
Gaumont whole, modern
of
analysis
music,
similar Establishment
young
production establishment.
to Ga of with
som
umont be workforce a
British
special treatment
were of and visual e easing aimed
differences
the British
happy
companies admitte
News
two
footage
and at the with
was
(Fig. News, the of
newsreels scientists anxieties secretive
Harwell also
a d part
younger in
usual,
16) on as Issue
their
through
produced
of the individual
no.
Harwell
that
eating place
industry and made
previous representation population
1719,
the had 81 employing Fig.
such
a by at
26 ‘ British basis newsreel - s arisen
like the
different 15 newsreel, project. June
was
— local
setting. and
1950.
in
Newsreel can Harwell. the manifold
with
relation
that
The cafeteria,
British
prospective be from
Science
the the detected. newsreel
(Fig.
Association. close it
material to title production
can
invoking the
was
15) - Inside
up
scientific
be Fuchs ends The
thriving, shots concluded had
first
with Harwell a companies
If case.
to serene
of a
employe newsreel, be
a
young and
GBN lively shared
that .
205 and
a
is
It ‘ es
s
CEU eTD Collection 206 to young Establishment introduction Cockcroft manifold cultural
Anon. prove Harlequin black mind with Just In
scientists.
,
magazine
1948, “ an
Editorial, talents
‘
consider s energy
is
outlet —
persona, on
his ‘
the s all
the
self
at was
” The fanciful
colours. for if Harlequin Harlequin, year
Harwell. his right.
- you
image,
to starts the atmo
characteristics.
of represent
will…
many
However, attire. first 206
sphere with
July is The
was
explained real
talents
On 1948, He
a first
and established, of huge
images
other is
the Harwell
4.
issue, create
a First the
photograph magazine creature
in characteristic
supposed from
length and
as the
was
thus expected 82
Fig.
foremost special, inside of
‘
indeed
s
in
providing
patchwork
of cho 16 Harwellian
the
Cockcroft
Harwell, of ice
from collaborative
editorial:
about
he Harl
of
is
a name, Chapter
made
equin
overflowing cultural cutting
scientists was
on
the
obviously up which also
atmosphere III -
edge
and of left
and a
held. squares
year
leaps artistic with page
science,
the
referring
Their
when
restlessness, and at importance
between of
sp once
but red, ace with
Harwell
to
it
to for silver,
an
the was
the
of
‘
s
CEU eTD Collection 210 209 208 207 Sandall Harwell, transfe Cambridge, would talent of scientific Freeman commenced the Freeman meet experience completed centers reincarnations. ― Elizabethian Adam Britain.
Cockcroft
Joan Freeman Freeman, Freeman, research
many
Freeman Howe to
rred
not
Hilger, Freeman.
to ‖ testify
see
but as continued See
circles.
want
grant
describes her A A onto working ―
ver,
an the
Harwell for
on legends Freeman, were Passion Passion
and ‖ 1991),
PhD in unusual
writes persona
A to a
book her what the governmental 209
Passion his journey their
move these
Cambridge:
159.
her dissertation doctoral What space for for in ‖
public
a
A
suggests was much of
s
respective
the
Passion Physics, Ph
gesture career should
a
activities to for the
ysics, viable to
Freeman of it
intimate Harwell?
Physics:
duties about like
Cambridge nuclear thesis.
Harwell ―
for in There
159. 151 that research be given
at
option for
Harwell. Physics,
memoirs?
-
harvested and
how
Newnham 152. are
scientific
the
environment did
Later is
people
age Joan
the
the still
deconstructed, Story opportunities
invigorating not for
establishments
to
like 102.
popularity for romantic
recruitment
Freeman, Her
recruit
continuing know of
that
A throughout
me
opportunities, Lise a College,
look first 83 Woman
no have
of
then,
young Meitner more
undertone
time
the
at a an as and
nd
done
is
Physicist would Harwell
their University
present delectable and Australian
Cavendish
and
that
manifold
high at scientifically
talent,
and
their
Harwell
which in not
―
he pure come -
of standing (Bristol, post
‘
at her s
was the
which
place
PhDs studying
Bulletins
Harwell ‖
filmic of
is
physicist -
laboratory nephew from research.
university
war was
being
apparent
Cambridge. of
Philadelphia
thrilling at
baffled
reception man Britain,
spent and Cockcroft eminent
at
as used from
‘ Otto
s
had
medieval
verbal Although both contrivance,
(where
when setting. during the
it
as
were 1950
recently
Frisch).
207 and
was of
university Fre bait young
himself,
She Cockcroft the New
she 210 eman being a
to to
for
Freeman
part
persona
in
also work 208 1955
York: would
all young
and Yet,
of
who
of ha
at
in
d
CEU eTD Collection 211 atomic welcome relationship then takes the security Harwell. conference an about British PhDs expanding motivated Hans weekly to opportunities and give (1955) AB
a international
AB
international military
thriving
much humanized
6/1295
Bethe, away The
and the 6/841
hub, newsreels basis.
guard
The to
nuclear
special marker
Harwellians
th assurance
Harwell in the Harwell
international but between application Victor university eir
shot for Every 1955.
and cameras
scientist knowledge also
with
delegations,
Harwell
program courses aim
of
dissolves Bulletins Bulletins carried
Weisskopf
The year
― a
Harwell that a
pure
t place
- o to clo
like
of
of World
represent
to
visitors. some Harwell, apply was scientific
‖ se
into (1953); foreign – (1950);
nuclear
the
and
atmosphere physics
with - of the
up
is
and also
the or vibrant
Harwell
famous Sees
still mastery for shot British
AB the
AB James
(Fig.
Cockcroft
Harwell scientists special
although given energy,
summer
employees
is stressed
Our 6/1560 6/990 camera of
often
international
17 scientist
John way,
Establishment
at of Chadwick.
particular Atom
) Harwell confinements
Harwell,
Harwell was their as The
its schools ‘
a and
in (and s Cockcroft. naturally.
a
state
special
84 to
Secrets fruitful
the
place also
newsreel
would subject. leaves
Bulletins further
the Bulletins
-
case
attention.
run
with In friendship hosti and
where
British
persona.
addition as
interwar starts come
British establishment them
of
211
This of
international
at their
ng represents an (1951);
(1954)
the
Ha A least
a foreign interlude
with audience)
at and
again
section range rwell.
careers. British
Pathe and
He to the
international
AB and three
give a this,
is
companionship
gate.
invokes
6/1154 general,
AB scientists Harwell of
Security,
presented then
for
audiences. conferences, dedicated to
lectures
special Indeed,
Bulletins scientific 6/1776 being
the Security celebrating
Harwell seen
the Geneva
birds
as
co
greeted Harwell lectures,
came
albeit
taking
Bulletins
bidding a
- an apparent
to
operation. informed
talks The short
Bulletins - measures
view
. important both thus
to
liaised
ato
Harwellian
Bulletins
security place by
and
learn visit
like
m
shot civilian
testify
the (1952);
peace and
on on
of are
of
CEU eTD Collection 212 and importance the not have But ―It more energy Bomb newsreel period Harwell‘s
CCA,
may
director. come turned here
given concretely
As
(UK,
of for
be CKFT
at
a company intensive
as
next
conclusion many the mankind Harwell future of
1958) a Cockcroft
26/5 surprise nuclear
place thermonuclear
the years
, nuclear
newsreel
Photographs, ―Harwell: People.‖ Photographs, as nuclear
the ZETA of the
taming
to energy
that
for
addressed the first
key
the
power
this
ZETA the debates apparatus.
begins
steps concerns to
thermonuclear
for
reactor
only great all
stations.
B
the
apparatus have the
ritain by
in person
British
public
Britain, ZETA power and Newsreel‘s associating
been .
Furthe
The questions
allowed
achi
through
into energy taken we was
Harwell
newsreel 85 Fig.
r evement
shall
a more,
represented
Harwell narrator
makeshift and
to
for 17
addressed his
ever
speak
was
this
British the
represents modest
to
remarks
with need.‖ benefits
represented handful reaches
in
TV in
television at this
employin and British
studio.
the After
the
on
newsreel of
of the calm
beginning
British space this humanity.
by newsreels power my 212
also g tone
British formidable (Fig.
thermonuclear
research,
inside is
scientists covered
station‘s
o
John of
n 18)
Taming
the Pathe in this
of
Cockcroft, 195
it
Harwell,
reactor: the
chapter,
would may stage. 8.
the
e
In vent
H
a
-
CEU eTD Collection under government‘s benefit, r even epresented
though
the In
rather
the
directorship
as
late thermonuclear
publicity, than a
place 1950s
destructive
were of
Britain,
this
John
dangerous energy
was
Cockcroft. potential.
Harwell
made
threatened
forces possible
stood According
are
to for 86
by
annihilate ―tamed‖
Fig.
the
the
to
peaceful 18
media special
and
human
renderings
groomed scientific app
lication life.
Harwell
to
atmosphere and
serve of
British nuclear
was humanity‘s
at post
energy,
Harwell - war
CEU eTD Collection 213 weapons making scientists science destruction work the uses environment. were weapons. Troubling destructive, common Although Science
Peter post
―aliens‖
represented brought The
- Hutchings, was and
war Fiction
was for
were
International historians Atomic aspect
was
threatening
nationalism
already the
environment,
to ―Alien viewed painful
Cinema depicted
refer made post
of ―‗ as
Age We
the both w too s -
to war
, as death ‘ at arn
apparent re
ed.
began scientists,
disco
to multiple technical as crucial Harwell‖ were
the
ending
I.Q. public
that
end devoid aloof
Martians to
very
Hunter
with
tied
WWII the humanity,
by for
WWII from across aspects
particularly
for
unfortunate was touches of into the
Hiroshima
British (London: now
human did ordinary
t British
that the he
‘ C the and : .
British not
ONCLUSION First, alter
Briti
many deterrence
diplomacy humans world.
endangering Routledge,
feelings end
1946 nuclear
and Japanese sh people nature
87
tensions. onlywith internal temporarily, social subsequ clarify …the function toreveal of is thealiens and nuclear SF
aspects because
society.
invasion Nagasaki Nuclear
report were
and
and 1999), strategy.
to physicists, and something that is already thatis something there,withtheir
entmeans destruction a ofdealing, if scientists population.
213
understan
of behind the
sympathy
forever However, of fantasies cit self
weapons
British 40.
explosions ed nuclear already -
conception
The in
the
working
were
change of this d
post
possession
because
The
the the production British are weapons, uncertain
thesis.
viewed 1950s -
Peter Hutchings
in workings war powerful extent
human
on August as
post
―their‖ nuclear
and
a wartime Second,
as the post modern of
of
of - 1960s,
war history.
monsters
nuclear
of and nuclear 1945. notion n -
uclear
scie war
culture it policy
‖
modern projects and
in post
ntific
British was
the in
- - and war
CEU eTD Collection the Man intertwined issues scientific ― hostilities state because had paradigmatic arts that it of European themselves nuclear scientists and anxieties state. aliens
had
politics,
. series
more argued science
C. is had
How In
to of
‖
an P.
program
they Chapter by
hold
popularizing
to felt
engagements by
things writer é it Snow example
migr did understood
tha
who nationality, be in
could felt
employing
encompassed by of on
sophisticated t limited the
é the
‘ towards the
and the were at s to had
I, scientists
only Two
post
stake I
of its
British
post
public?
have presenter. to
debating the
science. claim in
- that
– Cultures thrive successfully war transcend - H
p than war its Bronowski
Cold outlined arwell ost
government the in
Michael
British media grip This to
-
period war a order in
future However, T independence. the War fight
an lectures he over and thesis
ma ―
the renderings?
future
Big independent government post
for
Polanyi fetishiz had
adapted in against
ny Cockcroft
of
scientific troubles
science particular, Science
addressed provided
-
obstacles science
not war
and wh of
ation
science
resonated and at international
to scientist the
Polanyi
88
happened
British The ‖ to
Britain as freedom
represent
in
and
Jacob debates institutions. positive
of
withstand imposed this
reached markers the
1970s science, in creative
became
question
and troublesome scientific with post and Bronowski,
and that
when
representations Communism. its
BBC
the
Bronowski - of by
made
Polanyi Hiroshima
the
with
nuclear the
atmosphere Po have
the more the peak
Bronowski -
through
postwar lanyi produced ― public
careers aliens nuclear Bronowski public
occurred
although
post in than and
program
and
his both
environment.
‖
had
- multiple
T
Bronowski.
chaos war
and
the
felt. out
like
program. of he career Bronowski, show ‘
s
worked
to
nuclear as
gatekeeper stakes ideas on of environment.
scientists
himself
The
that to
ease and the
their different
The
around alleviate perspectives
found British
were most
uncertainties the were
to
science
Ascent Science postwar
Central acting
both prove
to the
i higher,
poles n the
the
The
the
of
and as
CEU eTD Collection 215 214 career and media the the Perhaps the communicate Government the anticipated continuation crisis. unfavorable multi and his/her wonders new Biological Scientists the
Bronowski
The
atomic American British program. control positive
development
causal media In In
.
Nevertheless, but
failure These public
it Chapter Chapter of
and
chose is
Sciences Government bomb.
re
the
nature of endeavor. was
circumstances
of rendering of nderings and of
Who
the representations
a McMahon engagement,
public
international
fall
equal
wider British particularly of
Decision to III, II, the
Britain
American
in 19
would of
sacrifice
I
the in
I
scientists Cold
(1989): knowledge presented importance
the message
studied It
recent of nuclear
and
wartime
was to
Act
exploited Baruch a lead arms influential
War
Build
thermonuclear —
homely, became
280 music media that
on (restricting
imply
m
public‘s the
control, were
-
onto research.
Western the 281. the ultiple
one
-
for on employed
as plan
project program
Superbomb, on succeed
government‘s
the
an
that the British the the aware his side
the
Richard
(on
example distrust
representations
media
weapons.
bomb, nuclear
country success
The
the Europe Baruch This access a
international
that risk,
and
scientist in British Symphony government
Dawkins
1952 was potential
their
to 89
of plan,
this
es stand
program. and of See to and and
mo
publicity
nuclear
-
of done information), human 1954,‖
scientists Peter aims had
was
the
‘ who lead ld North
Britain. of to popular
of
Science the
of
an arms to
well Government represent
?
Galison
succeeded Historical
a
had
The John
science, exploding important modesty
be
right strenuous America strategy
science
before
The control strongly shaped
. the
British
Co and
kind both
prospect marker
Studies British ckcroft
and
. event Barton
work
214 in . regarding anyone
its with accor
The had of research
in post
supported
communicating
the
.
first which
nuclear 1946. in Both
Berns to nuclear
of scientist, across
-
the
dingly, post of the war
could
work nuclearity atomic
scientists
a
led Soviet Physical 215 tein, the establishment.
- ―lazy‖ experience
war
scientist
the to different
The
research?
around production h in
―In
a through
ave
financial bomb.
new post order Union)
have
and Any academic
a
is
turn
unified -
to
often
war Light: found
to was
Did run
in and
a
CEU eTD Collection The that theoretical employed never their experience nuclear place across organization Campaign Thermonuclear nuclear study of graduates projected complex. Cockcroft the The
Harwell.‖
young
both representation British
annual,
for Harwell In of actually
Britain.
threats research
Chapter British
sci ―
Even as
like
in
British pure and . for workings
nuclear
The entists
friendly creating Easter did
‘
John Nuclear
strove s Spaceways ‖
Harwell daunting
though
weapons
1950s
unique
Campaign and was not IV,
audience
and of
- experience, Sandalls
time
criticize
― I of and
undertaken, to bombs,
Cockcroft applied
problematized
SF
the
Disarmament
the had ― these
associate
on
golden marches threatened intimate.
, cinema
size
had British
during for the a
who
formidable ‖ weapons, Harwell difficult
science Nuclear an
of British
similarly years in
.
any served
regarded
science from
opportunity
public. The the The the
to
these organized ‖
injustice
film‘s was task
film bring public
could analyzed
latter (under among London Disarmament
as nuclear
to employed Harwell,
there
in positive Cockcroft‘s
Spaceways the the
complete screening.
representations
live order in
Cockcroft) to
90 other to
dominant
American
annual
to the
to
films
threats
witness
― side
Harwellian Aldermaston
employ
although to representations
wake
was things.
would represent by we annihilation.
might marches
directorship In lurking
colossal,
the re
example side,
of have and the
―
the
pure
1957 not resonat workings continue
have ‖
end, Soviet
not
served science. only
itself
behind (the to the ‖
British its science
of threatened abolish
the had
of
Although
ed
only as
media weapons
the relationships one, as
nuclear to
to British of
part with a
research
Although
a
protest British
favo cater
establishment a thermonuclear
pleasurable
was and nuclear
military renderings of young
rable
by the
public, factory), science ―the
to study imbedded
(spatially) nuclear
establishments each
the British
not
tests, were golden Br reception - industrial
the impression
itish in
other. and directly by of
but
where
case the
tests. a in
safe
years with it
by of
CEU eTD Collection upon nuclear under example, transcultural, aspects inspire production requires production from war unfortunately planet cosmopolitanism of was secrecy international small large
the
nuclear a
my military in
―Aliens in
place John good in
further
of project
build the its more
research. the an
the
and or
public Cockcroft‘s
archives time
of science.
important quiet
and
-
comparative
bombs necessary, reception at
British industrial space scholarly an
under reception
Harwell‖
in
companion were extended
and British It
physics
and suggest However, is
that
nuclear the
inside study at an
of directorship)
complexes. work a
test
guidance could together the
c
unfortunate focused fusion study cultural
ountryside university, of
-
that
could explosions core perception like. culture.
on the
important potentially
of
Harwell of the
interwar of in It
on
texts. of be Harwell
divergent
Science, was
the a reception
for
An Professor the
commenced committed fact single yet
in by institution
the not In
interesting production aspect
and
on
that
bring distant era,
representing order
with
establishment
only MA which a
the methodologies
91 of scholars la
where Pavle
of havoc
rge
other
for to
these Yugoslav an thesis. Maralinga.
‘ on t
s
hese
had scientific
aspect scale. institution of life. the
how international Savić.
nuclear
and media
popular
must
turned
Harwelli
production Nevertheless, representations
Post
influential and
It
of despair Nuclear
. Documents
represented
either
excellence, - Hence, a renderings
war research
representation ―
where future knowledge big an
aliens conferences to
‖
choose
spaces and Institute
and
I was
unfortunate scientists
study
this was establishments. ‘
reception
that
itself of colossal, reception found and
Ha
thesis to as about not
Harwell might
rwell I
at
study few, of humane,
have
as
able
Vinča and their
would the
hopes
an British
nations.
to
remained be (particularly
is
the
stumbled
to
Yugoslav extension
or be
home
missing a
were
bring
in
other For merged to
post
It
the
-
CEU eTD Collection France 218 217 216 public‘ The contesting unfavorable resistance‖ power censoring controlling ―power.‖ thesis universiti and Harwell government establishments, important program. an collaborating
offi Jann Matlock, JannMatlock, CCA,CKFT FO 371/189498. TNA,
―safe latter
―Aliens
has (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 15. 1994), Press, University (New Columbia York: In cial wo s
concerns incarnation,
217 an - es,
British
rks haven‖ awaits also scientific and visit ―official‖
218 nuclear
environment representations smartly but
in
intensively
was at 11/12, ―Letter from Sir John Cockcroft,‖ 20 March, 1961, 1 1961, March, 20 Cockcroft,‖ John Sir ―Letterfrom 11/12,
positive made
Scenes of Seduction of Scenes
to
like mult
Harwell‖ at
political
a
for
over Yugoslavia
addressed
nuanced governmental
representations.
addresses.
the
chose iple
apparent representations particularly young
scientific nuclear
nuclear
ways.
during of
parties, has
to
study closely science of
in
exclusively
that argue in
ity
British
What this
: Prostitution, Hysteria, and Reading Difference in Nineteenth century century Nineteenth in Difference Reading and Hysteria, Prostitution, : weapons
the
project. 1961 .
during
research
both
of Nevertheless, the
d guarded thesis Furthermore,
1950s graduates the and
cultural
that
production
governmental and Labour
1950s Cockcroft‘s
making Although factory
focus
the
through establishments personally and
representations,
historian British
who and 92
cinema 1960s. on
this at sense
of they
some Harwell.
Conservative, the continued Aldermaston,
representations
science. directorship, thesis
nuclear 216 inspected
‘s
were project of Jann
of
reception Furthermore,
(e.g. British
argued British
The also
Matlock
it program
Cinema
their
included Joan is
the
-
British
2. 2. interested
nuclear important
were the
has
in that science
scientific
Yugoslav Freeman). is
relation
British referred
is
provided was
tied John inte
a
troublesome nuclear
an
nuanced program‘s
fiction rested into represented
important in
to Cockcroft
post
careers
to
surveilling nuclear to
remember
However,
the
an
program‘s the as
-
in war cinema‘s
inspiration
workings
a
British guiding
complexity.
not
―history
spac
was as
at
that and
this an e
on
for
and
of
of
CEU eTD Collection bringing historiography
forth
the which
com
includes plexity
of
both
― nuclear
verbal
culture
and
93 visual .
‖
historical
reminiscence
is
important
for
CEU eTD Collection
------
Campaign Tube The Prime Ministry Information Foreign The The The Society Mass The Churchill British Archives Minutes Division
Papers Papers Papers Security National
Alloys Observation
Minister
for Library, Office:
of
for College
Freedom
of of of and Supply and
Research
Consultative Service:
Sir Sir Lord Nuclear Archives, ‘
s Papers Political London
Office: London Thomas John
Archive
and Archives, Plowden
in
Personal Department
Disarmament (CAB Cockcroft Science United
Office:
Departments Correspondence Kew
Council Fife
(UK)
(PLDN
126) Cambridge
(UK)
Kingdom Clark Files pamphlets
Files
Primary sources (CKFT
(FO and
(KV 5)
pamphlets (FICA
(AB (FO
Combined 1110)
94
Atomic
11; 2) and
16) (UK) 371)
2)
17; Papers,
Energy 18; Policy
20;
1945
Committee 24; Authority, - 1951
25;
26;
(PREM
Atomic 27) (Atomic
8)
Energy
Energy):
CEU eTD Collection Wo The The The The Picture The The The Harlequin Everybody Encounter Documentary The Newspapers - - - - rld
Times Times Sunday Press New Manchester Listener Daily United United United United
Review
Post by Administration: Establishment, Establishment,
Scientist
Mirror and
(UK) of (UK) (UK)
(UK) the Post
(UK) Kingdom Kingdom Kingdom Kingdom (UK) India
News
(UK)
Journal Department
Guardian
(UK)
(UK)
(UK)
(UK)
Letter
Atomic Atomic Atomic Atomic (UK)
Harwell: Harwell:
Correspondence
(UK) (UK)
of
Energy
Energy Energy Energy Energy
Cockcroft Correspondence
(EG
Policy: Authority: Authority Au
and thority
1)
Papers
Papers
Minutes, 95
and and
London and
(AB
(AB predecessors: predecessors:
Papers
27) Papers
48) Office:
(AB
and
Scientific 6)
Registered Atomic Atomic
Energy Energy and
Files
Technical
Research Research
inherited
CEU eTD Collection The Tami Spaceways Seven The Quatermass Operation Invasion Inside Didcot Devil The Czechoslovakia British Behemoth, Attack
Secrets Day World ng
Girl
Days Harwell
of Atom Progress
the
Earth of the
from Hurricane
the Sees
(UK, the H
to of
II Crab Village -
Bomb Noon Harwell
Sea
(UK, Body Caught (UK,
Mars Crucified Our
in 1953)
Monsters
Monster Atomic
1957) (UK, Atom (UK, (UK, Snatchers 1950)
(UK, (UK,
Fire (UK,
(UK, 1950) 1958) Secrets 1947)
Energy
1952) 1954) (UK,
(UK,
(USA, 1950)
(USA, 1940)
1959) 1961)
(UK,
Research
1957)
1956)
1955) Filmography
(UK, 96
1948)
CEU eTD Collection Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Sunday Mission 1988, December, 1950. 11 Ministry
― ― Industry The ―Editorial,‖ ―Documentary ― ―‘Cockcroft ― Atomic ― A.E.R.E: ― 3 Not Macmillan Cover BEPO Atom
February,
Hamlets
Effects
12. Even
Post - Scientist
to Attack: up passes of
and The
Japan.
1948,
Supply, of
Asked
,
of
in
Harlequin, 1950, ordered of
5
Schools.
Atomic fire
the Plutonia.
March,
‗ the - Can Windscale
Sent A 5.
London:
at Atomic
if
1.
Atom‘ National 1949.
Britain Windscale They
Windscale
Energy for
1950, London:
‖ July
The Trial:
‘ Bombs
talks re ‘ His
test.
Be
Asset.‖ 1948, 5.
Communists: Research Daily
Majesty
Defended?
‗ Federation to monstrous, censorship. ‖ Jekyll
at
Th Britain‘s
Bibliography 4.
Mirror, Hiroshima Documentary e
Manchester
‘ and Establishment, s 97
Stat
London: of Scandal Hyde charges
‖ citizen‘s 10
The ionery British
and March
Personality. Times
News Guardian,
of Nagasaki: Tory
Association
Office,
of Industries,
,
Alien
Harwell, 1949, tomorrow.‖ ,
1 Letter MP.
January,
1946. Influx
‘‖ 2. ‖ 17
Report
The
5,
The
1965.
Berkshire. of March,
1944,
Scientific into
Guardian The 1988, Press
of
Britai
Daily
42 the 1958,
1. and
- London: 43.
British
, Workers, n.
Mirror,
2
Journal 1. ‖
January,
The
29 ,
CEU eTD Collection Biskind, Bernal, Benjamin, Barthes, Baylis, Aubin, Arnold, Arendt, Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Anon. Fifties. Harvard 194 Culture, Astronomers 2007. 1957, September, Pict
― ― ― ― ― ―
David.
John
Sir Scientists Our Nuclear J.D. Windscale: Where Hannah.
Lorna.
Roland. Peter. - ure
210
Walter. John
5.
£ The
and
London:
Post
. 100,000,000
University
and ―
is Seeing New Windscale
The
Energy.
Cockcroft:
Social The Kristan “ science
1957, whose ,
The ‘
The
I 25
‗
dentity.
Urban Fading Nobody York:
Promise
Bloomsbury, is August,
Photographic Arcades
Function 26 ‖
Believing: research S
taking Press,
The
1957: - t
Culture Hill oddart. 27. Atom
Star Oxford: The ‘ s
Scotsman
of Hea 1945,
and
Project us?
2002.
alchemist of
Anatomy Politics.
of Stake. gave
The lth of
the
‖ How
Wang, Science 2000. Oxford
Message.‖
Mass 13
Circulation
Affected.
Paris British Britain . - ‖ ,
14. Cambridge,
1957, Hollywood
Picture
New ‘ of
s 1983. Observation .
University
dream Observatory London: a
Nuclear 98
Nuclear and York: 41.
‘‖ In
Post
and The
A America was
Taught Massachusetts Barthes
Schocken George
Observation. , Manchester
7
Experience:
Press, Accident. fulfilled. Report
December in
the the Us
Reader Routledge 2015.
2489, Nineteenth to secrets Books: ‖
London:
The
Stop ‖ Guardian
The 1946, and Osiris ,
May, edited
New
of Worrying
New
Role London, and
atomic Palgrave
9
18 Century: 1947, Scientist
-
by ,
10. Sons, York,
of
9 (2003):
Susan November,
Beliefs,
En energy. and 7.
1946.
2007.
Macmillan,
gland: ,
12
Love Sontag, 79
- ‖
100.
the
CEU eTD Collection Cock Cockcroft, Cockcroft, Clark, Chibnall, Chibnall, Chapman, Burkett, Bruno, Brown, Bronowski, Bronowski, Brenn croft, Berkshire Universities Macmillan, 2009. Approaches. 639. Earth York: Plutonium Ltd, Champaign, en,
Ronald.
Giuliana. Kate.
Jodi.
Bonnie Steve. Steve
1956.
James, John. John. John.
in Jacob. Jacob. Verso,
Plutopia: ―The the
Sir
. and
“
London:
Disasters. Forward ― ― Atlas
and
2007.
Quota nuclear Mark
First Catch
and IL: John
London: Science The 2002.
Campaign Brian
Hanno University
Colleges of
Session, Dilemma
Nuclear
Glancy Cockcroft.
our Quickies
Emotion:
Ministry age.‖ to McFarlane.
and
Oxford,
Palgrave
scientists A.E.R.E: Hardt.
for
Human
The and
of 15
Families,
of of
” Nuclear
Technology.
: of
London:
November
Journeys
the Picturing UK: Illinois Sue British The
Macmillan,
Supply,
The The young!
Scientist. Va
Harper. Birth Oxford
lue. Atomic Disarmament Atomic British
Journal
Press, Phoenix
i
‖ n
the
1949. of 1 99 Harmlondsworth,
Everybody Art, London: 956.
University The
the London:
2007.
Past:
„B‟ Energy Cities, 1999.
for
Architecture, ‖
British New House,
The Film,
Media, the
and The
and
, Research Film National Education
20
History
Press, London: “
1959. changing
Institute B the October,
” History, History:
-
Middlesex:
Film. Great
and 2013.
of Peace E
British of
stablishment,
Science
of Film
attitudes
London: 1956, Physicists
Soviet and
Sources, Physics,
Council, .
Lo Photography. Film Penguin
19.
45 and ndon
towards Palgrave
(2012): Methods, 1956.
Institute,
in
American 1955. Harwell,
and
Books
the
New
625
-
CEU eTD Collection Galison, Freeman, Fielding, Enticknap, Desmarais, Defty, Davy, Daum, Daston, Daston, Cockcroft, Cockcroft, (1989): Superbomb, and North 1999. The Research Dumping. Knowledge: - Medicine
John.
Andrew. Andreas 128.
Lorraine Lorraine
Peter
Raymond.
Joan. New British
John. John. Leo.
Ralph.
Carolina: ―
Scientists 267
and
York:
Department. 52 A
‖ Britain, W ―
―The ―
and and The - The Journal Passion
The
347. . 1952 Some (1959): ―Jacob Barton
―Varieties The
Peter Peter Adam Manchester Non
McFarland Scientist Peaceful
- Clash
1954. America American Historical
for
- Bronowski: Bernstein, for 487 Fiction Galison. Galison.
Hilger,
London the
Physics: ‖ on of -
493. Historical Uses and
History
Popular Atomic and &
Guardia
Film Newsreel: Reflections.‖
1991. the Company, Objectivity ―
―
and of The Anti
In
a the
Public. Atomic in Humanist
Any
of Waste:
New Science
- Image
Studies Story Post n Communist
Science ,
22 A Light: 100
York: ‖ - 2006.
.
War
Complete
Energy.‖
November,
of Harlequin New ‗ of Isis
Lack
and
in
Intellectual
a
Objectivity.
45
Scientists
Britain.
the Woman 100 Routledge,
York: the
Propaganda, (2012): of
Physical
(2009): Proceedings Transformations Knowledge History, ,
Christmas, 1959, ‖ Zone
Physicist.
PhD
for
and 573 ‖
2004.
Representations
319 and
an Books,
17.
1911 - the diss., 589.
1945 Atomic -
‘
332. Biological
Decision
of
Claim 1959, Bristol,
-
University
the - 2007. 1967.
53:
of
Age, Royal 25. on Public
The
Philadelphia
to
Jeffers
Effects Sciences
40
1946 Information B
Society of
uild
(1992):
Exeter, on, -
1956.‖ of the
19
Sea of
81
CEU eTD Collection Hill, Henriksen, Hennesy, Harrisson, Hansen, Gowing, Gowing, Gorst, Gordin, Goodman, Goodchild, Grant,
Jason London: Berkeley, vii. a Volume Volume Princeton: 1 and University Houndmills,
Anthony Matthew. -
Multicultural 22.
Michael.
Randal.
Margaret. Margaret.
London: Peter. Klaus
Tom. Michael
E. Margot Peter.
a
II. I. Bloomsbury, nd
California: and
Forward
Fuchs.‖ London: Princeton
― Citizenshi Press, After
London:
Five Scientists Edward
Vanessa Palgrave Basingstoke:
. A. Independence Independence
Lewis ―The
Nation
Dr. the Days
2004.
Historical
to
The
grandfather Bomb:
The Strangelove
Teller:
University p Johnman. R.
University
Windscale Macmillan, —
2015. . in and
Oxford: Schwartz. Macmillan
Macmillan August: Magicians
Palgrave
Immigration
Civil The and and
Studies
The
Press,
of Oxford
Real ‟ Deterrence: Deterrence: of
1957: Defence s How
2007.
Getting
America: the
California Press,
Macmillan,
Suez or Press,
in Dr.
hydrogen 2007.
World Monsters?
Anatomy
the 101 University in
Crisis.
Strangelove. and 1974.
the Post 1974.
Physical
Society
Britain Britain
War
Press, Nuclear Picture:
-
2010.
war
London:
bomb?: of ‖
, Two
Press, a World
and 1997. Britain:
and and and Nuclear
Cambridge,
War The Became
Anglo
Culture
Biological Atomic Atomic Routledge, 2000
Review
Visual in
The
Accident, Britain, . -
American a
Energy, Energy,
in
Institutional , Nuclear
Culture 10 Mass.:
the Scie
1997.
April, 1945
Atomic by nces
1945 1945
intelligence Harvard
War.
of Lorna -
68. 1947,
the 34
Origins
- - Age.
1952. 1952.
(2003): News. Arnold,
5.
of
CEU eTD Collection Laucht, Laucht, Kevles, Jones, Jenkins, James, Hutchings, Hunter, Hughes, Holloway, Hollinger, Nuclear the and New Science PhD Academic, Routledge, 1960s. Journal Haven after
Matthew. Anthony.
Chri Christoph. Daniel I.
John. Jeff.
History
nuclear
Q.,
David
diss., World David. York: Peter.
‖ stoph. and
―What editor. Fiction In for Culture ―
J. Hot
University
British ―
2011. London: The 1999.
A. Vint of The
the ―‗ 1950s War education S
Elemental ―
talin We
News/Cold Science Atoms ―
British is
History Science Happy Film Physicists: age
1939
II. ‘ British
re
Science Science and ‖
Books, Yale
the Isis
and for
-
of
in Science 45 1959. Passion: the
of
Germans: as
Martians
California nuclear the
86 the
(2012): Television University
War:
Science
Fiction a
Bomb: Fiction
The
1979.
(1995): Weapon Atom people: London:
Fiction
The
History
A culture?
591
now
the
45 Cinema, Personal Klaus Cinema Train Berkeley,
, British
440
Press, the
7
- in (2012): Soviet Palgrave 608. ‘
Cinema. : (2014):
- of Kulturkampfe 102 British
Atomic
454. exhibition, Fuchs, Understanding
‘ a
s 1994. edited
State,
View
Scientific Union
Depersonalisation
495 2
000.
31
Macmillan, Abingdon: SF
Rudolf Scientists
-
of Propaganda, 51 - by
invasion
and 54.
Jacob 1947 8.
I.Q.
Community
in
Peierls Atomic
Uranium
the - Hunter,
1948. ‘
Routledge, Bronowski,
2012.
Association, fantasies
United
and
and Energy, Narratives ‖
The
33 235
in the
the States
-
Modern
47. of
British .‖
1999. News
Exeter:
Making
1939
the The the London
in during
1950s
British
British
- Media. Britain. Journal America. 56.
Imprint
of :
New
and British and
state ‖ ‖
for
CEU eTD Collection Nye, Nye, Noonan, Moorehead, Mirzoeff, Merton, Mead, Mayer, Matlock, Matlock, Macnaghten, Lefebvre,
Mary Mary Historical Weapons 2006. Chicago of Science ideology Lexington B. 1964.‖ Nineteenth
Margaret
Anna
Science
Robert Clarke,
Bonnie.
Jann. Jann.
Nichol Henri.
Jo. Jo.
Alan.
- In
Phil K. 30
‘
and ― ―
―Vacancies: Scenes , Following Moving Historical A K.
Studies - 1931 and Valerie Books, as.
― The (1957): century
Women
Theoretical Setting and Physicist The ― London:
The The
Rhoda Production
- John of Traitors.
1948.
Pictures/Stopping 2009. in
Visual Crawford Normative
38
Seduction: France. Scientists up
sources the the
4 Urry. M in Hotels, The
- a ‖
390.
é and War.
the discipline, P
Studies traux Culture
hysical London: University
of
C New
Corridors of Empirical Pfannhauser,
‖
ontested in Reception Structure Space
, Prostitution, Physics
science
― Fifties
Image in York:
Reader and
History Hamish II: .
Places: Oxford
of
Biological Natures. of
British -
in Investigations, Science as Columbia of of
103 Chicago Desk
,
Power: -
Perspective
social London and the Science.
and Hysteria,
Hamilton,
, Hotels
UK: s,
history Scientist Marcus
London: Fiction and Philosophy -
P.M.S. practice: Sciences Press,
University
Blackwell and ‖
and Identity In
of and
1
edited
1952.
A.
New Robert
among Films.
(1999): 1973. science Motels Blackett Sage
Doel,
Reading Michael 37
of
York:
in
by Press, Publishing,
(2007):
Publications,
Jefferson, Science
K. High American
on 73 136 and Norman ‘
s Merton:
-
Routledge, Film Difference Polanyi Opposition
141. - - 1994.
156. ‗ School
the 409
35 ,
Lanham:
NC: edited
end
W. 199 -
Cinema, (2004):
434. The ‘
s
2000. Students.
Storer.
1 Berlin, of
McFarland,
in
1998. .
Sociology
to
by
Atomic 41
1929 David
‖ -
72. ‖
-
CEU eTD Collection Saunders, Sandalls, Sagan, Thomson, Tagg, Robertson, Robertson, Price, Porter, Polanyi, Polanyi, Polanyi, Polanyi,
New Evesham, Internat Foundation Minneapolis Press, Society Pamphlet Routledge, John. Leah.
Scott Theodore
Michael. Michael Michael. Michael.
John.
Francis
Ge
York: Fyfe. Fyfe.
The 2012.
How D. orge. for ional
Thirty No.
―Why Worcestershire:
Disciplinary
.
Freedom ― ― 2005. M.
The
of to
Personal ― ― ―The Stonor.
What Atom
and
― The Pure
Security
4, Speeches do the ―
- How
New
six do February,
London:
things
Two Planning
Society. Calder and Village.
States years
The in
Press, Science
Knowledge:
20
Applied Cultures.
Science
Frame:
made with Cultural
(1996):
Hall
at
University ‖ build ‖ Perfect
1946: of
2000. Society Picture the
books
Became
Science.‖ at means
,
Science
Photographic
‖ Nuclear Atomic: Occassional
the
1 54
Cold Encounter
Image, - Towards
14. in
for
Dinner Post, -
of
to
86. Victorian
Technical.
War: Freedom
and
104 Minnesota
You. Society Weapons?: My
2004. 8
held a December, their ,
time
The Pamphlet ‖
September,
Post
Truths Picture
for
Britain.
to
‖ in A CIA at
-
Isis
ppropriate Critical Press, celebrate
Freedom Science
AERE Three
and and
Post
100 No. 1945,
Princeton:
19
the 2009.
the
Harwell, Models
(2009): , , 14, Philosophy.
59,
March 25
the
in
Capture 12 Forms World
December
February, 61 Science
- Tenth 13. -
in 65.
292 Princeton
1951,
1958
of
of
Search
of
-
Anniversary
, Arts Organization. 309. London:
Occassional Meaning. -
3. 1957, 1953: 1994.
and
of
University
a
28. 1
Letters.
Bomb.‖ -
13.
of
‖
the
CEU eTD Collection Vincent, Suvin, Sutherland, Storer, Snow, Shaw, Shapin, Shapin, Seed, Schwartz, Schwartz,
November, Genre. Proceedings Investigations. Press, London Lond through History (2001): Champaign, Media, David.
Tony. C.P. Darko. Norman
Steven. Ste
Arthur
Donna. Vanessa on:
ven.
The Gordon. 1961.
British New
― History,
1721
of and the
Seven Metamorphoses The
.
W. The ― Two
Science
―
Discipline 1955,
Externalism
Nigel
― New IL: Haven
of
R.. University - Objective Robert
Scientific Cinema 1743.
Days Chicago Cultures ― the
and University
British ―Walter
York: 62.
Kneale:
45 Manchester and
Photography, to
K.
(2012): and
and
Noon
Representation:
- and London: and Merton: I. and
Life: of Internalism
of Benjamin
B. Bounding: The
Chicago of the Science
American London:
the :
Tauris,
A 641 Containing Illinois
Cold Human
Literary
Moral
Scientific
The Yale -
652. edited
for Fiction:
Press,
War:
Debate. 2001.
Sociology The The
Press,
University
Universities
History Core Historians.‖
105 Photographs and
by
the University History
Revolution. The
2008.
1999. ‖ On of Bonnie
Philosophical Atomic
History
State, of
Science
of the
a
Press,
and Science
Late —
Poetics The
Brennen
Propaganda of as Threat.
of New Sociology Some
Fiction. Chicago
Facts. 1979.
American Modern Science
-
Society
York: and Theoretical
‖ Comparisons.
and
‖ The
‖ In
History
Press, Vocation. 30 of Picture
Hanno
and
Cambridge Picturing
Historical British 102
Science (1992):
Consensus.
1973. (1959):
and of
Hardt Post
Journal
‖ a Chicago
333 as the Me Empirical
Literary
Review , University
, 26
seen
1 moirs - Past: 159 - 369.
14.
for
- and 181.
106
and the
CEU eTD Collection Woods, Wilford, Wells, Weisskopf, Weiner, Weber,
159 Pa 2003. I.Q. Coast Press, Donald Thirties.‖ Tracy
Paul.
Max.
Phillip. rtition,
Charles. Hugh. .
Hunter Basingstoke,
…
Victor.
B. 1969. ―
― Fleming Apocalypse an
Science
Strong,
1947 The In ―‗
interview , ―A
Business 48 The
The
CIA, - New - 1948. 56.
and Intellectual 1 as
Joy Hampshire: -
31.
London: the a Then!: Site
Bernard
with ‖
Vocation. as of
In Indianapolis British
Usual? Insight: for
Media Nigel
the
the
Routledge, Migration: Bailyn,
Palgrave and Ultimate ‘ ‖
Seminar:
Kneale.
and British Passions In
the
The and
the 190
Cold
Macmillan,
‖ 106 Cambridge: Vocation Newsreel 1999. Monstrosity British Europe
- The In
228. of
War:
British a
Refugees
Physicist. Cambridge,
Empire, and
Lectures Calling Coverage
Science
2006.
Hackett
America, and
and
edited
New Strange
the ,
Mass.: edited
Fictio American of Publishing
Tune?.
York
1930
Indian by
Things
n
by Chandrika Harvard
- Cinema : 1960
London:
David Basic Independence
Physics
Company,
on ,
edited
Universit
, Books,
Owen
the
edited Kaul,
Routledge, in
by the
and
2004. 1991. 145 by
and
y
-