DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom Concepts Drive Mode Mechanism Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freedom Concepts Drive Mode Mechanism Final Report DECEMBER 5, 2018 FREEDOM CONCEPTS DRIVE MODE MECHANISM FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR: COLIN BOCK, FREEDOM CONCEPTS JIM SYKES, P. ENG., E.I.R., ADVISOR FACULTY OF ENGINEERING MECH 4860 – ENGINEERING DESIGN TEAM 11 JEREMY DRACHUK IAIN FRIESEN JORDAN HOFER JOSH LINSANGAN SCOTT VERCAIGNE Letter of Transmittal December 5th, 2018 Colin Bock Freedom Concepts 2087 Plessis Rd Winnipeg, MB, R3W 1S3 [email protected] MECH 4860 – Team 11 University of Manitoba 66 Chancellors Circle Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2 Subject: Letter of Transmittal Dear Colin Bock, Our team is pleased to submit to you our final design report for the Drive Mode Mechanism for Freedom Concepts Inc., marking the completion of phase one of the project. This report will be followed up with the phase two beginning in January 2019, during which our design team will validate the Drive Mode Mechanism through prototyping and testing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact any of the team members signed below. Sincerely, Team 11 Jeremy Drachuk Joshua Linsangan Scott Vercaigne _ Jordan Hofer Iain Friesen Cc: Jim Sykes ii Executive Summary This report marks the completion of phase one (design) of the Drive Mode Mechanism project submitted by Freedom Concepts Inc. for the MECH 4860 – Engineering Design course at the University of Manitoba. The second phase (prototype) will begin in January 2019 and will be completed in April 2019. Freedom Concepts Inc. is a Winnipeg based company that designs and manufactures adaptive tricycles and mobility devices for people living with disabilities. The company has tasked the student design team with the development of a tool-free mechanism to accomplish two separate drive modes for the rider (freewheel and direct drive) and that is compatible with all current tricycle models. The current mechanism being used on the tricycles relies on frictional contact between four set screws and a standard freewheel sprocket to toggle between the two modes. Although functional, actuation requires the use of a tool and has proven too cumbersome for the average caregiver. The design team conceptualized a two-way ratchet mechanism capable of supporting a freewheel and direct drive mode with a single switch actuation. This concept was developed through research, concept development, and feedback from the client and the course advisor. The mechanism consists almost entirely of laser cut sheet metal and off-the-shelf components from McMaster-Carr® to reduce low-volume production costs and facilitate design changes in the prototyping phase. The estimated cost of the prototype design is $133.99. To meet the requirements set by the client, the design features two spring loaded pawls, one of which can be rotated away or toward an internal gear profile using a switch to support the freewheel or direct drive modes. The sprocket can be easily interchanged with any of the 18, 22 or 26-tooth variations to deliver all three pedaling difficulties that a customer may order. To maximize the lifespan of the device, the design is supported by a full stainless-steel construction, sealed bearings and maintenance plan. Included with the final design is a detailed installation procedure, bill of materials, cost breakdown, preliminary failure modes and effects analysis, and a complete package of preliminary drawings including all three custom sprocket sizes. These deliverables fulfill all requirements of the project as established by Freedom Concepts. An alternative internal tooth profile is also included and will be tested in the prototyping phase. The intuitive and easily actuated toggle switch will improve the user experience and encourage the use of the freewheel and direct drive modes as intended by Freedom Concepts. iii Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Project Timeline .................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Target Specifications ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4.1 Client Needs ................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Technical Specifications ................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Constraints and Limitations .................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Concept Development Summary .......................................................................................... 5 2.0 Detailed Design ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Sprocket Design .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Pawl Design ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Toggle Mechanism .............................................................................................................. 12 2.4 Material Considerations ...................................................................................................... 14 3.0 Design Summary ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Preliminary Failure Modes and Effects Analysis ................................................................. 15 3.2 Maintenance ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Assembly Procedure ........................................................................................................... 17 Pawl Disc Assembly: .............................................................................................................. 17 Sprocket Assembly: ............................................................................................................... 19 Installation Procedure: .......................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Cost Summary ..................................................................................................................... 21 4.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 22 5.0 References .............................................................................................................................. 23 Appendix A – Concept Development ........................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B – Stress Analysis ........................................................................................................ B-1 Appendix C – Preliminary Failure Modes and Effects Analysis .................................................... C-1 Appendix D – Bill of Materials...................................................................................................... D-1 Appendix E – Preliminary Engineering Drawings ......................................................................... E-1 iii List of Figures Figure 1. Present method of operation on tricycle ........................................................................ 2 Figure 2. Project timeline ................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3. Two-Way Ratchet concept ............................................................................................... 6 Figure 4. Teeth Engagement concept ............................................................................................. 6 Figure 5. Two-Way Ratchet exploded view .................................................................................... 8 Figure 6. Design mechanism - a) freewheel mode b) fixed drive mode ......................................... 9 Figure 7. Interchangeable sprocket designs: a) triangle tooth design b) gear tooth design .......... 9 Figure 8. Sprocket design projected from standard tooth profiles .............................................. 10 Figure 9. 26, 22, 18-tooth sprocket options ................................................................................. 10 Figure 10. Pawl and gear design in a typical ratchet .................................................................... 11 Figure 11. Design mechanism - a) Freewheel mode b) Direct drive mode .................................. 12 Figure 12. Standard freewheel pawl design ................................................................................. 12 Figure 13. Toggle assembly ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gears and Gearing Part 1 Types of Gears Types of Gears
    Gears and Gearing Part 1 Types of Gears Types of Gears Spur Helical Bevel Worm Nomenclature of Spur-Gear Teeth Fig. 13–5 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Rack A rack is a spur gear with an pitch diameter of infinity. The sides of the teeth are straight lines making an angle to the line of centers equal to the pressure angle. Fig. 13–13 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Tooth Size, Diameter, Number of Teeth Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Tooth Sizes in General Industrial Use Table 13–2 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design How an Involute Gear Profile is constructed A1B1=A1A0, A2B2=2 A1A0 , etc Pressure Angle Φ has the values of 20° or 25 ° 14.5 ° has also been used. Gear profile is constructed from the base circle. Then additional clearance are given. Relation of Base Circle to Pressure Angle Fig. 13–10 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Standardized Tooth Systems: AGMA Standard Common pressure angles f : 20º and 25º Older pressure angle: 14 ½º Common face width: 35p F p p P 35 F PP Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Gear Sources • Boston Gear • Martin Sprocket • W. M. Berg • Stock Drive Products …. Numerous others Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Conjugate Action When surfaces roll/slide against each other and produce constant angular velocity ratio, they are said to have conjugate action. Can be accomplished if instant center of velocity between the two bodies remains stationary between the grounded instant centers. Fig. 13–6 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Fundamental Law of Gearing: The common normal of the tooth profiles at all points within the mesh must always pass through a fixed point on the line of the centers called pitch point.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to Basics
    BACK TO BASICS. • • Gear Design National Broach and Machine Division ,of Lear Siegler, Inc. A gear can be defined as a toothed wheel which, when meshed with another toothed wheel with similar configura- tion, will transmit rotation from one shaft to another. Depending upon the type and accuracy of motion desired, the gears and the profiles of the gear teeth can be of almost any form. Gears come in all shapes and sizes from square to circular, elliptical to conical and from as small as a pinhead to as large asa house. They are used to provide positive transmis- sion of both motion and power. Most generally, gear teeth are equally spaced around the periphery of the gear. The original gear teeth were wooden pegs driven into the periphery of wooden wheels and driven by other wooden Fig. 1-2- The common normal of cycloidal gears is a. curve which varies wheels of similar construction ..As man's progress in the use from a maximum inclination with respect to the common tangent at the of gears, and the form of the gear teeth changed to suit the pitch point to coincidence with the direction of this tangent. For cycloidal gears rotating as shown here. the arc B'P is theArc of Approach, and the all; application. The contacting sides or profiles of the teeth PA, the Arc of Recess. changed in shape until eventually they became parts of regular curves which were easily defined. norma] of cydoidal gears isa curve, Fig. 1-2, which is not of To obtain correct tooth action, (constant instantaneous a fixed direction, but varies from.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Involute Spur Gears with Asymmetric Teeth & Direct Gear
    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 1 Issue 6, August - 2012 Design of Involute Spur Gears with Asymmetric teeth & Direct gear Design G. Gowtham krishna 1, K. Srinvas2,M.Suresh3 1.P.G.student,Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, DVR AND DHM college of Engineering and technology, Kanchikacherla, 521180,Krishna dt, A.P. 2.Associat.professor, Dept of Mechanical Engineering,DVR AND DHM college of Engineering and technology, Kanchikacherla, 521180,Krishna dt, A.P. 3.P.G.student,Dept. of Mechanical Engineering,BEC,Bapatla,Guntur,A.P. Abstract-- Design of gears with asymmetric teeth that production. • Gear grinding is adaptable to custom tooth shapes. enables to increase load capacity, reduce weight, size and • Metal and plastic gear molding cost largely does not depend vibration level. standard tool parameters and uses nonstandard on tooth shape. This article presents the direct gear design tooth shapes to provide required performance for a particular method, which separates gear geometry definition from tool custom application. This makes finite element analysis (FEA) selection, to achieve the best possible performance for a more preferable than the Lewis equation for bending stress particular product and application. definition. This paper does not describe the FEA application for comprehensive stress analysis of the gear teeth. It sents the engineering method for bending stress balance and minimization. Involute gear Introduction Conventional involute spur gears are designed with symmetric tooth side surfaces . It is well known that the conditions of load and meshing are different for drive and coast tooth's side. Application of asymmetric tooth side surfaces enables to increase the load capacity and durability for the drive tooth side.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Involute Gear Analysis and Tooth Profile Generation Using Working Model 2D
    AC 2008-1325: INTERACTIVE INVOLUTE GEAR ANALYSIS AND TOOTH PROFILE GENERATION USING WORKING MODEL 2D Petru-Aurelian Simionescu, University of Alabama at Birmingham Petru-Aurelian Simionescu is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Alabama at Birmingham. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of Dynamics, Vibrations, Optimal design of mechanical systems, Mechanisms and Robotics, CAD and Computer Graphics. Page 13.781.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Interactive Involute Gear Analysis and Tooth Profile Generation using Working Model 2D Abstract Working Model 2D (WM 2D) is a powerful, easy to use planar multibody software that has been adopted by many instructors teaching Statics, Dynamics, Mechanisms, Machine Design, as well as by practicing engineers. Its programming and import-export capabilities facilitate simulating the motion of complex shape bodies subject to constraints. In this paper a number of WM 2D applications will be described that allow students to understand the basics properties of involute- gears and how they are manufactured. Other applications allow students to study the kinematics of planetary gears trains, which is known to be less intuitive than that of fix-axle transmissions. Introduction There are numerous reports on the use of Working Model 2D in teaching Mechanical Engineering disciplines, including Statics, Dynamics, Mechanisms, Vibrations, Controls and Machine Design1-9. Working Model 2D (WM 2D), currently available form Design Simulation Technologies10, is a planar multibody software, capable of performing kinematic and dynamic simulation of interconnected bodies subject to a variety of constraints. The versatility of the software is given by its geometry and data import/export capabilities, and scripting through formula and WM Basic language system.
    [Show full text]
  • VIRTUAL HOBBING E. BERGSETH Department of Machine Design, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SUMMARY Hobbing Is a Widely Used Machining Proc
    VIRTUAL HOBBING E. BERGSETH Department of Machine Design, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SUMMARY Hobbing is a widely used machining process to generate high precision external spur and helical gears. The life of the hob is determined by wear and other surface damage. In this report, a CAD approach is used to simulate the machining process of a gear tooth slot. Incremental removal of material is achieved by identifying contact lines. The paper presents an example of spur gear generation by means of an unworn and a worn hob. The two CAD-generated gear surfaces are compared and showed form deviations. Keywords: gear machining, CAD, simulation 1 INTRODUCTION analysis of the tolerances applied to gears, each step in the manufacturing process must be optimized. Better The quality and cost of high precision gears are aspects understanding of the geometrical variations would which are constantly of interest. Demands stemming facilitate tolerance decisions, and make it easier to from increasing environmental awareness, such as meet new demands. lower noise and improved gear efficiency, are added to traditional demands to create (MackAldener [1]) a Gear manufacturing consists of several operations; challenging task for both manufacturers and designers. table 1 shows an example of a gear manufacturing To be able to adjust to these demands, a design must be sequence for high precision external spur or helical robust; that is, it must deliver the target performance gears. regardless of any uncontrollable variations, for example manufacturing variations. Manufacturing variations can include geometrical variations caused by imperfections in the manufacturing process, for example, wear of tools. The geometrical deviations of each part must be limited by tolerances in order to ensure that the functional requirements are met.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kinematics of Conical Involute Gear Hobbing
    The Kinematics of Conical Involute Gear Hobbing Carlo Innocenti (This article fi rst appeared in the proceedings of IMECE2007, The technical literature contains plenty of information the 2007 ASME International Mechanical Engineering regarding the tooth fl ank geometry (Refs. 8–9) and the setting Congress and Exposition, November 11–15, 2007, Seattle, of a hobbing machine in order to generate a beveloid gear Washington, USA. It is reprinted here with permission.) (Refs. 10–15). Unfortunately, the formalism usually adopted makes determination of the hobbing parameters a rather involved process, mainly because the geometry of a beveloid Management Summary gear is customarily—though ineffi ciently—specifi ed by It is the intent of this presentation to determine all rigid-body positions of two conical involutes that resorting to the relative placement of the gear with respect mesh together, with no backlash. That information to the standard rack cutter that would generate the gear, even then serves to provide a simple, general approach in if the gear is to be generated by a different cutting tool. To arriving at two key setting parameters for a hobbing make things worse, some of the cited papers on beveloid gear machine when cutting a conical (beveloid) gear. hobbing are hard reading due to printing errors in formulae A numerical example will show application of the and fi gures. presented results in a case study scenario. Conical This paper presents an original method to compute the involute gears are commonly seen in gearboxes parameters that defi ne the relative movement of a hob with for medium-size marine applications—onboard respect to the beveloid gear being generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gears Dr.-Ing
    TECHNICAL Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gears Dr.-Ing. Burkhard Pinnekamp, Dr.-Ing. Michael Heider, and M.Sc. Andreas Beinstingel Introduction Besides power density, reliability and efficiency, noise is always an important criterion for a successful gear design. In many theoretical and experimental in- vestigations and papers, the influences and potential remedies were discussed. For example, in (Ref. 6) the importance of a large overlap ratio, achieved by a large helix angle is described as the most important factor for reducing gear noise. In planetary gear systems of high power density and high gear ratio, heli- cal gears create undesirable tilting mo- ments on the planet gears; therefore, Figure 1 Noise: generation, transmission and radiation. spur gears are still preferred for plan- etary gears — a special challenge with respect to noise. Specifically, the dif- ferent behavior of planetary gears with sequential and symmetric gear mesh is explained in this paper. As described (Ref. 10), the variable mesh stiffness along the path of con- tact in the tooth contact leads to oscil- lating forces on the shafts and bearings, which are transmitted to the casing. The casing vibrations radiate airborne noise (Fig. 1). The influence of tooth geometry on the excitation behavior is determined by the geometry parameters, such as Figure 2 Contributions to single tooth contact deflection along path of contact (Source: FZG TU Munich). profile and overlap ratios, flank modifi- cations and manufacturing deviations. For design to low noise emission, the knowledge of the elastic and dynamic behavior of the transmission system and the excitation mechanisms of the gear mesh is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Information Spur Gears Gear Nomenclature
    Engineering Information Spur Gears Gear Nomenclature ADDENDUM (a) is the height by which a tooth projects GEAR is a machine part with gear teeth. When two gears beyond the pitch circle or pitch line. run together, the one with the larger number of teeth is called the gear. BASE DIAMETER (Db) is the diameter of the base cylinder from which the involute portion of a tooth profile is generated. HUB DIAMETER is outside diameter of a gear, sprocket or coupling hub. BACKLASH (B) is the amount by which the width of a tooth space exceeds the thickness of the engaging tooth on the HUB PROJECTION is the distance the hub extends beyond pitch circles. As actually indicated by measuring devices, the gear face. backlash may be determined variously in the transverse, normal, or axial-planes, and either in the direction of the pitch INVOLUTE TEETH of spur gears, helical gears and worms circles or on the line of action. Such measurements should be are those in which the active portion of the profile in the corrected to corresponding values on transverse pitch circles transverse plane is the involute of a circle. for general comparisons. LONG- AND SHORT-ADDENDUM TEETH are those of BORE LENGTH is the total length through a gear, sprocket, engaging gears (on a standard designed center distance) or coupling bore. one of which has a long addendum and the other has a short addendum. CIRCULAR PITCH (p) is the distance along the pitch circle or pitch line between corresponding profiles of adjacent teeth. KEYWAY is the machined groove running the length of the bore.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Fundamentals of Gear Drives
    Basic Fundamentals of Gear Drives Course No: M06-031 Credit: 6 PDH A. Bhatia Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] BASIC FUNDAMENTALS OF GEAR DRIVES A gear is a toothed wheel that engages another toothed mechanism to change speed or the direction of transmitted motion. Gears are generally used for one of four different reasons: 1. To increase or decrease the speed of rotation; 2. To change the amount of force or torque; 3. To move rotational motion to a different axis (i.e. parallel, right angles, rotating, linear etc.); and 4. To reverse the direction of rotation. Gears are compact, positive-engagement, power transmission elements capable of changing the amount of force or torque. Sports cars go fast (have speed) but cannot pull any weight. Big trucks can pull heavy loads (have power) but cannot go fast. Gears cause this. Gears are generally selected and manufactured using standards established by American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) and American National Standards Institute (ANSI). This course provides an outline of gear fundamentals and is beneficial to readers who want to acquire knowledge about mechanics of gears. The course is divided into 6 sections: Section -1 Gear Types, Characteristics and Applications Section -2 Gears Fundamentals Section -3 Power Transmission Fundamentals Section -4 Gear Trains Section -5 Gear Failure and Reliability Analysis Section -6 How to Specify and Select Gear Drives SECTION -1 GEAR TYPES, CHARACTERISTICS & APPLICATIONS The gears can be classified according to: 1. the position of shaft axes 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Gears & Gear Drives
    GEARS AND GEAR DRIVES GEAR TYPES .....................................................A145 GEAR TYPES 99%. Some sliding does oc- GEAR BASICS ...................................................A153 cur, however. And because ears are compact, SPEED REDUCERS ............................................A158 contact is simultaneous positive-engagement, across the entire width of G power transmission SELECTING GEAR DRIVES................................A162 the meshing teeth, a contin- elements that determine ANALYZING GEAR FAILURES...........................A168 uous series of shocks is pro- the speed, torque, and di- duced by the gear. These rection of rotation of driven rapid shocks result in some machine elements. Gear types may be objectionable operating noise and vi- grouped into five main categories: bration. Moreover, tooth wear results Spur, Helical, Bevel, Hypoid, and from shock loads at high speeds. Noise Worm. Typically, shaft orientation, ef- and wear can be minimized with ficiency, and speed determine which of proper lubrication, which reduces these types should be used for a partic- tooth surface contact and engagement ular application. Table 1 compares shock loads. these factors and relates them to the specific gear selections. This section on gearing and gear drives describes the major gear types; evaluates how the various gear types are combined into gear drives; and considers the principle factors that affect gear drive selection. Spur gears Spur gears have straight teeth cut Figure I — Involute generated by parallel to the rotational axis. The unwrapping a cord from a circle. tooth form is based on the involute curve, Figure 1. Practice has shown the tool traces a trochoidal path, Fig- Figure 2 — Root fillet trochoid generated that this design accommodates ure 2, providing a heavier, and by straight tooth cutting tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Choice of the Shaft Angle for Involute Gear Hobbing Carlo Innocenti
    Optimal Choice of the Shaft Angle for Involute Gear Hobbing Carlo Innocenti Management Summary With reference to the machining of an involute spur or helical gear by the hobbing process, this paper suggests a new criterion for selecting the position of the hob axis relative to the gear axis. By adhering to the proposed criterion, the hob axis is set at the minimum distance from the gear axis, thus maximizing the depth of the tooth spaces of the gear. The new criterion is operatively implemented by solving a univariate equation, which stems from a new, synthetic analysis of the meshing of crossed -axis, involute gears. A numerical example shows application of the suggested procedure to a case study and compares the optimal hob setting to the customary one. Introduction 4 and 5—do not question the standard choice Hobbing of both spur and helical gears is of the hob setting angle as the sum of the gear generally done by setting the axes of the gear pitch helix angle and of an angle that charac- and the hob at an angle that is the algebraic terizes the hob. sum of the pitch helix angles of gear and hob This paper first revises the kinematics of (Refs.1–2). Such a standard way of determin- meshing two crossed- axis, involute helical gears ing the shaft angle—although conducive to sat- (Refs. 3 and 6), and presents an original, concise isfactory results—does not rely on a convinc- relationship for determining the meshing back- ing rationale. Suffice it to say that any referral lash in terms of the gear dimensions, shaft ax- to pitch helix angles is questionable because is distance and shaft axis angle.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Error in Spur Gears: Static and Dynamic
    Transmission Error in Spur Gears: Static and Dynamic Finite-Element Modeling and Design Optimization By Raul Tharmakulasingam BEng. MSc. (Eng) Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Engineering and Design Brunel University United Kingdom October 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “Success is sweet: the sweeter if long delayed and attained through manifold struggles and defeats.” I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has helped me in my pursuit of success in my PhD. Firstly; I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Giulio Alfano for helping me shape my research and motivating me at the right times with a timely reminder of how much we have achieved. I would also like to Dr Mark Atherton for bringing a fresh perspective to everything we did during the research, and always providing a kind ear and an objective view to all our problems. I am also very grateful to Prof. Luiz Wrobel for providing me with the opportunity to undertake my PhD research, and also helping me with my numerous problems while carrying out my research. To the colleagues who helped me with moments of respite during a hard day’s work, inspiration by example, and lasting friendships, I thank you from the bottom of my heart and look forward to keeping in touch. My family who have endured my worst and celebrated my best of times during my PhD also receive a heartfelt embrace and acknowledgement for everything they have done for me. My dear friends who constantly reminded me of my duty to hand in my Thesis by the incessant question “Have you submitted yet?”.
    [Show full text]