Gears & Gear Drives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gears & Gear Drives GEARS AND GEAR DRIVES GEAR TYPES .....................................................A145 GEAR TYPES 99%. Some sliding does oc- GEAR BASICS ...................................................A153 cur, however. And because ears are compact, SPEED REDUCERS ............................................A158 contact is simultaneous positive-engagement, across the entire width of G power transmission SELECTING GEAR DRIVES................................A162 the meshing teeth, a contin- elements that determine ANALYZING GEAR FAILURES...........................A168 uous series of shocks is pro- the speed, torque, and di- duced by the gear. These rection of rotation of driven rapid shocks result in some machine elements. Gear types may be objectionable operating noise and vi- grouped into five main categories: bration. Moreover, tooth wear results Spur, Helical, Bevel, Hypoid, and from shock loads at high speeds. Noise Worm. Typically, shaft orientation, ef- and wear can be minimized with ficiency, and speed determine which of proper lubrication, which reduces these types should be used for a partic- tooth surface contact and engagement ular application. Table 1 compares shock loads. these factors and relates them to the specific gear selections. This section on gearing and gear drives describes the major gear types; evaluates how the various gear types are combined into gear drives; and considers the principle factors that affect gear drive selection. Spur gears Spur gears have straight teeth cut Figure I — Involute generated by parallel to the rotational axis. The unwrapping a cord from a circle. tooth form is based on the involute curve, Figure 1. Practice has shown the tool traces a trochoidal path, Fig- Figure 2 — Root fillet trochoid generated that this design accommodates ure 2, providing a heavier, and by straight tooth cutting tool. mostly rolling, rather than sliding, stronger, root section. Because of this contact of the tooth surfaces. geometry, contact between the teeth The involute curve is generated occurs mostly as rolling rather than Spur gears are the least expensive to during gear machining processes us- sliding. Since less heat is produced by manufacture and the most commonly ing gear cutters with straight sides. this rolling action, mechanical effi- used, especially for drives with parallel Near the root of the tooth, however, ciency of spur gears is high, often up to shafts. The three main classes of spur gears are: external tooth, internal tooth, and rack-and-pinion. External-tooth gears — The most common type of spur gear, Figure 3, has teeth cut on the out- side perimeter of mating cylindri- cal wheels, with the larger wheel called the gear and the smaller wheel the pinion. The simplest arrangement of spur gears is a single pair of gears called a single reduction stage, where output rotation is in a direc- tion opposite that of the input. In other words, one is clockwise while the other is counter-clockwise. Higher net reduction is pro- duced with multiple stages in 2001 MSD ● Motion System Design ● A145 Chordal thickness Circular thickness Figure 4 — Internal (ring) gears produce a rangement, the plan- complex form of output with a planetary ets may be restrained configuration of sun, planets, and ring. from orbiting the sun and the ring left free closure in these applications, but to move. This causes some type of cover may be provided to the ring gear to rotate keep dirt and other contaminants in a direction opposite from accumulating on the working that of the sun. By al- surfaces. lowing both the planet carrier and the Helical gears ring gear to rotate, a differential gear drive Helical gearing differs from spur in Figure 3 — Spur gears have straight teeth is produced, the output speed of one that helical teeth are cut across the cut parallel to the rotational axis. shaft being dependent on the other. gear face at an angle rather than Rack-and-pinion which the driven gear is rigidly con- gears — A straight nected to a third gear. This third gear bar with teeth cut then drives a mating fourth gear that straight across it, Fig- serves as output for the second stage. ure 5, is called a rack. In this manner, several output speeds Basically, this rack is on different shafts can be produced considered to be a from a single input rotation. spur gear unrolled Internal (ring) gears — Ring and laid out fiat. gears produce an output rotation that Thus, the rack-and- is in the same direction as the input, pinion is a special Figure 4. As the name implies, teeth case of spur gearing. are cut on the inside surface of a cylin- The rack-and-pin- drical ring, inside of which are ion is useful in con- mounted a single external-tooth spur verting rotary motion gear or set of external-tooth spur to linear and vice gears, typically consisting of three or versa. Rotation of the four larger spur gears (planets) usu- pinion produces lin- ally surrounding a smaller central ear travel of the rack. pinion (sun). Conversely, move- Normally, the ring gear is station- ment of the rack causes the pinion to Figure 5 — Rack-and-pinion gearing ary, causing the planets to orbit the rotate. produces linear travel from rotational sun in the same rotational direction The rack-and-pinion is used exten- input. Shown here is spur gearing. Helical gearing is also available, but is not as as that of the sun. For this reason, sively in machine tools, lift trucks, common because the helical teeth create this class of gear is often referred to as power shovels, and other heavy ma- thrust, which produces a force acting a planetary system. The orbiting mo- chinery where rotary motion of the across the face of the rack. Worm rack is tion of the planets is transmitted to pinion drives the straight-line action also available, the axis of the worm the output shaft by a planet carrier. of a reciprocating part. Generally, the (pinion) being parallel to, rather than In an alternative planetary ar- rack is operated without a sealed en- perpendicular to, the rack. A146 ● Motion System Design ● MSD 2001 compact than double-heli- shafts. This overhung load (OHL) cals. However, the gear cen- may deflect the shaft, misaligning ters must be precisely gears, which causes poor tooth con- aligned to avoid interfer- tact and accelerates wear. Shaft de- ence between the mating flection may be overcome with strad- helixes. dle mounting in which a bearing is Cross-helical gears — placed on each side of the gear where This type of gear is recom- space permits. mended only for a narrow There are two basic classes of range of applications where bevels: straight-tooth and spirals. loads are relatively light. Straight-tooth bevels — These Because contact between gears, also known as plain bevels, teeth is a point instead of a have teeth cut straight across the face line, the resulting high slid- of the gear, Figure 9. They are subject ing loads between the teeth to much of the same operating condi- requires extensive lubrica- tions as spur gears in that straight- Figure 6 — Helical gears have teeth cut tooth bevels are effi- across the face at an angle for gradual cient but somewhat loading. noisy. They produce thrust loads in a di- straight, Figure 6. Thus, the contact rection that tends to line of the meshing teeth progresses separate the gears. across the face from the tip at one end Spiral-bevels — to the root of the other, reducing the Curved teeth provide noise and vibration characteristic of an action somewhat spur gears. Also, several teeth are in like that of a helical contact at any one time, producing a gear, Figure 10. This more gradual loading of the teeth that produces smoother, reduces wear substantially. quieter operation The increased amount of sliding ac- than straight-tooth tion between helical gear teeth, how- bevels. Thrust load- ever, places greater demands on the ing depends on the di- lubricant to prevent metal-to-metal rection of rotation and contact and resulting premature gear Figure 7 — Double helical Figure 8 — Herringbone whether the spiral failure. Also, since the teeth mesh at gearing uses two pairs of gears have opposed teeth angle at which the an angle, a side thrust load is pro- opposed gears to eliminate joined in the middle. teeth are cut is posi- duced along each gear shaft. Thus, thrust. tive or negative. thrust bearings must be used to ab- sorb this load so that the gears are tion. Thus, very little held in proper alignment. power can be trans- The three other principle classes of mitted with cross- helical gears are: double-helical, her- helical gears. ringbone, and cross-helical. Double-helical gears — Thrust Bevel gears loading is eliminated by using two pairs of gears with tooth angles op- Unlike spur and posed to each other, Figure 7. In this helical gears with way, the side thrust from one gear teeth cut from a cylin- cancels the thrust from the other drical blank, bevel gear. These opposed gears are usually gears have teeth cut Figure 9 — Straight-tooth bevel gears are manufactured with a space between on an angular or conical surface. efficient but somewhat noisy. the opposing sets of teeth. Bevel gears are used when input and Herringbone gears — Teeth in output shaft centerlines intersect. these gears resemble the geometry of Teeth are usually cut at an angle so Hypoid gears a herring spine, with ribs extending that the shaft axes intersect at 90 deg, from opposite sides in rows of paral- but any other angle may be used. A Hypoid gears resemble spiral- lel, slanting lines, Figure 8. Herring- special class of bevels called miter bevels, but the shaft axes of the pinion bone gears have opposed teeth to gears have gears of the same size with and driven gear do not intersect, Fig- eliminate side thrust loads the same their shafts at right angles.
Recommended publications
  • Gears and Gearing Part 1 Types of Gears Types of Gears
    Gears and Gearing Part 1 Types of Gears Types of Gears Spur Helical Bevel Worm Nomenclature of Spur-Gear Teeth Fig. 13–5 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Rack A rack is a spur gear with an pitch diameter of infinity. The sides of the teeth are straight lines making an angle to the line of centers equal to the pressure angle. Fig. 13–13 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Tooth Size, Diameter, Number of Teeth Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Tooth Sizes in General Industrial Use Table 13–2 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design How an Involute Gear Profile is constructed A1B1=A1A0, A2B2=2 A1A0 , etc Pressure Angle Φ has the values of 20° or 25 ° 14.5 ° has also been used. Gear profile is constructed from the base circle. Then additional clearance are given. Relation of Base Circle to Pressure Angle Fig. 13–10 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Standardized Tooth Systems: AGMA Standard Common pressure angles f : 20º and 25º Older pressure angle: 14 ½º Common face width: 35p F p p P 35 F PP Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Gear Sources • Boston Gear • Martin Sprocket • W. M. Berg • Stock Drive Products …. Numerous others Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Conjugate Action When surfaces roll/slide against each other and produce constant angular velocity ratio, they are said to have conjugate action. Can be accomplished if instant center of velocity between the two bodies remains stationary between the grounded instant centers. Fig. 13–6 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Fundamental Law of Gearing: The common normal of the tooth profiles at all points within the mesh must always pass through a fixed point on the line of the centers called pitch point.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to Basics
    BACK TO BASICS. • • Gear Design National Broach and Machine Division ,of Lear Siegler, Inc. A gear can be defined as a toothed wheel which, when meshed with another toothed wheel with similar configura- tion, will transmit rotation from one shaft to another. Depending upon the type and accuracy of motion desired, the gears and the profiles of the gear teeth can be of almost any form. Gears come in all shapes and sizes from square to circular, elliptical to conical and from as small as a pinhead to as large asa house. They are used to provide positive transmis- sion of both motion and power. Most generally, gear teeth are equally spaced around the periphery of the gear. The original gear teeth were wooden pegs driven into the periphery of wooden wheels and driven by other wooden Fig. 1-2- The common normal of cycloidal gears is a. curve which varies wheels of similar construction ..As man's progress in the use from a maximum inclination with respect to the common tangent at the of gears, and the form of the gear teeth changed to suit the pitch point to coincidence with the direction of this tangent. For cycloidal gears rotating as shown here. the arc B'P is theArc of Approach, and the all; application. The contacting sides or profiles of the teeth PA, the Arc of Recess. changed in shape until eventually they became parts of regular curves which were easily defined. norma] of cydoidal gears isa curve, Fig. 1-2, which is not of To obtain correct tooth action, (constant instantaneous a fixed direction, but varies from.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Control of a Large Modular Robot Hexapod
    Design and Control of a Large Modular Robot Hexapod Matt Martone CMU-RI-TR-19-79 November 22, 2019 The Robotics Institute School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Thesis Committee: Howie Choset, chair Matt Travers Aaron Johnson Julian Whitman Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Robotics. Copyright © 2019 Matt Martone. All rights reserved. To all my mentors: past and future iv Abstract Legged robotic systems have made great strides in recent years, but unlike wheeled robots, limbed locomotion does not scale well. Long legs demand huge torques, driving up actuator size and onboard battery mass. This relationship results in massive structures that lack the safety, portabil- ity, and controllability of their smaller limbed counterparts. Innovative transmission design paired with unconventional controller paradigms are the keys to breaking this trend. The Titan 6 project endeavors to build a set of self-sufficient modular joints unified by a novel control architecture to create a spiderlike robot with two-meter legs that is robust, field- repairable, and an order of magnitude lighter than similarly sized systems. This thesis explores how we transformed desired behaviors into a set of workable design constraints, discusses our prototypes in the context of the project and the field, describes how our controller leverages compliance to improve stability, and delves into the electromechanical designs for these modular actuators that enable Titan 6 to be both light and strong. v vi Acknowledgments This work was made possible by a huge group of people who taught and supported me throughout my graduate studies and my time at Carnegie Mellon as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Involute Spur Gears with Asymmetric Teeth & Direct Gear
    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 1 Issue 6, August - 2012 Design of Involute Spur Gears with Asymmetric teeth & Direct gear Design G. Gowtham krishna 1, K. Srinvas2,M.Suresh3 1.P.G.student,Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, DVR AND DHM college of Engineering and technology, Kanchikacherla, 521180,Krishna dt, A.P. 2.Associat.professor, Dept of Mechanical Engineering,DVR AND DHM college of Engineering and technology, Kanchikacherla, 521180,Krishna dt, A.P. 3.P.G.student,Dept. of Mechanical Engineering,BEC,Bapatla,Guntur,A.P. Abstract-- Design of gears with asymmetric teeth that production. • Gear grinding is adaptable to custom tooth shapes. enables to increase load capacity, reduce weight, size and • Metal and plastic gear molding cost largely does not depend vibration level. standard tool parameters and uses nonstandard on tooth shape. This article presents the direct gear design tooth shapes to provide required performance for a particular method, which separates gear geometry definition from tool custom application. This makes finite element analysis (FEA) selection, to achieve the best possible performance for a more preferable than the Lewis equation for bending stress particular product and application. definition. This paper does not describe the FEA application for comprehensive stress analysis of the gear teeth. It sents the engineering method for bending stress balance and minimization. Involute gear Introduction Conventional involute spur gears are designed with symmetric tooth side surfaces . It is well known that the conditions of load and meshing are different for drive and coast tooth's side. Application of asymmetric tooth side surfaces enables to increase the load capacity and durability for the drive tooth side.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Involute Gear Analysis and Tooth Profile Generation Using Working Model 2D
    AC 2008-1325: INTERACTIVE INVOLUTE GEAR ANALYSIS AND TOOTH PROFILE GENERATION USING WORKING MODEL 2D Petru-Aurelian Simionescu, University of Alabama at Birmingham Petru-Aurelian Simionescu is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Alabama at Birmingham. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of Dynamics, Vibrations, Optimal design of mechanical systems, Mechanisms and Robotics, CAD and Computer Graphics. Page 13.781.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Interactive Involute Gear Analysis and Tooth Profile Generation using Working Model 2D Abstract Working Model 2D (WM 2D) is a powerful, easy to use planar multibody software that has been adopted by many instructors teaching Statics, Dynamics, Mechanisms, Machine Design, as well as by practicing engineers. Its programming and import-export capabilities facilitate simulating the motion of complex shape bodies subject to constraints. In this paper a number of WM 2D applications will be described that allow students to understand the basics properties of involute- gears and how they are manufactured. Other applications allow students to study the kinematics of planetary gears trains, which is known to be less intuitive than that of fix-axle transmissions. Introduction There are numerous reports on the use of Working Model 2D in teaching Mechanical Engineering disciplines, including Statics, Dynamics, Mechanisms, Vibrations, Controls and Machine Design1-9. Working Model 2D (WM 2D), currently available form Design Simulation Technologies10, is a planar multibody software, capable of performing kinematic and dynamic simulation of interconnected bodies subject to a variety of constraints. The versatility of the software is given by its geometry and data import/export capabilities, and scripting through formula and WM Basic language system.
    [Show full text]
  • VIRTUAL HOBBING E. BERGSETH Department of Machine Design, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SUMMARY Hobbing Is a Widely Used Machining Proc
    VIRTUAL HOBBING E. BERGSETH Department of Machine Design, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SUMMARY Hobbing is a widely used machining process to generate high precision external spur and helical gears. The life of the hob is determined by wear and other surface damage. In this report, a CAD approach is used to simulate the machining process of a gear tooth slot. Incremental removal of material is achieved by identifying contact lines. The paper presents an example of spur gear generation by means of an unworn and a worn hob. The two CAD-generated gear surfaces are compared and showed form deviations. Keywords: gear machining, CAD, simulation 1 INTRODUCTION analysis of the tolerances applied to gears, each step in the manufacturing process must be optimized. Better The quality and cost of high precision gears are aspects understanding of the geometrical variations would which are constantly of interest. Demands stemming facilitate tolerance decisions, and make it easier to from increasing environmental awareness, such as meet new demands. lower noise and improved gear efficiency, are added to traditional demands to create (MackAldener [1]) a Gear manufacturing consists of several operations; challenging task for both manufacturers and designers. table 1 shows an example of a gear manufacturing To be able to adjust to these demands, a design must be sequence for high precision external spur or helical robust; that is, it must deliver the target performance gears. regardless of any uncontrollable variations, for example manufacturing variations. Manufacturing variations can include geometrical variations caused by imperfections in the manufacturing process, for example, wear of tools. The geometrical deviations of each part must be limited by tolerances in order to ensure that the functional requirements are met.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kinematics of Conical Involute Gear Hobbing
    The Kinematics of Conical Involute Gear Hobbing Carlo Innocenti (This article fi rst appeared in the proceedings of IMECE2007, The technical literature contains plenty of information the 2007 ASME International Mechanical Engineering regarding the tooth fl ank geometry (Refs. 8–9) and the setting Congress and Exposition, November 11–15, 2007, Seattle, of a hobbing machine in order to generate a beveloid gear Washington, USA. It is reprinted here with permission.) (Refs. 10–15). Unfortunately, the formalism usually adopted makes determination of the hobbing parameters a rather involved process, mainly because the geometry of a beveloid Management Summary gear is customarily—though ineffi ciently—specifi ed by It is the intent of this presentation to determine all rigid-body positions of two conical involutes that resorting to the relative placement of the gear with respect mesh together, with no backlash. That information to the standard rack cutter that would generate the gear, even then serves to provide a simple, general approach in if the gear is to be generated by a different cutting tool. To arriving at two key setting parameters for a hobbing make things worse, some of the cited papers on beveloid gear machine when cutting a conical (beveloid) gear. hobbing are hard reading due to printing errors in formulae A numerical example will show application of the and fi gures. presented results in a case study scenario. Conical This paper presents an original method to compute the involute gears are commonly seen in gearboxes parameters that defi ne the relative movement of a hob with for medium-size marine applications—onboard respect to the beveloid gear being generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gears Dr.-Ing
    TECHNICAL Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gears Dr.-Ing. Burkhard Pinnekamp, Dr.-Ing. Michael Heider, and M.Sc. Andreas Beinstingel Introduction Besides power density, reliability and efficiency, noise is always an important criterion for a successful gear design. In many theoretical and experimental in- vestigations and papers, the influences and potential remedies were discussed. For example, in (Ref. 6) the importance of a large overlap ratio, achieved by a large helix angle is described as the most important factor for reducing gear noise. In planetary gear systems of high power density and high gear ratio, heli- cal gears create undesirable tilting mo- ments on the planet gears; therefore, Figure 1 Noise: generation, transmission and radiation. spur gears are still preferred for plan- etary gears — a special challenge with respect to noise. Specifically, the dif- ferent behavior of planetary gears with sequential and symmetric gear mesh is explained in this paper. As described (Ref. 10), the variable mesh stiffness along the path of con- tact in the tooth contact leads to oscil- lating forces on the shafts and bearings, which are transmitted to the casing. The casing vibrations radiate airborne noise (Fig. 1). The influence of tooth geometry on the excitation behavior is determined by the geometry parameters, such as Figure 2 Contributions to single tooth contact deflection along path of contact (Source: FZG TU Munich). profile and overlap ratios, flank modifi- cations and manufacturing deviations. For design to low noise emission, the knowledge of the elastic and dynamic behavior of the transmission system and the excitation mechanisms of the gear mesh is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Performance Analysis of RV Reducers Influenced by Profile
    applied sciences Article Transmission Performance Analysis of RV Reducers Influenced by Profile Modification and Load Hui Wang, Zhao-Yao Shi *, Bo Yu and Hang Xu Beijing Engineering Research Center of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, College of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Electronics Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; [email protected] (H.W.); [email protected] (B.Y.); [email protected] (H.X.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-139-1030-7299 Received: 31 August 2019; Accepted: 25 September 2019; Published: 1 October 2019 Featured Application: A new multi-tooth contact model proposed in this study provides an effective method to determine the optimal profile modification curves to improve transmission performance of RV reducers. Abstract: RV reducers contain multi-tooth contact characteristics, with high-impact resistance and a small backlash, and are widely used in precision transmissions, such as robot joints. The main parameters affecting the transmission performance include torsional stiffness and transmission errors (TEs). However, a cycloid tooth profile modification has a significant influence on the transmission accuracy and torsional stiffness of an RV reducer. It is important to study the multi-tooth contact characteristics caused by modifying the cycloid profile. The contact force is calculated using a single contact stiffness, inevitably affecting the accuracy of the result. Thus, a new multi-tooth contact model and a TE model of an RV reducer are proposed by dividing the contact area into several differential elements. A comparison of the contact force obtained using the finite element method and the test results of an RV reducer prototype validates the proposed models.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Information Spur Gears Gear Nomenclature
    Engineering Information Spur Gears Gear Nomenclature ADDENDUM (a) is the height by which a tooth projects GEAR is a machine part with gear teeth. When two gears beyond the pitch circle or pitch line. run together, the one with the larger number of teeth is called the gear. BASE DIAMETER (Db) is the diameter of the base cylinder from which the involute portion of a tooth profile is generated. HUB DIAMETER is outside diameter of a gear, sprocket or coupling hub. BACKLASH (B) is the amount by which the width of a tooth space exceeds the thickness of the engaging tooth on the HUB PROJECTION is the distance the hub extends beyond pitch circles. As actually indicated by measuring devices, the gear face. backlash may be determined variously in the transverse, normal, or axial-planes, and either in the direction of the pitch INVOLUTE TEETH of spur gears, helical gears and worms circles or on the line of action. Such measurements should be are those in which the active portion of the profile in the corrected to corresponding values on transverse pitch circles transverse plane is the involute of a circle. for general comparisons. LONG- AND SHORT-ADDENDUM TEETH are those of BORE LENGTH is the total length through a gear, sprocket, engaging gears (on a standard designed center distance) or coupling bore. one of which has a long addendum and the other has a short addendum. CIRCULAR PITCH (p) is the distance along the pitch circle or pitch line between corresponding profiles of adjacent teeth. KEYWAY is the machined groove running the length of the bore.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Designs and Geometry for Mechanical Gearing
    Novel Designs and Geometry for Mechanical Gearing by Erasmo Chiappetta School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics Oxford Brookes University In collaboration with Norbar Torque Tools ltd., UK. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Oxford Brookes University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Abstract This thesis presents quasi-static Finite Element Methods for the analysis of the stress state occurring in a pair of loaded spur gears and aims to further research the effect of tooth profile modifications on the mechanical performance of a mating gear pair. The investigation is then extended to epicyclic transmissions as they are considered the most viable solution when the transmission of high torque level within a compact volume is required. Since, for the current study, only low speed conditions are considered, dynamic loads do not play a crucial role. Vibrations and the resulting noise might be considered negligible and consequently the design process is dictated entirely by the stress state occurring on the mating components. Gear load carrying capacity is limited by maximum contact and bending stress and their correlated failure modes. Consequently, the occurring stress state is the main criteria to characterise the load carrying capacity of a gear system. Contact and bending stresses are evaluated for multiple positions over a mesh cycle of a contacting tooth pair in order to consider the stress fluctuation as consequence of the alternation of single and double pairs of teeth in contact. The influence of gear geometrical proportions on mechanical properties of gears in mesh is studied thoroughly by means of the definition of a domain of feasible combination of geometrical parameters in order to deconstruct the well-established gear design process based on rating standards and base the defined gear geometry on operational and manufacturing constraints only.
    [Show full text]
  • Rogue Rotary
    2017 Rogue Rotary MODULAR ROBOTIC ROTARY JOINT DESIGN SEAN MURPHY JACOB TRIPLET TYLER RIESSEN Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Problem Statement ....................................................................................................................... 4 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Researching the Problem .............................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Researching Existing Solutions ...................................................................................................... 8 3 Objectives............................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Modularity ................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Time to assemble new configuration: ................................................................................. 11 3.1.2 Time to re-configure program: ........................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Dynamic Range: .................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Target
    [Show full text]