Gears & Gear Drives
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gears and Gearing Part 1 Types of Gears Types of Gears
Gears and Gearing Part 1 Types of Gears Types of Gears Spur Helical Bevel Worm Nomenclature of Spur-Gear Teeth Fig. 13–5 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Rack A rack is a spur gear with an pitch diameter of infinity. The sides of the teeth are straight lines making an angle to the line of centers equal to the pressure angle. Fig. 13–13 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Tooth Size, Diameter, Number of Teeth Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Tooth Sizes in General Industrial Use Table 13–2 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design How an Involute Gear Profile is constructed A1B1=A1A0, A2B2=2 A1A0 , etc Pressure Angle Φ has the values of 20° or 25 ° 14.5 ° has also been used. Gear profile is constructed from the base circle. Then additional clearance are given. Relation of Base Circle to Pressure Angle Fig. 13–10 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Standardized Tooth Systems: AGMA Standard Common pressure angles f : 20º and 25º Older pressure angle: 14 ½º Common face width: 35p F p p P 35 F PP Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Gear Sources • Boston Gear • Martin Sprocket • W. M. Berg • Stock Drive Products …. Numerous others Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Conjugate Action When surfaces roll/slide against each other and produce constant angular velocity ratio, they are said to have conjugate action. Can be accomplished if instant center of velocity between the two bodies remains stationary between the grounded instant centers. Fig. 13–6 Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design Fundamental Law of Gearing: The common normal of the tooth profiles at all points within the mesh must always pass through a fixed point on the line of the centers called pitch point. -
Back to Basics
BACK TO BASICS. • • Gear Design National Broach and Machine Division ,of Lear Siegler, Inc. A gear can be defined as a toothed wheel which, when meshed with another toothed wheel with similar configura- tion, will transmit rotation from one shaft to another. Depending upon the type and accuracy of motion desired, the gears and the profiles of the gear teeth can be of almost any form. Gears come in all shapes and sizes from square to circular, elliptical to conical and from as small as a pinhead to as large asa house. They are used to provide positive transmis- sion of both motion and power. Most generally, gear teeth are equally spaced around the periphery of the gear. The original gear teeth were wooden pegs driven into the periphery of wooden wheels and driven by other wooden Fig. 1-2- The common normal of cycloidal gears is a. curve which varies wheels of similar construction ..As man's progress in the use from a maximum inclination with respect to the common tangent at the of gears, and the form of the gear teeth changed to suit the pitch point to coincidence with the direction of this tangent. For cycloidal gears rotating as shown here. the arc B'P is theArc of Approach, and the all; application. The contacting sides or profiles of the teeth PA, the Arc of Recess. changed in shape until eventually they became parts of regular curves which were easily defined. norma] of cydoidal gears isa curve, Fig. 1-2, which is not of To obtain correct tooth action, (constant instantaneous a fixed direction, but varies from. -
Design and Control of a Large Modular Robot Hexapod
Design and Control of a Large Modular Robot Hexapod Matt Martone CMU-RI-TR-19-79 November 22, 2019 The Robotics Institute School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Thesis Committee: Howie Choset, chair Matt Travers Aaron Johnson Julian Whitman Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Robotics. Copyright © 2019 Matt Martone. All rights reserved. To all my mentors: past and future iv Abstract Legged robotic systems have made great strides in recent years, but unlike wheeled robots, limbed locomotion does not scale well. Long legs demand huge torques, driving up actuator size and onboard battery mass. This relationship results in massive structures that lack the safety, portabil- ity, and controllability of their smaller limbed counterparts. Innovative transmission design paired with unconventional controller paradigms are the keys to breaking this trend. The Titan 6 project endeavors to build a set of self-sufficient modular joints unified by a novel control architecture to create a spiderlike robot with two-meter legs that is robust, field- repairable, and an order of magnitude lighter than similarly sized systems. This thesis explores how we transformed desired behaviors into a set of workable design constraints, discusses our prototypes in the context of the project and the field, describes how our controller leverages compliance to improve stability, and delves into the electromechanical designs for these modular actuators that enable Titan 6 to be both light and strong. v vi Acknowledgments This work was made possible by a huge group of people who taught and supported me throughout my graduate studies and my time at Carnegie Mellon as a whole. -
Design of Involute Spur Gears with Asymmetric Teeth & Direct Gear
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 1 Issue 6, August - 2012 Design of Involute Spur Gears with Asymmetric teeth & Direct gear Design G. Gowtham krishna 1, K. Srinvas2,M.Suresh3 1.P.G.student,Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, DVR AND DHM college of Engineering and technology, Kanchikacherla, 521180,Krishna dt, A.P. 2.Associat.professor, Dept of Mechanical Engineering,DVR AND DHM college of Engineering and technology, Kanchikacherla, 521180,Krishna dt, A.P. 3.P.G.student,Dept. of Mechanical Engineering,BEC,Bapatla,Guntur,A.P. Abstract-- Design of gears with asymmetric teeth that production. • Gear grinding is adaptable to custom tooth shapes. enables to increase load capacity, reduce weight, size and • Metal and plastic gear molding cost largely does not depend vibration level. standard tool parameters and uses nonstandard on tooth shape. This article presents the direct gear design tooth shapes to provide required performance for a particular method, which separates gear geometry definition from tool custom application. This makes finite element analysis (FEA) selection, to achieve the best possible performance for a more preferable than the Lewis equation for bending stress particular product and application. definition. This paper does not describe the FEA application for comprehensive stress analysis of the gear teeth. It sents the engineering method for bending stress balance and minimization. Involute gear Introduction Conventional involute spur gears are designed with symmetric tooth side surfaces . It is well known that the conditions of load and meshing are different for drive and coast tooth's side. Application of asymmetric tooth side surfaces enables to increase the load capacity and durability for the drive tooth side. -
Interactive Involute Gear Analysis and Tooth Profile Generation Using Working Model 2D
AC 2008-1325: INTERACTIVE INVOLUTE GEAR ANALYSIS AND TOOTH PROFILE GENERATION USING WORKING MODEL 2D Petru-Aurelian Simionescu, University of Alabama at Birmingham Petru-Aurelian Simionescu is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Alabama at Birmingham. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of Dynamics, Vibrations, Optimal design of mechanical systems, Mechanisms and Robotics, CAD and Computer Graphics. Page 13.781.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Interactive Involute Gear Analysis and Tooth Profile Generation using Working Model 2D Abstract Working Model 2D (WM 2D) is a powerful, easy to use planar multibody software that has been adopted by many instructors teaching Statics, Dynamics, Mechanisms, Machine Design, as well as by practicing engineers. Its programming and import-export capabilities facilitate simulating the motion of complex shape bodies subject to constraints. In this paper a number of WM 2D applications will be described that allow students to understand the basics properties of involute- gears and how they are manufactured. Other applications allow students to study the kinematics of planetary gears trains, which is known to be less intuitive than that of fix-axle transmissions. Introduction There are numerous reports on the use of Working Model 2D in teaching Mechanical Engineering disciplines, including Statics, Dynamics, Mechanisms, Vibrations, Controls and Machine Design1-9. Working Model 2D (WM 2D), currently available form Design Simulation Technologies10, is a planar multibody software, capable of performing kinematic and dynamic simulation of interconnected bodies subject to a variety of constraints. The versatility of the software is given by its geometry and data import/export capabilities, and scripting through formula and WM Basic language system. -
VIRTUAL HOBBING E. BERGSETH Department of Machine Design, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SUMMARY Hobbing Is a Widely Used Machining Proc
VIRTUAL HOBBING E. BERGSETH Department of Machine Design, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SUMMARY Hobbing is a widely used machining process to generate high precision external spur and helical gears. The life of the hob is determined by wear and other surface damage. In this report, a CAD approach is used to simulate the machining process of a gear tooth slot. Incremental removal of material is achieved by identifying contact lines. The paper presents an example of spur gear generation by means of an unworn and a worn hob. The two CAD-generated gear surfaces are compared and showed form deviations. Keywords: gear machining, CAD, simulation 1 INTRODUCTION analysis of the tolerances applied to gears, each step in the manufacturing process must be optimized. Better The quality and cost of high precision gears are aspects understanding of the geometrical variations would which are constantly of interest. Demands stemming facilitate tolerance decisions, and make it easier to from increasing environmental awareness, such as meet new demands. lower noise and improved gear efficiency, are added to traditional demands to create (MackAldener [1]) a Gear manufacturing consists of several operations; challenging task for both manufacturers and designers. table 1 shows an example of a gear manufacturing To be able to adjust to these demands, a design must be sequence for high precision external spur or helical robust; that is, it must deliver the target performance gears. regardless of any uncontrollable variations, for example manufacturing variations. Manufacturing variations can include geometrical variations caused by imperfections in the manufacturing process, for example, wear of tools. The geometrical deviations of each part must be limited by tolerances in order to ensure that the functional requirements are met. -
The Kinematics of Conical Involute Gear Hobbing
The Kinematics of Conical Involute Gear Hobbing Carlo Innocenti (This article fi rst appeared in the proceedings of IMECE2007, The technical literature contains plenty of information the 2007 ASME International Mechanical Engineering regarding the tooth fl ank geometry (Refs. 8–9) and the setting Congress and Exposition, November 11–15, 2007, Seattle, of a hobbing machine in order to generate a beveloid gear Washington, USA. It is reprinted here with permission.) (Refs. 10–15). Unfortunately, the formalism usually adopted makes determination of the hobbing parameters a rather involved process, mainly because the geometry of a beveloid Management Summary gear is customarily—though ineffi ciently—specifi ed by It is the intent of this presentation to determine all rigid-body positions of two conical involutes that resorting to the relative placement of the gear with respect mesh together, with no backlash. That information to the standard rack cutter that would generate the gear, even then serves to provide a simple, general approach in if the gear is to be generated by a different cutting tool. To arriving at two key setting parameters for a hobbing make things worse, some of the cited papers on beveloid gear machine when cutting a conical (beveloid) gear. hobbing are hard reading due to printing errors in formulae A numerical example will show application of the and fi gures. presented results in a case study scenario. Conical This paper presents an original method to compute the involute gears are commonly seen in gearboxes parameters that defi ne the relative movement of a hob with for medium-size marine applications—onboard respect to the beveloid gear being generated. -
Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gears Dr.-Ing
TECHNICAL Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gears Dr.-Ing. Burkhard Pinnekamp, Dr.-Ing. Michael Heider, and M.Sc. Andreas Beinstingel Introduction Besides power density, reliability and efficiency, noise is always an important criterion for a successful gear design. In many theoretical and experimental in- vestigations and papers, the influences and potential remedies were discussed. For example, in (Ref. 6) the importance of a large overlap ratio, achieved by a large helix angle is described as the most important factor for reducing gear noise. In planetary gear systems of high power density and high gear ratio, heli- cal gears create undesirable tilting mo- ments on the planet gears; therefore, Figure 1 Noise: generation, transmission and radiation. spur gears are still preferred for plan- etary gears — a special challenge with respect to noise. Specifically, the dif- ferent behavior of planetary gears with sequential and symmetric gear mesh is explained in this paper. As described (Ref. 10), the variable mesh stiffness along the path of con- tact in the tooth contact leads to oscil- lating forces on the shafts and bearings, which are transmitted to the casing. The casing vibrations radiate airborne noise (Fig. 1). The influence of tooth geometry on the excitation behavior is determined by the geometry parameters, such as Figure 2 Contributions to single tooth contact deflection along path of contact (Source: FZG TU Munich). profile and overlap ratios, flank modifi- cations and manufacturing deviations. For design to low noise emission, the knowledge of the elastic and dynamic behavior of the transmission system and the excitation mechanisms of the gear mesh is required. -
Transmission Performance Analysis of RV Reducers Influenced by Profile
applied sciences Article Transmission Performance Analysis of RV Reducers Influenced by Profile Modification and Load Hui Wang, Zhao-Yao Shi *, Bo Yu and Hang Xu Beijing Engineering Research Center of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, College of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Electronics Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; [email protected] (H.W.); [email protected] (B.Y.); [email protected] (H.X.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-139-1030-7299 Received: 31 August 2019; Accepted: 25 September 2019; Published: 1 October 2019 Featured Application: A new multi-tooth contact model proposed in this study provides an effective method to determine the optimal profile modification curves to improve transmission performance of RV reducers. Abstract: RV reducers contain multi-tooth contact characteristics, with high-impact resistance and a small backlash, and are widely used in precision transmissions, such as robot joints. The main parameters affecting the transmission performance include torsional stiffness and transmission errors (TEs). However, a cycloid tooth profile modification has a significant influence on the transmission accuracy and torsional stiffness of an RV reducer. It is important to study the multi-tooth contact characteristics caused by modifying the cycloid profile. The contact force is calculated using a single contact stiffness, inevitably affecting the accuracy of the result. Thus, a new multi-tooth contact model and a TE model of an RV reducer are proposed by dividing the contact area into several differential elements. A comparison of the contact force obtained using the finite element method and the test results of an RV reducer prototype validates the proposed models. -
Engineering Information Spur Gears Gear Nomenclature
Engineering Information Spur Gears Gear Nomenclature ADDENDUM (a) is the height by which a tooth projects GEAR is a machine part with gear teeth. When two gears beyond the pitch circle or pitch line. run together, the one with the larger number of teeth is called the gear. BASE DIAMETER (Db) is the diameter of the base cylinder from which the involute portion of a tooth profile is generated. HUB DIAMETER is outside diameter of a gear, sprocket or coupling hub. BACKLASH (B) is the amount by which the width of a tooth space exceeds the thickness of the engaging tooth on the HUB PROJECTION is the distance the hub extends beyond pitch circles. As actually indicated by measuring devices, the gear face. backlash may be determined variously in the transverse, normal, or axial-planes, and either in the direction of the pitch INVOLUTE TEETH of spur gears, helical gears and worms circles or on the line of action. Such measurements should be are those in which the active portion of the profile in the corrected to corresponding values on transverse pitch circles transverse plane is the involute of a circle. for general comparisons. LONG- AND SHORT-ADDENDUM TEETH are those of BORE LENGTH is the total length through a gear, sprocket, engaging gears (on a standard designed center distance) or coupling bore. one of which has a long addendum and the other has a short addendum. CIRCULAR PITCH (p) is the distance along the pitch circle or pitch line between corresponding profiles of adjacent teeth. KEYWAY is the machined groove running the length of the bore. -
Novel Designs and Geometry for Mechanical Gearing
Novel Designs and Geometry for Mechanical Gearing by Erasmo Chiappetta School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics Oxford Brookes University In collaboration with Norbar Torque Tools ltd., UK. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Oxford Brookes University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Abstract This thesis presents quasi-static Finite Element Methods for the analysis of the stress state occurring in a pair of loaded spur gears and aims to further research the effect of tooth profile modifications on the mechanical performance of a mating gear pair. The investigation is then extended to epicyclic transmissions as they are considered the most viable solution when the transmission of high torque level within a compact volume is required. Since, for the current study, only low speed conditions are considered, dynamic loads do not play a crucial role. Vibrations and the resulting noise might be considered negligible and consequently the design process is dictated entirely by the stress state occurring on the mating components. Gear load carrying capacity is limited by maximum contact and bending stress and their correlated failure modes. Consequently, the occurring stress state is the main criteria to characterise the load carrying capacity of a gear system. Contact and bending stresses are evaluated for multiple positions over a mesh cycle of a contacting tooth pair in order to consider the stress fluctuation as consequence of the alternation of single and double pairs of teeth in contact. The influence of gear geometrical proportions on mechanical properties of gears in mesh is studied thoroughly by means of the definition of a domain of feasible combination of geometrical parameters in order to deconstruct the well-established gear design process based on rating standards and base the defined gear geometry on operational and manufacturing constraints only. -
Rogue Rotary
2017 Rogue Rotary MODULAR ROBOTIC ROTARY JOINT DESIGN SEAN MURPHY JACOB TRIPLET TYLER RIESSEN Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Problem Statement ....................................................................................................................... 4 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Researching the Problem .............................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Researching Existing Solutions ...................................................................................................... 8 3 Objectives............................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Modularity ................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Time to assemble new configuration: ................................................................................. 11 3.1.2 Time to re-configure program: ........................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Dynamic Range: .................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Target