The Global Magnitude and Implications of Legal and Illegal Wildlife Trade in China
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The global magnitude and implications of legal and illegal wildlife trade in China Y UNBO J IAO and T IEN M ING L EE Abstract China is one of the largest consumer markets in is a major component of this global commerce. China is the international legal and illegal wildlife trade. An increas- a major supply source (Nijman, ; Petrossian et al., ing demand for wildlife and wildlife products is threaten- ), but since the s has become one of the world’s ing biodiversity, both within China and in other countries largest consumers of wildlife and wildlife products (Zhou where wildlife destined for the Chinese market is being & Jiang, ; UNODC, ), as a result of economic sourced. We analysed official data on legal imports of development and increasing consumer affluence. China’s CITES-listed species in five vertebrate classes (mammals, demand for wildlife appears to continue to expand as its af- reptiles, amphibians, birds and fish), and on enforcement fluent, urban population increases, and the culture of wild- seizures of illegally traded wildlife, during –. This life consumption spreads from the south to other parts of is the first study that collates and analyses publicly available the country (Zhang et al., ; Zhang & Yin, ). data on China’s legal and illegal wildlife trade and considers This demand drives unsustainable and often illegal a broad range of species. Specifically, we estimated the scale harvest and trade, threatening biological diversity within and scope of the legal and illegal wildlife trade, quantified and beyond China’s borders. The Red List of China’s the diversity of species involved, and identified the major Biodiversity (MEE & CAS, ) shows that % of the trading partners, hotspots and routes associated with illegal , Chinese vertebrate species that have been assessed trade. Our findings show that substantial quantities of wild- using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria are catego- life have been extracted globally for the Chinese market: rized as threatened. Overexploitation for food and use in during – over . million whole-organism equiva- traditional Chinese medicine is the most pervasive threat lents and million kg of derivatives of legally traded wildlife, to Chinese vertebrates (MEE & CAS, ). As wildlife plus over , illegally traded animals (alive and dead) populations are depleted within China, sourcing of com- and a substantial amount of animal body parts and prod- mercially valuable species has shifted to neighbouring coun- ucts, were imported into China. Although measures to tries in Asia, and to Africa (UNODC, ). As a result, reduce demand and alleviate poverty are crucial to curb the wild populations of highly coveted species, includ- unsustainable and illegal wildlife trade in the longer term, ing pangolins (Challender et al., ), Asian large felids China’s wildlife regulators and enforcers must take urgent (Lynam, ; Maheshwari & Niraj, ), bears (Garshelis measures to disrupt the supply chains from source to market. & Steinmetz, ), rhinoceroses and elephants (UNEP et al., ;Milliken,), and tortoises and freshwater tur- Keywords Biodiversity conservation, China, CITES, enforce- tles (Nijman & Shepherd, ) have experienced severe de- ment, illegal wildlife trade, regulation, wildlife products clines in China’s main source countries. As highlighted by Supplementary material for this article is available at the global outbreak of COVID- (WHO, ), this legal doi.org/./S and illegal wildlife trade threatens not only biodiversity but also human health, by facilitating the transmission of zoo- notic diseases from wild animals to people. Prior analyses of legal and illegal wildlife trade in China Introduction focused primarily on high-value species or wildlife products such as tigers (Wong, ), elephant ivory (Gao & Clark, nternational wildlife trade, whether legal or illegal, is a ) or bear bile (Foley et al., ), or on trade hotspots Iglobal business, with a value of traded and smuggled of these species and products such as Yunnan (Yi et al., goods of USD billions per year (Harfoot et al., ; ), Guangxi (Jiang et al., ) or Guangdong (Chow ‘ t Sas-Rolfes et al., ). Wildlife trade to and from China et al., ). There is a paucity of empirical studies that con- sider both the legal and illegal wildlife trade in the country YUNBO JIAO (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-6357) School as a whole. of Law, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 West Xingang Road, Guangzhou 510275, Here, we aim to provide an evidence-based overview of China. E-mail [email protected] China’s role in transnational wildlife trade through an TIEN MING LEE ( orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-9358) School of Life Sciences, examination of empirical data on legal wildlife trade and en- School of Ecology and State Key Laboratory of Biological Control, Sun Yat- – sen University, Guangzhou, China forcement seizures of illegally traded wildlife during Received December . Revision requested March . Specifically, we examined: ( ) the scale and scope of Accepted August . China’s legal and illegal trade, () the number and diversity This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, Downloadeddistribution, from https://www.cambridge.org/core and reproduction in any medium,. IP address: provided 170.106.40.139 the original work, on is 25 properly Sep 2021 cited. at 00:50:52, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/termsOryx, Page 1 of 8 © The Author(s),. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320000800 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605320000800 2 Y. Jiao and T. M. Lee of species involved, () the major trading partners and Material ). With respect to the type of traded goods, () the hotspots and routes associated with China’s illegal China’s imports were dominated by live animals and skins, trade. This information can aid wildlife management au- accounting for and % of the total imports, respectively. thorities in China and source countries in improving their regulation of legal trade, and help cross-border wildlife law enforcement agencies formulate more tailored interception Most imported species A total of vertebrate species – and prevention strategies to disrupt illegal trade. were imported into China during . Of those, species were listed on CITES Appendix I, on Appendix II and on Appendix III. Overall, a relatively Methods small number of species accounted for the majority of imported wildlife (e.g. the brown caiman Caiman crocodilus We gathered data from two sources. For legal trade, we fuscus and the oriental ratsnake Ptyas mucosus; Supple- queried the CITES trade database (CITES, ) for all mentary Material ). Within the taxonomic groups, the ’ records of China s imports of five vertebrate classes (mam- most traded species constituted % of the imports of – mals, reptiles, amphibians, birds and fish) during mammals, % of reptile imports, % of bird imports (data downloaded on December ). This database has and nearly all fish imports. Ten species belonging to mul- been used in previous studies to examine trade of a selected tiple taxonomic groups accounted for % of all imports range of taxonomic groups or species at different geograph- of live animals, and five reptilian species together accounted ical scales (e.g. Jiang et al., ; Li & Jiang, ; Foster et al., for % of all imports of skins. ), but ours is the first to use it to quantify China’s global imports of all CITES-listed vertebrate species. For data on illegal trade, we collated information re- Purpose of imported wildlife The intended purpose of ported by TRAFFIC () on seizures of illegally traded legally imported wildlife varied between taxonomic groups wildlife for the same time period, including cases that (Supplementary Table , Supplementary Material ). Mam- involved China as the source, transit point or final desti- mals were imported primarily for the fur trade, and rep- nation of the seized wildlife, and seizure incidents occur- tiles for their skin, and for human consumption, traditional ring within and outside China (see Supplementary Material Chinese medicine and the pet trade. Birds were imported pri- for details). marily for the pet trade. Parrots (Psittaciformes), particularly members of the Psittacidae family, which are often traded as caged birds in China (Li & Jiang, ), were the most im- Results ported taxon. Fish trade was dominanted by the Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii and the Asian arowana Scleropages Legal trade formosus, which were introduced into China mainly for commercial captive breeding for human consumption (Chen Scale of China’s legal trade Our analysis of , CITES et al., ) and ornamental use (Tian et al., ), respectively. trade records showed that during –, an estimat- ed . million whole-organism equivalents of wildlife (including . million live animals) and million kg of wild- Wild-caught vs captive-bred imports Captive-bred animals ’ life derivatives were legally imported into China. The mean comprised on average over half ( %) of China s annual annual import volume in whole-organism equivalents was imports for most of the study period (Supplementary . million, accounting for c. % of the legitimate global Fig. a, Supplementary Material ). At the level of taxo- wildlife imports, which were estimated at million per nomic groups, mammals were mostly wild-caught ( %of – year (Harfoot