Law, Spatiality and the Tshwane Urban Space
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Law, Spatiality and the Tshwane Urban Space by Isolde de Villiers Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree LLD (Doctor Legum) In the Faculty of Law University of Pretoria Supervisor: Prof K. van Marle July 2017 © University of Pretoria Acknowledgement This thesis is the product of various networks of social relationships. To the enabling and supportive relations I would like to offer a sincere thank you. Firstly to my supervisor, Karin van Marle, who has introduced me to Jurisprudence and academia. Thank you for your patience, guidance, collegiality and support, but above all for opening up different time-spaces for thinking, contesting, learning and growing. Thank you for showing me the way, it has been an interesting and rewarding journey thus far. Thank you to the department of Jurisprudence at the University of Pretoria for being my academic home, for allowing me the space and time to work on this project, and for various conferences and research seminars at which I could explore and test the ideas in this work. Thank you to Danie Brand for a sharp editing eye. To my parents, Pieter and Joey and my siblings Rhene, Milada and JacquesJ, thank you for your interest in my project, your love and understanding. Thank you to various friends for your belief in me and for supplying welcome distractions. To Oloff, thank you for the ideas and for providing an office with a view during several stretches of research leave. Thank you to Manisha and Nthombi and the other inhabitants of Schubart Park for showing me the layered narratives of your former home. © University of Pretoria Summary This project focuses on the relationship between law and space. In the South African context, apartheid can be understood as a legal system that regulated material space. This system produced social relations and conditions that remain, despite the abolition of the apartheid legal system. Spatial justice captures the relationship between law and space. Looking at law from the perspective of spatial justice provides a vocabulary for explaining how spaces (as social relations) remain after laws have gone. Following feminist geographer Doreen Massey, I call for law to recognise relational space. The city of Tshwane’s lawscape provides me with three instantiations through which to investigate the spatial justice discourse. The first chapter considers the case of Schubart Park, a high-rise complex in the inner city of Tshwane. An estimated 700 families were evicted from the building complex in 2011. The constitutional court, one year later, ordered the re-instatement of the inhabitants, but the buildings still stand empty. The second chapter focuses on the city of Tshwane street names case. During 2012, a number of street names across the city were changed. The constitutional court, in 2016, handed down a judgment that brings to the surface the notions of belonging in the city. The third chapter traces the grand narrative of the municipality by analysing the mayoral speeches of the past five years and the Tshwane 2055 plan. This project hopes to contribute to the vocabulary of spatiality and spatial justice from a post-apartheid South African perspective and in particular from the vantage point of the administrative capital. © University of Pretoria Declaration of originality I, Isolde de Villiers with student number 23222795, understand what plagiarism is and I am aware of the University’s policy in this regard. I declare that this thesis is my own original work. Where other people’s work has been used, this has been properly acknowledged and referenced in accordance with departmental requirements. I have not used work previously produced by another student or any other person to hand in as my own. © University of Pretoria Contents Law, Spatiality and the Tshwane Urban Space ..................................................... 1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 2 Declaration of originality ............................................................................................. 4 Contents .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 ................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 1.1. Research problem ........................................................................................ 5 1.2. City of Tshwane/ Pretoria.............................................................................. 6 1.3. The spatial turn (in law) ................................................................................ 9 1.4. Leibniz and Lefebvre: the importance of relative space .............................. 12 1.5. Approach and methodology ........................................................................ 18 1.6. Research questions and chapter overview ................................................. 20 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................................. 23 Schubart Park: women’s voices and the right to the city .......................................... 23 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 23 2.2. Schubart Park ................................................................................................ 24 2.2.1. The early history and construction of the apartment complex .................. 24 2.2.2. Court cases in the North Gauteng high court and the constitutional court 28 2.3. The right to the city ........................................................................................ 35 2.3.1. A cry and a demand ................................................................................. 36 2.3.2. The right to difference and the right to urban life ..................................... 39 2.4. Inhabitance and Habitat ................................................................................ 49 2.4.1. Dwelling and the shift from habitat to inhabitance .................................... 50 2.4.2. The politics of inhabitance and the violence of habitat ............................. 55 2.5. Schubart Park as a gendered space .............................................................. 57 1 © University of Pretoria 2.5.1. Throwntogetherness as gendered space ................................................. 60 2.5.2. Auntie N and Mama R ............................................................................. 65 2.5.3. Relational space and rights as relationships ............................................ 67 2.5.4. Radical geography and/ as feminist critique ............................................ 75 2.6. The everyday as gendered and tactics as practices of everyday life ............. 77 2.6.1. Tactics and the everyday in Schubart Park.............................................. 77 2.6.2. Lefebvre De Certeau and Butler on the everyday .................................... 78 2.6.3. Maphango ................................................................................................ 81 2.7. Time-space / Space-Time and the Schubart Park case’s courts as chronotopes .............................................................................................................................. 93 2.7.1. Chronotope as timespace and courts as chronotopes ............................. 94 2.7.2. Time-space-compression....................................................................... 100 2.7.3. Pacha .................................................................................................... 101 2.8. Conclusion ................................................................................................... 102 Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................... 104 Drawing lines: street names, mapping and a sense of belonging .......................... 104 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 104 3.2. Street names: cases overview ..................................................................... 107 3.2.1. 2012 case in the North Gauteng high court ........................................... 107 3.2.2. 2013 case and 2015 appeal in the North Gauteng high court ................ 109 3.2.3. Constitutional court case........................................................................ 115 3.3. Belonging ..................................................................................................... 121 3.3.1. Belonging as a culture of place .............................................................. 122 3.3.2. A sense of belonging and/ as genius loci (spirit of place) ...................... 126 3.3.3. Belonging as home and place as fluid ................................................... 134 3.3.4. Belonging and relationality ..................................................................... 141 3.4. Mapping ....................................................................................................... 157 2 © University of Pretoria 3.4.1. The rise and power of cartography ........................................................ 158 3.4.2. Drawing lines differently – mapping, tracing, humility ...........................