( LL..4 Use Planning Division 1600 SE 190tn Ave, Ste 116 ~ Multnomah Portland OR 97233 FIRE SERVICE AGENCY a a County Ph: 503-988-3043 Fax: 503-988-3389 REVIEW multco.us/landuse
TO THE APPLICANT: Take this form to the Structural Fire Service Provider* that serves your property along with the following: all A site plan drawn to scale showing the subject property, its improvements, location of fire hydrants and driveway information; ~ ~ A floor plan of the proposed development; and l _'!:_~ NA A fire flow report from your water purveyor (if applicable) [Not applicable for Prozrties s~ b) IMCRFD#14lcustomers] J,.q!\I -... t D After the fire official signs this form, include it with your application material. Se Fire Code 2 6 Address of Site 40301 E. Larch Mountain Road. Corbett. OR 97019 Map & Tax lot: 1N-5E-30CC - Tax Lot 1600 61500 'R' number R832300010 6 R832301940 Description of Proposed Use: Spa retreat center with overnight accommodations Roof Footprint 5 175 Total Square Footage of Building (including roof projections, eaves & attached structures):s1dg Total (011 firs) u.s2s Applicant Name: Keith Daily - Emerick Architects Phone: 503-235-9400 Mailing Address: 321 SW Fourth Avenue 11200 City: Portland State: _ O_R __ Zip Code: 97204 Email: keith(llemerick-orchitects.com STRUCTURAL FIRE SERVICE AGENCY REVIEW Fire Agency completing this form: Corbett Fire Dist. 14 Date of Review 1/23/18 ~ The subject property is located within our service boundaries or is under contract. D The subject property is outside of our service boundaries and will not be providing fire protection services via contract. (Additional review is not needed.) **Access Review by Structural Fire Service Agency Providing Service** 'FL_ The proposed development is in compliance with the fire apparatus access standards of the · Oregon Fire Code standards as implemented by our agency. 0 The following access improvements must be completed prior to issuance of the building permit and be re-inspected by our agency before flammable materials are placed on the property. 0 The proposed development is not in compliance with the adopted Fire Service Agency's access standards. The proposed building/structure is required to have a fire sprinkler system installed in compliance with Section 903.1.3 (NFPA 130) of the Oregon Fire Code. Fire Official: Please sign or stamp the presented site plan & noor plan and attach it to this form. d~-;z;Y Tfrv alt!--f- / I ~nature rTitle of Fire Official See Other Side J' 3--1 EXHIBIT A.16 STRUCTURAL FIRE SERVICE AGENCY REVIEW, cont ** Fire Flow by Structural Fire Service Agency Providing Service ** The stmcture, building or addition is exempt from the fire flow standards of the OFC B-105.2. D The proposed non-commercial structure is less than 3,600 sq. ft. (including the horizontal projections of the root) and there is 1,000 gallons per minute of fire~flow available at 20 psi from public water lines. No mitigation measures are necessary. D The proposed non-commercial structure is more than 3,600 sq. ft (including the horizontal projections of the roof) and the fire-flow & flow duration at 20 psi is available from public water lines or private well and is in compliance with minimums specified in Appendix B, Table B 105.1 of the Oregon Fire Code. No mitigation measures are necessary. D The existing fire-flow & flow duration available from public water lines or private well is not adequate to serve the proposed non-commercial structure in compliance with Appendix B of the Oregon Fire Code. The following mitigation measures are necessary* and must be installed prior to occupancy or use of the structure. D A monitored fire alarm must be installed. D Class A or non-combustible roof materials must be installed. D Defensible space of30 feet around the structure/building/addition. D A defensible space of I 00 feet around the structure/building/addition due to slopes greater than20%. D A fire sprinkler system meeting Section 903.1.3 (NFPA I 3D) of' the Oregon Fire Code shall be installed. D Other ______ * The above required structural features are required by the Oregon Fire Code and shall be shown clearly on all building plans. Commercial/Industrial Buildings & Uses. ~The minimum fire flow and-flow duratio rom public water lines or private well as specified in Appendix B, Table Bl 05. l. on measures are required. 0 The minimum fire flow & flow duration is not available from public water lines or private well as specified in Appendix B, Table BI 05. l. The follo\ving mitigation measures arc required: NFPA 13 system lo be installed - nearby fire hydrant meets 1500 gpm requiremenper 2014 OFC B105 Signature & Title of Fire Official To the Fire Official· D Lantl Use Planning has determined that the proposed building will qualify as an Exempt Farm Structure antl the property owner has indicated that the building will be used solely for fonn purposes and they intend on using the provision under ORS 455 315 and will not be obtaining a building pcnnit for its construction. Multnomah County Land Use Planning ·ir.- ...""'-.· --- - - ~ I ·-...... '- - l I I I I I I 1.. HSF. LLC )> VIEW POINT INN & 0 WELLNESS CENTER 41.:~1111 E l):Ut:h r..~1::'.1ritc-d'1 ~ ;J, Ci'Jlll:A1l~ C~ ?1::'."Y :, ,,! ''\ a ,,I \ '>{ \\ \ I I \ ! I i : I I I I ! I I I ! I I • l ~ : I I I I ' I UTILITY PLAN, __ I HSF, LLC T T () VIEW POINT INN & 1:11 N 11 WELLNESS CENTER I;! 0 4030 1 I· lcn·"'.h MC;•,mlajr, Rd I --1 C•J4baP r::·R w:~i:·· 9 H I I 1111 ,,I, J, 0 \ \ -r," ' 1~ \ \ -\ N \N \ HS.F, LLC n :~11 ~ FLOOR PLAN~· 0 z ·z m f~QP_Q_S_l::D VIEW POll'JT INN & !..-"" 0 "' ';' ~ ii' ~ i'ii .. 2:: c. -n ~' WELLNESS CENTER () (1 ::: :::! "' i 40J01 E lotch M:..1tntai·1 Rd D iii Corbell. OR 97019 z 1 ~ ~ ·-n 1-~ ~~ ~ ../ n Cl a ~ ::> ~I ~ !' ' ~' ~ ~ I ~ c ~ I ·~ ,, HSF. LLC I .·J' A> )> v· H• 0 VIEW POINT INN & :5 9 "' ~ tv ~I i ~" WELLNESS CENTER i tv 40301 E Lorch Mounlain Rd. ~! ~ Corbeil, OR 97019 , __. i HSF. LLC ,.~1 F"OOR PLANS· 0 )> m f'LQl'Q.~~·~ VIEW POINT INN & ~ s"' N c WELLNESS CENTER n"' ~ 0J ~030 I E L01ch MO'Jnloin Rd. 0 !ii '.L"' Corbell. OR 97~: 9 ,; MULTNOMAH Cd tmlTY CERTIFICATIO"- OF WATER SERVICE LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Take this form to the Water District that 1600 8 .E. 190TH AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97233 serves the property. 503-988-3043 FAX 503-988-3389 ''.l!~ . •• ' www.co.multnomah.or.us/dbcs/LUT/land_use Address of Site 40301 E Larch Mtn Rd , Corbett, OR f'>::::...... Map&TaxLotNumber______-+ /_~--..::~~~~------1 N SE 30CC, #1500 & 1600 I ~ If Residential Use, Total Number of Units fa 1> . ------~~--~~-=----~-+--- Applicant's Name Jenai Fitzpatrick of Humber Design Group, Inc. Mailing Address __1_1_7_S_E_T_a--=-y_lo_r_S_tr_e_et_ , _S_ui_te_0_0_1 ______City Portland State--=0-=-R'--__Zip Code--=--97:....::2~1....;..4 ____ -TO THE APPLICANT- Approval of most land uses involving a new or expanded use or involving creation of a new parcel requires a determination that the water system is adequate. If you propose to use a public water system, deliver this form to the appropriate water district prior to making any land use application. After the water district fills in the following section and returns it to you, include this form with your application. If you will be using a private water system, complete the bottom section of this form. -TO BE COMPLETED BY A 01$TRICT OFFICAL ANO RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT- The District will provide service from a 10 inch line located south side of larch mt rd The proposed use should be required to make the following water system improvements: None There is an existing 1" service to the property Name of District Corbett Water District Name of Official_J_e_f_f_B_u_st_o __ ~ ~~i/=_(11,_,,,_&__ _ Date I 01/10/2018 Office held by Official District Manager -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT IF A PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM WILL BE USED- If you propose to use a private water system, a determination that the system is adequate must be made to satisfy Comprehensive Plan Policy 37. There are two different times that determination can be made: (1) In the initial review of your proposal if the on-site well or other form of private system is existing at the time of the land use application, OR (2) After the initial review but before issuance of a building permit when documentation is provided to the Planning Director that a water system is in place. At that time public notification will again be given which may result in a new public hearing. Describe Water Source, Including Location ______ Describe Supply of Water Available (i.e., Gallons Per Minute)______ O:\Brochures & Forms\Planning Forms EXHIBIT 7/28/2004 A.17 ~and Use Planning Division ' 1 POLICE I SHERIFF 1600 SE 190 h Ave, Ste 116 ~ Mul t nom a h Portland OR 97233 SERVICES REVIEW a a County Ph : 503-988-3043 Fax: 503-988-3389 Take this form to the multco.us/landuse Police/Sheriff Services that serve the property. Address of Site: 40301 E. Larch Mountain Road , Corbett. OR 97019 Tax Roll Description of Property: 1N-5E-30CC. Tax Lots 1600 6.1500 (R832300010 6. R832301940) Description of Proposed Use: Well ness retreat center with spa facilities and five guest rooms for overnight accommodations. I·~ · ~j~ If Residential Use, Total Number of Dwelling Units: I JJJ.N · , ::!_1.J 2 6 -TO THE APPLICANT- ©...}':. ?0/8 ~----"""- Approval of most land uses involving a new or expanded use, or involving the crea~ f ~ pare requires verification from the local police I sheriff services provider that there will be adequatepe · protection. Complete the applicable sections of this form and take it to the police or sheriff department serving the property. Include the completed form with your application. Applicant Name: _K_ei_th_ D_a_ily______Phone: 503-235-9400 Mailing Address: 321 SW Fourth Avenue. #200 City: Portland State: _ o_R___ ·_ Zip Code: _97_2_0_4___ _ E:mail: keith@emerick- architects.com - TO BE COMPLETED BY A LOCAL POLICE I SHERIFF OFFICIAL - )8( The level of police/sheriff service available to serve the proposed project is ADEQUATE. Comment (Optional): D The level of police/sheriff service available to serve the proposed project is NOT ADEQUATE. Please indicate why: Date: //2-1/t_y /J1t,/./,,zRrnkb &, bn~ J',t,-e:,,,,. ,y;e ~. Name of Police/Sheriff Servi e; Provider //?rn .,k ?e 1';k,- Name of Official C-t. "'77 /n'2 r7h-..- Office Held by Official [RETURN THIS FORM TO THE APPLICANT! Police/Sheriff Services Review EXHIBIT A.18 ( ( Transportation Division 1 1600 SE 190 h Ave J6...Multnomah Portland OR 97233 TRANSPORTATION County Ph: 503-988-5050 Fax: 503-988-3389 PLANNING REVIEW a a multco.us/transportation-planning TO THE APPLICANT Multnomah County Road Rules govern the administration of roads under the jurisdiction of Multnomah County. These rules provide the link between the County Code provisions of MCC 29.500, et seq. and the Design and Construction Manual adopted under the provisions of these rules pursuant to MCC 29.571. Submit this form to the County Transportation Planning Specialist along with a site plan of the development that also shows driveway information. After the Transportation Planning Specialist signs this form and attaches a draft memorandum and/or findings, include it with your application, along with the signed site-plar:i.-. ------., ~ • 1 Address of Site: 40301 E Larch Mountain Road. Corbett. OR 97019 "R" #: R832300010 6. R832301940 ,_ )'.-> Description of Proposed Use: Spa retreat center with overnight accommodations I I \ Pre-Filing No.: EP- 2016-6073 Land Use Case No.: l>.., ------+;I·,-- - -.-... 'fJ~ Applicant Name: _K_e_i t_h_D_a_i ~ly______Phone: 503-235-9400 II r-..J < Address: 321 SW Fourth Avenue. 11200 Email: keith@emerick-architect kom c::i City: __P_ o_rt_la_n_d______State: __O_ R___ _ Zip Code: 97204 I 8 TRANSPORTATION REVIEW The County Transportation Planning Specialist will initial the appropriate boxes below to confirm which of the standards of the County Road Rules have been met. This form is to stay with all building plans through the permit review process. D Ok to issue permit. Staff Initials ____ Transportation Impact Fee: Paid D NotPaid D D Approved site plan is attached with signature. ~k to issue permit. The topowing conditions need to be met: ------~--1f----F-----'--'-'"-'- f 1. 2. All conditions of ______(case#) have been met. 3. The proposal involves a new or reconfigured access onto a road under County j urisdiction: . a) The new or reconfigured access meets the access spacing standards in the Design and Construction Manual. b) The proposed driveway width conforms to the dimensions laid out in the Design and Construction Manual. c) The minimum sight distance is equal to the standards in lhe Design and Construction Manual. 4. The proposal results in a transportation impact as defined by Section 5.300 of the Multnomah County Road Rules: a) Right-of-way and/or easement dedications are necessary to bring the affected, existing, created or planned public streets and other facilities within and abutting the development to the current County standard. x b) A pro-rata share of improvements along all of the site's road frontage(s) are required (e.g. street widening, utility cut restoration, curbs and sidewalks, etc.). +1 c) Off-site improvements will be required. d) Deed restrictions and/or easements will be required . ,. . • ~,fyJ )( 5. A Transportation Impact Study is required: · )("'( 0 (JI. ~ (J""'..:. ·~. " · j ~ <----+---+----+-~-----< 1 a) The proposed scope of the study must be submitted. ,. ' I . ~ Jj tfv\,1J ~V\. 6. A Variance to the Road Rules or Design and Construction Manual is required. ""~ - Variance has been subm itted. File No:_____ ~------1 S hl'f M'(t/ ~ VV\U~,\-- kt_ rtiJ \tYV-e-v{ . G:EPFILES/EP Process/Transportation Planning Review EXHIBIT Rev. 5-13-14 ~~~~~ A.19 Department of Commum _ Services JA...Multnomah Transportation Division http://multco.us/transportation-planning ...-..county 1620 SE 1901h Avenue, Portland Oregon 97233-5910 • PH. (503) 988-5050 • Fax (503) 988-3321 TO: Rithy Khut, Planner, Multnomah County CC: Joanna Valencia, Planning and Development Manager, Multnomah County Jessica Berry, Senior Transportation Planner, Multnomah County FROM : Eileen Cunningham, Transportation Planning Specialist, Multnomah County DATE : November 3, 2016 SUBJECT: EP-2016-6073/PA-2016-6044, Heiner Fruehauf The comments provided in this memorandum are based on the preliminary project description of the subject project provided in the notice of pre-application conference. While every effort has been made to identify all related standards and issues, additional issues may arise and other standards not listed may become applicable as more information becomes available. The proposed project is located at 40301 East Larch Mountain Road which is situated on the northwest corner of East Larch Mountain Road and NE Columbia Avenue. The proposed site use includes the remodel of an existing retreat center {View Point Inn) in Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. Transportation Impact A transportation impact is defined in Multnomah County Road Rules 3.000 as any new construction or alteration which increases the number of trips generated by a site by more than 20 percent, by more than 100 trips per day or by more than 10 trips in the peak hour. A minimum increase of 10 new trips per day is required to find a transportation impact. Construction of a new single-family home on a vacant lot will generate 10 new trips {a single-family home generates 10 trips per day on average) and create a transportation impact. Applicant will need to provide detailed information about trip generation rates including hours of operation, time of day, deliveries, customers, etc. This will need to be provided as part of the NSA permit application. Right of Way (ROW) Dedication East Larch Mountain Road is a Multnomah County Jurisdictional road with a Rural Collector functional class and NE Columbia Avenue is a Local Access road. The County's preferred cross section for a Rural Collector is attached to this memo. The preferred ROW width for a Rural Collector is 60 feet {30 feet from centerline); the existing ROW width is 60 feet. The preferred ROW width for a Local Access Road is 60 feet {30 feet from centerline). The current ROW width is 30 feet {15 feet from centerline). An approved variance from the standard ROW width is on file {2016-236535, case file T3-06-006). The County's preferred cross section for both facilities is attached to this memo. Page 1of2 Deed Restriction The property owner will need record deed restrictions (provided by County Transportation) with County Records, committing the property owner to participate in future right-of-way improvements costs. This will need to be completed prior to as a condition of Land Use application approval. A non-remonstrance agreement, or "deed restriction" will require that the property owner to participate in standard rural collector road improvements along the site's frontage that are not completed as a part of the site's required interim improvements. Contact Pat Hinds at (503) 988-3712 to complete the ROW dedication and deed restriction requirement. Access requirements An access permit is on file (No. 65292), permitting the existing horseshoe type driveway configuration which provides access onto East Larch Mountain Road and NE Columbia Avenue. This permit also authorizes the two accesses to a gravel parking lot located on tax lot 1500, 1N5E30CC that will serve the parking needs for patrons and employees of the Viewpoint Inn, located on the east side of NE Columbia Avenue. Permitted access location are highlighted on the site plan attached to permit No. 65292. In circumstances where there is a transportation impact and no existing driveway permit on file, the County will treat the driveway as a new access. MCRR 18.250 and 4.000 treat any access with a transportation impact as a new access. Prior to submitting the Land Use application, call or email the County's ROW office at 503-988-3582 or [email protected] and reference EP number EP-2016- 6181 in your inquiry. Storm Water Any alteration of the storm water discharge onto the right-of-way requires a Discharge Permit. Any alteration of storm water drainage to the existing discharge needs to be reviewed by the County. Increased run-off to incorporated Multnomah County could negatively impact the roadway system. ROW staff will review site plans for any increases in runoff to County assets and may require additional information. The County currently accepts Portland Storm Water Manual methodology. Page 2 of 2 EP-2016-4916 ,..__ ~ -~ 810/ o ,., " c7 if IVl/ t I QJ:t_/il ...._, : -..:: Z-l." .._N."~-~. I I ') I I I I NOTES: 1, THE RED ROAD INDICATES THE PROPOSED REROUTING Of COLUMBIA AVENU E DURING CONSTRUCTION Of THE PROPOSED PROJECT, THIS OPTION KEEPSTHE CONSTRUCTION ROAD WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE ~EV.t: D ATE: DESCRIPTION PROJECT PROPERTY, 2, THE BLUE ROAD INDICATESTHE PREFERREDOPT ION FOR REROUTING COLUMBIA AVENUE DURING CONSTRUCTION Of THE PROPOSED PROJECT, THIS OPTION PROVIDES EASIERACCESS TO THE ROAD AREA NORTH Of THE PROJECT PROPERTY, BUT REQUIRES ~I. 7P(f ) 5157.75 APROVAL FROM THE ADJACENT LANDOWNER IN ADDITION TO R.OW, APPROVAL TO PROCEED, ~ o6 11". , UJ 1J / ~ z ~"" z z g£:: - UJ CR r:'.'.f" " , Ir~f) /1 ;;:t''""· "'.,"" ~,~-, ~ ~ u 5~ _J~(/)::;;0 l\ ~ 0 ~ -§~ n ,-- D--·/ Q :r:a..z .3-e -i·c . i -- . . ~ ~_iwO _J 0 u 1 \ 0 / ' ,o - - .-• "- f UJ UJ '"' (~) ,-·-~-----.. -- > ~ \f 1 , i~,-,j'-_):,~ .:~-' ~ -""< ------,_~ ~- - \ ' -= -- ' ------a;-... ., ),i.,,;.--/;:;...-. ~~ -=--- \ \ : ~_!.--[-._ __/ - _.--· LAR ------,-- / >- z ,,,,,, ~ "" 0 -- ~ ;:::: I 0 u _.-----<~ n_ => _,., ~ ::;;:u_uig: ,/ ,,,------~O~z 0 ol'.lwz-U < 0 GRAPHIC,. SCALE o§~(,'.) 1(r n_ o=> z 1 inch =20 ft . i?ffio~ n_"" u 0 4 ~:~~~~~.19l HX.'tlBV: PROPOSED TEMPORARY REROUTING OF COLUMBIA AVE. ~~~~~~~ii~ PERMITHASB 1 {CITY OF GRESHAM Area Calrulationv; 1 Dining: 1,260of Veranda/ ~:xa ~ Lot 1500: ~ 9IOZ 9 g Nttr 1'otal: aal\1a0~ (E) Spmlmtttt 21 "sq Stone po$1; hiterpre~v~ lli:'iplay ' 0 ' (E) ' ' ' Deck . ,;u;p.'P"=w/ ------\.-i.nJJ disb '. •'l'JJ"ofc PREVIOUSLy APPROVED PARKING LAYOUT INCLUDED FOR REFERENCE. SEE DRAWING SHEET A0.1 FOR CURRENT PROPOSED LAYOUT. f<.o \\if f)> l l pw 3) ·-· ..... ··: :····· ··· ·· ·.. ······ ··· ··············· .. ·: ~ ...... ~ I I Rural Local Access Roads No. of Homes Width Surface Depth (Startin!! 15" bdow eradc) D/R ~ ...... ~ 1·2 15 feet }!ravel 8.. }!rnvcl Yes . . I grmd (1 0'' }!,rtl\d " I •ravel 13" •ravel Yes I oavcd 4"/13" Yes ~---·~~~ NOTES: ~- -: l. THE RED ROAD INDICATES THE PROPOSED REROUTING OF COLUMBIA AVENUE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. THIS OPTION KEEPS THE f; CONSTRUCTION ROAD WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE REV.#: DATE : DESCRIPTION / I. PROJECT PROPERTY. I '!' -L_,._ _f"l''Fl',,,io-,..,....,..,.....,..~~ . TP 956.66 2. THE BLUE ROAD INDICATES THE PREFERRED OPTION FOR REROUTING COLUMBIA AVENUE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. THIS OPTION PROVIDES EASIER ACCESS TO THE ROAD AREA NORTH OF THE PROJECT PROPERTY, BUT REQUIRES APROVAL FROM THE ADJACENT LANDOWNER IN ADDITION TO R.O.W. APPROVAL TO PROCEED. ( - TP 960.00 ·' IL _ - - --- ...,. '·~-~~-f -=\ ~-·~· -=- - ~("-f.~----- ~-- ~ ~ I • -----~-·--- ..:..._ 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 . I 1 inch = 20 ft. >- : ,_ : PROJECT NO: 1723 2 ~ DRWN BY: ICHK'D BY: ~ ~ DATE: 01.19.18 ~ : ~ : : PROPOSED TEMPORARY REROUTING OF COLUMBIA AVE. LW :····· ······ ··············· ·············; ~ ~ ~ 0 oocu~~~s ~~ o~~~~~~~~~~: -;:' ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A BUILDING Z PERM ITHAS BEEN ISSU ED. <' ...... ( ( Land Use Planning Division 1 "C:..' 1600 SE 190 h Ave, Ste 116 -c~ -- .,,."\ Portland OR 97233 J4 <...:_ w >' Ph: 503-988-3043 Fax: 503-988-3389 "'t.t> IV;; ~· "'""':· .., 6' ~ 0 multco.us/landuse "" Note: Response to each question below must be completed or verified by a Certified Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer, including a State of Oregon Registration Stamp and Number in the space provided on page four. The HDP form 1 addresses Multnomah County Code Section . 5515 (A)(3), Hillside Development Permits. 40301 East Larch Mountain Road, Corbett, OR 97019 L~alDescriptiori: __1_N_~_E_-_3_oc_c_,T_a_x_L_o_t_1_so_o_&_1_6_00 ______ Property Owner's Name: __H_S_F_,_L_L_c_. ______ Firm Preparing Report: ______Geotecbnical Resources, Inc. _ 9750 SW Nimbus Avenue Address: ------City: ______Beaverton . State: ____OR Zip:_. ___97008 _ Wes Spang, George Freitag Preparer's Name: ______ 503-641 -3478 Phone Number: ------~ GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION west property margin 1. a. Maximum Slope on Prope1iy: 60 degrees Area in which it is located: ______Average Slope of Prope1ty: 10 deqrees on remainder of property b. Are there any wetlands or streambeds on the prope1ty? (Please Circle) Ye(~ If yes, please show on topographical survey or sketch. 1,093 CY c. Volume of soil or earth material disturbed, stored, disposed of or used as fill: _____ d. Total area of proposed ground disturbance: 22,379 (square feet) 0.50 ac (acres) EXHIBIT A.20 Hillside Dev Permit Application Page I of 4 Were building plans considered when completing ti1is form? (Please Circle) @ No If yes, please note the author and date the plans were prepared. Emerick Architects 'l/9/2018 2. What is the general topography of the property? Please· attach a topographic survey or sketch with pertinent notes. The site consists of two tax lots separated by a public road at elevation of 960.0'. The parking lot of TL 1500 will be adjusted from an existing 2.0% slope falling to northeasterly elevation 956.0' to•a proposed 3.2% slope with 3: 1 catch slopes at north and east boundaries. TL 1600 has a northwesterly fall sloping 2.0% across existing building pad then a variable 5% to 25% slope to top of bluff at 946.0'. The most northwesterly 20.0' to 30.0' of property .falls further down from the top of bluff towards the Historic Columbia River Highway and was not surveyed. 3. See attached survey. .. - ...... (Landslides, slumps, mud flow, creep, ravines, fills, cuts, seeps, springs, ponds, etc.) within the surrounding area for a minimum distance of 100 feet beyond the subject property boundaries? Describe.and indicate on attached topographic survey or sketcl:l. Tl1e slope along the western property margin, adjacent to the east side of the Historic Columbia River Highway, is mapped by DOGAMI as the head scarp of the large landslide that is present west of the highway (labelled Washougal_ 103 by DOGAMI). The head scarp is present along the east side of the highway from E. Larch Mountain Road north to the Vista House. Additional information to be included in geotechnical report. 4. Is any earthwork proposed in connection with site development? (Please. Circle) No If yes, please indicate depth and extent of cuts/fills; describe fill types. A variable cut from 3' to 1O' will occur within the proposed building outline in order in order to excavate the existing basement to the proposed 4200- sq ft basement, FF to 948.0'. The only substantial fill on .site will be gravel for the paths, loading zone and parking lot. 5. In your opinion, will the proposed earthwork cause potential stability problems for the subject and/or adjacent properties? (Please Circle) Yes IF YES, EXPRESS PROBABILITY: (Please Circle) Very Probable Possibly Possible, but remote If Ve1:y Probable or Possibly, please explain. Hillside Dev Pennit Application Page 2 of 4 6. In your opinion, will the proposed development (structures, foundations, parking area, streets, etc.) create potential stability problems for the subject and/or adjacent properties? (Please Circle) Yes IF YES, EXPRESS PROBABILITY: (Please Circle) Very Probable Possibly Possible, but remote If Very Probable or Possibly, please explain. 7. In your opinion would the subsurface disposal of sewage effluent on the site (i.e., drain fields) have an adverse affect on stability of the site or adjacent area? (Piease Circle) No IF YES, EXPRESS PROBABILITY: (Please Circle) Very Probable Possibly This assumes there is minimal If Very Probable or Possibly, please explain. increase in effluent flow to existing drain field 8. If answer is Very Probable or Possibly to questions 4 or 5, is it your opinion, on the basis of a visual evaluation, that adequate stability might be achieved by preferred siting of the development, alternative foundation support, earthwork, drainage, etc.? (Please Circle) No If yes, please explain. Proposed building is ~ 125 ft from the top of slope present along the western property line. Minimal fill being placed on site. Hillside Dev Permit Application Page 3 of 4 9. Do you recommend additional geotechnical studies (i.e., mapping, testing pits or borings, stability analysis, etc.) prior to site development? (Please Circle) No If yes, please explain. Geotechnical engineering investigation by GRI By signing and affixing the required stamp below, the Certifying Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer certifies that the site is suitable for the proposed development. Affix Seal Here Signature /,J-? Hillside Dev Permit Application Page 4 of 4 ( ( Hillside Land Use Planning Division Development Permit 1 J&..Multnomah 1600 SE 190 h Ave, Ste 116 (HOP) Work Sheet Portland OR 97233 a a County Ph: 503-988-3043 Fax: 503-988-3389 Associated Active Cases: multco.us/landuse ri· \ ;·' .., ~,,._.___ '.1R157 Instructions for Applicants: JAN B 6 20 18 ~ 1 T~is .questionnaire has been put to~ether to as~ist you in ptep ~r~ a_~ applicalion ~or developme~t within the Hillside Development Overlay. While not reqmred, we encourage you-tlr:collfilJlt with an Oregon licensed Certified Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer when completing this form. Information in this worksheet is intended to supplement the Geotechnical Report or Geotechnical Reconnaissance Survey [HDP Form l]. The responses and supporting documents you provide will be the basis for determining whether or not your application satisfies the Hillside Development criteria. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Description: Renovation of fire damaged View Point Inn to become a spa/retreat facility. Site Address or Legal Description: 40301 E Larch Mtn Rd, Corbett, OR Average Slope of Property(%): 10% Maximum Slope on Property(%): 33% Proposed Area in which it is located: At North & East catch slopes of parking lot. Surface area disturbed 3 (square feet and acres)*: 22,379 sf 0.51 ac Volume of excavation/fill (yd ): 480· cut. 1083 fill (613 cy net) Completed By: Humber Design Group Date: 1 /1 9/2018 *Construction activities disturbing between 1 and 5 acres are automatically covered under the Oregon (DEQ) Department of Environmental Quality (NPDES) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Discharge General Permit No.1200- CN. This relieves many applicants from also having to apply for a DEQ permit. Activities disturbing over 5 acres are not eligible for automatic coverage and are subject to additional permitting requirements by DEQ under the 1200-C program. Please ask the planning office for a copy of the "GENERAL PERMIT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT" provisions for more information on projects qualifying for automatic coverage. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This worksheet has been put together to assist you in addressing approval criteria. Additional information is required to submit an application. This includes a General Application Form, deeds, site plan, service provider forms and title report. Please reference the Hillside Development Permit Handout for a list of submittal and site plan requirements. EXHIBIT GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS A.21 A Hillside Development Permit may be approved by the County only after the applicant provides one of the following. Please check the applicable box. D Topographic information is enclosed showing the proposed development to be on land with average slopes less than 25 percent, and located more than 200 feet from a known landslide, and that no cuts or fills in excess of 6 feet in height are planned. High groundwater conditions shall be assumed unless documentation is available, demonstrating otherwise; or D A geotechnical report prepared by a Certified Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer is attached certifying that the site is suitable for the proposed development. The report includes any specific investigations required by the County and recommendations for any further work or changes in proposed work which may be necessary to ensure reasonable safety from earth movement hazards; or Hillside Development Permit Worksheet (Rev. 01/14) Pagel of6 ( llD An HDP Form- 1 completed, signed and certified by a Certified Engineering Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer with his/her stamp and signature affixed has been prepared indicating that the site is suitable for the proposed development. NOTE: If the HDP Form- 1 indicates a need for fi1rther investigation, or if the Director requires fi1rther study based upon in-formation contained in the HDP Form- 1, a geotechnical report as specified by the Director shall be prepared and submitted. HDP APPROVAL ST AND ARDS County approval of development plans must be based upon findings that the proposal adequately addresses the standards listed below. Some of the standards can be satisfied by checking the corresponding box. By checking a box, you are confirming that the statement applies to your project. 1. Fill materials, compaction methods and density specifications shall be indicated. Fill areas intended to support structures shall be identified on the plan. Ila The fill materials, compaction methods and density specifications are included on the site plan or are described below. Fill areas intended to support structures are identified on the plan. 0 There is no fill included in the proposed project. Structural fill should consist of imported granular material or approved on site native soil. Fill should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-698 or until well keyed. Fine grained fill soils should be compacted with a sheepsfoot while granular fill should be compacted with a vibratory roller or vibratory plate compactors. 2. Cut and fill slopes shall not be steeper than 3(H):1M (i.e. 33%) unless a geological and/or engineering analysis certifies that the steep slopes are safe and erosion control measures are specified. 0 Cut or fill slopes steeper than 33% have been certified as safe in the attached geological and/or engineering analysis. Appropriate erosion control measures are also specified in the analysis. DD There are no cut or fill slopes steeper than 33%. 3. Cuts and fills will not endanger or disturb adjoining property. Ila A Geotechnical Reconnaissance (HDP Form 1) or geotechnical report has been prepared confirming that cut or fills will not endanger or disturb adjoining property. 0 Cuts and fills will not endanger or disturb adjoining property for the following reasons: Note: This issue is specifically addressed in the HDP Form I and you can rely upon the response by the Certified Engineering Geologist or Geo technical Engineer that completed the form. A geotechnical report may or may not address the issue. Ifyou need to prepare a response, please make sure to address any earthwork that is to occur close to a property line or storm run-off that will discharge off the property. 4. The proposed drainage system will have adequate capacity to bypass through the development the existing upstream flow from a storm of 10-year design frequency; 0 A County Stormwater Certificate completed by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer demonstrates that this standard has been satisfied (Note: A Certificate must be submitted for projects involving more than 500 square feet of impervious swfaces). Page 2 of6 ' I ( ll There is no existing upstream flow of run-off. 5. Fills shall not encroach on natural watercourses or constructed channels unless measures are approved which will adequately handle the displaced stream flow for a storm of 10-year design frequency; 0 Fill will encroach on a natural watercourse or constructed channel as shown on the site plan. As illustrated on the plan, and confirmed with the enclosed Stormwater Certificate, adequate measures will be put in place to handle the stream flow for a storm of 10-year design frequency. (Note: A separate Flood Hazard Permit is required). 00 A site plan has been provided demonstrating that fill work will not encroach on natural watercourses or constructed channels. 6. On sites within the Tualatin River Drainage Basin, specific stormwater and erosion control standards apply. The Basin includes unincorporated rural areas west of Skyline Boulevard. ll The development site is outside of the Tualatin River Drainage Basin (skip to standard #7). 0 The site is within the Tualatin River Drainage Basin and: • Measures for controlling erosion and stormwater have been designed to perform as prescribed by the currently adopted edition of the City of Portland Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Manuals; and • The stormwater system has been designed to manage runoff onsite to the maximum extent possible; and • Land-disturbing activities are at least a 100-foot from the top of the bank of a stream or ordinary high watermark (line of vegetation) of a water body, or a mitigation plan consistent with OAR 340 is enclosed for alterations within the buffer area. (Note: For the mitigation plan, the County utilizes vegetated corridor provisions contained in Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards manual. A copy of the manual is available on their website at http://www.cleanwaterservices.org. On slopes less than 25 percent, land disturbing activities can be approved to within 50 feet ofa water body provided at least 80 percent of the intervening area is planted with native trees, shrubs, and groundcover that will achieve at least 50% canopy coverage at maturity. Mitigation must occur at a minimum I: I ratio to disturbed areas. Ifyour site does not fall within these parameters, other options may exist which you can discuss with our staff.) 7. Stripping of vegetation, grading, or other soil disturbance shall be done in a manner which will minimize soil erosion, stabilize the soil as quickly as practicable, and expose the smallest practical area at any one time during construction. Please explain how the proposed development meets this standard. With the small size of project and its specific construction areas it is anticipated that they will be exposed, stabilized, constructed and/or landscaped as individual treatments which will meet this standard using typical erosion and sediment control measures as dictated in C1 .0 & C3.0 8. Development Plans shall minimize cut or fill operations and ensure conformity with topography so as to create the least erosion potential and adequately accommodate the volume and velocity of surface runoff. Please explain how the proposed development meets this standard. The design submitted shows a relatively unchanged topography. The added paths will remain very close to existing grades in most cases and will have 3" of earth excavation for 3" of gravel path material. The existing Columbia Avenue and private parking lot will have minimal excavation to clear scrub and approximately 6" to 12" of gravel placed for auto access. The majority of cut is found within the building footprint in order to create a full basement. Refer to heet C1 .0. Page 3 of6 ( ( 9. Temporary vegetation and/or mulching shall be used to protect exposed critical areas during development. (Note: Critical areas are typically soils that if exposed are likely to erode into drainageways or onto roads or nearby properties.) 0 The attached erosion control plan includes the use of temporary vegetation and/or mulch to protect exposed soils. Ila There will be no exposed critical areas. Please explain ______The design s1ibmitted shows a relatively 1mchanged topography Any area that soil that becomes exposed will either be within the hole of proposed basement excavation or on site being minimally excavated to receive new improved gravel surfacing Refer to sheet C1 D & C3 D 10. Whenever feasible, natural vegetation shall be retained, protected, and supplemented. Please explain how the proposed development meets this standard. The proposed design seeks to retain as much of the existing vegetation as practicable. As indicated on sheet L0.01 . only a select number of plantings are to be removed. while the majority of existing trees and screenings are to remain and be protected. New screen plantings will be added to supplement existing vegetation and any lawn areas to remain will be newly seeded. Refer to sheet L0.01 and L2.01 . Also, check one of the following: IJI The site plan provided shows that a 100-foot undisturbed buffer of natural vegetation will be retained from the top of the bank of a stream, or from the ordinary high watermark (line of vegetation) of a water body, or wetland; or D Development will encroach within the 100 foot buffer. A mitigation plan is enclosed utilizing erosion control and stormwater measures prescribed by the currently adopted edition of the City of Portland Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Manuals. The plan further meets surface water quality equivalent to those established for the Tualatin River Drainage Basin in OAR 340. (Note: See note under item #6 regarding mitigation plan requirements). 11. Permanent plantings and any required structural erosion control and drainage measures will be installed as soon as practical. Please explain how the proposed development meets this standard. Contractor to install all erosion control measures as noted prior to breaking ground. Proposed grading and utility plan does not require any drainage/erosion control measures as designed. There are no existing or proposed concentrated flows to manage as such. Permanent plantings are scheduled to be installed as part of the general construction contract, and therefore shall be in place prior to overall completion of project construction. 12. Provisions shall be made to effectively accommodate increased runoff caused by altered soil and surface conditions during and after development. The rate of surface water runoff shall be structurally retarded where necessary. Please explain how the proposed development meets this standard. Both during and following construction the runoff shall be decreased with the addition of gravel at surface in back yard and loading zone where there were none previously. The road and parking lot should also experience a decrease in run off with an increased gravel section. Refer to sheet C1 .0 & C3.0. Page 4 of6 13. Sediment in the runoff water shall be trapped by use of debris basins, silt traps, or other measures until the disturbed area is stabilized. 0 The site plan provided includes debris basins, silt traps, or other measures (specify: which will ------~ be installed and maintained until the disturbed areas are stabilized. !XI The development will not generate sediment laden run-off to warrant the installation of these measures. Please explain: ------The site will be wrapped in erosion control measures such as sediment fencing and silt trap for the single existing area drain. The majority of site is and will remain gravel or lawn and thus infiltrates directly, creating no run off to become sediment laden. Refer to sheet C1 .0 & C3.0. 14. Provisions shall be made to prevent surface water from damaging the cut face of excavations or the sloping surface of fills by installation of temporary or permanent drainage across or above such areas, or by other suitable stabilization measures such as mulching or seeding. Please explain how the proposed development meets this standard. While there are no existing drainage ditches to line or seed, all cut/fill slopes outside of building envelope shall be grassed and or landscaped as soon as practical to protected from erosion as directed on sheet C1 .0 & C3.0. 15. All drainage provisions shall be designed to adequately carry existing and potential surface runoff to suitable drainageways such as storm drains, natural watercourses, drainage swales, or an approved drywell system. DD Drainage improvements shown on the site plan have been designed to cany existing and potential surface runoff to the following drainageway:_S_ub__su__rf_a_c_e_i_nf_iltr__a_t_io_n______0 No drainage improvements are associated with the development. 16. Drainage swales used to divert surface water shall be vegetated or protected to minimize erosion. 0 Drainage swales are being used and will be protected to minimize potential erosion. Method of protection: Ila No drainage swales will be installed. 17. Erosion and sediment control devices shall be employed where necessary to prevent polluting discharges from occurring. These may include, but are not limited to: • Energy absorbing devices to reduce runoff water velocity; • Sedimentation controls such as sediment or debris basins. Any trapped materials shall be removed to an approved disposal site on an approved schedule; • Dispersal of water runoff from developed areas over large undisturbed areas. 0 Erosion control devices of this type are being employed to prevent pollution discharges as shown on the site plan. !XI No devices are needed to prevent pollution discharges from occurring. Please explain: ______The existing and proposed storm water for th site shall infiltrate through either pervious surfaces or infiltration devices. The existing roof drains to an existing soakage trench and the proposed roof drains connect to a new drywell. Page 5 of6 ( 18. Disposed spoil material or' stock-piled topsoil shall be prevented from eroding into streams or drainageways by applying mulch or other protective covering; or by location at a sufficient distance from streams or drainageways; or by other sediment reduction measures. IJI As noted on the plan, stockpiled spoils or topsoil will be covered and are located such that they will not erode into nearby streams or drainages. 0 Spoil material or topsoil will be removed as it is excavated and will not be stored on-site. 19. Such non-erosion pollution associated with construction such as pesticides, fertilizers, petrochemicals, solid wastes, construction chemicals, or wastewaters shall be prevented from leaving the construction site through proper handling, disposal, continuous site monitoring and clean-up activities. Please explain how the proposed development will meet this standard. A site specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will be created prior to the start of construction. The SWPPP plan will outline the site perimeter silt containment, disposal practices and monitoring schedule. All construction waste will be disposed of in a dumpster or hauled off the site in a truck. A Spill Prevention & Control Plan will be in place to manage any onsite contamination. 20. On sites within the Balch Creek Drainage Basin, land disturbing activities are limited to the period between May first and October first of any year. All permanent vegetation or a winter cover crop shall be seeded or planted by October first of the same year the development was begun; all soil not covered by buildings or other impervious surfaces must be completely vegetated by December first of the same year the development was begun. Balch Creek Basin The following is a map depicting the boundaries of the Balch Creek Drainage basin. 0 The property resides within the Balch Creek Drainage basin. This application has been tailored with the understanding that land disturbing work will be limited to the period between May 1st and October 1st and that cover crops must be established within this timeframe. !JD The property is not located within the Balch Creek Drainage Basin. Page 6 of6 ( ( '' Stormwater Management Facilities Private Stormwater Report Viewpoint Inn HOG Job#: EMA022 Prepared For: HSF LLC PO Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 Prepared By: Humber Design H Group, Inc. 117 SE Taylor St. Suite 001 Portland, OR 97214 (P) 503 946 6690 'I hereby certify that this Stormwater Management Report for the Viewpoint Inn project has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets minimum standards of and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, EXPIRES 6-30-2018 suitability, or performance of drainage facilities designed by me.' Date: January 18, 2018 EXHIBIT A.22 Table of Contents Project Overview and Description 2 Vicinity Map 3 Methodology 4 Analysis 5 Engineering Conclusions 6 APPENDICES Appendix A Stormwater Facility Details I Exhibits A Utility Plan Catchment Map Drywell Detail Appendix B Support Calculations B HydroCad Report Appendix C Operations and Maintenance Plan c To Be Provided at Permit Humber Design Group, Inc 1 EMA022 Storm Report Project Overview and Description Location of Project 40301 E Larch Mountain Rd, Corbett, OR 97019 Site Area/Acreage 1.21 ac Nearest Cross Street NE Columbia Ave, E Larch Mountain Rd Existing Conditions Site is currently occupied by decrepit building and poorly maintained gravel driveway and parking areas. Proposed Development Proposed development includes renovations and additions to existing historical building. R# R287200,R287215 Tax Map 1N SE 30CC Tax Lot 1500, 1600 Humber Design Group, Inc 2 EMA022 Storm Report ( ( Vicinity Map - Site Location Humber Design Group, Inc 3 EMA022 Storm Report Methodology Existing Drainage Runoff from existing building is collected and directs to existing soakage trench at the north of the site. The remainder of the site, which is undeveloped and pervious drains steeply to the northwest. Infiltration Results Infiltration testing by Geotechnical Resources, Inc. on January 2, 2018 found rates of 3.5 inches per hour at 13.5 feet bgs in the northern portion of the parking lot, and 4 inches per hour at 14 ft bgs in the yard southwest of the house. PRIVATE Proposed Stormwater Stormwater runoff from existing building will continue to be Management Techniques managed via soakage trench. Runoff from accessory building at the northeast of the site and new impervious area created by proposed expansion will be collected via roof drains and piped to a drywell to the north of the expanded building. Humber Design Group, Inc 4 EMA022 Storm Report Analysis Computational HydroCAD models of a SBUH Type 1A Storm were used to calculate the stormwater Method Used management facility sizes for the catchment areas. See attached calculations. Below is a summary of the results. Hydrologic Soil c Group Hydrologic Soil Mershon silt loam Types Table 1 - Curve Numbers Post-Developed Impervious CN 98 Table 2 - Design Storms WQ Storm 0.83 inches 2-year 2.40 inches 10-year 3.40 inches 25-year 3.90 inches 100-year 4.40 inches Table 3 - Time of Concentration Predeveloped TOC 5 min Post-Developed TOC 5 min T a bl e 4 - C at c h mentA reas an d Fac11tv Tt T a bl e Facility Catchment/ Facility Source (roof, road, Treatment Ownership Type/ Facility Size ID etc.) Area (sf) (private/ public) Function 48" dia x A Roof 2,000 sf Private Drywell 10' h Humber Design Group, Inc 5 EMA022 Storm Report Engineering Conclusions The preceding methodologies and calculations presented indicate compliance with the current jurisdictional stormwater management codes and requirements. A summarized breakdown is presented below: Water Quality The proposed development will meet the provisions for water quality per the 2016 Portland Stormwater Management Manual. Water Quantity The proposed development will meet the provisions for water quantity per the 2016 Portland Stormwater Management Manual. Downstream I Upstream There are no upstream or downstream impacts created by this proposed Impacts development. 100 year storm The 100 year storm will be safely conveyed away from structures. Humber Design Group, Inc 6 EMA022 Storm Report Appendix A Stormwater Facility Details/ Exhibits Utility Plan Catchment Map Drywell Detail :·· .. ····································: UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BY CORBETT WATER DISTRICT AT OWNER'S EXPENSE. I CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH CORBETT WATER DISTRICT MANAGER, JEFF BUSTO (503)695-2284. APPROX/MA TE LOCATION OF 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE EXISTING SEPTIC FACILITIES PRIOR TO EXISTING 1,350 GPO SEPTIC CONSTRUCT/ON TO VERIFY LDCA T/ON. SYSTEM CONTAINING (3) 1,500 GAL TANKS, 3. INSTALL FOUNDATION DRAIN AROUND PERIMETER OF ALL STRUCTURES. (1) 500 GAL TANK, AND 450 LF INFILTRA T/ON LINES 4. CAP AND ABANDON EXISTING WATER SERVICE AT MAIN. r...... 1 ROOF DRAIN, TYP. PROPERTY LINE ;!---~~------UTILITY LEGEND ~~;:~r j Group, Inc. ~ • AREA DRAIN, CATCH BASIN, OVERFLOW DRAIN mPortland, OR. 503.946.6690. hdgpdx.c:orn: CLEANOUT ~ ...... ~ -0- FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FIRE HYDRANT irn WATER VAULT 8 DRYWELL 32LF-6"SD soc ~ I I 45LF-6"SD I s~o.0200 Ml I REV.#: DATE: DESCRIPTION I f-~I 8]1 ~:, LEGEND "'''"' ~1 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE STRUCTURE O:::'. BLDG OVERHANG o6 w CJ SAWCUT LINE I- 0.:: z c EDGE OF PAVEMENT z z ·5 0-: CURB, WHEEL STOPS w c R ~ STORM PIPE u I- :::> 0-: _J u 0 0.::: I CATCH BASIN _J z (/) ~ 0 ~ I DRYWELL L I LL (/) u :::: ~ FLOW LINE (/) 0 w '- (]) : 0 I I 0.... _g -2 SANITARY LINE z i ~I __J w o: :ii ::::....a:EOJt. __ SANITARY CLEANOUT L __ ~ __J 0 Uj -1 SANITARY DRAIN FIELD (") OVER/=JEAB Phi\ w w WATER LINE 0 g:~.j1 BURIED COM. WATER METER VAULT > ~ """ WATER VALVE CONCRETE EW 2" WATER METER NEW 4" CONNECTIO A.G. PAVEMENT TO 10" WATER LINE ------·------··--- -··----~--·· ------GRAVEL STONE WALKWAY NEW 2" CONNECTIO STONE WALL TO 10" WATER LINE FENCE TREE MAIL BOX z GRAVEL <( BUILDING __J PAVEMENT 0.... CONCRETE WOOD DECKING I-> 0 STONE WALL GRAPHIC SCALE __J 20 "° I inch =20 ft. :::> PROJECT NO: 1723 DRWN BY: JMF ICHK'O BY: MSW DATE: Ol.19.lB ~ ...... ~ NOTE: INFORMATION IN THESE DOCUMENTS IS NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A BUILDING C2.0 PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. ; ...... : ( ( ( f 1 - I LEGEND s:. - ----/----s: \ / --\ \ I Proposed Catchment A I 2,000 sf (to drywell) I PROPOSED DRYWELL Existing Catchment I (historic building) Existing Soakage Trench PROPOSED GRAVEL ------•• . s: PARKING I • I ,- -~ 1 .... ;::; ...... - ._ 1 - - ~ - ~j ------a;::B_ i- - ~ u 0 GRAPHIC SCALE CATCHMENT MAP 0 30 60 1"=30' I I I 1 inch = 30 ft. SET FRAME IN NON-SHRINK GROUT DRYWELL TESTING NOTES BOLT DOWN _AT- ··. -~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i!: Q (READING IN CUBIC FEET / MINUTE), PIPING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. D D D D D LLJ REINFORCED PRE-CAST a 0 6. CLEAN WATER SHALL BE PROVIDED TO TEST DRYWELLS, AS CONG. SECTIONS AND LID. -.l c:) -.l APPROVED, INTRODUCTION OF SEDIMENT MAY RESULT IN FAILURE OF CONFORM TO ASTM C478 ('J D 0 D D D ~ THE DRYWELL CAPACITY TEST. ~ >- D 0 D D D ~ 0:::: (.Q a 7. FILL DRYWELL WITH WATER AT AN INITIAL RATE OF 100 GPM. EVERY D 0 D D D FIVE (5) MINUTES RECORD WATER ELEVATION. MEASURE HEIGHT FROM RIM OF TOP RING TO WATER SURFACE. WHEN WATER 3/4" TO 2-1/2" D D D D D SURFACE IN DRYWELL REACHES A CONSTANT ELEVATION, INCREASE WASHED, CRUSHED FLOW RA TE TO 400 GPM AND RECORD ELEVA T/ONS. CONTINUE TO STONE OR GRAVEL D D D D D INCREASE FLOW RA TE BY 200 GPM ONCE THE WATER SURFACE ____,___ BOTTOM ELEV. = RE-STABILIZES, UNTIL CAPACITY IS EXCEEDED OR DRYWELL TOP ELEV. -DEPTH OPERA TES AT 600 GPM, WHICHEVER IS CREA TER. MAXIMUM DRYWELL CAPACITY IS THE FLOW RA TE FOR THE STABLE CONDITION SET PRIOR L TO RA TE AT WHICH CAPACITY WAS EXCEEDED. 12" 48"¢ 5" MIN. DRYWELL NTS Appendix B Support Calculations HydroCad Report ( 1S -t> Roof Area Drywells Routing Diagram for View Point Inn Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Company, Printed 1/18/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 09142 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC View Point Inn Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Company Printed 1/18/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 09142 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 2,000 98 (1 S) 2,000 98 TOTAL AREA View Point Inn Type IA 24-hr 1Oyr Rainfal/=3.40" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Company Printed 1/18/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 sin 09142 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-30.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 601 points Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/lmperv. Reach routing by Stor-lnd+ Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-lnd method Subcatchment1S: Roof Area Runoff Area=2,000 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.17" Tc=5.0 min CN=0/98 Runoff=0.04 cfs 528 cf Pond 2P: Drywells Peak Elev=107.20' Storage=146 cf lnflow=0.04 cfs 528 cf Outflow=0.01 cfs 528 cf Total Runoff Area= 2,000 sf Runoff Volume= 528 cf Average Runoff Depth =3.17" 0.00% Pervious = 0 sf 100.00% Impervious = 2,000 sf ( View Point Inn Type IA 24-hr 1Oyr Rainfal/=3.40" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Company Printed 1/18/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 sin 09142 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Pond 2P: Drywells Inflow Area= 2,000sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3 .17" for 1Oyr event Inflow = 0.04 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 528 cf Outflow = 0.01 cfs @ 9.40 hrs, Volume= 528 cf, Atten= 75%, Lag= 90.5 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 9.40 hrs, Volume= 528 cf Routing by Star-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs I 2 Peak Elev= 107.20'@ 9.40 hrs Surf.Area= 38 sf Storage= 146 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 220.3 min calculated for 527 cf (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 220.4 min ( 885.2 - 664.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 100.00' 126 cf 4.00'0x10.00'H Vertical Cone/Cylinder Inside #2 #2 100.00' 78 cf 7.00'0 x 10.00'H Vertical Cone/Cylinder 385 cf Overall - 126 cf Embedded = 259 cf x 30.0% Voids 203 cf Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 100.00' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Wetted area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs@ 9.40 hrs HW=107.20' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Pond 2P: Drywells Hydrograph 0.04 Inflow 0.04 cfs l"nflow Area=2,000 sf • Discarded 0.035 Peak Elev=107 .20' 0.03 Storage=146 cf -.!!! 0.025 0 -3: 0.02 0 u. 0.015 - 0.01 0.005 0 I l l' I ' ' 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Time (hours) NPS Form 10·900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (J.,,2) ( (, Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic PJ .ac_e_s~=:.x~~=eleived FEB 1 1985 Inventory-Nomination Form I et teentered FEB 2 8 1985 See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms B!O Z 9 i N'vT Type all entries-complete applicable sections _ 1. Name L:::... · . ' historic View Poi n't Inn and:or common Same 2. Location street & number 40301 NE Larch Mountain Road fifA- not for publication II i " I ' . 1! .. ._. ' ; .. ,I city, town Corbett ..Njll,vicinityof Third Congressional District state Oregon code 41 county Multnomah code 051 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use _district _public L-occupied _ agriculture _museum _X_ building(s) __X_ private _ unoccupied _commercial _park _structure _both _ work in progress _ educational --X- private residence _site Public Acquisition Accessible _ entertainment _religious _ object #/-A in process Lyes: restricted _ government _ scientific *IA being considered __ yes: unrestricted _ industrial _ transportation _no _military _other: 4. Owner of Property name Karen and Douglas Wats street & number 40301 NE Larch Mountain Road city, town Corbett N..f.A- vicinity of state Oregon 97019 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Mlltnomah County Courthouse street & number 1021 SliJ Fourth city, town Portland state Oregon 97204 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Multnomah County title Planning Re~s~o~l~u~t~i~onLL-~~~-ha_s_t_h_is~p_ro~p_e_rt~y_b_ee_n_d_e_te__ r_m_in_e_d_e_h~·g_ib_le_?~ -~·~ye_s~~X '---n_o date 1980 _ federal _state --X- county _ local -~--~~~---'-=c..=..=c~~~~~~~~~~~·-~~~~~~ Multnomah County Department of Environmental Services depository for survey records (Planning Commission file~ _cl_ty_,t_ow_n~~~~~~~~~~~Po_r_t_l_an_d~~~~~~~~--s_ta_te~Or_e~g_on~_=-i_ ~ E~~~~T 7 •' Description Condition Check one Check one _x_ excellent _ deteriorated L unaltered __x_ original site _go~ _ruins _altered _moved date ____JJJA~----~-- _ fair _ unexposed ~e~c1e~l present and original (if k~;~nJ-~hysical appearance ----- The distinctive View Point Inn (1924) is significant as an architectural feature and prominent landmark along the Columbia River Gorge. It is of particular interest as the best preserved example of 1920s tourist inns remaining along the lower section of the historic Columbia River Scenic Highway. The large white shingle structure in the A.rts and Crafts style, is nestled on Thor's Heights between Portland Women's Forum Park and Vista House (National Register property). The inn is visible from the park vantage point and has a panoramic view of the Columbia River. Thor's Heights promontory at the site of the hotel is 1125' above sea level. The inn is situated on .96 acres at the junction of the old Columbia River Highway (National Register Historic District) and Larch Mountain Road (formerly Brower Road). The property comprises Lots 1 and 2, Thor's Heights, in Sections 30 and 31, Township 1 North, Range. 5 East of tbe Willamette Meridian, Multnomah County, Oregon. Landscaping of the property is roughly'semi-tircular, reachi~g ffom the wes~~rn e~p~s~re of the inn (primary f~cade) to the edge of the ridge of Thor's Heights}. A few old plantings, including baby roses, are visible where the lawn expanse meets the underbrush. Two rock-faced terraces are articulated with small rock-faced piers and a walkway sloped from the verandah to the generous lawn. Near the western edge of the lawn is a large circular stone-faced pond (unfilled) surrounded by j~~ses. To the south of the prop~rty bordering Larch Mountain Road are various mature plantings including a 25' boxwood hedge; two variegated pink weigelia; two white hawthorne; and a long row of pine trees. Near the pine hedge is a single fir tree. At the far north edge of the property is a 10' x 20 1 wooden storage shed (thought to be original), with a new shake roof. At present, landscape maintenance has been deferred, due to more urgent structural maintenance necessary to stabilize the inn. Designed by architect Carl L. Linde, the massive wooden structure exhibits elements of Tudor style, but may be more aptly identified as a belated example of the A~ts and Crafts style. The building, according to its second owner, was constructed at a cost of $47,000. It has a large, prominent gabled roof, gabled roof dormers, and gabled wings. The main volume of the inn measures approximately 62 1 x 30'. All porches, all exterior walls, and the major interior first floor walls are of heavy timber construction. The exterior is sheathed with wood shingles, 5i" to the weather. Boards are applied to the walls to amplify the half-timbered effect. Shingles are painted off-white and timbers are painted dark brown,a close resemblance to the original white and black color scheme. Most of the original multi-light windows and doors remain, although several upper story windows are thermal-paned wood sash replacements. On the west, or primary facade, three gabled dormers are featured in the flared, ortbell cast, shake roof. The lower portion of the huge sloping roof covers a 10' verandah which was once screened and used as an additional dining area. This verandah has five bays. There are triple posts at each corner and paired posts between. The 1H" x 1H" posts are secured to the concrete foundation by steel plates. The verandah ceiling is (continued) United States fSepartment of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places lnventory-Hcminaticn Form Continuation sheet VIEW POINT INN Item number 7 Page 2 finished with 3! 11 tongue and groove boards with beveled edges. The wood floor is a recent restoration. To maximize the western view of the river, Linde provided five 15-light French doors with sidelights between the verandah and the great hall. On the southwest of the main gable is a smaller extension of the main gable which features a sunporch at the ground elevation. This 12' x 22' room has multi paned window and door openings. The rear, or east elevation, contains two gabled wings with multi-light windows and a gabled roof dormer. Tudor detailing is evidenced in contrasting color roof rakings and vertical boards. There is a door leading to the kitchen from the outermost projecting wing; another door is at the north end of the southe~n exposure. A large red brick chimney with four chimney pots is located in the center of the main gable. At the far end of the east elevation is a flat roof double· garage with double bi-folding doors containing multi-light windows. An unpaved road serves as a drive-way along this portion of the inn. The north elevation is comparatively plain with the garage projection~ two multi-light French doors (leading to the great hall); and three fixed multi- light sash at the end of the verandah at the ground elevation. Above, at the second story elevation, are three wood sash windows. The structure rests on a concrete foundation and has a basement measuring 978 square feet. The ground floor interior contains approximately 2320 square feet. Facing the west and the verandah is the intact great hall, formerly the inn dining room, which measures 61.5' x 21'. The great hall originally contained approximately 30 dining tables to seat 125 dining patrons. It has 14' high ceilings and 7'5 11 high fir veneer paneling with mouldings accented in orange and green. The flooring is 2! 11 maple. Load bearing posts are covered by pilasters. Upper walls and ceilings are finished in white wall board, though the original finish was sand finished plaster. In the center of the east wall is an arched fireplace constructed of river and volcanic rock. The fireplace has a mantle with cavetto mouldings at top and bottom. Each bay of the great hall contains a pendant light fixture thought to be designed by lighting expert Fred Baker. These original fixtures are circular with six candles attached to a wrought iron rim and suspended with black chain. Two other original fixtures are located in the two center exterior bays leading to the verandah. These are simple wall sconces and were apparently suplied by Baker's lighting firm. To the right of the fireplace are original double doors leading to the serving room and kitchen beyond. Both areas have been renovated; the opening between the two smaller rooms has been enlarged, creating a larger continuous space and exposing heavy timber framing previously plastered over. This is the only spatial change in the structure. The former serving area retains a large walk-in wooden freezer and wooden fir flooring. To the north of the freezer is the former women's restroom and a powder room, presently used for storage. United States a'epartment of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places lnventory-Hcmination Form Continuation sheet VIEW PO INT INN Item number 7 Page 3 Access to the small entrance hall is gained from the east end of the great hall, or through the sun porch (which was an overflow dining area). The mens' restroom off the entrance hall has been remodeled with modern plumbing fixtures. From the entrance hall is an elbow stairway with simple fir newel post and plain fir balusters leading to the second story. The upper level of the inn contains approximately 1683 square feet with four bedrooms and two bathrooms in their configuration. Between the major bedrooms at each end is a large sitting room with a fireplace flanked by two large bookcases. The fireplace is of orange glazed tile surrounded by fluted pilasters and a mantle resting on scroll brackets. All woodwork including baseboards and ceiling moulding are painted wh1te~ The floors are of 2i 11 maple. There are two original white wall sconces mounted beside the fireplace, and two single light white pendant ceiling fixtures {perhaps supplied by the Fred Baker firm) in the sitting room. Original door hardware and light switches have been retained, as well as a claw-footed bath tub in the northeast bathroom. Historically, the bedrooms and the sitting room, which could contain ~bout twelve cots, accommodated as many as 26 overnight guests. An expansive view of the western gorge slope was offered to the guests .from dormer window openings in the north and south bedrooms, and from the commodious sitting room. 8. Significanc~ Period Areas of Significance-Check and justify below __ prehistoric ___ archeology-prehistoric ___ community planning __ landscape architecture_ religion ___ 1400--1499 _archeology-historic __ conservation __ law _science ___ 1500--1599 ____ agriculture ____ economics ___ literature _sculpture -·· 1600--1699 _X_ architecture ____ education ___ military ___ social/ -- 1700--1799 ___ art _____ engineering _ music humanitarian -- 1800--1899 _ commerce ____ exploration/settlement _ philosophy __ theater __x__ 1900-- _ communications ___ industry __ politics/government _ transportation ____ invention ...... -X-- other (specify) -----·------(tourism) Specificdates 1924 , Builder/Architect George Alfred Canzler (builderL.____ ------CarT L-.Linde (architect) Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) The View Point Inn (originally named the Palmer Place), prominently situated on Thor's Heights near Corbett, is located on the old Columbia River Highway one mile west of Vista House at Crown Point and three quarters of a mile east of the Portland Women's Forum Park. Constructed in 1924 at the junction of the scenic highway and Larch Mountain Road, for Grace H. Palmer, the inn was operated until 1962. Constructed in direct response to the rise of automobile touring and the development of the Columbia River Gorge Highway, the View Point Inn is eligible under Criterion "a." As the only inn remaining intact from the galaxy of resorts built near Crown Point, it meets Criterion "c." The inn is additionally significant under Criterion ".c'~ __ as the,.only known inn designed by Carl L. Linde, one of Oregon's foremost architects. The inn was the result of the growth of automobile tourism in the Columbia River Gorge. This industry derived from the ''Good Roads Movement" (the ideal of constructing hard surfaced roads to benefit farmers, industrialists, and tourists) that arose shortly before the First World War (1914-1918). The eccentric millionaire Samuel C. Hill conceiv~d the idea of a scenic highway along the south bank of the Columbia River. In 1913, Oregon responded to Hill's vision by creating a State Highway Department. The department hired a brilliant engineer, Samuel C. Lancaster, to build the highway. When completed in 1915 it was widely hailed as an aesthetic and engineering masterpiece. Lancaster began to advertise the tourist potential of the highway on a trip to the Eastern states in 1916 and 1917. As Hill put it, "we will cash in, year after year, on our crop of scenic beauty, without depleting it in any way." Among the jewels of the highway and a focal point for tourists were Vista House and Crown Point. Crown Point is a basaltic promontory of the Columbia Gorge. It was one of the two sites where the highway was dedicated between Troutdale and Hood River in 1916. Atop Crown Point stands the Vista House (1918), an observation point for the Gorge. Vista House was designed by the architect Edgar Lazarus following Samuel Lancaster's suggestion that an observation point be placed at Crown Point. Famous resort inns such as the Chanticleer Inn on the site of the Portland Women's Forum Park, the Crown Point Chalet above Vista House, the Wayfarer Inn in Corbett, and Faresh H~ll in Bridleveil arose to serve the tourists. From Portland, rental touring cars and limousines were available from the Columbia River and City Sightseeing Service to bring tourists to the area. (continued) ' -. 9~ Major Biblio~1aphical Reference_ See Continuation Sheet 1 O. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated property ----'--''9'-"6 ____ _ Quadrangle name Bridal Veil, Washington - Oregon Quadrangle scale --=l~:6=2=-=5'"""0_,,_0 ___ UT M References l515 5 01 l5 0l4 2j2 0 01 0 A~ 1sp 1 1 1 1 1 1 W I I 1 I I I I I I Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing c LU .__I.__I .____I ..__I ...... __.__~...... oli.J .__I I.__.__.__._! I.__..~...... ~ E LLJ I I II.__....__.___.__.. __ FLU I I I I I I G Li.J I I I .__I ....__._~-- H LJ,J'.) .I ..I. .I t I -I Verbalboundarydescriptionandjustification The View Point Inn occupies Lots 'i f1t 2 of Thor's Heights, Multnomah County~ Oregon, ~hich are located in Sections 30 & 31 of TIN, R5E, W.M., Multnomah County, Oregon. List all states and counties for properties overlapping state or county boundaries state ffone code county code state code county code 11. Form Prepared By name/title Linda Docid.5 organization Hi story Resources date June 30 1934 street&number 1665 NW 131st Avenue telephone ( 501) 644-B The evaluated significance of this property within the state is: _ national __ state _l_ local As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the Nation I 665), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the National according to the criteria and procedures set forth by the National State Historic Preservation Officer signature title Deputy State Historic date January 9, 1985 For NPS use only I hereby certify that this property is I eluded In the National. Register Entere! 'tii ·au date date Chief of Registration r_f'\UP'Ol\JMPN'T' PRTN'T'TN~ ()FFTrR = 1983 0 - 419-311 United States Department~· of the Interior. Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places lnventory-Ncminaticn Form Continuation sheet VI EW PO INT INN Item number 8 Page 2 In the 1920s tourism in Pmerica became democratized and big business because of the "Good Roads Movement," the inexpensive mass-produced automobne pioneered by Henry Ford and his competitors, a higher standard of living, a reduced work week, and a desire to escape the pressures of urban life. In 1920 every other car in the world was a Model T. In 1925 the Ford Motor Company made an automobile every 10 seconds. By the end of the Twenties the Model T cost its lowest price ever, $290. Paradoxically, millions of Pmerians rushed by machine to places of natural beauty to flee a mechanizing nation. Henry Ford himself took a series of camping trips in the years 1914-1924 in the company of Thomas Edison, naturalist John Burroughs, and rubber tire magnate Harvey Fireston¢. View Point Inn is a result of these developments. It is constructed on land originally owned by Lorens Lund. A Danish immigrant, Lund had come to the United States in 1870 where he met his Norwegian wife, Mari, who had arrived in 1859. The Lunds acquired 120 acres of land in 1884 and 1895 under the Homestead Act. Their acreage was located overlooking Crown Point in an area they eventually p_latted as Thor's Heights, in honor of the mythological Scandinavian deity who lived on a high place (Breidablikk) overlooking the entire world. In 1914 the Lunds donated a por tion of their property to Multnomah County for highway purposes. They, Osmond Ryal, and George B. Van Waters, also gave to the City of Portland in 1917 the pro perty where Vista House stands. Much of the Lunds' land was sold after 1917 and the site of the later View Point Inn was acquired by the Grace H. Palmer Corporation in 1924. Grace Palmer and her associates, who included Fred Heilig of the theater family, opened the inn on 4 June 1925. The inn, named the Palmer Place, was de signed by Carl Linde in the mode of a Shingle Style resort inn with half-timber de tail. ft was intended to be a tea room and restaurant (specializing in chicken dinners) with facilities for private parties. In spite of its attractive design and charming setting 1125 feet above the Columbia River, Grace Palmer and her chil dren, Geraldine and Harry, were not successful in managing the Palmer Place. Their property was repossessed by the Union Savings and Loan Association and passed into the hands of William Moessner in 1927. His wife, Clara, assisted him in the running of the inn. Moessner, a native of Pforzheim, Germany, was an experienced restaurateur He had served as chef de cuisine at the Benson and Portland hotels before buying the Palmer Place which""lle renamed the View Point Inn. His enterprise advertised such diversions as hiking, fishing, and boating. During the prosperous Twenties and the depressed Thirties the Inn drew many guests, some of them famous. Julius Meier, the department store magnate and governor of Oregon (1931-1935),came frequently to breakfast. Meier's Menucha estate (extant) was one mile to the west of View Point Inn. On one occasion the governor accompanied delegates from a California Soroptomist convention to a banquet at the inn. One of the guest books, in possession of the current owners, records the names of Prince Friedrich .., . United States Department of the lntenor Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination Form Continuation sheet VIEW P0 INT INN Item number 8 Paga 3 of Potsdam (son of the former Crown Prince of Germany), Baron and Baroness Blixens-Fenicke of Denmark, and Baroness Ellen of Sweden. Lily Pons, Andre Kostelanetz,, and Thomas Dewey were also reported to have been guests. The Inn, open all year, was quite luxurious and its guests paid as high or higher rates as at the Columbia Gorge Hotel, Cloud Cap Inn, and Timberline Lodge in the 1930s. The Second World War, with its gas rationing and shortage of labor, ended these prosperous days. The Inn was closed. Although William Moessner reopened his inn after the war, it was only a temporary reprieve for it.· When the new Columbia River Highway (now Interstate 84) was opened in the 1950s, ~raffic bypassed the View Point Inn. Moessner served the inn's last meal in 1962. After his death on 11 September 1979 the property passed to his nephew, Erwin Goeltz,who sold the property to Douglas and Karen Watson in 1982. Carl L. Linde (1867-1945) became an active figure in Portland area architec tural design. Irmligrating with his family from Germany at the age of six, Linde settled in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He attended the German-English Academy and, while enrolled there, the young man also became apprenticed as an architect. Linde's early career is largely undocumented, though it has been recorded that he was a brewery architect in Milwaukee and was a staff architect for Ryerson Steel in Chicago. After his arrival in Oregon in 1906, he became a draftsman for Edgar Lazarus, who designed the Vista House (National Register listed and HABS property) in 1916. Before he obtained his architectural license in 1921, Linde worked for the firms of Whidden and Lewis, A.E. Doyle, and Whitehouse and Fouilhoux. Beginning in 1921, Linde maintained his own architectural firm, and specialized in the design of residences, beach houses, apartment houses, and schools. His large apartment de signs were favored with diplomatic names, such as the Jacobethan style Ambassador (1922) and the Twentieth Century style Sovereign (1922), both of which are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. English and Mediterranean elements were conman in the forms created by the architect. The Royal Arms, Imperial Arms, Hamilton Arms, the Embassy, and the Envoy were also designed by Linde. His Ongford apartment, however, is early modern stylistically. Two garden court apartments, the National Register listed Holman Gardens (1928) of the halftimber style, and the 1923 Irvington Court Apartments in the Jacobethan style, reflect further diversity in the architect's creative design. His flexibility as an artist is also apparent in the 1926 Portland North Park.Block sand stone and bronze fountain entitled "Rebecca at the Well" (Shemanski Fountain) which he designed with sculptor Oliver Barrett. Linde also produced large, stately houses, including the 1932 Jack L. Eassen residence in Norman Farmhouse style; the 1928 Spanish Colonial Otto Poole house; United States fSepartment of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination Form Continuation sheet VI EkJ PO INT IM N Item number 8 Page 4 the Tudor-style Zimnerman home of 1928; the 1926 Jack Barde residence of Mediter ranean design; and the 1926 English cottage of Dr. Frank McCauley. Linde was vice-president of the Oregon chapter, AIA, in 1934, and director of the Society of Registered Architects in 1935. At the beginning of the Second World War he became associated with the Corps of Engineers, United State Army, at Van couver Barracks, and worked there until his death at age 78 in 1945. Linde designed the View Point Inn in 1924. Originally known as the Palmer Place, the inn was comnissioned and built at a reported expense of $47,000. by Grace H. Palmer. The View Point is the only tourist resort structure known to 1 have been designed by Linde, though several beach houses were designed by the architect during his career. The massive shingle inn is a distinct departure from the Tudor or Mediterranean style structures of brick and reinforced concrete comnonly created by Li~de. Linde's architectural connection with the Columbia River Gorge area·apparently began some years prior to the development of the View Point Inn. In 1917 the ar chitect designed a giant arch as a gateway, or formal entrance, to the Columbia River Highway. Though the arch was never executed, it was to have been a monu mental structure featuring the Oregon shield that "each passing motorist ••• [might] find something to remind him of his native state and make him feel at home." United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places lnventory-Ncmination Ferm Continuation sheet VI EW PO I NT INN Item number 9 Paga 1 Bibliography A. Books Lancaster, S.C. The Columbia: America 1 s Great Highway Through the Cascade Mountains to the Sea. 3rd. ed. Portland: J.D. Gill Company, 1926. Nash, Roderick. From These Beginnings: A Biographical Approach to American History. 3rd ed. vol .. 2. New York: Harper and Row, 1984. Withey, Henry F. and Elsie R. Withey, eds. Biographical Directory of American Architects (Deceased). Los Angeles: Hennessey and Ingalls, 1970. B. Government Documents Lancaster, Samuel C. 11 The Columbia River Highway in Multnomah County, 11 in First Annual Report of the State Highway Engineer. Salem: n.p., 1914. Multnomah County. Deed Book 667, . 449. 1914. Multnomah County Courthouse. Oregon State Highway Commission. Nineteenth Biennial Report, 1940-50. Salem: State Printing Department, 1950. Portland. Historic Resources Inventory. 1983. C. Newsp.apers 11 Carl L. Linde Dies in Sleep, 11 Oregon Journal (Portland), 13 July 1945. 11 Gateway is Proposed for Formal Entrance to Columbia River Highway, 11 Sunday Ore onian (Portland), 7 Jan. 1917. Outlook Gresham, OR.). 16 Dec. 1924, 29 May 1925; 5 Dec. 1930; 7 June, 2 Sept. 1923; 1 Dec. 1933. McCarthy, Dennis, 11 Memories of Old Inn Still Linger, 11 Oregon Journal (Portland), '14 Nov. 1972. Pacific Northwest Hotel News (Portland), 20 Dec. 1924; 6 June 1925. Pintarich, Paul, 11 Landmark Nominees Wanted, 11 Morning Oregonian (Portland) 10 July 1980. D. Interviews Baker, Fred C. Interview with Sheila Finch-Tepper, 5 July 1978. Oregon Historical Society Oral History Collection. Canzler, Elizabeth B. Interview with Linda S. Dodds, 27 June 1984 (telephone). Davis, Delbert F. Interview with Linda S. Dodds, 14 May 1984 (telephone). Finch-Tepper, Sheila. Interview with Linda S. Dodds, 30 May 1984. Graff, Beatrice. Interview with Linda S. Dodds, 9 May 1984 (telephone). Nesbit, Sharon. Interview with Gordon B. Dodds, 10 May; 1 June 1984 (telephone). PH~ 111-711 United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination Ferm Continuation sheet VIEW PO I NT INN Item number 9 Page ? E. Ephemera and Unpublished Material Columbia River Highway Project. Vista House Historic Structure Report. Cascade Locks, OR: n.p., 1981. Finch-Tepper, Sheila. Nomination of the Ambassador Hotel to the National Register of Historic Places. 1983. Portland Chamber of Commerce. Oregon Resorts, 1936, 1938. Smith, Dwight A. Nomination of the Columbia River Highway Historic District to the National Register of Historic Places. 1983. View Point Hotel Business Card. 1934. Troutdale Historical Society. view Point Inn 40301 ~F Larch Mountain Road The sketch below is mode ~ •Y for the purpose of ossisfin9 i Corbett tultnomah Co., Oregon •... =1;,.i-.;lity for variotions, if ony, in dimensions and location ascert1 Pioneer National Title Insurance Company A TICOR COMPANY - 8 . ..• "" I .L \ ' l.. - --/31J.(U.- '- - - '8) 14.92. 4c . -1 'I View Point Inn 40301 NE 'arch Mountain Road Corbett, Jltnomah Co., Oregon i1 S~~G ~~ lJ '9fDi'46C ------, I SECOND FLOOR GJ.JU(;;E Gl'nCJZ.t-f ...... 11.ADIS.~' ~ ·*-~ :t v ~J\~1n ~i' fl., Ill MJfAT 1+4U- ~ . .1.lT, "' !II ,,...... ,.Uf ~i .I ~~ ~ .... ~l!rtYJN• ~~ P.AMTltV \JV ll'lt'c:tflfN in t(ow~ ~~ lJ. ~ ..... N· ~ UTILl'IY ~· - _,...~ eN(.l..~ -l!OlUM FIR ST FLOOR View Point Inn Photo l 1r-1:. Corbett, Oregon Photographer Unknown c. 1960 Reposi torya Oregon Hiato.rica:l Sic. Vit!w eastl7ly of Columbia R. Gc)rge and Crown Point View Point Inn lower right, Vista House nEtar center;· IZ ~O.'~vu P"""-""-~li. ?mn..~n, tJ"f.. ?7lh"i nus PH ,.), : 1 i r·-; FOR \H \ 1~- p1. '"· L ! n:',!en· F. '·. () n n ~\, t 2,~US VV PUHTLA.1. U ' .. NEG/\TlVE j( ' 1 View Point Inn Pho·to 2*11... Corbett, Oregon, Mu1..rtv"Mll H- C.r>t.uvT"-1 Photographer unknown C • t9o0 ,.,..,,,,.-i4SS Reposi tory1 Douglas Watson - vtllVhNVwYu View north. Columbia Ri~r Seenic Highway to left, Vista House near upper right. View Point Inn Photo JbFI~ Corbett, Oregon, /C1.uLl/\JtJl--tlfH- Ce>uN'r'( Greg Brody, Photographer 1 May 1984 Repositorya Linda Dodds Western facade of View Point Inn /~64{NW 1"31 ~;-~'1..>U-L- p IP'l n.,.A-Nl"J, m CJ7 72; View Point Inn Photo 5~F Corbett, Oregcm )~t..rN~M11-H-r!OftNT'?'"L Greg Brody, Photographer f 1 May 1984 Reposi torya Linda S. ·-Dodds Front verandah looking south. /(,/,'-( /U[JJ I? I ~I111/lt.AJUL. ?ni:rz.IM.JI? > Ort " 72 z..I View Point Inn Photo 6'F Corbett, Oregon.)hut.~tLtlflf-C..ou~ryl'Z Greg Brody, Photographer 1 May 1984 Reposi torya Linda S. "Pod.ds Western expasure to left, and. south gable end to right. I (.,{p ;( N w I 3 I SI lf ?()nn..'1-N~,on C)7zz / View Point Inn Photo 7c~I~ Corbett, Oregon,Mu1-rN p~rz..,tt1V0~012. t:J7zz; View Point Inn Garage Photo 8Cf/L Corbett, Oregon, ""1.ut.rNcMlflt- CPt/N1"'7 Greg Brody, Photographer 1 May 1984 Repository1 Linda s. Dodds View of garage located off eastern · exposure of View Point Inn. J £1(, <' N 1A..J /~{ 'S I .f-<.}i\Ah.c"'-. ? IJ11T'h IWVO ~tJ"t- t:j 7 2.2..7 View Point Inn Photo 9 op1L Corlrett, Oregon 1 µ,uL7ivdMlfH- C.OUN'T'? Greg Brody, Photographer 1 May 1984 Repository1 Linda s. Dodds Southern exposure of View Point Inn (to right); garage to left. I &t,,'-{ /\./ llJ I "3 I ~I lfU ltNU.t_ Pon n.MUn J trn- "l 7 2. 2. i View Point Inn Photo 10. Corbett, Oregon 1J1.t.u,7'Voklf N-c,,,...... PF 1.: Greg Brody. Photographer --~~ 1 May 1984 . · . . Repositorya Linda s. Dodds View to. the west from the verandah.· Columbia River to righti Portland Women's Forum Park in center. 1(/1(,t{ NW I 2>/'>I 4·<.hf.VU-i.... /' P'1'tn. IHV r,) 1 IJ'17_ CJ7 2 l / .· J '" View Point Inn Photo 11. conett, Oregon,M«~;A10,..,_.1t-6'uMt,j~Pit- Greg Brody, Photographer I · l May 1984 . . Repositorya Linda s. Dodds View !acing west .froa-the View Point Inna stine f'aeed pond in foreground1 Columbia River in background to right J(I{.,~NW I ?I -sr ,lf-u~NU-t_ Ptm n.,lfAJr.> I ()11.. Cf7 z z./ View Point Inn Photo 12. Corbett, Oregon,~'-'N"""'"'·f-cau~F''L Greg Brody, Photograph~r ,.._, 1 May 1984 Repository1 Linda S. Dodds View of so~theastportion of lots includes plantings of pine trees, boxwood hedge, and pink weigelia. /(,~"tVW I~ I sr ;f.- /")px n..lfNr; 1 on t:t 7 z z; ( ( • Ticor Title Company of Oregon Order No. 36261800025 IJ TICOR l]!!:,§'" 1433 SW 6th Ave. (503 )646-4444 OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCES REPORT WITH GENERAL INDEX LIENS Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrances To ("Customer"): HSF, LLC P.O. Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 Customer Ref.: 40301 E Larch Mountain Road Order No.: 36261800025 Effective Date: December 28 , 2017 at 08:00 AM Charge: $350.00 The information contained in this report is furnished by Ticor Title Company of Oregon {the "Company") as a real property information service based on the records and indices maintained by the Company for the county identified below. THIS IS NOT TITLE INSURANCE OR A PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FOR, OR COMMITMENT FOR, TITLE INSURANCE. No examination has been made of the title to the herein described property, other than as specifically set forth herein. Liability for any loss arising from errors and/or omissions is limited to the lesser of the charge· or the actual loss, and the Company will have no greater liability by reason of this report. THIS REPORT IS SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY STATED BELOW, WHICH LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ARE A PART OF THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT INCLUDES MONETARY AND NON-MONETARY ENCUMBRANCES. Part One - Ownership and Property Description Owner. The apparent vested owner of property ("the Property") as of the Effective Date is: HSF. LLC, an Oregon limited liability com pany Premises. The Property is: (a) Street Address: 40301 E Larch Mountain Road , Corbett, OR 97019 (b) Legal Description: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF / 8l OZ 9 g Nv'r Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrances (Ver. 20161024) EXHIBIT A.24 ( · Ticor Title Company of Oregon ( OrderNo. 36261800025 Part Two - Encumbrances Encumbrances. As of the Effective Date, the Property appears subject to the following monetary and non-monetary encumbrances of record, not necessarily listed in order of priority, including liens specific to the subject property and general index liens (liens that are not property specific but affect any real property of the named person in the same county): EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes, including current year, have been assessed with an exemption. If the exempt status is terminated under the statute prior to the date on which the assessment roll becomes the tax roll in the year in which said taxes were assessed, an additional tax may be levied. Exemption: (24H2) Historic Property 2 Term Tax Account No. : R287200 Note: Property taxes for the fiscal year shown below are paid in full. Fiscal Year: 2017-18 Amount: $3,442.88 Levy Code: 074 Account No. : R287200 Map No.: 1N5E30CC-01600 2. Rights of the public to any portion of the Land lying within the area commonly known as streets, roads and highways 3. Conditions and Restrictions as established by Multnomah County: Purpose: Land Use Hearing Ordinance NoFile No.: T3-06-006 Recording Date: November 28, 2006 Recording No.: 2006-219397 Re-recording Date: December 22, 2006 Recording No.: 2006-236535 4. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: December 14, 2006 Recording No: 2006-231280 5. Historic Property Special Assessment Notice Recording Date: May 14, 2013 Recording No.: 2013-065747 End of Reported Information There will be additional charges for additional information or copies. For questions or additional requests, contact: Kevin Kimball 503-469-4168 Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrances (Ver. 20161024) ( Ticor Title Company of Oregon OrderNo. 36261800025 [email protected] Ticor Title Company of Oregon 1433 SW 6th Ave. Portland, OR 97201 Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrances (Ver. 20161024) ( ( EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description Lots 1 and 2. Block 1. REPLAT OF PARTS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2. THOR'S HEIGHTS, in the County of Multnomah and State of Oregon. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion lying within the limits of the Columbia River Highway. Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrances (Ver. 20161024) ( Ticer Title Company of Oregon Order No. 36261800025 LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY "CUSTOMER" REFERS TO THE RECIPIENT OF THIS REPORT. CUSTOMER EXPRESSLY AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF LOSS WHICH COULD ARISE FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN, OR THE COMPANY'S NEGLIGENCE IN PRODUCING, THE REQUESTED REPORT, HEREIN "THE REPORT." CUSTOMER RECOGNIZES THAT THE FEE CHARGED IS NOMINAL IN RELATION TO THE POTENTIAL LIABILITY WHICH COULD ARISE FROM SUCH ERRORS OR OMISSIONS OR NEGLIGENCE. THEREFORE, CUSTOMER UNDERSTANDS THAT THE COMPANY IS NOT WILLING TO PROCEED IN THE PREPARATION AND ISSUANCE OF THE REPORT UNLESS THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY IS STRICTLY LIMITED. CUSTOMER AGREES WITH THE PROPRIETY OF SUCH LIMITATION AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS THE LIMITATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS AND THE LIMITATIONS WILL SURVIVE THE CONTRACT: ONLY MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT AS THE SUBJECT OF THE REPORT ARE WITHIN ITS SCOPE. ALL OTHER MATTERS ARE OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE REPORT. CUSTOMER AGREES, AS PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE REPORT AND TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY, ITS LICENSORS, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, RESELLERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONTENT PROVIDERS AND ALL OTHER SUBSCRIBERS OR SUPPLIERS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES, AND SUBCONTRACTORS FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LIABILITIES, CAUSES OF ACTION, LOSSES, COSTS, DAMAGES AND EXPENSES OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S FEES, HOWEVER ALLEGED OR ARISING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE ARISING FROM BREACH OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, THE COMPANY'S OWN FAULT AND/OR NEGLIGENCE, ERRORS, OMISSIONS, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY, EQUITY, THE COMMON LAW, STATUTE OR ANY OTHER THEORY OF RECOVERY, OR FROM ANY PERSON'S USE, MISUSE, OR INABILITY TO USE THE REPORT OR ANY OF THE MATERIALS CONTAINED THEREIN OR PRODUCED, SO THAT THE TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY AND ITS AGENTS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES, AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL NOT IN ANY EVENT EXCEED THE COMPANY'S TOT AL FEE FOR THE REPORT. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THE FOREGOING LIMITATION ON LIABILITY IS A TERM MATERIAL TO THE PRICE THE CUSTOMER IS PAYING, WHICH PRICE IS LOWER THAN WOULD OTHERWISE BE OFFERED TO THE CUSTOMER WITHOUT SAID TERM. CUSTOMER RECOGNIZES THAT THE COMPANY WOULD NOT ISSUE THE REPORT BUT FOR THIS CUSTOMER AGREEMENT, AS PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN FOR THE REPORT, TO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND THAT ANY SUCH LIABILITY IS CONDITIONED AND PREDICATED UPON THE FULL AND TIMELY PAYMENT OF THE COMPANY'S INVOICE FOR THE REPORT. THE REPORT IS LIMITED IN SCOPE AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, TITLE OPINION, PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT, TITLE REPORT, COMMITMENT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE, OR A TITLE POLICY, AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AS SUCH. THE REPORT DOES NOT PROVIDE OR OFFER ANY TITLE INSURANCE, LIABILITY COVERAGE OR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS COVERAGE. THE REPORT IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE TO THE PROPERTY. THE COMPANY MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS AS TO THE REPORT'S ACCURACY, DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE REPORT, ASSUMES NO DUTIES TO CUSTOMER, DOES NOT INTEND FOR CUSTOMER TO RELY ON THE REPORT, AND ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OCCURRING BY REASON OF RELIANCE ON THE REPORT OR OTHERWISE. ~ {?Jo; !J 6 ·:{Q; -.. Nttr /;.. ·. Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrance s~ 0,J}). (Ver. 20161024) ~ ( Ticor Title Company of Oregon Order No. 36261800025 IF CUSTOMER (A) HAS OR WILL HAVE AN INSURABLE INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY, (B) DOES NOT WISH TO LIMIT LIABILITY AS STATED HEREIN AND (C) DESIRES THAT ADDITIONAL LIABILITY BE ASSUMED BY THE COMPANY, THEN CUSTOMER MAY REQUEST AND PURCHASE A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER, OR A COMMITMENT TO ISSUE A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE. NO ASSURANCE IS GIVEN AS TO THE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE OR STATUS OF TITLE. CUSTOMER EXPRESSLY AGREES AND ACKNOWLEDGES IT HAS AN INDEPENDENT DUTY TO ENSURE AND/OR RESEARCH THE ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE COMPANY OR ANY PRODUCT OR SERVICE PURCHASED. NO THIRD PARTY IS PERMITTED TO USE OR RELY UPON THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE REPORT, AND NO LIABILITY TO ANY THIRD PARTY IS UNDERTAKEN BY THE COMPANY. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL THE COMPANY, ITS LICENSORS, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, RESELLERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONTENT PROVIDERS, AND ALL OTHER SUBSCRIBERS OR SUPPLIERS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, OR LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUE, INCOME, SAVINGS, DATA, BUSINESS, OPPORTUNITY, OR GOODWILL, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, NON-OPERATION OR INCREASED EXPENSE OF OPERATION, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR DELAY, COST OF CAPITAL, OR COST OF REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS OR SERVICES, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH LIABILITY IS BASED ON BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, THE COMPANY'S OWN FAULT AND/OR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTIES, FAILURE OF ESSENTIAL PURPOSE, OR OTHERWISE AND WHETHER CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE, ERRORS, OMISSIONS, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY, THE COMPANY'S OWN FAULT AND/OR NEGLIGENCE OR ANY OTHER CAUSE WHATSOEVER, AND EVEN IF THE COMPANY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES OR KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF THE POSSIBILITY FOR SUCH DAMAGES. END OF THE LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY Informational Report of Ownership and Monetary and Non-Monetary Encumbrances (Ver. 20161024) ( Zf2,71' 116.42' 1700 1100 St:E CS 39061 4 ------c'\-2119.JB' --...... 139.75' \ ~ 3 ISO' O!ID' 1600 b ~ 2 ct I 1-1 I i 2 ca 6 J ~ 150' ' /25 :::::> t d -I ICIO' I 0 '' u / ft500 I a:; N Parcelid: R287200 This map/ plat is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described land in relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey A of the land depicted. Except to the extent a policy of title insurance is expressly modified by en dorsement, if any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. 1 /A/')(\10 r iupc;LLy 0u111111c11y ( Multnomah Assessor PROPERTY INFORMATION Owner Name Property ID # HSF LLC R287200 ~ Owner Address Map Tax Lot # . ~ PO BOX 70 1N5E30CC -01600 / CORBETT, OR 97019 <'--.... cP/ Situs Address Neighborhood 1 ·'C? ' ,~ .9 40301 E LARCH MOUNTAIN RD ROlO ' tf'/f/p,, CORBETT, OR 97019 /' Alternate Account Number Levy Code Area R832300010 074 Information on Ordering Copies Portland Maps http://www.portlandmaps.com Exemption Expiration Date (24H2) HISTORIC PROPERTY 2 TERM 2023 Tax Roll Description Map Number THORS HTS & RPLT, BLOCK 1, LOT 1, LOT 2 EXC PT IN HWY, 301N5E 1N5E30CC-01600 HISTORIC PROPERTY, POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TAX Parcel Property Use B - RESIDENTIAL IMPROVED Split/Merge Account Message Split/Merge Account Acreage Special Account Information Year Built Account Status 1925 A - Active Related Accounts Linked Accounts P437717,P466485, P466486, P620769, P624936 Deed Grantor (Seller) Grantee (Buyer) Instrument Date Consider Amt BSD FRUEHAUF,HEINER & HSF LLC 2016155958 12/14/16 $0 THOMPSON,GEOFFREY J WD FRUEHAUF,HEINER & 2016120979 09/27/16 $577,150 & THOMPSON,GEOFFREY J QCD SIMIONE,DONN A & 2011068357 06/15/11 $0 & BSD SIMIONE,DONN A SIMIONE,DONN A & 2007128510 07/17/07 $0 BSD THOMPSON ,GEOFF REY SIMIONE,DONN A 2007124401 07 /11/07 $0 BSD SIMIONE,DONN A SIMIONE,DONN A & 2006157945 08/24/06 $0 BSD SIMIONE,DONN A & SIMIONE,DONN A 2006155720 08/21/06 $0 BSD SIMIONE DONN A & SIMIONE,DONN A & 2006099486 05/31/06 $0 BSD SIMIONE,DONN A SIMIONE,DONN A & 2004207149 11/16/04 $0 BSD GABLE,JAN SIMIONE,DONN A & 2005021874 02/08/05 $0 WD GABLE,JANET L & SIMIONE,DONN A 2004179124 09/30/04 $650,000 BSD GABLE,JAN GABLE,JANET L & 2004109246 06/17/04 $0 WD W B OREGON INC GABLE,JAN 2004098929 06/02/04 $450,600 QCD WATSON,DOUGLAS T GABLE,JAN 2004098926 06/02/04 $0 QCD WATSON,KAREN A GABLE,JAN 2004098924 06/02/04 $0 BSD PNW LLC W B OREGON INC 2004098928 06/02/04 $0 EXD PNW LLC 2004098927 06/02/04 $600,000 1 / t1 /'H\1 Q r l U}lc;l LJ 0Ulllllla.l J MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF QCD WATSON,DOUGLAS T PNW LLC 2004098925 06/02/04 $0 QCD WATSON,KAREN A PNW LLC 2004098923 06/02/04 $0 MULTNOMAH COUNTY OTH PNW LLC 2004018509 02/05/04 $600,000 SHERIFF INST WATSON,DOUGLAS T & WATSON,DOUGLAS T & BP15490376 $0 Last Certified Year (2017) Information for R287200 Taxable Assessed Taxable Real Market Land Value Improvement Value Value Value $268,500 $268,500 $274,000 $76,680 Important Information About R287200 If applicable, the described property is receiving special valuation based upon its use. Additional rollback taxes which may become due based on the provisions of the special valuation are not indicated in this listing. Total Tax Payoff Amount Current Year Tax Owed I Interest Date I Total Tax Payoff Amount $0.ool 01/03/20181 $0.00 Current Property Tax Interest Third Begin Balance Amount Paid Taxes Paid Discount Date Paid Paid 1st 1,147.63 1,147.63 1,147.63 0.00 0.00 11/03/17 2nd 1,147.63 1,101.72 1,101.72 0.00 45.91 11/03/17 3rd 1,147.62 1,090.24 1,090.24 0.00 57.38 11/03/17 Information Subject to Disclaimer - See Home Page Tax Summary Special Year Total Levied Ad Valorem Principal Interest Date Paid Total Owed Assessments 66.25 2017 3,442.88 3,376.63 0.00 0.00 11/03/17 0.00 [510] 66.25 66.25 2016 3,420.16 3,353.91 0.00 0.00 11/15/16 0.00 [510] 66.25 66.25 2015 3,385.77 3,319.52 0.00 0.00 10/30/15 0.00 [510] 66.25 66.25 2014 3,331.66 3,265.41 0.00 0.00 11/05/14 0.00 [510] 66.25 Property Tax History Summary Tax Year Taxes Levied Total Paid Taxes Paid Interest Paid Date Paid Total Owed 2017 3,442.88 3,339.59 3,339.59 0.00 11/03/17 0.00 2016 3,420.16 3,317.56 3,317.56 0.00 11/15/16 0.00 2015 3,385.77 3,284.20 3,284.20 0.00 10/30/15 0.00 2014 3,331.66 3,231.71 3,231. 71 0.00 11/05/14 0.00 Assessment History Year IImprovementsl Land I I RMV j Exemptions j Assessed 1 /;t /')(11 0 r 1upcuy tJu11u11a1y ( ( Special Mkt/Use 2017 $76 680 $274,000 $0 I $0 $3S0,680 24H2 $268,SOO 2016 $69,820 $2S7,000 $0 I $0 $326,820 24H2 $26S,SSO 201S $62,930 $237,000 $0 I $0 $299,930 24H2 $2S7,820 2014 $4S,890 $237,000 $0 I $0 $282,890 24H2 $2S0,320 2013 $39 000 $229,SOO $0 I $0 $268,SOO 24H2 $243,030 2012 $43,2SO $23S,OOO $0 I $0 $278,2SO $23S,960 2011 $483,360 $23S,OOO $0 I $0 $718,360 $S91,440 2010 $S00,270 $24S,OOO $0 I $0 $74S,270 $S74,220 2009 $490,130 $24S,OOO $0 I $0 $73S,130 $SS7,SOO 2008 $SS7,720 $24S,OOO $0 I $0 $802,720 $S41,270 2007 $S20,480 $240,000 $0 I $0 $760,480 $S2S,S10 2006 $449,SlO $200,000 $0 I $0 $649,SlO $S10,210 200S $410,070 $174,000 $0 I $0 $S84,070 $49S 3SO 2004 $34S,380 $182,370 $0 I $0 $S27,7SO $434,660 2003 $33S,320 $177,060 $0 I $0 $S12,380 $422,000 2002 $342,170 $180,670 $0 I $0 $S22,840 $409,710 2001 $33S,460 $177,130 $0 I $0 $S12,S90 $397,780 2000 $32S,690 $171,970 $0 I $0 $497,660 $386,200 1999 $319,300 $168,600 $0 I $0 $487,900 24 $63,100 1998 $301,200 $1S9,100 $0 I $0 $460,300 24 $61,270 1997 $289,600 $1S3,000 $0 I $0 $442,600 24 $S9,490 1996 $270,600 $143,000 $0 I $0 $413,600 24 $66,100 199S $241,600 $127,700 $0 I $0 $369,300 24 $66,100 2018 Land Information (Unedited and Uncertified) ID I Type I Acres I Sq Ft Lll RES - RESIDENTIAL LAND I i.ool 43S60 2018 Improvement Information (Unedited and Uncertified) Year Built ID Type Class Area Actual/Effective 1 (SFR) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL D 1.1 (MA) MAIN SP 2280 192s I 192S 1.2 (FA) FIN ATTIC SP 1872 1.3 (UB) UNF BSMT SP soo 1.4 (EPR) ENC PORCH SP 864 1.S (SHD) SHED SP 336 1.6 (CON) CONCRETE SP llSO 1.7 (AGX) ATT GAR SP 6SO 1.8 (DEC) DECK SP S44 1 / 11 /'1(\lQ ( Multnomah County Official Records R Weldon , Deputy Clerk 2016-155958 AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: 12/14/2016 09:43:55AM HSF,LLC 1 R-B&S DEED Pgs=2 Stn=72 AT JJN $10.00 $11 .00 $6.00 $20.00 $47.00 . PO Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: HSF,LLC PO Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE BARGAIN AND SALE DEED HEINER FRUEHAUF and SHERON FRUEHAUF whose address is PO Box 70, Corbett, OR 97019 ("Grantors") convey to HSF, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company whose address is PO Box 70, Corbett, OR 97019 ("Grantee") the following described real property: LOTS l and 2, Block 1, REPLAT OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, THOR'S HEIGHTS, in the County of Multnomah and State of Oregon EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion Lying within the limits of the Columbia River Highway The true and actual consideration for this conveyance is $0; this conveyance is a capital contribution to a limited liability company. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301AND195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A .LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPRO ED USES Bargain and Sale Deed - Page I of 2 ~tio; ~ - Q·.:r .,96 ~f); ' OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301AND195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. DATED this \)-+"'day of December, 2016. ~~~ ~~--(< Heiner Fruehauf, Granlor · - STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF Multnomah ) The foregoing instnunent was acknowledged before me on this \"~-\-~day of December, 2016, by Heiner Fruehauf. OFFICIAL STAMP TREVOR ROBINS . I) NOTARY PUSUO·OREGON COMMISSION NO. 952170 Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 27, 2020 My commission expires: l'v1.-'f 1...+ ,Z.oZ..tJ • ) STATE OF OREGON ) SS. ) COUNTY OF Multnomah The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this \)~day of December, 2016, by Sheron Fruehauf. OFFICIAL STAMP - ~ TREVOR ROBINS ~ j NOTARY PUBLIC.OREGON Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon "' . . COMMISSION NO. 952170 My connnission expires: Ju 1-'f 1-1-, "LJ;:>L.O MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY27, 2020 - Bargain and Sale Deed - Page 2 of 2 ( ( Multnomah County Official Records RECORDING REQUESTED BY: R Weldon , Deputy Clerk 2016-120979 09/27/201611 :29:55 AM flfl TICOR lJ!~s·· I R-W DEED Pgs=3 Stn=28 ATMWB $15.00 511.00 510.00 S<0.00 $56.00 9200 SE Sunnybrook Blvd., Ste 130 Clackamas, OR 97015 GRANTOR'S NAME: Geoffrey Joseph Thompson GRANTEE'S NAME: Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO : Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf PO Box70 Corbett, OR 97019 SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf PO Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 R287200, 1NSE30CC-01600, and CODE 074 40301 E Larch Mountain Road, Corbett, OR 97019 \ SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE \,.,, STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED ~ * WHO ALSO APPEARS OF RECORD AS GEOFFREY THOMPSON o Geoffrey Joseph Thompson, "'3rantor, conveys and warrants to Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf, as 5 tenants by the entirety, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as ~ specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon: ~ SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ~THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-SEVEN ~THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($577,150.00). (See ORS 93.030). !;; Subject to: 0 ~ SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF .b~ BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE I ~~~~~~~~~~1~~:~~~~;~ET6E~~~~!~;~~~4.1 Fo~~~o~~~s0 ~~o;,9 ;~~~16~~3~\~N~ ~~~· 31°i. ~ CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS a: INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. Stateof~ CountyoC JoJi'W> · strument was acknowledged before me Ol\,.50 Ut J.. T d-O{'e by Geoffrey Joseph Thompson. cL ~ u c - State of Oregon J I OFFICIAL STAMP PO~OTHY I SCHMALTZ My Commission Expires: l NOTARY l'll!O\L!C·ORF.GON '1-- L9 . COMMISSli'JN NO 940122 MY GOMMISSION EXPlr-.cS JULY 01, 2oi 9 Deed (Statutory Warranty), Legal Printed: 09 .26.16 @ 12:30PMby CF ORD1 368.doc/ Updated: 05.23.16 Page 1 OR-TT-FNIP-02743.473644-36261602877 ( ( EXHIBIT"A" Legal Description Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, REPLAT OF PARTS OF BLOCKS 1 AND 2, THOR'S HEIGHTS, in the County of Multnomah and State of Oregon. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion lying within the limits of the Columbia River Highway. Printed: 09.26.1 6 @ 12:30 PM by CF Deed (Statulory Warranty), Legal OR-lT-FNIP-02743.473644-36261602877 ORD1 368.doc I Updated: 05.23.16 Page 2 ( .. ( EXHIBIT "B" Exceptions Subject to: SPECIFIC ITEMS ANO EXCEPTIONS: Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2016-2017. Tax Identification No.: R287200 Taxes, including current year, have been assessed with an exemption. If the exempt status is terminated under the statute prior to the date on which the assessment roll becomes the tax roll in the year in which said taxes were assessed, an additional tax may be levied. Exemption: (24H2) Historic Property 2 Term Tax Account No.: R287200 Rights of the public to any portion of the Land lying within the area commonly known as streets, roads and highways. Conditions and Restrictions as established by Multnomah County: Purpose: Land Use Hearing Ordinance NoFile No.: T3-06-006 Recording Date: November 28, 2006 Recording No.: 2006-21g397 Re-recording Date: December 22, 2006 Recording No.: 2006-236535 Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion , sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: December 14, 2006 Recording No: 2006-231280 Historic Property Special Assessment Notice Recording Date: May 14, 2013 Recording No. : 2013-0657 4 7 Deed (Statutory Warranty), Legal Printed: 09.26.16@ 12:30 PM by CF OR01 368.doc I Updated: 05.23.16 Page 3 OR-TT-F NIP-0274 3.473644-36261602877 ( -rl-rLET~ .. Company o., O r egon 36261800025 Remit Payment To: Ticor Title Company of Oregon 10151 SE Sunnyside Rd. Suite 300 INVOICE Clackamas, OR 97015 Phone: (503)646-4444 Fax: (503)469-4198 Due upon receipt HSF, LLC P.O. Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 Order Number: 36261800025 Invoice Date: January 4, 2018 Customer Reference No.: 40301 E Larch Mountain Road Invoice Number: 36261800025-1 Operation: 02743.473626 Buyer/Borrower(s): Hsf LLC Title Officer: Kevin Kimball Property Description: 40301 E Larch Mountain Road, Corbett, OR 97019 Bill Code Description Amount OTF Other Title Fees-OEM REPORT 350.00 Invoice total amount due: ======:::::::::::::::::::::::::::$ 350.00 Thank you for the opportunity to serve you. Please return a copy of this invoice with your payment 36261800025 Invoice 1 generated on 1/4/2018 6:11 pm PST by R Page 1 of 1 -.. ~ Multnomah County Official Records 2016-120971 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: R Weldon, Deputy Clerk 09/27 /2016 11 :17:23 AM {fJ TICOR 1'11h§'" 1R-W DEED Pgs=3 Stn=70 ATKRH $15.00 $11 .00 $10.00 $20.00 $56.00 9200 SE Sunnybrook Blvd ., Ste 130 Clackamas, OR 97015 GRANTOR'S NAME: Stephen Serafini GRANTEE'S NAME: Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf ;:.. AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron· Fruehauf ., ?f.J/+J.~f3F/(/>rfr/J'/HJf-ff{'7k/ffcff PO BOX 7 0 Corbett, OR 97019' J'lq,9 ·,, ' SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: ,0 6-1"1>; ~~ Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf ~o /" V / 'Jr/4/2/Jlsfirf,t/>rlJ/J~/:lrlf/t R287215 and 1N5E30CC01500 Vacant Parcel, Corbett, OR 97019 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Stephen Serafini, Grantor, conveys and warrants to Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf, as tenants by the entirety, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon:· r{', ,=..;, SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF :s- THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS FIFTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND ~ c.> N0/100 DOLLARS ($55,000.00). (See ORS 93.030). ..::::, Subject to: ~ SEE EXHIBIT 118 11 ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ~ BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE '""""'w SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 i= TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, 6; CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS 8 INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN ~ VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING ];;' THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH "fil THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND ~ BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR ~ 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON a: LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. ndersigned have executed this document on the date(s) set forth below. EXHIBIT State of~ A.25 County f · , · This instrument was acknowledged before me- on--.':_' J-£JC d-'j :)...[:( Lf by Stephen Serafini. c~ -(I ,S ~ .,_____ ub_g Dee GRANTOR'S NAME: Geoffrey Joseph Thompson GRANTEE'S NAME: Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf \~ AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf PO Box 70 Corbett, OR 97019 ". ,,ce .9 " ~ ~', "· ~ t?'A, • ~... :... , ///>; :.....>' SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: ~~) /' ..,~ Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf \.'-i~V/ PO Box 70 \'.\ Corbett, OR 97019 ~ , R287200, 1 N5E30CC-01600, and CODE 074 40301 E Larch Mountain Road, Corbett, OR 97019 \ SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE \ )C STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED ~ * WHO ALSO APPEARS O.F RECORD AS GEOFFREY THOMPSON o Geoffrey Joseph Thompson, 1Grantor, conveys and warrants to Heiner Fruehauf and Sheron Fruehauf, as _'.) tenants by the entirety, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as ~ specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon: s SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ~ THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-SEVEN ~THOUSANDONE HUNDRED FIFTY AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($577,150.00). (See ORS 93.030). ~ Subject to: 0 ~ SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF i:i... BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE ~ SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 a TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, ~ CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS a: INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. IN WITNESS WHEREOFte undersigned have executed this document on the date(s) set forth below. Dated: q /a1- l(p · c:;v-.-.ia Geoffrey Joseph Thomps n EXHIBIT Stateof~ County o~UY'ICUJ A.26 ~strument was acknowledged befo~-me or\~Ot1 t J..T d-O{!e by Geoffrey Joseph Thompson. &--- ~ u1'!(c - State of Oregon J I OFPICiAL STAMP POROTHYI SCHMALTZ My Commission Expires: 1--( L9 NOTARYNJBL.!C·ORf.GON ·- COMMISSIONNO 940122 MYtlOMMISSION tXPIP.~S JULYOi, 2019 Deed (Statutory Warranty), Legal Printed: 09.26.16 @ 12:30 PM by CF ORD1368.doc I Updated: 05.23 16 Page 1 OR-TI-FNIP-02743,473644-36261602877 5~: ((@JB~"~ A.ftt- lhcln1onn~1·01~hc·....:1hl'ft O'I I .I 1\ MUST 6! F1El.O V~~iflEO. ~ ruc;•JfA-. 11•~Cll·1 r.r G1cshnm dt~!i.n-'1 ~fik-< Arprowil !'Inn, 1..,11 ~11u f?;tr !J~~1..i1toe;:i~bu!!! tlJ! t . el-t/o. Jnbalteror•Uhnpc~1111t. <12YM &' ,/ri(ot. '1'-i·oFO~ /CITYOF GRESHAM) Art:a Cal01lation... ; "'''"' ~/1\i.ninjf. :AP~~ROVEDPLANS -~ 1 '4i~ Kltdu;11: ""'O:' Lobby: i ~~s~;~~~~~~~~~~~Ut~l\~~~~:J~~~~~I -""",....._""" 6 """"""'''IQt•lmll!rrertrme•flPO••tt•• 1: L~~~gt~~~ci:Uinu~li~,~~~~~~?;.~ll~11°~ .~~~ ·~:.: / ~~~~~:i~Eo;cci~~~~{i~~~·;~~~so.~'~i~:!:Y;,~ ~'tto~f.1 o.as i TOEX:Sil11TH!S!Jf.'!f(:lCOt.Si'l.~ilON.~d. I ~lili l!'-'1...'!.."''""" .~·-= dU f=id«! ; ~: l2il)l._. ""'-"""""'"" ,...,_ i :1--r-\O "' J .\J · r ~! ' . f .....-- /~ 1~· I - ,IE).. I . if! "' "-' !~ ~ I ·\ ;: \ 'EE.s : I ~ g . o so: {ll)- t \ t ~~]) )·- a.!i. - . (Q;I '5 .... J 1 ~1 ,... !il·uo :1 0 ,~ . : § : G ~ j', 1...... ,,,,,. ..l ·.•· \>'"' ...., $_ _ (E) a~ I I .E[} ;f (N)P-· '.Qi~! D«k 1~._.. ,;..,• ~~ __ • .. 2anployet rn, I ~p /. - t J 5r.:7 l-'\__~) ~ - 1 - ·~ . .1 .. '. I l~MI J I mr1 t~ :;-.. 1· i - ~r r.:u-king g - -- Cnlshcd\rock ·-"': v-..;,i':::b ~~ -~.# ..u-11" * I I I I I T ti. '{iU-1 ·_,_.;pit 'i . s .. "' · -· -- PREVIOUSLY A PPROVED PARKING LAYOUT & ~~ - INCLUDED FOR REFERENCE. SEE DRAWING SHEET AO .l FOR CURRENT PROPOSED LAYOUT. g N h tr Alder- g -.'- -~ $ .llhJl~,., - · ~~20'-o" ~ OU 5 :: _t- . I_ () ~ 20 .o s CodeSu;pWey; ·.D* ~t!G.~· Applic:lhlecods2CO(IHC 111A ~ =::~~~Res~UDnt>clnn "'- I 1. ~..thi~perL.~~-'-' ---v--•f>• ~-~qgnNp:A2 • ~ ifW~• BullcU11gAra 1 -4,.0Q).ol - ~ -~~~uogiNtb11ilding SN.ting: 125-b I-----< tabbies" ~ Ottup.vil:Jo.dinc: OU-.g: 2,a.ll/15-llS«atpW'i .• . P • Tot:il: ~/~~ 5- 1 ~ / ~I -.. ·-· :.__--. ~-::::__:-::-::-_.__:_:-_: :. :...... ;'= -. - ...-::: .· :_.-:::~-:_--::-=.:-:;::. : :,·. :::--:::--::-:~~;.._ ,_ - -· -· ~-~:-~~:;:,} __:·,r~ % m- =i EMERICK ARCHITECTS July 10, 2018 Rithy Khut Multnomah County Land Use Planning Division 1600SE190th Avenue Portland, OR 97233 RE: View Point Inn Land Use Application (Case #T3-2018-9967) Dear Rithy Khut: On February 23, 2018, you provided a Completeness Review letter regarding the above referenced Land Use application for the View Point Inn project located at 40301 E. Larch Mountain Road. That letter identified the additional information needed for the application to be deemed complete. The_package that is included with this letter provides the requested information as follows: 1. Administration and Procedures: • An additional payment of $1,305 was requested to cover all applicable application fees. Payment is being made along with the submittal of this information. 2. National Scenic Area Site Review Approval Criteria: • The Forest Service determined that a Historic Survey is required and an OR SHPO Clearance Form was to be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office. • We coordinated with Chris Donnermeyer of the USFS to confirm the appropriate information was being provided. Correspondence with Chris confirmed that a Reconnaissance Survey was not required. A copy of that email correspondence has been included within this submittal package. • A copy of the Oregon SHPO Clearance Form that was submitted is enclosed in this package, along with a confirmation letter from SHPO to fulfill the Historic Survey requirements for completeness. • A copy of the Heritage Review letter from Chris Donnermeyer of the USFS is enclosed in this package, along with email confirmation from Chris that the CRGNSA Heritage Review is complete. 3 . Variance: • Consent of Variance Request from all property owners within 100 feet of the subject property was required and a list of those property owners was provided. • See the enclosed Property Owner Consent of Va. ri~nce ~~Mftfo r,ms signed by adjacent property owners - Rowton, Snide. ODOT (Dan ~"<1_9jfi>~ '1-io/ C1~~fimr rvice. 02 :2 Md 11 1nr 81-0Z 03/\ 1 3 8 3 ~ EXHIBIT 321 SOUTHWEST FOURTH AVENUE # 2 00 PORTLAND OREGON 97204 503 2 3 5 9400 Pmen ck-arch1tects com A. 2.1