DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 2020/0374(COD) 9.7.2021 AMENDMENTS 128 - 302 Draft report Andreas Schwab (PE692.792v01-00) Contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) Proposal for a regulation (COM(2020)0842 – C9-0419/2020 – 2020/0374(COD)) AM\1235546EN.docx PE695.143v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegReport PE695.143v01-00 2/156 AM\1235546EN.docx EN Amendment 128 Evelyne Gebhardt, Alex Agius Saliba, Adriana Maldonado López, Petra Kammerevert, Maria Grapini, Marc Angel, Brando Benifei, Andreas Schieder, Christel Schaldemose, Isabel Santos, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Sylvie Guillaume Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) Digital services in general and (1) Digital services in general and online platforms in particular play an online platforms in particular play an increasingly important role in the increasingly important role in the economy, in particular in the internal economy, in particular in the internal market, by providing new business market, by providing new business opportunities in the Union and facilitating opportunities in the Union and facilitating cross-border trading. cross-border trading. They serve as essential facilities for the digital economy by providing access to critical infrastructures. Or. en Amendment 129 Marcel Kolaja, Rasmus Andresen, Kim Van Sparrentak on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) Digital services in general and (1) Digital services in general and online platforms in particular play an online platforms in particular play an increasingly important role in the increasingly important role in the economy, in particular in the internal economy, in particular in the internal market, by providing new business market, by providing new business opportunities in the Union and facilitating opportunities in the Union and facilitating cross-border trading. cross-border trading but also to the benefit of consumers with a greater choice in products and services provided. Or. en Amendment 130 AM\1235546EN.docx 3/156 PE695.143v01-00 EN Marcel Kolaja, Kim Van Sparrentak, Rasmus Andresen on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Core platform services, at the same (2) Core platform services, at the same time, feature a number of characteristics time, feature a number of characteristics that can be exploited by their providers. that can be exploited by their providers. These characteristics of core platform These characteristics of core platform services include among others extreme services include among others extreme scale economies, which often result from scale economies, which often result from nearly zero marginal costs to add business nearly zero marginal costs to add business users or end users. Other characteristics of users or end users. Other characteristics of core platform services are very strong core platform services are very strong network effects, an ability to connect many network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users business users with many end users through the multi-sidedness of these through the multi-sidedness of these services, a significant degree of services, a significant degree of dependence of both business users and end dependence of both business users and end users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- homing for the same purpose by end users, homing for the same purpose by end users, vertical integration, and data driven- vertical integration, and data driven- advantages. All these characteristics advantages. All these characteristics combined with unfair conduct by providers combined with unfair conduct by providers of these services can have the effect of of these services can have the effect of substantially undermining the substantially undermining the contestability of the core platform services, contestability of the core platform services, as well as impacting the fairness of the as well as impacting the fairness of the commercial relationship between providers commercial relationship between providers of such services and their business users of such services and their business users and end users, leading to rapid and and end users, and lowering of consumer potentially far-reaching decreases in protection standards; leading to rapid and business users’ and end users’ choice in potentially far-reaching decreases in practice, and therefore can confer to the business users’ and end users’ choice in provider of those services the position of a practice, and therefore can confer to the so-called gatekeeper. provider of those services the position of a so-called gatekeeper. End users are similarly affected by unfair practices by gatekeepers and their interests should be taken into account in the obligations to be imposed under this Regulation. Or. en Amendment 131 PE695.143v01-00 4/156 AM\1235546EN.docx EN Virginie Joron, Jean-Lin Lacapelle Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Core platform services, at the same (2) Core platform services, at the same time, feature a number of characteristics time, feature a number of characteristics that can be exploited by their providers. that are exploited by their providers. These These characteristics of core platform characteristics of core platform services services include among others extreme include among others extreme scale scale economies, which often result from economies, which often result from nearly nearly zero marginal costs to add business zero marginal costs to add business users users or end users. Other characteristics of or end users. Other characteristics of core core platform services are very strong platform services are very strong network network effects, an ability to connect many effects, an ability to connect many business business users with many end users users with many end users through the through the multi-sidedness of these multi-sidedness of these services, a services, a significant degree of significant degree of dependence of both dependence of both business users and end business users and end users, lock-in users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- effects, a lack of multi-homing for the homing for the same purpose by end users, same purpose by end users, vertical vertical integration, and data driven- integration, and data driven-advantages. advantages. All these characteristics All these characteristics combined with combined with unfair conduct by providers unfair conduct by providers of these of these services can have the effect of services can have the effect of substantially substantially undermining the undermining the contestability of the core contestability of the core platform services, platform services, as well as impacting the as well as impacting the fairness of the fairness of the commercial relationship commercial relationship between providers between providers of such services and of such services and their business users their business users and end users, leading and end users, leading to rapid and to rapid and potentially far-reaching potentially far-reaching decreases in decreases in business users’ and end users’ business users’ and end users’ choice in choice in practice, and therefore can confer practice, and therefore can confer to the to the provider of those services the provider of those services the position of a position of a so-called gatekeeper. so-called gatekeeper. Or. fr Amendment 132 Virginie Joron, Alessandra Basso, Isabella Tovaglieri, Markus Buchheit, Jean-Lin Lacapelle Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 AM\1235546EN.docx 5/156 PE695.143v01-00 EN Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) A small number of large providers (3) A small number of large – non- of core platform services have emerged European and notably American – with considerable economic power. providers of core platform services have Typically, they feature an ability to connect emerged with considerable economic many business users with many end users power. Typically, they feature an ability to through their services which, in turn, connect many business users with many allows them to leverage their advantages, end users through their services which, in such as their access to large amounts of turn, allows them to leverage their data, from one area of their activity to new advantages and abuse their position, such ones. Some of these providers exercise as their access to large amounts of data, control over whole platform ecosystems in from one area of their activity to new ones. the digital economy and are structurally Some of these providers exercise control extremely difficult to challenge or contest over whole platform ecosystems in the by existing or new market operators, digital economy and are structurally irrespective of how innovative and efficient extremely difficult to challenge or contest these may be. Contestability is particularly by existing or new market operators, reduced due to the existence of very high irrespective of how innovative and efficient barriers to entry or exit, including high these may be. Contestability is particularly investment costs, which cannot, or not reduced due to the existence of very high easily, be recuperated in case of exit, and barriers to entry or exit, including high absence of (or reduced access to) some key investment costs, which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • Time for the European Commission to Legislate on Collective Redress
    Mr Jean-Claude Juncker President of the Commission Mrs Vera Jourová Commissioner The Consumer Voice in Europe European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B – 1049 Brussels Ref.: BEUC-X-2017-107 10 October 2017 Subject: Time for the European Commission to legislate on collective redress Dear President Juncker, Dear Commissioner Jourová, I write on behalf of BEUC, The European Consumer Organisation, to ask you to propose a binding legislative measure on collective redress. Consumer rights at EU level have come a long way over the last 20 years. However, the inability of consumers to band together to claim their rights when they have suffered detriment is one of the missing pieces of the jigsaw for EU consumers to access justice. As you are aware, Volkswagen has steadfastly refused to compensate consumers in Europe affected by the emissions scandal. This is in stark contrast to their response in the United States, where the threat of class action has proved decisive in delivering compensation for affected consumers. In your State of the Union speech a few days ago, you said that you are “shocked when consumers are knowingly and deliberately misled” and that you “call on the car industry to come clean and make it right”. We know that despite Commissioner Jourova’s efforts, which we appreciate, the company still refuses to put things right. Since the scandal broke over two years ago, VW remains adamant it will not compensate European car owners. It is now in your hands to decide whether in the future European consumers who have been victims of fraud on a large scale, or who have suffered from a trader’s unfair or illegal practices, should have a realistic chance to be compensated.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Newsletter
    EPILEPSY ALLIANCE EUROPE NEWS FROM THE TASK FORCE CHAIRS under the auspices of: ® EA E International Bureau for APRIL 2018 Epilepsy Alliance Europe IBE Epilepsy Meet the members of the Task Force 2017-2021 Martin Brodie, Co-chair representing IBE Philippe Ryvlin, Co-chair representing ILAE Janet Mifsud, representing IBE Caroline Morton, representing IBE Francesca Sofia, representing IBE Lievan Lagae, representing ILAE Eugen Trinka, representing ILAE Kristl Vonck, representing ILAE FIND OUT MORE www.epilepsyallianceeurope.org/epilepsy-alliance-europe-task-force/ INTERNATIONAL EPILEPSY DAY IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Philippe Ryvlin and Martin Brodie, Co-chair, Epilepsy Alliance Europe Task Force A global alliance for epilepsy The European Advocates for Epilepsy MEP group in the European In opening the briefing, Brian Hayes MEP explained that the work- Parliament, organised a Breakfast Briefing in the parliament in Brus- shop focused on the need for a global alliance for epilepsy research sels on 31st January to mark International Epilepsy and was a follow up to an important workshop held Day. Hosted by its President, Brian Hayes MEP (Ire- in 2017 and which involved representatives from land), the event was attended by several MEPs, Epilepsy is a the national health agencies in the US and Canada. including Mrs Lieve Wierlinck (Belgium), Seán Kelly most complex Speaking at the event, Francesca Sofia, the mother (Ireland), Alojz Peterle (Slovenia), Roberta Metsola of an eight-year old girl with difficult refractory epi- (Malta), José Inácio Faria (Portugal), and Franc disease. lepsy, said: “My plea to you today is to work with us Bogovič (Slovenia). in a life-changing movement to save a community Also present were Stéphane Hogan, Head of Sec- Fighting of 6 million people (with epilepsy).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels. 1 Į JIL 201/ Ares (2017) Ľ7!4855
    Ref. Ares(2017)3497732 - 11/07/2017 European Commission J©ага-CLaon(đ© JUNCKER Rue de la Loi, 200 President of the European Commission B-1049 Brussels Tel. +32 2 295 50 33 [email protected] Brussels. 1 į JIL 201/ Ares (2017) ľ7!4855 Dear Honourable Member, I would like to thank you and the co-signatories for your letter of 30 March 2017 expressing your concerns regarding the Nord Stream 2 project. The European Commission is fully committed to pursuing the objectives of the Energy1 Union strategy. In this context, the Commission is promoting diversification and competitive gas markets in the EU. In order to complete the internal energy’ market, the Commission supports infrastructure projects of common interest, which improve the interconnectivity between the Member States. Furthermore, the Commission, together with the Member States, is working to improve the resilience of the EU gas system to security of supply threats. To this end. the Commission has proposed a revised Regulation on security of gas supplies on which the European Parliament and the Council have recently reached an agreement. As regards Nord Stream 2, the Commission considers that the project is not in line with the policy objectives of the Energy' Union as it will not give access to a new supply source. Nord Stream 2, if built, cannot and should not be operated in a legal void or solely according to the law of a third country. Mr Jeppe KOFOD and 64 MEP co- signatories Member of the European Parliament E-mail · jeppe. kofod7aie uro pari, europa, eu As a result a special legal regime respecting fundamental principles of international and EU energy law needs to be established.
    [Show full text]
  • Greens/EFA Group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees
    Seats in Committees Update 04.02.2021 Greens/EFA group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees Parliamentary Committees Seats FULL Members SUBSTITUTE Members Foreign Affairs (AFET) Marketa GREGOROVÁ Alviina ALAMETSÄ Pierrette HERZBERGER- Reinhard BÜTIKOFER FOFANA Viola VON CRAMON Sergey LAGODINSKY 7 Jordi SOLE Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Tineke STRIK Hannah NEUMANN Thomas WAITZ Mounir SATOURI Salima YENBOU Ernest URTASUN Agriculture (AGRI) Claude GRUFFAT Benoit BITEAU 5 Anna DEPARNAY- Francisco GUERREIRO GRUNENBERG Martin HÄUSLING Pär HOLMGREN Bronis ROPĖ Tilly METZ Sarah WIENER Thomas WAITZ Budgets (BUDG) Rasmus ANDRESEN Damien BOESELAGER 4 David CORMAND Henrike HAHN Alexandra GEESE Monika VANA Francisco GUERREIRO Vacant Culture & Education (CULT) Romeo FRANZ Marcel KOLAJA 3 Niklas NIENASS Diana RIBA Salima YENBOU Vacant Development (DEVE) Pierrette HERZBERGER- Alviina ALAMETSÄ FOFANA Benoit BITEAU 3 Erik MARQUARDT Caroline ROOSE Michelle RIVASI Economic & Monetary Affairs Sven GIEGOLD Damien CARÊME (ECON) Claude GRUFFAT Karima DELLI Stasys JAKELIŪNAS Bas EICKHOUT 7 Philippe LAMBERTS Henrike HAHN Kira PETER-HANSEN Ville NIINISTÖ Ernest URTASUN Mikulas PEKSA Piernicola PEDICINI Vacant Committee seats - UPDATE 30.9.20 Employment & Social Affairs Kira PETER-HANSEN Romeo FRANZ 4 (EMPL) Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Terry REINTKE Mounir SATOURI Kim VAN SPARRENTAK Tatjana ŽDANOKA Sara MATTHIEU Environment, Public Health & Margarete AUKEN Michael BLOSS Food safety (ENVI) Bas EICKHOUT Manuela RIPA Pär HOLMGREN Sven GIEGOLD Yannick JADOT Martin HÄUSLING
    [Show full text]
  • IMCO-PV-2021-03-17-1 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection IMCO_PV(2021)0317_1 MINUTES Meeting of 17 March 2021, 13.45-16.15 and 16.45-18.45, and 18 March 2021, 9.30-12.30 BRUSSELS The meeting was held with the remote participation of most attendants and opened at 13.48 on Wednesday, 17 March 2021, with Anna Cavazzini (Chairwoman) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda IMCO_OJ(2021)0317_1 Decision: The draft agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair’s announcements A. Interpretation Interpretation is available for the following languages FR DE IT NL EN DA ES PT SV CS ET PL SK BG RO HR. Speakers were invited to speak their mother tongue if it is one of languages for which interpretation is available. B. Time Management The chair reminded MEPs that Coordinators have agreed an adapted framework for the exchange of views on Reports/Opinions which restricts the floor to one MEP per Political Group (usually the shadow or his/her replacement) for a limited duration. This reflects the limitation imposed to all committee meetings and the necessity to give priority to items of business in relation to COVID-19 issues. PV\1227931EN.docx PE691.179v01-00 EN United in diversityEN C. Webstreaming and eMeeting The Chairwoman reminded Members that the meeting is webstreamed live and that the eMeeting application is available on tablet or laptop to access the meeting documents, as IMCO is totally paperless. D. Newsletter Members were also informed that the new issue of IMCO's Newsletter (Nr.117) is available.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 14 April 2020 Dear Ms Elżbieta Witek, Marshal of the Sejm
    Brussels, 14 April 2020 Dear Ms Elżbieta Witek, Marshal of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, Dear Members of the Polish Parliament, Dear Colleagues, As Members of the European Parliament, we are writing to express our deep concern regarding the Parliamentary Document no 39 on amending the act of June 6, 1997 - the Penal Code - known as the “Stop paedophilia” bill - and Parliamentary Document No 36 on the amendment to the Act of 7 January 1993 on family planning, protection of the human fetus and conditions for the termination of pregnancy -known as “Stop Abortion” bill - that will be debated in a first reading in the Sejm of the Republic of Poland in your sitting of the 15-16 April 2020. We are convinced that measures that roll back protections for women’s human rights and self- determination are of grave concern as they undermine a core European Union value, that of advancing gender equality. Under human rights law measures that undermine or restrict exist- ing rights are not permitted and these draft bills violate Poland’s obligation to ensure ever greater protection of human rights. We are deeply concerned that the “Stop Abortion” bill provide for the prohibition of termina- tion of pregnancy due to severe or fatal foetal anomalies, currently a legal ground for abortion in Poland. Poland’s Act of 1993 on Family Planning, Protection of Human Fetus and the Con- ditions of Legal Pregnancy Termination is one of the most restrictive laws on abortion in the European Union. The bill would in effect result in a near total denial of access to legal abortion in Poland as most legal abortions are performed under this ground.
    [Show full text]