DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Plan Purpose.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Former Bennett Freeze Area (FBFA) History ...................................................................... 2 1.3 Location Map ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Scope of Work ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Chapter Description .............................................................................................................. 5 1.5.1 History............................................................................................................................ 6 1.5.2 Physical Setting .............................................................................................................. 6 1.5.3 Chapter Boundaries ........................................................................................................ 6 1.6 Public Participation Process and Planning Process .............................................................. 9 1.6.1 Public Participation ........................................................................................................ 9 1.6.2 Planning Process ............................................................................................................ 9 2.0 Existing Conditions – Community Assessment ................................................................. 12 2.1 Demographics and Community Profile .............................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Population .................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Income.......................................................................................................................... 19 2.1.3 Poverty Status .............................................................................................................. 20 2.1.4 Housing ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.1.5 Employment and Unemployment ................................................................................ 26 2.1.6 Education ..................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.7 Health and Public Safety .............................................................................................. 27 2.1.8 Community Facilities, Parks, and Recreation .............................................................. 27 2.2 Local Economy ................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.1 Jobs by Sector .............................................................................................................. 28 2.2.2 Major Employers ......................................................................................................... 29 2.2.3 Class of Workers .......................................................................................................... 29 2.2.4 Commute Time ............................................................................................................ 30 2.2.5 Local Businesses .......................................................................................................... 30 2.2.6 Household purchases ................................................................................................... 30 2.2.7 Tourism ........................................................................................................................ 31 2.3 Land and Water Resources ................................................................................................. 38 2.3.1 Land Status................................................................................................................... 39 2.3.2 Preliminary Environmental Assessments .................................................................... 40 2.3.3 Land Suitability and Resources ................................................................................... 45 2.4 Infrastructure and Utilities .................................................................................................. 45 2.4.1 Electricity ..................................................................................................................... 46 i 2.4.2 Water Systems ............................................................................................................. 47 2.4.3 Wastewater ................................................................................................................... 50 2.4.4 Solid Waste .................................................................................................................. 50 2.4.5 Natural Gas .................................................................................................................. 50 2.4.6 Communications .......................................................................................................... 50 2.5 Transportation, Roads, and Accessibility ........................................................................... 51 2.5.1 Roads............................................................................................................................ 51 2.5.2 Public Transportation ................................................................................................... 54 2.5.3 Air Transportation ........................................................................................................ 54 3.0 The Development Plan ....................................................................................................... 55 3.1 Vision .................................................................................................................................. 55 3.2 Development Issues ............................................................................................................ 57 3.2.1 Need to Define Land Use and Status ........................................................................... 57 3.2.2 Need to Conduct a Community Assessment ................................................................ 57 3.2.3 Diversity of Perspectives ............................................................................................. 57 3.2.4 No Support for Former Bennett Freeze Area and Local Priorities .............................. 57 3.2.5 Limited Resources ....................................................................................................... 58 3.2.6 Legal and Procedural Constraints ................................................................................ 58 3.2.7 No Local Structure for Water and Utilities .................................................................. 58 3.2.8 Absence of Housing Development Plan ...................................................................... 58 3.3 Strategic Directions ............................................................................................................. 58 3.3.1 Public Awareness through Outreach and Education .................................................... 58 3.3.2 Certifying of Comprehensive Land Use Plan .............................................................. 59 3.3.3 Achieving Results through Collaborative Partnerships ............................................... 59 3.3.4 Recognizing Existing Laws, Protocols, and Policies ................................................... 59 3.3.5 Securing Alternative Resources ................................................................................... 59 3.3.6 Strengthening Local Governance ................................................................................. 59 3.4 Development Principles ...................................................................................................... 60 3.4.1 High Quality Construction ........................................................................................... 60 3.4.2 Hoozho Lina, Respectful Balance................................................................................ 60 3.4.3 Preservation and Protection ......................................................................................... 60 3.4.4 Future ........................................................................................................................... 60 3.5 Community Needs Assessment........................................................................................... 61 3.5.1 Infrastructure and Utility Needs................................................................................... 61 3.5.2 Transportation Needs ................................................................................................... 62 3.5.3 Housing Needs ............................................................................................................. 62 3.5.4 Health and Public Safety Needs ................................................................................... 63 ii 3.5.5 Community Facilities, Parks, and Recreation Needs ................................................... 64 3.5.6 Educational Needs ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7 the Enduring Hopi
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law History, Department of September 2008 Chapter 7 The Enduring Hopi Peter Iverson Arizona State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hopination Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons Iverson, Peter, "Chapter 7 The Enduring Hopi" (2008). HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law. 16. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hopination/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CHAPTER 7 The Enduring Hopi Peter Iverson “What then is the meaning of the tricentennial observance? It is a reaffirmation of continuity and hope for the collective Hopi future.” The Hopi world is centered on and around three mesas in northeastern Arizona named First, Sec- ond, and Third. It is at first glance a harsh and rugged land, not always pleasing to the untrained eye. Prosperity here can only be realized with patience, determination, and a belief in tomorrow.1 For over 400 years, the Hopis have confronted the incursion of outside non-Indian societies. The Spanish entered Hopi country as early as 1540. Then part of Francisco Vásquez de Coronado’s explor- ing party invaded the area with characteristic boldness and superciliousness. About twenty Spaniards, including a Franciscan missionary, confronted some of the people who resided in the seven villages that now comprise the Hopi domain, and under the leadership of Pedro de Tovar, the Spanish over- came Hopi resistance, severely damaging the village of Kawaiokuh, and winning unwilling surrender.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020.2021 EEO Report
    EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT YEAR 2020-2021 Employment Unit Covered : KAFF AM, KAFF FM, KMGN, KTMG, KNOT, KFSZ Reporting Period: 06/01/2020 -05/31/2021 Full Time Job Vacanies filled during reporting period and recruitment /referral sources used for each vacancy JOB TITLE VACANCY Recruitment Sources Hire Source Date Open Date Filled Location Senior Account Executive N,Q,V V 06/01/2020 10/30/2020 Flagstaff Recruitment Sources # Interviewees Referred Arizona Broadcaster Assoc. Job Fair 6 Craigslist.com 0 Indeed.com 0 On Air Recruitment Ads 3 Linked In 0 Station Websites 0 Arizona Broadcaster Assoc. 0 Facebook Job Posting 0 Internal Station Postings 0 Walk Ins 0 Market Referral 1 Job Fair 0 Recruitment Source List: Code: Arizona Broadcaster Assoc. Job Fair A Arizona Daily Sun B City of Williams C Coconino County Career Center E Craigslist F DES Job Service G Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce H Flagstaff Jobseeker.com I Indeed.com K Handshake.com NAU L Linked In M On Air Recruitment Ads N Prescott Chamber of Commerce O Sedona Chamber of Commerce P Station Websites Postings Q The Daily Courier R Williams Grand Canyon News S Internal Station Postings T Walk Ins U Market Referral V Facebook Ad Posting W Job Fair X During this reporting period, 3 interns from NAU participated in the News Reporting and Sports Broadcasting internship and 1 intern from NAU participated in the production internship. Ongoing semester internship program has been in place for last 17 years. The internship program provides students with real world working experience in Programming, News Reporting, Sports Broadcasting and the Broadcast Industy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Th 445 12 St., S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 th 445 12 St., S.W. Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Washington, D.C. 20554 TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 18- 155 Released: February 23, 2018 MEDIA BUREAU COMMENCES 2018 EEO AUDITS On February 26, the Media Bureau will send the first of its Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) audit letters for 2018 to randomly selected radio and television stations. In accordance with Section 73.2080(f)(4) of the Commission’s EEO rules, 47 CFR § 73.2080(f)(4), the Bureau annually audits the EEO programs of randomly selected broadcast licensees. Each year, approximately five percent of all radio and television stations are selected for EEO audits. Attached are a list of the radio and television stations included in this audit, as well as the text of the February 26, 2018 audit letter. The list and the letter can also be viewed by accessing the Media Bureau’s current EEO headline page on the FCC website at http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/equal-employment-opportunity-headlines News Media Contact: Janice Wise at 202-418-8165 Media Bureau Contact: Lewis Pulley at 202-418-1450 (AUDIT LETTER) February 26, 2018 In accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(f)(4) of the Commission’s rules, the station employment unit (the “Unit”) that includes your above-referenced station (the “Station”) has been randomly selected for an audit of its Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) program. This is a link to Section 73.2080 of the Commission’s rules for your reference: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2017-title47-vol4/pdf/CFR-2017-title47-vol4-sec73- 2080.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology and Water Resources of the Hopi Reservation, Arizona
    Hydrogeology and Water Resources of the Hopi Reservation, Arizona Hopi Water Resources Program Lionel Puhuyesva – Director James A. Duffield R.G. - Hydrogeologist The Hopi Reservation Where the Hopi have resided for over 1,500 years. A land of high desert. Marc Reisner in Cadillac Desert “A semidesert with a desert heart” Water in the High Desert Where residents depend on groundwater. A land of violent summer thunderstorms Current Reservation Boundaries The Hopi Reservation is located entirely in the State of Arizona. District Six, reserved exclusively for Hopi use, consists of 2,500 square miles. Other holdings include the joint use area with the surrounding Navajo Reservation and new land ranches near Flagstaff. Hopi District Six, the Hopi Mesas The broad plateau of Black Mesa is dissected by several northeast oriented canyons that divide the plateau into fingers or mesas. The Hopi Villages are located on these southwest oriented fingers on First, Second, and Third Mesa. The Villages of Upper and Lower Moenkopi are located to the west of the main portion of the Reservation near Tuba City. The Reservation is Located in the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Region A region of relatively un-deformed rocks defined by the Grand Canyon geology. It is formed by a thick crustal block that has been resistant to deformation. This has retained the original horizontal layering of the rock. Layers of Gently Folded Sedimentary Rocks are Stacked Atop Each Other. On the Hopi Reservation Wide Mesas Are Interspersed with Broad Valleys The southern part of the Reservation is lower and semi-arid. The northern portion of the reservation includes the higher reaches of Black Mesa where the elevation approaches 7,000 feet and much of the winter precipiation falls as snow.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVAJO NATION: Tuba City, Arizona PROGRAM HANDBOOK
    www.amizade.org 412-586-4986 [email protected] PO Box 6894, 343 Stansbury Hall, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA NAVAJO NATION: Tuba City, Arizona PROGRAM HANDBOOK Introduction This Handbook was written to provide you with useful information regarding your participation in an Amizade sponsored program. It answers many of the frequently asked questions by previous participants. We encourage your feedback on how it can be improved for future participants. Please read this entire handbook carefully and contact our office if you have any questions. Amizade’s Mission & Vision Amizade encourages intercultural exploration and understanding through community-driven service-learning courses and volunteer programs. Amizade imagines a world in which all people have the opportunity to explore and grow, realize their ability to make change, and embrace their responsibility to build a better world. Amizade’s Commitment At the heart of Amizade is the sincere belief that intercultural understanding & the development of global citizens is essential to our increasingly connected global world. We are committed to providing you with an intercultural experience that allows you to make concrete contributions to a community resulting in a deeper understanding of your role in the global community. Approach to Service Ethic of Service Amizade strives to promote an “ethic of service” on all our programs. This means that we envision the entire experience as one of service to our fellow human beings. There will be scheduled time for completing service projects on each program but we also encourage you to carry your ethic of service with you throughout the program. You can do this by volunteering to help with food preparation, cleaning, or various other daily tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Community Involvement Plan for Tuba City Dump Cleanup Site
    TUBA CITY DUMP COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2013 INTRODUCTION Under the Federal Superfund program, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is overseeing a comprehensive environmental investigation and evaluation of cleanup options for the Tuba City Dump. This Community Involvement Plan (CIP) outlines specific outreach activities to address community concerns and meet the following goals: • Encourage community interest and give the public the opportunity to provide meaningful input into site cleanup decisions; • Provide to the Navajo and Hopi communities accurate, timely and understand- able information about what we learn in our investigations, in a manner considerate to their preference and culture; • Respect and consider community and tribal leaders’ input and feedback on USEPA’s process as it is being carried out. To put this plan together, USEPA began by conducting a series of community interviews in March 2012 with residents, elected officials and other stakeholders in the area. Many interviews were conducted with individual residents and tribal leaders in the Upper Village of Moenkopi, and in the Moencopi Village – Lower (also known as Lower Moencopi), within the Hopi Tribe. Earlier interviews, in 2011, were conducted with residents of Lower Moencopi. USEPA did not conduct interviews with residents on the Navajo Reservation because many of the Navajo residents had been interviewed recently by Navajo Nation EPA and USEPA for site history information. Out of respect for these residents, the Navajo Nation EPA asked USEPA to coordinate the development of the CIP through their Community Involvement Coordinator because they are already familiar with the Navajo residents’ preferences for receiving information and staying involved with site decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 0
    Fall 08 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1 1 Second Mesa Culture Center Website 2016 0 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Hopi Tribe Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2018 U.S. Economic Development Administration Prepared by: Hopi Tribe Office of Community Planning and Economic Development and Land Information Systems OCPEDLIS 2 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 3 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Hopi Tribal Council Executive Branch Timothy L. Nuvangyaoma, Hopi Tribal Chairman Clark W. Tenakhongva, Hopi Tribe Vice Chairman Wilfred L. Gaseoma, Tribal Treasurer Theresa Lomakema, Tribal Secretary Alfonso Sakeva Jr., Sergeant at Arms Village of Bakabi Village of Kykotsmovi Clifford Qotsaquahu David Talyumptewa Lamar Keevama Jack Harding Jr. Davis Pecusa Phillip Quochytewa Sr. Herman G. Honanie Upper Village of Moencopi Village of Mishongnovi Robert Charley Pansy K. Edmo Leroy Shingoitewa Craig Andrews Bruce Fredericks Annette F. Talayumptewa Philton Talahytewa, Sr. First Mesa Consolidated Villages Albert T. Sinquah Village of Sipalouvi Wallace Youvella, Sr. Norene Kootswatewa Alverna Poneoma Rosa Honani THE FOLLOWING VILLAGES CHOOSE TRADITIONAL GOVERNMENT AND DO NOT HAVE VILLAGE REPRESENTATION ON THE TRIBAL COUNCIL. Village of Shungopavi Village of Oraibi Village of Hotevilla Village of Lower Moencopi 0 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo-Hopi Resettlement Program
    ll_ll,^lllll**-,,,,“”” __ “_,l...*__ .._-. ..- .. “_.._-..I - .._. ---__-_.- ._.._._-__ llnilc4 Shtcs General Acctoun ting Oflice hiding Report to the Honorable Wayne Owens, IIouse of Representatives INDIAN PROGRAMS Navajo-Hopi Resettlement Program / llllllllllIll11 143541 United States General Accounting OflIce Denver Regional OfPke Suite 300-D 2420W.26thAvenue Denver, CO 80211 B-242948 March 6,lWl The Honorable Wayne Owens House of Representatives Dear Mr. Owens: You requested that we review issues concerning the Hopi and Navajo people since the passage of the 1974 Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Act; This act called for the final settlement of a land dispute that originated more than a century ago between the Navajo and Hopi tribes in Arizona. Under the act, tribal members residing on lands given to the other tribe were required to relocate. The act also created an independent Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, headed by three commissioners appointed by the Secretary of the Interior, to plan and implement a relocation pr0gram.l We briefed you on the current status of the relocation program, the problems faced by relocatees, and the future of those Navajos who are resisting relocation. This briefing report formally transmits the information we obtained and also provides information on the status of a land dispute in the Bennett Freeze Area in the western section of the Navajo Reservation, which is not covered by the 1974 act. In summary, we found that the relocation program was not completed in 1986, as anticipated, because more families than expected applied for relocation, and the Navajo reservation had insufficient land to accommodate new homesites for all the relocatees who wanted to move there.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hopi Reservation Quick Facts
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION College of Agriculture and Life Sciences AZ1465 10/08 The Hopi Reservation Quick Facts Located on the Colorado Plateau in northern Arizona, the high desert grasslands, pinyon-juniper woodlands, and Hopi people trace their history in Arizona to more than 2,000 ponderosa pine forests. Traditionally, plants and game were years, but their history as a people goes back many more harvested from all these communities, and many tribal thousands of years. According to their legends, the Hopi members continue to harvest wild plants and game today. migrated north to Arizona from the south, up from what is Rangeland and farming areas are managed for agricultural now South America, Central America and Mexico. activities such as livestock ranching and dryland farming, The Tribe also monitors water quality at dozens of springs The Hopi Reservation occupies part of Navajo and and wetlands and has conducted restoration activities at Coconino counties and encompasses approximately several of these sites. 1,542,306 acres. Having inhabited this high and dry area since the 12th century, the Hopi have developed a unique There are many research topics of current interest agriculture practice, “dry farming”. for which the Tribe has established programs and data, including the following: The Hopi Tribe has a Tribal Council that includes both elected and appointed representatives depending on the • Health and traditional foods, with an ongoing interest village that sends them to council. Some Hopi Villages in community wellness and participatory research choose to not send representatives to Tribal Council. Throughout the Hopi reservation, every village is an • Rangelands and wildlife, including treatment of autonomous government.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Navajo County Regional Corridor TIGER Grant Application
    THE HOPI TRIBE Northern Navajo County Regional Corridor TIGER Grant Application The Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Bureau of Indian Affairs: Hopi Agency, and Navajo County September 15, 2009 NORTHERN NAVAJO COUNTY REGIONAL CORRIDOR TIGER GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT SUMMARY Project Type: Highway Location: Arizona, Hopi Nation, Congressional District 1 Rural Indian Country TIGER Grant Funds Requested: $21.9 million Application contains no confidential information PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT Mary A. Felter, Tribal Secretary/Acting CEO The Hopi Tribe P.O. Box 123, Kykotsmovi, Arizona 86039 Office: 928-734-3131 Cell: 928-863-9567 Fax: 928-734-3139 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected]; [email protected] Agency Web site: None. DUNS: 116136961 Legal Business Name – Hopi Tribe CCR: Active in CCR; Registration valid until 06/17/2010 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Major Connector Route from Pinon, Black Mesa, Forest Lake, Tachee/Blue Gap, Whippoorwill, Low Mountain, Polacca , Keams Canyon, Forest Lakes, Second Mesa from these Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe Reservation communities to Arizona State Hwy 264. Hopi BIA Route 60 Project The Hopi Route 60 road is a major artery of traffic flow for residents, schools, emergency vehicles, and commercial vendors. Due to a substandard 13.7 mile stretch of dirt road both the Hopi and Navajo Page 2 NORTHERN NAVAJO COUNTY REGIONAL CORRIDOR TIGER GRANT APPLICATION Tribes economy and way of life suffers. Without the construction of a paved roadway the Hopi and Navajo Tribes will continue to be significantly hampered in their ability to provide a safe and reliable access route and remain stagnant economically. Hopi BIA Route 60 is the most direct route from regional commercial and industrial hubs of Flagstaff, Winslow, Holbrook and Show Low to residential communities on the Hopi Tribe Reservation and Navajo Nation and other tribal destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • North Central Arizona Water Supply Study
    North Central Arizona Water Supply Study Report of Findings U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado October 2006 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. ___________________________ The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. North Central Arizona Water Supply Study Report of Findings U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado October 2006 Disclaimer The water demand assumptions and resulting future conditions described in this Report of Findings reflect the position of the study’s partners and stakeholder groups. The use of these assumptions and resulting future conditions in the Report of Findings does not reflect any agreement by the Bureau of Reclamation and has no bearing on the position the Department of the Interior may take with respect to the Indian water rights settlement negotiations or litigation. North Central Arizona Water Supply Study—Report of Findings Executive Summary Study Purpose As the result of ongoing drought conditions in the Coconino Plateau region and the findings of the North Central Arizona Regional Water Study Phase One Report, stakeholders in the region requested that the Bureau of Reclamation conduct a regional water study to: • Determine if water demand in the demand areas is unmet (projected to the year 2050) • If the demand is unmet, determine if there is at least one regional alternative to meet future demands • Determine if there is a Federal objective in which there exists at least one regional plan that can be recommended to be carried forward into a Feasibility Study.
    [Show full text]
  • LPFM) Radio Service ) MB Docket ______
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC In the matter of: ) ) RM-__________ Improvements to the Low Power FM ) (LPFM) Radio Service ) MB Docket _____________ ) PETITION FOR RULEMAKING TABLE OF CONTENTS PETITION FOR RULEMAKING Introduction 3 THE UNIQUE CHALLENGES FACED BY LPFM STATIONS 3 Real-world case: WDFC-LP 4 Real-world case: WBED-LP 5 Real-world case: KLEK-LP 5 Real-world case: KQRP-LP 5 INTRODUCE NEW LP-250 SERVICE AS AN UPGRADE TO LP-100 Introduction 7 Issues previously raised 8 Introducing a new class of service 11 The introduction of LP-250 is compliant with the Local Community Radio Act 11 INTERFERENCE PROTECTION TO FULL POWER STATIONS Reducing the “buffer zone” 12 Co-channel and first adjacent channel protections 13 Second adjacent channel protection 14 Protection to Radio Reading Services 15 Intermediate Frequency 15 Proposed Spacing Tables 16 Super-powered Stations 17 Foothill Effect LPFM stations 17 Additional protection for “Foothill” full-service facilities 19 INTERFERENCE PROTECTION TO FM TRANSLATORS AND BOOSTERS 20 1 PROTECTION TO FOREIGN STATIONS Protection to Canada 21 Protection to Mexico (125 to 320 km) 22 Mexican Strip Zone (less than 125km) 22 British Virgin Islands 23 PROTECTION TO OTHER LOW POWER FM STATIONS 24 IMPLEMENTATION OF LP-250 SERVICE Classification of change 24 Upgrades only 25 Introduction period 25 Automatic Upgrade Authority 26 LP-250 for some, will be an engineered service 28 The REC LP-250 Proposal in summary form 29 A large majority of LPFM stations can upgrade 30 PROTECTION
    [Show full text]