The Historical Development of Agricultural Policy and Urban Planning in Southern Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Historical Development of Agricultural Policy and Urban Planning in Southern Ontario Settlement, Food Lands, and Sustainable Habitation: The Historical Development of Agricultural Policy and Urban Planning in Southern Ontario By: Joel Fridman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Geography, Collaborative Program in Environmental Studies Department of Geography and Program in Planning University of Toronto © Copyright by Joel Fridman 2014 Settlement, Food Lands, and Sustainable Habitation: The Historical Development of Agricultural Policy and Urban Planning in Southern Ontario Joel Fridman Masters of Arts in Geography, Collaborative Program in Environmental Studies Department of Geography and Program in Planning University of Toronto 2014 Abstract In this thesis I recount the historical relationship between settlement and food lands in Southern Ontario. Informed by landscape and food regime theory, I use a landscape approach to interpret the history of this relationship to deepen our understanding of a pertinent, and historically specific problem of land access for sustainable farming. This thesis presents entrenched barriers to landscape renewal as institutional legacies of various layers of history. It argues that at the moment and for the last century Southern Ontario has had two different, parallel sets of determinants for land use operating on the same landscape in the form of agricultural policy and urban planning. To the extent that they are not purposefully coordinated, not just with each other but with the social and ecological foundations of our habitation, this is at the root of the problem of land access for sustainable farming. ii Acknowledgements This thesis is accomplished with the help and support of many. I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Harriet Friedmann, for kindly encouraging me in the right direction. I would also thank my committee members, Professor Sarah Wakefield and Professor Ken MacDonald for their guidance and helpful comments. Thank you to Professor Alison Blay-Palmer and the Nourishing Ontario Research Group for providing me the opportunity to engage in the issues I care about, and for supporting me in the research stages of the project. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council also supported this research. Finally, thank you to my family and friends, your love and support is unwavering. iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 2. Literature and Methodology - The Landscape Approach ................................... 10 2.1 Understanding Agricultural Land Use: Land Value, Land use Planning, and Property Rights Perspectives.....................................................................................10 2.2 Food Regime Theory.........................................................................................................13 2.3 Landscape Theory .............................................................................................................14 2.4 The Landscape Approach................................................................................................15 2.5 Methods.................................................................................................................................18 3. The Historical Development of Agricultural Policy and Urban Planning in Southern Ontario .................................................................................................................. 19 3.1 Food Getting and Settlement Among Indigenous Bioregional Networks .......19 3.2 1613–1763: European Contact to The Royal Proclamation - European Out- posts Within an Indigenous Landscape, Connecting Bioregional to Transatlantic Trade.......................................................................................................24 3.3 1763-1841: Constructing a Colonial Landscape - Organization of Land and Property in British North America...........................................................................33 3.4 1841-1867: The Shifting Colonial Landscape - Forging the Railroads and the Reciprocal Evolution of Farms and Towns in a Rapidly Changing Landscape. ..............................................................................................................................................50 3.5 1867-1914: Confederation to the First World War - The Southern Ontario Landscape within the Canadian Nation-State Adapts to Westward Expansion..........................................................................................................................62 3.6 1914 -1947: Creating the Urban Rural Divide - The Foundations of Urban Planning and Agricultural Policy in Times of Global Crisis. ............................75 3.7 1945-1973: Industrialization of the Southern Ontario Landscape - Intensive Farm Production Amid Encroaching Urban Settlement....................................88 3.8 1973-Present: Land Reregulation in Times of Global Capital Deregulation - Farm Preservation and Barriers to Diverse Sets of Rural-Urban Relationships................................................................................................................ 113 4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................137 Bibliography.........................................................................................................................141 iv 1. Introduction Couched between a west branch of the Humber River on one side and rows of houses on the other, in the heart of suburban Brampton just north and west of Toronto, sits 45 acres of prime, certified organic soil cultivated by 36 new farmers – 20 different farm enterprises in all. These 45 acres make up McVean Farm, one of two farms run by FarmStart, an organization based in Guelph, Ontario that seeks to support a new generation of farmers. FarmStart engages anyone who desires to farm in a different a way: those who want to start farms of a small to medium scale, without intensive mechanization or heavy use of external inputs; who want to farm a diversity of crops for markets, instead of just one or even a handful; and those who want to farm in a way that works in partnership with nature, rather than in a way that seeks to dominate it (FarmStart 2013). FarmStart aims to encourage and support a new generation who want to practice ecological farming. Growing numbers of people want to farm in an ecological way. Those who approach FarmStart tend to be young, urban-born Canadians removed from any direct farm heritage, second career farmers who wish to turn away from the practices honed in more conventional farming operations, as well as newcomers to Canada who have come to settle in the Greater Toronto Area – even those who may have lived in Canada for as many as 15 years – who have experience and a recent history of farming in the country whence they came. These potential farmers desire to farm with different land parcel sizes, different inputs, different values, and with different relationships to urban markets than is conventionally the case within the agricultural sector in Ontario, where farming contributes significantly to the Ontario economy (Wolfson 2010) but where it is generally practiced on parcels of over two hundred acres, is highly mechanized using the latest technology in farm equipment, has generally high uses of fertilizers and pesticides and is predominantly export-oriented (Filson 2005). FarmStart’s objective is to give people new to farming in Southern Ontario a low- risk way to start and a place to develop ecological farming practices, in order to support new farmers starting their own viable, ecologically sound farm enterprises. FarmStart calls McVean Farm an “incubator farm.” The 45 acre parcel that makes up McVean is leased from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). It is a place where 1 those interested in starting a farm based on ecological land use principles, seeking fulfillment through a meaningful farming career and livelihood, can come and try their hand at it and learn the seasons, soils, and market opportunities in Ontario. Farmers entering FarmStart’s start-up program have up to six years at McVean, where they can rent one to fives acres of land, enroll in a few workshops, and build a farm business plan while receiving the advice of FarmStart staff as well as the help of one permanent Farm Manager. FarmStart started in 2005, because, as they proclaim, we in Ontario, and in Canada more broadly, are facing a “crisis of renewal” in the farm sector (FarmStart 2013). The current farm population in Ontario is aging, and with traditional farm succession diminishing, few are taking the place of retiring farmers. Young people in traditional farming communities are moving off the farm in great numbers. Canada-wide, farmers under the age of 35 represent only 8.2% of total farmers in 2011, which is lower than in 2006 and less than half the proportion of young farmers two decades ago (Statistics Canada 2011). Ontario is losing its already historically diminished farmer population. Meanwhile, of the farmers who are retiring, they have come to depend on their land for their retirement savings (Bunce and Maurer 2005). With no family succession plans, retiring farmers are selling their land at speculative prices for their retirement income, and farmland is being converted to non- agricultural uses, primarily for urban-type development (Caldwell and Weir 2002). The farmland
Recommended publications
  • ELECTORAL DISTRICTS Proposal for the Province of Ontario Published
    ELECTORAL DISTRICTS Proposal for the Province of Ontario Published pursuant to the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act Table of Contents Preamble ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Process for Electoral Readjustment ................................................................................................ 3 Notice of Sittings for the Hearing of Representations .................................................................... 4 Requirements for Making Submissions During Commission Hearings ......................................... 5 Rules for Making Representations .................................................................................................. 6 Reasons for the Proposed Electoral Boundaries ............................................................................. 8 Schedule A – Electoral District Population Tables....................................................................... 31 Schedule B – Maps, Proposed Boundaries and Names of Electoral Districts .............................. 37 2 FEDERAL ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES COMMISSION FOR THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO PROPOSAL Preamble The number of electoral districts represented in the House of Commons is derived from the formula and rules set out in sections 51 and 51A of the Constitution Act, 1867. This formula takes into account changes to provincial population, as reflected in population estimates in the year of the most recent decennial census. The increase
    [Show full text]
  • Trailside Esterbrooke Kingslake Harringay
    MILLIKEN COMMUNITY TRAIL CONTINUES TRAIL CONTINUES CENTRE INTO VAUGHAN INTO MARKHAM Roxanne Enchanted Hills Codlin Anthia Scoville P Codlin Minglehaze THACKERAY PARK Cabana English Song Meadoway Glencoyne Frank Rivers Captains Way Goldhawk Wilderness MILLIKEN PARK - CEDARBRAE Murray Ross Festival Tanjoe Ashcott Cascaden Cathy Jean Flax Gardenway Gossamer Grove Kelvin Covewood Flatwoods Holmbush Redlea Duxbury Nipigon Holmbush Provence Nipigon Forest New GOLF & COUNTRY Anthia Huntsmill New Forest Shockley Carnival Greenwin Village Ivyway Inniscross Raynes Enchanted Hills CONCESSION Goodmark Alabast Beulah Alness Inniscross Hullmar Townsend Goldenwood Saddletree Franca Rockland Janus Hollyberry Manilow Port Royal Green Bush Aspenwood Chapel Park Founders Magnetic Sandyhook Irondale Klondike Roxanne Harrington Edgar Woods Fisherville Abitibi Goldwood Mintwood Hollyberry Canongate CLUB Cabernet Turbine 400 Crispin MILLIKENMILLIKEN Breanna Eagleview Pennmarric BLACK CREEK Carpenter Grove River BLACK CREEK West North Albany Tarbert Select Lillian Signal Hill Hill Signal Highbridge Arran Markbrook Barmac Wheelwright Cherrystone Birchway Yellow Strawberry Hills Strawberry Select Steinway Rossdean Bestview Freshmeadow Belinda Eagledance BordeauxBrunello Primula Garyray G. ROSS Fontainbleau Cherrystone Ockwell Manor Chianti Cabernet Laureleaf Shenstone Torresdale Athabaska Limestone Regis Robinter Lambeth Wintermute WOODLANDS PIONEER Russfax Creekside Michigan . Husband EAST Reesor Plowshare Ian MacDonald Nevada Grenbeck ROWNTREE MILLS PARK Blacksmith
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Our Priorities
    reconciling our priorities reconciling reconciling annual report 2006–2007 our environmental commissioner of ontario environmental commissioner of ontario environmental annual report 2006–2007 priorities This Annual Report is printed on Canadian-made Rolland Enviro100 paper manufactured from 100% post-consumer waste fibre, is Process Chlorine Free (PCF) and used BioGas in its production (an alternative “green energy” source produced from decomposing waste collected from landfill sites) to reduce greenhouse emissions and the depletion of the ozone layer. Rolland Enviro100 saves the harvesting of mature trees, reduces solid waste that would have gone into landfill sites, uses 80% less water than conven- tional paper manufacturing and helps reduce air and water pollution. Certified Processed Chlorine Free 100% Post-Consumer Waste Fibre Recyclable Where facilities Exist Green Energy Source Environmental Commissioner of Ontario 1075 Bay Street, Suite 605 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2B1 Telephone: 416-325-3377 Fax: 416-325-3370 Toll Free: 1-800-701-6454 www.eco.on.ca Disponible en français ISSN 1205-7649 ECO Staff List 2006/2007 ROBERT BLAQUIERE Systems, Webmaster & Case Manager EMILY CHATTEN Policy & Decision Analyst BEV DOTTIN Information Officer DENNIS DRAPER Senior Policy Advisor HAYLEY EASTO Communications & Outreach Coordinator LIZ FARKAS Library Assistant CARRIE HACKETT Resource Centre Librarian GREG JENISH Policy & Decision Analyst MICHELLE KASSEL Policy & Decision Analyst PETER LAPP Executive Assistant LYNDA LUKASIK Policy & Decision Analyst DAVID MCROBERT In-House Counsel/Sr. Policy Advisor RACHEL MELZER Policy & Decision Analyst CYNTHIA ROBINSON Office Administrator NADINE SAWH Case Management Assistant ELLEN SCHWARTZEL Senior Manager – Policy Analysis LISA SHULTZ Policy & Decision Analyst CHRIS WILKINSON Policy & Decision Analyst FIZZZ DESIGN CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • The North York East LIP Strategic Plan and Report
    The North York East LIP Strategic Plan and Report The North York East Strategic Plan has been developed around six areas of focus: Information & Outreach; Civic Engagement; Collaboration & Capacity Building; Language Training & Supports; Labour Market; and Health Services.Six working groups will be established to address these areas of focus. In- depth directions for each working group are outlined in the main body of this report Executive Summary In 2009, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), in partnership with the Ontario Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, launched Local Immigration Partnership (LIP) projects throughout Ontario. LIPs were developed as research initiatives to identify ways to coordinate and enhance local service delivery to newcomers across the province, while promoting efficient use of resources. In October 2009, Working Women Community Centre entered an agreement with CIC to lead a LIP project in the North York East area of Toronto. The North York East LIP is located in the far north of the city, contained by Steeles Avenue to the north, Highway 401 to the south, Victoria Avenue East to the east and the Don Valley River to the west. The area population is almost 80,000, 70% of which are immigrants to Canada. A major priority for the North York East LIP project was to root its research in the real-life experiences of local newcomers and local community organizations. In total, over 400 newcomers & immigrants, and over 100 service providers were consulted and engaged with to identify challenges, solutions and new directions for the settlement sector in the area. Methods of engagement for both newcomers and service providers included focus group research, key-informant interviews, community consultations and advisory panel workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2
    ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL Area 83 Eastern Ontario International Area Committee Minutes June 2, 2018 ACM – June 2, 2018 1 ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AREA 83 EASTERN ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL 1. OPENING…………………………………………………………………………….…………….…4 2. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA………………………………….…………….…...7 3. ROLL CALL………………………………………………………………………….……………….7 4. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF September 9, 2017 ACM…………………7 5. DISTRICT COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ REPORTS ……………………………………………....8 District 02 Malton……………………………………………………………………………….…….. 8 District 06 Mississauga……………………………………………………………………….…….. 8 District 10 Toronto South Central…………………………………………………………….….…. 8 District 12 Toronto South West………………………………………………………………….…. 9 District 14 Toronto North Central………………………………………………………………..….. 9 District 16 Distrito Hispano de Toronto…………………………………………………….………..9 District 18 Toronto City East……………………………………………………………………........9 District 22 Scarborough……………………………………………………………………………… 9 District 26 Lakeshore West………………………………………………………………….……….10 District 28 Lakeshore East……………………………………………………………………………11 District 30 Quinte West…………………………………………………………………………….. 11 District 34 Quinte East……………………………………………………………………………… 12 District 36 Kingston & the Islands……………………………………………………………….… 12 District 42 St. Lawrence International………………………………………………………………. 12 District 48 Seaway Valley North……………………………………………………………….……. 13 District 50 Cornwall…………………………………………………………………………………… 13 District 54 Ottawa Rideau……………………………………………………………………………. 13 District 58 Ottawa Bytown……………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto North & East Office Market Report
    Fourth Quarter 2019 / Office Market Report Toronto North & East Photo credit: York Region Quick Stats Collectively, the Toronto North and East office with 66,500 sf – lifting the overall market and 11.6% markets finished the fourth quarter and 2019 offsetting losses in the Yorkdale and Dufferin Overall availability rate in Toronto in positive territory. Combined occupancy and Finch nodes. SmartCentres’ mixed-use North, vs. 10.2% one year ago levels increased 358,000 square feet (sf) PWC-YMCA tower on Apple Mill Rd. in the with class B buildings in the East and class A Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (103,000 sf 10% buildings in the North making up the bulk of office space) opened for occupancy in Vaughan sublet available space of the gain. Quarter-over-quarter, overall November with PWC taking possession of four as a percentage of total available availability rose 30 basis points (bps) to 11.9%, floors (77,000 sf) for 230-plus employees. space while vacancy held steady at 7.2%. Available sublet space also remained flat, at 903,000 sf, The North market’s overall availability 190,800 sf as gains in the East market balanced losses jumped 130 bps quarter-over-quarter to Total new office area built in the 11.6% and sits 140 bps higher than one year Toronto North and East markets in the North. The East had an exceptionally during 2019 – all in Vaughan strong showing in 2019, as occupancy ago. This was largely attributed to RioCan increased 455,000 sf year-over-year. It was also REIT marketing a 99,000-sf contiguous block 5 a year of big lease transactions including: Bell over six floors (currently occupied by BMO Buildings with largest contiguous Canada (445,000 sf), Scotiabank (406,000 sf), Financial) at 4881 Yonge St.
    [Show full text]
  • OBSP Screening Site Locations (Wheelchair Accessible)
    OBSP Screening Site Locations Provincial Toll-Free Number: 1-800-668-9304 Regional OBSP Centres: Greater Toronto North York Women’s Centre ËB (416) 512-0601 Area (G.T.A.): 100 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 140 North York, Ontario M2N 6N5 Hamilton Sir William Osler Health Institute ËB (905) 389-0101 565 Sanatorium Road, Suite 207 Hamilton, Ontario L9C 7N4 Kingston 786 Blackburn Mews ËB (613) 384-4284 Kingston, Ontario 1 (800) 465-8850 K7P 2N7 Ottawa Hampton Park Plaza, 1419 Carling Ave. ËB (613) 728-0777 Suite 214 (2nd Floor), Ottawa, Ontario 1 (800) 465-6226 K1Z 7L6 Thunder Bay 984 Oliver Road, 4th Floor ËB (807) 684-7777 Thunder Bay, Ontario 1 (800) 461-7031 P7B 7C7 London 339 Talbot Street ËB (519) 432-0255 London, Ontario 1 (800) 461-0640 N6A 2R5 Windsor Walker Plaza 1200, ËB (519) 253-0903 1275 Walker Road, Unit 10 Windsor, Ontario N8Y 4X9 Sudbury 4 Walford Road ËB (705) 675-2283 Sudbury, Ontario 1 (800) 661-8897 P3E 2H4 Ë - Wheelchair accessible B – French Language Services Last revised: June 19, 2009 1 OBSP Affiliated Screening Sites: The OBSP Affiliated Screening Centres are listed here below according to the Local Health Information Network (LHIN) area they are located in. To determine which LHIN you reside in, go to the following website and enter your postal code: http://www.lhins.on.ca/FindYourLHIN.aspx, or Call the ministry INFO line at 1-888-779-7767 #1 Erie St. Clair LHIN City Site Name Address Booking Number Chatham Chatham-Kent Health Alliance, Chatham Campus ËB 80 Grand Avenue West (519) 437-6012 Chatham, ON N7L 1B7 Leamington
    [Show full text]
  • CMHA Quick Guide to Mental Health Resources
    Toronto Quick Guide Mental Health Resources Serving Toronto Minimum size ABUSE Abrigo Centre 416-534-3434 Advocacy Centre for the Elderly 416-598-2656 Barbara Schlifer Clinic 416-323-9149 x 234 Boost - Child & Youth Advocacy Centre 416-515-1100 Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture 416-363-1066 Children’s Aid Society 416-924-4646 Women’s College Hospital - WRAP 416-323-6400 x 4863 (Women Recovering from Abuse) Victim Services 416-808-7066 ADDICTIONS Access CAMH 416-535-8501 Option 2 (Centre for Addiction & Mental Health) The Access Point www.theaccesspoint.ca 1-888-640-1934 Breakaway Addiction Services 416-234-1942 DART - Drug and Alcohol Registry 1-800-565-8603 Ontario Problem Gambling Helpline 1-888-230-3505 The Salvation Army Homestead 416-431-4379 Toronto Detox 1-866-366-9513 Women’s College Hospital Rapid Access Addiction Medicine (RAAM) Clinic: 76 Grenville Street, 3rd floor Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Walk-in clinic - arrive before 11:30 for registration. ANGER MANAGEMENT Access CAMH 416-535-8501 Option 2 (Centre for Addiction & Mental Health) Central Toronto Youth Services 416-924-2100 Family Service Association of Toronto 416-595-9618 John Howard Society 416-925-4386 Salvation Army, Correctional & Justice Services 416-304-1974 (by referral from probation officers only) Tropicana Community Services 416-439-9009 Yorktown Family Services 416-394-2424 ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT (ACT) The Access Point www.theaccesspoint.ca 1-888-640-1934 BEREAVEMENT Bereaved Families of Ontario-Toronto (Multi-Faith) 416-440-0290
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking in Ontario Ulysses Travel Guides in of All Ontario’S Regions, with an Overview of Their Many Natural and Cultural Digital PDF Format Treasures
    Anytime, Anywhere in Hiking The most complete guide the World! with descriptions of some 400 trails in in Ontario 70 parks and conservation areas. In-depth coverage Hiking in Ontario in Hiking Ulysses Travel Guides in of all Ontario’s regions, with an overview of their many natural and cultural Digital PDF Format treasures. Practical information www.ulyssesguides.com from trail diffi culty ratings to trailheads and services, to enable you to carefully plan your hiking adventure. Handy trail lists including our favourite hikes, wheelchair accessible paths, trails with scenic views, historical journeys and animal lover walks. Clear maps and directions to keep you on the right track and help you get the most out of your walks. Take a hike... in Ontario! $ 24.95 CAD ISBN: 978-289464-827-8 This guide is also available in digital format (PDF). Travel better, enjoy more Extrait de la publication See the trail lists on p.287-288 A. Southern Ontario D. Eastern Ontario B. Greater Toronto and the Niagara Peninsula E. Northeastern Ontario Hiking in Ontario C. Central Ontario F. Northwestern Ontario Sudbury Sturgeon 0 150 300 km ntario Warren Falls North Bay Mattawa Rolphton NorthernSee Inset O 17 Whitefish 17 Deux l Lake Nipissing Callander Rivières rai Ottawa a T Deep River Trans Canad Espanola Killarney 69 Massey Waltham 6 Prov. Park 11 Petawawa QUÉBEC National Whitefish French River River 18 Falls Algonquin Campbell's Bay Gatineau North Channel Trail Port Loring Pembroke Plantagenet Little Current Provincial Park 17 Park Gore Bay Sundridge Shawville
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation Reports
    Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform Public Consultation Reports February 2007 overview what we heard what we read special outreach focus groups ONTARIO CITIZENS’ ASSEMBLY ON ELECTORAL REFORM CONSULTATION REPORTS overview From October 2006 through January 2007, the Citizens’Assembly on Electoral Reform undertook consultations with Ontario citi- In addition, many Assembly members undertook out- zens to learn what they value in an electoral system. reach in their own communities to get the word out The Assembly began the process with the release of about the Assembly and to find out what people in its public consultation guide,“Citizens Talking to their ridings thought about electoral reform. Citizens.”The guide asked the public four questions: While people participated in the consultation in 1. Which electoral system principles are most different ways, they had at least one thing in common: important to you? Why? a concern for the future of Ontario and the shape • Are there other principles you think are of one of its most important political institutions. important? Why? Altogether, about 3,000 people shared their views 2. Does Ontario’s current electoral system reflect the with the Assembly.They were people who had principles that are important to you? If yes, why? studied electoral systems and people who had not; If no, why not? people who were young and not so young; individual citizens and representatives of organizations; and 3. Do you think Ontario should keep its current people diverse in occupation, political stripe, electoral system or change to a different one? culture, experience, and point of view.The • If you think Ontario should change to a participants were as diverse as the Assembly itself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • National Capital Commission
    NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION Summary of the Corporate Plan 2016–2017 to 2020–2021 www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca 202–40 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Canada K1P 1C7 Email: [email protected] • Fax: 613-239-5063 Telephone: 613-239-5000 • Toll-free: 1-800-465-1867 TTY: 613-239-5090 • Toll-free TTY: 1-866-661-3530 Unless otherwise noted, all imagery is the property of the National Capital Commission. National Capital Commission Summary of the Corporate Plan 2016–2017 to 2020–2021 Catalogue number: W91-2E-PDF ISSN: 1926-0490 The National Capital Commission is dedicated to building a dynamic, sustainable, inspiring capital that is a source of pride for all Canadians and a legacy for generations to come. NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION ASSETS 10% The National Capital Commission owns over 10 percent of the lands in Canada’s Capital Region, totalling 473 km2, and 20 percent of the lands in the Capital’s core. This makes the National Capital Commission the region’s largest landowner. 361 km2 200 km2 The National Capital Commission is responsible The National Capital Commission is responsible for the management of Gatineau Park, which for the management of the Greenbelt, covers an area of 361 km2. Some 2.7 million which covers an area of 200 km2. The visits are made to Gatineau Park each year. Greenbelt provides 150 kilometres of trails for recreational activities. 106 km 15 The National Capital Commission owns The National Capital Commission manages 106 km of parkways in Ottawa and 15 urban parks and green spaces in the Gatineau Park, as well as over 200 km Capital Region, including Confederation Park, of recreational pathways that are part Vincent Massey Park, Major’s Hill Park and of the Capital Pathway network.
    [Show full text]