DOCSLIB.ORG

Sessional Diary 2006–07

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2006–07 15 November 2006 to 30 October 2007 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2006–07, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes (and are not itemised in the analysis), and the time at which the House rose is taken from the Votes and Proceedings. (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14h of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 5. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”. In Session 2006–07, these times were as follows: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 2200 2200 1900 1800 1430 * 2200 on the day of the State Opening of Parliament and immediately following a periodic adjournment. (f) All times are in hours and minutes, using the 24-hour clock. 2. A Sessional Diary has been kept in the Journal Office for most sessions since 1906, although in the early years times were kept only to the nearest quarter hour. An analysis substantially in the current form begins in the 1960s. The totals from the analysis have been reproduced in the Sessional Information Digest since 1984–85 and in the House’s Sessional Returns since 1987–88. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS AND TOTALS Part Contents Duration After Page appoin- ted time I Diary for House 1 II Analysis for House 1118.52 84.51 1. Addresses other than Prayers 40.14 0.59 55 2. Government bills 298.11 10.15 a Second readings: committed to standing 97.46 1.36 55 committee b Second readings: committal to Committee of 22.02 0.21 56 whole House (wholly or partly) c Second readings: no committal (Consolidation — — bills) d Committee of the whole House 20.44 0.58 56 e Consideration 105.17 2.11 56 f Third reading 18.04 1.45 57 g Lords amendments 31.22 2.14 57 h Allocation of time motions 1.18 0.57 58 i Committal and carry-over motions 1.38 0.13 58 3. Private Members’ bills 61.17 0.17 a Second readings (and all stages) 42.35 0.11 58 b Later stages 18.42 0.06 59 4. Private bills at time for opposed private business 2.32 — 60 5. Government motions 43.56 2.52 a European Union documents 4.58 0.47 60 b Business motions 0.28 — 60 c General 38.30 2.05 60 6. Opposition business 116.49 7.01 a Opposition days 116.49 7.01 60 b Opposition motions in Government time — — 7. Private Members’ motions 17.39 — a Substantive motions 8.03 — 61 b Ten-minute rule motions 9.36 — 62 8. Adjournment motions 218.51 53.16 a Government 129.20 3.04 63 b Recess 18.08 — 64 c S.O. No. 24 debates — — d Daily 71.23 50.12 64 9. Estimates 16.23 0.08 67 iii Part Contents Duration After Page appoin- ted time 10. Money Resolutions 0.37 0.37 67 11. Ways and Means 25.24 2.57 67 12. Affirmative Statutory Instruments 16.15 — 68 13. Negative Statutory Instruments 1.46 — 68 14. Business when no Question before House 246.45 6.29 a Questions 122.28 — 68 b Urgent Questions 6.00 — 71 c Statements 72.48 0.37 72 d Business Statements 27.31 — 75 e S.O. No. 24 Applications 0.14 — 75 f Points of order 4.17 0.18 76 g Public petitions 3.16 2.23 82 h Miscellaneous 10.11 3.11 85 15. Daily prayers 12.13 — 85 III Diary for Westminster Hall 86 IV Analysis for Westminster Hall 355.22 — 1. Private Members’ Adjournment Debates 271.08 — 103 2. Government Adjournment Debates 16.20 — 109 3. Liaison Committee Adjournment Debates 57.32 — 109 4. Questions — — 5. Miscellaneous 10.22 — 110 iv PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE 1 PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE Time Subject Duration After appointed time 1. Wednesday 15th November 2006 11.25 Prayers 0.05 11.30 Suspension 3.00 14.30 Miscellaneous: Speaker’s Statement [Duties and responsibilities of Members] 0.05 14.35 Address: [1st Day] 7.07 21.42 Adjournment: Jonathan Shaw: National DNA Database 0.34 0.16 22.16 House Rose [Totals for session: 10.51; 0.16] 10.51 0.16 2. Thursday 16th November 2006 10.30 Prayers 0.05 10.35 Business Statement 0.44 11.19 Address: [2nd Day] 6.42 0.01 18.01 Public Petition: Mr Anthony Steen: TSB Bank (Buckfastleigh) 0.01 0.01 18.02 Adjournment: Mr Graham Stuart: Sexual and Mental Health Services 0.28 0.28 (Yorkshire) 18.30 House Rose [Totals for session: 18.51; 0.46] 8.00 0.30 3. Monday 20th November 2006 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Points of Order: Mr Philip Hammond: questioning the system used for 0.02 answering written questions in the Department of Work and Pensions. John Bercow: asking if the Speaker had received a request from the Foreign Secretary to make a statement to the House about the situation in Darfur. 14.37 Address: [3rd Day] 7.23 22.00 Public Petitions: Bob Spink: High Road, Benfleet 0.03 0.03 Mr Robert Walter: Blandford Camp 22.03 Adjournment: Bob Spink: Liquefied Natural Gas (Canvey Island) 0.28 0.28 22.31 House Rose [Totals for session: 26.52; 1.17] 8.01 0.31 4. Tuesday 21st November 2006 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Questions: Transport (39); Constitutional Affairs (18) 0.57 15.32 Second Reading: Northern Ireland (St Andrews Agreement) Bill 4.00 Committed to Committee of the whole House 19.32 Committee of the Whole House: Northern Ireland (St Andrews Agreement) Bill 2.33 0.05 [Division] 22.05 Adjournment: Mr Kevan Jones: Public Parks 0.28 0.28 22.33 House Rose [Totals for session: 34.55; 1.50] 8.03 0.33 2 SESSIONAL DIARY, 2006–07 Time Subject Duration After appointed time 5. Wednesday 22nd November 2006 11.30 Prayers 0.05 11.35 Questions: Northern Ireland (25); Prime Minister (32) 0.57 12.32 Address: [4th Day] 6.26 18.58 Business of the House 0.02 19.00 Suspension 3.10 3.10 22.10 Royal Assent 0.01 0.01 22.11 Public Petition: Tim Farron: Alzheimer’s drugs 0.01 0.01 22.12 Adjournment: Mr Christopher Fraser: Prostate Cancer 0.29 0.29 22.41 House Rose [Totals for session: 46.06; 5.31] 11.11 3.41 6. Thursday 23rd November 2006 10.30 Prayers 0.05 10.35 Questions: Education and Skills (46); Solicitor-General (10) 0.56 11.31 Business Statement 0.46 12.17 Address: [5th Day] [Division] 5.57 0.14 18.14 Public Petitions: Mr David Ruffley: St Edmund 0.02 0.02 Mr Jonathan Djanogly: Hinchingbrooke Hospital 18.16 Adjournment: Mr Martin Caton: Cluster Munitions 0.30 0.30 18.46 House Rose [Totals for session: 54.22; 6.17] 8.16 0.46 7. Monday 27th November 2006 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Questions: Work and Pensions (47); House of Commons Commission (10) 0.57 15.32 Urgent Question: David Davis: Alexander Litvinenko 0.31 16.03 Points of Order: Mark Pritchard: asking the Speaker if he had been informed of a 0.02 change of name. Adam Price: asking about a Government announcement made outside the House. 16.05 Address: [6th Day] [Divisions] 6.39 0.44 22.44 Public Petitions: Philip Davies: Bingley Post Office 0.03 0.03 Mr Iain Wright: Acute services in Teeside Mr Oliver Letwin: Rural Post Offices 22.47 Adjournment: Mr Gordon Prentice: Christians in Pakistan 0.27 0.27 23.14 House Rose [Totals for session: 63.06; 7.31] 8.44 1.14 PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE 3 Time Subject Duration After appointed time 8. Tuesday 28th November 2006 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Questions: Health 0.57 15.32 Statement: The Minister for Local Government (Mr Phil Woolas): Local 0.45 Government Finance Settlement 16.17 Allocation of Time: Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill 0.07 16.24 Second Reading: Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill 2.34 Committed to a Committee of the whole House 18.58 Committee of the whole House: Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill 1.16 20.14 Third Reading: Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses Bill 0.15 20.29 Public Petitions: Mr Peter Bone: Cycle Helmets 0.04 Bob Spink: Public Toilets (Thundersley) 20.33 Adjournment: Mr David Heathcoat-Amory: Local Government Reorganisation 1.00 (Somerset) 21.33 House Rose [Totals for session: 70.09; 7.31] 7.03 0.00 9.
Recommended publications
  • (Amendment) Bill

    (Amendment) Bill

    Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport with the agreement of Theresa Villiers, are published separately as Bill 182—EN. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill CONTENTS 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision 2 Extent, commencement and short title Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill 1 A BILL TO Prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision In section 4 of the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009— (a) in the heading, for “, commencement and sunset” substitute “and commencement”, and (b) omit subsection (7) (which provides for the Act to expire after 10 years). 5 2 Extent, commencement and short title (1) This Act extends to— (a) England and Wales, and (b) Scotland. (2) This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed. 10 (3) This Act may be cited as the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Act 2018. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill A BILL To prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019.
  • Celebrities As Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field

    Celebrities As Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field

    Celebrities as Political Representatives: Explaining the Exchangeability of Celebrity Capital in the Political Field Ellen Watts Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics 2018 Declaration I, Ellen Watts, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Ellen Watts September 17, 2018. 2 Abstract The ability of celebrities to become influential political actors is evident (Marsh et al., 2010; Street 2004; 2012, West and Orman, 2003; Wheeler, 2013); the process enabling this is not. While Driessens’ (2013) concept of celebrity capital provides a starting point, it remains unclear how celebrity capital is exchanged for political capital. Returning to Street’s (2004) argument that celebrities claim to speak for others provides an opportunity to address this. In this thesis I argue successful exchange is contingent on acceptance of such claims, and contribute an original model for understanding this process. I explore the implicit interconnections between Saward’s (2010) theory of representative claims, and Bourdieu’s (1991) work on political capital and the political field. On this basis, I argue celebrity capital has greater explanatory power in political contexts when fused with Saward’s theory of representative claims. Three qualitative case studies provide demonstrations of this process at work. Contributing to work on how celebrities are evaluated within political and cultural hierarchies (Inthorn and Street, 2011; Marshall, 2014; Mendick et al., 2018; Ribke, 2015; Skeggs and Wood, 2011), I ask which key factors influence this process.
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Wednesday Volume 501 25 November 2009 No. 5 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 25 November 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 513 25 NOVEMBER 2009 514 my hon. Friend the Member for North Ayrshire and House of Commons Arran (Ms Clark). In a letter I received from Ofcom, the regulator states: Wednesday 25 November 2009 “Ofcom does not have the power to mandate ISPs”— internet service providers. Surely that power is overdue, because otherwise, many of my constituents, along with The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock those of my colleagues, will continue to receive a poor broadband service. PRAYERS Mr. Murphy: My hon. Friend makes some very important points about the decision-making powers and architecture [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] that will ensure we achieve 90 per cent. broadband penetration. We are trying to ensure that the market provides most of that, and we expect that up to two thirds—60 to 70 per cent.—of homes will be able to Oral Answers to Questions access super-fast broadband through the market. However, the Government will have to do additional things, and my hon. Friend can make the case for giving Ofcom SCOTLAND additional powers; but, again, we are absolutely determined that no one be excluded for reasons of geography or income.
  • West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority

    West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority

    WEST YORKSHIRE FIRE AND RESCUE AUTHORITY MEETING TO BE HELD ON FRIDAY 16 DECEMBER 2011 AT 10.30 A.M. IN THE TRAINING AND CONFERENCE SUITE, BIRKENSHAW AGENDA 1. CHAIRMAN’S ANNOUNCEMENTS 2. ADMISSION OF THE PUBLIC The Committee is asked to consider whether, by resolution, to exclude the public from the meeting during the items of business marked with an ‘E’ reference, because of the possibility of the disclosure of exempt information. 3. URGENT ITEMS To determine whether there are any additional items of business which, by reason of special circumstances, the Chair believes should be considered at the meeting. 4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To consider any Declaration of Interest in relation to any item of business on the agenda. 5. MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING HELD ON 9 SEPTEMBER 2011 (pp 3 - 8) (Enclosed) 6. MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 30 SEPTEMBER 2011 (pp 9 - 11) (Enclosed) 7. MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 31 OCTOBER 2011 (pp 12 - 14) (Enclosed) 8. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY SAFETY COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 4 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 15 - 21) (Enclosed) 9. MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 11 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 22 - 24) (Enclosed) 10. MINUTES OF THE FINANCE AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 25 - 28) (Enclosed) 11. LOCAL GOVERNMENT GROUP MINUTES (pp 29 - 51) a) Fire Commission - 14 October 2011 (p 29) b) Safer and Stronger Communities Programme Board - 13 September 2011 (p 36) c) Fire Services Management Committee - 16 September 2011 (p 45) - 17 November 2011 (Enclosed where available) 12.
  • [Redacted S.38(1)(B)] Sent: 27 May 2020 08:59 To

    [Redacted S.38(1)(B)] Sent: 27 May 2020 08:59 To

    OFFICIAL: SENSITIVE 1 - ONE DOCUMENT From: [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] Sent: 27 May 2020 08:59 To: Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Local Government; Cabinet Secretary for Social Security and Older People Cc: DG Organisational Development & Operations; DG Education, Communities & Justice DG Economy Kerr S (Stephen) (Social Security Director) McVie A (Ann) MacDougall A (Audrey); Baron-Broadhurst L (Lisa); Byrne A (Alison) <[email protected]>; McClintock A (Andy); Social Security Scotland Chief Executive; Laing SG (Shirley); [Redacted s.38(1)(b)]; [Redacted s.38(1)(b)]; First Minister Covid Briefing Unit; [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] Campbell J (Jeanette) (Special Adviser); Cabinet Secretary for Economy, Fair Work and Culture ; Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills; [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] Subject: RE: OFFICIAL: SENSITIVE - Citizens Basic Income - update Hi [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] Thanks for your email. On the questions asked by Ms Campbell, we plan to submit advice on the final report from the Citizen’s Basic Income Steering Group in the next few days and I will cover her points in that note. I hope this is satisfactory. [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] I Head of the Reserved and Working Age Benefits Unit I Scottish Government I 1B (South) Victoria Quay Edinburgh EH6 6QQ [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] or Skype Do not work Fridays. Find out more about new social security powers, and sign up to our newsletter From: [Redacted s.38(1)(b)] On Behalf Of Cabinet Secretary for Communities and Local Government Sent: 26
  • Preventing Violent Extremism

    Preventing Violent Extremism

    House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee Preventing Violent Extremism Sixth Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 16 March 2010 HC 65 Published on 30 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £25.00 Communities and Local Government Committee The Communities and Local Government Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Communities and Local Government and its associated bodies. Current membership Dr Phyllis Starkey MP (Labour, Milton Keynes South West) (Chair) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Mr Clive Betts MP (Labour, Sheffield Attercliffe) John Cummings MP (Labour, Easington) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Mr Greg Hands MP (Conservative, Hammersmith and Fulham) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Alison Seabeck MP (Labour, Plymouth Davenport) Andy Slaughter MP (Labour, Islington South and Finsbury) Mr Neil Turner MP (Labour, Wigan) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/clgcom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Huw Yardley (Clerk of the Committee), Sarah Ioannou (Second Clerk), Josephine Willows (Inquiry Manager), Emma Gordon (Committee Specialist), Lorna Horton (Senior Committee Assistant), Nicola McCoy (Committee Assistant), Stewart McIlvenna (Committee Support Assistant), and Hannah Pearce (Select Committee Media Officer).
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era

    The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era

    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Wednesday Volume 494 24 June 2009 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 777 24 JUNE 2009 778 rightly made the case. I hope she will understand when I House of Commons point her to the work of the World Bank and other international financial institutions on infrastructure in Wednesday 24 June 2009 Ukraine and other countries. We will continue to watch the regional economic needs of Ukraine through our involvement with those institutions. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr. Gary Streeter (South-West Devon) (Con): Given PRAYERS the strategic significance of Ukraine as a political buffer zone between the EU and Russia, does the Minister not think that it was perhaps an error of judgment to close [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] the DFID programme in Ukraine last year? It would be an utter tragedy if Ukraine’s democracy should fail, so BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS should we not at the very least be running significant capacity-building programmes to support it? SPOLIATION ADVISORY PANEL Resolved, Mr. Thomas: We are running capacity-building programmes on democracy and good governance through That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
  • Unfinished Business the Quest for a Living Wage

    Unfinished Business the Quest for a Living Wage

    Unfinished Business The Quest for a Living Wage FAIR PLAY – FAIR PAY “We have to accept that inequality is a way of achieving greater opportunity and prosperity” Lord Griffiths – Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs “Let’s finally make the minimum wage a living wage. Let’s tie it to the cost of living so we don't have to wait another 10 years to see it rise.” President Barack Obama “Fair pay means motivated staff who stay working at Barclays longer. Improving people’s standard of living makes business sense.” Karen Pleva – Barclays Chief of Staff (Global Operations) Suite 11 Tulip House, 70 Borough High Street, London SE1 1XF FAIR PLAY – FAIR PAY www.fairpaynetwork.org Produced and written by Deborah Littman, Mark Donne and Barney Wakefield, with the kind support of Unfinished Business: The Quest for a Living Wage. page 3 Fair Pay Network Director Mark Donne Patrons Sian Berry Lord Best Jon Cruddas MP Baroness Helena Kennedy Guy Stallard, Director of International Services, KPMG Europe Polly Toynbee National Steering Committee Chair – Karen Buck MP Treasurer – Alison Garnham (Chief Executive, Child Poverty Action Group) Ben Whittaker (Vice-President Welfare, NUS) Moussa Haddad (Policy and Communications Manager, UK Poverty Programme, Oxfam) Kate Bell (Director of Policy, Gingerbread) Matthew Bolton (London Citizens) Stephen Burke (Chief Executive, Counsel and Care) Don Flynn (Director, Migrants Rights Network) Julie Gibson (UK Coalition against Poverty) Catherine Howarth (Director, Fair Pensions) Dr. Peter Kenway (Director, New Policy Institute) Clare Moody (Political Officer, Unite the Union) Deborah Littman (National Officer, UNISON) Jen McClelland (Appletree Trust) Dr. Catherine Rake (Director, Fawcett Society) Paul Sellers (Policy Officer, TUC) Lisa Johnson (UCU) Beth Lamont (Head of National & Equal Pay Unit, PCS) Steve Bell (Head of Policy, CWU) Alistair Gittins (National Policy Officer, RMT) page 4 Unfinished Business: The Quest for a Living Wage.
  • Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Havering Council

    Draft Recommendations on the New Electoral Arrangements for Havering Council

    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Havering Council Electoral review July 2020 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2020 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why Havering? 2 Our proposals for Havering 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2 Have your
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.

  • Lord-Pearsons-Letter-Of-Complaint-To

    COMPLAINT: COVERAGE BY “TODAY”, SINCE THE WILSON REPORT, OF THE CASE FOR THE UK TO WITHDRAW FROM THE EU. BACKGROUND The 2005 Wilson Report into the BBC’s coverage of EU affairs was the Corporation’s first published independent analysis of its output. Its committee of inquiry was chaired by Lord Wilson of Dinton, formerly Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service. This complaint is that the BBC has not delivered the improvements it promised in its response to that report, of its coverage of EU affairs. This applies particularly to the debate about the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. The Wilson Report was published in January 2005. It was critical of parts of the relevant output. It said: …we do think there is a serious problem. Although the BBC wishes to be impartial in its news coverage of the EU it is not succeeding. Whatever the intention, nobody thinks the outcome is impartial. There is strong disagreement about the net balance but all parties show remarkable unity in identifying the elements of the problem. Sometimes being attacked from all sides is a sign that an organisation is getting it right. That is not so here. It is a sign that the BBC is getting it wrong, and our main conclusion is that urgent action is required to put this right. The problem can be summarised under a number of headings which we analyse below.1 Institutional mindset. Giving the audience the information it needs to make up its own mind is a proper and important role for the BBC and one which it must carry out.