Clinical and Immunological Effects of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Coadministered with Interleukin 2: a Phase IB Study 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical and Immunological Effects of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Coadministered with Interleukin 2: a Phase IB Study 1 Vol. 2, 319-330, February 1996 Clinical Cancer Research 319 Clinical and Immunological Effects of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor Coadministered with Interleukin 2: A Phase IB Study 1 Joan H. Schiller, 2 Jacquelyn A. Hank, tivity and CD16 expression on monocytes and lymphocytes Masoud Khorsand, Barry Storer, and CD56 expression on lymphocytes were significantly lower in patients receiving GM-CSF simultaneously with Agnes Borchert, Karen Huseby-Moore, IL-2 than in patients receiving the sequential treatment. Dan Burns, Osvaldo Wesly, Antitumor activity was observed in the lungs of four of Mark R. Albertini, George Wilding, eight renal cell carcinoma patients with pulmonary metas- and Paul M. Sondel tases treated with concurrent GM-CSF and IL-2. Although University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments no or minimal shrinkage was observed in the patients' large of Human Oncology and Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin 53792 primary tumors, these results warrant further study. The recommended initial Phase II dose and schedule is 1.25 p~g/kg/day GM-CSF, given concurrently with 1.5 million ABSTRACT Roche units/m2/day (4.5 x 106 international units/m2/day) Interleukin 2 (IL-2) and granulocytes-macrophage col- IL-2, with subsequent escalation of GM-CSF to 2.5 Ixg/kg/ ony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are activators of the lym- day after careful observation for toxicities. phocyte and granulocyte/macrophage series, respectively. We conducted a phase IB trial to identify the maximally INTRODUCTION tolerated dose and to assess immunological effects of the The failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy to induce long- combination. Thirty-four patients with incurable cancers lasting remissions in the majority of solid tumors has prompted received 2.5, 5, or 10 Ixg/kg GM-CSF s.c. either before or investigation of new treatment modalities, including antitumor concurrently with 1.5 or 3.0 million units/m2/day IL-2. immunotherapies. The ability of various biological response The most common laboratory and clinical side effects modifiers, such as IL-23 and IFNs, to enhance cellular immunity included an elevation of the total WBC or eosinophil count suggests a potential therapeutic role for these agents in certain due to GM-CSF, and constitutional symptoms due to IL-2. neoplastic diseases, such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included hypotension, thrombocyto- (1-5). IL-2, a M r 15,000 protein produced by helper T cells penia, elevations in aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin, following activation by antigens or mitogens, can activate ef- renal toxicity, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, arrhythmia, and fector T-cell populations and NK cells to lyse tumor cells in constitutional symptoms. Two patients receiving 5.0 Ixg/kg vitro and in vivo and can augment ADCC in vitro when used in GM-CSF plus concurrent 3.0 million units IL-2 experienced combination with MoAbs (6-10). As a single agent, it can dose-limiting grade 3 or 4 neurological toxicity, which re- induce antitumor responses in 10-15% of patients with renal versed almost completely. cell carcinoma or metastatic melanoma (1-5, 11). Toxicities, An increase in the serum-soluble IL-2 c~ chain receptor however, are significant, thus promoting continued efforts at was observed with administration of GM-CSF, IL-2, or the identifying methods to enhance antitumor effects by increasing combination. IL-2 therapy enhanced lymphokine-activated the specificity of the immune-mediated tumor destruction while killer activity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and modifying treatment programs to reduce toxicity (2, 11). lymphocyte activation, with increased CD16 and CD56 ex- One possible method for enhancing antitumor effects in- pression. GM-CSF increased expression of human leukocyte cludes combining IL-2 with other immunotherapies. Although antigen DR on peripheral blood monocytes and decreased IL-2 has been combined with IFNs and certain MoAbs, such as surface expression of CD16 on circulating monocytes and the anti-CD3 MoAb, with limited success (12-16), IL-2 has not polymorphonuclear cells. Lymphokine-activated killer ac- been studied extensively in combination with CSFs. CSFs are a family of regulatory glycoproteins that were first identified because of their ability to stimulate precursor hematopoietic Received 7/26/95; revised 10/6/95; accepted 10/18/95. 1 This research was supported by NIH Grants and Contracts CA53441, CA05436, CA32685, CM87290, CA14520, CA13539, CM47669, 3 The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; NK, natural killer; ADCC, HL02143, and RR03186, and American Cancer Society Grant CH-237. antibody-dependentcellular cytotoxicity; MoAb, monoclonal antibody; J. H. S. and G. W. are also supported in part by the Veterans Admin- GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; M-CSF, istration. monocyte CSF; BRMP, Biological Response Modifiers Program; PBM, 2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of peripheral blood mononuclear; PMN, polymorphonuclear;E:T, effector: Medicine, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, K4/ target; LAK, lymphokine-activatedkiller; HLA, human leukocyte anti- 666 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI gen; IL-2R, IL-2 receptor; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; TNF, 53792. Phone: (608) 263-8600; Fax: (608) 263-8613. tumor necrosis factor. Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 23, 2021. © 1996 American Association for Cancer Research. 320 Phase IB Study of GM-CSF and IL-2 cells to form colonies of progenitor cells. However, it is now Table 1 Schema of treatment clear that they are not simply proliferative stimuli but can Dose of regulate the functional activity of mature hematopoietic cells No. of GM-CSF Dose of IL-2 (17). GM-CSF, for example, is necessary for cell survival in Sequence patients (lxg/kg/day) (million units/mZ/day) vitro of both progenitor and mature granulocytes and macro- Sequential, 6 5.0 3.0 phages and also can affect the activation, cell mobility, phago- GM-CSF ~ IL-2 6 10.0 3.0 cytic activity, and ADCC of these cells (17). The effects of Concurrent, 6 2.5 1.5 GM-CSF + IL-2 4 2.5 3.0 GM-CSF and M-CSF on neutrophils and monocytes may trans- 12 5.0 1.5 late into antitumor effects in vitro or in preclinical models (18-25). Clinically, treatment with GM-CSF or M-CSF can enhance monocyte activation and induce monocytosis (26-28). Patients with significant central nervous system disease, central Combining IL-2, a lymphocyte activator, with GM-CSF, nervous system metastases, or serious recent infections, or those an activator of the monocyte/macrophage and granulocyte lin- who required continued therapy with corticosteroids, aspirin, or eage, may be a reasonable approach to the treatment strategy of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents were ineligible. Patients activation of multiple effector cell populations. Therefore, we with histories of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were conducted a Phase IB trial of GM-CSF and IL-2 to determine required to have adequate ventilatory function (forced expira- the maximally tolerated dose, to identify toxicities, and to assess tory volume, ->60% of predicted). All patients underwent place- the immunological effects of the combination. ment of in-dwelling venous catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment Program Reagents Patients were scheduled to receive 2.5, 5, or 10 ~g/kg GM-CSF and either 1.5 or 3.0 × 10 6 units/m2/day IL-2 on a IL-2 and GM-CSF sequential or concurrent schedule (Table 1). Patients were en- Human recombinant IL-2 and GM-CSF for clinical treat- tered in groups of six to ensure adequate numbers for statistical ment and in vitro studies were provided by Hoffmann-LaRoche evaluation of the immunological studies. Patients without dose- Inc. (Nutley, NJ) and Immunex Corp. (Seattle, WA), respec- limiting toxicity or progressive disease in the first course were tively, through the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the eligible to receive a second course of treatment following a National Cancer Institute. IL-2 and GM-CSF are highly purified 2-week rest period. products produced in Escherichia coli and yeast expression Patients were registered sequentially to receive one of two vectors, respectively, using recombinant DNA techniques. IL-2 different treatment schedules (Table 1 and Fig. 1): GM-CSF for units are expressed in BRMP or Hoffmann-LaRoche units, and this 12 days followed by IL-2 (sequential treatment) or concurrently compares to the international standard (in which 1 BRMP unit = with IL-2 starting on day 8. -3 international units; Ref. 29). Thus, the 1.5 × 106-unit/m2/day Sequential GM-CSF Followed by IL-2. To assess the regimen used here with Hoffman-LaRoche IL-2 would correspond effects of GM-CSF and IL-2 individually, the first 12 patients to 4.5 × 106 international units/m2/day commercially available received GM-CSF followed by IL-2 (Fig. 1). GM-CSF was Aldesleukin (IL-2; Chiron, Inc., Emeryville, CA). given s.c. on days 1-12 or until hematological toxicity occurred, as defined below. Following a 3-day rest period, three consec- Clinical Protocol utive weekly 4-day continuous infusions of IL-2 commenced (days 15-18, 22-25, and 29-32). Patients GM-CSF Administered Concurrently with IL-2. To Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this Phase I trial determine the clinical and biological effects of a combination of (National Cancer Institute BRMP protocol B92-0001). All pa- IL-2 and GM-CSF, patients 13-34 received IL-2 as a 4-day tients had refractory cancers, for which other proven effective continuous infusion for 3 weeks (days 1-4, 8-11, and 15-18) treatments were not available, and all signed approved informed with GM-CSF starting the second week of IL-2 (day 8). Again, consent forms. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology GM-CSF was administered for 12 days (days 8-19) or until Group performance status of 0-1 (Karnofsky, 80-100) and a treatment-limiting toxicity occurred (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Cells, Tissues and Organs of the Immune System
    Immune Cells and Organs Bonnie Hylander, Ph.D. Aug 29, 2014 Dept of Immunology [email protected] Immune system Purpose/function? • First line of defense= epithelial integrity= skin, mucosal surfaces • Defense against pathogens – Inside cells= kill the infected cell (Viruses) – Systemic= kill- Bacteria, Fungi, Parasites • Two phases of response – Handle the acute infection, keep it from spreading – Prevent future infections We didn’t know…. • What triggers innate immunity- • What mediates communication between innate and adaptive immunity- Bruce A. Beutler Jules A. Hoffmann Ralph M. Steinman Jules A. Hoffmann Bruce A. Beutler Ralph M. Steinman 1996 (fruit flies) 1998 (mice) 1973 Discovered receptor proteins that can Discovered dendritic recognize bacteria and other microorganisms cells “the conductors of as they enter the body, and activate the first the immune system”. line of defense in the immune system, known DC’s activate T-cells as innate immunity. The Immune System “Although the lymphoid system consists of various separate tissues and organs, it functions as a single entity. This is mainly because its principal cellular constituents, lymphocytes, are intrinsically mobile and continuously recirculate in large number between the blood and the lymph by way of the secondary lymphoid tissues… where antigens and antigen-presenting cells are selectively localized.” -Masayuki, Nat Rev Immuno. May 2004 Not all who wander are lost….. Tolkien Lord of the Rings …..some are searching Overview of the Immune System Immune System • Cells – Innate response- several cell types – Adaptive (specific) response- lymphocytes • Organs – Primary where lymphocytes develop/mature – Secondary where mature lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells interact to initiate a specific immune response • Circulatory system- blood • Lymphatic system- lymph Cells= Leukocytes= white blood cells Plasma- with anticoagulant Granulocytes Serum- after coagulation 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Granulocyte Transfusions in Haematopoietic Cell Transplants and Leukaemia: the Phoenix Or Beating a Dead Horse?
    www.nature.com/bmt EDITORIAL Granulocyte transfusions in haematopoietic cell transplants and leukaemia: the phoenix or beating a dead horse? © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021 Bone Marrow Transplantation (2021) 56:2046–2049; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01399-3 You should make a point of trying every experience once, excepting incest and folk-dancing. (and perhaps granulocyte transfusions?) Sir Arnold Bax Why is it some things which are so intuitive and seem easily proved continue engendering controversy and debate (Fig. 1). The example at hand is granulocyte transfusions. It has been known for >50 years infection risk increases precipitously in people when their blood granulocyte concentration is <0.5 × 10E + 9/L [1, 2] (Fig. 2). Whether, given the development of more effective systemic and oral non-absorbable antibiotics and anti-fungal drugs, often given prophylactically 0.5 × 10E + 9/L remains the threshold for increased infection risk or whether the threshold is closer 0–0.2 × 10E + 9/L is unknown. It is also possible there is no blood granulocyte nadir requiring granulocyte transfusions or where a benefit of granulocyte transfusions can be convincingly proved. Regardless, the seemingly simple remedy to decreased Fig. 1 Centre for the Study of Rationality. Hebrew Univ. Jerusalem. blood granulocytes is to transfuse granulocytes from normals or, formally, from persons with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Amino™ (now renamed CelltrifugeTM)orbyfiltration leukapheresis Why should granulocyte transfusions be different than RBC and in persons with granulocytopenia and gram-negative sepsis. platelet transfusions which are convincingly safe and effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Immune System: How It Works
    Understanding the Immune System How It Works U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Cancer Institute Understanding the Immune System How It Works U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Cancer Institute NIH Publication No. 03-5423 September 2003 www.niaid.nih.gov www.nci.nih.gov Contents 1 Introduction 2 Self and Nonself 3 The Structure of the Immune System 7 Immune Cells and Their Products 19 Mounting an Immune Response 24 Immunity: Natural and Acquired 28 Disorders of the Immune System 34 Immunology and Transplants 36 Immunity and Cancer 39 The Immune System and the Nervous System 40 Frontiers in Immunology 45 Summary 47 Glossary Introduction he immune system is a network of Tcells, tissues*, and organs that work together to defend the body against attacks by “foreign” invaders. These are primarily microbes (germs)—tiny, infection-causing Bacteria: organisms such as bacteria, viruses, streptococci parasites, and fungi. Because the human body provides an ideal environment for many microbes, they try to break in. It is the immune system’s job to keep them out or, failing that, to seek out and destroy them. Virus: When the immune system hits the wrong herpes virus target or is crippled, however, it can unleash a torrent of diseases, including allergy, arthritis, or AIDS. The immune system is amazingly complex. It can recognize and remember millions of Parasite: different enemies, and it can produce schistosome secretions and cells to match up with and wipe out each one of them.
    [Show full text]
  • An EANM Procedural Guideline
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4052-x GUIDELINES Clinical indications, image acquisition and data interpretation for white blood cells and anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody scintigraphy: an EANM procedural guideline A. Signore1 & F. Jamar2 & O. Israel3 & J. Buscombe4 & J. Martin-Comin5 & E. Lazzeri6 Received: 27 April 2018 /Accepted: 6 May 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Introduction Radiolabelled autologous white blood cells (WBC) scintigraphy is being standardized all over the world to ensure high quality, specificity and reproducibility. Similarly, in many European countries radiolabelled anti-granulocyte antibodies (anti-G-mAb) are used instead of WBC with high diagnostic accuracy. The EANM Inflammation & Infection Committee is deeply involved in this process of standardization as a primary goal of the group. Aim The main aim of this guideline is to support and promote good clinical practice despite the complex environment of a national health care system with its ethical, economic and legal aspects that must also be taken into consideration. Method After the standardization of the WBC labelling procedure (already published), a group of experts from the EANM Infection & Inflammation Committee developed and validated these guidelines based on published evidences. Results Here we describe image acquisition protocols, image display procedures and image analyses as well as image interpre- tation criteria for the use of radiolabelled WBC and monoclonal antigranulocyte antibodies. Clinical application for WBC and anti-G-mAb scintigraphy is also described. Conclusions These guidelines should be applied by all nuclear medicine centers in favor of a highly reproducible standardized practice. Keywords Infection .
    [Show full text]
  • Granulocyte Serology: Current Concepts and Clinical Signifcance
    Review Granulocyte serology: current concepts and clinical signifcance M.E. Clay, R.M. Schuller, and G.J. Bachowski Applying serologic procedures to the detection of RBC and lym- Clinical Significance phocyte antigens has facilitated the identification of granulo- Alloimmune Neonatal Neutropenia cyte antigens with established clinical significance, which are Neutropenia observed in the neonate is primarily the now classified in the human neutrophil antigen system. Granu- result of neutrophil-specific alloantibodies transplacentally locyte alloantibodies and autoantibodies have been implicated transferred to the fetus from the maternal circulation. The in a variety of clinical conditions including alloimmune neutro- penia, autoimmune neutropenia, febrile and severe pulmonary presence of these human neutrophil antigen (HNA) anti- transfusion reactions, drug-induced neutropenia, refractori- bodies most likely is the result of prenatal maternal sensi- ness to granulocyte transfusions, and immune neutropenia tization by fetal neutrophils crossing the placental barrier, after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although the although the antibodies may have also arisen in association intrinsically fragile nature of granulocytes contributes to the in- with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus herent challenges of granulocyte serology, several advances in erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis.2,3 Mater- laboratory procedures have improved detection of granulocyte nal alloimmunization can occur anytime after the first antibodies. This
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrophils (A.K.A
    Neutrophils (a.k.a. leukocyte, granulocyte, white blood cell, WBC) blood cells on a microscope slide showing the lobed nucleus of two neutrophils a 3-d drawing of a neutrophil This chart shows how blood cells are produced in the bone marrow from “stem cells” and how we organize them into groups. By Mikael Häggström The Mul(faceted Func(ons of Neutrophils Tanya N. Mayadas,1 Xavier Cullere,1 and Clifford A. Lowell2 “Neutrophils and neutrophil-like cells are the major pathogen-fighKng immune cells in organisms ranging from slime molds to mammals. Central to their funcKon is their ability to be recruited to sites of infecKon, to recognize and phagocytose (eang foreign objects like bacteria) microbes, and then to kill pathogens through a combinaon of cytotoxic mechanisms.” Form • average diameter of 12-15 micrometers (µm) in peripheral blood smears • in suspension, neutrophils have an average diameter of 8.85 µm • mulK-lobed shape nucleus • survive for only 8–12 h in the circulaon and up to 1–2 days in Kssues • Neutrophils will show increasing segmentaon (many segments of nucleus) as they mature. A normal neutrophil should have 3-5 segments. • Neutrophils account for approximately 50-70% of all white blood cells (leukocytes) Func(on • first line of host defense against a wide range of infecKous pathogens including bacteria, fungi, and protozoa • Neutrophils are generated at a rate of 1011 per day, which can increase to 1012 per day during bacterial infection. • Researchers once believed that neutrophils were present only during the most acKve phase of an infecKon, funcKoning as pathogen killers.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood and Immunity
    Chapter Ten BLOOD AND IMMUNITY Chapter Contents 10 Pretest Clinical Aspects of Immunity Blood Chapter Review Immunity Case Studies Word Parts Pertaining to Blood and Immunity Crossword Puzzle Clinical Aspects of Blood Objectives After study of this chapter you should be able to: 1. Describe the composition of the blood plasma. 7. Identify and use roots pertaining to blood 2. Describe and give the functions of the three types of chemistry. blood cells. 8. List and describe the major disorders of the blood. 3. Label pictures of the blood cells. 9. List and describe the major disorders of the 4. Explain the basis of blood types. immune system. 5. Define immunity and list the possible sources of 10. Describe the major tests used to study blood. immunity. 11. Interpret abbreviations used in blood studies. 6. Identify and use roots and suffixes pertaining to the 12. Analyse several case studies involving the blood. blood and immunity. Pretest 1. The scientific name for red blood cells 5. Substances produced by immune cells that is . counteract microorganisms and other foreign 2. The scientific name for white blood cells materials are called . is . 6. A deficiency of hemoglobin results in the disorder 3. Platelets, or thrombocytes, are involved in called . 7. A neoplasm involving overgrowth of white blood 4. The white blood cells active in adaptive immunity cells is called . are the . 225 226 ♦ PART THREE / Body Systems Other 1% Proteins 8% Plasma 55% Water 91% Whole blood Leukocytes and platelets Formed 0.9% elements 45% Erythrocytes 10 99.1% Figure 10-1 Composition of whole blood.
    [Show full text]
  • I M M U N O L O G Y Core Notes
    II MM MM UU NN OO LL OO GG YY CCOORREE NNOOTTEESS MEDICAL IMMUNOLOGY 544 FALL 2011 Dr. George A. Gutman SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE (Copyright) 2011 Regents of the University of California TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 ANTIGEN/ANTIBODY INTERACTIONS ..............................................9 CHAPTER 3 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE I..................................................................17 CHAPTER 4 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE II.................................................................23 CHAPTER 5 COMPLEMENT...................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 6 ANTIBODY GENETICS, ISOTYPES, ALLOTYPES, IDIOTYPES.....45 CHAPTER 7 CELLULAR BASIS OF ANTIBODY DIVERSITY: CLONAL SELECTION..................................................................53 CHAPTER 8 GENETIC BASIS OF ANTIBODY DIVERSITY...................................61 CHAPTER 9 IMMUNOGLOBULIN BIOSYNTHESIS ...............................................69 CHAPTER 10 BLOOD GROUPS: ABO AND Rh .........................................................77 CHAPTER 11 CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND MHC ........................................83 CHAPTER 12 CELL INTERACTIONS IN CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY ..............91 CHAPTER 13 T-CELL/B-CELL COOPERATION IN HUMORAL IMMUNITY......105 CHAPTER 14 CELL SURFACE MARKERS OF T-CELLS, B-CELLS AND MACROPHAGES...............................................................111
    [Show full text]
  • Circular of Information for the Use of Human Blood and Blood Components
    CIRCULAR OF INFORMATION FOR THE USE OF HUMAN BLOOD Y AND BLOOD COMPONENTS This Circular was prepared jointly by AABB, the AmericanP Red Cross, America’s Blood Centers, and the Armed Ser- vices Blood Program. The Food and Drug Administration recognizes this Circular of Information as an acceptable extension of container labels. CO OT N O Federal Law prohibits dispensing the blood and blood compo- nents describedD in this circular without a prescription. THIS DOCUMENT IS POSTED AT THE REQUEST OF FDA TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC RECORD OF THE CONTENT IN THE OCTOBER 2017 CIRCULAR OF INFORMATION. THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED AS A REFERENCE AND PROVIDES: Y • GENERAL INFORMATION ON WHOLE BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENTS • INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE • SIDE EFFECTS AND HAZARDS P THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT SERVE AS AN EXTENSION OF LABELING REQUIRED BY FDA REGUALTIONS AT 21 CFR 606.122. REFER TO THE CIRCULAR OF INFORMATIONO WEB- PAGE AND THE DECEMBER 2O17 FDA GUIDANCE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON THE CIRCULAR. C T O N O D Table of Contents Notice to All Users . 1 General Information for Whole Blood and All Blood Components . 1 Donors . 1 Y Testing of Donor Blood . 2 Blood and Component Labeling . 3 Instructions for Use . 4 Side Effects and Hazards for Whole Blood and P All Blood Components . 5 Immunologic Complications, Immediate. 5 Immunologic Complications, Delayed. 7 Nonimmunologic Complications . 8 Fatal Transfusion Reactions. O. 11 Red Blood Cell Components . 11 Overview . 11 Components Available . 19 Plasma Components . 23 Overview . 23 Fresh Frozen Plasma . .C . 23 Plasma Frozen Within 24 Hours After Phlebotomy . 28 Components Available .
    [Show full text]
  • Ch33 WO Pt1.Pdf
    33 Innate Host Resistance 1 33.1 Innate Resistance Overview 1. Identify the major components of the mammalian host immune system 2. Integrate the major immune components and their functions to explain in general terms how the immune system protects the host 2 Host Resistance Overview • Most pathogens (disease causing microbes) – must overcome surface barriers and reach underlying – overcome resistance by host • nonspecific resistance • specific immune response 3 Host Resistance Overview… • Immune system – composed of widely distributed cells, tissues, and organs – recognizes foreign substances or microbes and acts to neutralize or destroy them • Immunity – ability of host to resist a particular disease or infection • Immunology – science concerned with immune responses 4 Immunity • Nonspecific immune response – Aka nonspecific resistance, innate, or natural immunity – acts as a first line of defense – offers resistance to any microbe or foreign material – lacks immunological memory • Specific immune response – Aka acquired, adaptive, or specific immunity – resistance to a particular foreign agent – has “memory” • effectiveness increases on repeated exposure to agent 5 6 Antigens • Recognized as foreign • Invoke immune responses – presence of antigen in body ultimately results in B cell activation production of antibodies • antibodies bind to specific antigens, inactivating or eliminating them • other immune cells also become activated • Name comes from antibody generators 7 White Blood Cells of Innate and Adaptive Immunity • White blood
    [Show full text]
  • Cells of the Immune System and Innate Immunity
    Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology HST.176: Cellular and Molecular Immunology Course Director: Dr. Shiv Pillai Cells of the Immune System and Innate Immunity Recommended reading: Abbas et al., 4th edition, Chapters 2 and 12 Janeway and Travers, 5th edition, Chapters 1 and 10 The innate immune system is made up of molecules and cellular processes that defend the host within minutes and hours after exposure to a noxious stimulus. It is the only immune system in plants and invertebrates. Innate immune responses may initiate acute inflammation, which basically involves the accumulation and activation of phagocytes (mainly polymorphonuclear cells in man) and of vascular endothelium at sites of injury. In vertebrates, the innate and adaptive immune systems talk to each other and there is an important reciprocal interplay that operates between these systems. In these animals the cells and molecules of the innate immune system provide immediate protection and then set in motion the activation of the adaptive immune response. The adaptive immune response in turn “revs” up innate immune mechanisms of host defense. The innate immune system uses non-clonal “pattern recognition” receptors (PRRs) which cannot recognize host structures but which do recognize patterns found on microbes.These are sometimes called PAMPs for Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns. Pathogens/ microbes The most common organisms that cause disease are viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and worms. A microbe (a small invader) or a worm that does not cause disease in most people may generally be classified as non-pathogenic. Such an organism will provoke an immune response in a normal immunocompetent host.
    [Show full text]
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)
    British Journal of Cancer (1999) 80(1/2), 229–235 © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Article no. bjoc.1998.0344 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) transiently suppresses mitogen-stimulated T-cell proliferative response E Reyes1, I García-Castro2, F Esquivel1, J Hornedo2, H Cortes-Funes2, J Solovera3 and M Alvarez-Mon1 1Medicine/Immune System Diseases Oncology Service, Department of Medicine ‘Principe de Asturias’ University Hospital, Alcalá University, Carretera Madrid- Barcelona, Km 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; 2Medical Oncology Department, ‘12 de Octubre’ University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 3Amgen, S.A. Barcelona, Spain Summary Granulocyte colony-stimulation factor (G-CSF) is a cytokine that selectively promotes growth and maturation of neutrophils and may modulate the cytokine response to inflammatory stimuli. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of G-CSF on ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) functions. Ten patients with breast cancer were included in a clinical trial in which r-metHuG-CSF was administrered daily for 5 days to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells. Ten healthy women were also included as controls. Our data show that G-CSF treatment induces an increase in peripheral blood leucocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts. We have found a modulation in the percentages of CD19+, CD45+CD14+, CD4+CD45RA+ and CD4+CD45RO+ cells in PBMC fractions during G-CSF treatment. We have also found a significant reduction in the proliferative response of PBMC to mitogenic stimulation that reverted 14 days after the fifth and the last dose of G-CSF. Furthermore, it was not associated with significant changes in the pattern of cytokine production.
    [Show full text]