February 2010

AUSTRALASIAN HUMOUR STUDIES NETWORK 2010 COLLOQUIUM "Risk-Taking and Transgression in Humour" WOMENS COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY Saturday 13th and Sunday 14th February 2010 PROGRAM CONTACT: REGISTRATION & ACCOMMODATION: Dr Jessica Milner Davis The Women’s College University of Sydney School of Letters, Art and Media Street Address: 15 Carillon Avenue University of Sydney Newtown NSW 2042 Email: [email protected] Tel: + 61 2 9517 5000 Fax: + 61 2 9517 5006 http://www.usyd.edu.au/humourstudies Email:[email protected] TIMETABLE SATURDAY 13 FEBRUARY 8.30 -- 9.00am Registration; Tea and Coffee (Garden Courtyard Arcade) All-day Plenary Session: THE LIBRARY 9.00 “Humour and the Workplace” Convenor: Dr Bruce Findlay, Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology 9.00 – 9.30 Ms George Major, Research Associate, Language in the Workplace Project, Victoria University of Wellington/Macquarie University Being (in)appropriate with workplace humour: Transgressing socio-cultural norms 9.30 – 10.00 Mrs Maren Rawlings, Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology Demographic differences in humour measurements: If it’s male, managed but not mature, is it work humour? 10.00 – 10.30 Dr Bruce Findlay, Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology Emotion-work, humour, and burnout 10.30 – 11.00 Mr Daryl Peebles, Management, University of Tasmania Humour - a possible component of “Psychological Capital”? 11.00 – 11.30 am Morning Refreshments 11.30 – 12.00 Assoc. Prof. Robert Phiddian, Humanities Research Centre, Prof. Ian Gibbins, Anatomy and Histology, Assoc. Prof. Haydon Manning, Politics, Flinders University Recognition, disgust and the effects of political satire 12.00 – 12.30 Dr Mark Rolfe, School of Social Sciences & International Studies Politicians and satirists and their wicked, wicked linguistic ways 12.30 – 1.30 pm Lunch 1.30 – 2.00 Prof. Michael Ewans, University of Newcastle and Assoc. Prof. Robert Phiddian, Flinders University Risk-taking and transgression: Aristophanes’ “Lysistrata” today. 2.00 – 2.30 Em.Prof. Conal Condren, History of European Discourses, University of Queensland Satire and Definition 2.30 – 3.00 pm Afternoon Tea 3.00 “Humour and the Law”, Convenor: Em. Prof. Conal Condren 3.00 – 3.30 Dr Laura E. Little, Law, Temple University/Visiting Fellow, University of Sydney Regulating funny: How American courts regulate humor in contract, sexual harassment, trademark, and defamation cases 3.30 – 4.00 Dr David Rolph, Law, University of Sydney Does defamation law have a sense of humour? 4.00 – 4.30 Dr Catherine Curtis, History, University of Sydney Keeping your head: Early modern political satire and the perils of parrhesia 4.30 – 5.00 Discussant/Convenor; General Discussion 5.00 – 5.45pm Pre-dinner Refreshments – Announcement of Dinner Arrangements TIMETABLE SUNDAY 14 FEBRUARY 8.30 – 9.00 am Registration; Tea and Coffee Morning Parallel Session A: THE LIBRARY 9.00 – 9.30 Ms Mira Crouch, Arts and Social Sciences, UNSW Embarrassingly funny, is it not? 9.30 – 10.00 Dr Paul Jewell, Philosophy, Flinders University The ethics of parody 10.00 – 10.30 Dr Hannah Burrows, Medieval Studies, University of Sydney A dead snake on a dead horse on an ice-floe: Form and function in Old Norse riddles 10.30 – 11.00 Morning Refreshments 11.0 0 – 11.30 Dr David Rawlings, Psychologist Sydney and Melbourne: Which is more afraid of being laughed at? 11.30 – 12.00 Mr Anton Crouch, Independent Scholar Black and blue: Violence as humour in vaudeville blues 12.00 – 12.30 Dr Peter Spitzer, Medical Director, The Humour Foundation Risk-taking in aged care: Exploring the SMILE study Morning Parallel Session B: FAIRFAX COMMON ROOM 9.00 – 10.00 Mr Forrest Wheeler, Exec. Director, “Clown Interactive Programs”, Oregon, USA (Work-shop) Putting humor to work: Examining humor from a “skill” perspective 10.00 – 10.30 Dr Jessica Milner Davis, Letters, Art & Media, University of Sydney Transgressing the boundaries: Humour relating to children 10.30 – 11.00 Morning Refreshments 11.0 0 – 11.30 Professor Carmen Moran, Humanities & Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University Psychological and physical transgression in cartoons 11.30 – 12.00 Ms Elisha McIntyre, Studies in Religion, University of Sydney Risking religion’s wrath: Satire, Sunstone Magazine and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 12.00 – 12.30 Discussion 12.30 – 1.30 pm Lunch Afternoon Plenary Session: THE LIBRARY 1.30 – 2.00 Mr Lindsay Foyle, Cartoonist/Cartoon Historian The ‘Five Bells’ Ripple Effect: How Australia Honors its Cartoonists 2.00 – 2.30 Dr Colin Dray, English, University of Sydney Harwood’s monsters: Mask, parody and the embodied subject 2.30 – 3.00 Afternoon Tea Closing Plenary Session: THE LIBRARY 3.00 – 4.00 Dr Susan Turnbull and Dr Felicity Collins, Media & Cinema Studies, La Trobe University Transgressing national types: Magda Szubanski and Chris Lilley 4.00 – 4.30 Dr Michael Lloyd, Social & Cultural Studies, Victoria University of Wellington Unnatural love, down under: ‘Flight of the Conchords’ tackle Australia 4.30 – 5.00 Discussion and Closing Business: presentation by Daryl Peebles, University of Tasmania, on plans for the February 2011 Colloquium 5.00 – 5.30 Departure Drinks 5.45 – 6.45 Meeting of AHSN Review Panel (Fairfax Common Room) AUSTRALASIAN HUMOUR STUDIES NETWORK 2010 COLLOQUIUM "Risk-Taking and Transgression in Humour" Saturday 13th and Sunday 14th February 2010 ABSTRACTS Dr Hannah Burrows, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Sydney E-mail: [email protected] A dead snake on a dead horse on an ice-floe: Form and function in Old Norse riddles In the medieval Icelandic saga Hervarar saga ok Heiðreks, Gestumblindi, who has fallen out of favour with the powerful king Heiðrekr, is given a choice: submit to the judgement of the king’s counsellors, or propound a riddle Heiðrekr cannot solve. Gestumblindi takes a risk: he chooses the riddling option. This allows for the presentation and preservation of 37 riddles – apart from a scant few other examples, the only Old Norse riddle-collection now extant. Among them are unusual poetic forms, tantalising mythological references, echoes of eddic texts, and creative depictions of everyday Scandinavian objects. Yet they have thus far been largely neglected in the scholarship. My paper will examine the form of the Old Norse riddles and the way they play with and transgress linguistic, semantic and genre boundaries, and what this can tell us both about medieval Scandinavian culture and about riddles as entertainment and learning. Em. Prof. Conal Condren FSSA FAHA, Centre for the History of European Discourses, University of Queensland E-mail: [email protected] Satire and Definition It is common to assume that definition is an essential process in dealing with complex intellectual phenomena, somehow standing beyond the definiendum (that needing to be defined); but definitions come in different forms, for different ends, and all carry with them attendant problems. This paper arises directly from an attempt with several others to produce a workable definition of satire for legal purposes and constitutes a set of further reflections illustrated principally with reference to defining Menippean satire. Mr Anton Crouch, Independent Scholar, formerly Geology, University of New South Wales E-mail [email protected] Black and blue: Violence as humour in vaudeville blues ABSTRACT: After briefly considering the 1929 Fats Waller/Andy Razaf song Black and blue, the paper will continue with a discussion of the African-American “husband and wife” duo vocal performances which contain violence presented in a humorous way. Performers to be heard will include Louis Armstrong & Lilian Hardin, and Joe & Susie Edwards (Butterbeans & Susie). This material, which is categorised as vaudeville blues, will be considered in the general context of violent farce and contrasted with the non-humorous violence of the classic solo blues (eg, in the recorded work of Ma Rainey and Bessie Smith). Further consideration will focus on Angela Davis’ distinction between real and representational violence in the blues, and the relevance of violence in the blues to contemporary black feminism will be raised. References Davis, A. Y., 1998. Blues legacies and black feminism. New York: Pantheon Books. West, C. M., (Ed), 2003. Violence in the lives of black women: battered, black, and blue. Binghamton: Haworth Press. Ms Mira Crouch, Adjunct Research Associate, Arts and Social Sciences, UNSW E-mail: [email protected] Embarrassingly funny, is it not? We know that we may laugh when embarrassed, be it in the form of a ‘nervous giggle’ or in an attempt to laugh off the embarrassing action. We also understand that embarrassment flows from transgressions, and that our laughter is meant to make light of the breach of social norms that makes us seem foolish or inept. More complicated is the case where we laugh at an embarrassing incident in which we are not involved. This, in turn, may be linked to our amusement at enacted comedy in which embarrassment plays a key part, as, eg, in Fawlty Towers. The obtuse Basil lurches from one perilous situation to the next, desperately trying to maintain his self-image while upsetting his customers and making a fool of himself before us, the audience. Blinded by his zeal to avoid embarrassment, he is perplexed and angry when his strategies fail. Here we are the ones who are embarrassed, and we laugh – though some of us cringe, too. Mirth and pain are closely interwoven, and this paper’s question is: what is it that gives rise to this emotional complex? I shall use one episode of Fawlty Towers as an example on the basis of which to consider this question. The starting point of the discussion is an analysis of embarrassment per se; the second part of the paper addresses the issue of comic embarrassment. The paper will draw on both sociological and psychoanalytic theories regarding humour and social interaction.

Load more