DOCSLIB.ORG

College Grove Bushland Level 2 Flora Survey Bunbury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
College Grove Bushland Level 2 Flora Survey Bunbury College Grove Bushland Level 2 Flora Survey Bunbury City of Bunbury i Disclaimer This document has been published by the City of Bunbury. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith and on the basis that the City of Bunbury, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Information pertaining to this document may be subject to change, and should be checked against any modifications or amendments subsequent to the document’s publication. Document Status Title: Level Two Fl ora Survey, College Grove Bushland , Bunbury Version Rev 0 Date: 5/05 /2015 Ammendments List Version Date Ammendments Prepared by Reviewed by REV O 5/05/2015 Final Report C. Spencer R. Smith , B. Deeley City of Bunbury Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Objectives ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Survey Area Location and General Description ............................................................................... 3 4. Regulatory Context .......................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) .......................... 5 4.2 Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) ............................................................................ 5 4.3 Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WC Act) .................................................................................. 6 4.4 Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 (BAM Act) ................................................ 6 5. Biophysical Context ......................................................................................................................... 7 5.1 Climate....................................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Landform and Soils .................................................................................................................... 7 5.3 Regional and local linkages........................................................................................................ 8 5.4 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................. 8 5.5 Vegetation Complexes............................................................................................................... 8 5.6 Priority and Threatened Ecological Communities ..................................................................... 9 5.7 Priority and Threatened Flora ................................................................................................. 10 5.8 Other significant vegetation and flora. ................................................................................... 11 5.9 Key habitat and flora requirements for threatened fauna species ......................................... 13 5.9.1 Western Ringtail Possum habitat and flora requirements ............................................... 13 5.9.2 Threatened Species of Black Cockatoos habitat and flora requirements ........................ 13 5.10 Range Extension Flora ........................................................................................................... 14 5.11 A restricted subspecies, variety or naturally occurring hybrid ............................................. 14 5.12 Declared Pest plants and Weeds of National Significance .................................................... 16 5.13 Locally Significant Weeds ...................................................................................................... 16 5.14 Previous Flora and Vegetation Surveys ................................................................................. 17 6. Survey Method .............................................................................................................................. 19 6.1 Desktop review: ....................................................................................................................... 19 6.2 Field survey .............................................................................................................................. 19 6.3 Comparative analysis of vegetation types .............................................................................. 20 7. Survey Limitations and Constraints ............................................................................................... 21 8. Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................. 22 8.1 General Flora ........................................................................................................................... 22 8.2 Threatened and Priority Flora ................................................................................................. 22 8.3 Possible Range Extent Flora .................................................................................................... 22 8.4 Weeds ...................................................................................................................................... 22 8.5 Vegetation Complex ................................................................................................................ 23 8.6 Vegetation Units: ..................................................................................................................... 23 8.7 Floristic Community Types ...................................................................................................... 29 8.8 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ................................................................... 31 City of Bunbury 8.9 Vegetation Condition .............................................................................................................. 31 8.10 Key vegetation and flora requirements for threatened species ........................................... 33 8.10.1 Western Ringtail Possums .............................................................................................. 33 8.10.2 Threatened Species of Black Cockatoos ......................................................................... 33 9. Conclusion and Recommendations ............................................................................................... 34 10. References ................................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix One – Definitions and Categories ........................................................................................ i Appendix Two – Vegetation Clearing Principles ................................................................................ vi Appendix Three – Flora Quadrat ....................................................................................................... vii Appendix Four – List of vascular flora identified across the survey area.......................................... xv Appendix Five – Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ............................................... xviii Appendix Six – Threatened and Priority Flora Database Search Results .......................................... xx Appendix Seven – Comparison of Flora Surveys ............................................................................ xxiii City of Bunbury Summary The City of Bunbury proposes to utilise Lots 298 and 997 Winthrop Avenue, Lot 938 Robertson Drive, Lot 934 Hildas Close, Lots 643 and 998 Somerville Drive and Lot 790 Oriel Court for urban development purposes. Most of this area is covered with native vegetation, which will need to be cleared to facilitate development. The City has prepared this Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey to support any future federal and / or state environmental impact assessment processes. The findings of the Level 2 Spring Flora and Vegetation Survey, conducted during September and October 2014, are summarised as follows: • No Declared Rare Flora Species listed under Section 23 F of the Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 or Priority flora species as listed by the Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) were found within the survey area. • No flora protected under the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) were recorded within the survey area. • Key flora species that may provide habitat for threatened species of black cockatoo protected under the EPBC Act were identified within the survey area. Key flora for the black cockatoos include: Jarrah ( Eucalyptus marginata ), Banksia attenuata and Woody Pear ( Xylomelum occidentale ). • Vegetation within the survey area may provide limited habitat for threatened Western Ringtail possums protected under the EPBC Act, for example via provision of denning or alternative foraging habitat. • The survey area is identified as occurring within the Karrakatta Complex
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey
    Shire of Dardanup Waterloo Urban and Industrial Expansion Flora and Fauna Survey March 2015 Executive summary This report is subject to, and must be read in conjunction with, the limitations set out in Section 1.4 and the assumptions and qualifications contained throughout the Report. The Greater Bunbury Strategy and Structure Plan identified a potential significant urban expansion area located to the east of the Eaton locality and an industrial expansion area in Waterloo, in the Shire of Dardanup. The Shire of Dardanup (the Shire) and the Department of Planning have commenced preparation of District Structure Plans (DSP) for the urban expansion area and the industrial expansion area. The DSP will be informed by several technical studies including flora and fauna surveys. The Shire has commissioned GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) to undertake a flora and fauna survey and reporting for the Project. The Project Area is situated in the locality of Waterloo in the Shire of Dardanup. The Project Area includes the urban development area to the north of the South- west Highway (SWH) and the industrial development area to the south of the SWH. GHD undertook a desktop assessment of the Project Area and a flora and fauna field assessment with the first phase conducted from 13 to 14 August, 2014 and the second phase conducted from 29 to 31 October 2014. The purpose of this assessment was to identify the parts of the Project Area that have high, moderate and low ecological values so that the Shire can develop the DSP in consideration of these ecological values. This assessment identified the biological features of the Project Area and the key results are as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Snow White and Rose Red: Studies on the Contrasting Evolutionary Trajectories of the Genera Leucanthemum Mill
    Snow White and Rose Red: Studies on the contrasting evolutionary trajectories of the genera Leucanthemum Mill. and Rhodanthemum B.H.Wilcox & al. (Compositae, Anthemideae) DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DES DOKTORGRADES DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (DR. RER. NAT.) DER FAKULTÄT FÜR BIOLOGIE UND VORKLINISCHE MEDIZIN DER UNIVERSITÄT REGENSBURG vorgelegt von Florian Wagner aus Burgstall (Mitwitz) Juli 2019 Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 12.07.2019 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Christoph Oberprieler Unterschrift: ……………………………....... Florian Wagner iv Abstract Plant systematics, the study of taxonomy, phylogeny and evolutionary processes in plants has undergone considerable progress in the last decades. The application of modern molecular approaches and DNA-sequencing techniques in the field has led to an improved inventory of biodiversity and a better understanding of evolutionary processes shaping the biological diversity on our planet. The increased availability of molecular and genomic data has particularly facilitated the investigation of shallowly diverged and taxonomically complex taxon-groups, which is challenging due to minor morphological differences, low genetic differentiation and/or hybridization among taxa. The present thesis investigates species delimitation, hybridization and polyploidization in the recently diverged genera Leucanthemum Mill. and Rhodanthemum B.H. Wilcox & al. of the subtribe Leucantheminae K.Bremer & Humphries (Compositae, Anthemideae) by applying Sanger-, 454-pyro-, and restriction site associated
    [Show full text]
  • Anthemideae Christoph Oberprieler, Sven Himmelreich, Mari Källersjö, Joan Vallès, Linda E
    Chapter38 Anthemideae Christoph Oberprieler, Sven Himmelreich, Mari Källersjö, Joan Vallès, Linda E. Watson and Robert Vogt HISTORICAL OVERVIEW The circumscription of Anthemideae remained relatively unchanged since the early artifi cial classifi cation systems According to the most recent generic conspectus of Com- of Lessing (1832), Hoff mann (1890–1894), and Bentham pos itae tribe Anthemideae (Oberprieler et al. 2007a), the (1873), and also in more recent ones (e.g., Reitbrecht 1974; tribe consists of 111 genera and ca. 1800 species. The Heywood and Humphries 1977; Bremer and Humphries main concentrations of members of Anthemideae are in 1993), with Cotula and Ursinia being included in the tribe Central Asia, the Mediterranean region, and southern despite extensive debate (Bentham 1873; Robinson and Africa. Members of the tribe are well known as aromatic Brettell 1973; Heywood and Humphries 1977; Jeff rey plants, and some are utilized for their pharmaceutical 1978; Gadek et al. 1989; Bruhl and Quinn 1990, 1991; and/or pesticidal value (Fig. 38.1). Bremer and Humphries 1993; Kim and Jansen 1995). The tribe Anthemideae was fi rst described by Cassini Subtribal classifi cation, however, has created considerable (1819: 192) as his eleventh tribe of Compositae. In a diffi culties throughout the taxonomic history of the tribe. later publication (Cassini 1823) he divided the tribe into Owing to the artifi ciality of a subtribal classifi cation based two major groups: “Anthémidées-Chrysanthémées” and on the presence vs. absence of paleae, numerous attempts “An thé midées-Prototypes”, based on the absence vs. have been made to develop a more satisfactory taxonomy presence of paleae (receptacular scales).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chrysanthemum , Ajania and Its Allies (Anthemideae, Asteraceae) As Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal ITS and Chloroplast Trn LF IGS Sequences
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/248021556 Molecular phylogeny of Chrysanthemum , Ajania and its allies (Anthemideae, Asteraceae) as inferred from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast trn LF IGS sequences ARTICLE in PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION · FEBRUARY 2010 Impact Factor: 1.42 · DOI: 10.1007/s00606-009-0242-0 CITATIONS READS 25 117 5 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Hongbo Zhao Sumei Chen Zhejiang A&F University Nanjing Agricultural University 15 PUBLICATIONS 56 CITATIONS 97 PUBLICATIONS 829 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Hongbo Zhao letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 02 December 2015 Plant Syst Evol (2010) 284:153–169 DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0242-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Molecular phylogeny of Chrysanthemum, Ajania and its allies (Anthemideae, Asteraceae) as inferred from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast trnL-F IGS sequences Hong-Bo Zhao • Fa-Di Chen • Su-Mei Chen • Guo-Sheng Wu • Wei-Ming Guo Received: 14 April 2009 / Accepted: 25 October 2009 / Published online: 4 December 2009 Ó Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract To better understand the evolutionary history, positions of some ambiguous taxa were renewedly con- intergeneric relationships and circumscription of Chry- sidered. Subtribe Artemisiinae was chiefly divided into two santhemum and Ajania and the taxonomic position of groups, (1) one corresponding to Chrysanthemum, Arc- some small Asian genera (Anthemideae, Asteraceae), the tanthemum, Ajania, Opisthopappus and Elachanthemum sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed (the Chrysanthemum group), (2) another to Artemisia, spacer (nrDNA ITS) and the chloroplast trnL-F intergenic Crossostephium, Neopallasia and Sphaeromeria (the spacer (cpDNA IGS) were newly obtained for 48 taxa and Artemisia group).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 0.9.06 Stage-6 40 0.1.1 Publication data 3 0.9.07 Stage-7 40 0.1.2 Table of Contents 13 0.9.08 Stage-8 40 0.1.3 Word of thanks 14 0.9.09 Stage-9 41 0.1.4 Foreword Klein 14 0.9.10 Stage-10 41 0.1.5 Foreword Kuiper 15 0.9.11 Stage-11 41 0.1.6 Introduction 16 0.9.12 Stage-12 42 0.1.7 Introduction use 16 0.9.13 Stage-13 42 0.1.8 Use 17 0.9.14 Stage-14 42 0.2 Goal 18 0.9.15 Stage-15 43 0.3.1 Method 19 0.9.16 Stage-16 43 0.3.2 Element Theory 19 0.9.17 Stage-17 43 0.3.3 Classification of Plants 20 0.9.18 Stage-18 44 0.3.4 Classes 20 000.00 Evolution 44 0.4 Result 21 000.00.00 Kingdom 45 0.4.0 Result 21 000.00.00 Plant Kingdom 47 0.4.1 Phyla and Series 21 000.00.20 Kingdom 49 0.4.2 Classes and Series 22 111.00.00 Archaeoplastidae 51 0.4.3 Subclasses and Series 22 111.02.20 Fucus vesiculosus 51 0.4.4 Orders and Phases 23 111.10.00 Rhodophyta 51 0.4.5 Families and Subphases 23 111.10.13 Helminthochortos 51 0.4.7 Number 23 111.10.20 Chondrus crispus 51 0.5 Discussion 24 111.10.20 Porphyra yezoensis 51 0.5.0 Discussion 24 112.20.00 Glaucophyta 51 0.5.1 Discussion Apg 3 24 210.00.00 Chlorophyta 51 0.5.1 Discussion Apg 3 24 210.01.01 Cladophora rupestris 51 0.5.2 Divergence with Apg3 25 211.00.00 Viridiplantae 53 0.5.3 Discussion Phases 25 220.00.00 Charophyta 54 0.5.4 Discussion Sources 25 221.21.00 Characeae 54 0.5.5 Provings 26 221.21.04 Chara intermedia 55 0.5.6 Discussion Cases 26 300.00.00 Bryophyta 56 0.5.7 Discussion Complexity 27 311.10.00 Anthocerotophyta 57 0.6.1 Presentation 28 322.10.00 Marchantiophyta 57 0.6.2 Central
    [Show full text]
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey
    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment.Pdf
    Waitsia-03 – Flowline Corridor Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment AWE LIMITED MARCH 2018 TEL. (08) 9315 4688 [email protected] PO Box 50, Applecross WA 6953 www.woodmanenv.com.au AWE Limited Waitsia-03 – Pipeline Corridor Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment Waitsia-03 – Flowline Corridor Flora, Vegetation and Fauna Assessment Prepared for: AWE Limited Job Number: AWE17-38 Report Number: AWE17-38-01 Cover Photograph: VT1 (Quadrat W3-29) within the Waitsia-03 Study Area (Photograph: Woodman Environmental) DOCUMENT REVISION AND STATUS Revision Status Originator Internal Internal Client Client Reviewer Review Reviewer Review Date Date A Draft report AS/BL CG 26/2/2018 AW/MH 6/3/2018 B Draft report incorporating BL CG 8/3/2018 AW/MH 14/3/2018 client comments C Draft report incorporating BL KK 20/3/2018 AW 20/3/2018 client comments 0 Final Report BL DISCLAIMER This document is prepared in accordance with and subject to an agreement between Woodman Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd (“Woodman Environmental”) and the client for whom it has been prepared (“AWE Limited”) and is restricted to those issues that have been raised by the Client in its engagement of Woodman Environmental and prepared using the standard of skill and care ordinarily exercised by Environmental Scientists in the preparation of such Documents. Any organisation or person that relies on or uses this document for purposes or reasons other than those agreed by Woodman Environmental and the Client without first obtaining the prior written consent of Woodman Environmental, does so entirely at their own risk and Woodman Environmental denies all liability in tort, contract or otherwise for any loss, damage or injury of any kind whatsoever (whether in negligence or otherwise) that may be suffered as a consequence of relying on this document for any purpose other than that agreed with the Client.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naturalized Vascular Plants of Western Australia 1
    12 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.19(1) 2004 Distribution in IBRA Regions Western Australia is divided into 26 The naturalized vascular plants of Western Australia natural regions (Figure 1) that are used for 1: Checklist, environmental weeds and distribution in bioregional planning. Weeds are unevenly distributed in these regions, generally IBRA regions those with the greatest amount of land disturbance and population have the high- Greg Keighery and Vanda Longman, Department of Conservation and Land est number of weeds (Table 4). For exam- Management, WA Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western ple in the tropical Kimberley, VB, which Australia 6946, Australia. contains the Ord irrigation area, the major cropping area, has the greatest number of weeds. However, the ‘weediest regions’ are the Swan Coastal Plain (801) and the Abstract naturalized, but are no longer considered adjacent Jarrah Forest (705) which contain There are 1233 naturalized vascular plant naturalized and those taxa recorded as the capital Perth, several other large towns taxa recorded for Western Australia, com- garden escapes. and most of the intensive horticulture of posed of 12 Ferns, 15 Gymnosperms, 345 A second paper will rank the impor- the State. Monocotyledons and 861 Dicotyledons. tance of environmental weeds in each Most of the desert has low numbers of Of these, 677 taxa (55%) are environmen- IBRA region. weeds, ranging from five recorded for the tal weeds, recorded from natural bush- Gibson Desert to 135 for the Carnarvon land areas. Another 94 taxa are listed as Results (containing the horticultural centre of semi-naturalized garden escapes. Most Total naturalized flora Carnarvon).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Radiation Patterns and Evolution of Life-History Traits in Ursinia (Anthemideae, Asteraceae)
    Molecular Phylogeny, Radiation Patterns and Evolution of Life-History Traits in Ursinia (Anthemideae, Asteraceae) by Nonkululeko Swelankomo A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Stellenbosch University Department of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Supervisor: Prof. Ladislav Mucina Co-supervisor: Prof. Dirk U. Bellstedt December 2008 2 Declaration By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the owner of the copyright thereof (unless to the extent explicitly stated otherwise) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: Desember, 2008 Copyright © 2008 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved 3 Abstract Sequence data from the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA were used to study the phylogenetic relationships in the genus Ursinia Gaertn. (Asteraceae, Anthemideae) in the southern African region. Closely related genera, i.e. Cotula L., Osteospermum L. and Agoseris Raf., were used as outgroups. The study also included maximum parsimony and principal component analyses. The taxa within the genus Ursinia had previously been classified into two subgenera, Ursinia and Sphenogyne R.Br., mainly on the basis of distinct cypsela characters. The maximum parsimony, principal component and the phylogenetic analyses revealed two subgenera, corresponding to the existing subgeneric classification. Principal component analysis shows that the pappus, the number of pappus bristles and the colour of the cypsela are the most informative characters. However, the low number of phylogenetically informative characters of the ITS sequences, the poor resolution in the consensus tree, and low branch support values indicate that the ITS data contain weak phylogenetic signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Surveys (Level 2)
    Phase 1 and 2 Seasonal Fauna Surveys (Level 2) Yoongarillup Mineral Sands Project Doral Mineral Sands Pty Ltd AUGUST 2014 Report Number: SF 008335 VERSION 5 On behalf of: Doral Mineral Sands Pty Ltd Lot 7 Harris Road PICTON WA 6229 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist A.B.N. 95 536 627 336 PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] YOONGARILLUP MINERAL SANDS PROJECT – SEASONAL FAUNA SURVEYS – AUGUST 2014 – V5 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .........................................................................................................III 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................1 1.2 SURVEY SCOPE ....................................................................................1 1.3 BIOGEOGRAPHIC SETTING .................................................................2 1.4 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...................................................................3 1.4.1 Climate ......................................................................................................3 1.4.2 Topography and Soils ...............................................................................4 1.4.3 Surface Hydrology.....................................................................................4 2. METHODS....................................................................................................5 2.1 FAUNA HABITAT ASSESSMENT
    [Show full text]
  • IS20015 AC.Pdf
    Invertebrate Systematics, 2021, 35, 90–131 © CSIRO 2021 doi:10.1071/IS20015_AC Supplementary material Determining the position of Diomocoris, Micromimetus and Taylorilygus in the Lygus-complex based on molecular data and first records of Diomocoris and Micromimetus from Australia, including four new species (Insecta : Hemiptera : Miridae : Mirinae) Anna A. NamyatovaA,B,E, Michael D. SchwartzC and Gerasimos CassisD AAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo Highway, 3, Pushkin, RU-196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia. BZoologial Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Embankment, 1, RU-199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia. CAgriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada. DEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 46 Fig. S1. RAxML tree for the dataset with 124 taxa. Page 2 of 46 Fig. S2. RAxML tree for the dataset with 108 taxa. Page 3 of 46 Fig. S3. RAxML tree for the dataset with 105 taxa. Page 4 of 46 Full data on the specimens examined Diomocoris nebulosus (Poppius, 1914) AUSTRALIA: Australian Capital Territory: Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, 25 km SW of Canberra, 35.46414°S 148.9083°E, 770 m, 11 Feb 1984, W. Middlekauff, Bursaria sp. (Pittosporaceae), 1♀ (AMNH_PBI 00242761) (CAS). New South Wales: 0.5 km SE of Lansdowne, 33.89949°S 150.97578°E, 12 Nov 1990, G. Williams, Acmena smithii (Poir.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (Myrtaceae), 1♂ (UNSW_ENT 00044752), 1♀ (UNSW_ENT 00044753) (AM). 1 km W of Sth Durras Northead Road, 35.66584°S 150.25846°E, 05 Oct 1985, G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation and Flora of the Goss Ave Bushland
    THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE GOSS AVE BUSHLAND Andrew Thompson (left), Warwick Boardman (right) and a City of South Perth representative (centre) at the presentation of the 1996 Wildflower Society Bushland Plant Survey of the Flora of Goss Ave Bushland in the Bushland. This report is dedicated to the late Andrew Thompson for many years an active bushland regenerator, especially in the Goss Ave Bushland and Brixton Street Bushland as well as a member of the Society Bushland Plant Survey Program. Photo Brian Moyle, April 1998. A report for the City of South Perth prepared by Bronwen and Greg Keighery and the Wildflower Society Bushland Plant Survey Group. The Wildflower Society Bushland Plant Survey Program is a joint program with the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Volunteer Program. September 2020 CONTENTS 1 1 Background 2 2 Methods, Terminology and Definition 2 3 Geology, Landforms and Soils 3 4 Vegetation 3 Vegetation Complex Mapping 3 Vegetation Map 3 5 Flora 5 Total Flora 5 Significant Flora 6 Local species and forms of local species 6 6 Weeds 7 7 Conservation 7 Conservation Value 7 Management for Conservation 7 8 Acnowledgements 7 9 Bibliography 8 10 Figures 9 11 Appendix 1: Vegetation and Flora Codes 10 Table 1: Vegetation structure 10 Table 2: Vegetation condition scale (BJ Keighery 1994). 11 Table 3: State categories used to define the conservation status of flora taxa 11 Table 4: Western Australian Ecological Community Conservation Codes 12 12 Appendix 2: Goss Ave Bushland Native Vascular Plants 13 13 Appendix 3: Goss Ave Bushland Quadrat Data 20 14 Appendix 4: Goss Ave Bushland Weeds (Naturalized Vascular Plants) 24 15 Appendix 5: Goss Ave Bushland Photos 27 16 Appendix 6: Goss Ave Bushland Photos 28 2 1 BACKGROUND The vegetation and flora of the Swan Coastal Plain has been the subject of a series of studies, reports and publications.
    [Show full text]