Warheads $13 $51 Navigation & Control $49 $29 Seekers

Air Armament Symposia Munitions

5 Oct 2005 AAC/PA 09-28-05-376

Col Arnie Bunch Director Munitions Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory

oneAFRL Research Sites

ROME HANSCOM

INFORMATION Space Vehicles

Sensors Sensors EDWARDS

Propulsion AFOSR

WRIGHT-PATT KIRTLAND AIR VEHICLES SPACE VEHICLES BROOKS MATERIALS & MFG DIRECTED ENERGY Human Effectiveness EGLIN PROPULSION SENSORS MUNITIONS MESA HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS

Human Effectiveness TYNDALL Information Materials & Mfg

3 MN MISSION: Lead the discovery, GBU-28 “Bunker Buster” development, integration and transition of affordable Powered Standoff Weapon AGM-130 munitions technologies for our air and space force

Laser Guided Munitions

Advance Unitary Penetrator (AUP)

Powered Low Cost Autonomous Hard Target Smart Fuze (HTSF) Attack System (PLOCAAS)

AMRAAM

Small Smart Bomb (SSB) Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-Off Missile (Jassm) Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Munitions Directorate Organization

Executive Officer Director Associate Director Deputy Director Chief Scientist Capt Rod Bass Col Arnold Bunch Dr. John Pletcher, Jr. Mr. George Mooney Dr Bob Sierakowski s Directorate n o

Adv Guidance Division Ordnance Division Assess & Demo Division niti Product Divisions

Ms Sandra Lefstad Mr Scott Teel Col Chuck Wolfe Mu

Financial Contracting Corp Development Int & Ops Division / CIO Senior IMA Mr Paul Higgins Maj Wayne Register Ms Mary Perry Mr. Dale Palmer Col Mark Koch 5 FY05 AF S&T Budget

BY BY BUDGET ACTIVITY DIRECTORATE / TECH AREAS Dual Use Basic Sensors $5M (<1%) Research $196M (11%) $254M (14%) Air Vehicles Munitions 6.3 $125M (7%) $80M (4%) $657M 6.1 36% Information $254M $129M (7%) 14% Propulsion $300M (17%) Directed 6.2 Energy $904M $188M (10%) 50% Human Effectiveness Space Vehicles $120M (7%) Materials $211M (12%) & Mfg $208M (11%) TOTAL: 1.815B Numbers May Not Add Due to Rounding 6 AFRL/MN Budget Totals FY 04-05

FY04 FY05

Customer Appropriated Appropriated $65M Customer S&T S&T $78M $80M $88M

$153 Million $158 Million 7 Current MN Investments in the Industrial Base

FY02-05 OBLIGATED $

$33M Major Defense Contractors

$76M $127M Other Large Business

SBIR/STTR

Other Small Business $78M $93M Universities

TOTAL CURRENT INVESTMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL BASE $ 407M

8 MN Investments in the Industrial Base (Future)

6.2 Funding ($M) 6.3 Funding ($M) Assessments

$3 Explosives $91 $84 $27 Fuzes

$58 Warheads $13 $51 Navigation & Control $49 $29 Seekers

$50 $31 Signal & Imaging $49 $22 $10 Processing/Algorithms Munition Integration

$567M FUTURE INVESTMENT FY05-11 GROWS CORE COMPETENCY TECH BASE & ENABLES FUTURE DEMONSTRATIONS

9 Munitions Directorate Role in Acquisition Process

Navy Army AF

Joint Vision ACC

AFSOC

AF AFSPC Vision JV2020 NWV AF2025 Panels

MAPs Integrating AAC CRRA Concepts Task Forces AF Labs Industry Academia

Integrated Technology Program Time Phased Technology Tech Analysis & Goals Trade Offs Weapon Attributes / CONOPS vs Technologies

10 MN Capability Based Technology Visions

BattlespaceBattlespace AirAir SupremacySupremacy AccessAccess LRSLRS

RevolutionaryRevolutionary UrbanUrban OOpps/CASs/CAS TechnologiesTechnologies AreaArea Facility DominanceDominance CounterCounter CBRNECBRNE Facility NeutralizationNeutralization IrregularIrregular && CatastrophicCatastrophic ThreatThreat NeutralizationNeutralization 11 Irregular & Catastrophic Threat Neutralization Vision n eapo at W pon Defe Wea 3I gent nce AD P A mina rashP I T Do P C er P3 WO m STO redd s G Ter D Sh piral Far s ashPA AM S 25 yr Cr er ATC P3I 16 – redd B TOP Sh TNET ardS tes /SOF H ttribu TCAM rm A BA STOP id Te • Neutralize CBRNE Targets ard b M 5 yrs H Bom 6 – 1 • Effective Against All Agent 500lb LCD Types Term Near • Defeat/Destroy CBRNE Targets • Post Impact Verification Of yrs 0 –5 • Minimum Target Based Neutralization Collateral Effects • Model VV&A • Disrupt/Degrade CBRNE Targets • Alternate Fills/Payloads • Total Defeat Of GWOT Target War fighting Capability • Soft/Hardened/Mobile • Bio/Chem Decomposition • Total Local Area Dominance • Limited-Target Based • Less Damaging Delivery • Air Delivered Tracking With Collateral Effects System • 1st Principle Predictive Model Selective Lethal Options • Engineering Predictive Models • GWOT Target Neutralization • No Collateral Effects • F2T2EA Of GWOT Targets • Precise Delivery • Immediate Response Time • Accurate Delivery • Minimum Weapon Based • Limited-Weapon Based Collateral Effects Eliminate Irregular, Collateral Effects • Embedded Local Area Eliminate Irregular, Catastrophic & Disruptive • Miniaturized Local Area Dominance Catastrophic & Disruptive Threats While Minimizing Delivery • Rapid Response Time Threats While Minimizing • Real Time Targeting CollateralCollateral DamagDamagee • Quick Response Time Irregular & Catastrophic Threat Neutralization Vision n eapo at W pon Defe Wea 3I gent nce AD P A mina rashP I T Do P C er P3 WO m STO redd s G Ter D Sh piral Far s ashPA AM S 25 yr Cr er ATC P3I 16 – redd B TOP Sh TNET ardS tes /SOF H ttribu TCAM rm A BA STOP id Te • Neutralize CBRNE Targets ard b M 5 yrs H Bom 6 – 1 • Effective Against All Agent 500lb LCD Types Term Near • Defeat/Destroy CBRNE Targets • Post Impact Verification Of yrs 0 –5 • Minimum YTargetears Based to Neutralization Collateral SEffectsystem • Model VV&A • Disrupt/Degrade CBRNE Targets • Alternate Fills/Payloads t • Total Defeat Of GWOT Target War Developmen fighting Capability • Soft/Hardened/Mobile • Bio/Chem Decomposition & • Total Local Area Dominance • Limited-Target Based • Less Damaging Delivery Demonstration • Air Delivered Tracking With Collateral Effects System • 1st Principle( PredictiveSDD) Model Selective Lethal Options • Engineering Predictive Models • GWOT Target Neutralization • No Collateral Effects • F2T2EA Of GWOT Targets Initiation • Precise Delivery • Immediate Response Time • Accurate Delivery • Minimum Weapon Based • Limited-Weapon Based Collateral Effects Eliminate Irregular, Collateral Effects • Embedded Local Area Eliminate Irregular, Catastrophic & Disruptive • Miniaturized Local Area Dominance Catastrophic & Disruptive Threats While Minimizing Delivery • Rapid Response Time Threats While Minimizing • Real Time Targeting CollateralCollateral DamagDamagee • Quick Response Time 13 Shredder

• Sled Test Video – Date: 23 June 2005 – Purpose: demonstrate the survivability of the Shredder design and the ability to function correctly. The test was conducted against a 4 foot thick, reinforced concrete target, at > 1000 ft/s.

• Arena Test Video – Date: 27 July 2005 – Purpose: Collect fragmentation data to be used in the agent defeat modeling codes to better model the effectiveness of the Shredder warhead

14 WMD Counterforce Technologies

Enabling Technology

Real Agent BL-3 Predictive Diagnostic Thermobaric AD Taggants Labs Models Development Payloads

Weapon

GSI Concepts -033

PAW CrashPAD Shredder IM Shredder Agent Denial Weapon High Speed Weapon Payload

Test Beds & Other Capabilities WPMBAD Arena Testing Chem/Bio Bio Plume Baseline Denial Production Test Bed Comparisons Test-Beds 15 AFRL/MNAV Major Counter-CBRNE Activities FY05

• Supported ACC/DRMA in writing Capabilities Decision Document (CDD) for an Agent Defeat Weapon, Apr-Jun 05 • Primary S&T support for AFMC/EN I-Summit activities, direct participation and with AAC/XR, APR-Present • AFMC-DTRA Strategic Corporate Board Meeting, May 05, Kirtland AFB...AAC/EN-AAC/XR-AFRL/MN-DTRA/TDS, Munitions Steering Group SES, O-6 Meeting, Eglin AFB Apr 05. Similar meetings held in Oct and Dec 04 respectively. • AFRL-USSTRATCOM Technology Focus Days, Combating WMD, Jul 05 • AFRL/MN Counterforce Munitions brief to Dr. Barna, Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts, Apr 05 • Co-Chair for the Test, Technology, and Demonstration Working Group for the Agent Defeat Initiative sponsored by Dr. Klein, ASD for NBC and Dr. Sega DDR&E

16 Urban OPs

2 sizes

HardSTOP Small Attack Weapon Micro Air Vehicles

TMD Low Collateral Dominator Resupply Damage Warhead Vehicle

17 Facility Neutralization Vision

es roach l App Nove erm Far T HTIF apon yrs* t We – 25 OP Defea 16 M onal utes B uncti ttrib MOA apon F rm A t We id Te * • Innovative Techniques to Exploit Defea tor M yrs nnel netra – 15 Target Vulnerabilities Tu ed Pe 6 gh Spe • Deep Digger Hi Term Near • Address Soft, Hardened, Urban, • Micro Robotics yrs* 0 – 5 Deep & Transportable Facilities • Creative Approaches • Hard & Deeply Buried • Eliminate Target Warfighting • Defeat Difficult Facilities • Hyper Velocity Impact Capability Through Destruction of • Hard & Deeply Buried Survivability & M&S Critical Nodes • High Velocity Impact • Functionally Deny, Disrupt, • Hard & Deeply Buried Survivability Destroy, Degrade, & Defeat • Engineering Predictive Models • Engineering Predictive • Access Denial • No Collateral Damage Models • Real Time BIA/BDA • Tunnel Defeat • Transmit Weapon • Extreme Over-Pressure Blast Function/Target Attributes • Precise Time Of Arrival • Accurate Delivery • Multiple Delivery Methods Put Enemy’s Warfare • Improved Target BIA • Controlled Emplacement Supporting Facilities at Risk • Weapon Health/Status • Precise Delivery • Initial Target Damage • Low Collateral Damage *Years until SDD initiation High Speed Penetrator (HSP)

Technology Investment Schedule (FY)

Prior 04 05 Concept Definition

Preliminary Design

Final Design/Fabrication

Full Scale Tests HSP Technology Available 4 600 lb version: ~ 60” long

Description Benefits to the Warfighter • Ordnance which survives and functions correctly • Compatible with employment conditions of after a 4000 fps impact into 5000 psi reinforced high speed weapon systems concrete • Supersonic or Hypersonic Cruise Missile Technology • ICBM • Stable and erosion resistant case • Boosted Penetrator • Explosive system surviving impact • Greater depth of penetration than GBU-28 • Fuze mounting assembly for the Multiple Event Hard Target Fuze (MEHTF) which allows fuze to survive and function

19 Area Dominance Vision

nce mina ) an Do UDLS l Urb em (T Tota Syst yered m La r Ter Fa s* nition 25 yr r Mu 16 – inato tes Dom tribu • Deny Enemy Operations in All m At d Ter s* Environments Mi 15 yr S 6 – • Dominate Vertical Dimension OCAA PL • Deny Enemy Operations Over Large • Layered Weapons/Sensors Term Array Near Areas with Persistence yrs* • Effective in Urban Environment 0 – 5 • Persistent Cooperative Munition Constellation • Compact Focused Lethality W/Hs • Variable Yield • Search & Destroy Moving Targets • Deployable Micro-platform over wide area IUGS • Directional • High Loadout Miniature Munition • Effective in Multiple Mission Areas • Advanced Energetics • Standoff Outside Point Defense • Real Time BDI/BDA • Improved Target ID • Low False Target Attack Rate • Weapon Data Link to GIG • Identify Friend or Foe • LADAR/Video Imagery • Two-Way Data Link Operator-in- • Countermeasure Robustness • Improved Non-Coop Target ID the-Loop (OITL) Engagement • Post Launch OITL Decision • ISR Asset to Refine Network • Multi Kills/Weapon Defeat a Broad Spectrum of Centric Target Location & ID • High A/C Load Out Ground Mobile Targets in High • Multiple Munition Cooperative • Reduced Collateral Damage Clutter Environments (Urban Search & Attack Capability • Effective on Moving and CCD Terrain) • Affordable and reliable Targets • Operate in GPS denied environment *Years until SDD initiation Area Dominance Technologies

Efficient Non-Cooperative Propulsion Target Identification Compact Light Weight High L/D Airframe

M1A1 T-72

Advanced Sensors Miniature Low Collateral Damage Warheads

Nano Data Link Energetics Flash LADAR Seeker Miniature Anti-Jam GPS Collective Vision Gateway MEMS IMU SAASM SATCOM Cooperative Control 1deg/hr GPS 1 W JBI ULTRA- BMC4I TIGHT System COUPLING Via JBI

Digital AJ Guidance / ASIC Body Masking 21 Battlespace Access Vision

tion Muni e doff issil tan se M ed S Crui h Spe doff Hig Stan ong ile ry L Term Miss Ve Far uise yrs* ni Cr – 25 st Mi 3I 16 w Co SM P tes Lo JAS tribu m At • Rapid Defeat of Time Critical Anti- Ter Mid yrs* Access Targets B – 15 SD 6 • Hypersonic Cruise Missile Option Term • Subsonic Global Attack Capability Near • Long Range Internal Carriage (F-22) yrs* from International Air Space 0 –5 Munition • Reduced Platform Attrition • Numerous Kills/Munition • Flexible Carriage Enabled by • Lethal Micro Munitions against • High Leverage Munition Miniaturization expanded target set Capability Supporting Near • Multiple Kills Per Munition • Non-Lethal Directed Energy Term GSTF CONOPS • Defeat Mobile and Fixed Targets Payloads • Multiple Kills Per • Smaller More Lethal Warhead • Selectable Lethality from Non-Lethal Pass/Sortie • Multiple Dispense of Guided Micro- to Large Lethal Footprint • Standoff Outside Point Munitions • Minimal Collateral Damage Defenses Rapid Decisive Forced Entry • Munition Borne BIA Rapid Decisive Forced Entry Into High Threat Environments • Improved Accuracy (Better • Compatible with Global Info Grid Into High Threat Environments Than JDAM) • Operate in GPS denied environment • Low Logistics Footprint *Years until SDD initiation LCMCM Enabling Technologies

Survivable, High L/D, Compressed–Carriage Airframe

Efficient Turbofan Deployable base flare for launch Body shaping for stability boundary layer control 2-axis Modular thrust submunition vectoring Smart Wing dispenser • High AR Smart Submunition • Composite layup • Piezoelectric wing twist actuation • Wing deployment tip-airfoil & brake Control fin provisions CG control • 2-axis using fuel • Deployable • All movable Simulation-based management Advanced Reactive design process Multi-fuel provisions • JP-10 for maintainability Materials & • Slurry Fuel for performance High Energy Density Explosives

Wide Area Search FPA LADAR Seeker Miniature AJ Integration into SAR Seeker GPS IMU C2ISR Network 23 High Speed Cruise Missile WTA:Precision Lethal Weaponry

AFRL/MN Prior 06 07 08 09 10

System Design 6.2 Subsystem maturation 6.3 Subsystem demo’s

Propulsion Integration

System level integration

Flight Test

Technology Availability

Description Benefits to the War Fighter • High Speed (Mach 4+) Precision guided weapon capable of attacking time-critical targets with Standoff (1000 NM) • Rapid decisive response • Standoff attack (1000nm) Technology • Aeroheating dissipation • Reduce platform attrition • Controllability at high mach numbers • Multiple Kills Per Sortie • In flight retargeting • High Speed dispense of submuitions • Survivable in a jammed environment • Efficient propulsion 24 Air Supremacy Vision

e inanc Dom e Air rm l Rol DM) ar Te t Dua JDRA F rs* Join sile ( 25 y sile Mis s 16 – MN e Mis e bute reas dgam Attri Inc d En erm ity an Mid T s* Agil 15 yr mics 6 – Dyna • Self Protection Weapon m r Ter • Defeat of Cruise Missile Nea * 5 yrs • Multi-Range Capability 0 – • Long & Short Range • Multi-Role Capability • Basic Research & • Small Missile Defense Enabling Technology • SEAD DramaticallyDramatically ImproveImprove Development leading to • Defeat Small Targets (Size & RCS) Weapon Engagement Mid & Far Term Goals Weapon Engagement • Defeat Highly Maneuverable Tgts Envelopes & System • Propulsion • Improve Target Discrimination / ID Envelopes & System Effectiveness to Gain Total • Airframe agility • Increase Off-Axis Intercept Effectiveness to Gain Total Control of the Airspace • Warhead • Increase Average Velocity Control of the Airspace • Fuzing • Reduce Missile Size • Propulsion & Warhead *Years until SDD initiation Revolutionary Technologies Vision

y tionar evolu gies emo R hnolo ility D Tec ) Mob r Term (MAV mo Fa * hicles ing De ? Yrs Air Ve Mapp s 16 – icro tform ibute M ro Pla Attr e Mic Term nanc Mid yrs* • One Munition For All Targets Ord 6 – 15 ance • Affordable & Reliable Guid Term • Extremely Long Range & Endurance Near • Emerging Cross-Cutting yrs* 0 – 5 Technologies • 24/7 Loiter Capability for 30 Days • High Agility (Air & Space) • Micro Air Vehicle • Transformational Basic Research • Immediate Effect On Target • Air Delivery • Power / Energy • Total Situation Awareness • Multi-Mode Mobility • Fabrication • Countermeasure Robust • Multi-Functionality • Situational Awareness • Tailorable Warhead Effects • Logic/Data Processing • Transition from Open • Buried, Surface, Air, & Space to Interior Environment • Systems Integration Targets • Semi-Autonomous & • Miniaturized Power • Multiple Effects Payload Options Autonomous • Facility Mapping • Gamma, Electromagnetic Pulse, Mobility/Navigation • Real Time Connectivity Blast/Frag, Micro Air Delivered • Micro-Munition • Revolutionary Employment Warheads • Nano-Explosives Of Emerging Munition • No Collateral Damage Technology • Micro-Communication Single Munition Against • Context Awareness All Targets & Scenarios • Revolutionary Employment of Existing Munition Technologies *Years until SDD initiation Directed Energy Technical Capabilities

Precision Engagement / Electronic Attack w/controlled effects Surgically target enemy assets and tailor effects from disrupt to destroy reducing collateral damage and reconstruction costs Force Protection Long Range Strike w/net centric integration w/speed of light delivery Protect air and ground troops and Extend range of airborne and ground-based laser assets during forward deployments weapon and communication systems with high with shields of directed energy to altitude relay mirrors enabling real-time support for thwart intrusions increasing total force anywhere in the world survivability and effectiveness of total force Space Control w/logistical advantage Monitor near and deep space objects for seamless situational awareness of space activities enabling more efficient strategic and tactical planning of military assets

27 Interaction Slide

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Air Force 27 Topics Anticipated in FY05 Solicitation SBIR/STTR Anticipate 36-38 Phase I Awards - Anticipate 25-27 Phase II Awards Celebrating 100 Years of Air & Space Innovation DoD Solicitation Released - Oct 05 Proposals - Jan 06 / Phase I ($100K Max) Contract Awards – Apr 06 / Phase II ($750K Max)Contract Awards – Feb 07 POC: Jill Barfield, MNOB (850) 882-8591 X1204 EMAIL: [email protected] Broad Area Announcements (BAA) z Purpose is to Provide for Research in All Areas of Munitions Technology z BAA Issued June 2002, Open Until Superceded. Updated BAA Published in October 2003 z Ground Rules: z Prior to Formal Proposal, 2 to 3 Page White Paper is REQUIRED, i.e. Contact the Appropriate Munitions Directorate Scientist z Proposals May Be Submitted at Any Time and Will Be Evaluated as Received z No Inherent Funding Attached to the BAA-participating Munitions Directorate, Scientists will Draw Funds from Other Sources POC: Marty Kradlak, Contracting Officer, Phone (850)882-4294 x3402, Email [email protected]

Other Cooperative Efforts - Dual Use R&D (DUS&T); Cooperative R&D Agreements (CRADA); Patents & Licensing; Technology Investment Agreement (TIA); Educational Partnership Agreement (EPA); Commercial Test Agreements (CTA) POC: Jill Barfield, MNOB (850) 882-8591 X1204 EMAIL: [email protected] 28 Munitions Directorate Summary

• Munitions technology investment gives high ROI • Mid term munitions outlook characterized by – Increased lethality (per munition and airframe) – Persistence LongLong RangeRange StrikeStrike – Network centric CounterCounterCBRNECBRNE – Cooperative control UrbanUrban OOpps/CASs/CAS

• AFRL/MN relies on industry partnering to achieve our mission – R & D contractsIrregulaIrregula goal: rr50% && CatastrophicCatastrophic budget ThreatThreat NeutralizationNeutralization BattleBattless–pacepaceStrong AccessAccess SBIR Program AreaArea DominanceDominance – Growing Revolutionary Technology Initiatives AirAir SupremacySupremacy FacilityFacility NeutralizationNeutralization – BAA Allows for Good Ideas from Industry to be Funded without LongRevolutionaryRevolutionary Lead Time TechnologiesTechnologies 29 Weapons Technology for Any Target