Air Armament Symposia Munitions 5 Oct 2005 AAC/PA 09-28-05-376 Col Arnie Bunch Director Munitions Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory oneAFRL Research Sites ROME HANSCOM INFORMATION Space Vehicles Sensors Sensors EDWARDS Propulsion AFOSR WRIGHT-PATT KIRTLAND AIR VEHICLES SPACE VEHICLES BROOKS MATERIALS & MFG DIRECTED ENERGY Human Effectiveness EGLIN PROPULSION SENSORS MUNITIONS MESA HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS Human Effectiveness TYNDALL Information Materials & Mfg 3 MN MISSION: Lead the discovery, GBU-28 “Bunker Buster” development, integration and transition of affordable Powered Standoff Weapon AGM-130 munitions technologies for our air and space force Laser Guided Munitions Advance Unitary Penetrator (AUP) Powered Low Cost Autonomous Hard Target Smart Fuze (HTSF) Attack System (PLOCAAS) AMRAAM Small Smart Bomb (SSB) Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-Off Missile (Jassm) Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Munitions Directorate Organization Executive Officer Director Associate Director Deputy Director Chief Scientist Capt Rod Bass Col Arnold Bunch Dr. John Pletcher, Jr. Mr. George Mooney Dr Bob Sierakowski s Directorate n o Adv Guidance Division Ordnance Division Assess & Demo Division niti Product Divisions Ms Sandra Lefstad Mr Scott Teel Col Chuck Wolfe Mu Financial Contracting Corp Development Int & Ops Division / CIO Senior IMA Mr Paul Higgins Maj Wayne Register Ms Mary Perry Mr. Dale Palmer Col Mark Koch 5 FY05 AF S&T Budget BY BY BUDGET ACTIVITY DIRECTORATE / TECH AREAS Dual Use Basic Sensors $5M (<1%) Research $196M (11%) $254M (14%) Air Vehicles Munitions 6.3 $125M (7%) $80M (4%) $657M 6.1 36% Information $254M $129M (7%) 14% Propulsion $300M (17%) Directed 6.2 Energy $904M $188M (10%) 50% Human Effectiveness Space Vehicles $120M (7%) Materials $211M (12%) & Mfg $208M (11%) TOTAL: 1.815B Numbers May Not Add Due to Rounding 6 AFRL/MN Budget Totals FY 04-05 FY04 FY05 Customer Appropriated Appropriated $65M Customer S&T S&T $78M $80M $88M $153 Million $158 Million 7 Current MN Investments in the Industrial Base FY02-05 OBLIGATED $ $33M Major Defense Contractors $76M $127M Other Large Business SBIR/STTR Other Small Business $78M $93M Universities TOTAL CURRENT INVESTMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL BASE $ 407M 8 MN Investments in the Industrial Base (Future) 6.2 Funding ($M) 6.3 Funding ($M) Assessments $3 Explosives $91 $84 $27 Fuzes $58 Warheads $13 $51 Navigation & Control $49 $29 Seekers $50 $31 Signal & Imaging $49 $22 $10 Processing/Algorithms Munition Integration $567M FUTURE INVESTMENT FY05-11 GROWS CORE COMPETENCY TECH BASE & ENABLES FUTURE DEMONSTRATIONS 9 Munitions Directorate Role in Acquisition Process Navy Army AF Joint Vision ACC AFSOC AF AFSPC Vision JV2020 NWV AF2025 Panels MAPs Integrating AAC CRRA Concepts Task Forces AF Labs Industry Academia Integrated Technology Program Time Phased Technology Tech Analysis & Goals Trade Offs Weapon Attributes / CONOPS vs Technologies 10 MN Capability Based Technology Visions BattlespaceBattlespace AirAir SupremacySupremacy AccessAccess LRSLRS RevolutionaryRevolutionary UrbanUrban OOpps/CASs/CAS TechnologiesTechnologies AreaArea Facility DominanceDominance CounterCounter CBRNECBRNE Facility NeutralizationNeutralization IrregularIrregular && CatastrophicCatastrophic ThreatThreat NeutralizationNeutralization 11 Irregular & Catastrophic Threat Neutralization Vision STOP CrashPAD Shredder CrashPAD P3I /SOFTNET Shredder P3I BATCAM Agent Defeat Weapon dSTOP BATCAM Spirals Har GWOT Dominance Weapon LCD 500lb Bomb HardSTOP P3I Near Term Mid Term Attributes Far Term 0 –5 yrs 6 – 15 yrs 16 – 25 yrs • Disrupt • Defeat/Destro • Neutralize CBRNE Targets /Degrad • Soft/Harden e CBRNE • Minimum Targety C Based • Effective Against All Agent BRN • Limited-Targeted/M Based Targ Collateral Effects E Targets Ty obile ets pes Collateral Effects • Alternate Fills/Payloads • Post Impact Verification Of • Engineering Predictive Models • Bio/Chem Decomposition Neutralization • F2T2EA Of GWOT Targets • Less Damaging Deliver • Mod • el VV&A • Accurate Deliver System Total Defeat Of GWOT Target War • st fighting Capability • Li 1 Principle Predictive My mited-W y • GWOT Target Neutralization Collateral Effectseap • Total Local Area Dominance on Ba • • Miniaturized Local Areased Precise Deliver o • Air Delivered • del Deliver Minimum Weapon Based Selective Lethal Trackin Options y • No Collateral Effects • y Collateral Effects g With Real Time Targeting • • Quick Response Time • Embedded Local Area Immediate Response Time Dominance • Rapid Res pons e Time EliminateEliminate Irregular,Irregular, CatastrophicCatastrophic && DisruptiveDisruptive ThreatsThreats WhileWhile MinimizingMinimizing CollateralCollateral DamagDamag ee Irregular & Catastrophic Threat Neutralization Vision STOP CrashPAD Shredder CrashPAD P3I /SOFTNET Shredder P3I BATCAM Agent Defeat Weapon dSTOP BATCAM Spirals Har GWOT Dominance Weapon LCD 500lb Bomb HardSTOP P3I Near Term Mid Term Attributes Far Term 0 –5 yrs 6 – 15 yrs 16 – 25 yrs • Disrupt • Defeat/Destro • Neutralize CBRNE Targets /Degrad • Soft/Harden e • Minimum Targety Based • CBRNE CBR Effective Against All Agent • Limited-Targeted/M Based Targ Collateral YEffectse NE Targets obile et ars Types Collateral Effects s • Alternate Fills/Payloads to • Syst Post Impact Verification Of • Engineering Predictive Models • Bio/ChemDe vDecompositionem Neutralization • F2T2EA Of GWOT Targets • Less Damagingelo Deliverp • men Mode • Sy & t • Total Defeatl VV&A Of GWOT Target War Accurate Deliver stemD • st emo fighting Capability • Limi 1 Principle Predictivenstra My ted-W y • GWOT Target Neutralizationtion Collateral Effectseap (SD • Total Local Area Dominance on Ba • D) • Miniaturized Local Areased Precise DeliverIn o • Air Delivered • itiat del Deliver Minimum Weapon Basedion Selective Lethal Trackin Options y • No Collateral Effects • y Collateral Effects g With Real Time Targeting • • Quick Response Time • Embedded Local Area Immediate Response Time Dominance • Rapid Res pons e Time EliminateEliminate Irregular,Irregular, CatastrophicCatastrophic && DisruptiveDisruptive ThreatsThreats WhileWhile MinimizingMinimizing CollateralCollateral DamagDamag ee 13 Shredder • Sled Test Video – Date: 23 June 2005 – Purpose: demonstrate the survivability of the Shredder design and the ability to function correctly. The test was conducted against a 4 foot thick, reinforced concrete target, at > 1000 ft/s. • Arena Test Video – Date: 27 July 2005 – Purpose: Collect fragmentation data to be used in the agent defeat modeling codes to better model the effectiveness of the Shredder warhead 14 WMD Counterforce Technologies Enabling Technology Real Agent BL-3 Predictive Diagnostic Thermobaric AD Taggants Labs Models Development Payloads Weapon GSI Concepts -033 PAW CrashPAD Shredder IM Shredder Agent Denial Weapon High Speed Weapon Payload Test Beds & Other Capabilities WPMBAD Arena Testing Chem/Bio Bio Plume Baseline Denial Production Test Bed Comparisons Test-Beds 15 AFRL/MNAV Major Counter-CBRNE Activities FY05 • Supported ACC/DRMA in writing Capabilities Decision Document (CDD) for an Agent Defeat Weapon, Apr-Jun 05 • Primary S&T support for AFMC/EN I-Summit activities, direct participation and with AAC/XR, APR-Present • AFMC-DTRA Strategic Corporate Board Meeting, May 05, Kirtland AFB...AAC/EN-AAC/XR-AFRL/MN-DTRA/TDS, Munitions Steering Group SES, O-6 Meeting, Eglin AFB Apr 05. Similar meetings held in Oct and Dec 04 respectively. • AFRL-USSTRATCOM Technology Focus Days, Combating WMD, Jul 05 • AFRL/MN Counterforce Munitions brief to Dr. Barna, Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts, Apr 05 • Co-Chair for the Test, Technology, and Demonstration Working Group for the Agent Defeat Initiative sponsored by Dr. Klein, ASD for NBC and Dr. Sega DDR&E 16 Urban OPs 2 sizes HardSTOP Small Attack Weapon Micro Air Vehicles TMD Low Collateral Dominator Resupply Damage Warhead Vehicle 17 Facility Neutralization Vision es oach Appr ovel m N r Ter TIF on Fa s* H eap 25 yr feat W 16 – MOP al De es B tion ribut MOA on Func Att eap Term • Innovative Techniques to Exploit feat W r Mid rs* el De trato 15 y Tunn Pene 6 – Target Vulnerabilities peed igh S • Deep Digger H Term Near • Address Soft, Hardened, Urban, • Micro Robotics yrs* 0 – 5 Deep & Transportable Facilities • Creative Approaches • Hard & Deeply Buried • Eliminate Target Warfighting • Defeat Difficult Facilities • Hyper Velocity Impact Capability Through Destruction of • Hard & Deeply Buried Survivability & M&S Critical Nodes • High Velocity Impact • Functionally Deny, Disrupt, • Hard & Deeply Buried Survivability Destroy, Degrade, & Defeat • Engineering Predictive Models • Engineering Predictive • Access Denial • No Collateral Damage Models • Real Time BIA/BDA • Tunnel Defeat • Transmit Weapon • Extreme Over-Pressure Blast Function/Target Attributes • Precise Time Of Arrival • Accurate Delivery • Multiple Delivery Methods Put Enemy’s Warfare • Improved Target BIA • Controlled Emplacement Supporting Facilities at Risk • Weapon Health/Status • Precise Delivery • Initial Target Damage • Low Collateral Damage *Years until SDD initiation High Speed Penetrator (HSP) Technology Investment Schedule (FY) Prior 04 05 Concept Definition Preliminary Design Final Design/Fabrication Full Scale Tests HSP Technology Available 4 600 lb version: ~ 60” long Description Benefits to the Warfighter • Ordnance which survives and functions correctly • Compatible with employment conditions of after a 4000 fps impact into 5000 psi reinforced high speed