Prospects of Air Traffic Management in South Eastern Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prospects of Air Traffic Management in South Eastern Europe S. Steiner, T. Mihetec, A. Božičević: Prospects of Air Traffic Management in South Eastern Europe SANJA STEINER, Ph.D. Traffic Planning E-mail: [email protected] Review TOMISLAV MIHETEC, Ph.D. candidate Accepted: Sep. 8, 2009 E-mail: [email protected] Approved: July 5, 2010 ANA BOŽIČEVIĆ, Ph.D. candidate E-mail: [email protected] University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport & Traffic Sciences Vukelićeva 4, Zagreb, Croatia PROSPECTS OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION In the forthcoming period the European air traffic The regulatory environment of the aviation industry management will handle double flight operations than has significantly changed over the last two decades. today – from 1.7 to 2.1 higher traffic level in 2025 than The origins of these changes lie in the aviation indus- in 2005 [1]. The problem of the European airspace try liberalization. The 1978 United States Deregulation fragmentation should be solved by the comprehensive Act was the most important event in the worldwide avi- dynamic harmonization programs, which can contrib- ation market, changing the face of civil aviation in the ute to effective increase of airspace capacity and in- United States. The required permission for airlines to crease of air transport efficiency. The main objective serve any given route was dismantled with the Deregu- of the development strategy refers to the implemen- lation Act. As it followed, Europe launched its three Lib- tation of reformation processes of the European air eralisation Aviation Packages during last two decades, 1 traffic management system through functional ATM gradually liberalised the aviation market of the mem- regionalization. Encouraged by the Single European ber countries [3]. Air transport had been traditionally Sky project, and through airspace de-fragmentation, a highly regulated industry, performed dominantly by numerous projects have been initiated by Eurocontrol national flag carriers and state-owned airports. The in- in cooperation with the European Commission. One of ternal market has removed all commercial restrictions them is establishing of the Functional Airspace Block for airlines flying within the European Union, such as in South Eastern Europe. The implementation of regu- restrictions on the routes, the number of flights or the latory, institutional and legal framework of the Single setting of fares, while that is not the case when flying 2 European Sky FAB would ensure the expansion of the to countries outside EU4. The creation of the single Eu- European air traffic market to South Eastern Europe, ropean market brought significant benefits to airspace counting over 500 million potential users [2]. Croatia users. Since 1993 the number of airline routes has and all the other countries in the region have to adopt increased by 170 percent within EU, ensuring greater 3 the provisions of ECAA Agreement and EU air trans- choice of destinations and direct flights for passen- port acquis in their national legislation. gers. Between 1993 and 2006, the number of routes This paper specifies the main determinants of the with more than two carriers rose by 300 percent [4]. strategic development as well as the key factors which Due to the EU enlargement in 2004, the air traffic in influence the European air traffic dynamics. The paper accession countries doubled in just two years. elaborates the indicators and significant elements of International aviation has traditionally been gov- the required ATM reforms in South Eastern Europe on erned by bilateral agreements between individual the samples of six ANSPs according to ECAA Agree- countries, restricting the number of airlines on the ment and EU acquis. routes concerned, the number of flights and the pos- sible destinations. In order to overcome this limitation KEYWORDS the European Community is extending its policy over Single European Sky, European Common Aviation Area, Air its borders. In June 2005 transport ministers agreed Traffic Management, South Eastern Europe, Functional Air- on a roadmap for the development of external aviation space Block policy. The extension of a single market to neighbour- Promet – Traffic&Transportation, Vol. 22, 2010, No. 4, 293-302 293 S. Steiner, T. Mihetec, A. Božičević: Prospects of Air Traffic Management in South Eastern Europe ing countries is a key EU objective. As the objective of grated aviation market with 500 million potential pas- EU external policy is the creation of Common Aviation sengers [10]. Area by 2010, in June 2006 the ECAA agreement was The European Investment Bank in cooperation with signed. This agreement integrates partner countries in the Nordic Aviation Resources launched in 2000 the South Eastern Europe – (Albania, Bosnia and Herze- Air Traffic Infrastructure Regional Study which served govina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and as the basis for investment project in the transport Kosovo) into a single market [5]. The ECAA partner sector. The key findings were presented as: differ- countries will adopt the EU air transport regulations. ences in aerospace organisation in the countries, lack A competitive and sustainable air transport indus- of integration of the ATM infrastructure in the region try needs a high performance ATM system. This will be (as area control centres and non optimal routes and achieved by the integration of the European airspace sectors are designed to meet national requirements), by means of dynamic harmonisation programmes [6]. large amount of airspace used for military purposes, The strategic development programmes of the Euro- insufficient interoperability as result of national indus- pean airspace refer to the solving of the problem of trial interests in investment decisions (area control fragmented airspace by means of ATM regionalisation, centres have limited technical and operational com- increasing airspace capacity and traffic efficiency [7]. patibility with neighbours), shortage of air traffic con- Thus the 2004 adaptation of the Single Sky legislation trollers in the region, on-job training as result of very brought legal basis for a range of activities in the ATM diverse environment (design and equipment of area system. The European Commission has mandated Eu- control centres) [11]. rocontrol to provide technical assistance and develop Membership of South Eastern European countries the implementing rules within the SES5 framework. in the European institutions has to be observed in or- The technological dimension of SES has been articu- der to analyse the Institutional framework of air traf- lated by SESAR6, speeding up the innovations in avia- fic control and aviation safety in the SEE Region. The tion industry. The fragmentation issue will be solved ICAO8 and the ECAC9 define the safety and the security through the Functional Airspace Block concept, where standards for their members, audit compliance and air traffic would be based on operational requirements, provide training. All countries analysed are members regardless of the existing boundaries [8]. of four European institutions with complementary mandates addressing cross-border issues in air traffic 2. REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT IN control safety and security. All countries observed are SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE members of JAA10 even though most of its functions are delegated to EASA11, except the liaison between 12 The European air transport sector which can be de- EASA and CAA of non EASA JAA member states and fined as airports, airlines, Air Traffic Management and for training functions. EASA competences have been the manufacturing industry, comprises more than 130 expanded to safety regulation of aerodromes, air traf- airlines, operating across over 450 airports with some fic management and air navigation services, and for 13 60 air navigation service providers. Air transport sec- the total system approach to civil aviation safety . All tor represents a complex and unique global network SEE countries participate in the work of Eurocontrol linking people, playing a vital role in further integration which is mandated to integrate air traffic control across and development of the enlarged Europe. Air transport Europe. Eurocontrol provides technical expertise for makes a contribution to the European economy with aeronautics and flight across Europe and is working more than 3 million people employed in the EU and a on the building of a homogenous Pan European air contribution of EUR 120 billion to the European GDP. traffic management system. Eurocontrol CFMU14 man- According to Eurocontrol CFMU7 data, there are on ages the flow of 44 states which participate in ECAC in the average 28,000 flights on a daily basis in Europe. order to ensure that the user demand does not over- The number of flights in Europe reached in 2008 an load the capacities of the existing infrastructure. Euro- all time high (over 10 million flights), the peak being control CRCO15 provides Pan European cost-recovery with 34,476 flights. The growth under the ECAA Agree- system that funds air navigation facilities and services ment counted over 6.6 million passengers travelling and supports Air Traffic Management developments. between the EU and the South Eastern Europe in 2007 Eurocontrol manages Aviation Safety and Traffic Con- (a 5% increase over the 2006 figures) [9]. trol II project, which provides assistance to countries The extension of the European air transport market in order to fulfil the future international, regional and in South Eastern Europe will have positive outcome national responsibilities,
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014
    Prior compliance list of aircraft operators specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator – June 2014 Inclusion in the prior compliance list allows aircraft operators to know which Member State will most likely be attributed to them as their administering Member State so they can get in contact with the competent authority of that Member State to discuss the requirements and the next steps. Due to a number of reasons, and especially because a number of aircraft operators use services of management companies, some of those operators have not been identified in the latest update of the EEA- wide list of aircraft operators adopted on 5 February 2014. The present version of the prior compliance list includes those aircraft operators, which have submitted their fleet lists between December 2013 and January 2014. BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 29424 ASTRAL AVIATION LTD KENYA 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 40259 BRAVO CARGO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS 39758 CHALLENGER AERO PHILIPPINES f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR INC UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    Official Journal L 139 of the European Union Volume 64 English edition Legislation 23 April 2021 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/662 of 22 April 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) . 1 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/663 of 22 April 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlordecone in or on certain products (1) . 148 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/664 of 22 April 2021 on a regulatory framework for the U-space (1) . 161 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/665 of 22 April 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards requirements for providers of air traffic management/air navigation services and other air traffic management network functions in the U-space airspace designated in controlled airspace (1) . 184 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/666 of 22 April 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 as regards requirements for manned aviation operating in U-space airspace (1) . 187 (1) Text with EEA relevance. Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. EN The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 E Relazioni Di Legge
    BILANCIO DI ESERCIZIO 2006 E RELAZIONI DI LEGGE APPROVATI DAL CONSIGLIO DI AMMINISTRAZIONE NELLA SEDUTA DEL 30 MARZO 2007 2 INDICE GENERALE ¾ Relazione sulla gestione pag. 5 ¾ Bilancio di esercizio pag. 87 • Stato patrimoniale pag. 89 • Conto economico pag. 93 • Nota integrativa pag. 95 ¾ Relazione del Collegio sindacale pag. 125 ¾ Relazione della Società di revisione pag. 131 3 4 RELAZIONE SULLA GESTIONE 2006 APPROVATA DAL CONSIGLIO DI AMMINISTRAZIONE NELLA SEDUTA DEL 30 MARZO 2007 5 6 INDICE 1. Bilancio di esercizio 2006 pag. 9 1.1 Premessa 1.2 Conto economico gestionale riclassificato 1.3 Ricavi complessivi 1.4 Costi complessivi 1.5 Costi del lavoro: dipendenti e ditte esterne 1.6 Costi operativi 1.7 Costi generali 1.8 Costi per ammortamenti 1.9 Proventi ed oneri finanziari 1.10 Partite straordinarie 1.11 Crediti e contenziosi 1.12 Partecipazioni societarie 1.13 Conto economico gestionale riclassificato a scalare 1.14 Indici di redditività, indicatori finanziari e indici di gestione caratteristica 2. Dati di traffico pag. 33 2.1 Dati complessivi di traffico 2005-2006 2.2 Tipologia e direttrici di traffico 2.3 Traffico di linea 2.4 Traffico charter Est Europa 2.5 Traffico charter altri paesi 2.6 Traffico cargo 2.7 Traffico aviazione generale 2.8 Traffico per aeroporto di destinazione/provenienza 2.9 Distribuzione mensile, giornaliera e oraria dei passeggeri 2.10 Voli e passeggeri 2007 2.11 Dati statistici analitici 3. Assetto societario e privatizzazione pag. 57 3.1 Aumento di capitale dei Soci 3.2 Ingresso nella Società di Geat S.p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • Rapporto Continentale 2005 06
    Unioncamere Lombardia Indicatore di accessibilità continentale N° 7 Giugno 2005 Indicatore di accessibilità continentale – Giugno 2005 2 Sommario 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2. INDICATORE CONGIUNTURALE DI ACCESSIBILITÀ CONTINENTALE 4 2.1 Rilevazione giugno 2005 4 2.2 Analisi del mercato del trasporto aereo continentale 6 2.2.1 Network di scali collegati 6 2.2.2 Frequenze settimanali e vettori 9 3. NOTE METODOLOGICHE 17 3.1 Perché un indicatore di accessibilità continentale 17 3.2 Obiettivi e caratteristiche dell’indicatore di accessibilità continentale 17 ALLEGATO A – INDICATORI DI ACCESSIBILITÀ PER SINGOLI AEROPORTI (PRIMI 30) 20 ALLEGATO B – INDICI PARZIALI E FINALI DEI SERVIZI AEREI OFFERTI DALLE CITTÀ 21 CERTeT Centro di Economia Regionale, dei Trasporti e del Turismo Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi Indicatore di accessibilità continentale – Giugno 2005 3 1. Executive summary Allo scopo di esaminare l’accessibilità fornita dagli aeroporti ai territori a livello interno europeo, l’analisi presentata confronta quantitativamente il livello di servizio offerto dalle compagnie aeree in ciascun aeroporto prendendo in considerazione sia la frequenza dei collegamenti che la loro “importanza”, misurata in base alle caratteristiche economiche ed aeronautiche delle destinazioni raggiunte. Il focus dell’analisi è centrato non tanto sui singoli aeroporti quanto sulle principali aree metropolitane europee, considerando quindi unitariamente tutti gli scali (compresi quelli secondari, portati alla ribalta dall’ormai consolidato fenomeno low cost) che contribuiscono all’accessibilità di un’area metropolitana. I risultati dell’analisi relativa alla stagione estiva 2005 ribadiscono la supremazia di Londra anche a livello continentale. La capitale inglese, col suo ampio sistema di aeroporti (Heathrow, Gatwick, Luton, Stansted e City) risulta la meglio collegata a livello interno europeo.
    [Show full text]
  • Contractions 7340.2 CHG 3
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION JO 7340.2 CHG 3 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to Order JO 7340.2, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all air traffic field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all intemational aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. May 7, 2009. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Cancellations, additions, and modifications (CAM) are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the page control chart attachment. tf ,<*. ^^^Nancy B. Kalinowski Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: y-/-<3? Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-4S4 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 5/7/09 JO 7340.2 CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−3 . 1/15/09 CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−3 . 5/7/09 1−1−1 . 6/5/08 1−1−1 . 5/7/09 3−1−15 . 6/5/08 3−1−15 . 6/5/08 3−1−16 . 6/5/08 3−1−16 . 5/7/09 3−1−19 . 6/5/08 3−1−19 . 6/5/08 3−1−20 .
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Bankruptcy: the Post-Deregulation Epidemic
    Airline Bankruptcy: The Post-Deregulation Epidemic By Paul Stephen Dempsey McGill University Institute of Air & Space Law Copyright © 2012 by the author • “Airline deregulation is a bankrupt policy.” Hobart Rowen Washington Post columnist Every major US interstate airline at the time of deregulation in 1978 has since visited bankruptcy court, several more than once. 15 US AIRLINE INDUSTRY NET PROFIT MARGINS 1950-2009 10 5 0 -5 -10 net profit margins net -15 -20 year • 2000 – U.S. profit $2.5 billion • 2001 - U.S. loses $8.3 billion • 2002 - U.S. loses $11.4 billion • 2003 - U.S. loses $1.7 billion • 2004 - U.S. loses $9.1billion • 2005 - U.S. loses $27.2 billion • 2006 - U.S. profit $18.2 billion • 2007 - U.S. profit $7.7 billion • 2008 - U.S. loses $23.8 billion • 2009 - U.S. loses $2.5 billion • 2010 – U.S. profit $3.6 billion US Carriers cumulatively lost $52 billion in this decade. U.S. General Accountability Office • “Structurally, the airline industry is characterized by high fixed costs, cyclical demand for its services, intense competition, and vulnerability to external shocks. As a result, airlines have been more prone to failure than many other businesses, and the sector’s financial performance has continually been very weak . • “Since the 1978 economic deregulation of the U.S. airline industry, airline bankruptcy filings have become prevalent in the United States, and airlines fail at a higher rate than companies in most other industries.” • U.S. Government Accountability Office, Commercial Aviation: Bankruptcy and Pension Problems are Symptoms of Underlying Structural Issues (Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Incontro Sala Convegni HOTEL HOLIDAY INN Padova, 21 Febbraio 2007
    Comu ne di Comu ne di Venezia Padova VENEZIA e PADOVA: INCONTRI PER LA DEFINIZIONE DI SCENARI DI SVILUPPO per un rafforzamento dell’asse Venezia-Padova come fattore competitivo del nord est materiali istruttori POLITICHE DI SETTORE E SERVIZI DI AREA VASTA: FATTORI DI ° SUCCESSO O DI CONDIZIONAMENTO incontro Sala convegni HOTEL HOLIDAY INN Padova, 21 febbraio 2007 Organizzazione Area Pianificazione strategica Della Direzione Programmazione e Controllo e Pianificazione strategica del Comune di Venezia S. POLO 1296 - Calle de Ca' Bollani o dei Coralli - 30124 VENEZIA tel. 0412446015 - fax 0412446032 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.comune.venezia.it/pianostrategico Riferimenti: Turiddo Pugliese (dirigente) tel. 041.2446015, Fax 041.2446032, cell. 348.6012008 [email protected] Maria Cristina Bordin (collaboratrice) Tel. 041.2446017, Fax 041.2446032 [email protected] I materiali proposti in questo documento sono stati curati con la collaborazione di Federico Della Puppa Stampato nel mese di febbraio 2007 presso il Centro Produzione Multimediale - Comune di Venezia INFRASTRUTTURE E SERVIZI DI AREA VASTA: FATTORI DI SUCCESSO E DI CONDIZIONAMENTO Cosa può fare Venezia per Padova e cosa può fare Padova per Venezia Materiali istruttori per il terzo incontro Indice 1. Innovazione e capacità innovativa 2. Università e ricerca 3. Infrastrutture e logistica 4. Il turismo 5. Le fiere 1 INFRASTRUTTURE E SERVIZI DI AREA VASTA: FATTORI DI SUCCESSO E DI CONDIZIONAMENTO Cosa può fare Venezia per Padova e cosa può fare Padova per Venezia Materiali istruttori per il terzo incontro Premessa In Italia, e nel Veneto in particolare, la dimensione locale dello sviluppo ha coinciso con l'affermazione di un'economia basata su reti – di piccole e medie imprese, di piccoli e medi comuni – nelle quali la dimensione diffusa è stato il fattore determinante di una spinta endogena allo sviluppo che ha determinato nuovi assetti socio-territoriali, caratterizzati da sistemi produttivi locali, aree-sistema e distretti industriali.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Federal Aviation Administration
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7340.495 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: November 19, 2018 Cancellation Date: November 19, 2019 SUBJ: Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (excluding U.S.) 1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice modifies FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, Chapter 3, Sections 1, 2, and 3, ICAO Aircraft Company Three-Letter Identifier and/or Telephony Designator. This notice reflects recent changes initiated by countries other than the United States (U.S.) including new ICAO three letter designators (3LDs), deletions of defunct ICAO 3LDs, and modifications to ICAO 3LDs, associated telephonies, and companies/agencies. This Notice supplements FAA Order JO 7340.2 until the additions and modifications are incorporated into the Order. This Notice does not replace or substitute for GENOTs issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) for ICAO 3LDs assigned and authorized for U.S. aircraft operators. 2. Audience. This notice applies to the following Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, and System Operations Services; ATO Safety and Technical Training; and all associated air traffic control facilities. This notice is informational in nature and does not require documentation as supplemental training in FAA Form 3120-1, Training and Proficiency Record. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/ and on the air traffic publications website at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Source Document. The source document for the ICAO 3LD additions and modifications contained in this notice is ICAO Document 8585, Designators for Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities, and Services.
    [Show full text]