Variation in the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Rocks: the North Paramushir Hydrothermal Magmatic System, Kuril Islands Yu
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The 2019 Eruption Dynamics and Morphology at Ebeko Volcano Monitored by Unoccupied Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Field Stations
remote sensing Article The 2019 Eruption Dynamics and Morphology at Ebeko Volcano Monitored by Unoccupied Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Field Stations Thomas R. Walter 1,* , Alexander Belousov 2, Marina Belousova 2, Tatiana Kotenko 2 and Andreas Auer 3 1 Department of Geophysics, GFZ Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2 Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, FED RAS, 683006 Petropavlovsk, Russia; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (T.K.) 3 Department of Geoscience, Shimane University, Matsue 690-8504, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 May 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: Vulcanian explosions are hazardous and are often spontaneous and direct observations are therefore challenging. Ebeko is an active volcano on Paramushir Island, northern Kuril Islands, showing characteristic Vulcanian-type activity. In 2019, we started a comprehensive survey using a combination of field station records and repeated unoccupied aircraft system (UAS) surveys to describe the geomorphological features of the edifice and its evolution during ongoing activity. Seismic data revealed the activity of the volcano and were complemented by monitoring cameras, showing a mean explosion interval of 34 min. Digital terrain data generated from UAS quadcopter photographs allowed for the identification of the dimensions of the craters, a structural architecture and the tephra deposition at cm-scale resolution. The UAS was equipped with a thermal camera, which in combination with the terrain data, allowed it to identify fumaroles, volcano-tectonic structures and vents and generate a catalog of 282 thermal spots. The data provide details on a nested crater complex, aligned NNE-SSW, erupting on the northern rim of the former North Crater. -
2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory
The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys . The Alaska Volcano Observtory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Southeast flank of Augustine Volcano showing summit steaming, superheated fumarole jet, and ash dusting on snow. View is toward the northwest with Iniskin Bay in the distance. Photograph taken by Chris Waythomas, AVO/USGS, December 20, 2005. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory By R.G. McGimsey, C.A. Neal, J.P. Dixon, U.S. Geological Survey, and Sergey Ushakov, Institute of Volcanology and Seismology The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophuysical Surveys. The Alaska Volcano Observatory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. -
The 2018 Fieldworks at Alaid Volcano, Atlasov Island, the Kuriles
BULLETIN OF KAMCHATKA REGIONAL ASSOCIATION «EDUCATIONAL-SCIENTIFIC CENTER». EARTH SCIENCES. ISSUE 39. No. 3. 2018 Original Russian Text © Rashidov V.A., Anikin L.P., 2018, published in Vestnik KRAUNTs. Nauki o Zemle, Vol. 39, No 3 (2018), pp. 105−113. Original text is available at http://www.kscnet.ru/journal/kraesc/article/view/220. THE 2018 FIELDWORKS AT ALAID VOLCANO, ATLASOV ISLAND, THE KURILES In August 2018, we carried out comprehensive employee A.N. Bichenko allowed us to conclude that geological and geophysical investigation of the in August and September, 2018 Alaid Volcano was in northwestern part of island type Alaid Volcano located the stage of fumarolic activity. in the Kuril Island arc on Atlasov Island (fig. a1). These In 2018, the research area was located within the research study is a part of a continuous investigation coastal zone from the Nochnoi Cape to the Plecho resulted from field works performed on Alaid Volcano Cape, and the base camp, as in 2014, was located at in 2007, 2008, 2013−2016. (Rashidov, 2013; Rashidov, the mouth of Alaidsky Brook (fig. 1b, 1c). Anikin, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017; Rashidov et al., Unlike the Baklan, Alaid and Severny bays 2013). Personal observations, Internet data analysis, (fig. 1b), landing on this part of Atlasov Island is information received from the Vityaz-Aero company’s difficult because of the large amount of seaweed. helicopter plane commander D.A. Zaderey and photos, Quite comfortable conditions for successful field work courtesy of the Volcanoes of Kamchatka natural park’s this year resulted from many streams and large amount Fig. -
EGU2017-5669-3, 2017 EGU General Assembly 2017 © Author(S) 2017
Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 19, EGU2017-5669-3, 2017 EGU General Assembly 2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Hydrothermal fluxes of magmatic chlorine and sulfur from volcano-hydrothermal systems of the Kuril Islands (Russia). Elena Kalacheva (1) and Yuri Taran (1,2) (1) Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, FED RAS, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683006, Russia ([email protected]), (2) Institute of Geophysics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City 04510, México ([email protected]) The hydrothermal flux may be provided by the discharge of fluids formed at depth over the magma body and/or by acid waters, which are formed by the absorption of the ascending volcanic vapor by shallow groundwater. Thus, the anion composition (Cl and SO4) of the discharging thermal waters from a volcano-hydrothermal system in many cases originates from the volcanic vapor and should be taken into account in estimations of the magmatic volatile output and volatile recycling in subduction zones. Here we report the chemical composition of thermal waters and the measured solute fluxes from volcano-hydrothermal systems of Kuril Islands including Paramushir (Ebeko volcanic centre), Shiashkotan (volcanoes Sinarka and Kuntomintar), Ketoy (Pallas volcano), Kunashir (vol- canoes Mendeleev and Golovnin). The fluxes were estimated after measuring flow rates and water composition of streams that drain thermal fields of islands. The maximal hydrothermal flux of Cl and S within the Kuril Chain was measured for Ebeko volcano, Paramushir (drained by Yurieva River) as 82 t/d and 222 t/d of chloride and sulfate, respectively. This is comparable with output by fumaroles of Ebeko. -
USGS Open-File Report 2009-1133, V. 1.2, Table 3
Table 3. (following pages). Spreadsheet of volcanoes of the world with eruption type assignments for each volcano. [Columns are as follows: A, Catalog of Active Volcanoes of the World (CAVW) volcano identification number; E, volcano name; F, country in which the volcano resides; H, volcano latitude; I, position north or south of the equator (N, north, S, south); K, volcano longitude; L, position east or west of the Greenwich Meridian (E, east, W, west); M, volcano elevation in meters above mean sea level; N, volcano type as defined in the Smithsonian database (Siebert and Simkin, 2002-9); P, eruption type for eruption source parameter assignment, as described in this document. An Excel spreadsheet of this table accompanies this document.] Volcanoes of the World with ESP, v 1.2.xls AE FHIKLMNP 1 NUMBER NAME LOCATION LATITUDE NS LONGITUDE EW ELEV TYPE ERUPTION TYPE 2 0100-01- West Eifel Volc Field Germany 50.17 N 6.85 E 600 Maars S0 3 0100-02- Chaîne des Puys France 45.775 N 2.97 E 1464 Cinder cones M0 4 0100-03- Olot Volc Field Spain 42.17 N 2.53 E 893 Pyroclastic cones M0 5 0100-04- Calatrava Volc Field Spain 38.87 N 4.02 W 1117 Pyroclastic cones M0 6 0101-001 Larderello Italy 43.25 N 10.87 E 500 Explosion craters S0 7 0101-003 Vulsini Italy 42.60 N 11.93 E 800 Caldera S0 8 0101-004 Alban Hills Italy 41.73 N 12.70 E 949 Caldera S0 9 0101-01= Campi Flegrei Italy 40.827 N 14.139 E 458 Caldera S0 10 0101-02= Vesuvius Italy 40.821 N 14.426 E 1281 Somma volcano S2 11 0101-03= Ischia Italy 40.73 N 13.897 E 789 Complex volcano S0 12 0101-041 -
Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes
Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes August 1, 2011 COVER PHOTO: Ash, gas, and water vapor cloud from Redoubt volcano as seen from Cannery Road in Kenai, Alaska on March 31, 2009. Photograph by Neil Sutton, used with permission. Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes August 1, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Integrated Response to Volcanic Ash ....................................................................... 3 1.2 Data Collection and Processing ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Information Management and Coordination .............................................................. 4 1.4 Warning Dissemination ............................................................................................. 5 2.0 Responsibilities of the Participating Agencies ........................................................... 5 2.1 DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (DHS&EM) ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 ALASKA VOLCANO OBSERVATORY (AVO) ........................................................... 6 2.2.1 Organization ...................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 General Operational Procedures ...................................................................... 8 -
Russia Background
The World Factbook Central Asia :: Russia Introduction :: Russia Background: Founded in the 12th century, the Principality of Muscovy, was able to emerge from over 200 years of Mongol domination (13th-15th centuries) and to gradually conquer and absorb surrounding principalities. In the early 17th century, a new Romanov Dynasty continued this policy of expansion across Siberia to the Pacific. Under PETER I (ruled 1682-1725), hegemony was extended to the Baltic Sea and the country was renamed the Russian Empire. During the 19th century, more territorial acquisitions were made in Europe and Asia. Defeat in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 contributed to the Revolution of 1905, which resulted in the formation of a parliament and other reforms. Repeated devastating defeats of the Russian army in World War I led to widespread rioting in the major cities of the Russian Empire and to the overthrow in 1917 of the imperial household. The communists under Vladimir LENIN seized power soon after and formed the USSR. The brutal rule of Iosif STALIN (1928-53) strengthened communist rule and Russian dominance of the Soviet Union at a cost of tens of millions of lives. The Soviet economy and society stagnated in the following decades until General Secretary Mikhail GORBACHEV (1985-91) introduced glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) in an attempt to modernize communism, but his initiatives inadvertently released forces that by December 1991 splintered the USSR into Russia and 14 other independent republics. Since then, Russia has shifted its post-Soviet democratic ambitions in favor of a centralized semi-authoritarian state in which the leadership seeks to legitimize its rule through managed national elections, populist appeals by President PUTIN, and continued economic growth. -
Colloids in the Hydrothermal-Magmatic Systems of Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands
PROCEEDINGS, 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 11-13, 2019 SGP-TR-214 Colloids in the hydrothermal-magmatic systems of Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands Vladimir I. Belousov, Irina V. Belousova Russia, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Boulevard Piipa 9, Institute of Volcanology and Seismology [email protected] Keywords: Colloids, hydrothermal-magmatic systems, geyserites, silica gel, acidic extrusion, ignimbrites, acid changes, opal rocks, hydrolysis reactions, aluminosilicate minerals, lyophilic sols, leaching, ligands, magma chambers, sulphide colloids. ABSTRACT Metacolloids in active hydrothermal systems began to be investigated in the 1960s. Currently, several hydrothermal-magmatic systems associated with stratovolcanoes have been explored in Kamchatka and the Kuril Islands. The water-volcanic reaction leads to the formation of silicate and sulphide colloids. Silicate colloids are a geological and geochemical factor that changes the permeability of host rocks, the temperature regime, the chemical properties of thermal waters and affects the formation of ore deposits. The accumulation of heat and non-reactive gases under impermeable layers leads to an increase in temperature and is accompanied by partial melting of siliceous rocks with the formation of ignimbrites and foci of acid magmas. 1. INTRODUCTION High-temperature hydrothermal systems are the subsurface convective cells of meteoric water circulating in the Earth's crust to a depth of 5-10 km (Belousov, 1978). The lower part of such cells is overlapped by the crust-mantle convective cell in which the heat and mass transfer is performed by magmatic melts, and the source of thermal energy generation is the upper mantle. According to the data of geological survey, all of the selected geochemical types of thermal waters are interconnected and originate from high-temperature chloride waters. -
Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes
Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes April 1, 2004 Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes April 1, 2004 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................1 1.1 INTEGRATED RESPONSE TO VOLCANIC ASH ..............................1 1.2 DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING ..................................2 1.3 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION ........................2 1.4 DISTRIBUTION AND DISSEMINATION ...................................3 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES ...........................................3 2.1 DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (DHS&EM) . 3 2.2 ALASKA VOLCANO OBSERVATORY (AVO) .................................4 2.2.1 ORGANIZATION .................................................4 2.2.2 GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES ..............................5 2.2.2.1 EARLY ERUPTION PREDICTION, WARNING & CALL-DOWN: SEISMICALLY INSTRUMENTED VOLCANOES ......................................6 2.2.2.1.1 KAMCHATKAN VOLCANIC ERUPTION RESPONSE TEAM (KVERT) . 8 2.2.2.2 SEISMICALLY UNMONITORED VOLCANOES ...........................9 2.2.2.3 UPDATES AND INFORMATION RELEASES .............................9 2.2.2.4 COMMUNICATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES ...........................10 2.2.2.5 LEVEL OF CONCERN COLOR CODE SYSTEM ..........................10 2.2.2.6 DESIGNATION OF AUTHORITY ....................................12 2.3 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE .............................................12 2.3.1 PROCEDURES .................................................12 -
Use of Isotope Techniques to Trace the Origin of Acidic Fluids in Geothermal Systems
IAEA-TECDOC-1448 Use of isotope techniques to trace the origin of acidic fluids in geothermal systems April 2005 IAEA-TECDOC-1448 Use of isotope techniques to trace the origin of acidic fluids in geothermal systems April 2005 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Isotope Hydrology Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria USE OF ISOTOPE TECHNIQUES TO TRACE THE ORIGIN OF ACIDIC FLUIDS IN GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS IAEA, VIENNA, 2005 IAEA-TECDOC-1448 ISBN 92–0–102805–9 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2005 Printed by the IAEA in Austria April 2005 FOREWORD Geothermal energy is an indigenous source of energy and, if used properly, also a renewable one. Many IAEA Member States are currently using these resources either for electric power generation or for direct use of the heat. However, geothermal development involves high risks due to its geological uncertainty, intensive drilling investment and other technical difficulties. Natural waters with pH values lower than 5 found in geothermal areas are called ‘acidic fluids’. The presence of these fluids constrains the development of geothermal resources in many geothermal systems around the globe. Acid wells are either plugged or abandoned. Limited understanding of their origin prevents effective management of many high temperature geothermal reservoirs. This issue was identified as a major problem encountered in geothermal development and management during an advisory group meeting organized by the IAEA and held in Vienna from 29 May to 1 June 1995. At that meeting, the state of the art on this subject was reviewed and research needs identified by a group of 19 experts from 13 Member States. -
Geochemical Studies of Volcanic Rocks from the Northern Part of Kuril-Kamchatka
Geochemical studies of volcanic rocks from the northern part of Kuril-Kamchatka arc: Tectonic and structural Title constraints on the origin and evolution of arc magma Author(s) Bergal-Kuvikas, Olga Citation 北海道大学. 博士(理学) 甲第11991号 Issue Date 2015-09-25 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k11991 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60073 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Bergal-Kuvikas_Olga.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Thesis for Doctor of Philosophy in Petrology and Volcanology research group, Division of Earth and Planetary Science, Department of Natural History Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University Geochemical studies of volcanic rocks from the northern part of Kuril-Kamchatka arc: Tectonic and structural constraints on the origin and evolution of arc magma (クリル・カムチャッカ弧北部の火山岩に関する地球化学的研究: 深部構造が島弧マグマの起源および進化に与える影響について) Bergal-Kuvikas Olga Hokkaido University August 2015 Acknowledgement I am wishing to thank Japanese government for the chance to study at Japan. Scholarship for research students (Monbukagakusho: MEXT) was spent at Hokkaido University under guided by Prof. Mitsuhiro Nakagawa since October 2010 to September 2015. Especially thanks for all members of Petrology and Volcanology research group at Hokkaido University. I am grateful to Dr. Mizuho Amma-Miyasaka, Dr. Akiko Matsumoto, Ms. Ayumi Kosugi, Prof. Takeshi Kuritani for assistance and support in analytical experiences. Thanks for Mr. K. Nakamura for helpful recommendation in making thin sections. My dissertation is a part of Japanese-Russian project of study Klyuchevskoy volcano. I grateful to geologists and volcanologists of this project. For many years cooperation, I gratitude to Dr. Ya. Muravev, Ms. N. Malik, Mr. -
AERMETSG/11 – WP/04 25/11/11 International Civil Aviation
AERMETSG/11 – WP/04 25/11/11 International Civil Aviation Organization Revised CAR/SAM Regional Planning and Implementation Group (GREPECAS) Eleventh Meeting of the GREPECAS Aeronautical Meteorology Subgroup (AERMETSG/11) Lima, Peru, 28 to 30 November 2011 Agenda Item 3: Review the status of implementation of the International Airways Volcano Watch (IAVW) in the CAR/SAM States (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY This working paper presents information on the progress of the International Airways Volcano Watch (IAVW), in accordance with the results of the Fifth and Sixth meetings of the IAVW Operations Group (IAVWOPSG/5 and IAVWOPSG/6), and the implementation status in CAR/SAM States. References Report of the Fifth Meeting of the International Airways Volcano Watch Operations Group (IAVWOPSG/5), 15 to 19 March 2010, Lima, Peru. Report of the Sixth Meeting of the International Airways Volcano Watch Operations Group (IAVWOPSG/6), 19 to 23 September 2011, Dakar, Senegal. Report of the Fifteenth Meeting of the CAR/SAM Regional Planning and Iimplementation Group (GREPECAS/15), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 13 – 17 October 2008. A – Safety C - Environmental Protection and ICAO Strategic Objective: Sustainable Development of Air Transport 1. Introduction 1.1 The IAVWOPSG was established in response to Recommendation 1/22 of the Meteorology (MET) Divisional Meeting (2002), to ensure that the operation and development of the IAVW continue, in order to meet current and evolving operational requirements in a cost effective manner. The Group should also develop proposals for the development of the IAVW in order to ensure the seamless evolution of operational requirements, under ICAO procedures for the amendments to Annex 3.