DOCSLIB.ORG

UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r33f664 Author Fessler, Heidi Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philisophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Heidi Michelle Fessler 2016 © Copyright by Heidi Michelle Fessler 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Transit Corridors and Assyrian Strategy: Case Studies from the 8th-7th Century BCE Southern Levant by Heidi Michelle Fessler Doctor of Philisophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Aaron Alexander Burke, Chair Several modern studies and the Assyrians themselves have claimed not only the extreme military measures but also substantial geo-political impact of Assyrian conquest in the southern Levant; however, examples of Assyrian violence and control are actually underrepresented in the archaeological record. The few scholars that have pointed out this dearth of corroborative data have attributed it to an apathetic attitude adopted by Assyria toward the region during both conquest and political control. I argue in this dissertation that the archaeological record reflects Assyrian military strategy rather than indifference. Data from three case studies, Megiddo, Ashdod, and the Western Negev, suggest that the small number of sites with evidence of destruction and even fewer sites with evidence of Assyrian imperial control are a product of a strategy that allowed Assyria to annex the region with less investment than their annals claim. ii Furthermore, Assyria’s network of imperial outposts monitored international highways in a manner that allowed a small local and foreign population to participate in trade and defense opportunities that ultimately benefited the Assyrian core. iii The dissertation of Heidi Michelle Fessler is approved. Elizabeth F. Carter Sarah P. Morris Aaron Alexander Burke, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2016 iv Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Background of the Problem ........................................................................................................ 2 3. Statement of the Problem and Purpose of the Study................................................................... 9 4. Primary Research Question ....................................................................................................... 10 5. Research Design........................................................................................................................ 11 6. Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................................. 17 6.1 Assyrian Warfare Strategy .................................................................................................. 18 6.2 Assyria and Its Frontiers ..................................................................................................... 22 7. Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 26 8. Overview of Study .................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 2. Assyrian Magidu as a Transit Corridor 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 29 2. Location .................................................................................................................................... 30 3. Texts Relating to Megiddo........................................................................................................ 30 4. Boundaries ................................................................................................................................ 35 5. Brief History of Scholarship ..................................................................................................... 38 6. Survey of Architecture and Material Culture ............................................................................ 41 6.1 Destructions Associated with Tiglath-pileser III 733/2 Campaigns in the Southern Levant ................................................................................................................................... 41 6.2 Abandonment associated with Tiglath-pileser III 733/2 campaigns in the southern Levant ................................................................................................................................... 45 6.3 Assyrian Administrative Architecture ............................................................................ 47 6.4 Local Material Culture Alongside Assyrian Architecture .............................................. 54 6.5 Combined Data ............................................................................................................... 58 6.6 Overview of Sites ............................................................................................................ 59 7. Comparative Data ..................................................................................................................... 63 8. Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 68 9. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 75 v Chapter 3. Assyrian Strategy?: The Province of Ašdudu and the Problem of Ekron 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 77 2. Location .................................................................................................................................... 78 4. Boundaries ................................................................................................................................ 78 3. Texts Relating to Philistia ......................................................................................................... 80 5. Brief History of Scholarship ..................................................................................................... 88 6. Survey of Architecture and Material Culture ............................................................................ 93 6.1 Destructions Linked to Assyrian Campaigns ...................................................................... 94 6.2 Evidence of Settlement Changes during the Time of Assyrian Campaigns ....................... 96 6.3 Philistia in Assyrian Territory ............................................................................................. 97 6.3.1 Ashdod and Its Surroundings ....................................................................................... 98 6.3.2 Nahal Soreq and Ekron ................................................................................................ 99 6.3.3 Area surrounding Tell es Safi/Gath ........................................................................... 100 6.3.4 Ashkelon and Its surroundings................................................................................... 101 6.3.5 Northern Coastal Plain and Northern Shephelah ....................................................... 102 6.4 Assyrian Architecture and Material Culture ..................................................................... 106 6.5 Local Material Culture ...................................................................................................... 108 6.6. Summary .......................................................................................................................... 109 6.7 Combined Data ................................................................................................................. 110 7. Comparative Data ................................................................................................................... 112 8. Analysis................................................................................................................................... 113 9. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 120 Chapter 4. The Western Negev, So-called “Assyrian Fortresses” and “Buffer Zones” 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 121 2. Location .................................................................................................................................. 122 3. Texts Relating to the Western Negev ..................................................................................... 123 4. Location in Provincial System ................................................................................................ 126 5. Brief History of Scholarship ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • INITIATIVE for CUNEIFORM ENCODING PROPOSAL November 1, 2003
    INITIATIVE FOR CUNEIFORM ENCODING PROPOSAL November 1, 2003 [IMPORTANT NOTE: Due to the pressures of time and other considerations this is one of two proposals submitted to the Unicode Technical Committee by the Initiative for Cuneiform Encoding prior to the UTC meeting at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Nov. 4-7, 2003. This is NOT, however, intended as two competing proposals; it is merely insurance to make sure all exigencies are covered before the ICE proposal presentation at UTC. We intend to present a single proposal.] We find ourselves at an historic crux in the history of writing. From our vantage point we can look backwards 5600 years to the beginnings of the world's first writing, cuneiform, and we can look forward into a future where that heritage will be preserved. International computer standards make it possible. Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform is the world's oldest and longest used writing system. The earliest texts appear in Mesopotamia around 3600 BC and the last native cuneiform texts were written around 75 AD. The ancient scribes pressed the ends of their styluses into damp clay in order to write the approximately 800 different syllabic, logographic, or taxographic signs of this complex, poly-valent script. The clay tablets were sun-dried or baked by fire and were thus preserved in the sands of the Near East for millennia. Since the decipherment of Babylonian cuneiform some 150 years ago museums have accumulated perhaps 300,000 tablets written in most of the major languages of the Ancient Near East - Sumerian, Akkadian (Babylonian and Assyrian), Eblaite, Hittite, Hurrian, and Elamite.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Baasha of Ammon
    Baasha of Ammon GARY A. RENDSBURG Cornell University 1lVD'i' 'Xtl1' i1'1::J' i"'~ 1,T The identification of the members of the western coalition who fought Shal­ maneser HI at the battle of Qarqar has engaged Assyriologists since the 19th century. Among the more elusive members of the alliance has been Ba-J-sa miir 1 Ru-bu-bi .KUR A-ma-na-a-a, listed in the Monolith Inscription, column II, line 95. The majority view holds that the toponym A-ma-na-a-a refers to Ammon. the small state located in Transjordan = biblical cammon (Gen. 19:38, etc.). This iden­ tification ,:>riginated among late 19th and early 20th century scholars,2 is repeated in more recent works,3 and appears in standard translations.4 The ~llinority view was first offered by E. Forrer,S who identified the word with Amana, the mountainous region of southern Syria, more specifically the It is my pleasure to thank Peter Machinist and Samuel M. Paley whose helpful suggestions I have incorporated into this article. 1. For the original, see H. C. Rawlinson, The Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia (London, 1870),3: pliltes 7-8. 2. F. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies ? (Leipzig, 1881),294; F. Hommel. Geschichte Babylolliells und Assyriells (Berlin, 1885), 609; C. P. Tiele, Babylollisch·assyrische Geschichte (Gotha, 1886). 201; E. Schrader. Sammlung von assyrischen und babylonischen Textell (Berlin, (889), I: 173; R. W. Rogers, A History of Babylollia and Assyria (New York, 1901),77; H. Winckler, The History of Babylonia and Assyria (New York, 1907),220; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashqelon, Afridar Area O-2: Early Bronze Age IA Remains
    Ḥadashot Arkheologiyot— Excavations and Surveys in Israel 132 Ashqelon, Afridar Area O-2: Early Bronze Age IA Remains Amir Golani and Martin David Pasternak Introduction The excavation was situated within the confines of the Early Bronze Age I settlement of Ashqelon, which extends over a long strip along the coast (length c. 5 km, width 1–2 km; Fig. 1), from Tel Ashqelon in the south to the Barne‘a neighborhood in the north. The present excavation (Area O-2; map ref. 158173–186/620789–918) is one of many that have revealed remains of the EB I occupation in this region (Fig. 1; Golani 2019:9, Table 1.2).1 Within this area, a non-nucleated settlement appears to have existed for almost a millennium. Material culture studies and radiocarbon dating have dated the beginning of this occupation to 3800/3700 BCE, and the abandonment of the settlement to 2900/2800 BCE (Golani 2013: Fig. 2). The ancient topography of the immediate vicinity of the site has been drastically altered due to the ongoing buildup of sand dunes over the last two millennia and the extensive leveling operations of modern development. At the time of the EB I settlement, two long, wide and low kurkar ridges ran parallel to the coastline. In the shallow trough between these ridges, a distinct ecosystem was created, whereby fertile soils and a high water-table created optimal conditions for habitation (Gophna 1997). The position of the ancient settlement, adjacent to the coast, suggests the possible existence of a nearby anchorage. A wide passage in the sand dunes to the east, facilitating access from the inland to the coast, posits the site as a convenient spot for overland and maritime trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanigalbat and the Land Hani
    Arnhem (nl) 2015 – 3 Anatolia in the bronze age. © Joost Blasweiler student Leiden University - [email protected] Hanigal9bat and the land Hana. From the annals of Hattusili I we know that in his 3rd year the Hurrian enemy attacked his kingdom. Thanks to the text of Hattusili I (“ruler of Kussara and (who) reign the city of Hattusa”) we can be certain that c. 60 years after the abandonment of the city of Kanesh, Hurrian armies extensively entered the kingdom of Hatti. Remarkable is that Hattusili mentioned that it was not a king or a kingdom who had attacked, but had used an expression “the Hurrian enemy”. Which might point that formerly attacks, raids or wars with Hurrians armies were known by Hattusili king of Kussara. And therefore the threatening expression had arisen in Hittite: “the Hurrian enemy”. Translation of Gary Beckman 2008, The Ancient Near East, editor Mark W. Chavalas, 220. The cuneiform texts of the annal are bilingual: Babylonian and Nesili (Hittite). Note: 16. Babylonian text: ‘the enemy from Ḫanikalbat entered my land’. The Babylonian text of the bilingual is more specific: “the enemy of Ḫanigal9 bat”. Therefore the scholar N.B. Jankowska1 thought that apparently the Hurrian kingdom Hanigalbat had existed probably from an earlier date before the reign of Hattusili i.e. before c. 1650 BC. Normally with the term Mittani one is pointing to the mighty Hurrian kingdom of the 15th century BC 2. Ignace J. Gelb reported 3 on “the dragomans of the Habigalbatian soldiers/workers” in an Old Babylonian tablet of Amisaduqa, who was a contemporary with Hattusili I.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumerian Lexicon, Version 3.0 1 A
    Sumerian Lexicon Version 3.0 by John A. Halloran The following lexicon contains 1,255 Sumerian logogram words and 2,511 Sumerian compound words. A logogram is a reading of a cuneiform sign which represents a word in the spoken language. Sumerian scribes invented the practice of writing in cuneiform on clay tablets sometime around 3400 B.C. in the Uruk/Warka region of southern Iraq. The language that they spoke, Sumerian, is known to us through a large body of texts and through bilingual cuneiform dictionaries of Sumerian and Akkadian, the language of their Semitic successors, to which Sumerian is not related. These bilingual dictionaries date from the Old Babylonian period (1800-1600 B.C.), by which time Sumerian had ceased to be spoken, except by the scribes. The earliest and most important words in Sumerian had their own cuneiform signs, whose origins were pictographic, making an initial repertoire of about a thousand signs or logograms. Beyond these words, two-thirds of this lexicon now consists of words that are transparent compounds of separate logogram words. I have greatly expanded the section containing compounds in this version, but I know that many more compound words could be added. Many cuneiform signs can be pronounced in more than one way and often two or more signs share the same pronunciation, in which case it is necessary to indicate in the transliteration which cuneiform sign is meant; Assyriologists have developed a system whereby the second homophone is marked by an acute accent (´), the third homophone by a grave accent (`), and the remainder by subscript numerals.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseandmodifiedcuneiformsigns.Pdf
    12000 CUNEIFORM SIGN A 12001 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES A 12002 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES BAD 12003 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES GAN2 TENU 12004 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES HA 12005 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES IGI 12006 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES LAGAR GUNU 12007 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES MUSH 12008 CUNEIFORM SIGN A TIMES SAG 12009 CUNEIFORM SIGN A2 1200A CUNEIFORM SIGN AB 1200B CUNEIFORM SIGN AB GUNU 1200C CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES ASH2 1200D CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES GIN2 1200E CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES GAL 1200F CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES GAN2 TENU 12010 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES HA 12011 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES IMIN 12012 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES LAGAB 12013 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES SHESH 12014 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES SIG7 12015 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB TIMES U PLUS U PLUS U 12016 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 12017 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES ASHGAB 12018 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES BALAG 12019 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES BI 1201A CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES DUG 1201B CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES GAN2 TENU 1201C CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES GUD 1201D CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES KAD3 1201E CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES LA 1201F CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES ME PLUS EN 12020 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES NE 12021 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES SHA3 12022 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES SIG7 12023 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES SILA3 12024 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES TAK4 12025 CUNEIFORM SIGN AB2 TIMES U2 12026 CUNEIFORM SIGN AD 12027 CUNEIFORM SIGN AK 12028 CUNEIFORM SIGN AK TIMES ERIN2 12029 CUNEIFORM SIGN AK TIMES SAL PLUS GISH 1202A CUNEIFORM SIGN AK TIMES SHITA PLUS GISH 1202B CUNEIFORM SIGN AL 1202C CUNEIFORM SIGN
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Graninger, Late Argeads in Thrace: Religious Perspectives
    The Ancient History Bulletin VOLUME THIRTY-ONE: 2017 NUMBERS 3-4 Edited by: Timothy Howe òEdward Anson ò Michael Fronda David Hollander òJoseph Roisman ò John Vanderspoel Pat Wheatley ò Sabine Müller òAlex McAuley Catalina Balmacedaò Charlotte Dunn ISSN 0835-3638 ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Volume 31 (2017) Numbers 3-4 Edited by: Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Assistant Editor: Charlotte Dunn Editorial correspondents Elizabeth Baynham, Hugh Bowden, Franca Landucci Gattinoni, Alexander Meeus, Kurt Raaflaub, P.J. Rhodes, Robert Rollinger, Victor Alonso Troncoso Contents of volume thirty-one Numbers 3-4 70 Timothy Doran, Nabis of Sparta: Heir to Agis IV and Kleomenes III? 92 Christopher Tuplin, The Great King, his god(s) and intimations of divinity. The Achaemenid hinterland of ruler cult? 112 Michael Kleu, Philip V, the Selci-Hoard and the supposed building of a Macedonian fleet in Lissus 120 Denver Graninger, Late Argeads in Thrace: Religious Perspectives NOTES TO CONTRIBUTORS AND SUBSCRIBERS The Ancient History Bulletin was founded in 1987 by Waldemar Heckel, Brian Lavelle, and John Vanderspoel. The board of editorial correspondents consists of Elizabeth Baynham (University of Newcastle), Hugh Bowden (Kings College, London), Franca Landucci Gattinoni (Università Cattolica, Milan), Alexander Meeus (University of Leuven), Kurt Raaflaub (Brown University), P.J. Rhodes (Durham University), Robert Rollinger (Universität Innsbruck), Victor Alonso Troncoso (Universidade da Coruña) AHB is currently edited by: Timothy Howe (Senior Editor: [email protected]), Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel and Pat Wheatley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sling and the Stone on War in the 21St Century 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE SLING AND THE STONE ON WAR IN THE 21ST CENTURY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Thomas X Hammes | 9780760324073 | | | | | The Sling and the Stone On War in the 21st Century 1st edition PDF Book Several could fit into a pouch and a single slinger could produce a terrorizing barrage. Boulder, Colorado: Paladin Press. Some cradles have a hole or slit that allows the material to wrap around the projectile slightly, thereby holding it more securely. In addition, leaden sling-bullets are small and difficult to see in flight. Changes in Society. Show More. A graduate of the U. Suitable ammunition is frequently from a river. Edition: First. Derzeit nicht auf Lager. In this account, the shepherd David persuades Saul to let him fight Goliath on behalf of the Israelites. ThriftBooks via United States. Hammes contends that we are engaged in a new form of warfareth Generation War 4GW. Insurgents are patient. The remains are broken into three sections. Iraq HighTech versus FourthGeneration. It seems to have been a heavy dart flung from a leather sling. Livy also mentions the most famous of ancient skillful slingers: the people of the Balearic Islands , who often worked as mercenaries. Pages are clean, text has no markings, binding is sound. Hammes increasingly becomes: Anti- technology Anti- Israeli Anti-Reality Anti -Logic Though some of his insights are remarkable and straight to the point there tends to be a strong undercurrent of dissatisfaction and pessimism. Supplemental materials are not guaranteed with any used book purchases. About Our booksellers For the press Media mentions. There is the greater reason for instructing all troops, without exception, in this exercise, as the sling cannot be reckoned any encumbrance, and often is of the greatest service, especially when they are obliged to engage in stony places, to defend a mountain or an eminence, or to repulse an enemy at the attack of a castle or city.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah." Israel and Empire: a Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism
    "The Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah." Israel and Empire: A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism. Perdue, Leo G., and Warren Carter.Baker, Coleman A., eds. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015. 37–68. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 1 Oct. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567669797.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 1 October 2021, 16:38 UTC. Copyright © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 The Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah I. Historical Introduction1 When the installation of a new monarch in the temple of Ashur occurs during the Akitu festival, the Sangu priest of the high god proclaims when the human ruler enters the temple: Ashur is King! Ashur is King! The ruler now is invested with the responsibilities of the sovereignty, power, and oversight of the Assyrian Empire. The Assyrian Empire has been described as a heterogeneous multi-national power directed by a superhuman, autocratic king, who was conceived of as the representative of God on earth.2 As early as Naram-Sin of Assyria (ca. 18721845 BCE), two important royal titulars continued and were part of the larger titulary of Assyrian rulers: King of the Four Quarters and King of All Things.3 Assyria began its military advances west to the Euphrates in the ninth century BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Conciliation.Ccmmg3sionfor Paiestine
    UNITED NATIONS CONCILIATION.CCMMG3SIONFOR PAIESTINE RESTRICTEb Com,Tech&'Add; 1 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH APPENDIX J$ NON - JlXWISHPOPULATION WITHIN THE BOUNDARXESHELD BY THE ISRAEL DBFENCEARMY ON X5.49 AS ON 1;4-,45 IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE PALESTINE GOVERNMENT VILLAGE STATISTICS, APRIL 1945. CONTENTS Pages SUMMARY..,,... 1 ACRE SUB DISTRICT . , , . 2 - 3 SAPAD II . c ., * ., e .* 4-6 TIBERIAS II . ..at** 7 NAZARETH II b b ..*.*,... 8 II - 10 BEISAN l . ,....*. I 9 II HATFA (I l l ..* a.* 6 a 11 - 12 II JENIX l ..,..b *.,. J.3 TULKAREM tt . ..C..4.. 14 11 JAFFA I ,..L ,r.r l b 14 II - RAMLE ,., ..* I.... 16 1.8 It JERUSALEM .* . ...* l ,. 19 - 20 HEBRON II . ..r.rr..b 21 I1 22 - 23 GAZA .* l ..,.* l P * If BEERSHEXU ,,,..I..*** 24 SUMMARY OF NON - JEWISH'POPULATION Within the boundaries held 6~~the Israel Defence Army on 1.5.49 . AS ON 1.4.45 Jrr accordance with-. the Palestine Gp~ernment Village ‘. Statistics, April 1945, . SUB DISmICT MOSLEMS CHRISTIANS OTHERS TOTAL ACRE 47,290 11,150 6,940 65,380 SAFAD 44,510 1,630 780 46,920 TJBERIAS 22,450 2,360 1,290 26,100 NAZARETH 27,460 Xl, 040 3 38,500 BEISAN lT,92o 650 20 16,590 HAXFA 85,590 30,200 4,330 120,520 JENIN 8,390 60 8,450 TULJSAREM 229310, 10 22,320' JAFFA 93,070 16,300 330 1o9p7oo RAMIIEi 76,920 5,290 10 82,220 JERUSALEM 34,740 13,000 I 47,740 HEBRON 19,810 10 19,820 GAZA 69,230 160 * 69,390 BEERSHEBA 53,340 200 10 53,m TOT$L 621,030 92,060 13,710 7z6,8oo .
    [Show full text]