DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Works of Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Works of Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić “Eastern Europe”, “Balkanism” and “European-ness” in the works of Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić by Anamaria Remete Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Creative Media Arts and Design Murdoch University 2019 I, Anamaria Remete confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. i Abstract The thesis proposes a critical reading of the discourse of “Europe” and “European-ness”. I argue eastern European writers have internalized the imagery reproduced by these discourses in which “Eastern Europe” is cast as an inferior Other. With a postcolonial critique in mind I propose a critical reading of the works of two contemporary east European writers and intellectuals, Romanian Gabriel Liiceanu and Croatian Slavenka Drakulić. Intellectuals in eastern Europe have had a curious mix of responses to the discourse of “Eastern Europe” from acceptance, resistance, adaptation, transformation to rejection of “Europe”, “Eastern Europe” and “Balkanism”. They have crafted distinctly-new sites of resistance and post-socialist subjectivities, modes of inhabiting and belonging to contested geographies that previous paradigms have failed to properly capture. I argue that Liiceanu and Drakulić’s writings reveal the contested and enduring relationship that east European intellectuals have had with the idea of “Europe”. Their accounts complicate the image of a neatly divided Europe, and challenge the idea of a coherent and stable East and West. Liiceanu and Drakulić participate as agents in negotiating the idea of “Europe”. These texts are spaces in which intellectuals and political elites imagine Europe and their place in the world, articulate an entirely distinct vocabulary of belonging and exclusion. Discussing their writing provides an opportunity to challenge the construction of the idea of “Europe”. ii Table of contents Declaration i Abstract ii Table of contents iii Acknowledgements vii Chapter I: Background and Problematizing “Europe” 1 1 Internalization of Otherness 8 2 “Nesting Orientalism”, historical determinism and uneasy identifications 12 3 Theoretical basis 14 4 Chapter outline 17 Chapter II Theoretical framework. Establishing a Working Relationship between the Posts: Postcolonial critique and Postcommunist Studies 22 1 Introduction to terminology 22 2 Postcolonial critique screening out Eastern Europe 27 3 The rejection of postcolonial critique in Eastern Europe 29 4 Engagements with the post-colonial paradigm in postcommunist studies 33 Chapter III The modern European imagination, “European-ness” and Geo-graphing “Eastern Europe” 53 1 “Europe” and Civilization 55 2 The myth of unity and the reality of conflict 58 3 The lack of a real tradition of a shared sense of belonging to “Europe” 62 iii 3.1 The idea of “Europe” as Respublica Christiana 62 3.2 “Europe” as the “Age of Discovery” 63 3.3 “Europe” as Modernity 64 3.4 “Europe” in the Age of Angst 65 3.5 “Europe” between the capitalist West and the socialist East 66 4 Creating the fiction of “Europe” 67 5 “Europe”, History and Tradition 68 6 The idea of “civilization”, uses of “civilization” as a conceptual tool and as discourses of power 69 7 The Modern European imagination, naturalization of knowledge, critical geopolitics, the produced nature of space 75 8 A new understanding of space. Implications for time and history 77 9 Renaissance understanding of linear perspective influenced Cartesian Perspectivalism 78 10 Beyond “Eastern Europe” and “Balkanism”: Subjectivity in eastern Europe 83 11 Mapping out and problematizing “Eastern Europe” and “the Balkans” 85 12 Uneasy self-identifications in the “real” eastern Europe 92 13 Historical determinism and fragility as modes of being in eastern Europe 95 14 Eastern Europe as “in-between-ness”. The Borderland as an east European manner of being in the world 97 Chapter IV The Cultural Field in Socialist Yugoslavia and Romania. Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić's Positioning as Intellectuals 100 1 Characteristics and specificity of intellectual activity and the cultural field in 103 socialist societies iv 2 The cultural field in the Romanian and the Yugoslav society during communism 107 3 Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić as intellectuals 110 Chapter V Reading Slavenka Drakulić and Gabriel Liiceanu: writing the self in eastern Europe 122 1 Subjectivities 123 1.1 Subjectivity and identification 128 1.2 Divided selves 130 2 Life writing. The making of the Self and Representation 152 3 The problem of representation in writing 158 4 Symbolic geography: Dreaming of “Europe” and escaping “Eastern Europe” 165 4.1 Home as Shame. Motherland and Fatherland 166 4.1.1 Home as Motherland – Cotroceni neighbourhood 167 4.1.2 Home as fatherland – “patria mica” 169 5 Concluding remarks 178 Chapter VI Reading Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić. Writing about Memory in Eastern Europe 180 1 Divided memory – Western versus Eastern – Hot versus Cold memory 181 1.1 The need to remember after the fall of communism 187 1.2 Writing about the past. Gabriel Liiceanu and Slavenka Drakulić 188 2 Memory writing in Gabriel Liiceanu 189 2.1The memory of communism as trauma 190 2.2 The memory of communism as victimhood 193 2.3 The memory of communism as occupation 196 v 2.4 Nostalgia for the pre-regime 199 3 Memory in Slavenka Drakulić’s writing 201 3.1 The memory of the Shoah 203 3.2 The memory of communism as a walking museum 204 3.3 The memory of war 207 Chapter VII Reading Slavenka Drakulić and Gabriel Liiceanu. Resistance and Accommodation 211 1 Problematizing “dissidence” 211 2 Accommodation with power 214 3 Re-thinking the concept of resistance 219 4 Resistance through the Aesthetic or the autonomy of culture and its limits 222 5 A time for ethics 231 6 Antipolitics and “Living in truth” 232 7 Objects speak 241 Conclusion 245 Bibliography 254 vi Acknowledgements This thesis has been gestating for the past four and a half years, and during this time I have benefited from the guidance and help of many people. The biggest thanks go to my supervisors, Vijay Mishra, Kathryn Trees and Anne Surma. Professor Vijay Mishra has patiently guided me and endured my twisted and idiosyncratic English writing, generously sharing his comprehensive knowledge of Postcolonial critique and literary analysis. With great dedication he has followed my work for four and a half years. I am sure that his support and suggestions have dramatically improved the quality of this thesis. Having joined the supervision team in my final year Kathryn has had the toughest of tasks, that of understanding, harnessing and gearing my efforts to ensure the completion of this thesis. No doubt, that required great courage. Kathryn’s dedication and uncompromising quest for quality have been most inspiring. Finally, it is with great appreciation that I thank Anne Surma for her generous help and guidance during that crucial initial candidature period. I would like to thank Helena Kadmos for both mentoring, companionship and for a unique combination of wisdom and pure kindness. I thank her for being there in all the right moments. My thanks also go to Lisa Edelsward and Philip Carl Salzman for their support over the years. They both have cemented in me a sense of admiration and pure joy for the quest. I hope not to have betrayed too much the anthropologist's hat by exchanging it for that of the historian’s. This thesis has been facilitated by a generous three and a half-year MIPS scholarship awarded by Murdoch University to whom I also thank for their financial support. Last but not least, I dedicate this work to my husband Simone, my harbour in a sea of restless ideas. I am certain that without his love, support and countenance this work would not have been possible. vii Chapter I Background and Problematizing “Europe” What is meant by the name “Europe”? There are multiple answers to this question. First, Europe is a continent, a geographical place. Secondly, the name refers to the political and economic alliance that was once the “European Community” but is now the European Union. Thirdly, “Europe” invokes the mythological Greek character Europa. These, and further meanings of Europe, coalesce into a single atemporal monolithic understanding in documents such as the “Declaration on European Identity” drafted at the 1973 Copenhagen EU Summit. In this Declaration a variety of traditions and heritages are subsumed and collapsed into a single “framework of European civilization”.1 This process has resulted in an enduring and problematic legacy2 of meaning- construction and an idea of “Europe”.3 The geographical representation of countries into “West” and “East” is supposedly “objective”. Influential writers such as Voltaire and other Enlightenment thinkers have used “Western” and “Eastern” to differentiate between people from the “West” and the “East”. In this process the “West” became a signifier for “civilization” while the “East” became a signifier for a land discovered by the enlightened “West”. In this relationship the “East” became the object as seen in the Republic of Letters.4 Throughout history the binary “West”/”East” has taken various guises. 1 European Union, European Political Co-operation (PEC), ‘Declaration on European Identity’, Federal Republic of Germany, Bonn, 1988, Paragraph 3. Fifth Edition Press and Information Office. 2 See Paul Valéry, ‘La Crise de l’Esprit,’ Variété I, Letters (Paris: 1919). I further elaborate on the intellectual engagements with the idea of “Europe” in Chapter III. 3 For a critical reading of the idea of “Europe” as a constructed concept see Gerard Delanty, Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1995); Anthony Pagden, The Idea of Europe. From Antiquity to the European Union, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002); Bo Stråth, Europe and the Other. Europe as the Other, (New York: Peter Lang, 2000).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romania's Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates About the Recent Past
    ROMANIA'S CULTURAL WARS : Intellectual Debates about the Recent Past Irina Livezeanu University of Pittsburgh The National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h 910 17`" Street, N.W . Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 2000 6 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Contractor : University of Pittsburgh Principal Investigator: Irina Livezeanu Council Contract Number : 816-08 Date : March 27, 2003 Copyright Informatio n Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funde d through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicat e and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract o r Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER's own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows : (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of th e United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United State s Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale . * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by th e National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available b y the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Trainin g Act of 1983, as amended) .
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANIAN IDENTITY and CULTURAL POLITICS UNDER CEAU§ESCU: an EXAMPLE from PHILOSOPHY1 Katherine Verdery
    ROMANIAN IDENTITY AND CULTURAL POLITICS UNDER CEAU§ESCU: AN EXAMPLE FROM PHILOSOPHY1 Katherine Verdery Studies of intellectuals, their relation to power, and their role in shaping social ideologies' occupy an important place in twentieth-century social science (e.g., Mannheim 1955, Gramsci 1971, Shils 1958, Gouldner 1979, Foucault 1978 and 1980, Bourdieu 1975 and 1988, Konri.\d and Szelenyi 1979, Bauman 1987). While earlier writings (such as Shils 1958 and Coser 1965) treatec;i intellectual activity as "free-floating" and as relatively independent of political interest, the consensus of the 1970s and 1980s emphasizes, rather, that intellectual production is situated, embedded in political and social relations. Different theorists have different views concerning the political character of scientific findings and scholarly debates. Some emphasize the ways in which knowledge develops practices that contribute to subjection (e.g., Bauman 1987, Foucault 1978); others focus on the politics that occur within afield of intellectual activity and on how that field is tied to political and eco~omic processes in. the society as a whole (e.g., .Abbott 1988, Bourdieu 1975, 1988). Still others examine how the discourses of "intellectuals build up ideological premises that either construct or challenge social hegemonies (e.g., Simmonds-Duke 1987). This essay, and the study of which it forms a part (Verdery 1991), follow the third of these routes. My objective is to investigate how intellectual activity in Romania under ceau~escu contributed to reproducing
    [Show full text]
  • “The Double Bind” of 1989: Reinterpreting Space, Place, and Identity in Postcommunist Women’S Literature
    “THE DOUBLE BIND” OF 1989: REINTERPRETING SPACE, PLACE, AND IDENTITY IN POSTCOMMUNIST WOMEN’S LITERATURE BY JESSICA LYNN WIENHOLD-BROKISH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctorial Committee: Associate Professor Lilya Kaganovsky, Chair; Director of Research Professor Nancy Blake Professor Harriet Murav Associate Professor Anke Pinkert Abstract This dissertation is a comparative, cross-cultural exploration of identity construction after 1989 as it pertains to narrative setting and the creation of literary place in postcommunist women’s literature. Through spatial analysis the negotiation between the unresolvable bind of a stable national and personal identity and of a flexible transnational identity are discussed. Russian, German, and Croatian writers, specifically Olga Mukhina, Nina Sadur, Monika Maron, Barbara Honigmann, Angela Krauß, Vedrana Rudan, Dubravka Ugrešić, and Slavenka Drakulić, provide the material for an examination of the proliferation of female writers and the potential for recuperative literary techniques after 1989. The project is organized thematically with chapters dedicated to apartments, cities, and foreign lands, focusing on strategies of identity reconstruction after the fall of socialism. ii To My Family, especially Mom, Dad, Jeffrey, and Finnegan iii Table of Contents Chapter One: Introduction: “We are, from this perspective,
    [Show full text]
  • Fundaţia Culturală COLUMNA
    cu daţia ltura un lă f ttârgu-jiuârgu-jiu C O L U M N A CCENTRULENTRUL DDEE CCULTURĂULTURĂ ŞŞII AARTĂRTĂ REVISTĂ TRIMESTRIALĂ DE LITERATURĂ ȘI ARTĂ ””CONSTANTINCONSTANTIN BBRÂNCUŞI”RÂNCUŞI” TTÂRGU-JIUÂRGU-JIU anul XIII nr.63/1, 2011 ISSN 1453-7982 critică şi cronică: Horia Muntenuș Lazăr Popescu Vasile Ponea Ion Trancău eseuri şi studii: Zenovie Cârlugea George Dumitru Ioana Nichifor Frățilă Vasile Fuiorea Victor Constantin Măruțoiu Ion Mocioi Ion Popescu - Brădiceni Al. Florin Țene poezie: Mircea Bârsilă Gelu Birău evocări: : Virgil Carianopol : grafi că - pictură Ion Căpruciu Ion Predoșanu traduceri Valeriu Butulescu Viorel Surdoiu Gabriel Chifu Dumitru Dănău Marian Dobreanu Eugen Evu Viorel Gârbaciu EUROPA DIN ADÂNCURI – ÎNTRE REALITATE ŞI REDEFINIRE – Mircea Liviu Goga Ioan Lascu O civilizaţie se defi neşte în relaţia constructivă cu alte civilizaţii şi în cadrul identităţii acestora. Florea Miu Profesorul Federico Mayor ne propune următoarea refl exie: „Civilizaţia este fructul îmbogăţirii Andrei Novac reciproce a culturilor, implicând toleranţa, căci deschiderea spre ceilalţi este condiţia creativităţii Emil Paraschivoiu şi dezvoltării spirituale?” Ion Trancău Din această declaraţie, deducem imperativul diversităţii, ca factor determinant al conceptului mai larg despre civilizaţie. Prin ceea ce este specifi c, cultura şi educaţia se afi rmă, se dezvoltă anulând pericolul globali- zării, care există şi... pândeşte. proză: În diversitatea lor, cultura şi educaţia unui grup, sau a unui popor, reprezintă „credinţa, sensibi- Aurel Antonie litatea facultăţilor şi eforturilor acelui popor” (Johan Gotfried Herder). Silviu Doinaș Popescu „Gândirea unică” alterează noţiunea de celălalt, impunând integrarea culturilor într-un tot in- form şi agresiv. În demersul cercetării, al sociologiei şi cunoaşterii, cultura defi neşte „sufl etul poporului” matricea unică şi de neînlocuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr. 3(8) Anul III EX PONTO TEXT/IMAGINE/METATEXT Nr
    iulie - septembrie 2005 Nr. 3(8) anul III EX PONTO TEXT/IMAGINE/METATEXT Nr. 3 (8), (Anul III), iulie-septembrie, 2005 EX PONTO text/imagine/metatext Revist` trimestrial` publicat` de Editura EX PONTO [i S.C. INFCON S.A. Director: IOAN POPIßTEANU Director general: PAUL PRODAN Apare sub egida Uniunii Scriitorilor din Rom~nia, cu sprijinul financiar al Ministerului Culturii [i Cultelor [i sus]inerea Filialei „Dobrogea“ a Uniunii Scriitorilor din Rom~nia, Direc]iilor Jude]ene pentru Cultur`, Culte [i Patrimoniul Cultur al Na]ional Constan]a [i Tulcea [i Universit`]ii „Ovidius“ Constan]a Redac]ia: Redactor [ef: OVIDIU DUNåREANU Redactor [ef adjunct: NICOLAE ROTUND Redactori: ANGELO MITCHIEVICI, DAN PERßA, ILEANA MARIN (S.U.A.) Prezentare grafic`: CONSTANTIN GRIGORU¥å Tehnoredactare: AURA DUMITRACHE Corectur`, schimb de publica]ii [i desfacere: SORIN ROßCA Colegiul: SORIN ALEXANDRESCU, Acad. SOLOMON MARCUS, CONSTANTIN NOVAC, NICOLAE MOTOC, RADU CÇRNECI, VICTOR CIUPINå, ENACHE PUIU, ION BITOLEANU, STOICA LASCU, ADINA CIUGUREANU, FLOREN¥A MARINESCU, AXENIA HOGEA, IOAN POPIßTEANU, OLIMPIU VLADIMIROV Revista Ex Ponto g`zduie[te opiniile, oric~t de diverse, ale colaboratorilor. Responsabilitatea pentru con]inutul fiec`rui text apar]ine \n exclusivitate autorului. Redac]ia: Bd. Mamaia nr. 126, Constan]a, 900527; Tel./fax: 0241 / 616880; email: library@bcu ovidius.ro Administra]ia: Aleea Prof. Murgoci nr. 1, Constan]a, 900132; Tel./fax: 0241 / 580527 / 585627 Revista se difuzeaz`: – \n Constan]a, prin re]eaua chio[curilor „Cuget Liber” S.A. – \n Bucure[ti, prin Centrul de Difuzare a Presei de la Muzeul Literaturii Rom~ne Revista Ex Ponto este membr` a A.R.I.E.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato: Philosophy As Politics
    Sorin Bocancea / Plato: Philosophy as Politics Plato: Philosophy as Politics Sorin Bocancea “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Abstract brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals One of the elements that obstruct the access to a presumed meaning of Plato’s doctrine is the use of the conventional meaning of the term “philosophia”, that is the signification that has prevailed after Aristotle. In order to eliminate this anachronism, it is necessary to review the meanings that the term had before Plato and in his dialogues. We should see that for the founder of the Academy philosophy was not a purely contemplative act, but one that was concerned with politics. In his opinion, philosophy as dialectics was the art of contentious reasoning, of continuous and everlasting validation of true opinions. This method does not lead to truth; it substitutes the truth – and all this happens in the field of language. Thus philosophy is also a way to govern and make politics. Ergo the expression “philosopher king” does not unite terms that were previously opposites, but rather expresses the need that this model of making politics takes the place of the already established political power. Key words: Plato, politics, dialectics, power, wisdom Among the elements that are considered to place Plato’s texts in a dark area, we could mention the following: the long period of time elapsed since their writing, the intermediate means by which we access them, philosophical culture, and our intentions and prejudices in our approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • SVEUČILIŠTE U RIJECI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET Nikol Bali
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the University of Rijeka SVEUČILIŠTE U RIJECI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET Nikol Bali Tijelo kao trauma u romanima Slavenke Drakulić (DIPLOMSKI RAD) Rijeka, rujan 2016. SVEUČILIŠTE U RIJECI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET Odsjek za kroatistiku Nikol Bali Matični broj: 0009058911 Tijelo kao trauma u romanima Slavenke Drakulić DIPLOMSKI RAD Diplomski studij: Hrvatski jezik i književnost/ Filozofija Mentorica: dr. sc. Danijela Marot Kiš Rijeka, rujan 2016. Sadržaj 1. Uvod ........................................................................................................ 3 2. Slavenka Drakulić ................................................................................... 6 3. Povijest i problematika feminizma .......................................................... 7 3.1. Žena – opozicija muškarcu; drugo ....................................................................... 7 3.2. Rod kao tvorevina društva ................................................................................... 9 3.3. Problem identiteta .............................................................................................. 11 3.4. Trauma ............................................................................................................... 14 4. Kao da me nema .................................................................................... 17 4.1. Nadzor i kazna ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Open Society in the Western Balkans, 1991–2011
    BUILDING OPEN S OPEN BUILDING BUILDING OPEN SOCIETY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS O CIETY IN THE IN WESTERN WESTERN BALKANS 19 91 – 2 0 11 BUILDING OPEN SOCIETY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS 1991–2011 The story of the Open Society Foundations’ activities during a time of transformation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia © 2011 by the Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. Published by the Open Society Foundations 400 West 59th Street New York, New York 10019 USA www.soros.org Produced by the Office of Communications Laura Silber, Director of Public Affairs Ari Korpivaara, Director of Publications [email protected] The Historical Highlights and Foundation Activities sections of this report were prepared by the Open Society foundations in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, the Open Society Foundations programs, and Beka Vučo, regional director for the Western Balkans. The Open Society Foundations commissioned the articles in this report. The Sarajevo Notebooks excerpts are reprinted with the permission of that journal. Articles Editor Chuck Sudetic Report Editors Ari Korpivaara, William Kramer, Laura Silber, Beka Vučo Photography Editor Pamela Chen Designer Jeanne Criscola | Criscola Design Printer GHP Media, Inc. Cover photographs FRonT covER: Mostar’s Old Bridge, originally built in 1566, was destroyed in 1993 and rebuilt in 2004 when this photograph was taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Field, Networks, and Reputation Economy in Romania After 1989
    STUDIA UBB SOCIOLOGIA, 64 (LXIV), 2, 2019, pp. 109-140 DOI: 10.2478/subbs-2019-0012 INTELLECTUAL FIELD, NETWORKS, AND REPUTATION ECONOMY IN ROMANIA AFTER 1989 MARIUS LAZĂR1 ABSTRACT. In this article, I analyse the transformations of the Romanian post-communist intellectual elites, using as a case study the disputes in the cultural press in Romania from 2002 to 2004, disagreements that influenced the repositioning of the Romanian public intellectuals through ideological alignments. Those debates gave birth afterwards to a cohesive Conservative pole and to anti-conservative tendencies of diverse political orientations, which constitutes the origin of the current divisions of the intellectual space. The analysis combines the Bourdieusian perspective on the social field and the theory of social networks with the purpose to formulate a hypothesis concerning the competitions meant to produce and preserve the prestige of the status groups in the social space that generate conflicting ideological positions. It outlines an alternative form of reassessing the “reputation economy” outside the space of the commodity exchange economy, starting instead with symbolic exchanges. The study describes the social rationale behind status production, as a source of strategies for maintaining dominant positions in a social field. Keywords: intellectuals, social field, social networks, reputation economy, Romania after 1989 Introduction The present study aims to analyse the changes in the positioning of the Romanian public intellectuals that occurred at the
    [Show full text]
  • Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe
    Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe Series Editor Catharina Raudvere Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark This series explores the relationship between the modern history and pres- ent of South-East Europe and the long imperial past of the region. This approach aspires to offer a more nuanced understanding of the concepts of modernity and change in this region, from the nineteenth century to the present day. Titles focus on changes in identity, self-representation and cultural expressions in light of the huge pressures triggered by the interac- tion between external influences and local and regional practices. The books cover three significant chronological units: the decline of empires and their immediate aftermath, authoritarian governance during the twen- tieth century, and recent uses of history in changing societies in South- East Europe today. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/15829 Cristina A. Bejan Intellectuals and Fascism in Interwar Romania The Criterion Association Cristina A. Bejan Duke University Durham, NC, USA ISSN 2523-7985 ISSN 2523-7993 (electronic) Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe ISBN 978-3-030-20164-7 ISBN 978-3-030-20165-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20165-4 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Free Europe in Paris
    Radio Free Europe in Paris: the Paradoxes of an Ethereal Opposition by Ioana Macrea-Toma Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Constantin Iordachi Second Reader: Professor Istvan Rev CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 Statement of copyright: “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any copies such made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author”. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This paper explores, interprets and contributes to the studies regarding Radio Free Europe in a cold War context. By focusing on the Romanian Department of RFE and further on to Monica Lovinescu’s cultural broadcasts we intend to provide new insights about a type of cultural liberal advocacy framed by an international context and a local intellectual tradition. By resorting to communication theory, intellectual history and socio-history of intellectuals we will place Monica Lovinescu’s message within an intellectual historical interaction which is responsible for the establishment of a literary canon and for the present discourse about the past. A concentric contextualization will gradually introduce our case study, repositioning it into history after a classicized solemn locating it on a transcendental pedestal. The elements of novelty of our undertaking are multifold: it provides factual information about a phenomenon only personally evoked, it applies a complex set of theoretical methodologies and last, but not least, it uses a comparative comprehensive historical approach in order to discard ethical, Manichean or self-centered visions about the Communist period.
    [Show full text]
  • Însemnări Pe Blog (2011)
    Laszlo Alexandru ÎNSEMN ĂRI PE BLOG (2011) LASZLO Alexandru s-a n ăscut în Cluj, la 04.05.1966. Absolvent al Facult ăţ ii de Filologie a Universit ăţ ii “Babe ş-Bolyai” Cluj (1989), cu specializarea limba şi literatura român ă – limba şi literatura italian ă. Profesor de italian ă la Colegiul Na ţional “George Bari ţiu” din Cluj (din 1992). Doctor în Filologie al Universit ăţ ii “Babe ş-Bolyai” (1999). Director al Funda ţiei Culturale “Amici” Cluj (din 1996). Director al revistei româno-italiene Amici (1996-1997). Director al revistei culturale poliglote E-Leonardo (din 2003). A publicat articole, studii literare, eseuri, polemici şi traduceri în reviste culturale din România (Bucure şti, Cluj, Oradea, Ia şi, Sibiu, Tîrgu Mure ş, Tîrgu Jiu, Br ăila), din Statele Unite (New York şi California), din Israel (Tel Aviv), din Germania (Dietzenbach), din Italia (Roma). Cărţi: A. Literatura român ă: 1. Între Icar şi Anteu , polemici, Cluj, Ed. Dacia, 1996. 2. Orient Expres , polemici, Cluj, Ed. Dacia, 1999. 3. Grîul şi neghina , polemici şi alte eseuri, Chi şin ău, Ed. Ştiin ţa, 2002. 4. Criticul literar Nicolae Manolescu , studiu academic, Cluj, Ed. Dacia, 2003 (edi ţia a doua, rev ăzut ă şi ad ăugit ă, 2009). 5. Vorbind (cu Gheorghe Grigurcu şi Ovidiu Pecican), Cluj, Ed. Limes, 2004. 6. Toate pînzele sus! , polemici, Cluj, Ed. Grinta, 2005. 7. Viceversa! , polemici pro şi contra lui Paul Goma, Timi şoara, Ed. Bastion, 2009. 8. Muzeul figurilor de cear ă, polemici, Pite şti, Ed. Paralela 45, 2009. 9. Via ţa de zi cu zi.
    [Show full text]