DOCSLIB.ORG

Global-Peace-Index-2018-2.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global-Peace-Index-2018-2.Pdf Quantifying Peace and its Benefits The Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank dedicated to shifting the world’s focus to peace as a positive, achievable, and tangible measure of human well-being and progress. IEP achieves its goals by developing new conceptual frameworks to define peacefulness; providing metrics for measuring peace; and uncovering the relationships between business, peace and prosperity as well as promoting a better understanding of the cultural, economic and political factors that create peace. IEP is headquartered in Sydney, with offices in New York, The Hague, Mexico City and Brussels. It works with a wide range of partners internationally and collaborates with intergovernmental organisations on measuring and communicating the economic value of peace. For more information visit www.economicsandpeace.org Please cite this report as: Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Peace Index 2018: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney, June 2018. Available from: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (accessed Date Month Year). Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Key Findings 4 RESULTS 5 Highlights 6 2018 Global Peace Index rankings 8 Regional overview 12 Improvements & deteriorations 19 TRENDS 23 Ten year trends in the Global Peace Index 26 100 year trends in peace 32 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE 45 Results 46 The macroeconomic impact of peace 52 POSITIVE PEACE 59 What is Positive Peace? 60 Trends in Positive Peace 65 What precedes a change in peacefulness? 69 Positive Peace and the economy 73 APPENDICES 77 Appendix A: GPI Methodology 78 Appendix B: GPI indicator sources, definitions & scoring criteria 82 Appendix C: GPI Domain scores 90 Appendix D: Economic cost of violence 93 GLOBAL PEACE INDEX 2018 | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the twelfth edition of the Global Peace Index Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq, and Somalia comprise (GPI), which ranks 163 independent states and the remaining least peaceful countries. territories according to their level of peacefulness. Produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace Europe, the world’s most peaceful region, recorded a (IEP), the GPI is the world’s leading measure of global deterioration for the third straight year. It deteriorated peacefulness. This report presents the most across all three GPI domains and eleven indicators, comprehensive data-driven analysis to-date on trends most notably on the intensity of internal conflict and in peace, its economic value, and how to develop relations with neighbouring countries. For the first time peaceful societies. in the history of the index, a Western European country experienced one of the five largest deteriorations, with The GPI covers 99.7 per cent of the world’s population, Spain falling 10 places in the rankings to 30th, owing to using 23 qualitative and quantitative indicators from internal political tensions and an increase in the impact highly respected sources, and measures the state of of terrorism. peace using three thematic domains: the level of Societal Safety and Security; the extent of Ongoing South Asia experienced the largest regional Domestic and International Conflict; and the degree of improvement in peacefulness, with Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Militarisation. India, and Nepal all improving. Four of the five largest improvements in peacefulness occurred in sub-Saharan In addition to presenting the findings from the 2018 Africa, despite the region having a slight deterioration GPI, this year’s report includes analysis of trends in in its overall peacefulness. The single largest country Positive Peace: the attitudes, institutions, and structures improvement occurred in the Gambia, where that create and sustain peaceful societies. It looks at improvements in political instability, perceptions of changes in indicators of Positive Peace that criminality, and relations with neighbouring countries immediately precede deteriorations or improvements in saw it improve 35 places in the rankings, moving up to peacefulness, which provides a framework for 76th. The election of the new president Adama Barrow predictive analysis. The report also assesses the ways in lay behind the improvements in political stability and which high levels of peace positively influence major the Gambia’s relations with neighbouring countries. macroeconomic indicators. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region The results of the 2018 GPI find that the global level of recorded an improvement in peacefulness for only the peace has deteriorated by 0.27 per cent in the last year, third time in the last eleven years. Despite the marking the fourth successive year of deteriorations. improvement, it remains the world’s least peaceful Ninety-two countries deteriorated, while 71 countries region, a position it has held since 2015. Qatar improved. The 2018 GPI reveals a world in which the experienced the single largest deterioration in tensions, conflicts, and crises that emerged in the past peacefulness, as the political and economic boycott decade remain unresolved, especially in the Middle placed on it by the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and East, resulting in this gradual, sustained fall in Bahrain led to deteriorations in relations with peacefulness. neighbouring countries and political instability. Underlying the fall in peacefulness, six of the nine The ten-year trend in peacefulness finds that global regions in the world deteriorated in the last year. The peacefulness has deteriorated by 2.38 per cent since four most peaceful regions – Europe, North America, 2008, with 85 GPI countries recording a deterioration, Asia-Pacific, and South America – all recorded while 75 improved. The index has deteriorated for eight deteriorations, with the largest overall deterioration of the last eleven years, with the last improvement in occurring in South America, owing to falls in the Safety peacefulness occurring in 2014. In Europe, the world’s and Security domain, mainly due to increases in the most peaceful region, 61 per cent of countries have incarceration rate and impact of terrorism. deteriorated since 2008. Not one Nordic country is more peaceful now than in 2008. Iceland remains the most peaceful country in the world, a position it has held since 2008. It is joined at the top Global peacefulness has deteriorated across two of the of the index by New Zealand, Austria, Portugal, and three GPI domains over the past decade, with Ongoing Denmark. Syria remains the least peaceful country in Conflict deteriorating by six per cent and Safety and the world, a position it has held for the past five years. Security deteriorating by three per cent. Terrorism and GLOBAL PEACE INDEX 2018 | 2 internal conflict have been the biggest contributors to environment for human potential to flourish. Positive the global deterioration in peacefulness over the Peace is not only associated with higher levels of decade. One hundred countries experienced increased peace, it is also associated with stronger terrorist activity, with only 38 improving, and total macroeconomic performance, as the factors that conflict deaths increased by 264 per cent between sustain highly peaceful societies also provide a 2006 and 2016. However, contrary to public framework for robust economic development: perception, the militarisation domain recorded a 3.2 per cent improvement since 2008. The number of armed • Non-OECD countries that improved in Positive services personnel per 100,000 people has fallen in 119 Peace averaged 1.45 per cent higher GDP growth countries, and military expenditure as a percentage of per annum from 2005 to 2016 than those that GDP fell in 102 countries with only 59 countries deteriorated in Positive Peace. increasing their spending. • Improvements in Positive Peace are also linked to domestic currency appreciation, with currencies Trends over the last century show that the deterioration on average appreciating by 1.4 per cent when their in peacefulness in the last decade runs contrary to the Positive Peace improves, compared to a 0.4 per longer term trend. cent depreciation when Positive Peace deteriorates. The economic impact of violence on the global • Credit ratings are also more likely to fall when economy in 2017 was $14.76 trillion in purchasing countries experience deteriorations in Positive power parity (PPP) terms. This figure is equivalent to Peace, falling on average by 4.5 points on a 0 to 22 12.4 per cent of the world’s economic activity (gross scale, while countries improving in Positive Peace world product) or $1,988 for every person. The are more likely to see their credit ratings improve economic impact of violence increased by two per cent or stay the same. during 2017 due to a rise in the economic impact of • Countries that are high in Positive Peace have less conflict and increases in internal security spending, volatile economic performance. with the largest increases being in China, Russia and • Measures of economic efficiency are also strongly South Africa . Since 2012, the economic impact of correlated with Positive Peace across six of the violence has increased by 16 per cent, corresponding eight Positive Peace Pillars. with the start of the Syrian war and rising violence in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. Globally, Positive Peace improved by 1.85 per cent from 2005 to 2016. However, improvements in Positive Peace The report finds that peacefulness has a considerable stalled from 2013 onwards. There have been a number impact on macroeconomic performance. In the last 70 of worrying trends in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Peace Index
    security Quantifying the state of peace Global Peace Index With a new Global Peace Index countries can be ranked according to their ‘state of peace’. By Joris Voorhoeve Indicators of peace hat can be counted does not count, and what counts W cannot be counted’. Does this bon mot, attributed to Violent conflict Albert Einstein, also apply to what counts above all – peace? 1 Number of external and internal violent conflicts in 000–0 In May 2007 a group of committed individuals launched a Number of deaths from organized external conflict new website, Vision of Humanity, as the reference point for the Number of deaths from organized internal conflict Global Peace Index (GPi), which is intended to highlight the Level of organized internal conflict relationship between global peace and sustainability.1 The GPi Relations with neighbouring countries. was developed by an international team of experts brought together at the initiative of Australian entrepreneur and Societal security philanthropist Steve Killelea, and drawn up by analysts from the Level of distrust in other citizens Economist Intelligence Unit. 7 Displaced persons as percentage of the population The GPi attempts to measure the ‘state of peace’ within and Political instability among 121 nations, based on 24 indicators in three areas: aspects Level of respect for human rights (political terror scale) of violent conflict, elements of societal security, and measures of 10 Potential for terrorist acts militarization (see box). From these, two weighted indices are 11 Homicides per 100,000 people calculated to provide measures of the extent to which each 1 Other violent crime statistics country is at peace internally and with other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Terrorism on North African Tourism
    The impact of the terrorism on North African tourism Florentina-Stefania NEAGU The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania [email protected] Abstract. Tourism is one of the most important sector of the national economy and in the same time is the main reason for which the tourists visit the North African states. In 2015, the total contribution of North African tourism represent 10.8% from GDP registering an increase of 1.4% compared to 2014, also the contribution of tourism to employment was 10.4 % in 2015. But this increase was affected by the terrorist attacks in Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia. According to Global Terrorism Index for 2016, these countries are in the ranking of states with the highest impact of terrorism. Security situation in 2015 is the following: 947 incidents, 1198 deaths, 1603 injured, 264 property damages. This situation greatly influences the decision of tourists to travel in these countries. For demonstrate what is the impact on terrorism in this region have been analized the data bases of World Travel and Tourism Council, Council and Foreign Relations and Global Terrorism Database for the period 2010-2015. If the terrorist attacks continue in the next years not only the tourism will be affected but also the activities of its associates. Keywords: tourism, tourists, terrorism, security. Introduction The tourism industry annually attracts millions of tourists who want to discover new places, have fun and practice sports. The purpose of tourism is to satisfy the needs of tourists by providing them comfortable accommodation, food of the highest quality and providing entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Senegal Summary 2020
    Senegal - Threat Assessment - 2020 Page 1 of 10 Modern Slavery: The 2018 GSI Index: 46/51 1. Senegal African countries, with 43,000 modern day slaves, and an incidence of 2.9/1000 people, Section 1 - Executive Summary and a “B” response. US Trafficking in Persons gave Senegal a Tier 2 rating. Grey Lists: Senegal is not listed by FATF, or by the EU on their “Grey” lists. Senegal is, Sanctions & Terrorism: There are no sanctions however, listed by the US as a “Country of against the country. Senegal is a Tier 3 (lowest Primary Concern” in respect of ML & FC. threat) PPI 2019 (Proliferation) Index country with a “moderate ” control score of 370/1,300. National Risk Assessment: Senegal Senegal has a “very low” impact (score completed a National Risk Assessment, though 1.186/10) in the 2019 Global Terrorism Index. it appears not to be publicly available. Senegal is in US Country Reports on Terrorism. According to the GIABA report in 2018, the “NRA identified the most prevalent predicate Response & Resilience: FATF MER 4th round offences of money laundering which are: fraud, results by GIABA in 2018, were 43/100 for drug trafficking, migrants smuggling, “Technical Compliance” 40 Recommendations corruption, customs and tax offences,” and & 3/100 for “Effectiveness” 11 Outcomes. “high risk sectors are: money transfer; Senegal scored 6.04/10 for resilience (high), authorised foreign exchange; electronic ranked 5/54 for Africa in the OC Index. money; the hotel sector; the real estate sector; the legal and accounting professions.” Indices: Senegal scored 71/100, and rated “partly free” in the 2019 Freedom in the World Organised Crime: According to the OC Index, Index, and 58/100 for economic freedom Low Criminality - High Resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Peace Index 2018: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney, June 2018
    Quantifying Peace and its Benefits The Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank dedicated to shifting the world’s focus to peace as a positive, achievable, and tangible measure of human well-being and progress. IEP achieves its goals by developing new conceptual frameworks to define peacefulness; providing metrics for measuring peace; and uncovering the relationships between business, peace and prosperity as well as promoting a better understanding of the cultural, economic and political factors that create peace. IEP is headquartered in Sydney, with offices in New York, The Hague, Mexico City and Brussels. It works with a wide range of partners internationally and collaborates with intergovernmental organisations on measuring and communicating the economic value of peace. For more information visit www.economicsandpeace.org Please cite this report as: Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Peace Index 2018: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney, June 2018. Available from: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (accessed Date Month Year). Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Key Findings 4 RESULTS 5 Highlights 6 2018 Global Peace Index rankings 8 Regional overview 12 Improvements & deteriorations 19 TRENDS 23 Ten year trends in the Global Peace Index 26 100 year trends in peace 32 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE 45 Results 46 The macroeconomic impact of peace 52 POSITIVE PEACE 59 What is Positive Peace? 60 Trends in Positive Peace 65 What precedes a change in peacefulness? 69 Positive Peace and the economy 73 APPENDICES 77 Appendix A: GPI Methodology 78 Appendix B: GPI indicator sources, definitions & scoring criteria 82 Appendix C: GPI Domain scores 90 Appendix D: Economic cost of violence 93 GLOBAL PEACE INDEX 2018 | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the twelfth edition of the Global Peace Index Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq, and Somalia comprise (GPI), which ranks 163 independent states and the remaining least peaceful countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Environment and Environmental Education on Global Peace- an Analytical Study
    International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X Role of Environment and Environmental Education on Global Peace- An Analytical Study Dr. Surajit Let, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography Krishna Chandra College, (Hetampur, Birbhum) [email protected] Abstract: Peace is the mental state of happiness. There are two types of peace Positive peace and Negative peace. When in a place there is no violence such as wars is known as Negative peace on the contrary positive peace refers to the absence of structural violence that is the systematic inequities such as gender or racial discrimination. No doubt, environment is an influencing factor for peace but not a controlling factor. If we able to find out the relationship between environment and peace then it will be easy to judge the role of environmental education on global peace. Actually we should remember that global peace and mental peace is not same things. So in broad sense it is very critical to analyze. To show the relationship between environment and global peace I have used two index Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and Environmental vulnerability Index (EVI) to show the global position of those countries in respect of environmental performance. To show the global position in respect of peace I have used Global Peace Index (GPI). Key- words: Environmental Performance Index, Global Peace Index, Environmental vulnerability Index’ Resource management, global citizen, sustainable society, Global conflict. A. Introduction: Education is a lifelong process, which takes place from the womb to the tomb. Education is a human right. It is the mirror of our modern society and essential for human emancipation and social development (Sharma, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty, Political Freedom, and the Roots of Terrorism
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES POVERTY, POLITICAL FREEDOM, AND THE ROOTS OF TERRORISM Alberto Abadie Working Paper 10859 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10859 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2004 I thank Alan Krueger, David Laitin, Todd Olmstead, and Richard Zeckhauser for comments and suggestions. Financial support for this research was generously provided through NSF grant SES-0350645. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2004 by Alberto Abadie. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Poverty, Political Freedom, and the Roots of Terrorism Alberto Abadie NBER Working Paper No. 1085 October 2004 JEL No. D74, K42, H56 ABSTRACT This article provides an empirical investigation of the determinants of terrorism at the country level. In contrast with the previous literature on this subject, which focuses on transnational terrorism only, I use a new measure of terrorism that encompasses both domestic and transnational terrorism. In line with the results of some recent studies, this article shows that terrorist risk is not significantly higher for poorer countries, once the effects of other country-specific characteristics such as the level of political freedom are taken into account. Political freedom is shown to explain terrorism, but it does so in a non-monotonic way: countries in some intermediate range of political freedom are shown to be more prone to terrorism than countries with high levels of political freedom or countries with highly authoritarian regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism As a Driver of Peace Contents 1
    TOURISM AS A DRIVER OF PEACE CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 TOURISM AS A 2. KEY FINDINGS 2 3. METHODOLOGY AT A GLANCE - MEASURING TOURISM AND PEACE 2 DRIVER OF PEACE 4. THE LINK BETWEEN TOURISM, VIOLENCE, AND CONFLICT 5 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE LINK Trends in Tourism, Violence, and Conflict 6 BETWEEN PEACE AND TOURISM Risers and Fallers in Tourism, Violence, and Conflict 9 MAY 2016 Two Cases Compared: Poland and Nigeria 12 Tourism as a Force for Negative Peace 12 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5. THE LINK BETWEEN TOURISM AND POSITIVE PEACE 13 Over the last decade the world has become increasingly unequal in terms of its levels of Trends in Tourism and Positive Peace 15 peacefulness, with the most peaceful countries enjoying increasing levels of peace and prosperity, while the least peaceful countries are spiralling into violence and conflict. The economic costs of Risers and Fallers in in Tourism and Positive Peace 17 violence containment on the global economy are also significant and have increased, estimated at $13.7 trillion in 2012 and $14.3 trillion in 2014, or 13.4% of world GDP1. At the same time, tourism’s Two Cases Compared: Saudi Arabia and Angola 20 contribution to GDP has been growing at a global average of 2.3% since 2005, while foreign spending on tourism measured as visitor exports has been growing at a rate of 3.4% on average Tourism as a Force for Positive Peace 21 globally. Additionally, international passenger arrivals around the world have increased from a global average of 828 million in 2005 to 1.184 billion in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Meservey Senior Policy Analyst, Africa and the Middle East the Heritage Foundation
    Looking Forward: U.S.-Africa Relations Testimony before the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations House Foreign Affairs Committee United States House of Representatives March 26, 2019 Joshua Meservey Senior Policy Analyst, Africa and the Middle East The Heritage Foundation Chairwoman Bass, Ranking Member Smith, to protect its national interests there. This is and members of the committee, thank you an evergreen challenge that has grown more for this opportunity to testify before you. urgent given the rising great and middle With your permission, I would like to submit power competition in Africa. Many my written testimony into the record. countries are rapidly expanding their engagement on the continent—the U.S. The views I express in this testimony are my should welcome that development in the own and should not be construed as case of its allies, but for aggressive American representing any official position of The competitors such as China and Russia, it is a Heritage Foundation. challenge. U.S. Strategic Priorities in Africa One example of this problem is the port in In this testimony, I will focus on what I Djibouti. Ninety percent of the equipment consider to be the four most important U.S. the U.S. military uses to conduct its strategic priorities in Africa that should operations in East Africa flow through guide American engagement with the Djibouti. 1 Chinese companies now operate continent. three of the five terminals in Djibouti port, whereas in early 2017 they did not operate First, the U.S. must retain sufficient influence and positioning on the continent 1 General Thomas D.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Peace Index Global Peace
    GLOBAL PEACE INDEX PEACE GLOBAL GLOBAL PEACE 2019 INDEX 2019 MEASURING PEACE IN A COMPLEX WORLD Quantifying Peace and its Benefits The Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank dedicated to shifting the world’s focus to peace as a positive, achievable, and tangible measure of human wellbeing and progress. IEP achieves its goals by developing new conceptual frameworks to define peacefulness; providing metrics for measuring peace and uncovering the relationships between business, peace and prosperity, as well as promoting a better understanding of the cultural, economic and political factors that create peace. IEP is headquartered in Sydney, with offices in New York, The Hague, Mexico City, Brussels and Harare. It works with a wide range of partners internationally and collaborates with intergovernmental organisations on measuring and communicating the economic value of peace. For more information visit www.economicsandpeace.org Please cite this report as: Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Peace Index 2019: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney, June 2019. Available from: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (accessed Date Month Year). Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Key Findings 4 RESULTS 5 Highlights 6 2019 Global Peace Index Rankings 8 Regional Overview 13 Improvements & Deteriorations 20 TRENDS 25 GPI Trends 26 Peace Perceptions 32 Climate Change and Peace 43 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE 57 Results 58 Methodoogy at a glance 63 POSITIVE PEACE 65 What is Positive Peace? 66 Positive Peace and Negative Peace 71 Positive Peace and the Economy 76 APPENDICES 83 Appendix A: GPI Methodology 84 Appendix B: GPI indicator sources, definitions & scoring criteria 88 Appendix C: GPI Domain Scores 96 Appendix D: Economic Cost of Violence 99 GLOBAL PEACE INDEX 2019 | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the thirteenth edition of the Global Peace Index Four of the nine regions in the world became more (GPI), which ranks 163 independent states and peaceful over the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Global Peace Index Snapshot
    SNAPSHOT 2018 GLOBAL PEACE 2018 key highlights g 92 countries deteriorated whilst 71 countries improved INDEX SNAPSHOT between 2016 and 2017 g Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq and Somalia are the MEASURING PEACE IN least peaceful countries in the world A COMPLEX WORLD g Iceland, New Zealand, Austria, Portugal and Denmark are the most peaceful countries in the world The Global Peace Index 2018 report finds that the g Countries that improved in peace over the last decade had global level of peace has deteriorated by 0.27% seven times higher GDP growth rates over the last year. This is the fourth successive g Military expenditure compared to country GDP has been year of deterioration, finding that 92 countries steadily falling in more countries than increasing have deteriorated, while 71 countries have g Battle deaths have risen steadily over the last 10 years, improved. The report reveals a world in which increasing by 264% tensions, conflicts and crises that have emerged g Both Europe and North America become less peaceful, with 23/36 countries in Europe deteriorating last year over the past decade remain unresolved, causing g Sub-Saharan Africa was home to four of the five largest a gradual, sustained decline in global levels of improvements in peacefulness peacefulness. FOR MORE OF SECTION 1: RESULTS, SEE THE 2018 REPORT Five most & least Global economic peaceful countries impact of violence In the 2018 GPI, 92 countries deteriorated while 71 countries The global economic impact of violence, higher in 2017 than improved, with the global average deteriorating by 0.27 per at any point in the last decade, was $14.76 trillion PPP in 2017, cent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-Global-Peace-Index-Report.Pdf
    INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMICS AND PEACE GLOBAL PEACE INDEX 2012 1 THE INStitUTE FOR ECONOMICS AND PEACE GLOBAL QUANTIFYING PEACE AND ITS BENEFITS PEACE INDEX The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) is an 2012 independent, non-partisan, non-profit research organization dedicated to shifting the world’s focus to peace as a positive, achievable, and tangible measure of human well-being and progress. IEP achieves its goals by developing new This is the sixth edition of the Global Peace Index peaceful environments. conceptual frameworks to define peacefulness; (GPI), which ranks nations according to their level In the spirit of deepening knowledge and providing metrics for measurement; uncovering the of peacefulness. It is composed of 23 qualitative and understanding of the relative peacefulness of nations, relationship between peace, business and prosperity; quantitative indicators from highly respected sources, IEP has developed the first known attempt to quantify and by promoting a better understanding of the which gauge three broad themes: the level of safety measures of positive peace through the Positive Peace cultural, economic and political factors that drive and security in society; the extent of domestic or Index (PPI). This study measures the strength of the peacefulness. international conflict; and the degree of militarisation. attitudes, institutions, and structures within nations IEP has offices in Sydney, New York, and The 2012 GPI has been expanded to rank 158 which sustain peace. This provides a framework Washington, D.C. It works with a wide range of independent states and updated with the latest to determine a nation’s institutional capacity and partners internationally and collaborates with available figures and information.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of US Defense Security
    National Security Policy Complexity: An Analysis of U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Program Effects on Political Terror Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Rudolph L. Hightower, II, M.A. Graduate Program in Public Policy and Management The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Trevor L. Brown, PhD, Advisor Anand Desai, PhD Jos C.N. Raadschelders, PhD 1 Copyright by Rudolph L. Hightower, II 2017 2 Abstract This dissertation examined whether participation in US Defense Security Cooperation (DSC) programs leads to reductions in a regime’s willingness to inflict political terror such as extrajudicial killing, torture, disappearances, and political imprisonment. Two objectives framed the research: first, to identify structural factors that give rise to political terror, and second, to assess the efficacy of non-kinetic US intervention policies in allied nations. Though DSC programs are widely studied, the programs have been primarily evaluated in output terms such as dollars (Foreign Military Sales), the number of foreign officers trained (International Military Education and Training), and the number and cost of engagement events (National Guard State Partnership Program; SPP). To advance knowledge on DSC programs in outcome terms, this research started by recreating the key components of Poe and Tate (1990, 1994) causal frameworks on personal integrity rights. The initial objectives were to confirm or refute predictor variable results and to determine if the Poe and Tate-derived Political Terror Scale (PTS) was an appropriate measure to evaluate the efficaciousness of DSC programs. Next, the research expanded to include both a 167-country global time-sensitive cross-sectional (TSCS) analysis and a 46-country regional TSCS analysis using the US Geographic Combatant Commander Areas of Responsibilities (AORs) as its country-by- country delineation.
    [Show full text]