World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Contents
Foreword 3 Introducing the World Internal Security and Police Index
Executive Summary 4 Highlights 5 Map and Results Table 6 Peace and Internal Security 7 The Index 8
Results 13 Trends in Internal Security and Policing 28 Results and Trends by Domain: Capacity 31 Results and Trends by Domain: Process and Legitimacy 36 Results and Trends by Domain: Outcomes 40
Appendix A: Full Results Table 45
Appendix B: Methodology 49
Appendix C: Bibliography 53 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Foreword Introducing the World Internal Security and Police Index
The International Police Science About IPSA security services that establish security Association (IPSA) is proud to present the within society and achieve safety of its first iteration of the World Internal Security IPSA is a non-profit organisation dealing members. WISPI focuses on both effective and Police Index (WISPI). The WISPI adds with police sciences. IPSA is registered rendering of security services and the to the relatively few indices dealing with in New Jersey State, USA. The key outcome of rendered services. WISPI is peace at the global level, such as the aim of IPSA is to study and promote considered the first international index Global Peace Index (GPI) and the Fragile police sciences with a view to boosting to measure indicators of internal security States Index (FSI). quality of security performance. IPSA is worldwide; rank countries according to open for all individuals and companies their ability to provide security services Most of the aforementioned indices only concerned with security science and and boost security performance in look at results and outputs like homicide, law enforcement. IPSA has three general. WISPI was conceptualised and terrorism, and violent crime. They do not key projects: The exchange of police championed by the founder of IPSA and measure the ability of security bodies to knowledge through holding of regular developed independently by the Institute render security services. To date there has conferences, the transfer of knowledge for Economics and Peace (IEP) for IPSA. not been a composite index that measures through the promulgation and translation This Index would not have been possible internal security. The WISPI takes a holistic of research into many languages, and without the approval of my institution perspective towards security, covering the lastly the recognition and awarding of and colleagues. I would like to express general public’s perception of the police excellence in the security field, via the my sincere gratitude to the Sharjah and security as well as measuring the level IPSA security award. The award has three Police, for their support and for allowing of safety provided and the forces needed categories: police practices and society, us to complete the development of to provide that level of security. innovation and creativity in the security the World Internal Security and Police field, research on policing and promotion The WISPI adopts a wide range of Index (WISPI). Also, I am grateful to our of security performance. For further qualitative and quantitative data in order team for exemplary professionalism and information, visit www.ipsa-police.org to classify countries’ levels of internal encouragement. security. It measures the ability of Why is WISPI unique? security institutions to maintain security, the effectiveness of those services, the As the world becomes increasingly data- public’s trust in rendered services, and driven, international organisations such police operations and activities. The as the UN and national governments results of the Index provide a unique rely on indices issued by internationally Professor Mamdooh perspective on internal security. The WISPI recognised organisations in order to Abdelmottlep (PhD, JD) stands apart from other measures of understand the factors that are driving Professor of Criminal Justice peacefulness and violence by providing an global policy issues. WISPI has been Management & Security Expert assessment of internal security outcomes, created to go beyond the existing Founder & Executive Chairman general public’s perception of quality and measures of violence or peace, as an of International Police Science the ability of police to respond to future international index measuring the ability Association (IPSA) internal security issues. of police institutions worldwide to render
1 1) Executive summary terrorist organisations andinsurgencies. are under-resourced, andstretched by security providers insub-Saharan Africa security onaverage. issues Many state Saharan Africa having internal themost to internal securitywithsub- issues, levelthe highest ofpoliceresponsiveness the USA) andEurope are theareas with Regionally, NorthAmerica(Canada and not included intheIndex. involved inprotracted internal conflictare aswell countries currentlydata, 21st century. Countrieswithinsufficient serious threats to internal security inthe corruption, andterrorism allremain Migration, regional contagion,civilunrest, significantly, butserious threats remain. to internal security have increased of thenation-state. Resources devoted has becomethepredominant concern become less common,internal security and aswars between nations have external security concerns have waned, The report reinforces the fact that as Index have changed inthemodern era. examining howthe16indicators inthe at internal securityandtrends, issues by the above thisreport fourdomains, looks In addition to ranking countries across 127 internal security. currentdomain assesses threats to in afavourable Finally, light. theoutcomes security providers, particularly thepolice, is ameasure ofwhetherthepublicview effective manner. The legitimacy domain devoted to internal security are usedinan domain looks at whethertheresources devotes to internal security. Theprocess examines theresources that anation and outcomes. Thecapacity domain capacity,security: process, legitimacy, The WISPI looks atofinternal fourdomains using16indicators.domains, countries,across in127 issues four providers to address internal security ability ofthepoliceandothersecurity and Peace (IEP).TheIndex measures the developed by theInstitute forEconomics and (IPSA), Police ScienceAssociation Police andtheInternational Department (WISPI), commissionedby theSharjah Internal Security andPolice Index This isthefirst editionofthe World issues oftenissues cometo theforefront. crucial momentat whichinternal security from onegovernment typeto another isa democratic elements). Thetransition (which have bothauthoritarian and regimes score better thanhybrid regimes Index scores onaverage, butauthoritarian and flawed democracies have thehighest security challenges. Full democracies levels inresponding ofsuccess to internal Different government have types varying ofregionalshowing fewsigns contagion. have proven to beremarkably stable, severalturmoil, Middle Eastern countries State inIraq andSyria this (ISIS).Despite of theterrorist organisation the Islamic Arab Spring, andtherise inSyria, civilwar the lastdecade, withtheevents ofthe serious internal security threats arise over North Africa (MENA)region hasseen between countries.TheMiddle Eastand regionsOther have muchmore variation last 60years. more crucialnowthanat any pointinthe to internal security threats isarguably Thus,the security serviceresponse2014. people beingkilled interrorist attacks in last calendar year, withover 32,000 terrorism increased 80percentinthe the endofWorld from War II. Deaths is nowhigherthanat any pointsince internally displaced people intheworld the world. Thenumberofrefugees and Syria andIraq continueto befeltaround flow oneffects from internal conflictsin future.serious issueinthenear The Internal security islikely to remain a
the forefront. often come to security issues at which internal crucial moment to another is a government type onefrom The transition World Internal SecurityandPolice Index 2016
2 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Highlights > Terrorism remains one of the greatest threats to internal security. Terrorism has increased dramatically over the last three years, with more than 62,000 people being killed in terrorist attacks between 2012 and 2014. The biggest rise in the last year occurred in Nigeria, the worst performing country on the WISPI.
> Singapore performed best > Nigeria performed worst > North America and Europe on the Index, followed by on the Index, followed by were the two regions with Finland, and then Denmark. the Democratic Republic of the best average WISPI There were only four non- the Congo, Kenya, Uganda, scores. Sub-Saharan Africa European countries in the and Pakistan. However, had the worst average top 20. The United Arab countries with protracted score, followed by South Emirates was the highest civil conflicts are not Asia and then Central ranked country from the eligible for the Index. America and the Caribbean. Middle East and North African (MENA) region, and ranked 29th overall.
> Despite the turmoil in > Countries with smaller > Full democracies had the the Middle East, many populations performed best average score on the Middle Eastern countries better on the Index than Index, followed by flawed performed well on the larger ones. Only one democracies. Authoritarian Index. The MENA region country in the top ten had a regimes outperform hybrid had the fourth best average population greater than 25 regimes, despite the fact that regional score of the nine million, and conversely only the country with the best regions in the Index. one country in the bottom score in the Index (Singapore) ten had a population of less is a hybrid regime. than 25 million.
> Authoritarian regimes in > The resources devoted to > Corruption has been sub-Saharan Africa had policing and the criminal increasing around the globe smaller police forces and justice system have in the last 20 years. In many militaries than their Middle increased dramatically over countries, bribe payments Eastern counterparts. the past 50 years. In the US, to the police are still Overall, sub-Saharan GDP per capita increased commonplace. The Index African countries had the 191 per cent from 1961 to average for bribe payments lowest capacity scores of 2015 (when measured in to police was 30 per cent, any region. constant 2005 US dollars). with more than 50 per cent Over the same period, of respondents admitting to local, state, and federal having paid a bribe to police government spending on in 33 of the 127 countries in the police increased 484 the Index. per cent.
3 Map andResultsTable World Internal SecurityandPolice Index 2016
< Low WISPI Score High WISPI Score > 4 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Peace and Internal Security
The aim of the WISPI is to, firstly, measure the highest priority for security providing security provider performance across the institutions like the police and the four domains of internal security: capacity, military. Of course, there are trade-offs process, legitimacy and outcomes. involved in all forms of government Secondly, to see how these domains relate spending, and in a perfect world there to each other and finally to track trends in would be no need for any type of security these domains over time, and to inform forces whatsoever. However, given the work of security providing agencies, the threats to internal security that researchers, and practitioners in the field almost every government faces, some of peace and conflict studies, criminology, level of security spending is not only and police studies. understandable, but also necessary for maintaining and promoting peace. IEP has been studying security, conflict and the drivers of peacefulness since IEP’s existing research suggests that 2007. The Global Peace Index, which in the long run, promoting Positive will have its tenth iteration released in Peace is the best, most reliable, and 2016, is the world’s leading measure of most consistent method of ensuring peacefulness, and IEP has also released negative peace. However, in the short national peace indices, the Global run strong security institutions are Terrorism Index, and various other reports needed to prevent conflict, to allow for that examine the drivers of peace and its fast recovery after conflicts break out, economic benefits. and to promote stable environments in which the development of the attitudes, Central to IEP’s work has been an institutions, and structures associated understanding that peacefulness can with peaceful environments is a feasible be divided into two aspects: Negative goal. In order to do this, security forces Peace, which is the absence of violence need to have the necessary capacity to and the fear of violence, and Positive perform their job properly. They need to Peace, which consists of the attitudes, have effective methods and techniques institutions, and structures which support of policing and conflict resolution. They peaceful societies. These two aspects are need to be legitimate in the eyes of their linked both statistically and theoretically. own citizens. And they need to be able Societies with higher levels of Positive to reduce threats to internal security like Peace have lower levels of interpersonal violent crime, homicide, terrorism, and violence and are less likely to fall into the fear of violence. conflict. Conversely, when conflict does break out, it can degrade or destroy the institutions and structures which drive Positive Peace, which can in turn lead to further violence and destruction. Changes in Negative and Positive Peace feedback upon each other in either a virtuous or vicious cycle of falling or rising violence.
Given the huge costs associated with deteriorations in peacefulness, preventing serious threats to internal and external security should be (and is) one of the highest priorities for governments, and
5 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
The Index
While ‘internal security’ is commonly policing and enforcing internal security is As mentioned above, a broader definition conceptualised in terms of conflict their primary objective, and they are likely of internal security includes a large between the state and insurgency groups to be the first responders to violence and number of concepts that are partially within a nation’s borders, a broader instability in times of social upheaval. measured by tens if not hundreds of definition encompasses any factor, existing indicators, as well as many well- process, or shock that destabilises What is the World established composite indices. Given or threatens the state. This broader Internal Security this broader definition, it is unlikely that definition allows for the inclusion of not and Police Index? a single index could adequately measure only traditional internal security issues The World Internal Security and Police internal security in a meaningful way. like insurgency, terrorism, and civil Index (WISPI) should not be thought Whilst it might be possible to incorporate unrest, but also other areas of internal of as a measure of the level of ‘internal all the areas by using more abstract violence like violent crime, organised security’ at the country level. Rather, indicators that look at the functioning crime, riots, and citizen perceptions of the Index aims to measure the ability of government processes, this would safety, governance issues (particularly of the security apparatus within a dramatically increase the overlap between state effectiveness and corruption), country to respond to internal security this Index and other indices that measure and exogenous shocks such as natural challenges, both now and in the future. the rule of law. disasters, climate change, and increased For the purposes of the Index, ‘security migration flows. In short, internal security apparatus’ predominantly refers to the How is the Index Structured? as measured by the WISPI is the ability of police, although a number of indicators police to realise security within society also touch upon the ability of the military, Accurately measuring and tracking how and safety of its members. the judicial system, and the private sector well the security apparatus in a country As the state has a monopoly on legitimate to address internal security issues. This can respond to internal security concerns violence, responsibility for upholding means that a country that currently does is not just a matter of totalling up existing and maintaining internal security falls not have many internal security issues, police financial resources and human upon those state agencies to whom or relies upon tacit rather than explicit resources, nor is it only an exercise in the privilege of legitimate force is enforcement, may have a worse rank than comparing crime stats. A country with extended. The police, judicial, criminal a country that has more issues but has high numbers of police officers many justice, and intelligence services are also devoted more police resources to not deploy these officers effectively, may the main institutions that deal with keeping them contained. not have a smoothly functioning criminal internal security, although in exceptional The purpose of a composite index is to justice system to adequately capitalise circumstances, the armed forces may also simplify a complex or abstract concept on effective policing, and may act in an play a role. Furthermore, in most societies into a single quantitative measure overly aggressive manner that actually internal security is also informally or (often with subcomponents) in order to increases societal tension. Conversely, a tacitly enforced by collection of social compare performance across countries country with low crime rates and effective attitudes, informal institutions, and or states, and to track improvements processes may not have enough police structures that combine to promote social or deteriorations over time. In order for officers or police resources to deal with stability. However, as the police (and an index to be useful, it must have a a serious shock like a series of terrorist similar institutions) are largely responsible clear concept and a unit of account (for attacks, a huge natural disaster, rioting, for enforcing the state’s monopoly on example, a country, state, or city) that will or a humanitarian crisis and consequent legitimate internal violence, the task of lead to meaningful comparisons. refugee movements.
The Index aims to measure the ability of the security apparatus within a country to respond to internal security challenges, both now and in the future.
6 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
To cover all of these issues related to Table 01: World Internal Security and Police Index, Domains and Indicators internal security, the WISPI consists of 16 indicators across four different domains: Domain Indicator Definition Source capacity, effectiveness, legitimacy, and outcomes. The full list of indicators across Police Number of Police and UNODC - Crime Trends Internal Security Officers Survey the four domains is shown in Table 1. per 100,000 people There are many potential indicators of Armed Forces Number of Armed Service IISS - Military Balance police operations or internal security Personnel per 100,000 that were not included in the Index. people
Many potential good sources did not Private Security Number of Private Security Small Arms Survey have enough data, or suffered from Capacity Contractors per 100,000 people comparability issues across countries, or were general measures of internal security Prison Capacity Ratio of Prisoners to World Prison Official Prison Capacity Population Project or the rule of law that were not related to the operations of security providers. For a Corruption Control of Corruption WB - World Governance full discussion of the indicators that were Indicators included, as well as a summary of the data Effectiveness Criminal Justice World Justice Project collection and imputations issues, see the effectiveness, impartial, respects rights methodology in Appendix B. Bribe Payments % of Respondents who Global Corruption to Police Paid a Bribe to a Police Barometer In keeping with the purpose of the Index Process Officer in the Past Year as a measure of police responses to Underreporting Ratio of Police Reported IEP Analysis internal security issues, every indicator Thefts to Survey Reported that was chosen for the final Index can be Thefts influenced by changes in the role, funding, or operations of security providers Due Process Due process of law and World Justice Project rights of the accused (almost always the police, but sometimes Confidence % of Respondents who Gallup World Poll the military, private sector, or broader in Police have Confidence in Their criminal justice system). Each domain and Local Police indicator adds a piece of information that Public Use, Government officials in the World Justice Project Private Gain police and the military do when combined into a single composite not use public office for measure gives the fullest picture of police Legitimacy private gain response to internal security. Political Terror Use of Force by Political Terror Scale Government Against Domain 1: Capacity Its Own Citizens
The purpose of the capacity domain is Homicide Number of Intentional UNODC - Crime Trends Homicides per 100,000 Survey to assess whether the level of resources people devoted to internal security in a country Violent Crime % Assaulted or mugged in Gallup World Poll are sufficient to deal with existing internal the Last Year security issues, and whether these Terrorism Composite measure of Global Terrorism Index
Outcomes deaths, injuries, and resources are adequate to deal with any incidents of terrorism unexpected outbreak of civil unrest. To Public Safety Perceptions of safety Gallup World Poll effectively deal with violent crime and Perceptions walking alone at night civil unrest, the police must have enough resources to deal with crime on a day to day basis, enough presence to act as a deterrent for criminal activity and a
7 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
signifier of a stable rule of law, enough general governance environment suffers Domain 3: Legitimacy support from the military and private from high levels of corruption, security sector in the event of extreme social measures and initiatives are likely to be The purpose of the legitimacy domain breakdown, and adequate infrastructure less effective. If the criminal justice system is to measure whether the police and to allow for effective operations. Each in particular is corrupt, police operations security services act in the best interest of the country and its citizens, measured of the four indicators in the domain will almost certainly be less effective, by both expert assessment and by citizen addresses one of these factors. creating incentives for suboptimal police perceptions. It is possible for a country The scoring system for the capacity performance. Previous research by IEP has to have both adequate police resources domain is not solely concerned with found that perceptions of corruption in and an effective criminal justice system, comparing overall levels of police the police and judicial systems is closely but if security providers are not seen as numbers and resources between correlated with high levels of crime and legitimate then tensions between citizens countries. Beyond a certain point, high levels of civil unrest. Finally, the and the police can fester or even increase increasing police numbers does little to presence of high levels of underreporting to the point that civil unrest turns into impact the level of crime within a country, is indicative of an inefficient police system, rioting or prolonged disorder and distrust of the state.
Due process captures whether or not The presence of high levels of those in the criminal justice system are treated justly or adequately, as opposed underreporting is indicative of to effectively. Confidence in local police an inefficient police system, as it captures whether or not citizens feel shows that citizens do not trust that that they can trust police with everyday policing tasks, whist the private gain involving the police will lead to a indicator provides an expert assessment positive outcome. of police and military legitimacy at the national level, which survey data alone would not be able to capture. Lastly, the political terror indicator measures and the existence of excess military as it shows that citizens do not trust that whether the state suppresses dissent by capacity may even act as an incentive involving the police will lead to a positive using excessive force and terror tactics for the unnecessary use of force in some outcome, even if the police are generally against its own people. situations. Similarly, the appropriate seen as trustworthy or incorruptible. The scoring system for the legitimacy level of policing will always be context The scoring system for the effectiveness domain is similar to that for the process specific; more police resources are domain, in that it is a measure of needed in times of crisis than in relatively domain is not absolute. It would be security force legitimacy against the best calm periods. Finally, a low score in the impossible for the police to effectively performing police systems globally. No capacity domain does not necessarily deal with every crime, and it is unlikely state that tolerates unlimited dissent mean that a country is at risk of suffering that every crime would be reported to the could ever be seen as being perfectly from unexpected civil unrest, only that police even if they were perfectly trusted legitimate, and no citizenry would ever in the case of some external shock or and had infinite resources. Similarly, have the full amount of information disturbance, the criminal justice system the presence of police corruption or required to properly assess the would have the optimal level of resources petty corruption in the governance legitimacy of its security forces. However, to respond appropriately. system at large may actually work as an a high score on the legitimacy domain informal mechanism for increasing police Domain 2: Effectiveness is a good indication that civil unrest responsiveness in countries where the in a country is unlikely to be triggered The purpose of the effectiveness domain police are under-resourced. Thus, the by dissatisfaction with security forces, is to measure how well police and criminal score in the effectiveness domain should whereas a low score indicates that justice capacity is used. Having enough be thought of as a measure of how close such dissatisfaction is a significant risk financial and material resources is not in a police system is to the best performing factor, even where security forces are itself a guarantee of internal security. If the and most effective police systems globally. adequately resourced and effective.
8 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Figure 01: Scatterplot matrix of the four WISPI domains The process and legitimacy domains are closely linked. Countries with good processes are more likely to be legitimate, and also more likely to have better internal security outcomes.
00.5 1 00.5 1 00.5 1 00.5 1
1 1
0.5 0.5
Capacity 0 0
1 1
0.5 0.5
Process 0 0
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 Legitimacy 0
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 Outcomes 0
00.5 100.51 00.5 100.51
Domain 4: Outcomes even if levels of police recorded crime the threat to internal security in a linear are low, public fears may still be high, fashion. Terrorist attacks receive relatively The purpose of the outcomes domain which indicates that there is some threat more attention when they are sporadic is to measure the size of existing threats to internal security which is not being and unpredictable, and similarly once to internal security, as they stand at the adequately dealt with by security forces. violent crime reaches a certain point, current time. High levels of violent crime citizen and police behaviour begins to A low score on the outcomes domain are indicative of a lack of police control shift in order to reduce the likelihood of suggests that existing levels of internal over public spaces. A homicide rate being a victim of violent crime. violence and conflict pose a serious threat above the global average is not only an to the state and are not adequately being indication of general social breakdown and Relationship dealt with by security forces, whilst a Between the Domains police ineffectiveness, but also usually a high score suggests that current levels of proxy for some underlying disturbance internal violence are not a serious threat Every composite index will have a trade- or conflict such as unchecked organized to internal security and public order, off between robustness and uniqueness. crime that threatens internal security. even if the police are under-resourced, If the indicators and domains of an index Whilst terrorism is uncommon, it provides ineffective, and seen as illegitimate. As are strongly correlated, then the index a unique threat to internal security as with the capacity domain, the scoring is likely to be robust, meaning that the terrorist attacks destabilize public life and system for the outcomes domain choice of weights for the domains will change citizen behaviour and attitudes in recognises that the presence of violence not greatly impact the final rankings ways unlike other forms of violence. Finally, beyond a certain point does not add to of the index. This means that the index
9 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
This report divides government types into four categories, taken from the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index: Full Democracies, Flawed Democracies, Hybrid Regimes and Authoritarian Regimes.
is more objective, and less a product forces. The connection between capacity Examining internal security issues by of normative, qualitative decisions. and outcomes is slightly stronger government type is revealing because However, an index that is perfectly robust (r=0.41), suggesting that the presence one of the most destabilising factors is unlikely to be a true measure of some of sufficient security force capacity is that leads to reduced internal security is composite, unobserved variable, as the sometimes enough to produce good regime change, or regime transition from rankings would be exactly the same if all internal security outcomes. more authoritarian forms of governance the indicators bar one were removed. By to democracy, or vice versa. As the The process and legitimacy domains have contrast, an index that is unique is more primary function of most security forces the strongest correlation with each other likely to properly capture the underlying is the maintenance of order, the potential (r=0.91). Countries with more effective phenomenon that the index aims to disruption that stems from regime change security force processes, with lower measure, but is also much more sensitive or governance change can lead to security levels of corruption and underreporting, to the choice of weights and indicators, forces opposing, frustrating, disrupting, are much more likely to be seen as which places a greater importance on or even outright preventing democratic legitimate by both citizens and experts. the qualitative aspects of index design. reform. Regime or governance change is Both process and legitimacy are also As illustrated in Figure 1, each of the four perhaps the most powerful example in the closely linked with outcomes (r=0.66 and WISPI domains correlates at a statistically modern world of an event which ripples significant level (p <0.05) with the other r=0.75 respectively). throughout the entirety of society, with domains, although some of the domains the potential for widespread violence and Geographical Regions are much more closely linked than others. and Government Types instability to take hold. The capacity domain has the weakest Thus, examining the Index results and correlation with the other domains. It Much of the analysis in this report looks at general trends in internal security by is most weakly correlated against the results not only for individual countries or governance type helps to illustrate how legitimacy domain (r=0.36), followed by the average Index score, but also by region police forces in some countries rely on the process domain (r=0.41) Countries and government type. capacity at the expense of legitimacy with the lowest process scores are much Regional analysis can highlight the and processes, and how this can lead more likely to have either very high or very way in which internal security issues to more instability in the long run. This low capacity scores. This reflects either an are geographically distributed, and report divides government types into four overreliance on security forces to promote how certain factors that contribute to categories, taken from the Economist internal security at the expense of insecurity can spread beyond the borders Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index: Full processes and legitimacy, or the absence of one country and into neighbouring Democracies, Flawed Democracies, Hybrid of sufficient institutional resources and countries. The existence of regional Regimes, and Authoritarian Regimes. strength to allow security forces to scoring clusters suggests that there are operate in an effective manner. geographical or cultural factors that The connection between capacity and render ineffective security force strategies legitimacy is very similar; a lack of that work in other regions or countries. capacity leads to a lack of trust in the Conversely, if a region has a wide range of ability of police, but too much can lead scores across indicators and domains, this to an overreliance on force which may suggests that regional or cultural factors result in state repression of citizens, are less likely to play a significant role with leading to a lack of trust in security regards to internal security issues.
10 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Highlights > High levels of police, armed forces and private security was not a guarantee of good internal security outcomes. Most of the best performing countries on the Index had average capacity scores.
> However, a lack of security > The Asia-Pacific and sub- service capacity was a Saharan African Regions good predictor of poor had the most variation internal security outcomes. between countries. Central The worst performing America and the Caribbean, countries on the Index and North America had the tend to have insufficient lowest variance. numbers of police, not enough private security, and overcrowded prisons.
> Countries with smaller > Full democracies had populations perform better the best average Index on the Index. The average scores, followed by flawed population of a top ten democracies. However, country was just under authoritarian regimes 17 million, compared to scored better on average 84 million for a bottom than hybrid regimes. ten country.
The best performing countries on the WISPI had excellent process, legitimacy, and outcomes scores, and average or slightly above average capacity scores. Only two countries (Singapore and Australia) ranked in the top ten countries had a top 50 capacity score. Conversely, the worst performing countries in the Index perform poorly across all four domains. This suggests that while the lack of security service capacity usually leads to poor internal security outcomes, beyond a certain level additional security service capacity does not necessarily lead to better processes, increased legitimacy, or better outcomes.
There is a weak but statistically significant correlation between the size of a country’s population and its Index score (r=-0.33), as shown in Figure 2 (overleaf). Countries with smaller populations tend to have better security service responses to internal security challenges.
The ten best performing countries have an average population of just under 17 million, whereas the ten worst performing countries have an average population of over 84 million. Only three countries in the bottom 20 have a population of less than ten million people. In general, larger populations mean that coordination problems between security services are increased, processes are less likely to scale up effectively, and larger urban populations
Results are usually associated with increased homicide, violent crime, and fear of violence.
Regionally, the best performing areas were North America, Europe, and the Asia- Pacific Region, with the worst performing regions being sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Central America and the Caribbean. However, there was a great deal of variation within regions, as shown in Figure 3. The two regions with the greatest variation are
2) Asia- Pacific and sub-Saharan Africa. The Asia-Pacific region had the third highest
11 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Sub-Saharan Africa is home regional score overall, as well as the country with the best overall score to seven of the ten worst (Singapore), and three other countries performing countries. in the top 20 (Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea). However, the average Asia-Pacific score of 0.653 was well below the European and North America averages. The region is also home to several countries that had very poor internal security situations, most notably Figure 02: Overall Score vs Population Myanmar, which ranked 101st overall. Smaller countries tend to have better security force Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, and the responses to internal security issues (r = -0.33). Philippines also ranked in the bottom half of the Index. 9.5 -0.33 Sub-Saharan Africa is home to seven 9 of the ten worst performing countries, 8.5 with Nigeria, the Democratic Republic
8 of the Congo, Kenya, and Uganda all being ranked in the bottom five. 7.5 These four countries performed poorly 7 Log Population across all four domains. Perhaps the 6.5 most noticeable deficit in the poorly
6 performing sub-Saharan African countries was on the capacity indicator. 5.5 Sub-Saharan African countries have
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 police officer, armed forces, and Overall Score private security rates well below the global average, and an average prison occupancy rate of 166 per cent, well above the global average. However, there Figure 03: Index Overall Scores by Region (best, worst, average) are some sub-Saharan African countries Sub-Saharan Africa has the worst index scores on average, followed by the Central that perform well on the Index, most America and Carribean. The Asia-Pacific region has the greatest range of scores. noticeably Botswana, which ranked 47th, and Rwanda, which ranked 50th. Both North America Botswana and Rwanda perform strongly on the process and legitimacy domains, Europe with Botswana in particular having low
Pacific Asia- levels of reported bribe payments to police, and high levels of confidence in Middle East and North Africa police at the local level.
Russia and Eurasia At the domain level, there are large discrepancies between average scores South America across regions, as shown Figure 4. Central America and Caribbean Europe, North America, and the Asia- Pacific are the only regions where the South Asia capacity domain did not have the highest Sub-Saharan Africa average score, with all three having higher 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 outcomes scores on average. Asia-Pacific, Overall Score MENA, Russia and Eurasia, and South
12 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Asia all had similar domain score profiles: the Global Peace Index which show that and Armenia also being ranked in the high levels of capacity, weak processes, authoritarian regimes are more peaceful top 50 countries on the WISPI. However, average legitimacy, and above average than hybrid regimes. It is also consistent a number of hybrid regimes are also outcomes. In contrast, South America with the theory that political instability is ranked near the bottom of the Index, with and Central America and the Caribbean one of the greatest challenges to internal Uganda and Kenya being ranked 124th had very similar legitimacy and outcomes security, and that governments with and 125th respectively. On average, hybrid scores. This was largely due to high unstable or uncertain political processes regimes had roughly the same capacity average homicide rates, as well as poor are more likely to face severe internal as authoritarian regimes, but had lower perceptions of public safety. security issues than governments with effectiveness, lower legitimacy, and worse regime stability, even if these governments internal security outcomes. Figure 5 shows Index scores by are undemocratic. government type. Full democracies had Authoritarian regimes in the Middle East the highest average Index score, followed Hybrid regimes and authoritarian regimes and North Africa, and the Asia-Pacific by flawed democracies. Authoritarian had the greatest variance. Singapore, region score better than authoritarian regimes had less variation and a higher which is classified as a hybrid regime by regimes in sub-Saharan Africa. The five average Index score than hybrid regimes, the EIU, had the best overall Index score, worst performing authoritarian regimes which is consistent with findings from with Georgia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, are all located in sub-Saharan Africa.
Figure 04: Domain Score by Region The best score for every region other than North America and Europe is on the capacity domain.
1
Capacity Process Legitimacy Outcomes 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 North America Asia-Pacific Russia and Eurasia South Asia Sub-Saharan Africa
Europe Middle East and South America Central America North Africa and Caribbean
Figure 05: Index Overall Scores by Government Type (best, worst, average) Full Democracies have the best index scores on average. Authoritarian regimes have a higher average score than hybrid regimes
Full Democracy
Flawed Democracy
Authoritarian Regime
Hybrid Regime
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Overall Score
13 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Geographical or cultural factors play The highest ranking country from the MENA region was the United Arab a relatively small role in determining Emirates, which ranked 29th on the Index. legitimacy and process effectiveness It scored highly on the capacity and outcomes domains, but only slightly above in authoritarian regimes, whereas average on the process and legitimacy capacity and outcomes are much domains. Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain are all also ranked amongst the top 50 more likely to be influenced by the countries on the WISPI. geopolitical environment, cultural Flawed democracies, hybrid regimes, factors, or informal institutions. and authoritarian regimes all had similar domain score profiles: high capacity, poor processes, weak legitimacy, and average outcomes. Authoritarian regimes Figure 06: Domain Score by Government Type had almost identical outcomes to flawed Full Democracies score better on every domain other than capacity. democracies, and better outcomes than hybrid regimes. Perceptions of public
0.90 safety are higher, and the average level Capacity Process Legitimacy Outcomes 0.80 of violent crime and homicide are lower, although terrorism is higher. 0.70
0.60 As shown in Figure 6, full democracies had
0.50 by far the highest average legitimacy score, with a much better due process score, 0.40 much higher levels of confidence in the 0.30 police (75.7 per cent compared to 64.7 per 0.20 cent in authoritarian regimes), and much 0.10 lower political terror. Crimes were much
0.00 more likely to be reported to the police, Full Democracy Flawed Democracy Authoritarian Regime Hybrid Regime and reported bribe payments to police were much lower, as was corruption.
Figure 7 shows that when looking at Figure 07: Scoring Range Between Best and Worst Regions, average scores across both government by Government Type and Domain type and region, one finding stands out. There is very little difference in process and legitimacy scores across The difference between the best scoring regions in authoritarian regimes. region and the worst scoring region was Capacity consistent across each government type Process and domain, with all government types Authoritarian Regime Legitimacy having large differences in capacity and Outcomes outcomes between regions. However, for authoritarian regimes, there was a strong Hybrid Regime consistency in legitimacy and process scores across regions. This suggests that geographical or cultural factors play Flawed Democracy a relatively small role in determining legitimacy and process effectiveness in authoritarian regimes, whereas capacity Full Democracy and outcomes are much more likely to be influenced by the geopolitical 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 environment, cultural factors, or Difference between best and worst scoring region informal institutions.
14 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Five best and worst performing countries
Table 2 shows the scores and ranks for the five best and worst performing countries on the WISPI. The Index ranks 127 countries, with countries currently suffering from protracted civil conflict automatically excluded from the Index, as well as countries with insufficient data coverage. This means that the five worst performing countries are not the countries which currently had the worst internal security situation, but rather the five countries not in outright conflict that had the lowest level of security provider responsiveness to internal security challenges.
Table 02: Five Best and Worst Performing Countries, Scores and Ranks
Country Overall Score Capacity Process Legitimacy Outcomes
↑ Five best performing countries
Singapore 0.898 1 0.897 21 0.829 8 0.903 4 0.963 1
Finland 0.864 2 0.674 80 0.922 2 0.919 1 0.893 9
Denmark 0.859 3 0.648 88 0.948 1 0.904 3 0.885 10
Austria 0.850 4 0.770 58 0.817 12 0.899 6 0.894 7
Germany 0.848 5 0.778 53 0.876 6 0.867 10 0.852 20
Five worst performing countries
Pakistan 0.349 123 0.729 66 0.239 116 0.173 127 0.348 121
Uganda 0.312 124 0.224 126 0.219 118 0.411 107 0.372 119
Kenya 0.298 125 0.214 127 0.180 125 0.322 123 0.456 107
Congo, DRC 0.272 126 0.440 115 0.195 122 0.227 126 0.268 124
Nigeria 0.255 127 0.416 119 0.156 127 0.264 124 0.226 127
15 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Five best performing countries
1. Singapore Figure 8: Singapore Domain Scores Singapore Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Singapore performed best on the WISPI, the top five of the Index. Eight per cent trust their local police force, the second and was the only country not classified of respondents in Singapore admitted to highest rate of any country in the Index. as a full democracy to feature in the top paying a bribe to a police officer in the Internal security has been a special ten. Singapore scored well on every Index last year, compared to one per cent in concern of the Singaporean government domain, with the best outcomes score, the Denmark and Finland, two per cent in since its independence in 1965. Singapore eighth best process score, and the fourth Germany and four per cent in Austria. suffered from race riots in 1964 (while best legitimacy score. Singapore was the Singapore had some of the lowest crime still a state of Malaysia) in which 36 only country other than Australia in the rates in the world, with a homicide rate people died, with similar riots breaking top ten that had a capacity score in the of just 0.2 per 100,000 in 2012. Only one out in 1969, leaving four dead. As such, top 50, and arguably the only country that per cent of Gallup World Poll respondents keeping the peace between different performed extremely well across every ethnic groups was at the forefront of in Singapore stated that they had been single indicator and domain in the Index. Singaporean governance in the 1960s. assaulted or mugged in the last year, the The Singaporean Internal Security Act Singapore had one of the highest police equal lowest rate in the world, and 91 per allows for preventative detention, the force and armed services rates in the cent of Singaporeans felt safe walking banning of subversive documents, and the world, partly due to a compulsory national alone at night, which was also the highest preservation of public security. Singapore service program that requires all male rate of any country in the Index. Singapore still faces several strong internal security citizens to perform two years of service has not had a recorded terrorist incident challenges, foremost of which is a shifting in the armed forces, police force, or civil since 1998, which is the earliest year that demographic structure and total fertility defence force upon turning 18. It is the comparable data is available for on the rate of 0.8, well below replacement levels. seventh least corrupt country in the world Global Terrorism Index. Unsurprisingly, according to the World Bank’s Control such low crime rates correspond with a of Corruption indicator, although bribe high level of trust in police. Ninety-three payments to the police were higher in per cent of Singaporean respondents to Singapore than in any other country in the Gallup Word Poll reported that they
16 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Eighty-five per cent of Finnish respondents to the Gallup World Poll reported that they have confidence in their local police, the tenth highest number in the world.
2. Finland Figure 9: Finland Domain Scores Finland Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Finland, the second ranking country on forces rate of 404 per 100,000 people, instance of terrorism since 1998, although the WISPI, was the highest ranked of the compared to the average of 384. there was a mass shooting in a school in five Nordic countries. All five ranked in 2007, when a gunman at a high school Finland performed particularly well on the top 15 of the Index, with an overall in Jokela killed eight people and injured the legitimacy and process domains. It 13 others. Finland’s homicide rate, while score of 0.863. Like the third ranked had the fifth lowest level of corruption, low by global standards, was noticeably country Denmark, Finland had excellent the best effectiveness indicator score, the higher than the rate in the other top five scores on the process, legitimacy, and equal third lowest level of bribe payments countries, with 1.6 homicides per 100,000 outcomes domains, but a below average to the police, and the fifth lowest level of people in Finland, compared to 0.8 in score on the capacity domain. Finland underreporting. Both citizens and experts Demark and Germany, 0.9 in Austria, and scored the best of any country on the have confidence in the police in Finland. 0.2 in Singapore. However, violent crime legitimacy domain with a score of 0.919, Eighty-five per cent of Finnish respondents was very low in Finland, with just two per the second highest process domain to the Gallup World Poll reported that they cent of respondents reporting that they score, and the ninth highest score on the have confidence in their local police, the had been assaulted or mugged in the last outcomes domain. tenth highest number in the world, and year. Perceptions of safety were also very Security provider capacity was below the World Justice Project rated Finland high in Finland, with 81 per cent of Finns the Index average in Finland, owing to as the second best country with regards reporting that they felt safe walking at the small size of its police force. There to police and military officials not using night in their local neighbourhood or city. were just 149 police officers per 100,000 their public office for private gain. State people in Finland, which was one of the violence against citizens is virtually non- lowest police force rates of any country existent, with Finland having scored the lowest level on the Political Terror Scale in the Index. The private security industry since 1988. was also relatively small in Finland, although its military had more personnel Violence and internal insecurity are rare than the Index average, with an armed in Finland. It has only had one recorded
17 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Five best performing countries
3. Denmark Figure 10: Denmark Domain Scores Denmark Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Denmark ranked third on the WISPI, was ranked as having the lowest level Internal security outcomes are generally has a very similar score profile to its of corruption in the world according to very good in Denmark, although the fellow Nordic country Finland with an the World Bank’s Control of Corruption country has suffered from increasing overall score of 0.859. Denmark scored indicator, and the third lowest level of fears about terrorism in recent years. In above average for three of the four Index bribes paid to the police according to February 2015, two shootings by the same domains, with the best process, the Transparency International’s Global man in Copenhagen saw two people killed third best legitimacy, and the tenth best Corruption Barometer. People in Denmark (along with the perpetrator), and five outcomes scores. However, Denmark had were also much more likely to report policeman wounded. Denmark had one a lower than average capacity score of thefts to the police, with Denmark’s of the lowest homicide rates in the world, 0.667, which gives it a ranking of 88th on underreporting rate being the third with 0.8 homicides per 100,000 people in the capacity domain. lowest in the world. Denmark’s strength 2012. Violent crime was relatively higher, on the process domain was mirrored by with four per cent of respondents reporting Denmark’s below average capacity score its performance on the capacity domain, that they had been assaulted or mugged in was in a large part due to the size of its where it had the third best score of any the last year. Eighty per cent of the Danish police force rate, which was one of the country on the Index. Police and the population felt safe walking alone at night smallest in the world. Denmark had military in Denmark were the least likely in their city or neighbourhood, the 16th 192 police officers per 100,000 people, to abuse their public positions for private highest level in the world. This figure has the second lowest rate of the top five gain, according to the World Justice remained steady in Denmark since 2006, countries in the Index, and the 105th Project’s Rule of Law Index, although the first year for which data is available. highest police force rate in the entire this does not translate into high levels of Index. However, its armed forces rate was confidence in the police. Seventy-seven relatively high, with 301 armed service per cent of Danish respondents reported personnel per 100,000 people. that they trust their local police force, Denmark had the best process domain which although above average was only score of any country in the Index. It the 27th highest level on the Index.
18 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Denmark’s below average capacity score was in large part due to the size of its police force rate, which was one of the smallest in the world.
4. Austria Figure 11: Austria Domain Scores Austria Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Austria had the fourth best overall score Austria’s process score was the lowest law and the rights of the accused, on on the WISPI, with above average scores of any top five country, although still which Austria ranked fifth amongst all on all four of the Index domains. Austria very high by global standards. The level countries in the Index. has the 12th highest process score, the of violence by the state against citizens Crime and other internal security sixth highest legitimacy score, and the was very low, although as recently disruptions were limited in Austria. seventh highest outcomes score. Unlike as 2009 Austria scored a two on the The country’s homicide rate of 0.9 Denmark and Finland, Austria had an Political Terror Scale, which corresponds per 100,000 people was one of the above average capacity score, and to a limited amount of imprisonment lowest in the world, and 81 per cent of ranked 58th on that domain. for nonviolent political activity. Bribe Austrians felt safe walking in their city Austria’s capacity score was the fourth payments to police were also relatively or neighbourhood at night. Only three highest of the ten best performing high in Austria, compared to other percent of Austrian respondents reported countries. It had a police force rate of nations that perform well on the Index. that they had been assaulted or mugged 328 police officers per 100,000 people, Four per cent of Austrian respondents in the last year, compared to the Index second only to Singapore amongst the report that they paid a bribe to police average of seven per cent. However, top five countries. However, its military officers in the last year. Corruption at a there have been some terrorist incidents was smaller than the Index average, broader level was also an issue in Austria, in Austria over the past five years. Three with an armed forces rates of 270 which ranks 18th on the World Bank’s people have been killed in terrorist per 100,000 people, lower than both Control of Corruption indicator. attacks between 2009 and 2014, with Denmark and Finland. The size of its security officials raising concerns that private security sector was also relatively Austrian citizens reported high levels of Austria’s geographical location makes it small, with only Denmark having a lower confidence in law enforcement officials, a hub for European Islamic State recruits private security personnel rate amongst with 86 per cent being confident about seeking passage to Syria or Iraq. the five best performing countries. their local police force. This confidence in police was backed up by strong security provider respect for the due process of
19 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Five best performing countries
Germany’s score on the outcomes domain reflects the many internal security challenges that the country faces.
5. Germany Figure 12: Germany Domain Scores Germany Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Germany was the fifth best performing Germany had a higher process score than challenges that the country faces. Its country on the WISPI, and the only country both Austria and Singapore, although homicide rate of 0.8 per 100,000 people with a population greater than ten million it was still well below Denmark and was very low, well below the global average to be ranked in the top ten, and along Finland. Germany had the least effective and less than half of the European average. with Japan, one of only two countries police and judicial system of any top five However, the level of violent crime was with a population greater than 50 million country, as measured by the World Justice equal to the European average, with four to be ranked in the top 20. Germany Project’s Rule of Law Index. However, bribe per cent of Germans reporting that they had been mugged or assaulted in the scored above average across all four payments to the police are very rare, with last year. This level of violent crime was Index domains, but did particularly well only two per cent of respondents reporting reflected in public perceptions of safety, on the process domain, where it ranked that they had paid a bribe to the police with 25 per cent of Germans not feeling sixth. However, Germany had the worst in the last year. Germans were also much safe at night whilst walking in their local outcomes score of any country in the top more likely to report crime to the police, neighbourhood or city. Terrorism is also a with Germany having the fourth lowest five, and owing to its size, location, and growing concern, with 12 recorded terrorist underreporting rate of any country in the economic strength, is facing a number attacks in Germany in 2014 (albeit with no Index. On the legitimacy domain, Germany of potential internal security challenges. fatalities), seven recorded attacks in 2011, scored well across all four. It had very low Whilst Germany’s armed forces and and four in 2012. private security force rates were below levels of political terror, low corruption in the Index average, it had a relatively high the military and armed forces, and a strong number of police officers compared to due process score. Confidence in the other high performing countries, with a security forces was also high, with 82 per cent of Germans feeling confident about rate of 295 police per 100,000 people. their local police. However, this rate was still below the Index average of 347, and below the Germany’s score on the outcomes European average of 339. domain reflects the many internal security
20 World InternalWorld Security Internal and Security Police andIndex Police 2016 Index > Results 2016
Five worst performing countries
Countries with insufficient data are excluded from the Index, as are countries currently embroiled in a sustained civil conflict, so the following five countries may not have the worst internal security situation globally. Rather, they had the weakest potential response to further outbreaks of internal disruption, and are thus more likely than other countries to fall into internal conflict.
123. Pakistan Figure 13: Pakistan Domain Scores Pakistan Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Pakistan was the fifth worst performing Unsurprisingly, confidence in the police 2004, a number that had risen to 2356 in country on the WISPI, with an overall was low, with just 34 per cent of Pakistanis 2013. Fear of terrorism was reflected in score of 0.349. Pakistan is the only indicating that they have confidence in perceptions of safety amongst citizens. country in the bottom five not from the their local police. Pakistan had the worst 50 per cent of Pakistani respondents to sub-Saharan Africa region. It had worse possible score of five on the political terror the Gallup World Poll stated that they did than average scores on three of the four scale, indicating that state terror has not feel safe walking at night in their own Index domains, but had an above average expanded to the entire population. This neighbourhoods and cities, with ten per score on the capacity domain. Pakistan reflects a regression of state behaviour cent of respondents saying that they had ranks last out of all the countries on the over the past 30 years, as Pakistan had been mugged or assaulted in the last year. Index on the legitimacy domain, and was a score of three for much of the 1980s. ranked in the bottom ten countries for Underreporting of crime was endemic, internal security outcomes. with just 0.32 per cent of thefts being Pakistan’s police force and armed service reported to the police. personnel rates were slightly below the Instability arising from internal security Index average, while its level of private issues is a serious concern for the Pakistani security was well above the Index average. Government. Pakistan had one of the However, its prison occupancy rate sits at highest levels of terrorist activity in the 177 per cent, well above the Index average world, with almost 9000 people being of 133 per cent. killed in terrorist attacks over the last five Pakistan performed poorly on the process years, in over 6800 incidents of terrorism. and legitimacy domains. Sixty-five percent In the last 15 years, terrorism has spilled of Pakistani respondents to the Global over from neighbouring countries into Corruption Barometer reported paying Pakistan. Ninety-seven people died from a bribe to the police in the last year. terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the year
21 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Five worst performing countries
124. Uganda Figure 14: Uganda Domain Scores Uganda Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Uganda was the fourth worst performing Corruption is widespread in Uganda. Despite public confidence in the police, country on the WISPI, with a score of 0.312. It scored poorly on the World Bank’s crime in Uganda was high. It had the The average score across all countries Control of Corruption indicator, and 28th highest homicide rate in the Index, was 0.6, and 0.436 in sub-Saharan Africa. 69 per cent of Ugandans admitted to and the 11th highest level of violent Uganda scored poorly across all four Index paying a bribe to a police officer in the crime. Seventeen per cent of Ugandan domains, with a particularly low score last year. Less than one per cent of respondents to the Gallup World Poll on the capacity and outcomes domains. incidents of theft were reported to the said that they had been assaulted or Uganda’s capacity score of 0.224 was the police. However, trust in police was mugged in the last year. While Terrorism second lowest in the Index, behind only relatively high for a country that scores in Uganda was nowhere near as high as in Kenya, Pakistan, or Nigeria, there have Kenya, and both its process and outcomes so poorly on the Index, with 67 per still been several terrorist attacks in the scores are ranked in the bottom ten. cent of Ugandans saying that they have last five years. There were six terrorist confidence in their local police force, Uganda had a relatively small police force incidents in Uganda in 2014, in which 98 which was above the Index average. for its size, with a police officer rate of 110 people lost their lives. Despite this trust in police, the World per 100,000 people. This was a lower Justice Project’s Rule of Law index rates police force rate than most developed, Uganda very poorly on the public use, full democracies, which typically have private gain indicator, which suggests smaller police forces. Uganda also had a that police and military officials in relatively small military, with 116 armed Uganda abuse their positions for private service personnel per 100,000 people, gain. Uganda had the best Political Terror which was smaller than the Index average Scale score of the five worst performing of 120. Uganda’s prisons were also countries, a score that has improved by badly overcrowded with a 255 per cent two points over the last 30 years. occupancy rate according to the World Prison Population Project.
22 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Political terror is on the rise in Kenya, as shown by its increase in Political Terror Scale score from 2 in 1989 to 4 in 2013.
125. Kenya Figure 15: Kenya Domain Scores Kenya Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Kenya was the third worst performing Kenya performed poorly on both the average of 11.53. Ten per cent of Kenyans country on the WISPI, and one of six process and legitimacy domains. Seventy- reported being victims of an assault or sub-Saharan countries to be ranked in the seven per cent of Kenyans reported paying mugging, far lower than the figure of 16 bottom ten countries. Kenya scored poorly bribes to the police, and only 0.11 per cent per cent in the Democratic Republic of across all four of the Index domains, but of instances of theft are reported to the the Congo, and 19 per cent in Nigeria. 50- particularly poorly on the capacity and police. In spite of these facts, confidence two per cent of Kenyans felt safe walking process domains, where it ranked last in the police at the local level remains at night in their neighbourhoods or cities. and third last, respectively. Kenya had a relatively high, with 58 per cent of Kenyans However, Kenya has suffered from an slightly better outcome score of 0.456, the expressing confidence in their local increasing number of terrorist attacks highest of any country in the bottom five. police. Corruption was high in Kenya, with in the last five years. In 2014, 291 people were killed in terrorist attacks, up from 19 the World Bank’s Control of Corruption Kenya had a relatively small police force, in 2010. indicator ranking Kenya 115th for general with 99 police officers per 100,000 government corruption. Political terror has people, compared to the Index average also been increasing in Kenya, as shown of 347 and the sub-Saharan Africa by its increase in Political Terror Scale average of 268. It also had a small private score from two in 1989 to four in 2013. security industry, with 136 private security employees per 100,000 people, which Despite performing poorly on the process was less than half of the Index average and legitimacy domains, Kenya had a of 330. Kenya had one of the smallest relatively good outcomes score, with militaries on a per capita basis, with only Kenya having the best outcomes rank of 53 armed forces personnel per 100,000 any country in the bottom five. Kenya’s people. The size of Kenya’s army has fallen homicide rate of 6.4 per 100,000 people dramatically over the last 20 years, as the was lower than the Index average of 8.05, rate was 106 in 1995. and well below the sub-Saharan Africa
23 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Five worst performing countries
Only 30 per cent of Democratic Republic of the Congo’s population felt safe walking alone at night in their neighbourhood or city.
126. Democratic Republic of the Congo Figure 16: Congo DR Domain Scores Congo DR Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
The Democratic Republic of the Congo has fluctuated significantly over the past average of 61 per cent. The homicide rate (henceforth Congo DR) suffers from a 30 year,s ranging from a high of 262 in of 28.30 per 100,000 people was also well lack of available data on internal security 2009 to a low of 98 in 1994. above the global average 8.05, and one issues. Congo DR scored 0.272, but it of the highest homicide rates outside of Corruption remains a problem in Congo South America or Central America and the does have imputed data for six of the DR, particularly in the police force. It had Caribbean countries that are plagued by 16 WISPI indicators, and in theory could the fourth worst score on the World Bank’s drug-trade related violence. Sixteen per have an Index score as high 0.50 or as Control of Corruption indicator, and 78 cent of respondents to the Gallup World low as 0.16. However, given its other per cent of respondents to the Global Poll stated that they had been assaulted indicator scores and similarity to other Corruption Barometer survey indicated or mugged in the last year. There has also countries, it is likely that Congo DR’s that they had paid a bribe to the police been a resurgence of terrorist activity in score is very close to its imputed score of in the last year. Confidence in the police the last year, with 96 incidents and 343 0.272. The country scored poorly across was below the Index average. Only 46 per deaths from terrorism in 2014. all four domains, but particularly poorly cent of the population in Congo DR have on both legitimacy and outcomes. confidence in their local police. Congo DR Congo DR had one of the smallest police scored five on the Political Terror Scale force rates of any country in the Index, with in 2014 having been a consistent poor approximately 100 officers per 100,000 performer on this indicator, scoring a five people. By comparison, the Index median every year from 1996 onwards. rate was 300, and the sub-Saharan Africa Congo DR suffers from some of the average was 268. Congo DR had an armed worst violence of any country in the forces rate larger than its regional average, Index. Only 30 per cent of the population with 193 armed services personnel per felt safe walking alone at night in their 100,000, versus 115 for sub-Saharan Africa neighbourhood or city, the second lowest on average. The size of Congo DR’s military percentage, and less than half of the Index
24 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Nigeria was the worst performing country on the WISPI, with a score of 0.255.
127. Nigeria Figure 17: Nigeria Domain Scores Nigeria Average
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Overall >
Capacity >
Process >
Legitimacy >
Outcomes >
< Domain score >
Nigeria was the worst performing country corruption was high, according to the villages. Nigeria had an estimated on the WISPI, with a score of 0.255. Nigeria Control of Corruption indicator, and 81 homicide rate of 20 per 100,000 people, scored poorly across all four domains, per cent of Nigerian respondents to the well above the Index average, and 19 per and had the worst score of any country in Global Corruption Barometer admitted cent of Nigerian respondents to the Gallup the Index on the process and outcomes to paying a bribe to a police officer in the World Poll stated that they had been domains. All of its domain scores were in last year. Only 0.06 per cent of thefts assaulted or mugged in the last year. the bottom ten countries. were reported to police. Unsurprisingly, Nigeria had an average sized police force, the Rule of Law index found that military and a relatively small military and private and police officials are likely to use their security sector. There are 219 police public positions for private gain. High officers for every 100,000 Nigerians, levels of political terror have been an issue well below both the Index median of for Nigeria since 1993, with the country 300, and the sub-Saharan Africa region scoring a 4 on the Political Terror Scale average of 268. There were an additional every year since then. 71 private security workers per 100,000 Internal conflict in Nigeria has skyrocketed people, which was one of the five lowest in the past decade, with a particularly private security sector rates. However, noticeable increase in terrorism. Over while Nigeria’s prison occupancy rate 12,000 people have been killed in terrorist was about 100 per cent, it was still below attacks since 2006, of which 7,512 the Index average of 133 per cent, and occurred in 2014 alone. The terrorist group significantly lower than the regional Boko Haram have been responsible for average of 168 per cent. most of the attacks, but Fulani militants Police and judicial system effectiveness have also been responsible for hundreds is a serious issue in Nigeria. General of deaths in attacks against farms and
25 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
The post-World War II era has brought about much greater efforts to reduce violent conflict between nations, and a subsequent focus on international organisations that seek to foster understanding, cooperation, and diplomacy between nations. This increased focus on diplomacy, coupled with the increases in destructive power brought about by advances in military technology, have made direct confrontations between nations less likely, particularly between the great powers. However, whilst violent conflicts between nations have become less common over the past 50 years, internal conflicts have become increasingly common.
Proxy conflicts within nations were a of countries involved in external violent frequent occurrence during the Cold War, conflicts. This long term trend clearly and whilst the number of internal conflicts illustrates the shift from violence between has dropped slightly over the past nations, to violence within nations. 20 years, there were still an estimated As the number of internal armed conflicts 106 active internal conflicts in 2013. Of began to increase in the late 18th century, these 106 conflicts, 24 were classified the modern understanding of the need as civil wars, with the rest being a mix for and functions of a police force began of one sided conflicts, civil wars with to coalesce. The use of private security some international actors, and conflicts agents or intelligence agents as a defacto between different non-state parties secret police in the Hapsburg Empire within a country. By contrast, there were in Internal Security and Policing made the public in other countries wary no interstate conflicts in 2013 according of the very concept of a police force. to the Uppsala Conflict Data Program The nine Peelian Principles, drafted by conflict dataset. the statesman Sir Robert Peel, were Figure 18 shows the number of countries put in place to assuage the fears of involved in internal and external conflicts, Londoners about a police force upon the going back 500 years. In the year 1500, establishment of the Metropolitan Police there were an estimated 14 countries in 1829. The Peelian Principles explicitly involved in an external conflict, with only state that the purpose of the police is to one country involved in an internal conflict. prevent crime and disorder, in lieu The number of both internal and external of internal military action. Many of the conflicts began to increase sharply after other principals touch on the themes 1775, however, it was not until the second of effectiveness, legitimacy and half of the 20th century that the number good outcomes. of countries involved in internal violent
Trends conflicts clearly overtook the number
26 World Internal Security and Police Index 2016
Figure 18: Countries Involved in Internal and External Conflicts (1500-2000) In the last 50 years,the number of countries involved in internal conflict has overtaken the number of countries involved in external conflicts.