Gompholobium Ecostatum Kuchel, Suppl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gompholobium Ecostatum Kuchel, Suppl GompholobiumListing Statement for Gomphlobium ecostatum ecostatum (dwarf wedgepea) dwarf wedgepea T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T Image by Greg Jordan Scientific name: Gompholobium ecostatum Kuchel, Suppl. Black's Fl. S. Austral.: 182 (1965) Common Name: dwarf wedgepea (Wapstra et al. 2005) Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Fabaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: endangered Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Not listed Distribution: Endemic status: not endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM Region: North Figure 1. Distribution of Gompholobium ecostatum in Plate 1. Flower of Gompholobium ecostatum Tasmania, showing Natural Resource Management (image by Natalie Tapson) regions 1 Threatened Species and Marine Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Gomphlobium ecostatum (dwarf wedgepea) SUMMARY: Gompholobium ecostatum (dwarf structures) inserted midway along the pedicels. wedgepea) is a low spreading shrub that occurs The flowers are 15 to 20 mm long and are deep in heathland and heathy eucalypt woodland on apricot to reddish with a yellow centre and sandy and gravelly soils. In Tasmania, it occurs black outer surfaces. The calyx (outermost at several locations in central Flinders Island, whorl of floral parts) is about 8 mm long, black, where it has a highly restricted distribution glabrous outside and with tomentose inside occurring within a linear range of less than margins. The keel (lower petal) is usually 20 km and likely to occupy less than 10 ha, and minutely ciliate along the edges. The pod is the total number of mature individuals is obliquely ovoid, 10 to 12 mm long and about estimated at fewer than 5000, putting the 8 mm wide, swollen and glabrous. The seeds species at risk from localised, inadvertent or are numerous, kidney-shaped, light brown and chance events. Threats include land clearance, about 1 mm long. disease, inappropriate fire regimes, stock, [description based on Curtis & Morris 1975, mechanical disturbance and changing climatic Jeanes 1996] conditions. Confusing species IDENTIFICATION AND ECOLOGY Gompholobium ecostatum is highly distinctive when Gompholobium ecostatum flowers mainly between in flower and unlikely to be confused with any October and March (Jeanes 1996). The deep other species. The other species of orange-red flowers have nectar guides and Gompholobium in Tasmania, Gompholobium huegelii, rewards adapted to pollination by bees also has trifoliate leaves and a somewhat similar (Hingston & McQuillan 2000). The species growth habit, but the flowers are yellow with recruits after fire from what appear to be a greenish markings and the stems are more or long-lived soil-stored seed bank. Its capacity for less glabrous rather than covered with short vegetative recovery is unknown. spreading hairs. Survey techniques DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT Surveys for Gompholobium ecostatum should be Gompholobium ecostatum occurs in South conducted during its flowering period, as it is Australia, Victoria and Tasmania (Jeanes 1996). otherwise difficult to detect in its heathy In Tasmania, the species occurs in heathlands habitat. Care should be taken when conducting and heathy woodlands on the sandy plains and surveys to avoid spreading Phytophthora adjacent rising hills of central Flinders Island cinnamomi by surveying in dry conditions and (Figure 1). The habitat is usually a low open ensuring that footwear and all field equipment heathy Eucalyptus nitida woodland, often with is disinfected. Xanthorrhoea australis, on sandy and gravelly soils. The elevation of known sites ranges from Description 30 to 160 m above sea level. Gompholobium ecostatum is a decumbent, horizontally spreading to erect shrub up to POPULATION PARAMETERS 0.5 m tall. The stems are wiry and covered with Gompholobium ecostatum has been recorded from short spreading hairs. The leaves are sessile and five subpopulations in Tasmania (Table 1). trifoliate. The leaflets are linear, linear- Observations from two of the subpopulations, lanceolate or linear-oblanceolate, 3 to 15 mm Centre Hill and Mulligans Hill, are from several long and about 1 mm wide, shortly stalked, and different patches each, but it is unclear if the glabrous or with short stiff hairs, with revolute species is continuous between these patches. margins and a pointed apex. The flowers are For most subpopulations there is limited solitary or occur in pairs near the end of information on plant numbers or the area branches, on pedicels to about 10 mm long. occupied (Table 1), though it seems likely that There are two minute bracteoles (leaf-like 2 Threatened Species and Marine Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Gomphlobium ecostatum (dwarf wedgepea) Table 1. Population summary for Gompholobium ecostatum in Tasmania Subpopulation Tenure NRM 1:25000 Year last Area Number of Region * Mapsheet (first) seen occupied individuals (ha) 1 The Patriarchs Patriarchs North Patriarchs 1981 unknown unknown Conservation Area 2 Badger Hill Brougham Sugarloaf North Leventhorpe 2004 2 sites c. unknown Conservation Area 100 m apart 3 Memana Road Darling Range North Leventhorpe 2001 0.15 c. 20 Conservation Area (1966) 4.1 Centre Hill (NW) Private land North Memana 2005 0.5? ‘100s’ (2000) 4.2 Centre Hill (NE) Private land North Memana 2001 c. 2 unknown 4.3 Centre Hill Private land North Memana 1975 unknown unknown (Kuhns Road) 5.1 Mulligans Hill Private land North Memana 2005 1? 100s track (N – start) (1999) 5.2 Mulligans Hill Private land North Memana 2008 0.02 50 track (centre) 5.3 Mulligans Hill Private land North Memana 2008 2 500 track (NE) (1999) 5.4 Mulligans Hill Private land North Memana 1999 unknown unknown track (S – end) * NRM Region = Natural Resource Management Region the total population of mature individuals does Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 meeting criterion B: extent of occurrence estimated to not exceed 5,000. In Tasmania the species has a 2 linear range of 19.6 km, an extent of occurrence be less than 500 km , and of about 60 km2 and the area of occupancy is known to exist at no more than five likely to be less than 10 ha. locations; a continuing decline, inferred, observed or The species was first detected on Flinders projected in area, extent and/or quality of Island in 1966, with several additional sites habitat. uncovered in the interim, most recently near Badger Hill in 2004. The presence of suitable habitat between the known sites on Flinders THREATS, LIMITING FACTORS AND Island suggests that there is a reasonable MANAGEMENT ISSUES likelihood of further subpopulations being Land clearing and/or habitat modification: detected, provided any survey effort is well- Cleared and modified land in the vicinity of timed and well-resourced. known occurrences of Gompholobium ecostatum suggest that the distribution of the species may RESERVATION STATUS have been more extensive prior to European settlement. Gompholobium ecostatum has been recorded from Brougham Sugarloaf Conservation Area, Disease: Observations in Victoria indicate that Patriarchs Conservation Area, and Darling Gompholobium ecostatum is moderately susceptible Range Conservation Area (Table 1). to the exotic soil-borne pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi (Weste 2002), though to date there have been no reports of the species being CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT affected on Flinders Island. Elements of the Gompholobium ecostatum was listed as endangered species’ heathy habitat are also liable to be on the original schedules of the Tasmanian impacted by Phytophthora (Schahinger et al. 3 Threatened Species and Marine Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Gomphlobium ecostatum (dwarf wedgepea) 2003), with the pathogen known to be present What has been done? in at least the Mulligans Hill and Patriarchs Survey and monitoring: Some subpopulations areas. have been assessed on an ad hoc basis. Inappropriate fire regimes: The heathy habitat of Gompholobium ecostatum is highly What is needed? adapted to fire. However, like other pea shrubs, it may be sensitive to prolonged, frequent Agencies, groups or individuals may assist with firing, although there is no supporting some or all of the following recovery actions. quantitative data. Coordinated efforts may achieve the best and Inappropriate grazing and disturbance most efficient results. regime: Parts of some subpopulations on provide information and extension support private land are subject to stock grazing and to relevant Natural Resource Management there are signs of erosion caused by stock committees, local councils, government trampling, which could lead to changes in agencies, the local community and population structure. Changes to fertilising development proponents on the locality, practices are also a threat, with even a one-off significance and management of known fertiliser application likely to eliminate the subpopulations and potential habitat. species. Part of the Centre Hill site has been undertake extension surveys radiating out disturbed by heavy machinery, and the site from the known sites into areas of potential north of Mulligans Hill occurs on disturbed habitat; heathland that has been scraped by machinery. Roadside & power-line maintenance: The update and implement relevant reserve original site at the margins of Memana Road management plans; was inadvertently disturbed during clearing
Recommended publications
  • Native Plants Sixth Edition Sixth Edition AUSTRALIAN Native Plants Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation
    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SIXTH EDITION SIXTH EDITION AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS Cultivation, Use in Landscaping and Propagation John W. Wrigley Murray Fagg Sixth Edition published in Australia in 2013 by ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Reed New Holland an imprint of New Holland Publishers (Australia) Pty Ltd Sydney • Auckland • London • Cape Town Many people have helped us since 1977 when we began writing the first edition of Garfield House 86–88 Edgware Road London W2 2EA United Kingdom Australian Native Plants. Some of these folk have regrettably passed on, others have moved 1/66 Gibbes Street Chatswood NSW 2067 Australia to different areas. We endeavour here to acknowledge their assistance, without which the 218 Lake Road Northcote Auckland New Zealand Wembley Square First Floor Solan Road Gardens Cape Town 8001 South Africa various editions of this book would not have been as useful to so many gardeners and lovers of Australian plants. www.newhollandpublishers.com To the following people, our sincere thanks: Steve Adams, Ralph Bailey, Natalie Barnett, www.newholland.com.au Tony Bean, Lloyd Bird, John Birks, Mr and Mrs Blacklock, Don Blaxell, Jim Bourner, John Copyright © 2013 in text: John Wrigley Briggs, Colin Broadfoot, Dot Brown, the late George Brown, Ray Brown, Leslie Conway, Copyright © 2013 in map: Ian Faulkner Copyright © 2013 in photographs and illustrations: Murray Fagg Russell and Sharon Costin, Kirsten Cowley, Lyn Craven (Petraeomyrtus punicea photograph) Copyright © 2013 New Holland Publishers (Australia) Pty Ltd Richard Cummings, Bert
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Methods Results
    Papers and Proceedings Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 1999 103 THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS OF THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE HUNTINGFIELD AREA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by J.B. Kirkpatrick (with two tables, four text-figures and one appendix) KIRKPATRICK, J.B., 1999 (31:x): The characteristics and management problems of the vegetation and flora of the Huntingfield area, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 103-113. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University ofTasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The Huntingfield area has a varied vegetation, including substantial areas ofEucalyptus amygdalina heathy woodland, heath, buttongrass moorland and E. amygdalina shrubbyforest, with smaller areas ofwetland, grassland and E. ovata shrubbyforest. Six floristic communities are described for the area. Two hundred and one native vascular plant taxa, 26 moss species and ten liverworts are known from the area, which is particularly rich in orchids, two ofwhich are rare in Tasmania. Four other plant species are known to be rare and/or unreserved inTasmania. Sixty-four exotic plantspecies have been observed in the area, most ofwhich do not threaten the native biodiversity. However, a group offire-adapted shrubs are potentially serious invaders. Management problems in the area include the maintenance ofopen areas, weed invasion, pathogen invasion, introduced animals, fire, mechanised recreation, drainage from houses and roads, rubbish dumping and the gathering offirewood, sand and plants. Key Words: flora, forest, heath, Huntingfield, management, Tasmania, vegetation, wetland, woodland. INTRODUCTION species with the most cover in the shrub stratum (dominant species) was noted. If another species had more than half The Huntingfield Estate, approximately 400 ha of forest, the cover ofthe dominant one it was noted as a codominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Photo Editor
    Environmental research on the impact of bumblebees in Australia and facilitation of national communication for and against further introductions Kaye Hergstrom Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallery Project Number: VG99033 VG99033 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the vegetable industry and Hydroponic Farmers Federation. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 0532 0 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 1 50 Carrington Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2002 Environmental Research on the Impact of Bumblebees in Australia and Facilitation of National Communication for/against Further Introduction Prepared by Kaye Hergstrom1, Roger Buttermore1, Owen Seeman2 and Bruce McCorkell2 1Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, 40 Macquarie St, Hobart Tas., 2Department of Primary Industries, Water and the Environment, Tas. 13 St Johns Ave, New Town, Tas. Horticulture Australia Project No: VG99033 The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support provided by: Horticulture Australia Additional support in kind has been provided by: The Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Front cover illustration by Mike Tobias; design by Lexi Clark Any recommendations contained in this publication do not necessarily represent current HRDC policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Pea Plants Walkabout KWG
    Native Pea Plants Walkabout KWG standard (petal) wing wing (petal) (petal) keel (2 petals) Pea plants and wattles (botanically, members of the Fabaceae family) both possess root nodules containing nitrogen-fixing bacteria and have pods as their fruit. We classify the pea plants as Fabaceae, Subfamily Faboideae, the wattles as Fabaceae, Subfamily Mimosoideae. Many native pea plants grow in Ku-ring-gai Wildflower Garden, most of them with yellow–coloured flowers. Take a walk through the garden and see if you can find them. To help with their identification pictures of these species are shown below and underneath each picture a few key features are noted. Fuller descriptions of these plants can be found on Australian Plants Society – North Shore Group Blandfordia website: https://austplants.com.au/North-Shore/ in “Notes” on the Walks & Talks page. Excellent pictures can be found on the Hornsby Library website: www.hornsby.nsw.gov.au/library under: eLibrary, Learning and Research, Hornsby Herbarium. Detailed botanical descriptions are given on the PlantNET website: http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/ Dillwynias – all have ‘ear-like’ standards Phyllota phylicoides: standard Pultenaea stipularis: slight dip in Dillwynia floribunda (topmost picture): cathedral-shaped, new growth standard, stem densely covered with flowers dense towards end of branches extends beyond inflorescence, brown stipules Dillwynia retorta: twisted leaves green leaf-like bracteoles Bossiaea heterophylla: large dip in Bossiaea obcordata: large dip in Bossiaea scolopendria:
    [Show full text]
  • APS Mitchell Newsletter 2020 7.10 November
    NEWSLETTER November 2020 Email: [email protected] PO Box 541, Kilmore Victoria, 3764 Website: www.apsmitchell.org.au Inc# A0054306V Volume 7, Issue 10 November news...! Mitchell Diary Hello and welcome to our November 2020 Dates.. edition... Due to the ongoing Woohoo!!!. Good news, we appear to be COVID-19 getting close to being able to resume group (Coronavirus) activities and meetings. The committee have pandemic & scheduled a planning session & hope to make changing local announcements within a week or two (via restriction levels we Goodenia sp. at Monument Hill have yet to re- email), once organising is complete. Photo: Jan Harrison schedule Meetings, Additionally there is the excellent group news outings and other that we have a new Gardens for Wildlife everyone, hopefully in the near future & gatherings. Coordinator—See page 2 for details. Welcome at some point next year. Currently, we await on board Gerry! The February newsletter is due for issue the re-opening of meeting rooms This is our last newsletter for the year, & I on or within a few days of Monday across the Mitchell cannot say thank you enough to the virtual February 8th. Contributions will remain Shire (potentially in village of people who have helped me fill the very greatly appreciated—please send the new year), & pages of our newsletters throughout this Covid- items in by February 1st 2021. Email to: further increases in 19 year of restricted physical contact. The [email protected] allowed gathering support of our community has been amazing, Thanks again, virtual hugs to all, stay numbers in various and all our contributors have my deep, eternal safe, well, & may we all enjoy a very settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminal Differentiation of Symbiotic Rhizobia in Certain Legume Species And
    Terminal differentiation of symbiotic rhizobia in certain legume species and its implications for legume-rhizobia coevolution A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Ryoko Oono IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY R. Ford Denison Advisor August, 2010 © Ryoko Oono 2010 Acknowledgements I would like to give special thanks to Bruce A. Sorrie, Alan Weakley, Carol A. McCormick, Will Cook, Mark T. Buntaine and Troy Mielke for helping me find legume species in North Carolina and Minnesota. This thesis would also not be possible without the mentorship of my committee members, Ruth G. Shaw, George D. Weiblen, Peter Tiffin, and Imke Schmitt as well as the patience and guidance from my thesis advisor, R. Ford Denison, and senior lab graduate student, Will C. Ratcliff. Many thanks for supporting me these last five years and taking the time in fostering my research skills. Additional thanks to many of the undergraduate students working in our lab, including Carolyn G. Anderson, who contributed to Chapter 4 and Justin Bower, whose work will build upon this dissertation. I would also like to thank Toby E. Kiers for giving me the opportunity to write a Tansley Review with her for New Phytologist. Thank you to Janet I. Sprent for collaborating with me on the publication of Chapter 2 and Mike Sadowsky for many interesting discussions on rhizobia. Thank you to the University of Minnesota Plant Biological Sciences Program for supporting me as a graduate student for these past five years with teaching assistantships and summer fellowships.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy
    WHITEHORSE URBAN BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY For Council managed open space, streetscapes and community facilities Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy for Council Managed Open Space, Streetscapes and Community Facilities Contents Acknowledgements 4 9.1.11 Ground Level Habitat/Coarse Woody 24 Executive Summary 5 Material Fuel Reduction Guidelines Glossary Of Terms 6 9.1.12 Expand the Existing Infill Tree Planting 24 Program to Improve Canopy Cover 1 Introduction 6 9.1.13 Biodiversity Research Liaison 24 Committee 2 What Is Biodiversity 8 2.1 Defining “Whitehorse Biodiversity” 8 9.2 New Biodiversity Actions: One-Off 25 2.2 What are Public Whitehorse 8 Commitments Biodiversity Assets? 9.2.1 Development of An Inventory of 25 2.3 Water and Biodiversity 8 Whitehorse Biodiversity Assets 3 Statutory Context 13 10 9.2.2 List of “Biodiversity Hotspots” 25 3.1 Whitehorse City Council Policies 10 9.2.3 Development of A Biodiversity 26 and Strategies Corridors Plan 9.2.4 Identify Potential “No Mow” Areas 26 4 The Whitehorse Landscape and Biodiversity 10 9.2.5 Vegetation Management Plans For 26 4.1 Aboriginal History of Whitehorse 10 Large Tracts Of Land With 4.2 Natural Landscape of Whitehorse 10 Alternative Uses 4.3 The Remaining Natural Landscape 12 9.2.6 Biodiversity Engagement – Logos 26 of Whitehorse and Signage 4.4 The Suburban Whitehorse 14 9.2.7 Development Of Monitoring 27 Landscape Program 4.5 What Biodiversity is Missing 14 9.2.8 Community Reporting and Data 27 From Whitehorse Gathering 4.6 What Whitehorse Biodiversity Remains 15 9.2.9 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • On the Flora of Australia
    L'IBRARY'OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY. BOUGHT. THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEING AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. r^/f'ORElGN&ENGLISH' <^ . 1859. i^\BOOKSELLERS^.- PR 2G 1.912 Gray Herbarium Harvard University ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION. I I / ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEIKG AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. Reprinted from the JJotany of the Antarctic Expedition, Part III., Flora of Tasmania, Vol. I. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1859. PRINTED BY JOHN EDWARD TAYLOR, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. CONTENTS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. § i. Preliminary Remarks. PAGE Sources of Information, published and unpublished, materials, collections, etc i Object of arranging them to discuss the Origin, Peculiarities, and Distribution of the Vegetation of Australia, and to regard them in relation to the views of Darwin and others, on the Creation of Species .... iii^ § 2. On the General Phenomena of Variation in the Vegetable Kingdom. All plants more or less variable ; rate, extent, and nature of variability ; differences of amount and degree in different natural groups of plants v Parallelism of features of variability in different groups of individuals (varieties, species, genera, etc.), and in wild and cultivated plants vii Variation a centrifugal force ; the tendency in the progeny of varieties being to depart further from their original types, not to revert to them viii Effects of cross-impregnation and hybridization ultimately favourable to permanence of specific character x Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection ; — its effects on variable organisms under varying conditions is to give a temporary stability to races, species, genera, etc xi § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Pollination Syndromes Useful Predictors of Floral Visitors
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Tasmania Open Access Repository Austral Ecology (2000) 25, 600–609 Are pollination syndromes useful predictors of floral visitors in Tasmania? ANDREW B. HINGSTON* AND PETER B. MC QUILLAN Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (Email: [email protected]) Abstract Diurnal visitors to the flowers of many native plant species were identified in a wide range of Tasmanian sclerophyllous vegetation between September 1996 and April 1997. These foraging profiles were analysed to determine whether they were characteristic of various floral morphologies in predictable ways. It was found that although visitor profiles were sometimes consistent with classic pollination syndromes, these syndromes were unre- liable predictors of floral visitors. Very few flowers were exclusively bird-pollinated, and none were strictly fly-, beetle-, wasp-, or butterfly-pollinated. The majority of flowering plants were unspecialized in their morphology, and consequently hosted a diverse array of visitors. In addition, visitor profiles to congeners with similar floral morphologies, and even to conspecifics, differed between habitats. Altitude was a major factor in determining visitors, with flies being the most abundant visitors above 700 m. However, congeners in several genera of Epacridaceae, as well as the genus Correa, which differed in floral morphology also differed in visitor profiles. Tubular flowers were associated with birds, while flowers with more accessible nectar were visited by insects. The only taxa exhibiting a bee-pollination syndrome that were largely visited by bees were the Fabaceae and Goodenia ovata Sm.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment Appendices A
    Biodiversity Assessment Rye Park Wind Farm APPENDICES APPENDIX A SPECIES LISTS AND TREE PLOT DATA ................................................................. A-- 1 - A.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................... A‐‐ 1 ‐ A.2 FAUNA .......................................................................................................................................... A‐‐ 8 ‐ A.3 HOLLOW‐BEARING TREE PLOT DATA ......................................................................................... A‐‐ 12 ‐ A.4 BIRD UTILISATION RAW DATA .................................................................................................... A‐‐ 20 ‐ A.5 SUPERB PARROT RAW DATA (TRANSECTS AND FLIGHT PATH MAPPING) ................................. A‐‐ 33 ‐ A.6 MICROBAT RISK ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................... A‐‐ 41 ‐ A.7 THREATENED SPECIES RECORDS ................................................................................................ A‐‐ 44 ‐ APPENDIX B THREATENED SPECIES EVALUATIONS ................................................................ B-- 1 - B.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................... B‐‐ 2 ‐ B.2 FAUNA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]