DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey on Violence Between Men and Women

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey on Violence Between Men and Women Survey on Violence between Men and Women 7th Global Forum on Gender Statistics November 2018 Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan XX University Background 2 Violence against women is a serious violation of human rights, and seriously impairs the formation of gender-equal society where men and women respect each other‘s dignity and promote establishment of an even relationship. Cases of damages caused by spouses or intimate friends, such as violence, sexual crimes and sexual violence, are becoming a serious social issue in Japan. Since such damages tend to be hidden, it is necessary to conduct a regular survey on a continuous basis, thereby correctly understanding the actual situation of violence. ※ In Japan, the “Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims” (established in 2001) and the “Fourth Basic Plan for Gender Equality" (determined in 2015) provide that efforts shall be made to research and study violence against women. The Japanese Government understands the actual situations of violence between men and women through a survey conducted every three years (which has been conducted seven times since FY1999, when the survey was started.) Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Overview of the survey 3 ■Name of the survey "Survey on Violence between Men and Women" ■Target of the survey ■How to conduct the survey 5,000 people (men and women) Questionnaire survey with random samples over the age of 20 throughout Japan (selectable from among mail survey, in-person survey and on-line survey) (4,500 people until FY2005) ※ Collection rate of the questionnaire ⇒ Approx. 68.7% (the average of the past seven surveys) ■Major survey items (1) Experience of receiving spousal violence ⇒ DV (2) Experience of receiving violence from an intimate friend ⇒ DV (3) Experience of being persistently approached, etc. ⇒ Stalker (4) Experience of being forced to have sexual intercourse, etc. ⇒ Sexual violence [ The survey results available at: http://www.gender.go.jp/policy/no_violence/e-vaw/chousa/h11_top.html ] Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Overview of the survey 4 ■Main survey contents - Have you ever become a victim? (type of violence, timing, relationship with the assailant, etc.) - Did you feel you might be killed when you were subject to violence? - Change of life after receiving violence - Situation of consultation after receiving violence (Did you consult anyone? If yes, whom? If no, why not?) etc. Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 5 (1) Violence by spouses Note: "Spouses" include ex-spouses (after divorce, bereavement or dissolution of de facto marriage), as well as de facto partners (without submission of a notification of marriage) and estranged spouses. Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (1) Violence by spouses 6 Ratio of respondents who have received violence from their spouse (%) Several times Once or twice F 13.8 17.5 M 4.8 15.1 F 5.3 14.5 Ratio of respondents who felt they Physical assault M 12.8 might be killed (%) 1.7 F 7.8 9.0 F 15.0 Psychological attack Per type of M 3.5 6.5 violence M 3.1 F 5.2 4.8 (Females: n=427) Economic pressure M (Males: n=223) 1.8 1.1 F Sexual extortion 3.8 5.9 (Females: n=1,366) M 1.3 (Males: n=1,119) 0.2 Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (1) Violence by spouses 7 Approx. one in three women who have had a spouse have received violence from the spouse. Approx. one in seven women have received violence several times. Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (1) Violence by spouses 8 Did you consult anyone about your damage? (%) Why didn't you consult anyone? (Only items with the most answers; %) Yes, I consulted someone No, I didn't consult anyone No answer It was so minor that I didn‘t F 54.6 have to consult anyone M 61.9 F 57.6 38.2 4.2 F 33.7 I thought that I was to blame M 34.8 M 26.9 69.5 3.6 I thought that it was no use F 25.2 consulting anyone M 19.4 Females: n=427 Males: n=223 I thought that it would be all F 31.3 right if I put up with violence M 12.9 The most respondents reply that they consulted "family members I didn't intend to part with F 19.6 Females: n=163 and relatives" or "friends and acquaintances". my spouse M 14.2 Males: n=155 Only a small percentage of respondents consulted the "police". Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 9 (2) Violence by intimate friends Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (2) Violence by intimate friends 10 Ratio of respondents who have received violence from their intimate friend (%) F 21.4 M 11.5 F 10.7 Ratio of respondents who felt Physical assault they might be killed (%) M 6.3 F 7.8 F 21.3 Psychological attack M 13.6 Per type of violence M 12.1 F 6.3 Economic pressure M 2.5 (Females: n=207) (Males: n=99) F 9.4 (Females: n=969) Sexual extortion M 2.1 (Males: n=864) Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (2) Violence by intimate friends 11 Did you consult anyone about your damage? (%) Why didn't you consult anyone? Yes, I consulted someone No, I didn't consult anyone No answer (Only items with the most answers; %) F 28.4 F 61.8 35.7 2.4 It was so minor that I didn't have to consult anyone M 38.5 I thought that it was no use F 23.0 M 43.4 52.5 4.0 consulting anyone M 19.2 I thought that it would be all right F 25.7 (Females: n=207) if I put up with violence M 15.4 (Males: n=99) F 17.6 I thought that I was to blame M 26.9 The most respondents reply that they consulted "family members and relatives" or "friends and acquaintances". I felt too embarrassed to consult anyone F 23.0 (Females: n=74) Only a small percentage of respondents consulted the "police". M 15.4 (Males: n=52) Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 12 (3) Damage from persistent approach, etc. Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (3) Damage from persistent approach, etc. 13 Ratio of respondents who have been persistently approached (%) Experience of damage from persistent F 10.9 approach, etc. M 4.5 I was persistently asked to see or F 7.2 go out with someone M 2.5 I was followed or ambushed F 7.0 M 2.2 Ratio of respondents who felt they might be killed (%) I was told that I was being monitored F 3.2 M 1.2 Per type of F Rude behavior 3.2 F 25.9 violence M 1.8 Silent phone calls and continuous F 5.9 email transmission M 2.5 M 27.1 Dirt, etc. was sent to me F 0.3 M 0.3 (Females: n=197) F I was dishonored 2.3 (Males: n=70) M 1.4 (Females: n=1,807) I was sexually insulted F 1.3 M (Males: n=1,569) 0.4 Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (3) Damage from persistent approach, etc. 14 Did you consult anyone about your damage? (%) Why didn't you consult anyone? (Only items with the most answers; %) Yes, I consulted someone No, I didn't consult anyone No answer It was so minor that I didn't F 33.3 F 81.2 18.3 0.5 have to consult anyone M 51.9 I thought that it was no use F 27.8 consulting anyone M 25.9 M 55.7 38.6 5.7 I thought that it would be all right F 22.2 if I put up with the damage M 11.1 (Females: n=197) (Males: n=70) I thought that, if anyone knew about F 16.7 the damage, my relationship with that M 14.8 person would never be the same again Compared with cases of DV, a larger percentage of F 16.7 respondents reply they consulted someone. I did not want to involve others (Females: n=36) M 11.1 (Males: n=27) Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 15 (4) Forced sexual intercourse, etc. Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (4) Forced sexual intercourse, etc. 16 Ratio of respondents who have been forced to have sexual intercourse, etc. (%) When were you victimized? (%) Before enrollment in F 2.8 M 4.3 F 7.8 elementary school When in elementary school F 12.1 M 13.0 M 1.5 (Females: n=1,807) (Males: n=1,569) When in junior high school F 5.7 M 8.7 After graduating from junior F 3.5 high school, before turning 17 M 17.4 Relationship with the assailant years old (only items with the most answers; %) F 14.9 18 or 19 years old M 8.7 F 26.2 Spouse or ex-spouse M F 8.7 20 to 29 years old 52.5 M 30.4 Intimate friend or former F 24.8 F intimate friend M 17.4 30 to 39 years old 21.3 M 26.1 People (excluding customers) at F 14.9 F 11.3 M 40 to 49 years old my workplace (including places 8.7 M 13.0 where I work part-time) F 11.3 (Females: n=141) F (Females: n=141) 50 years old or older 4.3 Total stranger M 13.0 (Males: n=23) M 8.7 (Males: n=23) Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Japan Survey results for FY2017 (4) Forced sexual intercourse, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Raising Awareness of Gender Equality Among Young People’
    EVALUATION REPORT FINAL EVALUATION OF THE UN WOMEN PROJECT ‘RAISING AWARENESS OF GENDER EQUALITY AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE’ EVALUATION REPORT FINAL EVALUATION OF THE UN WOMEN PROJECT ‘RAISING AWARENESS OF GENDER EQUALITY AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE’ JAPAN LIAISON OFFICE UN WOMEN Tokyo , April 10 © 20 20 UN Women. All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of UN Women, the United Nations or any of its affiliated organizations. Produced by UN Women Japan Liaison Office Prepared by Foundation for Advanced Studies on In- ternational Development (FASID) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ⅰⅰⅰ LIST OF TABLES ⅱⅱⅱ LIST OF FIGURES ⅲⅲⅲ LIST OF ANNEXES ⅴⅴⅴ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ⅵⅵⅵ 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES 1 1.3 APPROACHES 2 1.4 THEORY OF CHANGE 2 1.5 MAIN ACTIVITIES 3 1.6 STAKEHOLDERS 5 2. EVALUATION OVERVIEW 7 2.1 EVALUATION PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES 7 2.2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION 8 2.3 EVALUATION DESIGN AND GUIDELINES 8 2.4 METHODOLOGY 9 2.4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND EVALUATION MATRIX 9 2.4.2 INDICATORS FOR MEASURING RESULTS 9 2.4.3 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 11 2.4.4 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 12 2.4.5 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING DESIGN 12 2.4.6 ETHICAL CODE OF CONDUCT 13 2.5 LIMITATION TO THE EVALUATION 13 2.6 RESPONSIBILITIES 14 2.6.1 EVALUATION MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE 14 2.6.2 EVALUATION IMPLEMENTING STRUCTURE 15 3. EVALUATION FINDINGS 16 3.1 RELEVANCE 16 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS 18 3.2.1 OUTCOME ONE: AWARENESS OF GENDER EQUALITY INCREASED AMONG YOUTH, SHISEIDO AND GENERAL AUDIENCE 19 3.2.2 OUTCOME TWO: SKILLS AND CAPACITIES IN PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN INCREASED AMONG YOUTH 25 3.2.3 OUTCOME THREE: ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR ADVOCACY ACTIVITIES ON GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN 32 3.3 EFFICIENCY 38 3.4 SUSTAINABILITY 40 3.5 GENDER EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS 45 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Japan
    WOMEN IN JAPAN BASIC DEMOGRAPHICS POPULATION1 127,298,000 People % % 65 million 51 WOMEN MEN 49 62 million Population is expected to decrease by 32.3% by 20602 AGE RATIO3 13% 62% 25% 0–14 15–64 65+ YEARS YEARS YEARS WORKING AGE FERTILITY RATE4 PROPORTION5 People Age 65+ 1.4 1.7 25% 39% LIVE BIRTHS ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC PER WOMAN CO-OPERATION AND 2013 2050 DEVELOPMENT (OECD) AVERAGE TERTIARY ENROLLMENT6 43% 57% 13% 87% 66% 34% WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN TOTAL UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS HUMANITIES STUDENTS GRADUATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT7 30% 70% 33% 67% 28% 72% WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN WOMEN MEN MASTER’S PROGRAM PHD PROGRAM LAW SCHOOL LABOR FORCE EMPLOYMENT RATE8 61% WOMEN 57% OECD average—women 80% MEN 73% OECD average—men LABOR FORCE9 Non-Regular Employees Regular Employees (Part-time, Contract, Temporary, and Agency Dispatched) 44% 56% WOMEN 79% 21% MEN PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN PARTICIPATING IN THE LABOR FORCE BY AGE GROUP10 79 76.1 74.9 73.1 70.3 70.1 69.6 66.5 47.4 15.6 13.8 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65+ Male comparison Approximate time of marriage and children EMPLOYMENT STATUS11 UNDERUTILIZED LABOR FORCE12 After Pregnancy continued working 17% million women are not working, with maternity/parental leave 3 but would like to work 10% continued working without maternity/ % in age group % 53 44 parental leave 25-44 left job after % becoming 24 not employed pregnant 5% N/A GENDER WAGE GAP13 In 2013, women in regular employment earned: 16% OECD average gap % 73 WOMEN 27% GAP less than their male counterparts MEN PRESIDENTS14 BOARD DIRECTORS Of All Private and Public Of All Public Companies15 TOPIX Core 30 Index16 Companies 7.5% 1.6% 3.1% 2014 2012 2014 WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN MANAGEMENT Section Manager or Higher in Companies Section Manager or Higher The target year 2020 will coincide 17 18 With More Than 100 Employees in Companies with the return of the Olympics to Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Workplace Harassment Against Women and The
    Japanese Workplace Harassment Against Women and the Subsequent Rise of Activist Movements: Combatting Four Forms of Hara to Create a More Gender Equal Workplace by Rachel Grant A THESIS Presented to the Department of Japanese and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts June 2016 An Abstract of the Thesis of Rachel Grant for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of Japanese to be taken June 2016 Title: Japanese Workplace Harassment Against Women and the Subsequent Rise of Activist Movements Approved: {1 ~ Alisa Freedman The Japanese workplace has traditionally been shaped by a large divide between the gender roles of women and men. This encompasses areas such as occupational expectations, job duties, work hours, work pay, work status, and years of work. Part of this struggle stems from the pressure exerted by different sides of society, pushing women to fulfill the motherly home-life role, the dedicated career woman role, or a merge of the two. Along with these demands lie other stressors in the workplace, such as harassment Power harassment, age discrimination, sexual harassment, and maternity harassment, cause strain and anxiety to many Japanese businesswomen. There have been governmental refonns put in place, such as proposals made by the Prime Minister of Japan, in an attempt to combat this behavior. More recently, there have been various activist grassroots groups that have emerged to try to tackle the issues surrounding harassment against women. In this thesis, I make the argument that these groups are an essential component in the changing Japanese workplace, where women are gaining a more equal balance to men.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's New Roles in a Gender Equal Society
    Men’s New Roles in a Gender Equal Society -Survey Results from Japan and East Asia- As of 26 July, 2019 (Provisional Unedited ver.) Introduction The Sasakawa Peace Foundation began working on this program in the summer of 2016. The Global Gender Gap report, released by the World Economic Forum (WEF) around that time, puts Japan at 111th out of 144 countries covered. South Korea was the only East Asian country ranked lower (116th). Even if Southeast Asia is included, the only other country with lower ranking was East Timor (125 th). In the latest 2018 report, Japan climbed just one position to the 110th rank out of 149 countries, and remains far from establishing gender equality in society. What can we do to change this situation? We have focused on men’s persistent obsession with “masculinity.” While there are signs of change, Japanese men continue to perceive “masculinity” as getting ahead in the corporate ladder and winning in the power struggle. Such a male nature (= masculinity) might be causing Japanese men to put themselves under undue stress and pressure, while also hindering women’s empowerment and inhibiting the establishment of gender equality in society. We have come to believe that we might be able to contribute to building gender equality that is desirable for both men and women alike by establishing in-depth understanding about the current status and background of Japanese masculinity and developing effective gender policies and programs that could change it. Coincidentally, momentum is building to re-examine the role of men in family life and society in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Grußwort Zum Amtsantritt
    Mitteilungen des Japanisch-Deutschen Zentrums Berlin (JDZB) Nr. 134, März 2021 echo Grußwort zum Amtsantritt Yanagi Hidenao, Botschafter von Japan in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Am 7. Dezember letzten Jahres habe ich besucht und dort an Seminaren usw. mein Beglaubigungsschreiben dem Bun- teilgenommen. Schließlich reiste ich im despräsidenten Frank-Walter Steinmeier April 2014 aus Tōkyō an, um dort an einer überreicht und offiziell meinen Dienst Konferenz zum Thema Sicherheitspolitik als Botschafter angetreten. Nach einem teilzunehmen. Studium in Japan trat ich 1982 in das Außenministerium ein und erhielt die Auch in Deutschland halten die gravieren- Gelegenheit, zwei Jahre an der Universität den Auswirkungen der Corona-Pandemie Konstanz zu studieren. Danach folgten weiterhin an. Die Bundesregierung hat mehrere Auslandsverwendungen, u. a. daher am 19. Januar Maßnahmen zur an der Botschaft in Bonn und später in Stärkung des Schutzes vor Infektionen Berlin. Zusammen mit meiner Zeit als Ge- beschlossen, etwa eine Pflicht zum Tra- neralkonsul in München habe ich bisher gen medizinischer Masken sowie eine insgesamt über elf Jahre in Deutschland Ausweitung der Kontaktbeschränkungen. gelebt. Nachdem ich zuletzt knapp drei Auch der Lockdown, beispielsweise mit Jahre lang Botschafter in Jordanien war, ist geschlossenen Gaststätten und Geschäf- es für mich eine große Ehre und Freude, ten, dauert weiter an. Und auch wenn © Botschaft von Japan dass ich nun als Botschafter erneut in mit Beginn der Impfungen Ende letzten sellschaften, zu denen noch über 1.600 Deutschland tätig sein darf. Jahres nun erste Zeichen der Hoffnung Kooperationsabkommen zwischen den Was meine Beziehungen zum Japanisch- sichtbar werden, bleibt die Situation um Hochschulen unserer Länder kommen. Deutschen Zentrum Berlin (JDZB) anbe- Corona unbeständig und erlaubt keine Nun feiern wir in diesem Jahr „160 Jahre langt, so nahm ich im November 1987 voreilige Prognose.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Hawaiii Library a Path Toward Gender
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIII LIBRARY A PATH TOWARD GENDER EQUALITY: STATE FEMINISM IN JAPAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 2002 By Yoshie Kobayashi Dissertation Committee: Yasumasa Kuroda, Chairperson Kathy E. Ferguson James A. Dator KateZhou Takie S. Lebra ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many individuals and institutions for help with the writing of this dissertation. Singled out first for thanks are five professors at the University of Hawai'i, Manoa, who assisted me to shape the content of this dissertation. I am especially grateful to Yasumasa Kuroda, who was the supervisor of my dissertation and provided me essential intellectual and moral support and advice throughout the dissertation project. In a variety of ways, Kathy Ferguson's insightful criticism, comments, and copious and tireless editing during the dissertation process monitored the direction and clarified my arguments. James Dator and Kate Zhou were sources of substantive insight and personal encouragement throughout this dissertation project. I was also privileged to benefit from Takie S. Lebra's expertise in connecting a theoretical scheme with empirical findings. I also thank them for their support during my graduate school years. I appreciate the institutional support at the University of Hawaii, Manoa­ the Department of pOI~1 science and the Center for Japanese Studies. I gratefully acknowledge academic support from teachers of my undergraduate and master programs, although they were not directly involved in this work. For his comments and advice, I would like to express appreciations to Tanaka Yasumasa, who was my teacher of political science in GakushUin University, Tokyo and encouraged me to study in graduate programs in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • JAWW NGO Report for Beijing+25
    Preliminary JAWW NGO Report for Beijing+25 JAWW (Japan Women’s Watch) December 2019 i We, the members of the JAWW, dedicate this Report to the late Hiroko Hara. ii Table of Contents Preface ASANO, Mariko 1 A. Women and Poverty ABE, Aya 3 B. Education and Training of Women KAMEDA, Atsuko 5 C. Women and Health TSUGE, Azumi 9 YAKAHASHI, Sakino D. Violence against Women KAINO, Tamie 11 E. Women and Armed Conflict MOTOYAMA, Hisako 13 F. Women and the Economy SAITO, Etsuko 17 G. Women in Power and Decision-making MIURA, Mari 19 H. Institutional Mechanisms for the IWAMOTO, Misako 22 Advancement of Women I. Human Rights of Women OMI, Miho 25 J. Women and the Media TANIOKA, Rika 28 SANO, Atsuko K. Women and the Environment DOMOTO, Akiko 31 ODA, Yukiko L. The Girl-child ABE, Maki 34 P Youth KAWAI, Chihiro 37 Q. Women and Work NAITO, Shino 40 KOBAYASHI, Mitsuko R. Migrant Women YAMAGISHI, Motoko 43 OGAYA, Chiho S. Women with Disabilities DPI Women’s Network Japan 46 U Older Women KAMOZAWA, Saori 49 V. Agricultural, fishing and forestry NAKAMICHI, Hitomi 52 Women W. Minority JAPAN Alliance for LGBT Legislation 55 X. Disaster Risk Reduction Japan Women’s Network for Disaster 58 Risk Reduction (JWNDRR) List of Contributors 61 iii Preface Coming 2020 is a very special year for those involved in some form of gender equality and empowerment of women and girls. This is the 25th year since the 4th World Conference on Women (Beijing Conference) held in 1995. From the end of the 63rd United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (hereinafter CSW) held in March 2019 (New York), various assessment work is underway by governments, UN agencies, CSOs/NGOs and others with the key topics of “Bejing+25”.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Gender Equity in Japanese and Nordic Labour Markets: a Tale of Two Paths
    Towards Gender Equity in Japanese and Nordic Labour Markets: A Tale of Two Paths By Helinä Melkas* and Richard Anker** International Labour Office, Geneva July 2003 * Helsinki University of Technology, Lahti Centre, Institute for Regional Economics and Business Strategy. ** Former ILO Official. For more information on the InFocus Programme on Socio-Economic Security, please see the related web page http://www.ilo.org/ses or contact the Secretariat at Tel: +41.22.799.8893, Fax: +41.22.799.7123 or E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © International Labour Organization 2003 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE (Fax: +44 171436 3986), in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Centre, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 (Fax: +1 508 750 4470), or in other countries with associated Reproduction Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. ISBN 92-2-114289-2 First published 2003 The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality Policy in Japan
    Gender Equality Policy in Japan Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office Government of Japan Section 1 Basic Policy Framework for Gender Equality 1 Basic Policy Framework for Gender Equality the Basic Act for a Gender-equal Society (June 23, 1999) The Basic Plan for The Intensive Policy Gender Equality to Accelerate Women’s Empowerment ・ Every 5 years since 2000 • Every June since 2015 • Incorporate the perspective of The 1st Basic Plan (Dec.2000) FY2000 – FY2005 women’s empowerment into annual fiscal budget The 2nd Basic Plan (Dec.2005) FY2006 – FY2010 The Intensive Policy(June.2015) rd (Dec.2010) The 3 Basic Plan The Intensive Policy(June.2016) FY2011 – FY2015 ・ The 4th Basic Plan (Dec.2015) ・ FY2016 – FY2020 The Intensive Policy (June. 2019) The 5th Basic Plan FY2021 – FY2025 The Intensive Policy (2020) 2 National Machinery Structure for the Promotion of the Formation of a Gender-Equal Society Council for Gender Equality Headquarters for Creating a Liaison Conference for the - Study and deliberate on basic policies, Promotion of Gender Equality Society in which All Women measures and important matters Shine - Monitor the implementation status of - A network of collaboration and - Promote flexible coordination among government measures coordination comprised of intellectuals related government bodies to further - Survey the effects of government from all levels and sectors of society vitalize society through the full expression measures - Exchange information and opinions of the “power of women,” the greatest and promote national measures potential of the nation Chair Chief Cabinet Secretary President Members Prime Minister Members women's groups, media, economic organizations, Vice President 12 Cabinet Ministers 12 Intellectuals educational bodies, local Chief Cabinet Secretary governments, intellectuals, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Basic Plan for Gender Equality(Overview)
    The Fifth Basic Plan for Gender Equality(Overview) March, 2021 Government of Japan National Machinery for Gender Equality The Basic Act for Gender-Equal Society The Fifth Basic Plan for Gender Equality Promulgated and Enacted on 23 June, 1999 Decided by the Cabinet on Dec 25, 2020 Council for Gender Equality Headquarters for the Promotion of Gender Equality Basis: the Basic Act Established in the Cabinet Office Jan. 2001 Basis: Cabinet decision (July 1994) (One of the five important councils) Established in the Cabinet Office Members: Chief Cabinet Secretary (Chair) Members: Prime Minister (President) Relevant Ministers Chief Cabinet Secretary (Co-Vice President) Experts & Scholars Minister of State for Gender Equality (Co-Vice President) Mission: - Deliberate on basic policies and All other Ministers important matters - Monitor the implementation and Mission: Implementation of measures Study the impacts of all relevant measures from gender perspectives Civil Society ・ Liaison Conference for the Promotion of Gender Equality (CSOs’ network conference) Members: Experts &Scholars, Representatives from 98 CSOs Mission: wide-ranging collaboration and coordination, promote civil society initiatives 1 The Basic Act for Gender-equal Society The Fifth Basic Plan for Gender Equality The Basic Act for Gender-equal Society （Promulgated and Enacted on 23 June,1999） ■Responsibilities Basic Principles: Respect for the human rights of women and men ●Formulation of the Basic Plan for Gender Equality ● National Implementation of policies including Government
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality Policy in Japan
    August, 2017 Gender Equality Policy in Japan Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office Government of Japan The Outline of the ＳＤＧｓ Implementation Guiding Principles（provisional translation） Vision： Set out a vision for Japan to be the champion of sustainable and resilient society in which “ no one is left behind.” Japan intends to be a leader in creating a better future, in which the three dimensions of sustainable development, namely, economic, social, and environmental are improved in an integrated manner. Implementation Principles：(1)Universality, (2)Inclusiveness, (3)Participatory, (4)Integration, (5)Transparency and Accountability Follow‐up cycle：Expected to conduct a first follow‐up by 2019 【Eight Priority Areas and Policies】 (1) Empowerment of All People (2) Achievement of Good Health and Longevity ■Realization of Dynamic Engagement of All Citizens ■Promotion of ■Measures against Antimicrobial Resistance ■Enhancing Developing Women’s Role in Society ■Measures against Child Poverty Countries’ Health Sector and Improving Their Public Health and ■ Assistance to People with disabilities for Social Participation and Self‐ Measures against Infectious Diseases ■Tackling the Issues reliance ■Promotion of Quality Education Associated with Aging Populations in Asia (3) Creating Growth Market, Revitalization of Rural Areas, (4) Sustainable and Resilient Land Use, and Promoting Technological Innovation Promoting Quality Infrastructure ■Creating Markets with Potentials ■Revitalizing Villages around ■Creating Resilient Land and Promoting Disaster
    [Show full text]
  • Abe's Womenomics Policy, 2013-2020
    Volume 19 | Issue 4 | Number 4 | Article ID 5540 | Feb 15, 2021 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Abe’s Womenomics Policy, 2013-2020: Tokenism, Gradualism, or Failed Strategy? Mark Crawford quickly, we argued [in 1999] that the nation not only faced the risk of a further Abstract: Former Prime Minister Abe Shinzo decline in its productivity and potential left office with Japan’s “Womenomics” policy growth rate, but eventually, lower having fallen far short of its 2020 targets, and standards of living as well.” --Kathy with its greatest achievement, the increase in Matsui, Vice-Chair and Chief Strategist of female non-regular employment, largely Goldman Sachs Japan. (Emphasis added.) reversed by the COVID-19 recession. Although significant initiatives have been undertaken in the provision of childcare, tax reform, and parental leave policy, elite opinions within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, the government bureaucracy and the corporate sector militate against the mandatory regulations and political and social reforms that are still needed. These reforms are required because of the severity of Japan’s demographic and economic challenges, the limited political feasibility of mass immigration, and the deep Image Source: Savvy Tokyo structural inertia built into Japan’s employment system. Keywords: Abe, Abenomics, childcare, gender Abe’s Womenomics Policy in Historical equality, parental leave, Womenomics Context In 1999 a group of investment strategists at Goldman Sachs Japan led by Kathy Matsui applied the term ‘Womenomics’ to describe “Creating an environment in which women their recommended strategy for revitalizing the find it comfortable to work… is no longer a stagnant Japanese economy by “closing the matter of choice for Japan.
    [Show full text]