Gurdon Institute 20122011 PROSPECTUS / ANNUAL REPORT 20112010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gurdon Institute 20122011 PROSPECTUS / ANNUAL REPORT 20112010 The Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute 20122011 PROSPECTUS / ANNUAL REPORT 20112010 Gurdon I N S T I T U T E PROSPECTUS 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 http://www.gurdon.cam.ac.uk CONTENTS THE INSTITUTE IN 2011 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................3 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND..........................................................................................................4 CENTRAL SUPPORT SERVICES....................................................................................................5 FUNDING.........................................................................................................................................................5 RETREAT............................................................................................................................................................5 RESEARCH GROUPS.........................................................................................................6 MEMBERS OF THE INSTITUTE................................................................................44 CATEGORIES OF APPOINTMENT..............................................................................44 POSTGRADUATE OPPORTUNITIES..........................................................................44 SENIOR GROUP LEADERS.............................................................................................44 GROUP LEADERS.......................................................................................................................48 SUPPORT STAFF.....................................................................................................................50 INSTITUTE PUBLICATIONS.......................................................................................51 TALKS BY INSTITUTE RESEARCHERS.............................................................54 OTHER INFORMATION STAFF AFFILIATIONS.............................................................................................................58 HONOURS AND AWARDS........................................................................................................58 EDITORIAL BOARDS OF JOURNALS.............................................................................58 INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD...........................................58 CHAIRMAN OF MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE................................................58 LEAVERS DURING 2011................................................................................................59 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................................Inside back cover 2 THE GURDON INSTITUTE THE INSTITUTE IN 2011 INTRODUCTION As the reports from the individual research groups on the following pages demonstrate, 2011 has been another productive year for the Institute. The most notable changes have been the arrival of Dr Jenny Gallop as a new group leader, and the departure of Dr Masanori Mishima. Jenny joins us from Marc Kirschner’s group at Harvard Medical School, where she developed an in vitro model for the formation of cellular protrusions, such as filopodia. She has been awarded a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship and a European Research Council starting grant to study how membranes and actin regulators interact to control the assembly of various actin structures. Masanori is leaving us after six years in the Institute to become a Professor at the Centre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology that has just opened at the University of Warwick. We shall all miss him and his group very much, and wish them every success in their exciting new venture. We also said farewell to the staff of Mission Therapeutics, OMX photomicrograph of A dividing Primordial Germ cell (100x). GOF reporter, who had been provided space in the Institute for a year, while they set green; DAPI, blue. (Roopsha Sengupta, Surani Group, 2011) up their own laboratories. Mission Therapeutics is a new biotechnology the Royal Society’s Buchanan Medal “ in recognition of his distinguished company founded by Professor Steve Jackson to develop new contribution to medical sciences”, as well as a European Research anticancer treatments based on the work on DNA damage pathways Council Advanced Investigator award to support his research into coming out of his lab. DNA damage responses. Tony Kouzarides has also been awarded a As usual, the outstanding research of my colleagues has been European Research Council Advanced Investigator grant to study the recognised by various prizes and awards. Steve Jackson was awarded role of non-coding RNAs in transcription, and Azim Surani has won a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award to study the principles and programming of the mammalian germline. Phil Zegerman was awarded the Cancer Research UK Hardiman Redon prize 2010. Many other groups in the Institute have also secured new research funding, bringing our annual income from grants to over £12 million this year. Advanced imaging has always been one of the strengths of the Institute and 2011 has seen several important developments that will significantly improve our facilities in this area. For many years, the resolution of light microscopy was limited by diffraction, making it impossible to distinguish structures that are less than 200nm apart. A number of recent advances have now made it possible to resolve much smaller structures and the Institute has been awarded funding to invest in several systems that break the diffraction limit in different ways. Firstly, we have been awarded a Wellcome Trust equipment grant with other groups in Cambridge to purchase an OMX microscope that uses structured illumination to give twice the resolution of a standard light microscope. Secondly, Jenny Gallop has secured funding for a dSTORM (direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy) system that can resolve structures as small as 20nm, although it cannot image quickly. Separation of DNA (stained red with propidium iodide) between mother and Finally, my group has been awarded a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award daughter yeast cells. (Davide Mantiero & Vincent Gaggioli, Zegerman Group, 2011) to collaborate with groups at Yale and Oxford Universities and the THE GURDON INSTITUTE 3 THE INSTITUTE IN 2011 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology to develop the next generation of super-resolution microscopes that can image deep inside cells in real- time. Thus, the researchers in the Gurdon will be able to observe the behaviour of molecules in living tissues with unprecedented resolution, keeping us at the forefront of this rapidly moving field. Much of the success of the Institute depends on its friendly and cooperative atmosphere, and I would like to highlight the role played by Gurdon Institute Postdoc Association in enhancing the scientific and social life of the Institute. This year, the postdocs hosted research seminars from Titia de Lange (Rockefeller University), Marco Foiani (IFOM-IEO. Milan) and Anne Ridley (King’s College, London), as well as career talks by Jonathon Milner, a former Gurdon postdoc, now founder and CEO of Abcam, Pamela Feliciano, an associate editor of Nature Genetics, and Alison Schuldt who did her PhD in the Institute and is now chief editor of Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. They also held a one day postdoc retreat that included a collaboration networking event, a session on how to supervise students and a Total number of staff 1992 - 2011 barbecue. Most recently, the postdocs invited all of the core staff to a special beer and pizza ‘Happy Hour’ to thank them for all their work with how cells, including stem cells, acquire and maintain their normal ensuring the smooth running of the Institute. I am therefore delighted function, whereas cancer is a result of a cell breaking loose from its to announce that the President of the Postdoc Association, Benjamin correct controls and becoming abnormal. Both areas require a detailed Klapholz, has been awarded this year’s Martin Evans Memorial Cup, knowledge of intra- and intercellular processes, which need to be which is given annually to the person who has made the greatest analysed at the scientific and technical levels. To understand what goes contribution to the social life of the Institute. wrong when a cell becomes cancerous requires knowledge of the processes that ensure correct function in normal development. At the Next year marks the 21st anniversary of the founding of the Gurdon technical level, the analysis of cellular and molecular processes requires Institute (although we only adopted this name in 2004), and we are familiarity with techniques that no single person can master, including busy preparing for a special symposium and celebration to mark our coming of age. We have lined up a distinguished list of participants, including three Nobel laureates, and half of the speakers will be former students and postdocs in the Institute who have gone on to become very successful group leaders elsewhere. If you are interested in joining us for what I am sure will be a very exciting meeting, details for how to register can be found at www.gurdon.cam.ac.uk/symposium/. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The Institute was founded in 1989 to promote research in the areas of developmental biology and cancer biology, and is situated in the middle of the area containing the biological science departments of the University of Cambridge, close to the newly-established Wellcome Trust Institute
Recommended publications
  • Distinctive Regulatory Architectures of Germline-Active and Somatic Genes in C
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 7, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Distinctive regulatory architectures of germline-active and somatic genes in C. elegans Jacques Serizay, Yan Dong, Jürgen Jänes, Michael Chesney, Chiara Cerrato, and Julie Ahringer The Gurdon Institute and Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, CB2 1QN Cambridge, United Kingdom RNA profiling has provided increasingly detailed knowledge of gene expression patterns, yet the different regulatory ar- chitectures that drive them are not well understood. To address this, we profiled and compared transcriptional and regu- latory element activities across five tissues of Caenorhabditis elegans, covering ∼90% of cells. We find that the majority of promoters and enhancers have tissue-specific accessibility, and we discover regulatory grammars associated with ubiquitous, germline, and somatic tissue–specific gene expression patterns. In addition, we find that germline-active and soma-specific promoters have distinct features. Germline-active promoters have well-positioned +1 and −1 nucleosomes associated with a periodic 10-bp WW signal (W = A/T). Somatic tissue–specific promoters lack positioned nucleosomes and this signal, have wide nucleosome-depleted regions, and are more enriched for core promoter elements, which largely differ between tissues. We observe the 10-bp periodic WW signal at ubiquitous promoters in other animals, suggesting it is an ancient conserved signal. Our results show fundamental differences in regulatory architectures of germline and somatic tissue–specific genes, uncover regulatory rules for generating diverse gene expression patterns, and provide a tissue-specific resource for future studies. [Supplemental material is available for this article.] Cell type–specific transcription regulation underlies production tissues are achieved and whether expression is governed by dis- of the myriad of different cells generated during development.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Message
    Winter Issue 2013–2014 SOT News President’s Message I’m starting this President’s message with a quiz!!! It’s just one question, but it’s important that everyone knows the answer. The question is: What do prenatal programming and toxicity, perfluorinalkyl acids ,and human relevance of hemangiosarcomas in rodents have in common? [the answer appears at the end of this message]. While you ponder the answer to that question, I want to reflect on events of this fall and focus on several activities of the Society during recent times of uncertainty. The shutdown of the US government had some effect on nearly all of us. Important meetings, study sections, and day-to- day professional discussion and dialog were all furloughed during this time. However, the most significant impact was on our members who are government employees, and we can only hope that these matters are completely behind us. Unfortunately, there were significant deadlines for SOT matters scheduled during this time, particularly for abstract submissions and award President nominations. Lois D. Lehman- McKeeman I want to specifically acknowledge the work of the Scientific Program and Awards Committees for showing remarkable flexibility in modifying deadlines to accommodate member needs. As a quick review, the Awards committee moved deadlines for nominations to the last possible minute—giving them only about 1 week to review all nominations prior to meeting to select award winners. The prestigious Society awards are central to celebrating member accomplishments, and the work of this committee, against their own time limitations, underscores their commitment to this important activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Society for Developmental Biology 64Th Annual Meeting
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Developmental Biology 283 (2005) 537 – 574 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio Society for Developmental Biology 64th Annual Meeting Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, CA July 27–August 1, 2005 Organizing Committee: Judith Kimble (Chair, SDB President), Kathy Barton, Minx Fuller, Nipam Patel, Didier Stainier, Xin Sun, Bill Wood Local Organizers: Didier Stainier, Ida Chow Numbers in italics are program abstract numbers and names in bold are speakers. Poster assignments are listed at the end of the meeting program. Program Wednesday, July 27 9 am–5 pm Satellite Symposia (not organized by SDB) Segmentation Seacliff AB Co-organizers: Kenro Kusumi and Olivier Pourquie´ Molecular Biology of Plant Development Seacliff CD Organizer: Kathy Barton 12–7 pm Meeting Registration Grand Foyer Poster Session I and Exhibits Set-up Pacific Concourse See poster assignments at the end of the program 7–9 pm President’s Symposium Grand Ballroom Fundamental Problems of Developmental Biology Chair: Judith Kimble, University of Wisconsin-Madison and HHMI, Madison, WI 7:00 The soma-germline dichotomy. G. Seydoux. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 1 7:40 MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants and animals. D.P. Bartel. MIT and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 8:20 The genetics and genomics of evolving new traits in vertebrates. D. Kingsley. Stanford University and HHMI, Stanford, CA 9–11 pm Opening Reception in Honor of Eric Olson, Pacific Concourse Developmental Biology Editor-in-Chief, for invaluable service to the community Poster Session I and Exhibits Pacific Concourse See poster assignments at the end of the program YDBIO-02007; No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Model Organisms in the History of Mitosis Research
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The Role of Model Organisms in the History of Mitosis Research Mitsuhiro Yanagida Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan Correspondence: [email protected] Mitosis is a cell-cycle stage during which condensed chromosomes migrate to the middle of the cell and segregate into two daughter nuclei before cytokinesis (cell division) with the aid of a dynamic mitotic spindle. The history of mitosis research is quite long, commencing well before the discovery of DNA as the repository of genetic information. However, great and rapid progress has been made since the introduction of recombinant DNA technology and discovery of universal cell-cycle control. A large number of conserved eukaryotic genes required for the progression from early to late mitotic stages have been discovered, confirm- ing that DNA replication and mitosis are the two main events in the cell-division cycle. In this article, a historical overview of mitosis is given, emphasizing the importance of diverse model organisms that have been used to solve fundamental questions about mitosis. Onko Chisin—An attempt to discover new truths by checkpoint [SAC]), then metaphase (in which studying the past through scrutiny of the old. the chromosomes are aligned in the middle of cell), anaphase A (in which identical sister chro- matids comprising individual chromosomes LARGE SALAMANDER CHROMOSOMES separate and move toward opposite poles of ENABLED THE FIRST DESCRIPTION the cell), anaphase B (in which the spindle elon- OF MITOSIS gates as the chromosomes approach the poles), itosis means “thread” in Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic Description of an Endogenous Female State in C
    bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 27, 2016; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/083113. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Transcriptomic Description of an Endogenous Female State in C. elegans David Angeles-Albores1,y Daniel H.W. Leighton2,y Tiffany Tsou1 Tiffany H. Khaw1 Igor Antoshechkin3 Paul W. Sternberg1,* October 29, 2016 y These authors contributed equally to this work 1 Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA 2 Department of Human Genetics, Department of Biological Chemistry, and Howard Hughes Medical Insti- tute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 3 Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA * Corresponding author. Contact:[email protected] Abstract Understanding genome and gene function in a whole organism requires us to fully compre- hend the life cycle and the physiology of the organism in question. Although C. elegans is traditionally though of as a hermaphrodite, XX animals exhaust their sperm and become (en- dogenous) females after 3 days of egg-laying. The molecular physiology of this state has not been studied as intensely as other parts of the life cycle, in spite of documented changes in behavior and metabolism that occur at this stage. To study the female state of C. elegans, we designed an experiment to measure the transcriptomes of 1st day adult females; endoge- nous, 6th day adult females; and at the same time points, mutant feminized worms.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 Is Available in the Laboratory of Dr
    RNA Society Newsletter Aug 2016 From the Desk of the President, Sarah Woodson Greetings to all! I always enjoy attending the annual meetings of the RNA Society, but this year’s meeting in Kyoto was a standout in my opinion. This marked the second time that the RNA meeting has been held in Kyoto as a joint meeting with the RNA Society of Japan. (The first time was in 2011). Particular thanks go to the local organizers Mikiko Siomi and Tom Suzuki who took care of many logistical details, and to all of the organizers, Mikiko, Tom, Utz Fischer, Wendy Gilbert, David Lilley and Erik Sontheimer, for putting together a truly exciting and stimulating scientific program. Of course, the real excitement in the annual RNA meetings comes from all of you who give the talks and present the posters. I always enjoy meeting old friends and colleagues, but the many new participants in this year’s meeting particularly encouraged me. (Continued on p2) In this issue : Desk of the President, Sarah Woodson 1 Highlights of RNA 2016 : Kyoto Japan 4 Annual Society Award Winners 4 Jr Scientist activities 9 Mentor Mentee Lunch 10 New initiatives 12 Desk of our CEO, James McSwiggen 15 New Volunteer Opportunities 16 Chair, Meetings Committee, Benoit Chabot 17 Desk of the Membership Chair, Kristian Baker 18 Thank you Volunteers! 20 Meeting Reports: RNA Sponsored Meetings 22 Upcoming Meetings of Interest 27 Employment 31 1 Although the graceful city of Kyoto and its cultural months. First, in May 2016, the RNA journal treasures beckoned from just beyond the convention instituted a uniform price for manuscript publication hall, the meeting itself held more than enough (see p 12) that simplifies the calculation of author excitement to keep ones attention! Both the quality fees and facilitates the use of color figures to and the “polish” of the scientific presentations were convey scientific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Egg Laying Dynamics in Caenorhabditis Elegans
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Real-time egg laying dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Biomedical Engineering by Philip Vijay Thomas Dissertation Committee: Professor Elliot Hui, Chair Professor Olivier Cinquin Professor Abraham Lee 2015 c 2015 Philip Vijay Thomas TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v CURRICULUM VITAE vi ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION viii 1 Introduction and motivation 1 1.1 The impact of C. elegans in aging and lifespan studies along with current limitations . 1 1.2 Starvation and its effect on worms . 4 1.3 Microfabricated systems for C. elegans biology . 5 2 Real-time C. elegans embryo cytometry to study reproductive aging 7 2.1 High capacity low-weight passive bubble trap . 8 2.2 Microfluidic device layout . 10 2.3 Tuning habitat exit sizes to flush out embryos while retaining worms . 11 2.4 Equal flow resistance to make identical habitats . 12 2.5 Video enumeration of eggs . 13 2.6 Switching between discrete and continuously varying media concentrations . 15 3 Optimizing worm health in C. elegans microfluidics 17 3.1 E. coli densities of 1010 cells/mL maintain egg-laying in liquid worm culture 18 3.2 E. coli biofilms in devices . 19 3.3 Amino acid addition to S-media, γ irradiation of bacteria, and elevated syringe temperatures are ineffective in reducing biofilms in devices . 20 3.4 Use of a curli major subunit deletion strain significantly reduces biofilm in S-media . 23 4 Conclusions and future directions 26 Bibliography 30 ii A Appendix Title 41 A.1 Methods .
    [Show full text]
  • COMPASS Mediates Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance in Caenorhabditis Elegans
    COMPASS Mediates Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance in Caenorhabditis elegans By: Rosamund Clifford A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Faculty of Biological Sciences School of Biology Submission Date February 2021 Acknowledgements There are a great many people who have contributed to the development of this thesis, who I would like to thank here. Professor Ian Hope, who took on the role of my primary supervisor midway through my PhD and guided me through to the end with constant support and advice during the bulk of the experiments and entire writing process. My first PhD supervisor, Dr Ron Chen, whose ideas and support in the first two years gave me a solid foundation on which to build this thesis. Professor Mark Dickman and the Dickman group at the University of Sheffield, in particular Dr Eleanor Hanson, Dr Joby Cole and Dr Caroline Evans, for their technical expertise in LC-MS/MS and support with performing the experiments described here. Professor Julie Ahringer and the Ahringer group at the University of Cambridge, for their support with the immunofluorescence microscopy experiments, which I learned to do under the supervision of Yan Dong on a visit to the Ahringer lab. Thanks also to the imaging team at the Gurdon Institute, particularly Dr Nicola Lawrence, for training me to use a confocal microscope, and Dr Richard Butler, for writing the code that enabled analysis of the images. At the University of Leeds, my thanks go to Dr Ruth Hughes at the Bio-imaging facility for her advice on image analysis, and Dr Brittany Graham for helping me settle into the Hope lab.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Ref 6871 Response Sent 17 March Can You Please Provide The
    FOI Ref 6871 Response sent 17 March Can you please provide the following details from the most recent records which you hold under The Licensing Act 2003: On-trade alcohol licensed premises, including: Premises Licence Number Date Issued Premises Licence Status (active, expired etc.) Premises Name Premises Address Premises Postcode Premises Telephone Number Premises on-trade Category (e.g. Cafe, Bar, Theatre, Nightclub etc.) Premises Licence Holder Name Premises Licence Holder Address Premises Licence Holder Postcode Designated Premises Supervisor Name Designated Premises Supervisor Address Designated Premises Supervisor Postcode The information you have requested is held and in the attached. However the personal information relating to Designated Premises Supervisors you have requested is refused under the exemption to disclosure at Section 40(2) of the Act Further queries on this matter should be directed to [email protected] Full address Telephone number Licence type Status Date issued Licence holder 1 and 1 Rougamo Ltd, 84 Regent Street, Cambridge, 07730029914 Premises Licence Current Licence 10/03/2020 Yao Qin Cambridgeshire, CB2 1DP 2648 Cambridge, 14A Trinity Street, Cambridge, 01223 506090 Premises Licence Current Registration 03/10/2005 The New Vaults Limited Cambridgeshire, CB2 1TB 2nd View Cafe - Waterstones, 20-22 Sidney Street, Premises Licence Current Registration 17/09/2010 Waterstones Booksellers Ltd Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 3HG ADC Theatre, Park Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB5 01223 359547 Premises Licence
    [Show full text]
  • Ordered Proteolysis in Anaphase Inactivates Plk1 To
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central JCBArticle Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells Catherine Lindon and Jonathon Pines Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QR, England, UK e have found that key mitotic regulators show identified a putative destruction box in Plk1 that is required distinct patterns of degradation during exit from for degradation of Plk1 in anaphase, and have examined W mitosis in human cells. Using a live-cell assay for the effect of nondegradable Plk1 on mitotic exit. Our results proteolysis, we show that two of these regulators, polo-like show that Plk1 proteolysis contributes to the inactivation of kinase 1 (Plk1) and Aurora A, are degraded at different Plk1 in anaphase, and that this is required for the proper times after the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome control of mitotic exit and cytokinesis. Our experiments (APC/C) switches from binding Cdc20 to Cdh1. Therefore, reveal a role for APC/C-mediated proteolysis in exit from events in addition to the switch from Cdc20 to Cdh1 control mitosis in human cells. the proteolysis of APC/CCdh1 substrates in vivo. We have Introduction In animal cells, the regulated proteolysis of cyclin A, cyclin APC/C switches from its Cdc20- to Cdh1-activated form, or B1, and securin during mitosis are all essential for the proper whether they are degraded at distinct times, perhaps to coor- timing of events leading up to separation of sister chromatids dinate exit from mitosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Gurdon Institute 2010 PROSPECTUS / ANNUAL REPORT 2009
    The Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute 2010 PROSPECTUS / ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Gurdon I N S T I T U T E PROSPECTUS 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 2009 http://www.gurdon.cam.ac.uk THE GURDON INSTITUTE 1 CONTENTS THE INSTITUTE IN 2009 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................3 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND..........................................................................................................4 CENTRAL SUPPORT SERVICES....................................................................................................4 FUNDING...........................................................................................................................................4 RETREAT.................................................................................................................................................5 RESEARCH GROUPS.........................................................................................................6 MEMBERS OF THE INSTITUTE................................................................................38 CATEGORIES OF APPOINTMENT..............................................................................38 POSTGRADUATE OPPORTUNITIES..........................................................................38 SENIOR GROUP LEADERS.............................................................................................38 GROUP LEADERS.......................................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomically and Functionally Distinct Lung Mesenchymal Populations Marked by Lgr5 and Lgr6
    Anatomically and Functionally Distinct Lung Mesenchymal Populations Marked by Lgr5 and Lgr6 The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Lee, Joo-Hyeon et al. “Anatomically and Functionally Distinct Lung Mesenchymal Populations Marked by Lgr5 and Lgr6.” Cell 170, 6 (September 2017): 1149–1163 © 2017 The Authors As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2017.07.028 Publisher Elsevier BV Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116555 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Article Anatomically and Functionally Distinct Lung Mesenchymal Populations Marked by Lgr5 and Lgr6 Graphical Abstract Authors Joo-Hyeon Lee, Tuomas Tammela, Matan Hofree, ..., Tyler Jacks, Aviv Regev, Carla F. Kim Correspondence [email protected] (J.-H.L.), [email protected] (C.F.K.) In Brief Heterogeneous mesenchymal cell populations in the lung play a central role in epithelial maintenance and alveolar differentiation. Highlights d Lgr5 and Lgr6 mark mesenchymal cells in adult lungs d Single-cell transcriptome analysis defines mesenchymal heterogeneity d Distinct mesenchymal niches drive airway and alveolar differentiation d Wnt activity affects epithelial differentiation specified by mesenchymal cells Lee et al., 2017, Cell 170, 1149–1163 September 7, 2017 ª 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.028 Article Anatomically and Functionally Distinct Lung Mesenchymal Populations Marked by Lgr5 and Lgr6 Joo-Hyeon Lee,1,2,3,4,5,* Tuomas Tammela,6 Matan Hofree,7 Jinwook Choi,4 Nemanja Despot Marjanovic,6 Seungmin Han,4,8 David Canner,6 Katherine Wu,6 Margherita Paschini,1,2,3 Dong Ha Bhang,9 Tyler Jacks,6,10 Aviv Regev,6,7,10 and Carla F.
    [Show full text]