Chapter 12 the AMERICAS, AFRICA and ASIA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 12 the AMERICAS, AFRICA and ASIA Chapter 12 THE AMERICAS, AFRICA AND ASIA • Around 1500 European knowledge of the rest of the world expanded greatly. • Within thirty years the boundaries of Classical geography were shattered by the explorations of Christopher Columbus, followed by the first circumnavigation of the globe. • Near Eastern and Far Eastern art had been known since Roman times and motifs from Chinese and Islamic art had long been acclimatized in Europe. • But the art of the Americas was regarded in a very different light in that some were preserved as curiosities, yet most were destroyed. • Shortly before the end of the sixteenth century, the belief that Europe ‘was born to rule over Africa, Asia and America’ was fostered. Key Terms: Aztecs Mesoamerica oba Olmec Teotihuacan iwan Maya ooni Learning Objectives: • The differences in the use of head sculpture in Ife and Benin. • The similarities in the artwork of Mesoamerican cultures. • The different influences on Islamic art in India and in Spain. MESOAMERICA AND PERU • At the time of the Spanish invasion in 1519, the Aztecs ruled the area just north of modern Mexico City, south to Guatemala. • Their artistic style incorporated elements from earlier arts of the region which was occupied by groups of people who seem to have been nearly always at war with one another. • The Mesoamericans spoke a related language, used the same 260-day calendar, and had similar forms of governments which their religious beliefs were part of including blood- letting, the ball-game and sacrificial offerings of captives. Page 117 • The Mesoamerican cultures also shared techniques of building with stone, of carving with stone instruments, of modeling pottery, and of painting. Teotihuacan (fig. 12.1) • Around the first century AD, ceremonial center was developed east of present day Mexico City into a true city at a place the Aztecs would later call Teotihuacan, which means ‘where one becomes a god’. • The residential quarters were laid out on a grid system while the whole city was fixed astronomically to provide an earthly reflection of the heavenly bodies. • At the heart of an avenue were massive stepped platforms which were called ‘pyramids’ but actually resemble ziggurats in shape as well as in function. Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent (fig. 12.2) • At the southern end of the main avenue was a pyramid covered with elaborate carvings of plumed serpents and menacing heads which were enclosed in circles and squares. The Maya, Toltecs and Mixtecs • The Maya culture began somewhat earlier than Teotihuacan and reached the height of its development about the same time. • Their civilization, located on the Yucatan peninsula and in present day Belize and Guatemala, lasted a much longer time than that of Teotihuacan. • They developed a system of writing in symbols known as glyphs which have been deciphered to provide dates according to their calendar on which day 0 corresponds with August 13, 3114 BC. • The Maya believed that the gods created humans by a sacrificial act and therefore needed the reciprocal shedding of blood for their sustenance. • The two main rituals were the self-inflicted blood-letting performed by the rulers, human sacrifices of which the victims were the captives obtained through warfare. Stepped pyramid at Tikal (fig. 12.4) • Tikal, covering some 6 square miles, was one of the largest Maya city. • The buildings were arranged by astronomical observations. Page 118 • The courts for the ritual ball-games were built in all temple precincts and the rubber ball flying over the players’ head was to represent the sun. • From the beginning of the Maya ‘classical’ period they built with stone and a strong burnt lime cement and had also refined the corbelled arch technique. • The exterior of the temple was more important because all public rituals were performed in the open air. • This steep pyramid topped with a temple whose roof was called a roof comb and rises 230 feet with an unbroken flight of steps. Blood-Letting Rite (fig. 12.6) • This image is located on a lintel and shows King Shield Jaguar with the shrunken head of a sacrificial victim in his feathered crown. • The king is also shown holding a flaming torch over his principal wife as she kneels, pulling a cord knotted with thorns through her perforated tongue. Blood is seen dripping on to strips of paper that will be burnt and transmitted to the gods. • The figures are rigid in their poses and are set off by the hard-edged clarity of the composition. • This image was originally painted in bright colors of which only a trace remains. The Observatory, Chichén Itzá (fig. 12.8) • This structure is regarded as one of the most interesting in Mesoamerican architecture. • It is an observatory that encloses two concentric annular passages with high, corbelled vaults and an upper story reached by winding stairs. • From the center of the upper story are shafts that line up directly with the sun and stars. Chacmool from Chichén Itzá (fig. 12.9) • The statue, which may represent a deity, does not have a precedent in the art of the Maya. • The figure is a reduction of the human body into a geometric form resting on his elbows with his legs up and his hands in his lap. • In his hands is an offering tray but his head is turned away from the offering as if appearing indifferent. Page 119 Atlantean figures of Pyramid of Quetzalcoatl (fig. 12.10) • These columns are located on the summit of a temple and thought to have supported a wooden roof. • They represented warriors standing rigidly at attention, wearing butterfly pectorals and holding spear throwers in their hands. • The columns are identical. Each is composed of four drums, held together by dowels and originally painted in bright colors. Page from the Codex Zouche-Nuttall (fig. 12.11) • The Mixtecs became the dominant power in the second millennium AD in the south. • The finest examples of Mesoamerican manuscripts are Mixtec. They were painted on sheets of parchment and joined in long strips that could be folded into booklike form. • The figures are drawn in black outline and filled with bright colors and are shown frontally or in profile gesturing. • The manuscripts are concerned with rituals performed in accordance with the astronomical calendar. The Aztecs • Around 1370 the Aztecs settled on the island of Tenochtitlan in Lake Texcoco and were the last of a succession of northern tribes to infiltrate the Valley of Mexico. • Their palaces and gardens impressed the Europeans, yet the Aztecs’ practice of human sacrificing appalled the new arrivals. • As with previous cultures the Aztec paid close attention to astronomical events and their practice of sacrificing was tied to these events. • It is thought that the Aztecs sacrificed thousands of their own people with the rumor that the hearts of some 20,000 were torn out on a single occasion. Goddess Coatlicue (fig. 12.15) • In this statue the goddess is dehumanized, yet presented in a terrifying manner. • She is represented with two rattlesnake heads, serpent fangs at her elbows, a skull hanging from a necklace of human hands, hearts above her breasts, a skirt of entwined snakes, and her feet are feline claws. Page 120 The Incas • By about 1500 the Incas occupied the whole length of the Andes from modern Ecuador to Bolivia, Argentina and southern Chile. Portrait vessel (fig. 12.16) • The Incas’ most distinctive artistic products were the well- made pottery vessels with stirrup-shaped spouts. This type was particular to South America. • All of the vessels were probably made to be included in the tombs • This vessel is shaped like a human head, strongly characterized and very realistic. • The faces ponder, frown or sneer in high disdain. AFRICA • Unlike America, Africa was not cut off from Europe. • The Atlantic coast cities of West Africa were linked to the Mediterranean by trade routes across the Sahara. • Religion followed commerce and before 1100 Islam had spread as far as Mali. • The Portuguese mariners sailed down the Atlantic coast in 1471 and in 1498 rounded the Cape and up the east coast of Africa. • The Europeans were not able to gain more than coastal footholds until the late nineteenth century. • The history of Africa south of the Sahara is difficult to trace due in part to the lack of written records. • The artwork found at Ife is very different from European art and it is believed that the styles found in western Africa were indigenous. Head of a queen (fig. 12.22) • At Ife, an important religious and political center in present day Nigeria, a predominantly figurative style emerged. • The heads were very naturalistic, as is seen in this one of a queen. • The queen’s headdress is rendered in detail. • She is shown with a high brow and a sensitive mouth, which has a slight ridge at the outer edges. • Her upper eyelids overlap the lower ones at the corners. Page 121 Head of an ooni (fig. 12.23) • Several other heads are done in the same style as the queen’s, yet are individualized in such a manner to suggest that they were intended to be portraits. • The holes around the mouth were thought to hold a veil of beads during certain ceremonies. A queen mother, Benin (fig. 12.26) • The sculpted heads found at Benin are much more stylized than those of Ife. The oba of Benin in divine aspect (fig. 12.28) • The idea for these plaques may have come from European printed book illustrations. • The figures are frontally posed and scaled according to importance. • This plaque shows an oba displaying his power over two leopards.
Recommended publications
  • Architecture and the Representations of Kingship During the Reign of the Safavid Shah ʿabbas I
    ARCHITECTURE AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF KINGSHIP DURING THE REIGN OF THE SAFAVID SHAH ʿAbbAS I Kishwar Rizvi Authority in Islamic cultures was conceived of as being both imperial and theocratic. The caliph or sultan was given the title “shadow of God on Earth” and his role was to uphold the law and dispense justice in a manner that assured loyalty toward his leadership and harmony through- out his dominions. The person of the sultan was universally believed to be the repository of ultimate power, yet the way in which this power was represented varied according to specific geographic and historical criteria. In all cases, however, the ruler’s rightly-guided authority was formulated through judicial, military, and artistic means. That is, the representation of power was constructed by clerics, historians, poets, painters and archi- tects of the court. This imperial image was monumentalized through his- torical compendia, architecture and the arts of the book, which have left us ample material through which the vision and, occasionally, the person- ality, of a ruler may be studied. The early modern period in Islamic history is full of the names and exploits of great kings, from Timur Lang (Tamerlane) to Mehmet the Con- queror. In the sixteenth century the reigns of three kings stand out, namely that of Suleyman (r. 1520–66) in Ottoman Turkey, Akbar (r. 1556–1605) in Mughal India, and ʿAbbas I (r. 1587–1629) in Safavid Iran. All three are renowned for the manner in which they defined their respective empires through the patronage of works of art and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies and Sources in Islamic Art and Architecture
    STUDIES AND SOURCES IN ISLAMIC ART AND ARCHITECTURE SUPPLEMENTS TO MUQARNAS Sponsored by the Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. VOLUME IX PREFACING THE IMAGE THE WRITING OF ART HISTORY IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY IRAN BY DAVID J. ROXBURGH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 2001 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roxburgh, David J. Prefacing the image : the writing of art history in sixteenth-century Iran / David J. Roxburgh. p. cm. — (Studies and sources in Islamic art and architecture. Supplements to Muqarnas, ISSN 0921 0326 ; v. 9) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 9004113762 (alk. papier) 1. Art, Safavid—Historiography—Sources. 2. Art, Islamic—Iran– –Historiography—Sources. 3. Art criticism—Iran—History—Sources. I. Title. II. Series. N7283 .R69 2000 701’.18’095509024—dc21 00-062126 CIP Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Roxburgh, David J.: Prefacing the image : the writing of art history in sixteenth century Iran / by David J. Roxburgh. – Leiden; Boston; Köln : Brill, 2000 (Studies and sources in Islamic art and architectue; Vol 9) ISBN 90-04-11376-2 ISSN 0921-0326 ISBN 90 04 11376 2 © Copyright 2001 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Inch a King
    Every Inch a King Comparative Studies on Kings and Kingship in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds Edited by Lynette Mitchell Charles Melville LEIDEN •• BOSTON 2013 © 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV ISBN 978-90-04-22897-9 CONTENTS List of Illustrations ........................................................................................... vii Notes on Contributors .................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... xvii “Every Inch a King”. Kings and Kingship in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds ................................................................................. 1 Lynette Mitchell and Charles Melville Defijining the Divine in Achaemenid Persian Kingship: The View from Bisitun .............................................................................. 23 Margaret Cool Root Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Fictive History, Political Analysis and Thinking with Iranian Kings ........................................................... 67 Christopher Tuplin Alexander the Great: Divinity and the Rule of Law .............................. 91 Lynette Mitchell Seleucus I, Zeus and Alexander ................................................................... 109 Kyle Erickson Machiavelli and Xenophon’s Cyrus: Searching for the Modern Conceptions of Monarchy ........................................................................ 129 Waller R. Newell Ruling “Virtually”? Royal Images in Medieval English Law Books
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Caspian
    Crossing the Caspian PERSIA AND EUROPE 1500–1700 Crossing the Caspian PERSIA AND EUROPE, 1500–1700 Fig. 1 Johann Baptist Homann (Germany, 1663–1724), Map of the Persian Provinces of Gilan, Shirvan, and Dagestan (Provinciarum persicarum Kilaniae nempe Chirvaniae Dagestaniae), 1728. 1 1 Map, 18 ⁄2 × 22 ⁄16 in. Courtesy of Stanford University, David Rumsey Map Center Crossing the Caspian PERSIA AND EUROPE, 1500–1700 ALEXANDRIA HEJAZI TSAGARIS In 1728, the Nuremberg print shop of Johann Baptist Homann issued a revolutionary map of the Caspian Sea and its coastal Persian provinces (fig.1 ). Homann’s map was one of the first to accurately represent the shape of the Caspian, the world’s largest inland body of water, in the area surrounded by what we now know as Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Iran. Up until that point, cartographers had depicted it as a wide, vague oval, as in a 1634 example by Willem Janszoon Blaeu (fig. 2).1 The cartographic misperception carried on so long due to the simple fact that, until the 17th century, the Caspian remained an untraveled and mysterious waterway. Mapmakers like Blaeu—then the most sought-after cartographer in the Netherlands—still referenced Ptolemy’s ancient geographic atlases for templates of Caspian lands. But in 1600, this changed. In contrast to the empty sea in Blaeu’s map, the constellation of ships in the version by Homann demonstrate the emergence of the Caspian as a major water route between Persia and Europe. Ambassadors and merchants crossing it gathered direct knowledge of the sea as they navigated to and from the coasts of Persia.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials and Techniques of Islamic Manuscripts Penley Knipe1, Katherine Eremin1*, Marc Walton2, Agnese Babini2 and Georgina Rayner1
    Knipe et al. Herit Sci (2018) 6:55 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-018-0217-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Materials and techniques of Islamic manuscripts Penley Knipe1, Katherine Eremin1*, Marc Walton2, Agnese Babini2 and Georgina Rayner1 Abstract Over 50 works on paper from Egypt, Iraq, Iran and Central Asia dated from the 13th to 19th centuries were examined and analyzed at the Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies. Forty-six of these were detached folios, some of which had been removed from the same dispersed manuscript. Paintings and illuminations from fve intact manuscripts were also examined and analyzed, although not all of the individual works were included. The study was undertaken to better understand the materials and techniques used to create paintings and illuminations from the Islamic World, with particular attention paid to the diversity of greens, blues and yellows present. The research aimed to determine the full range of colorants, the extent of pigment mixing and the various preparatory drawing materials. The issue of binding materials was also addressed, albeit in a preliminary way. Keywords: Islamic manuscript, Islamic painting, XRF, Raman, FTIR, Imaging, Hyperspectral imaging Introduction project have been assigned to a particular town or region An ongoing interdisciplinary study at the Harvard Art and/or are well dated. Examination of folios from a single Museums is investigating the materials and techniques manuscript, including those now detached and dispersed used to embellish folios1 from Islamic manuscripts and as well as those still bound as a volume, enabled investi- albums created from the 13th through the 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulru Necipoglu
    Gülru Necipoğlu, ‘The Concept of Islamic Art: Inherited Discourses and New Approaches’, originally published in Benoît Junod, Georges Khalil, Stefan Weber and Gerhard Wolf, eds, Islamic Art and the Museum, London: Saqi Books, 2012 Abstract The article examines the shift in the field, since the 1970s, from a predominant focus on the early period of Islamic art and architecture in the ‘central zone’ of the Fertile Crescent to a broader chronological and geographical scope. This shift has contributed, among other things, to a change of emphasis from artistic unity to variety, accompanied by an increasing diversification of concepts and approaches including dynastic, regional, media-based, textual, theoretical, critical, and historiographical inquiries. The article seeks to address the unresolved methodological tensions arising from the expanded scope of the field, along with concomitant anxieties over the fragmentation of its traditional ‘universalism’. It begins by outlining the premises of still prevalent approaches inherited from the construction of the field during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, a field rooted in the entangled legacies of Orientalism, nationalism, and dilletantism. The article then reviews recent statements on the state and future of the field before turning to personal reflections on challenges posed by its expanding horizons and its relationship to the Museum. Bio Gülru Necipoğlu has been Aga Khan Professor of Islamic Art and Director of the Aga Khan Program of Islamic Architecture at the Department of History of Art and Architecture in Harvard University since 1993, where she earned her PhD in 1986. She specializes in the medieval and early modern periods, with a particular focus on the Mediterranean basin and the Eastern Islamic lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Roxburgh CV 8 2017
    CURRICULUM VITAE DAVID J. ROXBURGH Department of History of Art and Architecture Harvard University 485 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02318 Tel: 617 496 1056 Fax: 617 495 1769 [email protected] EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1988–1996. Department of the History of Art. A.M. December 1991; Ph.D. August 1996. The University of Edinburgh and Edinburgh College of Art, 1983–88. M.A. in Fine Art, summa cum laude. Degree program combined studio (sculpture) and history of art. AWARDS AND PRIZES Mohamed Zakariya: Calligrapher, project development, dvd, Ó MFA Houston 2007, New York Short Film Festival, Official Selection, 2008. Saidi Sirjani Book Award, Honorable Mention for The Persian Album, granted biennially by the International Society for Iranian Studies on behalf of the Persian Heritage Foundation, 2006. Walter Channing Cabot Fellow, Harvard University, 2006–07. Choice Outstanding Academic Titles award for The Persian Album, 2006. Shortlist for The Art Newspaper and AXA Art Best Exhibition Catalogue 2005 (for Turks), 2005. M.A., honoris causa, Harvard University, 2003. Best Dissertation in Iranian Studies (first prize) awarded by the Foundation for Iranian Studies, Washington, D.C., 1996. Dean’s Scholar, 1994–95. Dean’s Forum of the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. FELLOWSHIPS AND GRANTS Anne and Jim Rothenberg Fund for Humanities Research, Harvard University, 2016. Al-Sabah Collection, Dar al-Athar al-Islamiyya, Kuwait, publication grant (for Envisioning Islamic Art and Architecture), 2014. Aga Khan Award for Architecture, publication grant (for Envisioning Islamic Art and Architecture), 2014. Clarke-Cooke Research Fund, Harvard University, 2001, 2006, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia – Georgia – Islam: a Need to Break Taboos in the Study of Medieval Architecture
    Armenia – Georgia – Islam : A Need to Break Taboos in the Study of Medieval Architecture Patrick Donabédian To cite this version: Patrick Donabédian. Armenia – Georgia – Islam : A Need to Break Taboos in the Study of Medieval Architecture. Aldo Ferrari; Stefano Riccioni; Marco Ruffilli; Beatrice Spampinato. L’arte armena : Storia critica e nuove prospettive Studies in Armenian and Eastern Christian Art 2020, 16, Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, pp.62-112, 2020, Eurasiatica, 978-88-6969-495-0. 10.30687/978-88- 6969-469-1/005. halshs-03177703 HAL Id: halshs-03177703 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03177703 Submitted on 23 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. L’arte armena. Storia critica e nuove prospettive Studies in Armenian and Eastern Christian Art 2020 a cura di Aldo Ferrari, Stefano Riccioni, Marco Ruffilli, Beatrice Spampinato Armenia – Georgia – Islam A Need to Break Taboos in the Study of Medieval Architecture Patrick Donabédian Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LA3M, Aix-en-Provence, France Abstract Two important spheres of the history of medieval architecture in the Ana- tolia-Armenia-South-Caucasian region remain insufficiently explored due to some kind of taboos that still hinder their study.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiesof Ornament
    HISTORIES of ORNAMENT FROM GLOBAL TO LOCAL Edited by GÜLRU NECIPOĞLU and ALINA PAYNE With contributions by María Judith Feliciano Alina Payne Michele Bacci Finbarr Barry Flood Antoine Picon Anna Contadini Jonathan Hay David Pullins Thomas B. F. Cummins Christopher P. Heuer Jennifer L. Roberts Chanchal Dadlani Rémi Labrusse David J. Roxburgh Daniela del Pesco Gülru Necipoğlu Hashim Sarkis Vittoria Di Palma Marco Rosario Nobile Robin Schuldenfrei PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Anne Dunlop Oya Pancaroğlu Avinoam Shalem Princeton and Oxford Marzia Faietti Spyros Papapetros and Gerhard Wolf Copyright © 2016 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu {~?~Jacket/cover art credit here, if needed} All Rights Reserved Library of Congress CataLoging-in-PubLiCation Data Histories of Ornament : From Global to Local / Edited by Gulru Necipoglu and Alina Payne ; With contributions by Michele Bacci, Anna Contadini, Thomas B.F. Cummins, Chanchal Dadlani, Daniela del Pesco, Vittoria Di Palma, Anne Dunlop, Marzia Faietti, Maria Judith Feliciano, Finbarr Barry Flood, Jonathan Hay, Christopher P. Heuer, Remi Labrusse, Gulru Necipoglu, Marco Rosario Nobile, Spyros Papapetros, Oya Pancaroglu, Alina Payne, Antoine Picon, David Pullins, Jennifer L. Roberts, David J. Roxburgh, Avinoam Shalem, Hashim Sarkis, Robin Schuldenfrei, and Gerhard Wolf. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-16728-2 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Decoration and ornament, Architectural. I. Necipoglu, Gulru, editor. II. Payne, Alina Alexandra, editor. NA3310.H57 2016 729.09—dc23 2015022263 British Library Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Vesper Pro Light and Myriad Pro Printed on acid- free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Arts of Isfahan: Diversity and Identity in Seventeenth-Century
    BOOK ARTS OF ISFAHAN I S F A Diversity and Identity in Seventeenth-Century Persia Book Arts of H A N Alice Taylor TheJ. Paul Getty Museum Malibu, California © 1995 The J. Paul Getty Museum Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Title page illustrations (left to right): 17985 Pacific Coast Highway Publication Data Details ofShiru and Queen Mahzad in Her Malibu, California 90265-5799 Taylor, Alice, 1954- Gardens (pi. 9); An Armenian Bishop (pi. 5); Book arts of Isfahan: diversity and identity and Saint John Dictating His Gospel to Published on the occasion in seventeenth-century Prochoros (pi. 22). of an exhibition at Persia/Alice Taylor. The J. Paul Getty Museum p. cm. Front cover: October 24,1995-January 14,1996. Exhibition to be held Saint John Dictating His Gospel to Oct. 24,1995-Jan. 14, 1996 Prochoros. Mesrop of Khizan; Isfahan, 1615. Christopher Hudson, Publisher at the J. Paul Getty Museum. Fol. I93v of a Gospel book. JPGM, Ms. Mark Greenberg, Managing Editor ISBN 0-89236-362-2 (cloth) Ludwig II 7. John Harris, Editor ISBN 0-89236-338-x (paper) Leslie Thomas Fitch, Designer 1. Illumination of books and manuscripts, Back cover: Stacy Miyagawa, Production Coordinator Iranian—Iran—Isfahan—Exhibitions. Details of A Bearded Man Reading in a Charles Passela, Photography 2. Illumination of books and Landscape (pi. 2); Saint John Dictating Robert Hewsen, Map Designer manuscripts—Iran—Isfahan— His Gospel to Prochoros (pi. 22); and Shiru Exhibitions. 3. Illustration of books— and Queen Mahzad in Her Gardens (pi. 9). Typeset by G &. S Typesetters, Inc., 17th century—Iran—Isfahan— Austin, Texas Exhibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal and the Popular in Early Safavid Art 67 the Royal and the Popular in Early Safavid Art Iván Szántó
    The Royal and the Popular in Early Safavid Art 67 The Royal and the Popular in Early Safavid Art Iván Szántó A significant difference between the established academic discourse on European and Persian art history is that while the former generally uses stylistic criteria for creat- ing its chronological framework (e.g., Romanesque, Gothic, Renaissance, and Baroque periods), the latter refers to dynasties (e.g., Seljuq, Il-Khanid, Timurid, and Safavid periods) for the same purpose.1 This clearly indicates that modern Persian art scholar- ship, as it has developed in Europe, is actually an offshoot of Persian historiography. But how can one describe the style of a period which is delimited merely by the rise and fall of a dynasty? Is it legitimate to attribute stylistic characteristics to the Timurid, Turkoman or Safavid periods by naming the concurrent artistic production as Timu- rid, Turkoman or Safavid art respectively? Of course these categories cannot be com- pared to such terms as Renaissance or Baroque art, yet it remains true that dynastic changes often induce shifts in existing cultural norms. From where do they come and why? What was their repository prior to their manifestation? And why do they appear at a given historical moment? These questions are not easy to answer yet they appear regularly, for instance, in Safavid studies, as the takeover of Shah Esmācīl I in Iran (AD 1501) ushered in several long-lasting innovations. The present paper attempts to discuss some of these problems in the realm of art history. It is common knowledge that the Safavid state, like hegemonist rulerships in general, sought distinctive religious and cultural features.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Enamels (Minakary) History Sajedeh Norouzi* Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, University Federal of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
    ial Scien oc ce S s Norouzi, Arts Social Sci J 2017, 8:4 d J n o u a r DOI: 10.4172/2151-6200.1000299 s n t a r l A Arts and Social Sciences Journal ISSN: 2151-6200 Review Article Open Access Iranian Enamels (Minakary) History Sajedeh Norouzi* Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, University Federal of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Abstract This article is about the Iranian enamels history with scrutiny the history of metal in Iran. It was checked in two parts: before Islam and after Islam in Iran. The Iranian enamels history was checked before Islam in Medes, Achaemenid and Sasanid ages, and after Islam in Seljuq, Safavid, Qajar ages. Keywords: Minakary; Metal; Copper; History civilization shows that has begun metalworking industry in Babylon, Oxus, India and Egypt are of the second half of the forth millennium Introduction BC. Researchers have discovered tow objects in Silk hill near to Kashan For a detailed review of the history of minakary art in Iran we that their life estimated between four thousand to four thousand five need to examine the history of metal detection be mankind. Where hundred years BC that objects have known as the oldest objects that was discovered metal? And how could artists soft to this hard objects discovered in Iran. The copper objects discovered in Eblis hill near to and work on it.The oldest works of art that human has created been Lalaeh Zar river in a hundered kilometers southwest of Kerman that discovered in a fertile region of the middle east that from the north, their life estimated about four thousand eighty – three years BC [1].
    [Show full text]