DOCSLIB.ORG

Support to Local and Regional Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Osmankovic, Jasmina Conference Paper Support to Local and Regional Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Enlargement, Southern Europe and the Mediterranean", August 30th - September 3rd, 2006, Volos, Greece Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Osmankovic, Jasmina (2006) : Support to Local and Regional Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Enlargement, Southern Europe and the Mediterranean", August 30th - September 3rd, 2006, Volos, Greece, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/118178 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 1 TITLE: SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Abstract: the abstract for paper no. 57 NAME: JASMINA OSMANAGIĆ, PHD Faculty of Economics, Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Phone: +387 33 27 59 19 E-mail: [email protected] Mirko Pejanović, PhD FPN University of Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 29 58 59 Klelija Balta UNDP 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 10 42 20 2 SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND ABSTRACT The paper is a review European Commission support for local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1999 to 2006. In focus are The Quick Impact Facility Project Phase I (QIF 1) 1999-2002, European Union- Quick Impact Facility Project Phase II (EUQIF II) 2002-2004, European Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase I (EU RED I) 2004-2005 and Europe Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase II (EU RED II) 2005-2007). The paper contents background information, previous assistance, other related programmes, European Commission funded projects, non European Commission funded projects, definition on participants, target groups or beneficiaries, employed domicile populations, start situation, objectives, scope of work, methodology and approach, transparency, visibility, expected outputs and indicators, funds or budget, reporting, monitoring and evaluation. The paper presents knowledge transfer about local and regional theories and policies from experts European Commission to local experts. The paper shows funds. (Regional Development in Tuzla 1.2 Million Euro, Regional Development in Brcko 1.0 Million Euro, Mostar Economic Development 500.000 Euro, Sarajevo Economic Region 200.000 Euro, Quick Impact Facility 5.5 Million Euro, Foreign 3 Investment Promotion 1.0 Million Euro, European Fund 55 Million Euro, specific activities 3,200.000 Euro and Project Fund 3,800.000 Euro, EUQIF II about 3 Million Euro, etc) and benefits for EU and B&H. In the end, the paper presents cost-benefit analysis, and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats this projects and message for future projects support for local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina and other developing countries 1. Introduction The first post-war document, that had the ambition to offer elements of consistent strategy on the macroeconomic development, in co-operation with the UNDP experts in 1996, clearly underlined the importance, needs and benefits of regional development. Experts, institutions and organisations from the European Union, Canada, United States, as well as several other countries, expressed their interest in the local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Therefore, the BH and international scientific institutions and individuals recognised this issue as both interesting and profitable. Bosnia and Herzegovina, like many other developing countries, was offered the “regional development” as the new brand, new product and a new instrument. Without the intention to name all those who turned up in Bosnian market in this context, this paper will try to give an overview of some of the programmes. The intention is to present the correlation between money and value, intent and accomplishments, wishes and consequences. 4 Furthermore, as a starting point it uses the pre-war experiences in regional development of Bosnia and Herzegovina, its current territorial organisation and presence of regional development in strategic documents. Further on, it will offer an overview of the projects EU QIF and EU RED I, within the limited space given to the authors. One should bear in mind that, in short, the project of regional development is being implemented in the environment of multiple and successive transitions, where the conditions are determined by the facts that 19,5% of the population lives below poverty line of 1 USD per day, the unemployment rate is as high as 43%, according to the official statistical information, all or at least most of the critical issues regarding the Constitution and territorial organisation are being discussed, the differences in development within the country are evident and visible development is not balanced nor harmonised. 2. The experience of Bosnia and Herzegovina Until the early 1990s, Bosnia and Herzegovina was one of the six socialist republics within the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia. As given in the name itself, the country was socialist, or more precisely a self-governing socialist republic in a federation with five more republics. It is a social system in which the management of all or most issues were entrusted to the equal members of an organisation or community. It is often being identified with a socialist state. The system was characterised by the state being in charge of property, planning, management and disposition of the results, the certainty of a gotten permanent employment, public health, social and retirement security, right to acquire proper housing, and availability of all levels of education (Lexicon of Economics). The right to be involved in governing and decision-making according to one’s work, as the only determining factor of 5 value (the labour theory of value). According to the last census, the population in Bosnia and Herzegovina numbered around four million. If the reached level of development is measured by traditional economic indicators, which would, by the World Bank records, put the country in the group with higher middle income. The first complete scientific research on regional component in development of Bosnia and Herzegovina was the work by H. Hadžiomerović “Regional component in economic development of Bosnia and Herzegovina” from 1963/64. It points out that the regional component has its place and role in determining the optimal economic development of a whole, which is made by regions. The starting point of this research is the optimal economic development of a whole, the system that includes the regions. In interregional relations the emphasis is on the justification and the need to identify the areas of priority that offer the best territorial conditions for development, which means, using the current terminology, offers competition to the development. Based on balance or harmonisation of the development of priority or complementary zones according to the suggestions from 1963/64, it would be possible to generate a development competitive in the Yugoslav market. The proposed model offered elements for connecting the local, regional and republic level with the Yugoslav environment, in order to achieve a more “harmonised” development of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and maximise the economic and social effects. Bošnjović in 1969 and 1979 turns the attention of the policy creators and the scientific community to the correlation between regional and economic development. He opens the issue of priority: centre or periphery, region or the whole (Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, i.e. the state at the time). As the solution he proposes the polycentric system as the model of development. The regional development is clearly and unequivocally highlighted 6 as the phenomenon which could move towards integration, start the social and economic development of the regions, but also of the whole. The need to harmonise regional and global development is also emphasized. By the early 1980s the concept of regional development evolves from its notion and definition as simply one of the development factors, into a concept of regional development as the major factor of development, social and
Recommended publications
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Returnee Monitoring Study Minority Returnees to the Republika Srpska - Bosnia and Herzegovina UNHCR Sarajevo June 2000 This study was researched and written by Michelle Alfaro, with the much appreciated assistance and support of Snjezana Ausic, Zoran Beric, Ranka Bekan-Cihoric, Jadranko Bijelica, Sanja Kljajic, Renato Kunstek, Nefisa Medosevic, Svjetlana Pejdah, Natasa Sekularac, Maja Simic, and Alma Zukic, and especially Olivera Markovic. For their assistance with conducting interviews, we are grateful to BOSPO, a Tuzla NGO, and IPTF and OSCE in Prijedor Municipality. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION UNHCR conducted a Returnee Monitoring Framework (RMF) study in the Republika Srpska (RS) between 5 January and 3 March 2000. A total of 194 interviews were carried out, covering 30 villages or towns within 12 municipalities, with minority returnees to the RS who had either fully returned or were in the process of return. The purpose of the this study was to gauge the national protection afforded to minority returnees to the RS, the living conditions of returnees, as well as the positive and negative factors which affect the sustainability of return. For example, interviewees were asked questions about security, schools, pensions, health care, etc. Through the 194 interviews, UNHCR was able to obtain information on 681 persons. Broken down by ethnicity, there were 657 Bosniacs, 13 Bosnian Croats, and 11 Other which included Serbs in mixed marriages, people of mixed ethnicity and several people of other nationalities who had immigrated to BH before the conflict. 20% of the study group was over 60 years old (elderly), 54% was between the ages of 19-59, 20% was school age (7-18 years), and 6% was 0-6 years old.
  • Response of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to The

    Response of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to The

    CPT/Inf (2012) 16 Response of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina from 5 to 14 April 2011 The Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina has requested the publication of this response. The report of the CPT on its April 2011 visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina is set out in document CPT/Inf (2012) 15. Strasbourg, 26 April 2012 - 3 - CONTENTS Ministry of Justice - Pre-trial Detention Unit in the State-level Prison of Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................................6 Ministry of Security (Service for Aliens' Affairs)............................................................................7 District Prosecutor’s Office of the Republika Srpska - Special Prosecutor’s Office of Banja Luka .....................................................................................................................................9 Istočno Sarajevo District Prosecutor’s Office................................................................................12 Ministry of Justice of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina...............................................13 Ministry of the Interior of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.......................................16 Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina................18 Ministry of Justice of Republika Srspka
  • Species from the Middle Miocene Kupres Basin (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

    Species from the Middle Miocene Kupres Basin (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

    THE NAUTILUS 128(2):51–54, 2014 Page 51 A new melanopsid (Gastropoda) species from the middle Miocene Kupres Basin (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Thomas A. Neubauer1 Oleg Mandic Mathias Harzhauser Geological-Paleontological Department Natural History Museum Vienna 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT teleoconch microsculpture in one species, interpreted Melanopsis fateljensis as a reaction to the oversaturation of calcium carbonate (Caenogastropoda: Cerithiimorpha: in the water under the existing alkaline, hard-water con- Melanopsidae) is described as a new species from the early ditions(e.g.,Westetal.,1991). Middle Miocene lacustrine deposits of the Kupres Basin. Sim- ilarities to other co-occurring melanopsids are discussed. Its Shortly after, another taxonomic work on the ostracod unique morphology, in particular the elongate, stepped spire and gastropod fauna of the region around Kupres was with prominent spiral bulges, clearly distinguishes the new published by Krstic´ et al. (2013). This study dealing with species from all other Melanopsidae known from the Neogene an outcrop located about 2 km ENE of Fatelj Hill of Europe. revealed a different assemblage with species known from the Sinj, Drnisˇ, and Gacko basins (Figure 1) and none of Additional Keywords: Melanopsis, freshwater gastropod, new species, Dinaride Lake System, Langhian those described by Neubauer et al. (2013a). The fauna is characterized by few species of the genera Gyraulus, Fossarulus, Bania, and “Pseudamnicola” (both occurring species were recombined with Bania by Neubauer et al., 2013a). Such a faunal composition with pulmonate and INTRODUCTION typical pioneer species corresponds to those found in the Gacko and Sinj basins and points to rather stressed, Recently, Neubauer et al.
  • Alternative Report HRC Bosnia

    Alternative Report HRC Bosnia

    Written Information for the Consideration of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Second Periodic Report by the Human Rights Committee (CCPR/C/BIH/2) SEPTEMBER 2012 Submitted by TRIAL (Swiss Association against Impunity) Association of the Concentration Camp-Detainees Bosnia and Herzegovina Association of Detained – Association of Camp-Detainees of Brčko District Bosnia and Herzegovina Association of Families of Killed and Missing Defenders of the Homeland War from Bugojno Municipality Association of Relatives of Missing Persons from Ilijaš Municipality Association of Relatives of Missing Persons from Kalinovik (“Istina-Kalinovik ‘92”) Association of Relatives of Missing Persons of the Sarajevo-Romanija Region Association of Relatives of Missing Persons of the Vogošća Municipality Association Women from Prijedor – Izvor Association of Women-Victims of War Croatian Association of War Prisoners of the Homeland War in Canton of Central Bosnia Croatian Association of Camp-Detainees from the Homeland War in Vareš Prijedor 92 Regional Association of Concentration Camp-Detainees Višegrad Sumejja Gerc Union of Concentration Camp-Detainees of Sarajevo-Romanija Region Vive Žene Tuzla Women’s Section of the Association of Concentration Camp Torture Survivors Canton Sarajevo TRIAL P.O. Box 5116 CH-1211 Geneva 11 Tél/Fax: +41 22 3216110 [email protected] www.trial-ch.org CCP: 17-162954-3 CONTENTS Contents Paragraphs Background 1. Right to Life and Prohibition of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Remedies and Administration of Justice (Arts. 6,
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
  • Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M

    Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M

    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 30 Article 10 Issue 3 Symposium 1997 Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M. Cousens Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cousens, Elizabeth M. (1997) "Making Peace in Bosnia Work," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 30: Iss. 3, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol30/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M. Cousens* This symposium asks "what makes peace agreements work" and specifically directs us to explore the degree to which and how "quasi- sovereigns" determine the answer. At a minimum, a peace agreement could be said to "work" when formerly warring parties honor their commitments more than they renege, and when a broader constituency develops within post-war society to support that agreement's basic provisions. Along both dimensions, the peace agreement providing the framework for politics in Bosnia today works haltingly at best.' The explanation for its inadequacies has very little to do with quasi-sovereignty, however. Rather, it has a great deal to do with the decisions and actions of the all-too-sovereign national governments and major international agencies that enjoy a disproportionate influence over the implementation of the peace agreement's key provisions.
  • European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And

    European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And

    16/06/2021 RAP/RCha/BIH/11 (2021) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 11th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Articles 11, 12, 13, 14 and 23 of the European Social Charter for the period 01/01/2016 – 31/12/2019 Report registered by the Secretariat on 16 June 2021 CYCLE 2021 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND REFUGEES THE ELEVENTH REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER /REVISED/ GROUP I: HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ARTICLES 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 23 REFERENCE PERIOD: JANUARY 2016 - DECEMBER 2019 SARAJEVO, SEPTEMBER 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 3 II. ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ........... 4 III. GENERAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 5 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................................... 5 2. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................... 5 3. Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................. 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF RATIFIED ESC/R/ PROVISIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ..............................................................................................
  • Role of Microfinance in the Household Reconstruction Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Role of Microfinance in the Household Reconstruction Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    MFC Spotlight Note #6 Role of Microfinance in the Household Reconstruction Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina Michal Matul and Caroline Tsilikounas1 January 2004 INTRODUCTION This note presents summary of findings from the study conducted within Imp-Act project2 on the role of micro-enterprise lending in the household reconstruction process during 1996-2002 in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)3. This research is one of the first of its kind to examine the impact of minimalist micro- enterprise credit on reconstruction. Additionally, because microfinance is still a young and fast learning industry, this study is meant to help engage in a debate about impact of microfinance on reconstruction. It can also contribute to putting forward some propositions to be tested in other post-conflict settings in order to widen the pool of microfinance recipients, and consequently the impact of microfinance on household reconstruction. Many organisations have introduced microfinance as part of their larger portfolio of programming activities aimed at reconstruction and revitalisation of war-torn communities in BiH. The level of international support providing political stability and basic economic security has been high as compared to the African post-war experience4. This in turn has aided the climate for sound microfinance programming and has provided a stable back-drop for their development and growth5. Given that microfinance in the specific environment of BiH during the reconstruction period (1996-2002) was limited to the provision of micro- enterprise credit, the goal of this research is to understand the role played by micro-enterprise credit in household reconstruction. An analysis of multiplier effects and impacts of microfinance at the macro-level goes much beyond the scope of this research.
  • Minutes of the Meeting Local Project Appraisal

    Minutes of the Meeting Local Project Appraisal

    mm mm Emp<JWf!ff!d lives. Resilient nations. MINUTES OF THE MEETING LOCAL PROJECT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE Project: Increasing resilience of Livno, Mrkonjić Grad and Maglaj Project ID: BHl0/00110813 Summary of the meeting Introduction Mr. Avdić, UNDP BiH Sector Leader for Energy and Environment initiated the meeting by informing all participants of the Local Programme Advisory Committee (LPAC) that Project "Increasing resilience of Livno, Mrkonjić Grad and Maglaj" received Endorsement of the Czech Government. Expected start of the Project is 15 August 2018. Mr. Avdic stressed out that presenting the project activities, methodology and implementation modalities to LPAC, is a formal precondition and underlined the importance of local partners role within this project. Presentation of the Project Document Project budget is EUR 100,000 and anticipated duration is 12 months starting from 15 August 2018 and ending on 14 August 2019. The project would use the Direct Implementation Modality (DIM). The Project Board will be comprised of the following institutions: Ministry of Security of BiH, Civil Protection Directorate/Administration of FBIH, Civil Protection Directorate/Administration of RS, the Czech Republic Humanitarian Aid and UNDP. Project would lean and build on vast and successful UNDP ORR efforts in the local communities. In particular, the project will be closely interlinked with all relevant on-going and planned ORR related projects to secure alignment of results, efficiency, avoid duplication of efforts and ensure contribution to overall strategic direction. Overall objective of the project is to strengthen disaster risk reduction (ORR) capacities at all government levels in BiH and citizens, with focus on vulnerable categories.
  • Health Care Systems in Bih Financing Challenges and Reform Options?

    Health Care Systems in Bih Financing Challenges and Reform Options?

    ANALYSIS Sarajevo Health Care Systems in BiH Financing challenges and reform options? Marko Martić and ognjen Đukić, SarajeVo October 2017 High expectations and increasing needs of citizens have influenced a relatively high share of private expenditure in total health expenditure (28% in 2014) which is double the EU average (14%). In 2014, the private household health care spending of a family with three members averaged 50 KM monthly, which may pose a serious burden for the families living below or near poverty line. It indicates a certain degree of inequality in access to health care services among the citizens of BiH. There is a high level of inequality of public expenditure in health sector among the cantons by insured person in FBiH (from 453 KM to 875 KM), given that revenues from the employees’ contributions “return” to the canton they were collected in It can be said that the principle of solidarity does not extend beyond the cantonal level in this way. In order to achieve a higher level of equality in the public resources for health sector among the cantons, it is necessary for the cantons or the Government of FBiH to find other resources to make it possible. High dependence of this system on the contributions from the employed is not an optimal solution for BiH taking into account a low employment rate and population aging process. Among the EU countries applying mainly the Bismarck’s model, a trend of movement towards the so-called “mixed model” can be noticed – model involving greater participation of other sources of financing, in addition to the wage-based con- tributions.
  • Komponenta: Zapošljavanje Kod Poslodavaca PREGLED

    Komponenta: Zapošljavanje Kod Poslodavaca PREGLED

    Komponenta: Zapošljavanje kod poslodavaca PREGLED POSLODAVACA KOJIMA SU ODOBRENA SREDSTVA PO PROGRAMU ZAPOŠLJAVANJA I SAMOZAPOŠLJAVANJA CILJNIH KATEGORIJA U PRIVREDI U 2021.GODINI NA SJEDNICI UPRAVNOG ODBORA OD 21.05.2021.GODINA ODOBRENO Rb. Biro Filijala Naziv pravnog lica LICA 1 Biro Han Pijesak Istocno Sarajevo "RSC PROMET" d.o.o. 1 2 Biro Zvornik Zvornik Gostionica ''SAČ'' Marica Đokić s.p. Zvornik 1 3 Biro Zvornik Zvornik "SIGMA" Darko Božić s.p. Trnovica 1 4 Biro Modriča Doboj Zanatska radnja "DDD" Boro Đuran s.p. Kužnjača 1 5 Biro Modriča Doboj ''MAVEGO'' Marina Đuran, s.p. Modriča 1 6 Biro Šipovo Banja Luka Mesnica ,,Vitorog,,Milanka Pastir,s.p.Šipovo 1 7 Biro Šipovo Banja Luka ,,MB. MILMAX,, DOO 1 8 Biro Sokolac Istocno Sarajevo "Štamparija" Mile Šuka s.p. Sokolac 1 Zanatska radnja "TOPLOMONT" Mladen Trivić s.p. 9 Biro Čelinac Banja Luka 1 Crni Vrh 10 Biro I. N. Sarajevo Istocno Sarajevo D.O.O. "MAHAGONI" Istočno Novo Sarajevo 2 11 Biro Banja Luka Banja Luka ,,GEO-PLAN'' - FADžAN SALIH s.p. 2 12 Biro Banja Luka Banja Luka "GMP KOMPANI" d.o.o. Banja Luka 1 13 Biro Vlasenica Zvornik JKP "Vlasenica" d.o.o. Vlasenica 15 Zanatsko trgovinska radnja "JASEN" Zdenko Sekulović 14 Biro Foča Trebinje 2 s.p. Foča 15 Biro Foča Trebinje Trgovinska radnja "Agro-trade" Dejan Kapuran s.p. Foča 1 Ugostiteljska radnja "KELT PUB" Žarko Perišić s.p. 16 Biro Foča Trebinje 1 Foča 17 Biro Foča Trebinje Konoba "Zlatna dunja-M" Ljilja Vasović s.p. Foča 2 18 Biro Foča Trebinje "FALCON" d.o.o.
  • Tara-Drina National Park

    Tara-Drina National Park

    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.