Komponenta: Zapošljavanje Kod Poslodavaca PREGLED
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Urban Agriculture in Bosnia: Case of Sarajevo Region
Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2013, 14(4), p.1585-1597 DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/14.4.1401 URBAN AGRICULTURE IN BOSNIA: CASE OF SARAJEVO REGION Hamid EL BILALI1, Sinisa BERJAN2*, Jasmina SIMIC3, Aleksandra DESPOTOVIC4, Sabrija CADRO5 and Mirko KULINA2 1Department of Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development; Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM-MAIB); via Ceglie 9, Valenzano 70010, Bari, Italy 2Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo; Vuka Karadzica 30, East Sarajevo 71123, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Tel: + 387 57 342 701; Fax: + 387 57 340 401; E-mail: [email protected], “*correspondence”. 3Agricultural Institute of the Republic of Srpska; Knjaza Miloša 17, 78 000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 4Department for Agro-Economy and Rural Development, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Podgorica; Mihaila Lalića 1, Podgorica 81000, Montenegro 5Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Sarajevo; Zmaja od Bosne 8, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina ABSTRACT About 39% of the Bosnian population is urban. The main objective of this work is to get an insight into urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) in Bosnia with a focus on legal and regulatory framework, governance, and advisory services’ role. Information were collected by a literature review and semi-structured interviews of 30 urban gardeners as well as extension agents and municipal officers in Sarajevo region. The paper analyses references to UPA in the main agricultural development policies in Bosnia; assesses focus on UPA by extension agents; and analyses urban planning and zoning regulations and budget dedicated to agriculture in many municipalities of Sarajevo region. Semi-structured interviews focused also on economic, environmental, aesthetical and social benefits of UPA. -
Bosnia and Herzegovina
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA S A R A J E V O SPECIAL DEPARTMENT FOR WAR CRIMES Number: KT-RZ-137/05 Sarajevo, 16 November 2009 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA -Trial Panel- Ref. No: X-KR-05/122 Pursuant to Article 35(2)i) and Article 226(1) and Article 275 of the Criminal Procedure Code of BiH, I hereby file the following A M E N D E D I N D I C T M E N T AGAINST: PREDRAG BASTAH, a.k.a. “Dragan”, son of Radovan and Danica (maiden name Samardžić), born in Podkozlovača, Han Pijesak Municipality, on 18 October 1953, residing in Vlasenica at 21 Vojvode Mišića St., Citizen Identification Number 1810953171428, Serb, citizen of the Republic of Serbia and of BiH, literate, secondary school qualification, married, father of one child of age, indigent, served the army in Belgrade 1972/1973, no previous criminal record, currently held in custody under the Decision of the Court of BiH number X- KR-05/122 dated 28 February 2008. GORAN VIŠKOVIĆ, a.k.a. “Vjetar”, son of Stojan and Milica (maiden name Drakulić), born in Buljevići, Vlasenica Municipality, on 25 November 1954, residing in Šekovići at Jakovice bb/no number/, Citizen Identification Number 2511954183744, Serb, citizen of the RS and BiH, literate, secondary school qualifications, married, father of one underage and three children of age, indigent, served the army in Kraljevo and Niš 1973/1974, convicted by a Judgment of the Basic Court of Vlasenica number 092-0-K-07-000 001 dated 2 July 2007 for the criminal offense referred to in Article 155(1) of the RS CC and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of three (3) months (suspended sentence of 1 one year), the Accused has been imposed the prohibitive measures under the most recent Decision X-KR-05/122 dated 10 July 2009. -
Tara-Drina National Park
Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged. -
Flood Situation & Intl. Assistance
21 May 2014: Bosnia and Herzegovina – Flood situation & intl. assistance SITUATION International CROATIA Assistance • As of 20 May, according to the UN Countries Office of the Resident Coordinator, the most severely Austria AT affected areas in Bosnia and Herzegovina are Samac, Odzak, Belgium BE Orasje, Doboj, Bijeljina, Brcko Bulgaria BG and Maglaj. • ECHO reports indicate that the Croatia HR situation remains complex, due to Czech Republic CZ numerous landslides that caused damage to houses and roads. Germany DE Furthermore, a number of cities France FR and villages in the flooded areas fYRoM have neither electricity nor running water. Hungary HU • According to the Luxembourg LU Hydrometeorological Institutes of the country, on 21 May in the Latvia LV afternoon, water levels on all B O S N I A Lithuania LT rivers are declining. Weather is Estonia EE a n d improving and no heavy rainfall is Montenegro ME expected in the next 48h. HERZEGOVINA CROATIA Norway NO • The on-site Union Civil Protection Team continues assessing the Poland PL situation and assisting the Romania RO country’s authorities with the coordination of the incoming Slovenia SI international assistance. Slovakia SK Sources: ECHO, UN, National Turkey TR Hydrometeorological Institutes United Kingdom GB abc Location of intl. assistance SERBIA Affected Areas (regions/cantons) Status of Emergency declared Main roads MONTENEGRO Main rivers Floodwaters detected by MODIS, over 19-20 May. Floodwaters detected by Copernicus Emergency Management Service (Observations available only -
![Utorak, 06.09.2011. 1 [Otvorena Sednica] 2 [Svedok Je Ušao U Sudnicu]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/4714/utorak-06-09-2011-1-otvorena-sednica-2-svedok-je-u%C5%A1ao-u-sudnicu-524714.webp)
Utorak, 06.09.2011. 1 [Otvorena Sednica] 2 [Svedok Je Ušao U Sudnicu]
Svedok: Armin Baždar (nastavak) (otvorena sednica) Strana 18405 Unakrsno ispituje g. Karadži ć (nastavak) 1 utorak, 06.09.2011. 2 [Otvorena sednica] 3 [Svedok je ušao u sudnicu] 4 [Optuženi je ušao u sudnicu] 5 ... Po četak u 09.02h 6 SUDSKI SLUŽBENIK: [simultani prevod] Molimo ustanite. 7 Me ñunarodni krivi čni sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju otvara zasedanje. 8 Možete sesti. 9 SUDIJA KWON: [simultani prevod] Dobro jutro svima. 10 Dobro jutro, gospodine Baždar. 11 SVEDOK: Dobro jutro. 12 SUDIJA KWON: [simultani prevod] Izvolite, gospodine Karadži ću. 13 OPTUŽENI: Hvala, ekselencijo. Dobro jutro, ekselencije. Dobro jutro 14 svima. 15 SVEDOK: ARMIN BAŽDAR [nastavak] 16 Unakrsno ispituje g. Karadži ć: [nastavak] 17 P: Dobro jutro, gospodine Baždar. 18 O: Dobro jutro. 19 SUDIJA KWON: [simultani prevod] Gospodine Baždar, zamoli ćemo Vas da se 20 malo približite mikrofonu ili da govorite malo glasnije radi prevodilaca. Hvala. 21 SVEDOK: U redu. 22 G. KARADŽI Ć: 23 P: Ju če ste nešto rekli o kapama, što nisam bio sasvim razumeo, a onda 24 sam posle video i u Vašoj izjavi da Vi pominjete... ju če ste rekli nešto... "te 25 vaše ulojene kape". Na šta ste mislili, na koje kape? Pominjete u izjavi šubare. 26 Jeste mislili na šubare? 27 28 29 30 utorak, 06.09.2011. Predmet br. IT-95-5/18-T Ovaj transkript je izra ñen na osnovu zvani čnog zvu čnog zapisa na jeziku regiona na činjenog tokom sudskog postupka, poštuju ći verbatim pravilo (doslovan zapis, od rije či do rije či). Kako su na su ñenju korišteni bosanski, hrvatski i srpski jezik (B/H/S), ovisno o originalnom govorniku odnosno prevodiocu, tako su sva tri jezika zastupljena i u transkriptu. -
IFOR: Mission Accomplished S •• SFOR: Mission Goes on F Ner
I F 0 R Published in the interest of the Implementation Forces Wednesday, December 18, 1996 Vol. I, N0 23 INSIDE 'Almeria' Brigade arrives ... Page 3 /FOR Soldiers fi·om Norway, United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Uhraine, France, Portugal, Turleey, Rom.ania, .Italy, Sweden, Belgium, Spain and a Swiss OSCE membe1; join together to give the thumbs up to the success/iLl end of /FOR's mission on be hall of their countries and all the other contributing nations. Photo: CPIC, Sarajevo Superman fights mines P{/ge 5 IFOR: mission accomplished s •• SFOR: mission goes on F ner. " Most significantly, he Less than 90 days from D was able to refer to the skills elay, Lt. Gen. Sir Michael 0 of the first IFOR troops as Walker, Commander of the "making the nearly impossi ACE Rapid Reaction Corps, R ble seem routine." speaking as commander of These statements were IFOR Land Forces, was able made against a backdrop of to comment upon his forces' David Taylor daily, world-wide media cov success as they prepared for erage that showed the first the final days of implement brave men and women of Getting l\1ostar airport NATO-led, multi-national ing what would become the Europe, the U.S., and around ready l'm:e 7 ednesday, Feb. 14, deployment - almost 60,000 Inter Entity Boundary Line the world, are striving to 1996 - Barely two troops from more than 30 (IEBL) and ensuring that make every moment of their Wmonths after h._. contributing nations Faction troops continued time here count for some signing of the Dayton Peat L 1 ollm~ powerfully and withdrawal to their bar thing; to leave a legacy. -
Bosnia and Herzegovina
FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre -
STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the -
Trans-European North-South Motorway (Tem)
TRANS-EUROPEAN NORTH-SOUTH MOTORWAY (TEM) 4-7 June 2017, Dubrovnik, Croatia PUBLIC COMPANY “REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA MOTORWAYS” Ltd. • MANAGEMENT , CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF EXPRESSWAYS AND MOTORWAYS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA ARE CARRIED OUT BY PUBLIC COMPANY “REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA MOTORWAYS” ltd The motorway network in RS includes following directions (alignments): 1. Banja Luka – Gradiška L= 35 km 2. Mahovljani interchange 3. Banja Luka – Prnjavor, L=35,30 km 4. Prnjavor – Doboj, L =36,6 km 5. Glamočani – Mliništa, L = 92 km 5. Doboj – Vukosavlje, L = 46,6 km 6. Banja Luka – Prijedor– Novi Grad, L = 71 km 7. Vukosavlje – Bijeljina, L = 62 km APART FROM CONSTRUCTION OF MOTORWAY SECTIONS, STRATEGIC PLANS INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF FOLLOWING EXPRESSWAYS IN TOTAL LENGHT OF 468 KM: • Lukavica– Pale – Sokolac – Rogatica- Višegrad (128) км • Bijeljina – Zvornik– Sokolac (145 km) • Sokolac – Rogatica – Foča – Gacko – Bileća – Trebinje (160 km) • Prijedor– Kozarska Dubica– Donja Gradina (50 km) • Banja Luka – Čelinac– Kotor Varoš– Obodnik (50 km ) • Stolac– Ljubinje– Trebinje– granica sa Crnom Gorom (95 км) Previous, Current and future Activities EBRD/EIB EBRD/EC EBRD EIB Vc through RS, L=46,6 km Preparatory activities Asset management, routine maintenance, structural maintenance, operations? • Asset management is the strategic business process approach to managing the long-term maintenance of roads • Routine maintenance - All works and services which are believed to be necessary to achieve the best possible results with regard to the availability, reliability and sustainability of the Highway. These services are essential to ensure the safety of the road users and for the proper management and communication of all incidents as well as of all planned maintenance works and to ascertain that the condition and status of the Highway is maintained. -
Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)
E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27 -
Social Cohesion
Social Cohesion Social cohesion is a societal challenge that requires a Since 2013, the Mission has The main focus of the CaHs is strategic approach and the engagement of numerous supported the establishment to react to and condemn hate and activities of 31 Coalitions and bias incidents, and initiate stakeholders. Improved community cohesion achieved against Hate (CaHs) across social cohesion actions within via the sustained engagement of civil society actors Bosnia and Herzegovina, local communities. and public authorities in the implementation of bringing together over 300 civil locally-designed Community Cohesion Action Plans society organizations (CSOs) (CCAPs), is a central element of the OSCE Mission and individuals into informal yet influential groups. to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s engagement in this field. To facilitate this, the Mission local and intercommunity social is dedicated to building co- cohesion activities, and the operation and co-ordination prevention of bias and hate between stakeholders, playing related crimes and incidents. its role in the sustainability of As of 2020, the Mission continues to provide support to 20 CaHs in Bratunac, Brčko, Čapljina, Doboj, Foča, Gornji Vakuf - Uskoplje, Gradačac, Jajce, Konjic, Livno, Mostar, Nevesinje, Prijedor, Sanski Most, Teočak, Trebinje, Tuzla, Višegrad, Zenica and Zvornik. Furthermore, local officials are committed to hate and bias prevention by introducing official municipal protocols for the condemnation of such incidents. The focus of Mission’s work is on increasing the perseverance of civil society members to augment the impact of these interventions through their active participation in the design and implementation of local policies. At the same time, the Mission seeks commitment from public officials to continuously include civil society in addressing strategic and daily challenges in the respective communities. -
Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide and Demographic Changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies Year 2, Issue 2, June 2019, pp. 57-81. Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide and Demographic Changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina Muhidin Mulalic Abstract: Different cultures, religions and traditions and hence multiculturalism represented in demographic diversity was strongly engraved in Bosnian cities, towns and villages. Different groups of people in Bosnia and Herzegovina shared diverse demographic space that ensured continuation of peace, equal opportunities, mutual tolerance, civil rights and multiethnic coexistence. This paper aims to articulate historical developments of Bosnian demographic diversity by especially taking into consideration the multicultural model and the developments during the 1990s. Then, it is significant to analyze the ethnic cleansing and genocide and how they have changed the demographic structure of the country, especially with regards to the existence of multiethnic cities, towns and villages. This paper explores ethnic cleansing and genocide as tools within the context of demographic changes, especially in the Serb controlled territories. How the ethnic cleansing and genocide were organized and carried out? What are the root-causes of ethnic cleansing and genocide that were deeply rooted in radical nationalist ideologies and projects? Why radical ethno-cultural national ideology was systematically used for cleansing the territories from the “other” “alien” ethnicities, nations and people? In-depth analysis of the demographic changes as a result of ethnic cleansing and genocide will be based on Bosnian population censuses of 1991 and of 2013. A comparative analysis will clearly demonstrate to what extent ethnic cleansing and genocide affected centuries old demographic diversity of Bosnian cities, towns and villages. Keywords: Demography; Ethnic Cleansing; Genocide; Multiculturalism; Migrations Assoc.