DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Myanmar PERSUAP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Myanmar PERSUAP BUREAUS FOR ASIA AND FOOD SECURITY PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) IEE AMENDMENT: §216.3(B) PESTICIDE PROCEDURES PROJECT/ACTIVITY DATA Project/Activity Name: Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II (“Harvest II”) Amendment #: 1 Geographic Location: South East Asia (Cambodia) Implementation Start/End: 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2021 Implementing Partner(s): Abt Associates, International Development Enterprises (iDE), Emerging Markets Consulting (EMC) Tracking ID/link: Tracking ID/link of Related IEE: Asia 16-042 https://ecd.usaid.gov/repository/pdf/46486.pdf Tracking ID/link of Other Related Analyses: ORGANIZATIONAL/ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Implementing Operating Unit: Cambodia Funding Operating Unit: Bureau for Asia Initial Funding Account(s): $17.5 M Total Funding Amount: Amendment Funding Date / Amount: April 2017-April 2022 Other Affected Units: Bureau for Food Security Lead BEO Bureau: Asia Prepared by: Alan Schroeder, PhD, MBA; Kim Hian Seng, PhD, with support from Abt Associates and iDE Date Prepared: 8/2/2018 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW DATA Analysis Type: §216.3(B) Pesticide Procedures - PERSUAP Environmental Determination: Negative Determination with Conditions PERSUAP Procedures Expiration Date: 12/31/2021 Climate Risks Considerations / Conditions 2018 Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II PERSUAP 1 ACRONYMS AI Active Ingredient A/COR Agreement/Contracting Officer’s Representative ASIA Bureau for Asia BEO Bureau Environmental Officer BMP Best Management Practice BRC British Retail Consortium BT Bacillus thuringiensis CABI Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau International CFR Code of Federal Regulations DAALI Department of Agronomy and Agricultural Land Improvement DPPSP Department of Plant Protection, Sanitary and Phytosanitary EA Environmental Assessment EC50 Effective Concentration 50 EHS Environmental, Health and Safety EMMP Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan EPA US Environmental Protection Agency EPC Empty Pesticide Container EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FFS Farmer Field Schools FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act FRAC Fungicide Resistance Action Committee FTF Feed the Future GAP Good Agriculture Practice GDA General Directorate of Agriculture GlobalGAP Global Good Agriculture Practices GOC Royal Government of Cambodia GUP General Use Pesticide ha Hectare HARVEST Helping Address Rural Vulnerabilities and Ecosystem Stability HDPE High Density Polyethylene HRAC Herbicide Resistance Action Committee HT Highly Toxic iDE International development Enterprises IEE Initial Environmental Examination IGR Insect Growth Regulator IP Implementing Partner IPM Integrated Pest Management IRAC Insecticide Resistance Action Committee kg Kilograms km Kilometers 2018 Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II PERSUAP 2 LC50 Lethal Concentration 50 LD50 Lethal Dose 50 LOP Length of Project m Meters masl Meters above sea level MEO Mission Environmental Officer MAFF Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries MRL Maximum Residue Level/Limit MT Moderately Toxic NGO Non-Governmental Organization PAN Pesticide Action Network PER Pesticide Evaluation Report PERSUAP Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use Action Plan PGR Plant Growth Regulator pH log of hydrogen concentration, measure of acidity PHI Pre-Harvest Interval PIC Prior Informed Consent POP Persistent Organic Pollutants PMP Pest Management Plan PPE Personal Protection Equipment RD Reproductive & Developmental toxin REI Re-Entry Interval RUP Restricted Use Pesticide S&C Standards and Certification SDS Safety Data Sheet SPS Sanitary and Phytosanitary SPU Safe Pesticide Use SS Scoping Statement SUAP Safe Use Action Plan UC University of California UN United Nations US United States USAID US Agency for International Development USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency WHO World Health Organization 2018 Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II PERSUAP 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 PERSUAP SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 1: CROP / PEST INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 25 Harvest II Crops Agronomic Information ...................................................................................................... 26 Pesticide Information ..................................................................................................................................... 30 Pesticides Recommended in This Harvest II PERSUAP ............................................................................... 30 PERSUAP-Approved Fungicides and Bactericides ............................................................................ 30 PERSUAP-Approved Herbicides and Plant Growth Regulators .......................................................... 34 PERSUAP-Approved Insecticides and Miticides ............................................................................... 36 Integrated Pest Management .......................................................................................................................... 41 Pesticide Information ..................................................................................................................................... 43 SECTION 2: CAMBODIA PESTICIDE STUDY METHODOLOGY AND FINDINGS ................................ 45 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 45 Findings .......................................................................................................................................................... 45 SECTION 3: PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT ....................................................................................... 48 3.1 Factor A: USEPA Registration Status of the Proposed Pesticides ........................................................... 48 3.2 Factor B: Basis for Selection of Pesticides .............................................................................................. 49 3.3 Factor C: Extent to Which the Proposed Pesticide Use Is, or Could Be, Part of an IPM Program .......... 50 3.4 Factor D: Proposed Method or Methods of Application, Including the Availability of Application and Safety Equipment ...................................................................................................................................... 51 3.5 Factor E: Any Acute and Long-Term Toxicological Hazards, Either Human or Environmental, Associated with the Proposed Use, and Measures Available to Minimize Such Hazards ........................ 51 3.6 Factor F: Effectiveness of the Requested Pesticide for the Proposed Use ............................................... 52 3.7 Factor G: Compatibility of the Proposed Pesticide Use with Target and Non-Target Ecosystems ......... 53 3.8 Factor H: Conditions Under Which the Pesticide Is to Be Used, Inlcuding Climate, Geography, Hydrology, and Soils ................................................................................................................................ 54 3.9 Factor I: Availability of Other Pesticides or Non-Chemical Control Methods ........................................ 58 3.10 Factor J: Host Country’s Ability to Regulate or Control the Use, Distribution, Storage, and Disposal of the Requested Pesticide ............................................................................................................................ 59 3.11 Factor K: Provision for Training of Users and Applicators ................................................................... 60 3.12 Factor L: Provision Made for Monitoring the Use and Effectiveness of Each Pesticide ....................... 61 SECTION 4: SAFER USE ACTION PLAN TEMPLATE AS RECOMMENDED BY BFS BEO .................. 61 ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................................................... 64 Annex 1: Harvest II Crops, Pests, Diseases, Weeds GAP and IPM Plan Information................................... 64 Cambodia Asparagus IPM Tools and Tactics .................................................................................... 64 Cambodia Black Pepper IPM Tools and Tactics ................................................................................ 66 Cambodia Brassicaceous Crops IPM Tools and Tactics ..................................................................... 68 2018 Feed the Future Cambodia Harvest II PERSUAP 4 Cambodia Cashew Crop IPM Tools and Tactics ................................................................................ 74 Cambodia Citrus IPM Tools and Tactics........................................................................................... 77 Cambodia Cucurbitaceous Crops IPM Tools and Tactics ................................................................... 82 Cambodia Ginger and Turmeric IPM Tools and Tactics ..................................................................... 88 Cambodia Guava and Jujube IPM Tools and Tactics ......................................................................... 90 Cambodia Lady Finger Banana Crop IPM Tools and Tactics ............................................................. 92 Cambodia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paracoccus Marginatus and Ferrisia Virgata
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020. 30(7): 1013–1017 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2001.01016 Endomicrobial Community Profiles of Two Different Mealybugs: Paracoccus marginatus and Ferrisia virgata Polpass Arul Jose1#, Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy1, Pandiyan Indira Gandhi2, Murugaiyan Senthilkumar3, Veeranan Janahiraman1, Karunandham Kumutha1, Aritra Roy Choudhury4, Sandipan Samaddar4‡, Rangasamy Anandham1*, and Tongmin Sa4* 1Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India 2Regional Research Station, Vridhachalam, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India 3Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India 4Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Pseudococcidae) harbor diverse microbial symbionts that play essential roles in host physiology, ecology, and evolution. In this study we aimed to reveal microbial communities associated with two different mealybugs, papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) and two-tailed mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) collected from the same host plant. Comparative analysis of microbial communities associated with these mealybugs revealed differences that appear to stem from phylogenetic associations and different nutritional Received: January 13, 2020 requirements. This first report on both bacterial and fungal communities associated with these
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Report Title Here
    Vegetable biosecurity & quarantine gap analysis Prue McMichael Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd Project Number: VG07087 VG07087 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the vegetable industry. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 1849 X Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2008 FINAL REPORT Vegetable Biosecurity and Quarantine Gap Analysis VG07087 Prepared for : Horticulture Australia Ltd HAL Project No. VG07087 Prepared by : Prue McMichael Completion Date : September 2008 SCHOLEFIELD ROBINSON HORTICULTURAL SERVICES PTY LTD 118A Glen Osmond Road, Parkside SA 5063 Australia ACN 008 199 737 PO Box 650, Fullarton SA 5063 Ph: (08) 8373 2488 ABN 63 008 199 737 Fax: (08) 8373 2442 Email: [email protected] Web Site: www.srhs.com.au Offices in Adelaide and Mildura Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd HAL Project No. VG 07087 PROJECT LEADER Dr Prue McMichael Senior Consultant/Plant Pathologist Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd PO Box 650 Fullarton SA 5063 PURPOSE OF REPORT This Final Report has been prepared to document information acquired, analysed and considered during the review undertaken for HAL, into all aspects of the biosecurity of Australia’s vegetable industries that are members of AUSVEG.
    [Show full text]
  • Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer
    MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1995 Assessment UNEP 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1995 Assessment Montreal Protocol On Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer UNEP 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1995 Assessment The text of this report is composed in Times Roman. Co-ordination: Jonathan Banks (Chair MBTOC) Composition and layout: Michelle Horan Reprinting: UNEP Nairobi, Ozone Secretariat Date: 30 November 1994 No copyright involved. Printed in Kenya; 1994. ISBN 92-807-1448-1 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee for the 1995 Assessment of the MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER pursuant to Article 6 of the Montreal Protocol; Decision IV/13 (1993) by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol Disclaimer The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Technology and Economics Assessment Panel co-chairs and members, the Technical and Economics Options Committees chairs and members and the companies and organisations that employ them do not endorse the performance, worker safety, or environmental acceptability of any of the technical options discussed. Every industrial operation requires consideration of worker safety and proper disposal of contaminants and waste products. Moreover, as work continues - including additional toxicity testing and evaluation - more information on health, environmental and safety effects of alternatives and replacements
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths
    Chapter 8 Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths J. Joe Hull and Adrien Fónagy Abstract Sexual communication among the vast majority of moths typically involves the synthesis and release of species-specifc, multicomponent blends of sex pheromones (types of insect semiochemicals) by females. These compounds are then interpreted by conspecifc males as olfactory cues regarding female reproduc- tive readiness and assist in pinpointing the spatial location of emitting females. Studies by multiple groups using different model systems have shown that most sex pheromones are synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA by functionally specialized cells that comprise the pheromone gland. Although signifcant progress was made in identifying pheromone components and elucidating their biosynthetic pathways, it wasn’t until the advent of modern molecular approaches and the increased avail- ability of genetic resources that a more complete understanding of the molecular basis underlying pheromonogenesis was developed. Pheromonogenesis is regulated by a neuropeptide termed Pheromone Biosynthesis Activating Neuropeptide (PBAN) that acts on a G protein-coupled receptor expressed at the surface of phero- mone gland cells. Activation of the PBAN receptor (PBANR) triggers a signal trans- duction cascade that utilizes an infux of extracellular Ca2+ to drive the concerted action of multiple enzymatic steps (i.e. chain-shortening, desaturation, and fatty acyl reduction) that generate the multicomponent pheromone blends specifc to each species. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of moth sex pheromones before expanding on the molecular mechanisms regulating pheromonogenesis, and con- clude by highlighting recent developments in the literature that disrupt/exploit this critical pathway. J. J. Hull (*) USDA-ARS, US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA e-mail: [email protected] A.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Influences on Arthropod Community
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL INFLUENCES ON ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES COMPOSITION ON METROSIDEROS POLYMORPHA IN THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGy) AUGUST 2004 By Daniel S. Gruner Dissertation Committee: Andrew D. Taylor, Chairperson John J. Ewel David Foote Leonard H. Freed Robert A. Kinzie Daniel Blaine © Copyright 2004 by Daniel Stephen Gruner All Rights Reserved. 111 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to all the Hawaiian arthropods who gave their lives for the advancement ofscience and conservation. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Fellowship support was provided through the Science to Achieve Results program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and training grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the National Science Foundation (DGE-9355055 & DUE-9979656) to the Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology (EECB) Program of the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. I was also supported by research assistantships through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (A.D. Taylor) and the Water Resources Research Center (RA. Kay). I am grateful for scholarships from the Watson T. Yoshimoto Foundation and the ARCS Foundation, and research grants from the EECB Program, Sigma Xi, the Hawai'i Audubon Society, the David and Lucille Packard Foundation (through the Secretariat for Conservation Biology), and the NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant program (DEB-0073055). The Environmental Leadership Program provided important training, funds, and community, and I am fortunate to be involved with this network.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies
    INSECTICIDES - DEVELOPMENT OF SAFER AND MORE EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Edited by Stanislav Trdan Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/3356 Edited by Stanislav Trdan Contributors Mahdi Banaee, Philip Koehler, Alexa Alexander, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Juliana Cristina Dos Santos, Ronald Zanetti Bonetti Filho, Denilson Ferrreira De Oliveira, Giovanna Gajo, Dejane Santos Alves, Stuart Reitz, Yulin Gao, Zhongren Lei, Christopher Fettig, Donald Grosman, A. Steven Munson, Nabil El-Wakeil, Nawal Gaafar, Ahmed Ahmed Sallam, Christa Volkmar, Elias Papadopoulos, Mauro Prato, Giuliana Giribaldi, Manuela Polimeni, Žiga Laznik, Stanislav Trdan, Shehata E. M. Shalaby, Gehan Abdou, Andreia Almeida, Francisco Amaral Villela, João Carlos Nunes, Geri Eduardo Meneghello, Adilson Jauer, Moacir Rossi Forim, Bruno Perlatti, Patrícia Luísa Bergo, Maria Fátima Da Silva, João Fernandes, Christian Nansen, Solange Maria De França, Mariana Breda, César Badji, José Vargas Oliveira, Gleberson Guillen Piccinin, Alan Augusto Donel, Alessandro Braccini, Gabriel Loli Bazo, Keila Regina Hossa Regina Hossa, Fernanda Brunetta Godinho Brunetta Godinho, Lilian Gomes De Moraes Dan, Maria Lourdes Aldana Madrid, Maria Isabel Silveira, Fabiola-Gabriela Zuno-Floriano, Guillermo Rodríguez-Olibarría, Patrick Kareru, Zachaeus Kipkorir Rotich, Esther Wamaitha Maina, Taema Imo Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2013 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Alternative Host Plants As Reservoirs of the Cotton Leaf Hopper, Amrasca Devastans, and Its Natural Enemies
    1 The importance of alternative host plants as reservoirs of the 2 cotton leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans, and its natural enemies 3 4 Rabia Saeeda, Muhammad Razaqb and Ian C.W. Hardyc 5 6 aEntomology Department, Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan 7 bDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin 8 Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan 9 cSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, 10 UK 11 12 13 14 15 Correspondence to: 16 Dr Ian C.W. Hardy 17 School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, 18 Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK 19 20 Tel: +441159516052 21 Fax: +441159516261 22 Email: [email protected] 23 _____________________________________________ 24 Accepted 21-12-2-14 25 Saeed R, Razaq M & Hardy ICW 2015 The importance of alternative host plants as reservoirs 26 of the cotton leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans, and its natural enemies. Journal of Pest 27 Science 88:517-531 28 _____________________________________________ 29 1 30 31 Abstract 32 Many agricultural pests can be harboured by alternative host plants but these can also harbour 33 the pests’ natural enemies. We evaluated the capacity of non-cotton plant species (both 34 naturally growing and cultivated) to function as alternative hosts for the cotton leaf hopper 35 Amrasca devastans (Homoptera: Ciccadellidae) and its natural enemies. Forty eight species 36 harboured A. devastans. Twenty four species were true breeding hosts, bearing both nymphal 37 and adult A. devastans, the rest were incidental hosts. The crop Ricinus communis and the 38 vegetables Abelomoschus esculentus and Solanum melongena had the highest potential for 39 harbouring A.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of Rice Green Leafhopper Nephotettix Nigropictus
    International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 Received: 03-08-2019; Accepted: 05-09-2019 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 4; Issue 6; October 2019; Page No. 12-15 Genetic analysis of rice green leafhopper Nephotettix nigropictus (Stål) from Samosir island- Indonesia using partial DNA sequence of cytochrome oxidase sub unit I (COI) gene Binari Manurung1*, Ashar Hasairin2, Abdul Hakim Daulae3 1-3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Medan, Jl. Willem Iskandar Pasar V Medan Estate, Medan, Indonesia Abstract The green leafhopper Nephotettix nigropictus (Stål) (Auchenorhyncha: Hemiptera) is insect transmitter of rice tungro virus that cause damage and death on rice plants. There is none genetic analysis of N. nigropictus that be isolated from Samosir island-North Sumatra Indonesia by using partial DNA sequence of mitochondrial citochrome oxidase sub unit I (COI) DNA gene. This study aimed to identify and to know the nucleotide composition of N. nigropictus based on mt COI or DNA barcoding. Genetic analysis of that leafhopper consisted of four steps, namely: Leafhopper sample catching on rice field by using insect net, DNA extraction by using Zymo Tissue & Insect DNA Mini Prep, DNA amplification by using PCR and My TaqTM HS Red Mix and DNA sequence analysis by using ABI PISM 3730XL Genetic Analyzer. Primer cocktail tRWF-Mlep was used in DNA amplification step. The research result showed that mt COI DNA fragment of N.nigropictus has length 448- 458 bp. This mt COI DNA sequence was dominated by A and T bases (74.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • AKPAH EDUKU.Pdf
    KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE LABORATORY STUDIES TO DEVELOP CASSAVA BAIT TO CONTROL INSECT INFESTATION OF COCOA BEANS USING COFFEE BEAN WEEVIL, ARAECERUS FASCICULATUS (DE GEER) (COLEOPTERA; ANTHRIBIDAE), AS MODEL SPECIES. BY AKPAH EDUKU JUNE, 2014 i LABORATORY STUDIES TO DEVELOP CASSAVA BAIT TO CONTROL INSECT INFESTATION OF COCOA BEANS USING COFFEE BEAN WEEVIL, ARAECERUS FASCICULATUS (DE GEER) (COLEOPTERA; ANTHRIBIDAE), AS MODEL SPECIES. BY AKPAH EDUKU THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY (M. PHIL.) POST-HARVEST TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 2014 ii DECLARATION I, Akpah Eduku, hereby declare that, except for specific references, which have been duly acknowledged, this project is the result of my own research and it has not been submitted either in part or in whole for any other degree elsewhere. AKPAH EDUKU ……………………….. …………………… Student No. PG418610 Signature Date Dr. B. K. MAALEKUU ……………………….. …………………….. (Main Supervisor) Signature Date Ms. P. D. KALEDZI ….…………………… …………………….. (Co – Supervisor) Signature Date Dr. BEN KWAKU BANFUL ……………………….. …………………….. (Head of Department) Signature Date i DEDICATION After rains comes sunshine, After darkness comes the glorious dawn. There is no joy without its admixture of misfortune, There is no misfortune without its alloy of joy. Behind the ugly terrible mask, Lies the beautiful countenance of prosperity. So, tear the mask. Awolowo (Nigerian) To God be the glory for the great things he has done. This work is dedicated to Him, The Almighty God, and then to my only daughter, Lucina Akpah.
    [Show full text]
  • 197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus
    SECTION 9 SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) 1. Taxonomy of the Genus Helianthus, Natural Habitat and Origins of the Cultivated Sunflower A. Taxonomy of the genus Helianthus The sunflower belongs to the genus Helianthus in the Composite family (Asterales order), which includes species with very diverse morphologies (herbs, shrubs, lianas, etc.). The genus Helianthus belongs to the Heliantheae tribe. This includes approximately 50 species originating in North and Central America. The basis for the botanical classification of the genus Helianthus was proposed by Heiser et al. (1969) and refined subsequently using new phenological, cladistic and biosystematic methods, (Robinson, 1979; Anashchenko, 1974, 1979; Schilling and Heiser, 1981) or molecular markers (Sossey-Alaoui et al., 1998). This approach splits Helianthus into four sections: Helianthus, Agrestes, Ciliares and Atrorubens. This classification is set out in Table 1.18. Section Helianthus This section comprises 12 species, including H. annuus, the cultivated sunflower. These species, which are diploid (2n = 34), are interfertile and annual in almost all cases. For the majority, the natural distribution is central and western North America. They are generally well adapted to dry or even arid areas and sandy soils. The widespread H. annuus L. species includes (Heiser et al., 1969) plants cultivated for seed or fodder referred to as H. annuus var. macrocarpus (D.C), or cultivated for ornament (H. annuus subsp. annuus), and uncultivated wild and weedy plants (H. annuus subsp. lenticularis, H. annuus subsp. Texanus, etc.). Leaves of these species are usually alternate, ovoid and with a long petiole. Flower heads, or capitula, consist of tubular and ligulate florets, which may be deep purple, red or yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccidology. the Study of Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (E-Journal) Revista Corpoica – Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (2008) 9(2), 55-61 RevIEW ARTICLE Coccidology. The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Takumasa Kondo1, Penny J. Gullan2, Douglas J. Williams3 Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) Coccidología. El estudio de insectos ABSTRACT escama (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: A brief introduction to the science of coccidology, and a synopsis of the history, Coccoidea) advances and challenges in this field of study are discussed. The changes in coccidology since the publication of the Systema Naturae by Carolus Linnaeus 250 years ago are RESUMEN Se presenta una breve introducción a la briefly reviewed. The economic importance, the phylogenetic relationships and the ciencia de la coccidología y se discute una application of DNA barcoding to scale insect identification are also considered in the sinopsis de la historia, avances y desafíos de discussion section. este campo de estudio. Se hace una breve revisión de los cambios de la coccidología Keywords: Scale, insects, coccidae, DNA, history. desde la publicación de Systema Naturae por Carolus Linnaeus hace 250 años. También se discuten la importancia económica, las INTRODUCTION Sternorrhyncha (Gullan & Martin, 2003). relaciones filogenéticas y la aplicación de These insects are usually less than 5 mm códigos de barras del ADN en la identificación occidology is the branch of in length. Their taxonomy is based mainly de insectos escama. C entomology that deals with the study of on the microscopic cuticular features of hemipterous insects of the superfamily Palabras clave: insectos, escama, coccidae, the adult female.
    [Show full text]